Printer Friendly

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in horses/Potencial evocado auditivo de tronco encefalico em equinos.

INTRODUCTION

Hearing is one of the primary means for interacting with the environment and is important for survival and perceiving other animals and possible predators (STRAIN & MYERS, 2006).The brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) is an objective test that evaluates the integrity of the auditory pathway. Interpretation of the results aids the veterinarian in diagnosing deafness and establishing the severity of the lesion in the auditory pathway (MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1990; STRAIN, 1996). When this test is performed in a healthy animal, a waveform with up to seven peaks can be observed. The first five peaks are the most clinically informative, and peaks I, III, and V are the easiest to identify at intensities ranging from 70 to 90dB (MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1992).

Each wave produced corresponds to a specific region of the auditory pathway. Waves I, II, III, IV, and V originate in the ipsilateral cranial nerve VIII, cochlear nucleus, pons, lateral lemniscus, and caudal colliculus of the midbrain. Waves VI and VII are generated in the medial geniculate body of the thalamus and auditory radiations. These latter two waves are not always present in horses (MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1997).

Use of BAEPs to assess the auditory function of horses has been studied since 1980 (MARSHALL, 1981, 1985). In addition to horses (ROLF et al., 1987; MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1997; MAYHEW, 2003; WILSON et al., 2011), similar studies have been conducted in human adults and children (JIANG et al., 1991), dogs (HOLLIDAY & TE SELLE, 1985, KAWASAKI & INADA, 1994; UZUKA et al., 1998; MURRELL et al., 2005; WILSON & MILLS, 2005; PALUMBO et al., 2012), and cattle (ARAI, 2008).

The objective of this study was to standardize the BAEP in healthy horses in Brazil and characterize the latencies of the waves generated at a given intensity of an acoustic stimulus in 21 adult horses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Auditory evoked potential tests were performed in 21 horses, including 13 males and eight females, aging between two to 12 years. This study was conducted in the Electroneurodiagnostic Laboratory of the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (Faculdade de MedicinaVeterinaria e Zootecnia--FMVZ), Sao Paulo State University (Universidade Estadual Paulista--UNESP)--Botucatu, and was initiated following approval by the Ethics Committee (protocol: 201/2012). As an animal selection criterion, an otoscopy was performed to confirm that the auditory canal and inner pinna were intact and had no alteration that could affect the test results.

The animals underwent a 12-h solidfood fast prior to the procedure. Animals were then intravenously sedated with detomidine hydrochloride (0.013mg.[kg.sup.-1] BW). The test was initiated 10 minutes after sedation. Needle electrodes were inserted subcutaneously at the base of each ear (O1 and O2-active electrodes), on the forehead (Fpz reference electrode), and at the vertex (Cz ground electrode) (Figure 1). A band-pass filter of 200-3000Hz, a sensitivity of 2.5 [micro] V [cm.sup.-1], and an analysis time of 1ms/ cm were used. Insert earphones were used to transmit the sound stimuli. Tests used rarefaction clicks with a duration of 2ms and an intensity of 90dB in the tested ear and a masking noise with an intensity of 40dB in the contralateral ear. For each ear, at least two sets of 500 stimuli were obtained using a 2-channel Teca Synergy System (Viasys Healthcare[R]).

Each test measured the absolute latencies in milliseconds of waves I, III and V and of interpeaksI-III, III-V, and I-V on each side. These values were used to calculate and interpret the means and standard deviations of the variables. Values obtained from the right and left sides and those obtained from males and females were compared (paired t-test).

RESULTS

Figure 2 shows the auditory evoked potential obtained from an adult horse. Table 1 shows the mean, minimum, and maximum values and standard deviations of waves I, II, III, IV, and V and of interpeaks I-III, IIII-V, and I-V for the 21 animals at an intensity of 90dB.

There was no significant difference between the latency values obtained from the left and right sides of the animals. Except for wave III (P=0.0082), the remaining waves and interpeaks showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05) between males and females.

DISCUSSION

Despite the lack of previous reports of BAEP testing in horses in Brazil, this test has been used for various purposes in other countries. HARLAND et al. (2006) described the use of BAEP testing to diagnose deafness in a horse belonging to a Paint Horse breed that lacks pigmentation of the face and has blue eyes. In 2008, ALEMAN et al. used BAEP testing to diagnose deafness in horses with temporohyoid osteoarthropathy (THO). ALEMAN et al. (2014a) identified auditory impairment in 57 horses after performing BAEP testing on 76 animals. The most common causes of BAEP changes were THO, congenital sensorineural deafness in Paint Horses, multifocal cerebral disease, and otitis media/ interna. ALEMAN et al. (2014b) associated changes in the potentials of foals with diseases such as sepsis, neonatal encephalopathy, neonatal isoerythrolysis, and preterm birth. Results of the present study will be used as a reference for comparison with the latencies obtained from horses with various alterations in their auditory pathways.

Latency values obtained in this study were similar to those obtained by ALEMAN et al. (2014): wave I, 2.12 ( [+ or -] 0.06)ms; wave III, 3.61 ( [+ or -] 0.17)ms; wave V, 5.36 ( [+ or -] 0.16)ms; interpeak I-III, 1.40 ( [+ or -] 0.15) ms; interpeak III-V, 1.74 ( [+ or -] 0.15) ms; and interpeak I-V, 3.14 ( [+ or -] 0.12) ms. In BAEP tests on horses, wave I required an additional 1.0ms to travel through the earphones and reach the animal's ear compared to the results of other authors using headphones (MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1990, 1992, 1997; MAYHEW, 2003). This difference may be explained by the unqualified delay in the earphones compared to the use of headphones (MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1992).

Multiple factors can influence the variation of BAEP results, including age, sex, breed, and head size (WILSON & MILLS, 2005). Animals with a larger head require a greater time to produce a response to the generated stimuli. Breed was not a criterion used to select the animals, and therefore, it was not investigated. In the present study, when the latencies of males and females were compared, only wave III was significantly longer in males. As there was no significant difference in the remaining latencies, this increase may not have clinical relevance.

WILSON et al. (2011) described the use of BAEP testing for the diagnosis of deafness in older horses. Their study used nine horses, five young and four older horses. Stimulus intensities of 90 to 20dB were used. When comparing the two groups, the older group of animals had worse hearing thresholds and wave V amplitudes at a stimulus intensity of 90dB. In the present study, animals aged between two and 12 years were selected so that age would not interfere with the obtained latencies, and the stimulus intensity was kept constant.

Some pharmaceuticals, such as aminoglycosides (CROWELL, 1981; NOSTRANDT, 1991), have toxic effects, affecting the hair cells of the cochlea and altering BAEP results. In this study, although the animals' previous history of medication use was unknown, none of the 21 tested horses showed any alteration in the tracings.

Some anesthetics can alter the latency and amplitude of the BAEP waves (WILSON & MILLS, 2005); however, these drugs are used to facilitate the collection and interpretation of the results (POMIANOWSKI & ADAMIAK, 2010). Detomidine was used for BAEP testing in horses by other authors without interfering with the results obtained (MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1990; MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1992; MAYHEW & WASHBOURNE, 1997; HARLAND et al., 2006; WILSON et al., 2011). Because horses become agitated during handling of the ears and placement of the earphones, sedation enables the recording of potentials with less interference and produces less stress for the animals.

CONCLUSION

This is the first technical standardization study for horses in Brazil and is of great importance to the diagnosis of hearing disorders that have not been clinically identified.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20141716

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are thankful forthe grant provided by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo FAPESP 2010/00518-1).

REFERENCIAS

ALEMAN, M. et al. Brainstem auditory-evoked responses in horses with temporohyoidosteo arthropathy. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, v.22, p. 1196-1202, 2008. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ j. 1939-1676.2008.0158.x/full>. Accessed: Jan. 20, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0158.x.

ALEMAN, M. et al. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in an equine patient population: part I-adult horses. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, v.28, n.13, p.1310-1317, 2014a. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.12379/full>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2014. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12379.

ALEMAN, M. et al. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in an equine patient population. part II: foals. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, v.28, n.13, p.1318-1324, 2014b. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.12377/ full>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2014. doi: 10.1111/jvim.12377.

ARAI, S. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in cattle sedated with xylazine. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, v.72, p.287-290, 2008. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC2327241/=>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

CROWELL, W.A. et al. Neomycin toxicosis in calves. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.42. n. 1, p.29-34, 1981. Available from: <http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/6111966>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

HARLAND, M. et al. Diagnosis of deafness in a horse by brainstem auditory evoked potential. Canadian Veterinary Journal, v.47, p.151-154, 2006. Available from: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC1345730/pdf/cvj47pg151.pdf>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

HOLLIDAY, T.A.; TE SELLE, M.E. Brain stem auditory-evoked potentials of dogs: wave forms and effects of recording electrode positions. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.46, p.845-851, 1985. Available from: <http://europepmc.org/abstract/ med/4014834>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

JIANG, Z.D. et al. Brainstem auditory evoked responses from birth to adulthood: Normative data of latency and interval. Hearing Research, v. 54, p.67-74, 1991. Available from: <http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037859559190137X>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90137-X.

KAWASAKI, Y.; INADA, S. Peaks of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in dogs. Veterinary Research Communications, v.18, p.383-396, 1994. Available from: <http://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/BF01839289>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1007/BF01839289.

MARSHALL, A.E. Brain stem auditory evoked response in the non-anesthetized horse and pony. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.46, p. 1445-1450, 1985. Available from: <http:// europepmc.org/abstract/med/4026024>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

MARSHALL, A. et al. Brainstem auditory evoked response in the diagnosis of inner ear injury in the horse. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, v.178, p.282-286, 1981. Available from: <http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/6971862>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

MAYHEW, I.G.; WASHBOURNE, J.R. A method of assessing auditory and brainstem function in horses. British Veterinary Journal, v.146, p.509-518, 1990. Available from: <http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007193590900547>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(90)90054-7.

MAYHEW, I.G.; WASHBOURNE, J.R. Short latency auditory evoked potentials recorded from non-anaesthetized thoroughbred horses. British Veterinary Journal, v.148, p.315-327, 1992. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/000719359290084E>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(92)90084-E.

MAYHEW, I.G.; WASHBOURNE, J.R. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in horses and ponies. Veterinary Journal, v.153, p.107-113, 1997.Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S1090023397800159>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.doi:10.1016/S1090-0233(97)80015-9.

MAYHEW, I.G. The clinical utility of brainstem auditory evoked response testing in horses. Equine Veterinary Education, v.15, p.31-33, 2003. Available from: <http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2042-3292.2003. tb00209.x/abstract>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1111/ j.2042-3292.2003.tb00209.x.

MURRELL, J.C.; HELLEBREKERS, L.J. Investigation of changes in the middle latency auditory evoked potential during anesthesia with sevoflurane in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.66, n.7, p.1156-1161, 2005. Available from: <http:// avmajournals.avma.org/doi/abs/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1156>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1156.

NOSTRANDT, A.C. et al. Ototoxic potential of gentamicin in ponies. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.52, n.3, p.494-498, 1991. Available from: <http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/2035927>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

PALUMBO, M.I.P. et al. Auditory evoked potential to diagnose of bilateral deafness in two dogs. Ciencia Rural, v.42, n.3, p.494-497, 2012. Available from: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/cr/v42n3/a8112cr5679.pdf>. Accessed: Jan. 01, 2013.

POMIANOWSKI, A.; ADAMIAK, Z. Bone-conducted brainstem auditory evoked response in a dog with total bilateral ear canal ablation: a case report. VeterinarniMedicina, v.55, p.39-41, 2010. Available from: <http://vri.cz/docs/vetmed/55-01-39.pdf>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

ROLF, S.L. et al. Auditory brain stem response testing in anesthetized horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.48, p.910-914, 1987. Available from: <http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/3605806>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012.

STRAIN, G.M. Aetiology prevalence and diagnosis of deafness in dogs and cats. British Veterinary Journal, v.152, p.17-36, 1996. Available from: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0007193596800832>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1016/S00071935(96)80083-2.

STRAIN, G.M.; MYERS, L.J. Audicao e equilibrio. In: REECE, W. Dukesfisiologia dos animais domesticos I. 12. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2006. p.793-804.

UZUKA, Y. et al. Brainstem auditory evoked responses elicited by tone-burst stimuli in clinically normal dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, v.12, p.22-25, 1998. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1998.tb00492.x/abstract>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1998.tb00492.x.

WILSON, WJ.; MILLS, P.C. Brainstem auditory-evoked response in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v.66, n.12, p.2177-2187, 2005. Available from: <http://avmajournals.avma.org/doi/ abs/10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.2177>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.2460/ ajvr.2005.66.2177.

WILSON, W.J. et al. Use of BAER to identify loss of auditory function in older horses. Australian Veterinary Journal, v.89, n.3, p.73-76, 2011. Available from: <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1751 0813.2010.00682. x/full>. Accessed: Aug. 01, 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1751 0813.2010.00682. x.

Juliana Almeida Nogueira da Gama (I) Mariana Isa Poci Palumbo (II) Giovane Olivo (I) Nadia Crosignani Outeda (I) Luiz Antonio de Lima Resende (III) Alexandre Secorun Borges (I) *

(I) Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Rubiao Junior, s/n, 18618-000, Botucatu, SP, Brasil. E-mail: asborges@fmvz.unesp.br. * Corresponding author.

(II) Clinica de Pequenos Animais, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.

(III) Departamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu (FMB), Botucatu, SP, Brasil.

Received 11.25.14 Approved 08.31.15 Returned by the author 12.09.15

CR-2014-1716.R1

Table 1--Mean, minimum, and maximum values and standard
deviations of the latencies of waves (I, II, III, IV, and
V) and interpeaks (I-III, III-V, and IV) at an intensity
of 90dB in 21 horses.

Latency    Mean (ms)     Minimum-     Standard deviation
                       Maximum (ms)

I            2.24      2.1-2.34              0.06
II           2.74      2.58-2.92             0.08
III          3.61      3.36-3.88             0.12
IV           4.61      4.22-4.86             0.17
V            5.49      5.24-5.92             0.15
I-III        1.37      1.16-1.64             0.11
III-V        1.88      1.46-2.18             0.16
I-V          3.26      2.98-3.70             0.16
COPYRIGHT 2016 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:clinica y cirugia; texto en ingles
Author:de Gama, Juliana Almeida Nogueira; Palumbo, Mariana Isa Poci; Olivo, Giovane; Outeda, Nadia Crosigna
Publication:Ciencia Rural
Date:Apr 1, 2016
Words:2655
Previous Article:Induction and transfer of resistance to poisoning by Amorimia pubiflora in sheep whith non-toxic dosis of the plant and ruminal content/Inducao e...
Next Article:Feline primary hyperaldosteronism: an emerging endocrine disease/Hiperaldosteronismo primario felino: uma enfermidade endocrina emergente.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |