Bishops in New York sue over new medical insurance law. (Catholic Health Care).
The bishops had lobbied to force a broad exemption for Catholic institutions. The law does provide some employers with an exemption, but only if their primary function is religious, and that most of the people they employ and serve share their religion.
New York is the 20th state since 1998 to require that employers treat contraceptives just as they do other prescription drugs in their health insurance plans. Nine of the 20 have broad exemptions for religious institutions, and five have none. The remaining six states, including New York and California, exempt only institutions whose primary purpose is teaching religious values, such as seminaries and churches. A similar lawsuit in California is pending before California's Supreme Court.
In California, CFFC lead a coalition of progressive groups that filed an amici curiae brief in a similar case before the state Supreme Court. Catholic Charities of California has sued the state, charging that the 2000 Women's Contraceptive Equity Law does not allow adequate exemptions for religious organizations. The brief shows that Catholic Charities is not a religious employer; that Catholics may and do dissent from Catholic teachings on contraception and many Catholic hospitals and insurance companies implement strategies that uphold Catholic theology and provide contraception; and that there is no basis in Catholic theology for any contraceptive ban to be applied to non-Catholics (which would be the result of exempting Catholic Charities from the law). The case is pending.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Mar 22, 2003|
|Previous Article:||Catholic groups protest Novak's visit to Rome. (The Church and State).|
|Next Article:||Nicaraguan bishops fail in attempts to force 9-year-old to give birth. (In Catholic Circles).|