Printer Friendly

Bernard Piffaretti.

Although Bernard Piffaretti's painting defies all periodization from the point of view of style or evolution, it continues to unfurl over time, to the rhythm of a story that writes itself as it goes along; moreover, the activity of observing the completed works is an integral part of the creation of this ongoing tale. At Batiment Trafic, an industrial building transformed into an art center, paintings and drawings made between 2007 and 2010 could be seen in another light, as they played with the sun's rays and entered into dialogue with the architecture and with one another. Upstairs, the paintings seemed to wink to Op art; each contained a succession of vertical stripes, which created interference with the rails of the building's balustrade. On the ground floor, the effect of the square section pillars reciprocated that of the paintings, each of which repeated its image on either side of a vertical line. Two adjacent works echoed one another: One (Sans Titre, 2009) presented white squares on blue that evoked at once a building facade and the floor of the room, made of round glass blocks; the shape of these blocks seemed in turn the basis of the other painting (Tableau en negatif [Painting in Negative], 2010), in the form of a balloon or "spot." The tondo is precisely the format that the artist chose for the new series "Tableaux en negatif," which joined his other ongoing series of so-called by-products last year ("Dessins apres tableaux" [Drawings after paintings], 1998-; "Petits tableaux" [Small paintings], J995-; and "Poncifs," [Cliches], 2002-). The "Tableaux en negatif" present details, close-ups of works that have never--or have not yet--been painted.


"Avant/Post" (Before/Post), the title of the exhibition (which is taken from the text in one of the paintings, Poncif, 2008-10) thus prompts some questions: What is the value of such chronological markers once a work's details can be isolated even before it has been painted? What is left of the logical succession connecting idea and realization? Such queries represent a reformulation of the paradox that Piffaretti's oeuvre--filled as it is with constraint, freedom, and pleasure--has, since the 1980s, met head-on. Dividing a canvas in two and painting the same motif twice, on either side of a vertical line, in fact means renouncing originality by pushing away the origin, as much as it means refusing repetition by immediately projecting oneself into the after-the-fact.

Translated from French by Molly Stevens.


COPYRIGHT 2011 Artforum International Magazine, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Maldonado, Guitemie
Publication:Artforum International
Geographic Code:4EUFR
Date:Feb 1, 2011
Previous Article:Etienne Chambaud.
Next Article:"The Reality of Lowest Rank".

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters