Printer Friendly

Benthic marine fauna and flora of two nearshore coastal locations in the Western and central Canadian Arctic.

(Received 21 December 2009; accepted in revised form 21 December 2010)

ABSTRACT. Baseline data on nearshore benthic macrofauna and flora assemblages are necessary for successful enviromental monitoring in the Arctic, where major climate and industrial changes are underway, yet to date these environments remain understudied. This study used bottom video and benthic grab samples to compare shallow benthic marine (1-40 m) floral and faunal distribution and composition in two nearshore locations in the Canadian Arctic with different geomorphic settings. Sachs Harbour, located on southwestern Banks Island, has a submergent soft-sediment shoreline with locally rapid coastal erosion, while Gjoa Haven, located on southeastern King William Island, has an emergent shoreline dominated by coarse ice-contact Quaternary sediments with little to no coastal erosion. Gjoa Haven's sediment-starved, heterogeneous nearshore area contributes to a more diverse macroalgal flora than is found at Sachs Harbour, where a continuous supply of sand and mud from thermally driven coastal erosion and muddy runoff produces a more homogeneous nearshore environment. Seventy-four species (10 macroalgae, 64 macrofauna) were recorded from southwestern Banks Island and 65 species (26 macroalgae, 39 macrofauna) from southeastern King William Island. Species composition differed greatly among locations and varied significantly among substrate and depth classes for grab- and video-sampled biota at Gjoa Haven and among depth classes for bottom video biota at Sachs Harbour. Faunally barren, shallow, mobile sand sheets were the dominant habitat sampled in Sachs Harbour. Gjoa Haven's habitats differed significantly along a depth gradient, with sand and gravel substrates covered by Fucus sp. at depths shallower than 10 m and muddy substrates with filamentous green algae, Coccotylus truncatus, and cerianthid anemones inhabiting water down to 40 m.

Key words: Arctic, marine benthos, macroalgae, habitat, assemblages, coastal erosion, climate change, ecology, sedimentation

RESUME. Les donnees de reference sur les assemblages de macrofaune et flore cotieres sont necessaires pour un suivi environnemental efficace en Arctique ou d'importants changements climatiques et industriels sont en cours. Cependant, ces environnements particuliers restent peu etudies. A l'aide de videos de fond et d'echantillons benthiques, cette etude compare la distribution et la composition de la faune et flore benthique peu profonde (de 1 a 40 m) entre deux zones littorales de PArctique canadien caracterisees par differents parametres geomorphologiques. Le port de Sachs, situe au sud-ouest de I'ile Banks, est caracterise par une cote de submersion avec une erosion cotiere locale rapide. Le site de Gjoa Haven, situe au sud-est de I'ile du Roi-Guillaume, est caracterise par une cote emergente, dominee par des sediments de grosse taille du Quaternay, avec peu voire pas d'erosion cotiere. La zone cotiere de Gjoa Haven, heterogene et pauvre en sediment, contribue a la presence d'une flore macroalguale diverse comparee au port de Sachs, environnement cotier plus homogene recevant des apports continus de sediment suite a la thermo-erosion cotiere et au ruissellement boueux. Soixante-quatorze especes (10 macroalgues marines, 64 macrofaunes) ont ete reportees au sud-ouest de Pile de Banks et 65 especes (26 macroalgues marines, 39 macrofaunes) au sud-est de I'ile du Roi-Guillaume. Au site de Gjoa Haven, les videos de fond et echantillons benthiques revelent une composition d'especes tres differente en fonction des sites, substrats et profondeurs. Au port de Sachs, les videos de fond revelent une difference dans la composition des especes en fonction de la profondeur. Le principal type d'habitat echantillonne au port de Sachs est caracterise par des bancs de sable mobiles depourvus de faune. Les habitats du site de Gjoa Haven suivent un gradient de profondeur, avec Fucus sp. couvrant des fonds sableux ainsi que des graviers dans des eaux ayant une profondeur < 10 m, et des fonds boueux couverts d'algues marines vertes filamenteuses, Coccotylus truncatus. Les anemones cerianthides caracterisent les regions plus profondes jusqu'a 40 m.

Mots cles: Arctique, benthos marin, macroalgues, habitat, assemblage, erosion cotiere, changement climatique, ecologie, sedimentation

Revise pour la revue Arctic par Nicole Giguere.

INTRODUCTION

Arctic coasts are subject to rapid rates of geomorphic and biological change. Along sedimentary shorelines, accelerating climate change--including increased air and sea temperature, increased storm frequency and precipitation, global sea-level rise, and reduced sea-ice coverage--is accompanied by increased coastal erosion and sedimentation into Arctic nearshore environments (ACIA, 2005; Manson et al., 2005; Lantuit et al., 2009). These changes could alter marine benthic community structure (Snel-grove, 1998; ACIA, 2005; Piepenburg, 2005; Dunton et al., 2006; Reist et al., 2006; Anisimov et al., 2007). Benthic organisms are a critical component of the Arctic food chain, providing a food source for bottom-feeding fish, sea-birds, and marine mammals (Frost and Lowry, 1984). They may be closely coupled to the pelagic system, consuming phytoplankton, transferring nutrients, and providing a link between pelagic organisms and species at upper trophic levels, including some species harvested by Inuit, such as grey whales, bearded seals, and ringed seals (Grebmeier and Barry, 1991; Hobson et al., 1995). Benthic infauna affect sediment microbiology, chemistry, and stability by breaking down detritus and reworking the upper 20 cm of the seabed (Snelgrove, 1998). Arctic benthic communities can host diverse and abundant macrofauna and flora composed of organisms that can be sensitive to environmental change (Conlan et al., 2008). If predictions of increased climate change and anthropogenic disturbance in the North hold true, Arctic nearshore environments may be greatly stressed.

Areas in the Western Canadian Arctic undergoing glacio-isostatic submergence, such as Tuktoyaktuk and Sachs Harbour, Northwest Territories (NWT), experience rapid coastal erosion and have been characterized as "highly sensitive" to sea-level rise (Shaw et al., 1998; Manson et al., 2005; Solomon, 2005; Dunton et al., 2006). Eustatic sea-level rise from thermal expansion and melting glaciers, combined with glacio-isostatic sea-level change, will likely lead to amplified relative sea-level rise in parts of the western Arctic (Manson et al., 2005; Belliveau, 2007). Coastal areas in the central and eastern Canadian Arctic such as Gjoa Haven, though dominantly emergent, are still subject to the effects of climate change and eustatic sea-level rise. Furthermore, many of these areas may be on the cusp of changing from glacio-isostatic emergence to submergence (Tarasov and Peltier, 2004). This change may result in relatively rapid relative sea-level rise, with possible attendant coastal erosion and sedimentation.

Detailed studies of nearshore benthic marine macrofauna and flora for the Canadian Arctic are relatively scarce, except for studies by Ellis (1960), Ellis and Wilce (1961), Lee (1973), Thomson (1982), Reimnitz et al. (1992), and Dale and Leontowich (2006) and some technical reports (Wacasey et al., 1979; Heath and Thomas, 1984; Thomson et al., 1986; Atkinson and Wacasey, 1989; Siferd, 2001). Most benthic studies in the Canadian Arctic have concentrated on the benthic macrofauna inhabiting northern fiords (Curtis, 1972; Hunter and Leach, 1983; Dale, 1985; Aitken et al., 1988; Dale et al., 1989; Syvitski et al., 1989; Aitken and Fournier, 1993; Aitken and Gilbert, 1996) and along the Arctic continental shelf (Curtis, 1975; Stewart et al., 1985; Cusson et al., 2007; Conlan et al., 2008). In terms of baseline information about benthic species and communities, Arctic open-ocean and nearshore environments remain understudied in comparison with southern locations. Furthermore, researchers face the challenge of accessing the taxonomic skills and reference material required to provide a consistent and reliable inventory of species present in this region of Arctic Canada (Cusson et al., 2007). If future research can aim to fill the gaps in our knowledge of Arctic nearshore benthic ecology, we can establish a sound baseline that will help to track future changes brought on by climate change, sea-level rise, and industrialization.

In the summers of 2005 and 2006, we investigated the nearshore benthic macrofauna and flora of the southwestern coastline of Banks Island near Sachs Harbour and the southeastern coastline of King William Island near Gjoa Haven (Fig. 1). Our main goals were (1) to provide a baseline inventory and detailed description of the macrofauna and flora of the two study areas, and (2) to compare taxonomic composition at different locations, substrate types, and depths.

The shallow benthic environments in our two study locations have contrasting geomorphic settings. Sachs Harbour has a submergent, muddy-sandy shoreline with locally rapid coastal erosion, and Gjoa Haven has an emergent, gravelly shoreline with little to no coastal erosion. Both locations are the subjects of ongoing coastal geomorphic studies (Manson et al., 2005; Papadimitriou et al., 2006; Belliveau, 2007; Papadimitriou, 2007). Baseline information on the benthic macrofauna and flora is limited for the southwestern coastline of Banks Island (Sachs Harbour) (Siferd, 2001) and lacking for the southeastern coastline of King William Island (Gjoa Haven).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Sites

Sachs Harbour (71 [degrees] 59' N, 125 [degrees] 14' W) is located on Amundsen Gulf along the exposed southwest coast of Banks Island, NWT, in western High Arctic Canada. Gjoa Haven (68 [degrees] 38' N, 95 [degrees] 52' W) is located on the southeastern coast of King William Island, in the Kitikmeot Region, Nunavut, in the central Canadian Arctic (Fig. 1). Coastal geomorphic processes influencing the nearshore environment in the two areas differ greatly, and this difference is enhanced by opposing trends in relative sea level. Sachs Harbour has a submergent shoreline with coastal erosion (Manson et al., 2005; Belliveau, 2007; Catto and Parewick, 2008). Exposed coastal bluffs to the west of the community are retreating at rates up to 3 m per year, and segregated ice lenses are common (Catto and Parewick, 2008). By contrast, Gjoa Haven exhibits an emergent (1 mm per year), low-energy shoreline underlain by coarse sand and gravel ice-contact Quaternary sediments (Papadimitriou, 2007; Catto and Parewick, 2008). Segregated ice lenses are rare, and thermokarst features are very shallow and present only in areas of anthropogenic disturbance (Catto and Parewick, 2008). The coarser surficial geology of Gjoa Haven is less susceptible to erosion than the ice-rich sandy sediments of Sachs Harbour. Tidal effects in both areas are assumed to be negligible because of low tidal range and coastal topography. The coastlines of both study areas are microtidal, with a mean tidal range of 0.25 m or less (DFO, 2007). The presence of coastal bluffs that are generally higher than the tidal range along the southwestern coastline of Banks Island and raised beaches and emergent setting along the southeastern coast of King William Island minimize tidal influences. Both study areas are subject to ice scouring, especially during seasonal breakup and storm activities. Bathymetric surveys off Cape Kellett on the southwestern coastline of Banks Island showed evidence of extensive ice scour due to active sea-ice movement from the north (Belliveau, 2007).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The Sachs Harbour study area covers a 40 km length of coastline (Fig. 1). The southwestern coastline of Banks Island is composed mainly of unconsolidated sand and gravel sediments of the Miocene to Pliocene Beaufort Formation overlain by sandy Sachs Harbour till (Vincent, 1982; Vincent et al., 1983). The bluffs along this coastline are interbedded silty sand, fine sand, and gravel with up to 25% excess ice and thin lenses and icy layers with excess ice ranging from 40% to 95% (French, 1975; Manson et al., 2005) (Fig. 2a). Massive ice, pore ice, and wedge ice are also present along the coast (French, 1975; Manson et al., 2005). The southwest coastline is a low-wave energy environment, with minimal wave interaction with coastal cliffs except during periods of high waves and water levels associated with storm events (Belliveau, 2007). Rapid coastal erosion along the southwestern coastline has been tied to long-term sea-level rise, abundant ground ice, and high storm frequency (mean 8 [+ or -] 4 storms per year, 1969-2005; Belliveau, 2007) during the open-water season (Solomon, 2001; Manson et al., 2005). Eroding cliffs of varying heights dominate much of the southwest coast and supply sand and some gravel to the nearshore environment (Manson et al., 2005). The depositional features (winged headlands, barrier beaches, curved spits, and the recurved coarse spit of Cape Kellett) present along this coastline indicate that sediment transport is an important depositional mechanism (Taylor and McCann, 1983; Belliveau, 2007). Previous studies have identified three major transport directions for sediment movement: 1) northward from the Sachs Lowlands supplying the Sachs Spit, 2) eastward along the shore to the Martha Point foreland and northwestward to the Sachs Harbour spit, and 3) westward along the Duck Hawk Bluffs to Cape Kellett (Harry et al., 1983; Manson et al., 2005; Belliveau, 2007) (Fig. 3). The beaches are prograding in many parts of the shoreline, and there is a net progradation in most areas of the Sachs Harbour community, except for Cape Kellett and the Duck Hawk Bluffs (Belliveau, 2007).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The coastal area south of the community of Sachs Harbour and inshore of the Sachs Harbour spit and in the Sachs Estuary is a gently sloping glacial outwash platform with kettle lakes (French and. Harry, 1988; Manson et al., 2005). These marine-inundated kettle lake basins have depths ranging from 40 to 50 m.

The Gjoa Haven study area is approximately 18 km in length, extending north of Betzold Point to the western coast of Peterson Bay (Fig. 1). King William Island has a uniformly low-gradient, regular coastline (Stewart and Bernier, 1983) that is subject to low wave energy and has no wave-cut bluffs more than 1 m high (Catto and Parewick, 2008). Among all the islands in the Arctic Archipelago, it is one of the lowest in elevation, never rising 100 m above sea level (Fraser and Henock, 1959). The southeastern coastline, around the Gjoa Haven area, is made up of Ordovician and Silurian dolomite and dolomitic sandstone overlain by Pleistocene ice-contact sediments composed mainly of sand and gravel (Blackadar, 1967; Helie, 1984). Glacial sediments, including basal till, ablation moraine, ice-rafted boulders, and silts, are present across the island (Fraser and Henock, 1959). The community of Gjoa Haven is built on flights of raised beaches, which are composed of wind-deflated sand, gravel, and cobbles, with some glacial erratic boulders, mixed with locally derived Silurian carbonates (Dyke and Dredge, 1989) (Fig. 2b). Hummocky terrain and tundra polygons are found throughout the Gjoa Haven area, and pore ice is the most dominant form of ground ice.

The coastal area south of Gjoa Haven and inshore of Peterson Bay is a gently sloping platform. Shoals are present to the north of Betzold Point and inshore of Schwatka Bay (Fig. 4). Sediment enters the marine system primarily from the river mouth located at the head of Peterson Bay (Fig. 4). Mud plumes from the river occur typically during spring thaw and occasionally after minor summer rain events (B. Porter, pers. comm. 2006).

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Field and Laboratory Methods

In 2005 and 2006, 142 grab sample stations and 105 drop video transects were sampled in the nearshore area of the two study areas using a small open-deck speedboat piloted by a community member (Fig. 1, Table 1). Sampling sites were located 150 to 1200 m from the coast along transects perpendicular to shore at depths of 2 to 40 m. Generally, three sampling sites were sampled along each transect at approximately 200 m, 700 m; and 1200 m from shore. Transect locations and sample stations were selected to ensure a gradient in depth and maximize substrate and habitat variability. The location of each sample site was recorded using a Garmin ETrex hand-held GPS unit or WAAS-enabled Garmin 178C vessel-mounted GPS-depth sounder. To develop a bathymetric grid for each study area, we conducted sounding profiles using the Garmin GPS-MAP 178C sounder with WAAS-dGPS compatible sounder at 1-5 sec. intervals.
TABLE 1. Substrate and depth class description and representation
(number of grab stations and video transects sampled) in the Sachs
Harbour and Gjoa Haven study areas.

                                         Sachs          Gjoa
                                        Harbour         Haven

Substrate  Description                  Grab  Video   Grab  Video
class

Gravelly   Sand with more                  8      7     16     20
           than 20% dispersed
           pebbles and cobbles

Sand       Fine-, medium-,                70     29     20     20
           and coarse-grained sands

Mud        Fine sediments                 11      9     16     17
           with more than
           50% silt + clay

Hypoxic    Reduced                         1      3      0      0
mud        sediments with
           more than 50% mud

                                          Sachs          Gjoa
                                         Harbour         Haven

Depth      Description                  Grab  Video   Grab  Video
class

< 10       Stations                       62     24     16     21
m          sampled 0 to 10
           m below the surface

> 10       Stations                       28     24     36     36
m          sampled more
           than 10 m below
           the surface

Total no.                                 90     48     52     57
of
stations
sampled


Biological sampling at each site included a single benthic grab sample and a drop video camera transect. Grab sample locations were sampled with a 17 x 15 cm (0.026 [m.sup.2]) Petit-Ponar grab, sieved on a 1.0 mm mesh screen, and preserved with 4% buffered formaldehyde solution. Time and logistical constraints and unfavourable weather precluded both the dedicated, five-replicate grab sample program recommended by Holme and Mclntyre (1984) and actual measurement of grab sample volume, as suggested by Christie (1975). However, at each station we estimated the grab sample volume and took care to ensure that an adequate grab sample (no less than ~75% full; [greater than or equal to] 0.0195 [m.sup.2]) was collected and sieved. Approximately 2% of the total volume of sediment collected from each grab sample was removed for grain-size analysis before the remainder was sieved. Because the grab cannot always penetrate to the same depth when sampling different substrate types, the volume of substrate collected varied from station to station. If the sediment sample was too small, it was discarded and the sediment at that station re-sampled. Because of the variation in sample recovery and operational constraints, we analyzed grab sample data at the presence-absence level only (see Data Analysis, below).

The organisms were identified using various guides (Bousfield, 1960; Pettibone, 1963; Gosner, 1971; Macpherson, 1971; Abbott, 1974; Bernard, 1979; Appy et al., 1980; Lubinsky, 1980; Pocklington, 1989; Quijon, 2004; Gotshall, 2005). Benthic invertebrates were designated as carnivores, scavengers, suspension feeders, or deposit feeders using the classification scheme developed by Walker and Bambach (1974). The feeding guild of each organism was determined from information presented in Fauchald (1977), Fauchald and Jumars (1979), Barnes (1980), Kohn (1983), Morton (1983), and Rouse and Pleijel (2001).

Grain-size analysis of sediment samples used dry and wet sieving procedures, and sediments were classified according to the modified Udden-Wentworth grade scale (Krumbein, 1934). Dried sediment subsamples of 50-100 g, with grain sizes ranging from granules (2-4 mm) to coarse silt (0.031-0.0625 mm), were dry-sieved for 10 minutes on a mechanical sieve-shaker through a series of sieves, ranging in mesh size from -5 to +4 [phi] (32 mm-63 gm). Dried coarse silt and clay sediment (< 0.031 mm) were analyzed by wet-sieving, using masses of 5 grams. All visible shell debris and organic material were removed prior to analysis.

The video data were collected along video transects of approximately 3 min. duration using a SeaView Sea-master 600 underwater drop video camera (SeaView Video Technology, Florida) or an Amphibico Dive Buddy underwater video housing. The underwater drop video camera was bolted into an aluminum cage with a fin, lowered to the seafloor on a 45 m tether, and held approximately 0.5-1 m above the bottom. The view of the drop video camera was directly downward as the camera moved parallel to the bottom surface. The aluminum cage and fin helped keep the camera steady, preventing camera rotation, so that the camera could obtain a relatively stable image. We tried to maintain a constant speed of less than 5 km/h for each transect. The SeaView was powered with a 12-volt battery, and the video signal was recorded on a SONY TRV38 Digital "handycam" (Sony Corporation, Tokyo) with an LCD screen that doubled as a video monitor. Digital video was captured at 29.97 frames per second. The frame series for each transect was stored as an iMovie HD file, and digital enhancement (i.e., colour correction) was carried out where required to enhance clarity and contrast. Geographical position and depth were registered at the beginning and end of each transect using the Garmin 178C GPS-depth sounder. Laser beams provided a 15 cm scale for measuring approximate width of the video frame and size of the organisms and benthic features in the video images. We then viewed the video records of each transect and identified all macroalgae and fauna to the lowest possible taxon. Video analysis was especially useful for the identification of megabenthos (~1-12 cm) and for substrates with dispersed cobbles or pebbles and boulders, which often yielded no recovery in grab samples.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Sachs Harbour video sampling stations covered depths between 1 m and 39 m, with an average transect duration of 3 minutes, 20 seconds per station (SD = 1 min. 30 sec.) and a total time for the video data of 2 hours and 33 minutes. Transects of the Gjoa Haven study area covered depths between 2 and 31 m, with an average duration of 2 min., 2 sec. (SD = 21 sec.) and a total time for the video data of 1 hour and 56 minutes. To sample approximately the same depth over the duration of each video transect, transects were planned to run parallel to bathymetric contours.

Two possible limitations complicate data interpretation of the seabed using a drop video camera. First, at sites dominated by macroalgae fronds and blades, it is difficult to locate fauna in the video. Second, the drop video camera was run at a constant speed for each transect; however, with daily changes in wave surface elevation, current, and wind speed and direction, the distance (and area) covered by a transect varied considerably. Video transect length ranged from 3 m to 138 m (mean: 31 m) in Sachs Harbour and from 2 m to 75 m (mean: 37 m) in Gjoa Haven.

Substrate and Depth Classes

Total sampling for the two study areas included 142 grab sample stations and 106 video transects classified into four substrate classes (gravelly sand, sand, mud, and hypoxic mud) and two depth classes (< 10 m and > 10 m). Table 1 outlines the characteristics used for classifying each substrate class from grain size and video analysis. The substrate classified as hypoxic mud was black and had a strong odour of hydrogen sulfide.

Data Analysis

Species-accumulation curves for taxa identified in each location and in each substrate class and depth zone within each location were generated by the species-accumulation functions in PRIMER. Two indices are shown: taxon counts (Sobs) and the first-order jackknife estimator. Curve calculations were based on individual grabs. The distribution of grab species richness between locations was examined using Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample tests. Because of the variable distance and area covered by video transects, we evaluated the effect of video transect length on the total number of species recorded in each transect, using a linear regression. To account for this variability, video transect data on species richness were normalized to transect length (number of species observed per meter multiplied by a hundred). Species richness indices for normalized video transect data between locations were compared by a oneway ANOVA.

Species richness and species composition analyses were carried out on presence/absence-transformed data (Clarke and Warwick, 2001) because of the geographical difference between the two locations and variability in sample size. Data gathered by the video and the grab sampler were analyzed separately (Kostylev et al., 2001). Bray-Curtis similarity among samples was calculated on the basis of species presence/absence among the sample sites (Clarke and Warwick, 2001), using the PRIMER version 6.1.10 (Plymouth Routines Multivariate Ecological Research, PRIMER-E Ltd, Plymouth, UK). Each station was assigned to one of two locations (Sachs Harbour or Gjoa Haven), one of three substrate classes containing fauna (gravelly sand, sand, or mud; the hypoxic mud substrate was faunally barren), and one of the two depth classes. A two-way crossed analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was conducted using the two factors (location and substrate + depth) on the similarity matrix to test for differences in taxonomic composition between the two locations. Creating the combined factor (substrate + depth) removes both substrate and depth effect when testing for a location effect. Differences in substrate type and depth were tested for significance using a two-way crossed ANOSIM, which removes one or two of the factors: depth or depth + location when testing for substrate type and substrate type or substrate + location when testing for depth. The pairwise R value (R statistic) obtained gave us a relative measure of how distinct the groups were on a scale of 0 (indistinguishable) to 1 (all similarities within groups are greater than similarities between groups) (Clarke and Warwick, 2001). Resemblances among location, sediment type, and depth were graphed using multidimensional scaling (MDS). A stress value tending towards zero (< 0.1) indicates that there is good separation between the groups (classes), with no real prospect of a misleading representation (Clarke and Warwick, 2001). We identified characteristic taxa (those found with consistent high frequency in most samples) by location, sediment type, and depth, using the SIMPER procedure.

RESULTS

Species Richness

In the Sachs Harbour study area, we identified 73 taxa, of which 47% were annelids, 29% molluscs, and 15% macro-algae. The remaining 9% comprised crustaceans, echino-derms, tunicates, and a sipunculid (see Appendix). In the Gjoa Haven study area, of the 66 taxa identified, annelids accounted for 36%, macroalgae 41%, and molluscs 13%. The remaining 10% comprised crustaceans, echinoderms, tunicates, and a priapulid (see Appendix).
APPENDIX: Benthic flora and fauna occurring within
the nearshore area of southwestern Banks Island
(BI) (Sachs Harbour = SH) and southeastern
King William Island (KWI) (Gjoa Haven = GH).
New species reported for the areas are indicated.

                                                          New species

VIDEO TRANSECTS                   Feeding Mode   GH  SH    KWI    BI

Macroalgae

 Chlorophyceae

  Filamentous green              autotroph       X
  algae

 Phaeophyceae

  Fucus sp.                      autotroph       X   X   X

  Laminaria saccharina           autotroph       X   X

  Scytosiphon sp.                autotroph           X            X

  Sphacelaria sp.                autotroph       X   X

  Stictyosiphon sp.              autotroph       X   X   X        X

 Rhodophyceae

  Algal mats                     autotroph           X

  Coccotylas truncatus           autotroph       X   X   X        X

  Rhodomela sp.                  autotroph       X

Macrofauna

 Crustacea

  Hyas coarctatus                scavenger           X
  alutaceus (Brandt)

  Saduria entomon                scavenger       X   X
  (Linnaeus)

 Tunicata

  Molgula sp.                    suspension      X   X            X

 Cnidaria

  Cerianthus borealis (Verrill)  suspension      X   X

 Echinodermata

  Echinarachnius                 deposit         X   X            X
  parma (Lamarck)

  Leptasterias littoralis        carnivore       X                X

  Ophiuroidea                    carnivore       X

  Pontaster tenuispinus.         carnivore           X

  Strongylocentrotus             omnivore            X
  droebachiensis (Muller)

BENTHIC GRAB SAMPLES

Macroalgae

 Chlorophyceae

  Chaetomorpha sp.               Autotroph       X   X

  Cladophora sp.                 Autotroph       X       X

  Percursaria sp.                Autotroph       X       X

  Rhizoclonium sp.               Autotroph       X       X

  Spongomorpha sp.               Autotroph       X       X

  Ulothrix sp.                   Autotroph       X

  Urospora sp.                   Autotroph       X       X

 Phaeophyceae

  Desmarestia aculeata           Autotroph       X   X   X

  Dictyosiphon sp.               Autotroph       X       X

  Fucus sp.                      Autotroph           X   X        X

  Laminaria saccharina           Autotroph       X   X

  Petalonia sp.                  Autotroph       X       X

  Pilayella littoralis           Autotroph       X       X

  Saccorhiza sp.                 Autotroph       X       X

  Scytosiphon sp.                Autotroph       X   X            X

  Sphacelaria sp.                Autotroph       X   X

  Stictyosiphon sp.              Autotroph       X   X   X        X

 Rhodophyceae

  Audouinella sp.                Autotroph       X       X

  Ceratocolax nartzi             Autotroph           X

  Coccotylus truncatus           Autotroph       X   X   X        X

  Hildenbrandia rubra            Autotroph       X       X

  Odonthalia dentata             Autotroph       X

  Pantoneura sp.                 Autotroph       X

  Polysiphonia sp.               Autotroph       X

  Rhodomela sp.                  Autotroph       X

  Scagelia sp.                   Autotroph       X

Macrofauna

 Crustacea

  Acanthostepheia                Scavenger       X   X   X
  malmgreni (Goes)

  Diastylis rathkei                              X       X
  (Kreyer)

  Gammarus sp.                   Scavenger       X   X   X

  Saduria entomon                Scavenger       X       X
  (Linnaeus)

 Echinodermata

  Amphipholis                    deposit-feeder      X
  squamata (Delle Chiaje)

  Echinarachnius                 deposit-feeder      X
  parma (Lamarck)

APPENDIX: Benthic flora and fauna occurring within
the nearshore area of southwestern Banks Island (BI)
(Sachs Harbour = SH) and southeastern King
William Island (KWI) (Gjoa Haven = GH). New
species reported for the areas are indicated - continued:

                                                           New species

BENTHIC GRAB                     Feeding Mode     GH  SH    KWI    BI
SAMPLES

Bivalvia

  Astarte montagui               suspension        X   X    X
  (Dulwyn)

  Clinocardium                   suspension            X
  Ciliatum (Fabricius)

  Cumingia Tellinoides (Conrad)  suspension            X            X

  Ennucula tenuis                deposit-feeder    X   X    X       X
  (Montagu)

  Hiatella arctica               suspension        X   X    X
  (Linnaeus)

  Macoma calcarea                deposit-teeder        X            X
  (Omelin)

  Macoma moesta                  deposit-feeder    X   X    X       X
  (Deshayes)

  Musculus discors               suspension        X   X    X       X
  (Linnaeus)

  Mysella planulata              suspension            X            X
  (Stimpson)

  Nucula bellotti                deposit-feeder        X            X
  (Adams)

  Nucula proximo                 deposit-feeder        X            X
  (Say)

  Tellina sp.                    deposit-feeder        X            X

  Thyasira sp.                   deposit-feeder        X            X

  Turtonia minuta                suspension            X            X
  (Fabricius)

  Yoldia hyperborea              deposit-feeder    X   X    X       X
  (Gould)

Gastropoda

  Lacuna vincta                  herbivore             X            X
  (Montagu)

  Odosiomia sp.                  parasite              X            X

  Oenopota turricula             carnivore             X            X
  (Montagu)

  Retusa obtusa                  predator          X   X    X       X
  (Montagu)

  Volutopsius sp.                                      X            X

Polychaeta

  Aglaophamus                    carnivore         X   X    X       X
  neotenus (Noyes)

  Ancistrosyllis                 carnivore             X            X
  Groenlandica (Mcintosh)

  Apistobranchus                 deposit-feeder        X            X
  Tullbergi (Levinsen)

  Capitella capitata             deposit-feeder        X
  (Fabricius)

  Cossura                        deposit-feeder        X            X
  Longocirrata (Webster
  & Benedict)

  Enipo sp.                      carnivore         X   X    X       X

  Eteone sp.                     carnivore         X   X    X

  Euclymene zonalis              deposit-feeder    X        X       X
  (Verrill)

  Eumida sp.                     carnivore         X   X    X       X

  Eunice sp.                     carnivore         X   X    X

  Fabricia sahella               suspension            X            X
  (Ehrenberg)

  Goniada gigantea               carnivore             X            X
  (Verrill)

  Goniadidae                     carnivore                          X

  Harmothoe                      carnivore         X   X    X       X
  extenuata (Grube)

  Lctonice cirrata               deposit-feeder    X        X       X
  (Sars)

  Magelona sp.                   deposit-feeder        X            X

  Marenzelleria                  deposit-feeder    X        X       X
  viridis (Verrill)

  Naineris sp.                   deposit-feeder    X   X    X       X

  Nephtys sp.                    carnivore         X   X    X

  Nereis sp.                     suspension        X   X    X       X

  Nereis zonata                  suspension        X   X    X       X
  (Malmgren)

  Ophelina sp.                   deposit-feeder        X

  Ophelina acuminata             deposit-feeder        X           X
  (Orsted)

  Paralacydonia sp.              unknown               X           X

  Pectinariagouldii              deposit-feeder    X        X      X
  (Verrill)

  Phylo ornatus                  deposit-feeder        X           X
  (Verrill)

  Polycirrus medusa              deposit-feeder        X           X
  (Grube)

  Potamilla sp.                  suspension            X           X

  Praxillella                    deposit-feeder    X        X
  gracilis (Sars)

  Protodorvillea                 carnivore         X   X    X       X
  Kefersteini (Mcintosh)

  Rhodine loveni                 deposit-feeder,   X   X    X       X
  (Malmgren)

  Sabellides sp.                 suspension            X            X

  Scalibregma                    carnivore         X   X    X       X
  inflatum (Rathke)

  Scoloplos armiger              deposit-feeder    X   X    X       X
  (Muller)

  Sternaspis scutata             unknown               X            X
  (Ranzani)

  Streblospio                    deposit-feeder    X        X       X
  Benedicti (Webster)

  Terebellides                   deposit-feeder    X   X    X
  stroemi (Sars)

  Tharyx acutus                  deposit-feeder    X   X    X       X
  (Webster & Benedict)

  Travisia sp.                   deposit-feeder        X

Sipuncula

  Phascolosoma sp.               deposit-feeder        X            X

Priapulida

  Priapulus sp.                  carnivore         X        X       X

Nematoda                                           X   X    X

  Agglutinated foraminifera      deposit-feeder    X   X    X


The estimated species-accumulation curves (first-order jackknife) for grab sample data for the two locations (based on counts and taxa from individual grabs at each location) were much greater than the curves for observed taxon counts, indicating that infaunal species may have been undersampled, and no asymptote was reached for estimated or observed, indicating an incomplete census of the infauna (Fig. 5a). By contrast, species-accumulation curves for the video data for both locations (based on counts and taxa from the individual video transects at each location) were able to define the richness of epifauna and algae reasonably well (Fig. 5a). Curves for the grab samples (composed primarily of infauna) indicated higher regional species richness in Sachs Harbour (Fig. 5a). By contrast, curves for the video transect data suggested higher species richness (greater number of epifauna and algae species) in Gjoa Haven (Fig. 5a).

Macrofauna were absent from 32% of the grab samples at Sachs Harbour, compared to only 13% of those at Gjoa Haven. One, two, or three species occurred in 47% of the grab samples at Sachs Harbour and 44% of those at Gjoa Haven. The remaining 21% of the samples at Sachs Harbour contained four to ten species, and the remaining 43% at Gjoa Haven, four to nine species (Fig. 6). Sampling sites yielded no recovery with the grab sampler at six stations in Sachs Harbour and five stations in Gjoa Haven. The distribution of per-grab-sample species richness indicated greater species richness per unit area in Gjoa Haven than in Sachs Harbour (Kolmogorov-Smirnov two sample test, p = 0.022).

Visible epifauna and macroalgae were absent from 47% of the Sachs Harbour video transects, but only 9% of the Gjoa Haven video transects. No relationship was found between video transect length and species richness in Gjoa Haven ([r.sup.2] = 0.026, p = 0.310); however, a weak positive relationship was found in Sachs Harbour ([r.sup.2] = 0.286, p = 0.007). Average length-normalized species richness among video transects was significantly greater in Gjoa Haven than in Sachs Harbour (F = 8.55, p = 0.005, df = 1) (Fig. 7).

Variation in Species Richness among Substrate and Depth Classes

The species-accumulation curves for substrate classes and depth zones derived from the macrofauna grab sample data for both locations did not stabilize toward an asymptotic value for observed data (Fig. 5b, c) or estimated data (not shown), indicating an incomplete census.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Species-accumulation results for substrate classes and depth zones derived from the macroflora and macrofauna video transect data for both locations suggest that sampling was reasonably able to define the epifauna and algae species richness for each substrate class and depth zone (Fig. 5b, c). The curves indicated that the substrate with greatest species richness at Sachs Harbour was sand, while at Gjoa Haven, it was mud. For both sites, the curves indicated that species richness was greater at depths within 10 m of the surface.

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Characteristic Macroflora and Fauna of Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven

Macrobenthos differed significantly between the two study areas for both grab sample and video data (Table 2A; Fig. 8a, b). Among the grab samples, the most common macrofauna species found in the Sachs Harbour study area were carnivorous polychaetes (Nephtys sp., Eumida sp.), deposit-feeding bivalves (Thyasira sp., Macoma calcarea), and the predatory gastropod Retusa obtusa (Table 3). Algal mats consisting of brown (Phaeophyta) and green (Chlorophyta) algae (Desmarestia aculeata, Sphacelaria sp., Chaetomorpha sp.) identified from the video were the most common species of algae found within the area (Table 3). The scavenging crab (Hyas coarctatus alutaceus) and mats of red (Rhodophyta) macroalga, Coccotylus truncatus, were commonly identified in the video transects.
TABLE 2. Results of two-way crossed ANOSIM tests comparing flora,
fauna, and combined flora and fauna assemblages for (A) Sachs Harbour
and Gjoa Haven together, by location, depth class, and substrate class;
(B) Sachs Harbour and (C) Gjoa Haven separately, by depth and substrate
classes. Data represent presence or absence, with R-value at left
and/p-value in parentheses. An asterisk (*) indicates significant
difference ([alpha] = 0.05).

Location   Sampling  Number     Biota            Substrate
            method     of
                     sites

(A) SH &   Grab         103  fauna            0.059      (0.193)
GH         Video         78  flora/fauna      0.603    (0.001) *
Combined   Video         67  flora            0.298    (0.001) *
           Video         37  fauna            0.205    (0.025) *

(B) Sachs  Grab          47  fauna            0.110      (0.100)
Harbour    Video         26  flora/fauna      0.010      (0.448)
           Video         16  flora           -0.072  (0.660) (1)
           Video         26  fauna            0.074      (0.274)

(C) Gjoa   Grab          44  fauna             0.16    (0.013) *
Haven      Video         50  flora/fauna      0.273    (0.003) *
           Video         50  flora            0.286     0.001) *
           Video         18  fauna           -0.167    (100) (2)

Location                  Depth         Location

(A) SH &    0.055    (0.150)    0.243  (0.002) *
GH          0.398    (0.001) *  0.684  (0.001) *
Combined    0.288    (0.001) *  0.528  (0.001) *
            0.533    (0.001) *  0.433  (0.001) *

(B) Sachs   0.041      (0.370)
Harbour     0.187    (0.028) *
           -0.183  (0.778) (1)
            0.148      (0.219)

(C) Gjoa     0.41    (0.001) *
Haven       0.471    (0.001) *
            0.349    (0.001) *
             1.00    (0.011) *

(1) Large within-group dissimilarities compared with the
between-group dissimilarities.
(2) Ten or fewer distinct permutations; a 1% level test
is not possible, so data cannot be interpreted reliably.

TABLE 3. Characteristic taxa in Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven for grab
and video sampling methods, followed by characteristic taxa in
substrate and depth classes for each study area. CTGS (Contribution to
Total-Group Similarity, derived from SIMPER analysis) for each
characteristic taxon is given as a percentage in parentheses. No
characteristic taxa are shown for Sachs Harbour substrate classes,
since no significant differences were found.

Sachs Harbour:
Species (CTGS,
feeding mode)

                Grab analysis               Video analysis

                Nephtys sp.                 Algal mats
                (385, carnivore             (50%) Hyas
                Thyasira sp.                coarctatus
                (23%.                       Alutaceus (39%)
                deposit-feeder)             Coccotylus
                Eumida sp. (8%,             Truncatus (7%)
                carnivore)
                Retusa obtusa
                (6%, predator)
                Macoma calcarea
                (5%,
                deposit-feeder)

Depth Class

< 10 m                                      Algal mats
                                            (81%) Coccotylus
                                            Truncatus (9%)

> 10 m                                      Hyas
                                            coarctatus alutaceus
                                            (73%) Cerianthus
                                            borealis(12%)
                                            Algal mats (10%)

Gjoa Haven:
Species (CTGS,
feeding mode)

                Astarte montagui            Coccotylus
                (49%,                       truncatus
                suspension)                 (27%) Fucus
                Yoldia                      sp. (25%)
                hyperborea (27%,            filamentous
                deposit-feeder)             green algae
                Scoloplos                   (18%)
                armiger (6%,                Sphacelaria
                deposit-feeder)             sp. (14%)
                Aglaophamus
                neotenus (6%,
                carnivore)
                Laminaria
                saccharina (8%)

Depth class

< 10 m          Astarte montagui            Fucus sp.
                (36%) Scoloplos             (82%)
                armiger (35%)               Coccotylus
                Retusa obtusa               Truncatus (9%)
                (10%) Marenzelleria
                viridis (8%) Saduria
                entomon (6%)

> l0 m          Astarte montagui            filamentous
                (39%) Yoldia                green algae (45%)
                hyperborea (34%)            Cerianthus borealis
                Aglaophamus                 (21%) Coccotylus
                neotenus (13%)              Truncatus (21%)
                Praxillella gracilis        Sphacelaria sp. (8%)
                (2%) Euclymene
                zonalis (2%)

Substrate
class

Gravelly-sand   Astarte montagui            Fucus sp.
                (55%) Marenzelleria         (85%) Coccotylus
                viridis (18%) Saduria       truncatus (10%)
                entomon (15%) Retusa
                obtusa (12%)

Sand            Astarte montagui            Coccotylus
                (48%) Yoldia                truncatus (40%)
                hyperborea (31%)            Sphacelaria sp. (36%)
                Scoloplos armiger (8%)      Laminaria saccharina (16%)

Mud             Yoldia hyperborea (34%)     filamentous green algae
                Astarte montagui (28%)      (49%) Cerianthus
                Aglaophamus neotenus (25%)  borealis (23%)
                Praxillella gracilis (5%)   Coccotylus truncatus (19%)


In Gjoa Haven, the most common species among the grab samples were a suspension-feeding bivalve (Astarte montagui), a deposit-feeding bivalve (Yoldia hyperborea), a deposit-feeding polychaete (Scoloplos armiger), and a carnivorous polychaete (Aglaophamus neotenus) (Table 3). The most common species among the video transects were brown (Phaeophyta), green (Chlorophyta) and red (Rhodophyta) macroalgae (Fucus sp., filamentous green algae, Coccotylus truncatus, Sphacelaria sp., Laminaria saccharind).

Many species collected at Sachs Harbour occurred very infrequently (one of each species) at a small number of stations, and many of the samples contained no macrobenthos (Fig. 6). Nearly all of the grab sample sites (90%) and video transects (91%) that were devoid of macrobenthos were found within the broad sand sheets that dominated Thesiger Bay. These sand sheets, apparently characterized by low floral and faunal density, were found along the nearshore area, extending from just west of the sill (approximately 2 m depth) that separates the Sachs River Estuary from Thesiger Bay westward to Cape Kellett (Figs. 3, 9a). Carnivorous polychaetes (NuphtyK sp., Eumida sp.), the predatory gastropod (Retusa obtusa), and the deposit-feeding bivalve (Thyasira sp.) dominated the fauna recovered from sand sheets. Sparse mats of algae were also found within this area. Very few epifauna and no macroalage were recorded on the gravelly sand substrates south of Cape Kellett spit, and no macrobenthos were found on 50% of the gravelly sand transects (Fig. 3). To the northeast of the Cape Kellett spit, a gravelly sand bottom was present, with a diverse algal community dominated by red algae (Cerrety1uK trunratuK and Ceratocolax hartz'i) and a brown alga (Scytosiphon sp.). This area was dominated by deposit-feeding polychaetes (Scoloplos armiger, Terebellides stroemi) and Thyasira sp.

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

Beds of the tube anemone, Cerianthus horealis, were found in the deep (> 20 m) muddy substrates of the outer basin (Fig. 9b). The shallow perimeter of the inner basin was a sandy bottom covered with algal mats, consisting of Phaeophyta (Scytosiphon sp., Stictyosiphon sp., Sphacelaria sp., and Desmarestia aculeata) and Chlorophyta (Chaetomorpha sp.) (Fig. 9c), while the deepest parts of the inner basin consisted of a muddy bottom covered with algal mats and red algae Coccotylus truncatus (Fig. 9d). The carnivorous polychaete (Nephtys sp.) dominated the sandy substrates of the perimeter, while bivalves Thyasira sp. and Macoma calcarea dominated the deeper muddy substrates. The perimeters of the Sachs River Estuary basins were dominated by Coccotylus truncatus, suspension - and deposit-feeding bivalves (Hiatella arctica, Macoma calcarea) and the deposit-feeding polychaete (Terebellides stroemi) (Fig. 9e).

Hypoxic mud was found only in the Sachs Harbour study area, and only in the deep (> 40 m) submerged kettle lake basins of the-Sachs Estuary (Fig. 10). Water and black mud taken from these basins smelled strongly of hydrogen sulfide, and numerous bubbles coming from the seabed were observed in the video. Flora and fauna were absent from these sampling stations. Acoustic profiling with the Garmin 178C depth sounder in these basins showed an acoustically reflective pycnocline at about 20 m in these locations, which is likely linked to brine exclusion (Kvitek et al., 1998).

The video transects in Gjoa Haven were dominated by macroalgae and showed very few epifaunal taxa. Given the high rate of encountering macroalgae within the nearshore area (100% of the video stations), epifauna were likely hidden by the fronds and foliage of the macroalgae. Around Lund Island, a gravel bottom composed of gravelly sand and pebble cobble was present, with beds of Saccharina longicruris, Fucus sp., and Coccotylus truncatus (Fig. 9f). Beds of the tube anemone Cerianthus borealis and filamentous algae (Phaeophyta: Sphacelaria sp. and Desmarestia sp.; Rhodophyta: Polysiphonia sp. and Rhodomela sp.; Chlorophyta: Ulothrix sp.) (Fig. 9g) were found in offshore sampling sites (20-40 m depths) from around the shoal area near Betzold Point west to Fram Point. Shallow sites (< 10 m) within this region were composed of gravel and sand substrates with diverse macroalgae beds (Coccotylus truncatus, Fucus sp. and filamentous brown (Phaeophyta) algae: Dictyosiphon sp., Petalonia sp., Pilayella littoralis, Sphacelaria sp.) (Fig. 9h). The southwestern coastline of Peterson Bay was typically composed of sand, gravelly sand, and boulder-gravel with wide coverage of Saccharina longicruris, Coccotylus truncatus, and Fucus sp. Close to the river mouth, a sandy bottom was present with the tunicate Molgula sp. (Fig. 9i) and filamentous red algae (Rhodophyta: Sphacelaria sp, and Rhodomela sp.) and green algae (Chlorophyta: Ulothrix sp., Cladophora sp., Spongomorpha sp.), as well as gravelly sands with Fucus sp. beds.

Macroflora and Fauna Composition among Substrate and Depth Classes

Benthic macroflora and fauna species used in the ANO-S1M, MDS, and SIMPER analyses are presented in the Appendix. Species composition (Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven combined) differed significantly for substrate and depth classes observed in video data, but no significant differences were found in the grab sample data (Table 2A).

Species composition (flora and fauna) in Sachs Harbour sites was significantly different among depth classes for video-sampled data (Table 2B; Fig. 8c). Algal mats and Coccotylus truncates dominated the shallow (< 10 m) near-shore environment, while the Arctic lyre crab (Hyas coarctates alutaceus), northern cerianthid anemone (Cerianthus borealis), and algal mats dominated the deeper (> 10 m) areas (Table 3). Very few macrofauna observations were made in the shallow nearshore environment. Species composition did not differ significantly among depth classes for the grab sample data (Table 2B). Species composition among substrates showed no significant differences for grab or video data (Table 2B).

Species composition in Gjoa Haven sites was significantly different among substrate and depth classes for grab sampled data (Table 2C). Species composition of flora and of flora and fauna combined varied significantly among substrate and depth classes for video-sampled data (Table 2C). Faunal species composition varied significantly among depth classes, but not among substrate classes (Table 2C). Species composition (grab data) of sand substrates was variable, showing overlap with gravelly sand (R = 0.317, p = 0.052) and mud (R = 0.069, p = 0.098) substrates, while gravelly sand and mud substrates showed distinct separation between one another (R = 0.415, p = 0.049), with little to no overlap between the two classes (Fig. 8d). Species composition (video data) showed distinct separation across all three substrate classes (G [not equal to] M: R = 0.321, p = 0.015; G [not equal to] S: R = 0.211, p = 0.044; M [not equal to] S: R = 0.273, p = 0.012) (Fig. 8f). Species composition (grab and video data) showed distinct separation between shallow (< 10 m) and deeper areas (> 10 m) (Table 2C; Fig. 8e, g). In the grab sampled data, the suspension-feeding bivalve Astarte montagui was a dominant species among all substrate and depth classes, while the deposit-feeding bivalve Yoldia hyperborea was a characteristic species for deep (> 10 m) sand and mud (Table 3). The deposit-feeding polychaetes Mar enzellaria viridis and Scoloplos armiger were characteristic species for shallow (< 10 m) gravelly sand and sand substrates, respectively, while the carnivorous polychaete Aglaophamus neotenus was a characteristic species for deeper (> 10 m) mud environments (Table 3).

[FIGURE 8 OMITTED]

The video analysis, with macrofauna and flora species as attributes, was dominated by macroalgae (Table 3). Fucus sp. was the most dominant taxon observed in the gravelly sand substrate and shallow (< 10 m) depth class. The red alga Coccotylus truncatus was a dominant species among all substrate and depth classes. Filamentous green algae and the northern cerianthid anemone (Cerianthus borealis) were characteristic of muddy substrates and depths greater than 10 m. The kelp Laminaria saccharina was most commonly found on sandy substrates with dispersed cobbles and pebbles (Table 3). The brown alga Sphacelaria sp. was characteristic of water depths greater than 10 m and sandy substrates (Table 3).

[FIGURE 9 OMITTED]

DISCUSSION

Benthic marine macrofauna and flora for the Canadian Arctic nearshore environments remain relatively understudied, and fundamental knowledge on patterns of distribution in these environments is scarce. The present study is the most comprehensive investigation carried out along the nearshore area of these two coastlines. The only other benthic survey in Sachs Harbour (Siferd, 2001) collected epifauna along sampling transects using a drop video camera, SCUBA, and baited hooks and traps. Of the 26 species reported by Siferd, only nine were reported in this study, a discrepancy likely due to the variety of sampling methods used by Siferd. Earlier studies described benthic fauna collected from the southwest coast of Banks Island at the mouth of the Rufus River (Heath and Thompson, 1984) and at the tip of the Cape Kellett spit (Atkinson and Wacasey, 1989). Lee (1980) cataloged marine algae from various locations across the Canadian Arctic, including some areas around Sachs Harbour and Peterson Bay, Gjoa Haven.

The present study recorded a total of 74 species (10 macroalgae, 64 macrofauna) from southwestern Banks Island (Sachs Harbour) and 65 species (26 macroalgae, 39 macrofauna) from southeastern King William Island (Gjoa Haven) (see Appendix). Polychaete worms and bivalve molluscs dominated the benthic fauna collected by grab sampling in both Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven. Among polychaetes and molluscs, deposit feeders had the greatest species richness for Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven, and polychaetes had the greatest species diversity of all higher taxa in both study areas. Similar observations have been made in other Arctic benthic nearshore fauna studies (Lalli et al., 1973; Wacasey et al., 1979; Heath and Thomas, 1984; Thomson et al., 1986; Atkinson and Wacasey, 1989; Leontowich, 2003; Dale and Leontowich, 2006). Despite the high number of samples collected in each location, the total species richness was still not captured, as indicated by the species-accumulation curves, which did not stabilize towards asymptotic values. This failure was due to a high level of rarity within the very sparsely distributed fauna: many species were seen in only one sample, which was an artifact of undersampling. High proportions of rare species are often observed in benthic fauna and flora datasets, and thus region-specific and habitat-specific taxon accumulation curves fail to reach asymptotes (Ellingsen and Gray, 2002; Ferraro and Cole, 2007; Wlodarska-Kowalczuk et al., 2009). The assessment of the true species richness of marine benthos on habitat and regional scales is difficult to achieve even with extensive sampling (Gray, 2000). Nonetheless, the under-representation of rare species does not alter the primary taxonomic composition of the fauna and flora, which are determined by the most commonly occurring species.

[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]

Species composition differed significantly between the two study areas. Only one polychaete Family (Neph-tyidae) was a characteristic taxon of both locations. Neph-tys sp. was the predominant genus in Sachs Harbour and was most commonly found in the shallow sand environments. Aglaophamus neotenus was the dominant species in deeper muddy substrate environments in Gjoa Haven. Nephtyid polychaetes are opportunistic subsurface predators and typically inhabit sandy to muddy substrates (Rouse and Pleijel, 2001; Conlan et al., 2008). To our knowledge, only two other Arctic benthic studies have reported a nephtyid polychaete as a dominant species. Conlan et al. (2008) found Micronephtys minuta to be a characteristic species in the inshore fast ice and flaw lead regions of the Beaufort Shelf, while Dale and Leontowich (2006) found Neph-tys neotena to be a prevalent species highly abundant in the subtidal zone of Turton Bay, Igloolik Island, northwest of Foxe Basin. In Sachs Harbour, Thyasira sp. was the most common bivalve. This genus was a dominant taxon in depths greater than 100 m on the Beaufort Shelf and in the Amundsen Gulf, with no reported occurrences in the shallow flaw lead or fast ice regions of the Beaufort Sea (Conlan et al., 2008).

Given the distance between the two sites, some of the biogeographic differences observed at species level may be due to geographic position of the study area, proximity to the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific oceans, water mass origin, and relict distributions indicative of past environments (Ekman, 1953; Thorson, 1957; Lubinsky, 1980; Stewart et al., 1985).

Coastal geology and geomorphic processes likely contribute to some of the differences in species richness and species composition observed between the two sites. Coastal erosion and consequent sediment deposition or re-suspension, or both, can influence benthic ecosystems. After spring thaw and rain or storm events, the nearshore marine environment receives runoff from the land. Episodic or highly seasonal sedimentation can cause disturbance to benthos (Wlodarska-Kowalczuk and Weslawski, 2001; Wlodarska-Kowalczuk and Pearson, 2004; Wlodarska-Kowalczuk et al., 2005). Field observations indicate that the Sachs Harbour nearshore marine environment apparently receives greater amounts of sediment than Gjoa Haven.

Sachs Harbour's coastline is composed of unconsolidated sediments, ranging from silt and clays with vegetative debris to medium-to-coarse sands, and experiences thermally driven coastal erosion. During the Sachs Harbour 2005 field season, suspended particulate matter (SPM) concentrations at distances 100 m to 1000 m from shore increased significantly after a minor wind-and-rain event along the southwest coast of Banks Island (p = 0.03; aveage SPM values: 29 mg/L before event, 43 mg/L after event; Brown et al., 2005; Belliveau, 2007). Areas sampled west of the community in locations of coastal retreat, with muddier coastal soils and higher ground ice content, showed the largest increase in SPM after the wind-and-rain event (24 mg/L before, 49 mg/L after) (Belliveau, 2007). The extensive mobile sand sheets in Thesiger Bay are likely derived from coastal erosion of the sandy Sachs till (Belliveau, 2007). Overall, the rippled sand sheets support a sparse community of benthic infaunal organisms (Fig. 5a), with potentially a large species richness occurring at very low abundance. Because of undersampling of this low-density environment, it was not possible to determine the total species richness of this habitat. Conlan et al. (2008) found similar variation in macrofauna abundance and diversity in the shallow fast ice (< 20 m depth) zone of the Beaufort Shelf, where species richness was relatively high with low abundance. Wave ripples commonly observed on the underwater video transects over the shallow sand sheets indicate active sediment transport, which produces a habitat relatively hostile to most macroalgae and benthic epifauna. This active sediment transport may explain the very low within-sample diversity of flora, epifauna, and infauna observed on the mobile sand sheets. Frequent disturbance by ice scour in the shallow nearshore environment can also affect benthic community structure (Conlan et al., 2008). Muddy substrates were restricted to the deeper basins within the Sachs Estuary, and to very deep sites offshore (Siferd, 2001).

Gjoa Haven, by contrast, has a coastline composed of sand mixed with cobbles and pebbles, along with some glacial erratics, and is not experiencing coastal erosion. Here the river mouth located at the head of Peterson Bay is the main source of sediment into the marine system. Local observers in 2006 commented that mud plumes from the river occur typically during spring thaw and sometimes following minor summer rain events (B. Porter, pers. comm. 2006). The higher epibenthic species richness in Gjoa Haven than in Sachs Harbour is consistent with patterns described in northern fiord environments (Dale et al., 1989). Environments with reduced sedimentation rates and more stable substrate surfaces generally support a more stable benthic population and often have the highest densities of epibenthos (Dale et al., 1989). Although absolute abundance was not statistically comparable between Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven, the vast number (n = 52) of Sachs Harbour grab - and video-sampled sites with no biota suggests that benthic fauna and flora at this location are sparse, with many depauperate sites. Siferd (2001) also suggested that the Sachs Harbour nearshore environment (depths 0-57 m) was largely devoid of macroinvertebrates and that macro-benthos were sparse.

One principal difference between the benthos in the two locations was the presence of abundant and diverse macro-algae attached to gravel substrates to depths of 25 m and beyond in Gjoa Haven. This area demonstrated the presence of diverse macroalgae beds throughout, while in Sachs Harbour, sparse algal mats and small beds of Coccotylus truncatus were found only in the inner basin and Sachs Estuary. The different macroalgae presence and diversity observed in the two study areas is most likely the result of substrate and local environmental conditions. The lack of pebbles and cobbles in the shallow sand sheets and deeper muds in the nearshore environment of Sachs Harbour restricts macroalgae species requiring firm substrates, whereas the gravelly sand substrate located south of Cape Kellett spit was epifaunally bare, with no macroalgae, probably because the area is exposed to harsh conditions and subject to ice scouring and push ice. This area is wide open to the Beaufort Sea and showed signs along Cape Kellett spit of ice push (Bel-liveau, 2007). By contrast, pebbles and cobbles were frequently observed dispersed throughout Gjoa Haven's finer substrates, providing an attachment surface for macroalgae species. Although macroalgal diversity is generally low in Arctic areas, the numerous macroalgal species found on Gjoa Haven's mud and sandy substrata with pebbles and cobbles have been documented in other Arctic shallow coastal areas with coarse-grained sediments (Lee, 1973, 1980; Lunging, 1990; Borum et al., 2002; Hop et al., 2002).

Depth and substrate are two important factors that can affect small-scale distributions and composition of species (Wilson, 1953; Thomson, 1982; Etter and Grassle, 1992; Kostylev et al., 2001). Variation in species composition within the Gjoa Haven study area appeared to be influenced by depth and substrate.for both grab samples and video-derived data. Gjoa Haven's habitats aligned along a gradual depth gradient, with Fucus sp. covered sand and gravel substrates at the shoreline, to muddy substrates with filamentous green algae, Coccotylus truncatus, and cerianthid anemones inhabiting the deeper areas.

By contrast, Sachs Harbour showed little to no statistically significant relationship between species composition and depth or substrate factors. The only significant difference found was between species composition and depth for the video-derived data. One explanation is that 47% of the sites were faunally barren, and many sites with biota contained very low species abundance, yielding an undersam-pled flora and fauna, especially for the grab sample data. The majority of stations sampled at Sachs Harbour were on the barren, homogeneous sand sheets that dominated the nearshore environment. Numerous sites (~ 40%) sampled within this area contained no biota, and therefore a large percentage of these sites could not be included in the species composition analyses. There was also a high level of rarity within the fauna. The lack of grab replicates at each station and the narrow range of substrates and depths sampled at Sachs Harbour may also be a reason for the lack of a statistically-significant substrate or depth effect on community composition. The greatest species richness in both Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven occurred at the deepest sites with the finest sediments. Deeper, muddy environments are likely to be more stable and subject to less disturbance by sea ice and coastal erosion effects, compared to the shallow (< 10 m) depth zone. Nonetheless, the nature of the habitats sampled reflects the nature of the physical environment surrounding Sachs Harbour.

The lack of macrobenthos in the two innermost basins in the Sachs River Estuary is likely due to the hypoxic conditions at the seafloor in those basins. This study sampled hypoxic substrate (black mud smelling strongly of hydrogen sulfide) and observed numerous bubbles coming up from the seabed during the drop video transects. Siferd (2001) reported that water samples 20 m and below were much more saline than the surface water, which suggests that the process of brine exclusion had taken place. Sea-floor brine pools have been reported from bays and shallow continental shelves in the Arctic (Lewis, 1981). The formation of the evaporate mineral mirabilite (N[a.sub.2]S[O.sub.4].10[H.sub.2]O) by brine exclusion was also observed in the deep basins around Sachs Harbour, which indicates that winter formation of sea ice had cut off tidal circulation, producing a hyper-concentrated saline water body (Smith et al., 2007). In the absence of mixing, the saline water bodies could go anoxic in approximately 15 days, creating inhospitable conditions and leading to the death of benthic species (Kvitek et al., 1998). This is the only documented finding of mirabilite in the Arctic; however, mirabilite has been found in Antarctic saline and ice shelf lakes (Smith et al., 2007). The Sachs River Estuary out to the mouth of Sachs Harbour is a series of four deep basins (> 35 m), with very shallow sills (1-2 m) between each basin (Siferd, 2001). This structure greatly affects the circulation and can alter species distribution in the area. The hypoxic and most likely anoxic condition at the bottom of these basins is the result of a naturally occurring process, and given the topography of the basins, has likely existed for hundreds of years (Siferd, 2001).

This study provides a detailed description of the near-shore benthic community composition of Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven and provides a foundation for further research on nearshore benthic ecology and community structure in Arctic marine nearshore environments at depths shallower than 40 m. More research is required in nearshore Arctic environments to establish a baseline that can be used to detect future climate and anthropogenic changes to the benthic communities. If climate-warming predictions hold true, coastal erosion and resultant sedimentation into the nearshore environment would be expected to increase in Sachs Harbour. Climate warming and eustatic sea-level rise could push Gjoa Haven from emergent to submergent conditions, leading to limited coastal erosion and increased runoff during spring melt. Climate warming may allow the Northwest Passage to become a viable shipping route. If this occurs, anthropogenic impacts (e.g., petroleum pollution, tourism pollution, and the introduction of invasive species) will likely increase along Arctic coasts. Biotic consequences of these various impacts could result in change or loss of benthic species and habitat in vulnerable areas of the Canadian Arctic.

CONCLUSION

Shallow, mobile, and faunally barren sand sheets dominate the nearshore habitats of Sachs Harbour. Deep submerged kettle lake basins along the Sachs Estuary are hypoxic at depth and devoid of macrobenthos. Species richness was highest in the inner and outer basins of Sachs Harbour. Pockets of Coccotylus truncatus and algal mats were found along the shallow nearshore seabed of the Sachs Estuary and inner and outer basin. Variations in the physical and biological characteristics of the nearshore environment are likely due to the geological setting and dynamic coastal geomorphic processes, such as submergent coastline with rapid coastal erosion, complex longshore sediment transport patterns, restricted tidal circulation due to submerged kettle lake basins, and accompanying substrate and depth characteristics.

Gjoa Haven's nearshore area is characterized as a low-wave energy, microtidal, and sediment-starved environment. The nearshore environment is defined by substrate surfaces that are coarser and more stable than at Sachs Harbour, and it most likely supports a more stable benthic population. Gjoa Haven's nearshore macrobenthos varied along a depth gradient, grading from Fucus sp. covered sand and gravel substrates at the shoreline to muddy substrates with filamentous green algae, Coccotylus truncatus, and cerianthid anemones inhabiting the deeper areas. Variation between depth zones was greater than variation among substrate types.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from ArcticNet (NSERC NCE), a Northern Scientific Training Program grant, and research grants to E. Edinger from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank John Keogak (Sachs Harbour), Benjamin Porter (Gjoa Haven), Gavin Manson (Geological Survey of Canada), Dominique St-Hilaire (Memorial University), and Stephanie Papadimitriou (Memorial University) for assistance and support in the field, and Andre L. Martel (Canadian Museum of Nature) and Tara Connelly (Memorial University) for assistance with identification of taxa. We are grateful to Drs. A.E. Aitken and K.E. Conlan and an anonymous reviewer for helpful feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript. We thank the communities of Sachs Harbour and Gjoa Haven for their assistance in this project and for sharing their local knowledge.

REFERENCES

Abbott, R.T. 1974. American seashells: The marine mollusks of the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America, 2nd ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

ACIA (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment). 2005. Arctic climate impact assessment: Scientific report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1042p.

Aitken, A.E., and Fournier, J. 1993. Macrobenthos communities of Cambridge, McBeth and Itirbilung fiords, Baffin Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic 46:60-71.

Aitken, A.E., and Gilbert, R. 1996. Marine mollusca from Expedition Fiord, western Axel Heiberg Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic 49:29-43.

Aitken, A.E., Risk, M.J., and Howard, J.D. 1988. Animal-sediment relationships on a subarctic intertidal flat: Pangnirtung Fiord, Baffin Island, Canada. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 58:969-978.

Anisimov, O.A., Vaughan, D.G., Callaghan, T.V., Furgal, C, Marchant, H., Prowse, T.D., Vilhjalmsson, H., and Walsh, J.E. 2007. Polar regions (Arctic and Antarctic). In: Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., and Hanson, C.E., eds. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II Fourth Assessment Report: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 653-685.

Appy, T.D., Linkletter, L.E., and Dadswell, M.J. 1980. A guide to the marine flora and fauna of the Bay of Fundy: Annelida: Polychaeta. Fisheries & Marine Service Technical Report 920. Biological Station, St. Andrews, New Brunswick. 124 p.

Atkinson, E.G., and Wacasey, J.W. 1989. Benthic invertebrates collected from the western Canadian Arctic, 1951 to 1985. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 745. 138 p.

Barnes, R.D. 1980. Invertebrate zoology. Philadelphia: Saunders College/Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Belliveau, K. 2007. The impacts of climate change on the coastal geomorphology of southwestern Banks Island, NWT. MSc thesis, Department of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.

Bernard, F.R. 1979. Bivalve mollusks of the western Beaufort Sea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science 313. 80 p.

Blackadar, R.G. 1967. Precambrian geology of Boothia Peninsula, Somerset Island, and Prince of Wales Island, District of Franklin. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 151.

Borum, J., Pedersen, M.F., Krause-Jensen, D., Christensen, P.B., and Nielsen, K. 2002. Biomass, photosynthesis and growth of Laminaria saccharina in a High-Arctic fjord, NE Greenland. Marine Biology 141:11-19.

Bousfield, E.L. 1960. Canadian Atlantic sea shells. Ottawa: Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources Canada.

Brown, T., Edinger, E., and Hooper, R. 2005. Marine biological survey of rapidly eroding coastal environments, Sachs Harbour, NWT. ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting: Proceedings of a conference held on 13-16 December 2005 in Banff, Alberta.

Catto, N.R., and Parewick, K. 2008. Hazard and vulnerability assessment and adaptive planning: Mutual and multilateral community-researcher communication, Arctic Canada. In: Liverman, D.G.E., Pereira, C.P.G., and Marker, B., eds. Communicating environmental geoscience. Special Publication 305. London: Geological Society. 123-140.

Christie, N.D. 1975. Relationship between sediment texture, species richness and volume of sediment sampled by a grab. Marine Biology 30:89-96.

Clarke, K.R., and Warwick, R.M. 2001. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd ed. Plymouth: Primer-E.

Conlan, K., Aitken, A., Hendrycks, E., McClelland, C, and Melling, H. 2008. Distribution patterns of Canadian Beaufort Shelf macrobenthos. Journal of Marine Systems 74:864-886.

Curtis, M.A. 1972. Depth distribution of benthic polychaetes in two fiords on Ellesmere Island, N.W.T. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29:1319-1327.

---- 1975. The marine benthos of Arctic and subarctic continental shelves. Polar Record 17:595-626.

Cusson, M., Archambault, P., and Aitken, A. 2007. Biodiversity of benthic assemblages on the Arctic continental shelf: Historical data from Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 331:291-304.

Dale, J.E. 1985. Recent intertidal mollusks from the east-central coast of Ellesmere Island, Northwest Territories. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 85-18:319-324.

Dale, J.E., and Leontowich, K. 2006. Sediments and biota of the, marine coastal zone of Igloolik Island, Nunavut. Geographie physique et Quaternaire 60(l):63-80. Dale, J.E., Aitken, A.E., Gilbert, R., and Risk, M.J. 1989. Macrofauna of Canadian Arctic fjords. Marine Geology 85:331-358.

DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada). 2007. Tides, currents, and water levels: Sachs Harbour (Station # 6424); Taloyoak (Station # 6150). http://www.waterlevels.gc.ca/.

Dunton, K.H., Weingartner, T., and Carmack, E.C. 2006. The nearshore western Beaufort Sea ecosystem: Circulation and importance of terrestrial carbon in Arctic coastal food webs. Progress in Oceanography 71:363-378.

Dyke, A.S., and Dredge, L.A. 1989. Quaternary geology of the northwestern Canadian Shield. In: Fulton, R.J., eds. Quaternary geology of Canada and Greenland. Geological Survey of Canada, Geology of Canada, No. 1. 189-214.

Ekman, S. 1953. Zoogeography of the sea. London: Sidgwick and Jackson. 417 p.

Ellingsen, K., and Gray, J.S. 2002. Spatial patterns of benthic diversity: Is there a latitundinal gradient along the Norwegian continental shelf? Journal of Animal Ecology 71:373-389.

Ellis, D.V. 1960. Marine infaunal benthos in Arctic North America. Arctic Institute of North America, Technical Paper 5. 53 p.

Ellis, D.V., and Wilce, R.T. 1961. Arctic and subarctic examples of intertidal zonation. Arctic 14:224-235.

Etter, R.J., and Grassle, J.F. 1992. Patterns of species diversity in the deep sea as a function of sediment particle size diversity. Nature 360:576-578.

Fauchald, K. 1977. The polychaete worms: Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. California: Natural Museum of Los Angeles.

Fauchald, K., and Jumars, P. 1979. The diet of worms: A study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review 17:193-284.

Ferraro, S.P., and Cole, F.A. 2007. Benthic macrofauna-habitat associations in Willapa Bay, Washington, USA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 71:491-507.

Fraser, J.K., and Henock, W.E.S. 1959. Notes on the glaciation of King William Island and Adelaide Peninsula, N.W.T. Paper 22. Ottawa: Geographical Branch, Dept. of Mines and Technical Surveys.

French, H.M. 1975. Pingo investigations and terrain disturbance studies, Banks Island, District of Franklin. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 75-1A:459-464.

French, H.M., and Harry, D.G. 1988. Nature and origin of ground ice, Sandhills Moraine, southwest Banks Island, western Canadian Arctic. Journal of Quaternary Science 3:19-30.

Frost, K.J., and Lowry, L.F. 1984. Trophic relationships of vertebrate consumers in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. In: Barnes, P.W., Schell, D.M., and Reimnitz, E., eds. The Alaskan Beaufort Sea: Ecosystems and environments. New York: Academic Press. 381-401.

Gosner, K.L. 1971. Guide to identification of marine and estuarine invertebrates: Cape Hatteras to the Bay of Fundy. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 693 p.

Gotshall, D.W. 2005. Guide to marine invertebrates: Alaska to Baja California, rev. ed. California: Sea Challengers. 117 p.

Gray, J.S. 2000. The measurement of marine species diversity, with an application to the benthic fauna of the Norwegian continental shelf. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250:23-49.

Grebmeier, J.M., and Barry, J.P. 1991. The influence of oceanographic processes on pelagic-benthic coupling in polar regions: A benthic perspective. Journal of Marine Systems 2:495-518.

Harry, D.G., French, H.M., and Clark, M.J. 1983. Coastal conditions and processes, Sachs Harbour, Banks Island, Western Canadian Arctic. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie (Annals of Geomorphology), Supplement 47: Coastal and inland periglacial processes, Canadian Arctic. 1-26.

Heath, W.A., and Thomas, D.J. 1984. The impact of gravel dredging on benthos near Banks Island, Northwest Territories, 1981 and 1983. Report prepared by Arctic Laboratories Limited for Dome Petroleum Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc. 54 p. http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/gran/32640.pdf.

Helie, R.G. 1984. Surficial geology, King William Island and Adelaide Peninsula, Districts of Keewatin and Franklin, Northwest Territories. Geological Survey of Canada Map-1618A, scale 1:250,000.

Hobson, K.A., Ambrose, W.G., Jr., and Renaud, P.E. 1995. Sources of primary production, benthic-pelagic coupling, and trophic relationships within the Northeast Water Polynya: Insights from (13) C and, (15) N analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 128:1-10.

Holme, N.A., and Mclntyre, A.D. 1984. Methods for the study of marine benthos, 2nd ed. International Biological Programme Handbook 16. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Hop, H., Pearson, T., Hegseth, E.N., Kovacs, K.M., Wiencke, C., Kwasniewski, S., Eiane, K., et al. 2002. The marine ecosystem of Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polar Research 21:167-208.

Hunter, J.G., and Leach, S.T. 1983. Hydrographic data collected during fisheries activities of the Arctic Biological Station, 1960 to 1979. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 414. 87 p.

Kohn, A.J. 1983. Feeding biology of gastropods. In: Saleuddin, A.S.M., and Wilber, K.M., eds. The Mollusca, Vol. 5: Physiology, Part 2. New York: Academic Press. 2-63.

Kostylev, V.E., Todd, B.J., Fader, G.B.J., Courtney, R.C., Cameron, G.D.M., and Pickrill, R.A. 2001. Benthic habitat mapping on the Scotian Shelf based on multibeam bathymetry, surficial geology and sea floor photographs. Marine Ecological Progress Series 219:121 -137.

Krumbein, W.C. 1934. Size frequency distributions of sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 4:65-77.

Kvitek, R.G., Conlan, K.E., and Lampietro, P.J. 1998. Black pools of death: Hypoxic, brine-filled ice gouge depressions become lethal traps for benthic organisms in a shallow Arctic embayment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 162:1-10.

Lalli, C.M., Buchanan, R., Thomson, D., and Wells, F. 1973. Polar Gas preliminary environmental study: Marine ecology report. Montreal: McGill University. 98 p.

Lantuit, H., Overduin, P., Couture, N., and the ACD Group. 2009. New statistics on Arctic circumpolar coastal erosion. ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting: Proceedings of a conference held 8-11 December 2009 in Victoria, British Columbia.

Lee, R.K.S. 1973. General ecology of the Canadian Arctic benthic marine algae. Arctic 26:32-43.

----. 1980. A catalogue of the marine algae of the Canadian Arctic. Publications in Botany 9. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.

Leontowich, K. 2003. A study of the benthic faunal distribution in the subtidal zone of Turton Bay, Igloolik Island, Nunavut. MSc thesis, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan.

Lewis, E.L. 1981. Brine drainage from shallow Arctic waters. Paper presented at the American Geophysical Union, San Francisco, California. EOS 62:901.

Lubinsky, J. 1980. Marine bivalve molluscs of the Canadian central and eastern Arctic: Faunal composition and zoogeography. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 207. 111 p.

Luning, K. 1990. Seaweeds: Their environment, biogeography and ecophysiology. New York: Wiley.

Macpherson, E. 1971. The marine molluscs of Arctic Canada. Publications in Biological Oceanography 3. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.

Manson, G.K., Solomon, S.M., Forbes, D.L., Atkinson, D.E., and Craymer, M. 2005. Spatial variability of factors influencing coastal change in the western Canadian Arctic. Geo-Marine Letters 25:138-145.

Morton, B. 1983. Feeding digestion in bivalvia. In: Saleuddin, A.S.M., and Wilber, K.M., eds. The Mollusca, Vol. 5: Physiology, Part 2. New York: Academic Press. 65-147.

Papadimitriou, S. 2007. Climate-related hazards and risks to community infrastructure: Gjoa Haven, Nunavut. Unpubl. research report, Masters of Environmental Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland A 1B 3X9.

Papadimitriou, S., Catto, N., Brown, T., and Edinger, E.E. 2006. Ursuqtuq impacted by climate change: Hazards and risks to community infrastructure. In: Etkin, D., ed. 3rd Annual Symposium of the Canadian Risks and Hazards Network (CRHNet): Proceedings of a conference held 11-13 October 2006 in Montreal, Quebec.

Pettibone, M.H. 1963. Marine polychaete worms of the New England region. 1. Families Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae. Bulletin 227, Part 1. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.

Piepenburg, D. 2005. Recent research on Arctic benthos: Common notions need to be revised. Polar Biology 28:733-755.

Pocklington, P. 1989. Polychaetes of eastern Canada: An illustrated key to polychaetes of eastern Canada including the eastern Arctic. Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

Quijon, P.A. 2004. Predator regulation of sedimentary fauna in a sub-Arctic fjord ecosystem. PhD thesis, Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland.

Reimnitz, E., Marincovich, L., Jr., McCormick, M., and Briggs, W.M. 1992. Suspension freezing of bottom sediment and biota in the Northwest Passage and implications for Arctic Ocean sedimentation. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 29:693-703.

Reist, J.D., Wrona, F.J., Prowse, T.D., Power, M., Dempson, J.B., Beamish, R.J., King, J.R., Carmichael, T.J., and Sawatsky, C.D. 2006. General effects of climate change on Arctic fishes and fish populations. Ambio 35:370-380.

Rouse, G.W., and Pleijel, F. 2001. Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shaw, J., Taylor, R.B., Forbes, D.L., Ruz, M.-H., and Solomon, S. 1998. Sensitivity of the coasts of Canada to sea-level rise. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 505. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.

Siferd, T.D. 2001. Sachs Harbour benthic community survey: Summary of results 1999-2000. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2366. 45 p.

Smith, I.R., Bell, T., Forbes, D.L., and Martin, B. 2007. A hypersaline coastal marine transgressive basin with sedimentary mirabilite formation, southern Banks Island, N.W.T. ArcticNet Annual Scientific Meeting: Proceedings of a conference held 11-14 December 2007 in Collingwood, Ontario.

Snelgrove, P.V.R. 1998. The biodiversity of macrofaunal organisms in marine sediments. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1123-1132.

Solomon, S. 2001. Climate change and sea-level hazards on the Canadian Beaufort Sea coast: Project report prepared for the Climate Change Action Fund. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

--. 2005. Spatial and temporal variability of shoreline change in the Beaufort-Mackenzie region, Northwest Territories, Canada. Geo-Marine Letters 25:127-137.

Stewart, D.B., and Bernier, L.M.J. 1983. An aquatic resource survey of Victoria and King William islands, and the northeastern District of Keewatin, Northwest Territories. Lands Directorate of Environment Canada and Northern Environment Branch of Indian and Northern Affairs, Land Use Information Series, Background Report 3, 124 p. Available at Institute of Ocean Sciences (Fisheries and Oceans Canada), 9860 West Saanich Rd., PO Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia V8L. 4B2.

Stewart, P.L., Pocklington, P., and Cunjak, R. A. 1985. Distribution, abundance and diversity of benthic macroinvertebrates on the Canadian continental shelf and slope of southern Davis Strait and Ungava Bay. Arctic 38:281-291.

Syvitski, J.P.M., Farrow, G.E., Atkinson, R.J.A., Moore, PC, and Andrews, J.T. 1989. Baffin Island fjord macrobenthos: Bottom communities and environmental significance. Arctic 42:232-247.

Tarasov, L., and Peltier, W.R. 2004. A geophysically constrained large ensemble analysis of the deglacial history of the North American ice-sheet complex. Quaternary Science Reviews 23:359-388.

Taylor, R.B., and McCann, S.B. 1983. Coastal depositional landforms in northern Canada. In: Smith, D.E., and Dawson, A.G., eds. Shorelines and isostacy. London: Academic Press. 53-75.

Thomson, D.H. 1982. Marine benthos in the eastern Canadian High Arctic: Multivariate analyses of standing crop and community structure. Arctic 35:61-74.

Thomson, D.H., Martin, CM., and Cross, W.E. 1986. Identification and characterization of Arctic nearshore benthic habitats. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1434. 80 p.

Thorson, G. 1957. Bottom communities. In: Hedgpeth, J.W., ed. Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. Vol. I: Ecology. Geological Society of America, Memoir 67. 461-534.

Vincent, J.-S. 1982. The Quaternary history of Banks Island, N.W.T., Canada. Geographie physique et Quaternaire 36:209-232.

Vincent, J.-S., Occhietti, S., Rutter, N., Lortie, G., Guilbault, J.-P, and de Boutray, B. 1983. The Late Tertiary - Quaternary stratigraphic record of the Duck Hawk Bluffs, Banks Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 20:1694-1712.

Wacasey, J.W., Atkinson, E.G., and Glasspoole, L. 1979. Zoobenthos data from upper Frobisher Bay, 1967-1973. Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 164. 99 p.

Walker, K.R., and Bambach, R.K. 1974. Feeding by benthic invertebrates: Classification and terminology for paleo-ecological analysis. Lethaia 7:67-78.

Wilson, D.P. 1953. The settlement of Ophelia bicomis Savigny larvae: The 1951 experiments. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 31:413-438.

Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M., and Pearson, T.H. 2004. Soft-bottom macrobenthic faunal associations and factors affecting species distributions in an Arctic glacial fjord (Kongsfjord, Spitsbergen). Polar Biology 27:155-167.

Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M., and Weslawski, J.M. 2001. Impact of climate warming on Arctic benthic biodiversity: A case study of two Arctic glacial bays. Climate Research 18:127-132.

Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M., Pearson, T.H., and Kendall, M.A. 2005. Benthic response to chronic natural physical disturbance by glacial sedimentation in an Arctic fjord. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303:31-41.

Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M, Kuklihski, P., Ronowicz, M., Legezyhska, J., and Gromisz, S. 2009. Assessing species richness of macrofauna associated with macroalgae in Arctic kelp forests (Hornsund, Svalbard). Polar Biology 32:897-905.

T.M. BROWN, (1), (2) E.N. EDINGER, (1), (3) R.G. HOOPER (1) and K. BELLIVEAU (4)

(1.) Department of Biology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X9, Canada

(2.) Present address: Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 4B2, Canada; Tanya.Brown@dfo-mpo.gc.ca

(3.) Department of Geography, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland Al B 3X9, Canada

(4.) Environmental Science Program, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland A1B 3X9, Canada; present address: Environment Canada, Place Vincent Massey, 351 St. Joseph Boulevard, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0H3, Canada
COPYRIGHT 2011 Arctic Institute of North America of the University of Calgary
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Brown, T.M.; Edinger, E.N.; Hooper, R.G.; Belliveau, K.
Publication:Arctic
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1CANA
Date:Sep 1, 2011
Words:12939
Previous Article:Response of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) to warming climate at its altitudinal limit in northernmost subarctic Finland.
Next Article:Effects of an arctic fox visit to a Low Arctic seabird colony.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters