Printer Friendly

Biodiversity of the Pantanal: response to seasonal flooding regime and to environmental degradation/Biodiversidade do Pantanal: resposta ao regime sazonal de enchente e a degradacao ambiental.

1. Ecological Processes Favoring Biodiversity: Flooding Regime and Seasonal Productivity

Large and environmentally heterogeneous wetlands like the Pantanal (147,574 [km.sup.2]--latitude 15[degrees] 30'-22[degrees] 30' S and longitude 54[degrees] 45'-58[degrees] 30' W) play an important role in biological diversity, because of the diversity of natural habitats offering opportunities for feeding and reproductive niches, in addition to many essential ecosystem services including carbon storage, flood control, fish production, and aquifer recharge (Alho, 2005; Alho and Goncalves, 2005; Alho et al., 1988a; Keddy and Fraser, 2005). Other functions have more complex relationships since species richness or biodiversity generally increases with area, under an evolutionary process. On the other hand, habitat insularization of a biota within a small area contributes to a reduction in the number of species, according to the theory of island biogeography (Shafer, 1990). This is a well known phenomenon in Ecology named species-area relationship. (Figure 1).

The most striking aspect of the Pantanal is its curious combination of mesic and xeric vegetation growing side by side due to seasonal flooding. The relationship among slope-soil/water/vegetation cover/fauna, is significant in differentiating the Pantanal plains, with an average altitude of 80 to 150 m, from their surrounding plateaus (Planalto) with altitudes varying from 200 to 1,200 m. The Pantanal is located in a climatic dry area.

The Pantanal is a sedimentary basin, a mosaic of alluvial fans of Pleistocene (11,000 to 1.8 million years) origin, periodically flooded, surrounded by highlands. The relief of the Upper Paraguay Basin is marked with contrasts between the low and flat floodplain (Pantanal) and the surrounding non-flooded lands of plateaus and depressions (Planalto).

The present landscape arrangement and natural ecosystems are the result of three factors: 1) geological changes occurring since the Quaternary, which probably influenced the drainage patterns of the region; 2) the pronounced differences in annual cycles of wet and dry seasons plus exceptional periods of long flooding or droughts causing retraction or expansion of the Pantanal, thus, a phenomena related to greater or lesser primary productivity and ecological succession and 3) areas related to human intervention such as pastures, artificial ponds or introduced trees near the ranch houses.

The rainy season, with most rain falling between November and March, but with variations between the northern and the southern regions, varies annually from 1,200 to 1,300 mm across the region and in some years can reach 2,000 mm. Rainfall is more intensive in the northern uplands than in the south. From May to October the land dries out and grasslands and scattered pools (locally named "baias") appear. The reasons for this mixture are the topography and the seasonal climate. Hence, the patches of forest experience severe drought during the six-month dry season. The mixture of permanent and temporary flooded habitats, and gallery forests or patches of woodland, contributes to the richness of the vegetation and productivity of the system, which, in turn, supports the exuberant abundance of fauna.

The major rivers feeding the Pantanal are (from north to south): Paraguay, Bento Gomes, Cuiaba, Sao Lourenco-Itiquira, Taquari, Negro, Aquidauana-Miranda, Nabileque and Apa. These tributaries of the Paraguay are slow moving when they meet the flatland and have coves with adjacent flood land. They periodically overflow their banks. The maze of fluctuating water levels, nutrients, and wildlife forms a dynamic ecosystem. The flooding occupies about 80% of the whole Pantanal. In contrast, during the dry season, most of the flooded areas stay dry, when the water returns to the river beds or evaporates.

Annual rainfall in the highlands is generally above 1,200 mm, which produces a rapid response in the drainage basin. Water finds reduced runoff on the plains, flooding the region. Depressions retain water volume, forming small temporary lakes and ponds (locally known as "baias") or flooding the permanent ones. During low water times the retained water volume does not return to the riverbed to be drained, but remains where it is and evaporates or infiltrates the soil. The rainfall level on the plains (Pantanal) is from 800 to 1,200 mm and potential evaporation is 1,300 to 1,600 mm, and so the hydric balance is negative. Evaporation of water from the land is greater than the volume of water received through precipitation. The retention of water on the plains reaches 30 to 60%, transforming the Pantanal into a wetland. In the north, flooding occurs from March to April and from July to August in the south.

In the floodplain (Pantanal) the topographical gradients are weak, with the slope ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 [] east-west and 0.03 to 0.15 [] north-south (Franco and Pinheiro, 1982). The river slope in the highlands (plateaus surrounding the Pantanal) is about 0.6 [], while on the plain it is 0.1 to 0.3 []. The slow flow of the rivers when they reach the floodplain results in decreased current velocity and loss of most of the suspended sediment. Dissolved oxygen ([O.sub.2]) concentrations drop drastically, followed by accumulation of dissolved carbon dioxide (C[O.sub.2]) and decreased pH (Hamilton et al., 1995).

Seasonal flooding and nutrients--Water chemistry, frequency and degree of flooding, soil types, and other factors define the nature of each kind of wetlands and the vegetation it supports. Wetlands often represent a temporal and spatial transition from open water to dry land, and some plant species can bridge the transition between aquatic and terrestrial conditions.


Thus, the Pantanal is strongly affected by hydrology (wet and dry seasons) and so by nutrient enrichment that affects food-web and aquatic as well terrestrial communities. These trophic relationships include food resources, consumers, and potential competitors in ecological constraints on the occurrence and abundance of species in the biome. Species abundance in the Pantanal is a key factor related to seasonal offer of ecological resources, including feeding and reproductive niches. The region is well known as nursery and foraging habitats for a large number of species, some of them present in an enormous number of individuals, such as waterfowl, caimans, capybaras and many others. Reasons for the observed seasonal variability in food and reproductive niches supply include differences in nutrient enrichment and flooding regimen. It involves the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients as well as the production of phytoplankton, zooplankton, microfauna and macrophytes living in the aquatic system.

Contact of the river water with the floodplain results in depletion of dissolved oxygen ([O.sub.2]), oversaturation of carbon dioxide (C[O.sub.2]) and methane (C[H.sub.4]), loss of suspended sediments, and reduced export of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P). Oxygen depletion and associated chemical changes are most marked when river water first contacts the floodplain; in some years, the water remains anoxic throughout the river channel and ponds for some weeks, causing massive fish mortality. This phenomenon is locally known as "dequada". Most chemical weathering of minerals seems to take place in the upland drainage basins rather than on the floodplains, and most major solutes display conservative mixing in the river-floodplain system (Hamilton et al., 1997). The habitats change as a function of the water discharge carrying nutrients and sediments, depositing inorganic and organic matters that enrich the microhabitats, favoring the proliferation of microorganisms, invertebrates, fishes, and so on.

Thus, three major factors characterize the Pantanal wetland: water, substrate and biota. The hydrological phenomenon is evident in the region. The substrate feature is a result of the geomorphologic and climatic evolutions, which support recurrent and sustained saturation. A representative biota arises from species of flora and fauna specifically adapted to the local flooding cycles. So, indicators for the three factors (water, substrate and biota) can be easily identified (Alho, 2005).

1.1. Influence of hydrologic pulses on vegetation: habitat heterogeneity

The dry and wet cycle affects the dynamics, ecological succession of the biota such as aquatic plants and community composition and structure in ponds of the Pantanal (Pott et al., 1996). During the dry season 18 species were recorded and Pistia stratiotes L. had the highest absolute and relative frequency, followed by Salvinia auriculata (Micheli) Adans, Oxycaryum cubense Poepp and Kunth, Eichhornia azurea (Sw.) Kunth and Hydrocleys nymphoides (Humbold and Bonpland ex Willd.) Buchenau. During the wet season, with the enlarged pond ("baias), 38 species were found with highest absolute and relative frequencies of Oxycaryum cubense Poepp. and Kunth, Eichhornia azurea (Sw.) Kunth, Ludwigia sedoides (Humbold and Bonpland) Hara, Salvinia auriculata (Micheli) Adans, Utricularia gibba L., Hydrocleys nymphoides Humbold and Bonpland ex Willd.) Buchenau and Luziola subintegra (Sw.). A list of Pantanal plants, as a result of a 10 year period of field work, offering information on identification, distribution and use reached 1,863 Phanerogams species (Pott and Pott, 1994).

In flooded areas of the sub-region of Paiaguas, the plant community in arboreal pockets of savanna ("capoes de cerrado") changes, determining defined landscape characteristics (Pott and Adamoli, 1996). In areas not or rarely flooded, there is predominance of the grass "capim-carona" Elyonurus muticus (Sprengel) Kuntze followed by the "lixeira" tree Curatella americana L. In forest pockets, under moderate flooding, there is a dominance of "cambara" Vochysia divergens Pohl, in many cases transforming the landscape into continuous and homogeneous forest locally named "cambarazal". In areas with a high degree of inundation, the "canjiqueira" Byrsonima orbygniana A. Juss. predominates, also forming homogeneous units called "canjiqueiral".

At the same time, well-adapted plants occupy the available spaces and, during the wet season, the aquatic species rapidly reproduce. The trees interact with the environment through their roots. The organic matter, dead or alive, is rapidly altered, favoring the proliferation of invertebrates and the migration of fishes from the river to the flooded areas.

The higher ground (where there are patches of savanna and "cordilheira" of woodland) is only a couple of meters above average water level. The "cordilheiras" are the higher parts of ancient dunes presently covered with forested savanna or semi-deciduous forest. Along rivers the gallery forest is covered by vines such as "cipo-dearraia" Cissus spinosa Cambess. and "uvinha" Cissus sicyoides L. They are more or less vigorous depending on the flooding pattern.

The areas in the shadowed interior of the gallery forests produce less algae and biomass of floating plants than the sunny areas, but they receive more dead leaves, branches and dead trunks, which play a crucial role in the energetic balance of the system (Wantzen and Junk, 2000). Substrates of dead trees are generally sources of diversity and abundance for invertebrates.

During the high water level, the flow is slow through depressions locally known as "corixos" or shallow water paths, "vazantes". The depth of the water close to the river channels is less than six meters and near two meters on the floodplains.

Ecological processes such as the flooding regime, however, are not the exclusive factor affecting biodiversity. The seasonal change between the aquatic and terrestrial phases resulting in rapid nutrient cycling allows productivity for a region generally considered nutrient poor.

In conclusion, the annual rising and falling phases of the waters result in: a) influencing plant species richness, diversity and distribution patterns; b) adaptation to a wide range of flooding habitats; and c) decreasing local habitat diversity and maintenance of landscape diversity and heterogeneity.

One of the most important publications on the Pantanal is the PCBAP (Plano de Conservacao da Bacia do Alto Paraguai = Plan for Conservation of the Upper Paraguay Basin), describing the physical and biotic environments of the Pantanal (PCBAP, 1997). The PCBAP surveyed 3,400 species of superior plants occurring in the upper Paraguay River basin and half of this number is considered to occur in the Pantanal. The phytophysiognomic units of Pantanal are characterized by their phytosociological and ecological arrangements, forming well defined landscape units going from inundated floating plants, seasonal flooding fields, gallery forests, scrub and semi-deciduous forests and different kinds of Cerrado savanna (Alho, 2005).

1.2. Flooding and feeding effects on fish movement

Out of its 147,574 [km.sup.2] the Pantanal is estimated to have an average inundated area of 43,000 [km.sup.2], which expands during the wet season. About 400 fish species are estimated to live in the region (plateaus and plains). Britiski et al. (1999) listed 263 species for the Pantanal. This list does not include species living in the upper river habitats.

Fish are an important resource, both ecologically and socially. Because of the great variety of feeding and reproductive niches for fish, the Pantanal harbors high species diversity and considerable abundance. Fishing is of fundamental social-economic importance for local people. In addition, fishing for sport is one of the incentives to attract tourists to the region.

The most-captured commercial fish species are: "pintado" Pseudoplatystoma corruscans Spix and Agassiz, 1829, "cachara" Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum Linnaeus, 1766, "dourado" Salminus maxillosus Valenciennes, 1850, "pacu" Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887, " curimba" Prochilodus lineatus Valenciennes, 1836, "piranhas" Serrasalmus spilopleura Kner, 1858 and S. marginatus Valenciennes, 1837, "piavucu" Leporinus macrocephalus Garavelo and Britski, 1988, "barbado" Pinirampus pinirampu Spix and Agassiz, 1829, "jau" Paulicea luetkeni Ihering, 1898, "bagre" Pimelodus argenteus Perugia, 1891, "cabecudo" P. ornatus Kner, 1858, "jurupuca" Hemisorubim platyrhynchos Valenciennes, 1840, "jurupensem" Sorubim lima Bloch and Schneider, 1801, "pacu-peba" Mylossoma orbignyanum Valenciennes, 1849, and "piraputanga" Brycon microlepis Perugia, 1897. Fish farming is a growing activity in the region. The fish species composition may change from one wet season to another, depending on the pattern and duration of the inundation.

Three distinct phases can be distinguished in the fish cycle in relation to the water regime in the Pantanal (PRODEAGRO, 1997):

1. Flood season, a period of continuous rain with inundation of the plains, occurring from October to April. First, in the "piracema" type of migration the fish schools move upstream at the beginning of the rainy season. Later, migratory fish leave the riverbed and move into the adjacent flooding areas searching for food. Reproduction occurs at the beginning of the rainy season when a schooling behavior known as "rodada" is observed. Therefore, the "rodada" occurs at the end of the migratory trip known as "piracema";

2. Drainage season, a period coinciding with the end of the rainy season from April to May. Fish disperse from flooded areas to the riverbed and permanent ponds or lagoons. This fish movement is known as "lufada". During this period fish are pursued and caught by natural predators; and

3. Dry season, running from June to October. Fish start organizing schools for reproductive migration (piracema). Sedentary species face low levels of dissolved oxygen in the shallow water and some stay dormant in the mud during the dry season. Thus, the flooding cycle is determinant for migration and successful reproduction.

1.3. Response of amphibians to the flooding regime

Compared to other Brazilian biomes, the Pantanal presents a herpetofauna low in diversity but high in abundance. Among amphibians there are around 80 species occurring on the upper Paraguay Basin, 41 of which occur on the plains, (Alho et al., 2002; Alho, 2005; Sabino and Prado, 2006).

During the rainy season, the region presents vigorous populations of amphibians, thanks to the expansion of favorable habitats. About half of the anuran species in the Pantanal live in trees. Some species, such as the spotted-tree-frog Hyla punctata Schneider, 1799, show association with permanent bodies of water (rivers and ponds) and others, such as the purple-barred-tree-frog Hyla raniceps Cope, 1862, the green-leaf-frog Scinax acuminatus Cope, 1862, the yellow-and-black-tree-frog Scinax fuscovarius Lutz, 1925, tolerate droughts but population suddenly grows when flooding comes, usually October to May. Frogs are also more vocal during this period. The tiny clicking-frog Lysapsus limellus Cope, 1862 lives on floating vegetation and vocalizes also by day. Others that vocalize on floating plants are the paradox-frog Pseudis paradoxa Linnaeus, 1758 and the speckled-bellied-frog Physalaemus albonotatus Steindachner, 1864. During the rainy season this Physalaemus albonotatus frog is one of the most conspicuous and vocal when they join in a sonorous choir, even by day.

Amphibians with terrestrial habits are the leaf-toad Bufo typhonius Linnaeus, 1758, the frogs Chiasmocleis mehelyi Caramaschi and Cruz, 1997, Leptodactylus elenae Heyer, 1978, Physalaemus cuvieri Fitzinger, 1826, and the arboreal frog Phrynohyas venulosa Laurenti, 1768. Another tiny frog living in dead tree holes in the forest is Chiasmocleis mehelyi Caramaschi and Cruz, 1997, which was only recently reported in the Pantanal. Some other species live at the water line between aquatic and terrestrial habitats, such as Pseudopaludicola aff. falcipes Hensel, 1867, Leptodactylus fuscus Heyer, 1978, Leptodactylus podicipinus Cope, 1862, Bufo paracnemis Lutz, 1925, Bufo granulosus Spix, 1824 and Elachistocleis cf. ovale Schneider, 1799. A colorful aposematic species is Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis Daudin, 1800.

1.4. Response of reptiles to the flooding regime

There are around 113 reptile species living in the Pantanal and 189 in the Cerrado biome (Alho et al., 2002; Alho, 2005; Sabino and Prado, 2006). There are more than 30 species of snakes. The yellow-anaconda Eunectes notaeus Cope, 1862 is very common on the plains and is small in size compared to the other species, and the green anaconda E. murinus Linnaeus, 1758 lives at the edge of the Pantanal and may reach 5 m in size. Another large snake is the water-queen Hydrodynastes gigas Dumeril, Bibron and Dumeril, 1854, which occurs at the borders of gallery forests or patches of savannas looking for toads, their preferred food. Small nocturnal snakes, which prey upon frogs, are Thamnodynastes cf. strigilis Thunberg, 1787, Leptodeira annulata Linnaeus, 1758 and Liophis poecilogyrus Wied-Neuwied, 1825.

The caiman Caiman crocodillus Linnaeus, 1758 is abundant and conspicuous, particularly during the dry season, being one of the symbols of the Pantanal. Twenty species of lizards are known for the region, all preferring dry habitats except for the Pantanal-caiman-lizard Dracaena paraguayensis Amaral, 1950, which lives in the water.

1.5. Response of waterfowl to the flooding regime

There are 463 bird species recorded only for the floodplains, 665 species when the uplands are included, and 837 species for the Cerrado biome (Alho et al., 2002; Alho, 2005; Sabino and Prado, 2006; Tubelis and Tomas, 2002; Silva, 1995). Bird species with aquatic habits are very common and abundant, including egrets such as species of the genera Casmerodius, Egretta, Ardea, Tigrisoma, Botaurus, in addition to the wood-stork Mycteria americana Linnaeus, 1758, the maguari-stork Ciconia maguari Gmelin, 1789 and the jabiru Jabiru mycteria Lichtenstein, 1819. Kingfishers are present with 5 species of the two genera Ceryle and Choroceryle. Other aquatic species are the southern-screamer Chauna torquata Oken, 1816, the muscovy-duck Cairina moschata Linnaeus, 1758, the fulvous-whistling-duck Dendrocygna bicolor Vieillot, 1816, the white-faced-whistling-duck D. viduata Linnaeus, 1766, the black-bellied-whistling-duck D. autumnalis Linnaeus, 1758 and the Brazilian-duck Amazonetta brasilienses Gmelin, 1789. Among birds of prey are the snail-kite Rosthramus sociabilis Vieillot, 1817, the black-collared-hawk Busarellus nigricollis Latham, 1790, the great-black-hawk Butteogallus urubitinga Gmelin, 1788 and the Crane-hawk Geranospiza caerulescens Vieillot, 1817. Parrots are abundant.

Abundance is likely due to mobility, body size, ability to exploit the available seasonal resources, homeothermy, longevity, association with the water or generalist predator species. Waterfowl are exceptionally abundant and include 13 species of herons and egret (e.g. Casmerodius, Egretta and Pilherodius), three stork (Mycteria, Ciconia, and Jabiru), six ibis and spoonbill, and 5 species of kingfisher (Ceryle and Chloroceryle). Parrots are ubiquitous (19 species) and comprise 5 species of macaw, including Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus Latham, 1790. Rheas (Rhea americana Linnaeus, 1758) and crested seriemas (Cariama cristata Linnaeus, 1766) are common.

Most waterfowl species exhibit synchronized reproduction, where huge colonies of birds such as wood stork (Mycteria americana Linnaeus, 1758) egrets (snowy egret Egretta thula Molina, 1782, great white egret Casmerodius albus Linnaeus, 1758 and the capped heron Pilherodius pileatus Boddaert, 1783) and others such as the spoonbill Ajaia ajaja Linnaeus, 1758 concentrate in nesting sites in the gallery forest, during the dry season, to take advantage of the seasonal resources available. Breeding colonies are formed by hundreds of nesting birds following a pattern of species breeding at the same site or designated trees. There is a strong relation between nesting behavior exhibited by the bird species and seasonal variation of the water level. The birds take advantage of concentrations in ponds of fishes and invertebrates. The concentration of birds in rookeries allows concentration of nutrients due to dropping feces, prey and hatchlings on the ground which, in turn, attracts predators such as caimans, anacondas, wild foxes and others.

Two waves of breeding species in the same reproduction trees are recognized: a white rookery and a black rookery. In the sub-region of Barao de Melgaco, during the dry season, in the period of July-October, the white rookery is established in a few selected trees of the Cuiaba River gallery forest, nearby ponds and flooded areas, with 600 nests concentrated in a single nesting site. This white rookery is composed first by hatchlings of the wood-ibis Mycteria americana Linnaeus, 1758, followed in lower proportions by hatchlings of the egrets Ardea alba Linnaeus, 1758 and Egretta thula Molina, 1782, and finally by hatchlings of the spoonbill (Platalea = Ajaia ajaja Linnaeus, 1758). The black rookery is composed of the cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus Humboldt, 1805 = olivaceus, followed by the anhinga Anhinga anhinga Linnaeus, 1766 and the last species reproducing the white-necked heron Ardea cocoi Linnaeus, 1766.

There is a clear linkage between the flooding regimen of the Pantanal and the availability of food for the adult jabirus Jabiru mycteria Lichtenstein, 1819 to raise their young. The birds need low water, especially in ponds, in order to obtain the food they can catch with their specialized beak. The preferred food is "mussum" fish (Synbranchus marmoratus Bloch, 1795), which can stay dormant and encapsulated in the mud throughout the dry season, to swim again when the water arises in the rainy season. The jabiru is a specialist in detecting and catching the dormant fish in the muddy bed of the drying pond. They also catch snails (Pomacea spp). Jabirus migrate during the flooding season to higher grounds to still unknown sites.

1.6. Seasonal flooding affecting mammal abundance and movement

A total of 132 mammal species occur in the Pantanal while in the Cerrado there are 195 species. Capybaras (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Linnaeus, 1766) occur throughout the region (Alho et al., 2002; Alho, 2005; Sabino and Prado, 2006).

The coati Nasua nasua Linnaeus, 1766 is one of the most frequently observed species in the Pantanal (Alho et al., 1988b). They are opportunistic feeders eating crabs and other invertebrates such as bugs, termites and cicadas in grasslands near ponds during the dry season or feeding on fruits at arboreal habitats. The fox "lobinho" Cerdocyon thous Linnaeus, 1766 is also very frequently observed. They are omnivorous, eating fruits and preying on insects, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. During the dry season, they prefer crustaceans such as crabs. The giant anteater Myrmecophaga tridactyla Linnaeus, 1758 is active during the day, in open areas, being a distinctive animal with its long tail and elongated snout. The giant anteater forages in open areas visiting termite mounds or ant nests where it finds insects by rooting with its nose or by digging with its powerful front claws. The other observed anteater species Tamandua tetradactyla Linnaeus, 1758 is of a smaller size. The tail is prehensile since this species has a more arboreal habit, also feeding on both termites and ants.

Howler monkey Alouatta caraya Humboldt, 1812 is observed in canopies of gallery forests and other forest habitats. These primates are vegetarian, feeding mainly on new sprouts of trees and so they depend upon the phenological rhythms of the forest which is influenced by flooding.

Highest abundance of mammal species is observed in the Pantanal during the dry season (August and September), when there is considerable expansion of terrestrial habitats, mainly seasonally flooded grassland (Mamede and Alho, 2006). Animal abundance (in terms of observed individual frequencies) vary during dry and wet seasons, being the seasonally flooded grassland the most utilized habitat by mammals in the dry season. In this study a total of 36 mammal species and 1,299 observations of individuals were recorded in the field. The most frequently observed species were the capybara Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris Linnaeus, 1766, the marsh-deer Blastocerus dichotomus Illiger, 1815, the fox Cerdocyon thous Linnaeus, 1766 and the brocket Mazama gouazoubira G. Fisher, 1814. Thus, there is significant association of species utilization and kind of available seasonal habitat. The months with the greater number of observations of individuals were August and September, coinciding with the dry season, when more expansion of grassland fields (seasonally flooded) is observed.

Capybaras: Studies on capybaras show that the use of habitats varies seasonally (Alho et al., 1989). During the dry season, capybaras spend the night in the forest. In the early morning they leave the forest to graze on the grassland. During the rainy season, the capybaras also spend the night in the forest, but in the morning usually emerge and go directly to the water or to grazing areas. Use of aquatic and forest vegetation in their diet at that time increases significantly, since few grazing areas remain above water level.

Many aspects of the behavior and ecology of the capybara are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the amount of available food. Some preferred food items that are richer in protein tend to be more seasonal than poorer food items. There is a period of the year, from June until November, when the standing crop on lower areas susceptible to flooding is abundant and is consumed by capybaras. During the remainder of the year the presence of these food items is very scarce. Thus, the times of food abundance and scarcity are predicted by the flooding pattern. Capybara group size increases from the beginning (rainy season) to the middle of the year (dry season). During the floods the groups subdivide and are largely confined to the forest patches, while in the dry season more animals are observed feeding on the pasture of the grassland.

Marsh deers: All vegetation communities in which marsh deer Blastocerus dichotomus Illiger, 1815 have been observed (Tomas, 1993) are frequently flooded during the wet season (most habitats are formed by aquatic plants). The vegetation type most used by marsh deer is Andropogon grassland and other open areas are dominated by Pontederia, Scleria, Nymphaea, Eleocharis, Thalia, Axonopus, Oryza, Nymphoides and Luziola communities. Marsh deer select about 35 plant species, mainly aquatic plants. Pontederia cordata L. (including both flowers and leaves), Thalia geniculata L. (mainly flowers), Nymphaea spp. L., Aeschynomene sensitiva Sw., A. fluminensis Vell. Conc., Discolobium pulchellum Benth, Reussia spp. Endl., Leersia hexandra Sw. and others are frequently eaten by marsh deer. Tomas (1993) provides a list of those plants.

Small mammals: Microhabitat use among small mammals in the Pantanal shows that two oryzomyine rodents--Oligoryzomys fornesi--formerly Oryzomys fornesi Massoia, 1973 and O. subflavus Wagner, 1842--are more generalized in their use of microhabitats than are two echimyed species--Clyomys laticeps Thomas, 1909 and Trichomys apereoides Lund, 1839 - (Lacher and Alho, 1989). Oligoryzomys fornesi Massoia, 1973 is a broad habitat generalist at the "Nhecolandia" sub-region. Oryzomys subflavus Wagner, 1842 selects the "cerrado" microhabitat. Both Clyomys and Trichomys were restricted to their transition microhabitat. Although both species overlap in the same microhabitat, competition is avoided since Trichomys is scansorial while Clyomys is fossorial.

Bats: The habitat heterogeneity that is altered by seasonal flooding can influence bat distribution and abundance in the Pantanal. The most frequent bat family occurring in the region is phyllostomidae, followed by molossidae and the most captured species are Artibeus planirostris Spix, 1823, Noctilio albiventris Desmarest, 1818, Molossus molossus Pallas, 1766, Myotis nigricans Schinz, 1821 and Carollia perspicillata Linnaeus, 1758 (Boing, 2008; Pissini, 2008). While the occurrence of frugivore species in the Pantanal (such as Artibeus planirostris Spix, 1823) reflects the dependence of fruit plants, on the other hand the occurrence of rare species (such as Chiroderma doriae Thomas, 1891 which is a habitat specialist), may indicate the good conservation condition of the habitats in the region. Another habitat sensitive species is the phyllostomidae Chrotopterus auritus Peters, 1856, a carnivore species, a night predator and very sensitive to habitat degradation. The trophic structure of the bat community in the Pantanal is predominantly composed of insectivore and frugivore species and the productivity of insects and fruits is directly dependent on seasonal flooding.

2. Conservation

2.1. Response of biodiversity to environmental degradation

The Pantanal has been impacted by non sustainable practices of socio-economic development. The major economic activities are cattle ranching, fishery, agriculture, mining and tourism. The urbanization of the areas surrounding the plains are causing water pollution by discharge of liquid and solid waste and dejects, as in the case of the Cuiaba river, which crosses the large city of Cuiaba, receiving non-treated sewage discharge.

Some major conservation problems of the Pantanal floodplain originate on the plateaus (Planalto). Many farms have been established in the highlands surrounding the Pantanal and much of the natural vegetation has been converted to soybean plantations or by other activities (Alho et al., 1988a; Alho, 2005; Alho and Goncalves, 2005). Among these problems are: erosion, compacted soil, pollution, including environmental contaminants, alterations in the water level, damming of rivers, and deposition of sewage and solid waste.

Deforestation, expanding agriculture, illegal fishing and hunting, unplanned tourism, and pollution by pesticides have caused a progressive deterioration of natural habitats. Because of the huge demand for soybean plantations, and presently the expansion of sugar-cane, on the upland plateaus surrounding the Pantanal (Planalto), the application of toxic agricultural chemicals is very common (Alho and Vieira, 1997).

A new road system has motivated landowners to subdivide their land into several small lots for "developments". This has resulted in altering natural habitats, killing wildlife on the roads, and encouraging illegal fishing and hunting, while producing an abundance of trash, including plastic objects.

Deforestation: Studies concluded that 17% of the Pantanal has been deforested through the use of fire (mainly Cerrado patches or "capoes de cerrado") and 63% of the natural vegetation cover of the surrounding plateaus in the Planalto (savanna woodland and semi-deciduous forest). Ranchers set fire to the vegetation during the dry season as a "management" technique to "clean" the vegetation not used by cattle. The fire is initially started in the grassland but due to open areas, dry vegetation and wind, the fires often spread to savannas, woodland and forest. The rate of environmental degradation has been 2.3% per year (Harris et al., 2005). If the present rate of degradation continues, the Pantanal natural habitats will be destroyed in about 45 years. This study points out that, until 2004, 44% of the region was impacted by environmental degradation due to non-sustainable human activities, mainly by means of natural habitat loss and alteration, affecting wildlife. Specifically in the Pantanal, more than 25,000 [km.sup.2] of natural vegetation cover has been disrupted, in the wetland territory of both the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Mato Grosso.

Threatened species and protected areas--Threatened species are those officially recognized as endangered, threatened or otherwise at risk, through criteria established by the Ministerio do Meio Ambiente--MMA (Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameacada de Extincao (MMA, 2008)) or by the international policy of the World Conservation Union (IUCN Red List). There are 17 species listed for the Pantanal as threatened in the following categories: vulnerable, in danger and critically in danger.

Many officially threatened and endangered species can be observed roaming free in the Pantanal. Large mammals such as the jaguar (Panthera onca Linnaeus, 1758) the marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus Illiger, 1815), giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla Linnaeus, 1758), giant armadillo (Priodontes maximus Kerr, 1792), and manned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus Illiger, 1815), among others, are present in natural habitats. Other mammal species listed are: bush dog (Speothos venaticus Lund, 1842), wild cats such as ocelot (Leopardus pardalis Linnaeus, 1758), oncilla (L. tigrinus Schreber, 1775), margay (L.wiedii Schinz, 1821), wildcat (Oncifelis colocolo Molina, 1782), puma (Puma concolor Linnaeus, 1771). Among bird species, the following are listed and occur in the region: fasciated-tiger-heron (Tigrisoma fasciatum Such, 1825), chestnut-bellied-guan (Penelope ochrogaster Pelzeln, 1870), hyacinth-macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus Latham, 1790), sharp-tailed-tyrant (Culicivora caudacuta Vieillot, 1818), and great-billed-seed-finch (Oryzoborus maximiliani Cabanis, 1851).

The area is still far from the planned goal to have 10% of its territory protected. Two major protected federal areas are established: the Pantanal National Park, with 135,000 ha, and the Taiama Reserve, with 11,200 ha. The others are private reserves, such as the Ecological Station of SESC, at the sub-region of Barao de Melgaco, and Acurizal, Penha and Doroche in the vicinities of the National Park. Other protected areas are located in the uplands such as the Chapada dos Guimaraes and the Serra da Bodoquena.

The Brazilian environmental legislation is considered up-to-date covering a broad range of issues, but the major problem is its actual enforcement.

Acknowledgements--This paper is the product of research conducted in the Pantanal over more than two decades. I gratefully acknowledge the invitation of Dr. Jose Galizia Tundisi (Instituto Internacional de Ecologia) to present this chapter on the biodiversity of the Pantanal. I thank my wife Celina Alho for her valuable and careful revision of the manuscript.

Received December 27, 2007--Accepted December 27, 2007--Distributed November 30, 2008 (With 1 figure)


ALHO, CJR., CAMPOS, ZMS. and GONCALVES, HC., 1989. Ecology, Social Behavior, and Management of the Capybara (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) in the Pantanal of Brazil. In REDFORD, KH. and EISENBERG, JF. (Eds.). Advances in Neotropical Mammalogy. Florida, Gainesville: Sandhill Crane Press. p. 163-194.

ALHO, CJR., LACHER-Jr, TE. and GONCALVES, HC., 1988a. Environmental degradation in the Pantanal Ecosystem of Brazil. BioScience, vol. 38, no. 3, p. 164-171.

ALHO, CJR., LACHER-Jr. TE., CAMPOS, ZMS. and GONCALVES, HC., 1988b. Mamiferos da Fazenda Nhumirim, Sub-Regiao de Nhecolandia, Pantanal do Mato Grosso do Sul: Levantamento Preliminar de Especies. Rev. Brasil. Biol. = Braz. J. Biol., vol. 48, no. 2, p. 213-225.

ALHO, CJR. and VIEIRA, LM., 1997. Fish and wildlife resources in the Pantanal wetlands of Brazil and potential disturbances from the release of environmental contaminants. Environ.Toxic. and Chemistry, vol 16, no. 1, p. 71-74.

ALHO, CJR., STRUSSMANN, C. and VASCONCELLOS, LS., 2002. Indicadores da magnitude da diversidade e abundancia de vertebrados silvestres do Pantanal num mosaico de habitats sazonais. Corumba: Centro de Pesquisa Agro-Pecuaria da EMBRAPA. Published in digital media (CD-ROM).

ALHO, CJR., 2005. The Pantanal. In FRASER, LH. and KEDDY, PA. (Org.). The World's Largest Wetlands--Ecology and Conservation. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, p. 203-271. ISBN 0-521-83404-X.

ALHO, CJR. and GONCALVES, HC. 2005. Biodiversidade do Pantanal. Ecologia e Conservacao. Campo Grande-MS: Editora UNIDERP, 142 p. ISBN: 858739294-8.

ANA--AGENCIA NACIONAL DE AGUAS. 2004. Strategic Action Program for the Integrated Management of the Pantanal and the Upper Paraguay River Basin. Brasilia, DF: ANA/GEF/ PNUMA/OEA, 315 p. ISBN 859827604-9.

BOING, S., 2008. Requisitos de habitats de morcegos no Pantanal sul mato-grossense e Cerrado do entorno. Campo Grande: UNIDERP. [Unpublished Master Dissertation under the advice of Dr. Cleber Alho]

BRITISKI, MA., SILIMON, KZ. and BALZAC, SL., 1999. Peixes do Pantanal. Manual de Identificacao. Corumba, MS: EMBRAPA-CPAP. 184 p + ilust.

FRANCO, MSM. and PINHEIRO, R., 1982. Geomorfologia. In PROJETO RADAMBRASIL, Levantamento de Recursos Naturais. Rio de Janeiro and Corumba: Brasil, Ministerio das Minas e Energia. Departamento Nacional de Producao Mineral., p. 161-224.

HAMILTON, SK., SIPPEL, SJ and MELACK, JM. 1995. Oxygen depletion and carbon dioxide and methane production in waters of the Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Biogeochemistry, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 115-141.

HAMILTON, SK., SIPPEL, SJ., CALHEIROS, DF. and MELACK, JM., 1997. An anoxic event and other biogeochemical effects of the Pantanal wetland on the Paraguay River. Limnol. Oceanogr., vol. 42, no. 2, p. 257-272.

HARRIS, MB., ARCANGELO, C., PINTO, ECT., CAMARGO, G., RAMOS-NETO, MB. and SILVA, SM., 2005. Estimativas de perda da area natural da Bacia do Alto Paraguai e Pantanal Brasileiro. Campo Grande, MS: Relatorio tecnico nao publicado. Conservacao Internacional.

KEDDY, PA. and FRASER, LH., 2005. Introduction: big is beautiful. In FRASER, LH. and KEDDY, PA. (Eds.). The Word's Largest Wetlands. Ecology and Conservation. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 1-10.

LACHER-Jr., TE. and ALHO, CJR., 1989. Microhabitat Use Among Small Mammals in the Brazilian Pantanal. J. Mamm., vol. 70, no. 2, p. 396-401.

MAMEDE, S. and ALHO, CJR., 2006. Response of wild mammals to seasonal shrinking-and-expansion of habitats due to flooding regime of the Pantanal, Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. = Rev. Bras. Biol., vol. 66, no. 4, p. 29-41.

MMA--MINISTERIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. 2008. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameacada de Extincao. 2 volumes. MACHADO, ABM., DRUMMOND, GM. and PAGLIA, AP. (Eds.). Brasilia: Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Biodiversidade 19.

PCBAP--Plano de Conservacao da Bacia do Alto Paraguai. 1997. 3 volumes, 7 t. illustr., maps. V. 1--Metodologia do Plano de Conservacao para a Bacia do Alto Paraguai. V. 2--Diagnostico Ambiental da Bacia do Alto Paraguai; t. 1--Meio Fisico; t. 2--Hidrossedimentologia; t.3--Meio Biotico; t. 4 --Socio-economia de Mato Grosso; t. 5--Socio-economia de Mato G rosso do Sul; t. 6--Aspectos Juridicos e Institucionais de Mato Grosso; t, 7--Aspectos Juridicos e Institucionais de Mato Grosso do Sul. V. 3 - Analise Integrada e Prognostico da Bacia do Alto Paraguai. Brasilia: Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, Programa Nacional do Meio Ambiente.

PISSINI, LFO., 2008. Diversidade de especies e estrutura de comunidades de quiropteros do Pantanal da Nhecolandia, Mato Grosso do Sul. Campo Grande: UNIDERP. [Unpublished Master Dissertation].

POTT, A. and ADAMOLI, J., 1996. Unidades de vegetacao do Pantanal dos Paiaguas. In Anais do II Simposio sobre recursos naturais e socio-economicos do Pantanal. Corumba, MS: CPAP-EMBRAPA e UFMS, p. 183-202.

POTT, A. and POTT, VJ., 1994. Plantas do Pantanal. Corumba: EMBRAPA/CPAP. 320 p.

POTT, VJ., CERVI, AC., BUENO, NC. and POTT, A., 1996. Dinamica da vegetacao aquatica de uma lagoa permanente da Fazenda Nhumirim, Pantanal da Nhecolandia, MS. In Anais do II Simposio sobre recursos naturais e socio-economicos do Pantanal. Corumba, MS: CPAP-EMBRAPA e UFMS. p. 227-235.

PRODEAGRO, 1997. Projeto de Desenvolvimento Agroambiental do Estado de Mato Grosso. Governo do Estado de Mato Grosso. Cuiaba: Meio Biotico. [Paper in digital format CD].

SABINO, J. and PRADO, PI., 2006. Sintese do Conhecimento da Diversidade Biologica de Vertebrados do Brasil. In LEVINSOHN, T. (Org.). Avaliacao do Estado do Conhecimento da Diversidade Brasileira. Brasilia-DF: Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, vol. II, p. 55-143.

SHAFER, CL., 1990. The Nature Reserves. Island Theory and Conservation Practice. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 189 p. ISBN 0874748054.

SILVA, JMC., 1995. Birds of the cerrado region, South America. Steenstrupia, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 69-92.

TOMAS, W., 1993. Status and Ecology of a Marsh Deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) population in southern Pantanal, Brazil. Brasilia: WWF-Brasil Unpublished Report.

TUBELIS, DP. and TOMAS, WM. 2002. aracterizacao da avifauna da planicie do Pantanal. Indicadores da magnitude da diversidade e abundancia de vertebrados silvestres do Pantanal num mosaico de habitats sazonais. Corumba, MS: EMBRAPA, Centro de Pesquisa Agro-Pecuaria. (CD-ROM).

WANTZEN, KM. and JUNK, WJ. 2000. The importance of stream-wetland-systems for biodiversity: a tropical perspective. In GOPAL, B., JUNK, WJ. and DAVIS, JA. (Eds.). Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation. Leiden: Backhuys Bublishers, vol. 1, p. 11-34.Z

Alho, CJR. *

Pos-graduacao em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Regional, Universidade Para o Desenvolvimento do Estado e da Regiao do Pantanal--UNIDERP, Rua Ceara, 333, CEP 79003-010, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil

* e-mail:
COPYRIGHT 2008 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Alho, C.J.R.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:Dec 1, 2008
Previous Article:Deforestation and threats to the biodiversity of Amazonia/Desmatamento e ameacas a biodiversidade da Amazonia.
Next Article:Neotropical coastal lagoons: an appraisal of their biodiversity, functioning, threats and conservation management/Lagoas costeiras neotropicais: uma...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters