Breaking strength evaluation of biodegradable twines to reduce ghost fishing in the pot and trap fisheries of Chile.
Several technological innovations exist to disable fishing gears in the event they are lost or abandoned (Matsuoka et al., 2005). Biodegradable twines, galvanic time releases, and corrodible hog rings are among the most commonly used devices to deactivate pots and traps (e.g., Scarsbrook et al., 1988; Kimker, 1990; Gagnon & Boudreau, 1991; Kruse & Kimker, 1993; Selliah et al., 2001; Redekopp et al., 2006; Barnard, 2008; Kim et al., 2014). Degradable devices are important for species conservation and produce economic benefits, considering that natural twines are a lower cost measure available to accomplish these objectives (Kruse & Kimker, 1993). Biodegradable twines are constructed of vegetable fiber thus water temperature, fiber type, rotting power of the water, and duration of immersion are the main factors that determine degradation rates (Klust, 1982; Kim et al., 2016).
Several shellfish fisheries require the use of biodegradable netting/twine as a means to reduce or mitigate the negative effects of ghost fishing (Macfadyen et al., 2009). Examples include the spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) fishery in Florida, that requires the use of a degradable device since 1982 (Matthews & Donahue, 1996), the king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) and the tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) fisheries in the Bering Sea, that require an escape mechanism (Macfadyen et al., 2009), the Dungeness crab fishery (Cancer magister) in Alaska, that requires the use of number 60 thread cotton twine or less as an escape cord in traps (Redekopp et al., 2006), and the snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) fishery in eastern Canada, that requires the use of 96 thread cotton twine installed in a special zipper (Winger et al., 2015).
This study aimed to evaluate the degradation of different twines manufactured from natural fibers under a controlled laboratory experiment. We focused on twines that were readily available through the local market of Valparaiso, Chile, with potential application to local fisheries employing pots and traps.
A total of nine (n = 9) twine types manufactured from natural fibers were sourced from the local market of Valparaiso, Chile. These included twisted jute, twisted cotton, and braided cotton. Three diameters of each twine type were evaluated, ranging from 2.0 to 6.0 mm for jute, 2.5 to 5.0 mm for twisted cotton, and 2.0 to 5.2 mm for braided cotton: the twines varied in their type of construction (twisted or braided), in the number of cords, in the number of yarns per cord, and the number of total yarns (Table 1).
Twine samples were submerged in a flowing seawater tank (0.5 m3) located at Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso. The twines were suspended on frames (0.5 x 0.64 m) to maintain complete immersion and effective contact with the seawater which ranged from 14.5-15.5[degrees]C. The experiment was carried out from October 22 to December 17 of 2012. In order to quantify the loss of breaking strength (kgf) over time, a frame with a total of 10 samples of each twine type was removed at regular intervals (14, 28, 42 and 56 days), dried at room temperature for five days and assessed. Samples of the dried twines were tested using a dynamometer (Buraschi Dyna 400DP). All measurements were performed under IS01805-2006. Due to the heteroscedasticity and non-normality observed in the exploration of the data, and heteroscedasticity shown in the residual versus fitted values of the Gaussian GLM model, it was decided to use the Poisson GLM, which does not assume normality or homogeneity of variance of the data. Poisson GLM (P = 0.05) was used to evaluate the effect of soak time, twine material (cotton or jute), twine construction (twisted or braided), twine diameter and a number of total yarns in the response variable breaking strength. Assumptions of independence, fixed X, no overdispersion and no patterns in the residuals were met. 'Stats' package of R statistical software (R Core Team, 2014) was used to perform the statistical analysis with the glm function. Bivariate linear regression was used to predict the value of the dependent variable (breaking strength) based on the value of the independent variable (soak time), as well as extrapolate the time until failure. In cases where breaking strength increased initially, we initiated the regression from that time forward to failure. Sigmaplot 12.0 was used to create the bivariate linear regression plots.
Initial measurements of breaking strength were collected before submersion of the twines in seawater (Day 0). Mean breaking strengths at that time ranged from 11.8 to 66.3 kgf (Table 2). Once submerged, many of the twines exhibited an initial increase in breaking strength on days 14 and 28. This increase would be due the day 0 samples were not soaked in seawater prior testing, and may have affected the compression and rigidity of the fibers in the twines.
All of the twines experienced a reduction in breaking strength throughout the study (Tables 2-3). After 56 days in seawater, the mean reduction in breaking strength ranged from 0.5 to 71.7%. Poisson GLM results indicated that for every additional day of soak time there was a 0.5% (95% C.I. 0.4-0.6%) reduction in breaking strength. For every additional mm/unit of diameter, there was a 29% (95% C.I. 2534%) increase in breaking strength. For every additional yarn in the twine, there was a 0.007% (95% C.I. 0.006-0.008%) increase in breaking strength.
As we move from cotton to jute twine material, we experienced a 94% (95% C.I. 80-107%) increase in breaking strength. As we move from braided to twisted twine construction, we experienced a 23% (95% C.I. 16-30%) increase in breaking strength (Table 4).
Linear regression from maximum breaking strength was used to predict the time to failure in the manner like Winger et al. (2015). Extrapolating the x-intercept (i.e., when breaking strength reaches 0 kgf) produced predictions of 113-230 days for the twisted jute twines, 68-234 for the twisted cotton twines, and 108-205 for the braided cotton twines (Fig. 1, Table 3). Linear regressions produced the following equations that relate breaking strength and soak time for the different twines tested:
Breaking strength (Twisted jute 2) = -0.083 x soak time + 19.088 [R.sup.2] = 0.248
Breaking strength (Twisted jute 3) = -0.1829 x soak time + 40.453 [R.sup.2] = 0.178
Breaking strength (Twisted jute 6) = -1.16 x soak time + 130.96 [R.sup.2] = 0.617
Breaking strength (Twisted cotton 2) = -0.3746 x soak time + 25.36 [R.sup.2] = 0.961
Breaking strength (Twisted cotton 3) = -0.1254 x soak time + 29.39 [R.sup.2] = 0.548
Breaking strength (Twisted cotton 5) = - 0.89 x soak time + 66.913 [R.sup.2] = 0.922
Breaking strength (Braided cotton 2)= - 0.1313 x soak time + 14.15 [R.sup.2] = 0.957
Breaking strength (Braided cotton 3) = - 0.1774 x soak time + 21.14 [R.sup.2] = 0.836
Breaking strength (Braided cotton 5) = -0.2249 X soak time + 46.18 [R.sup.2] = 0.818
The results revealed that soak time had a significant effect on breaking strength. Twine properties included in the analysis (diameter, material, construction and some yarns) were significant predictors of breaking strength and affected the degradation rates. Braided and twisted cotton twines exhibited significant decay rates and low variability in breaking strength, which makes them ideal candidates for further experiments as escape mechanisms in pots and traps to reduce ghost fishing. Twisted jute twines, by comparison, exhibited lower decay rates and higher variability in breaking strength, making them poor candidates for implementation into fisheries.
In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that braided and twisted cotton twines have the appropriate properties for further testing as a biodegradable escape mechanism in pot and trap fisheries in Chile, while twisted jute twines are unlikely to offer a solution to reduce ghost fishing. This study represents a preliminary evaluation of potential biodegradable twines to reduce ghost fishing in Chilean fisheries. Results are based solely on laboratory observations, which is a common starting point for such investigations (e.g., Barnard, 2008; Matsushita et al., 2008). We recommend further experiments be conducted to evaluate the decay of twines under in situ field conditions. Similar to Winger et al. (2015), the twines should be tested in the fishery in which they want to be implemented, deploying them on real fishing grounds, mounted in the traps or pots, and during the fishing season.
The authors would like to especially thank Dr. Paul Winger for his comments and suggestions in this work. This work was supported by Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso.
Arana, P.M. 2012. Recursos pesqueros del mar de Chile. Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, 308 pp.
Barnard, D.R. 2008. Biodegradable twine report to the Alaska board of fisheries. Alaska Department of fish and game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Fishery Data Series 08-05, Kodiak, 19 pp.
Brown, J., Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T., Magnus, J. & Tumilty, J. 2005. Ghost fishing by lost fishing gear. Final Report to DG Fisheries and Maritime Affairs of the European Commission. Institute for European Environmental Policy/Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd. Joint Report, 132 pp.
Gagnon, M. & Boudreau, M. 1991. Sea trials of a galvanic corrosion delayed release mechanism for snow crab trap. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1803: 17 pp.
Hebert, M., Miron, G., Moriyasu, M., Vienneau, R. & DeGrace, P. 2001. Efficiency and ghost fishing of snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) traps in the Gulf of St Lawrence. Fisheries Research, 52: 143-153.
Kim, S., Park, S. & Lee, K. 2014. Fishing performance of an Octopus minor net pot made of biodegradable twines. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14: 21-30.
Kim, S., Kim, P., Lim, J., An, H. & Suuronen, P. 2016. Use of biodegradable driftnets to prevent ghost fishing: physical properties and fishing performance for yellow croaker. Animal Conservation, 19: 309-319.
Kimker, A. 1990. Biodegradable twine report to the Alaska board of fisheries. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Regional Information Report No2H90-05, Anchorage, 10 pp.
Klust, G. 1982. Netting materials for fishing gear. FAO Fishing Manual, Fishing News Books Ltd., Farnham, UK, 177 pp.
Kruse, G.H. & Kimker, A. 1993. Degradable escape mechanisms for pot gear: a summary report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Regional Information Report No5J93-01, Anchorage, 23 pp.
Lovrich, G. 1997. La pesqueria mixta de las centollas Lithodes santolla y Paralomis granulosa (Anomura: Lithodidae) en Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Investigaciones Marinas, 25: 41-57.
Macfadyen, G., Huntington, T. & Cappell, R. 2009. Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies, No185. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, 523, Rome, UNEP/FAO, 115 pp.
Matthews, T.R. & Donahue, S. 1996. By-catch in Florida's spiny lobster trap fishery and the impact of wire traps. Report submitted to the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 15 pp.
Matsuoka, T., Nakashima, T. & Nagasawa, N. 2005. A review of ghost fishing: scientific approaches to evaluation and solutions. Fisheries Science, 71: 691-702.
Matsushita, Y., Machida, S., Kanehiro, H., Nakamura, F. & Honda, N. 2008. Analysis of mesh breaking loads in cotton gill nets: possible solution to ghost fishing. Fisheries Science, 74: 230-235.
Redekopp, R., Fisher, W., Neal, M., Velasquez, D. & Frenzl, S. 2006. Escape cord degradation rates in Port Townsend, WA. Snohomish county marine resources committee Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, November 1, 2006, 15 pp.
Retamal, M.A., Aedo, G., Suarez, C., Montecinos, S., Gacitua, S., Pedraza, M. & Arana, P. 2009. Estado actual del conocimiento de las principales especies de jaibas a nivel nacional. Fondo de Investigacion Pesquera, Informe Tecnico FIP-IT/2007-39: 237 pp.
R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [www.R-project.org]. Reviewed: 18 March 2017.
Scarsbrook, J.R., McFarlane, G.A. & Shaw, W. 1988. Effectiveness of experimental escape mechanisms in sablefish traps. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 8: 158-161.
Selliah, N., Oxenford, H. & Parker, C. 2001. Selecting biodegradable fasteners and testing the effects of escape panels on catch rates of fish traps. In: Creswell, R.L. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 52: 634-653.
Winger, P.D., Legge, G., Batten, C. & Bishop, G. 2015. Evaluating potential biodegradable twines for use in the snow crab fishery off Newfoundland and Labrador. Fisheries Research, 161: 21-23.
Corresponding editor: Antonio Avila
Received: 21 July 2017; Accepted: 21 August 2018
Tomas Araya-Schmidt (1,2) & Dante Queirolo (2)
(1) Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University, St. John's, Canada
(2) Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Geografia Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile
Corresponding author: Tomas Araya-Schmidt (email@example.com)
Caption: Figure 1. Breaking strength (kgf) of the biodegradable twines with increasing soak time (days) and the linear fit of the data from the maximum average breaking strength.
Table 1. Biodegradable twines selected from the local market of Valparaiso Region. Where "S" and "Z" indicate the direction of the twist, from left to right and right to left, respectively. Twine Diameter (mm) Construction No cords Twisted jute 6 6.0 [+ or -] 0.4 Twisted "Z" 3 Twisted jute 3 3.0 [+ or -] 0.2 Twisted "S" 1 Twisted jute 2 2.0 [+ or -] 0.1 Twisted "S" 1 Twisted cotton 5 5.0 [+ or -] 0.5 Twisted "Z" 3 Twisted cotton 3 3.3 [+ or -] 0.2 Twisted "Z" 3 Twisted cotton 2 2.5 [+ or -] 0.1 Twisted "Z" 3 Braided cotton 5 5.2 [+ or -] 0.3 Braided 16 Braided cotton 3 3.0 [+ or -] 0.2 Braided 16 Braided cotton 2 2.0 [+ or -] 0.1 Braided 16 Twine No yarns No yarns No total per cord in the core yarns Twisted jute 6 7 / 21 Twisted jute 3 7 / 7 Twisted jute 2 5 / 5 Twisted cotton 5 15 / 45 Twisted cotton 3 20 / 60 Twisted cotton 2 10 / 30 Braided cotton 5 4 24 88 Braided cotton 3 2 8 40 Braided cotton 2 1 4 20 Table 2. Average breaking strength (kgf), the coefficient of variation and total loss of average breaking strength of the twines. Values on parenthesis are coefficients of variation. Twine Average breaking strength at day 0 14 28 Twisted jute 6 66.3 (0.13) 81.7 (0.15) 75.4 (0.16) Twisted jute 3 33.5 (0.10) 31.0 (0.14) 35.1 (0.15) Twisted jute 2 18.9 (0.11) 17.5 (0.17) 17.2 (0.17) Twisted cotton 5 39.3 (0.11) 41.0 (0.17) 42.5 (0.05) Twisted cotton 3 26.5 (0.05) 28.6 (0.04) 24.6 (0.09) Twisted cotton 2 16.6 (0.09) 19.9 (0.05) 15.5 (0.09) Braided cotton 5 42.4 (0.09) 42.9 (0.04) 40.2 (0.06) Braided cotton 3 18.6 (0.02) 18.5 (0.12) 16.4 (0.07) Braided cotton 2 11.8 (0.04) 12.3 (0.04) 10.5 (0.04) Average breaking strength Twine at day Total loss of 42 56 average breaking strength (%) Twisted jute 6 82.2 (0.09) 66.0 (0.10) 0.5 Twisted jute 3 33.3 (0.13) 29.9 (0.15) 10.4 Twisted jute 2 17.0 (0.2) 13.3 (0.21) 29.6 Twisted cotton 5 28.2 (0.14) 17.6 (0.15) 55.2 Twisted cotton 3 23.7 (0.05) 23.1 (0.07) 12.8 Twisted cotton 2 8.80 (0.12) 4.70 (0.15) 71.7 Braided cotton 5 36.5 (0.04) 33.6 (0.05) 20.8 Braided cotton 3 13.8 (0.05) 11.1 (0.03) 40.3 Braided cotton 2 8.60 (0.05) 6.80 (0.08) 42.4 Table 3. Initial, maximum and final average breaking strength (kgf), breaking strength loss rate and estimated time for the twine to break. * Calculated from the maximum average breaking strength value by a linear fit of the data. Initial average Maximum Twine breaking average breaking strength (Day 0) strength Twisted jute 2 18.9 18.9 Twisted jute 3 33.5 35.1 Twisted jute 6 66.3 82.2 Twisted cotton 2 16.6 19.9 Twisted cotton 3 26.5 28.6 Twisted cotton 5 39.3 42.5 Braided cotton 2 11.8 12.3 Braided cotton 3 18.6 18.6 Braided cotton 5 42.4 42.9 Final average Breaking Twine breaking strength strength loss rate (Day 56) (kgf [day.sup.-1]) * Twisted jute 2 13.3 0.08 Twisted jute 3 30.0 0.18 Twisted jute 6 66.0 1.16 Twisted cotton 2 4.7 0.37 Twisted cotton 3 23.1 0.13 Twisted cotton 5 17.6 0.89 Braided cotton 2 6.8 0.13 Braided cotton 3 11.1 0.18 Braided cotton 5 33.6 0.22 Twine broke Twine estimated time (days) * Twisted jute 2 230 Twisted jute 3 221 Twisted jute 6 113 Twisted cotton 2 68 Twisted cotton 3 234 Twisted cotton 5 75 Braided cotton 2 108 Braided cotton 3 119 Braided cotton 5 205 Table 4. Estimated regression parameters, standard error, Z value and P-value for the Poisson GLM. SE: standard error Estimate SE Z value P-value Intercept 1.670 0.043 39.139 < 0.001 Soak time -0.005 0.0004 -10.939 < 0.001 Twine material Jute 0.661 0.035 19.068 < 0.001 Twine diameter 0.293 0.008 36.206 < 0.001 Twine construction twisted 0.206 0.028 7.430 < 0.001 Total yarns 0.007 0.0007 9.622 < 0.001
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Short Communication|
|Author:||Araya-Schmidt, Tomas; Queirolo, Dante|
|Publication:||Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2019|
|Previous Article:||Body shape variation between farms of tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) in Colombian Andes using landmark-based geometric morphometrics.|
|Next Article:||Gastrointestinal helminths of wild Humboldt penguins Spheniscus humboldti (Meyen, 1834) from the south-central coast of Chile.|