Printer Friendly

Bristol-Myers Squibb wins Florida breast implant case.

A jury in Jacksonville, Florida, recently rejected a woman's claims that she was injured by her breast implants (Love v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., No. 94-238-CA (Fla., Duval County Super. Ct. Jan. 26, 1996).

The verdict prompted the winning defendant to urge other plaintiff to accept the settlement currently offered by implant manufacturers rather than take their chances in court.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. announced its victory in a press release the day of the verdict. "The verdict serves as a reminder of the risks of litigation versus the certainty of participating in the settlement," said John McGoldrick, the company's general counsel. The settlement "provides much more certainty, and claimants are provided compensation without having to prove causation."

The plaintiff, Yaren Love, alleged that her Bristol-Myers implants caused severe pain, inflammation, and tissue damage. According to a paralegal in the office of Love's attorney, C. Wayne Alford of Jacksonville, Love chose to take her case to a jury because she believed the settlement offer would have provided her with inadequate compensation--about $10,000 to $20,000.

Attorneys for women with implants have criticized the offer as insufficient and predicted more trials than would have occurred under the original global settlement, which collapsed last year. (Breast Implant Makers Offer New Settlement; Dow Chemical Stays Out, TRIAL, Jan. 1996, at 14.
COPYRIGHT 1996 American Association for Justice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1996, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Trial
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Mar 1, 1996
Words:217
Previous Article:California task force reviews cameras in courts.
Next Article:Latex allergies become focus of suits by medical personnel.
Topics:


Related Articles
Defective penile implants cited in lawsuits.
FDA orders further study of foam breast implants.
Opt-out deadline approaches for breast implant pact.
Adding insult to injury: the breast-implant settlement falls short.
Attorneys challenge findings in Mayo breast implant study.
Breast implant litigation faces uncertain future.
A confederacy of boobs.
Breast implant makers offer new settlement; Dow Chemical stays out.
Plaintiffs score victories in breast implant cases.
Lawsuits question safety and efficacy of Plavix.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters