Printer Friendly

Black Skin, White Coats: Nigerian Psychiatrists, Decolonization, and the Globalization of Psychiatry.

Black Skin, White Coats: Nigerian Psychiatrists, Decolonization, and the Globalization of Psychiatry, by Matthew M. Heaton. Athens, Ohio University Press, 2013. x, 249 pp. $32.95 US (paper).

The colonial asylum has attracted much scholarly attention over the past twenty years. Knitting together Foucauldian critiques of expert authority with Saidian approaches to "colonial knowledge," these studies have emphasized the ideological ends served by the treatment of mental illness as well as the material constraints that kept imperialist ambitions in check. Matthew M. Heaton offers a new perspective on these issues by asking how Nigerian psychiatrists reckoned with the colonial legacy in the age of decolonization. Drawing to an impressive degree on archives in Ibadan and Kaduna, Heaton charts how these figures negotiated their training in Western institutions and early careers under British rule, then the evolution of medical care under political self-rule and the expanding role of international forces like the World Health Organization. While Heaton is attentive to differences among the figures he discusses, postcolonial psychiatry in his account is defined by a sense of hybridity--a continuing commitment to Western diagnostic categories coexisting with the insistent rejection of racial typologies and eloquent claims for cultural sensitivity. The psychiatrist who features most prominently in the book, Thomas Adeoye Lambo, emerges as an innovator whose signature initiative for the mentally ill in the 1950s and 1960s combined cutting-edge clinical therapies with immersion in village life in the communities near Aro Hospital.

These are stories worth telling, not least, because they contribute to an ongoing reevaluation of the extent to which "colonial knowledge" was really "colonial" at all. The invocation of master concepts like decolonization and globalization, however, raises difficult questions. Heaton argues that the postcolonial and the global emerged simultaneously in Nigerian psychiatry and that they did so through a model of the mind he terms "humanistic universalism." Paralleling the achievement of political independence, he suggests, the ascendancy of this model marked a triumph and a liberation for Nigerians--above all because it eclipsed the racist and hierarchical assumptions of British ethnopsychiatry. But equating the colonial era with a "primitivist" view and the postcolonial era with a "universalist" view of African mental illness is debatable. Throughout imperial rule in the twentieth century, British officials, missionaries, and human scientists--including W.H.R. Rivers, Bronislaw Malinowski, and E.E. Evans-Pritchard, to name a few of the best-known--proclaimed that universal laws of psychology transcended cultural boundaries. In the 1910s and 1920s, they forcefully rejected Lucien Levy-Bruhl's theory of a distinctive "primitive mentality" while explaining difference on the basis of cultural relativism rather than biological evolutionism. Universalistic theories of human nature long predated the end of empire and they could serve many different ideological ends--including evolutionist-hierarchical and liberal-reformist programs within the imperial project.

Some of the most interesting parts of the book demonstrate that universalistic and relativistic conceptions of mind interacted in complex ways on both sides of the colonial / postcolonial divide. While the language of "detribalization"--suggesting that tradition-bound Africans risked losing their minds when confronted with the stresses of Western modernity--is rightly seen as a hallmark of British ethnopsychiatry, Lambo likewise believed the rapidity of social change in Africa was causing widespread mental illness. He echoed colonial thinkers, too, in his invocations of a monolithic "African" culture, in his reliance on a Euro-American vocabulary of psychiatry, and in his faith in science as an agent of progress. Heaton might have addressed the implications of this uncomfortable overlap more fully: what does it mean, after all, that colonial ethnocentrism and postcolonial universalism look so similar in many ways? Complicating matters further is that the modernizing zeal of Nigerian psychiatrists sometimes led them to cast a more skeptical eye on non-Westem approaches to mental health than their colonial predecessors. In the 1950s, J.C. Carothers, a notoriously racist British ethnopsychiatrist, argued that some mental disorders could be treated most effectively by traditional practitioners; in the 1960s, by contrast, Nigerian psychiatrist Tolani Asuni insisted that belief in witchcraft and traditional healers was incompatible with scientific modernity. Asuni's position is, of course, readily explicable as a reaction against the paternalistic and anachronistic sensibility of "indirect rule." And yet the contrast points up the dangers of celebrating postcolonial psychiatry--as Heaton seems to--for synthesizing universalistic and relativistic sensibilities. That synthesis has deep roots in the history of the human sciences and the history of empire. By restricting the view to a much shorter time period and implying the existence of a fundamental shift around 1960, the lens of decolonization risks collapsing many of the complexities, contradictions, and ironies running through theories of mind and culture in the past. So, too, does the narrow focus on psychiatry despite the fact that psychologists, anthropologists, and others did so much to shape those theories.

Concentrating on a single professional community does, however, have the virtue of casting a bright light on the sociology of knowledge. The book's greatest achievement may be its demonstration that the rise and fall of social medicine in the second half of the twentieth century is not merely a story about Europeans and Americans attempting to impose their visions on the rest of the world, but also the story of a collaboration--albeit a tense, tenuous, and limited collaboration--in which Africans actively participated.

DOI: 10.3138/CJH.ACH.50.3.007

Erik Linstrum, University of Virginia
COPYRIGHT 2015 University of Toronto Press
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Linstrum, Erik
Publication:Canadian Journal of History
Article Type:Book review
Date:Dec 22, 2015
Previous Article:A Land of Aching Hearts: The Middle East in the Great War.
Next Article:Yitzhak Rabin: A Political Biography.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |