Printer Friendly

Bound by the cursor. (In Session).

A Massachusetts judge is set to rule on a breach of contract suit that could establish email messages as binding agreements for real estate deals.

Plymouth Superior Court Judge Ernest B. Murphy has already refused to dismiss the breach of contract suit, in which plaintiff Jonathan P. Shattuck alleges defendant David K. Klotzbach reneged on a legal agreement to sell his multimillion-dollar Massachusetts home. Via e-mail the two sides reached an agreed upon purchase price of $ 1.825 million and discussed plans to sign a purchase and sale agreement. However, after six months of negotiations, Klotzbach pulled out of the deal and argues the e-mails are not equivalent to signed documents and don't constitute binding agreements.

Judge Murphy already ruled that since the e-mails concluded with the senders' typewritten names, they could be taken as legally binding purchase and sales agreements.
COPYRIGHT 2002 National Association of Realtors
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:email contracts
Publication:Journal of Property Management
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2002
Words:141
Previous Article:Fair Housing Laws: who knew? (In Session).
Next Article:HUD opens doors for religious groups. (In Session).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters