Printer Friendly

Behavior of lateral buds of Hancornia peciosa after cryopreservation by encapsulation-vitrification/Comportamento de gemas laterais de Hancornia speciosa apios criopreservacao por encapsulamento-vitrificacao.

Introduction

Cerrado is a complex Brazilian biome with great diversity of habitats. This rich biodiversity occupies an area over 2 million [km.sup.2], and represents about 23% of the Brazilian national territory (Klink & Machado, 2005). Several plant species of economic importance are found in this biome and many of them, if exploited consciously, have potential for the sustainable production of food and medicine (Machado, Ramos, Caldas, & Vivaldi, 2004).

The species Hancornia speciosa Gomes, popularly known as 'Mangabeira', is a native fruitful tree of the Brazilian Cerrado, belonging to Apocynaceae, and is widely distributed throughout the country, from Amapa to the state of Sao Paulo (Silva Junior, Xavier, Silva Ledo, Santos Musser, & Silva Ledo, 2007). Among the attractive characteristics of the species are its fruits that, due to its pleasant flavor, stimulate fresh consumption and can also be used in the production of syrups, juices, candy, ice cream and jams (Soares et al., 2011). Since it is an iron-rich fruit and a vitamin C source, the mangaba fruit occupies a prominent position among functional foods (Silva Junior et al., 2007). For all these characteristics, this species has been the target of predatory extraction, which has led to a decline in H. speciosa population in its native areas (Soares et al., 2011). In addition, the recalcitrance of its seeds is another detrimental factor for the availability of the species, since it prevents conventional storage and its later use (Barros et al., 2006).

Aiming to overcome the obstacles imposed by the natural characteristics of each species, germplasm conservation strategies have been used in order to prevent the extinction of these species and allow multiple genotypes to remain available for future applications (Flores, Uliana, Pimentel, & Garlet, 2013). Among the current germplasm conservation forms, cryopreservation, known to be a method for long-term conservation, ensures the viability of the biological material, with no modifications or genetic alterations for an indefinite period (Engelmann, 2011). Recently, some effort has being done to increase the conservation of H. speciosa germoplasm by means of cryopreservation using different techniques. A protocol using droplet vitrification technique (Panis, Piette, & Swennen, 2005) was successfully performed using shoot tips as explants (Santos et al., 2015). Conversely, the encapsulation-dehydration technique was unsussessfuly applied on lateral buds (Sartor, Moraes, & Almeida, 2012), showing that more studies are needed to increase the number of cryopreservation protocols of this tissue.

There are different cryopreservation techniques, and the choice of which is most appropriate will depend on the explant to be cryopreserved (Sakai & Engelmann, 2007). Encapsulation-vitrification is one of these cryopreservation techniques, which was developed based on the production of encapsulated units in the alginate matrix. This method can protect sensitive explants against harmful conditions, for example, the exposure to potentially toxic substances present in cryoprotectants used during the procedure (Subramaniam, Sinniah, Khoddamzadeh, Periasamy, & James, 2013).

During cryopreservation, the samples survival will depend on the glassy state of explants, that is, the direct transition of water from liquid to an amorphous or glassy solid (Engelmann, 2011). This process is dependent on the viscosity increment of the solution, which occurs when the solutes become more concentrated, a characteristic considered essential to prevent intracellular crystallization and membrane rupture (Fahy, MacFarlane, Angell, & Meryman, 1984). Thus, the determination of the dehydration degree necessary to prevent the onset of these effects appears to be a promising strategy for the success of cryopreservation techniques and subsequent establishment of germplasm banks (Raven & Havens, 2014).

Given the above, the aim of this study was to establish an efficient long-term conservation method through cryopreservation protocol using the encapsulation-vitrification technique for lateral buds of Hancornia speciosa.

Material and methods

Plant material

Hancornia speciosa shoots with 60 days of in vitro culture were used as a source of explants. These explants were grown in culture medium composed by Wood Plant Medium (WPM) basal salts (Lloyd & Mccown, 1980) supplemented with 8.87 [micro]M 6-benzylaminopurine (BA), 30 g [L.sup.-1] sucrose and gelled with 7 g [L.sup.-1] agar, as established by Soares et al. (2011).

Encapsulation and dehydration of lateral buds

Lateral buds, with approximately 1.0 [mm.sup.2], were excised from shoots and immersed in sodium alginate matrix (2.5% w/v). Subsequently, with the aid of an automatic pipette, the individual encapsulated units were retrieved and dripped into calcium chloride solution (Ca[Cl.sub.2].2[H.sub.2]O) (100 mM), remaining for 20 minutes for complexation procedure. The encapsulated units, individually formed by a lateral bud wrapped in sodium alginate matrix, were subjected to three washes with autoclaved distilled water to remove the excess of Ca[Cl.sub.2]. Sequentially, the encapsulated units were immersed in potassium nitrate solution (KNO3) (100 mM) for 15 minutes for decomplexation, and then washed again with autoclaved distilled water. Capsules containing the lateral buds were immersed in pre-culture liquid WPM medium added with sucrose at different concentrations (0.3; 0.75 and 1.0 M) and supplemented with 1.0 M glycerol for different incubation times (24 or 48 hours) under constant stirring of 150 rpm. Subsequently, the capsules were inoculated in regeneration medium (WPM added with 0.2 [micro]M BA) and maintained in a growth chamber with a 16 hours photoperiod, irradiance of 36 pmol [m.sup.-2] [s.sup.-1] and temperature of 25[degrees]C [+ or -] 2[degrees]C. Each treatment consisted of ten Petri dishes containing five encapsulated units per plate, randomly. After 30 days in culture, the regeneration percentage of encapsulated buds was evaluated. After the determination of sucrose optimal concentration in the pre-culture medium and the best incubation time, the capsules were subjected to two dehydration procedures: the first in an airflow hood, and the second on silica gel, both for 0, 1, 2 and 3 hours. After dehydration, the capsules were inoculated in regeneration medium (WPM supplemented with 0.2 [micro]M BA) and maintained in a growth room chamber with a 16 hours photoperiod, irradiance of 36 [micro]mol [m.sup.-2] [s.sup.-1] and temperature of 25[degrees]C [+ or -] 2[degrees]C. Each treatment consisted of ten Petri dishes containing five encapsulated units per plate, randomly. After 30 days in culture, the regeneration percentage of encapsulated buds was evaluated.

Encapsulation-vitrification

Encapsulated lateral buds were pre-cultured in liquid WPM supplemented with 0.75 M sucrose and 1.0 M glycerol, under constant stirring of 150 rpm for 24 hours, with subsequent dehydration in an airflow hood for 1 hour. The capsules were treated with Loading Solution (LS) (2.0 M glycerol + 0.4 M sucrose) for 20 minutes before immersion in Plant Vitrification Solution number 2 (PVS2), composed by 30% glycerol, 15% ethylene glycol, 15% Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.4 M sucrose (Sakai, Kobayashi, & Oiyama, 1990) at 0[degrees]C for different incubation times (0, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes). After the PVS2 treatment, the capsules were inserted into 2.0 mL cryovials and plunged into liquid nitrogen (LN), remaining for 90 minutes. Rewarming was performed in a water bath at 40[degrees]C for three minutes. Following, the capsules were then treated in a Petri dish containing Recovery Solution (RS), also known as unloading solution (1.2 M sucrose) at 25[degrees]C for 15 minutes. After cryopreservation, the capsules were inoculated in post-culture medium, consisting of WPM basal salts supplemented with 0.3 M sucrose for 24 hours in the absence of light. Subsequently, the capsules were inoculated in bud regeneration medium (WPM supplemented with 0.2 [micro]M BA). The explants were maintained in a growth room chamber with a 16 hours photoperiod, irradiance of 36 pmol [m.sup.-2] [s.sup.-1], at a temperature of 25[degrees]C [+ or -] 2[degrees]C. Each treatment consisted of ten Petri dishes containing five encapsulated units per plate, entirely at random. The variables evaluated after 30 days in culture were the percentage of survival and the percentage of shoot formation.

Statistical analysis

The collected data were statistically analyzed using SAS (Statistical Analysis System [SAS], 2001), and the means were compared by Fisher's exact probability test (p [less than or equal to] 0.05).

Results and discussion

Encapsulation-dehydration

After pre-culture of sodium alginate capsules containing the explants in liquid WPM media with different sucrose concentrations, the highest percentage of regeneration was obtained in treatment with 0.75 M sucrose after 24 hours of preculture (Figure 1).

The different dehydration conditions of alginate capsules, both in silica gel and airflow hood, showed significant differences among treatments. The highest survival percentage (78%) was observed in the explants exposed to dehydration in an airflow hood for 1h, where the capsules had a water content of 34% (Table 1).

Among pretreatment techniques described for the plant tissues cryopreservation, encapsulation-dehydration has numerous advantages, such as easy handling of the explants and a large storage capacity for fragile tissues (Sakai & Engelmann, 2007). The importance of dehydration protocols is related to reduce the water content of the plant material (Silva, Paiva, Swennen, Andre, & Panis, 2014), in order to enable tissue cooling, and prevent injuries caused by the expansion of frozen water and the formation of extra- and intracellular ice crystals (Sakai & Engelmann, 2007). Therefore, dehydration acts alleviating these critical steps and is considered one of the key points for the success of cryopreservation. Thus, the optimum water content after dehydration ranges from 20 to 30% of the total water content in the tissues (Vertucci & Farrant, 1995).

The highest recovery rate of encapsulated lateral buds after dehydration occurred at a water content around 34% (Table 1), which is considered viable for the capsules hydration levels to be cryopreserved. However, H. speciosa lateral buds seems to be more sensitive to dehydration. Successful cryopreservation was observed in shoot apices of Rabdosia rubescens encapsulated and precultured in MS culture medium with 0.4 M sucrose, in combination with 2.0 M glycerol and dehydrated for 1 hour in silica gel, reaching a water content of 21% and a recovery rate of 85% (Ai, Lu, & Song, 2012). Encapsulation -vitrification of apical meristems of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L) in PVS2 for 15 minutes and immersion in LN, ensured increased survival and recovery of explants (40%) (Fki et al., 2013). Shoot apices of Vitis vinifera encapsulated were pre-cultured in half-strength MS medium supplemented with increasing concentrations of sucrose (0.25-1.0 M) and then dehydrated in an airflow hood for different periods, in order to determine the optimum capsules dehydration time (Wang, Tanne, Arav, & Gafny, 2000). These authors found that only the shoot apices with water content lower than 22.5% survived. Wang, Laamanen, Uosukainen, & Valkonen (2005) observed that sodium alginate capsules containing apical buds of Rubus idaeus L., pre-cultured in MS medium containing sucrose, had an initial moisture content of 66%, and the water content decreased to 22.2% in the first 4 hours in an airflow hood, and to 14.3% after 8 hours of dehydration. According to these authors, the highest recovery rates of the apical buds were obtained by dehydration for at least 3 hours in an airflow hood.

Similar to the observed in the present study, the encapsulation-dehydration technology has been successfully applied in the cryopreservation of different species, such as Beta vulgaris (Vandenbussche & Proft, 1998), Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) (Paul, Daigny, & SangwanNorreel, 2000) and Citrus (Wang, Batuman, Li, BarJoseph, & Gafny, 2002). One of the advantages of this method is that the recovery of cryopreserved buds occurs directly, quickly and usually without callus formation.

Encapsulation-vitrification

The cryopreservation of lateral buds was successfully obtained with the encapsulation vitrification technique, using PVS2 incubation for 15 minutes before plunge into LN. On average, it was possible to observe 67% of explants survival (Figure 2A) and 89% of shoot formation (Figure 2B). In addition, after 15 days from the beginning of the dehydration and cryopreservation treatment, a disruption of the capsule occurred and shoots start to grow (Figure 3A-B). At the end of 60 days of cultivation, normal plants, which means possessing shoot and roots as well, were formed from encapsulated-vitrified lateral buds (Figure 3 C-E).

In the last few years, the encapsulation -vitrification technique has stood out in the cryopreservation of several species of tropical and temperate plants (Sakai & Engelmann, 2007). However, like other cryopreservation techniques, some limiting factors reduce the efficiency of this process. Osmotic stress and chemical toxicity promoted by cryoprotectants are two major problems associated with the low efficiency of this technique. One of the ways to obtaining better results is optimizing the cryoprotectant concentration before the explants immersion in LN, aiming to increase survival after the application of cryopreservation techniques (Papadopoulos et al., 2002; Castro et al., 2011).

Among the results obtained by this study, the incubation in PVS2 for 15 minutes was good enough to lead to cryoprotection in the encapsulated explants, not interfering in the capsules structure. After 30 minutes of incubation in PVS2, the capsules had a gelatinous aspect and disrupted spontaniously, which may be the probable cause of the recovery failure (Figure 2).

Recent cryopreservation studies with Hancornia speciosa lateral buds by encapsulation-dehydration technique indicated unsuccesfully regrowth rates (Sartor et al., 2012). In this case, the absence of satisfactory results may be due to the lack of adequate procedures for vitrification, combined with the wrongly rewarming of encapsulated explants at room temperature. Both mistakes may have led to intracellular ice formation by means of crystallization during cooling, and recrystallization during reawarming (Fahy et al., 1984). Vitrification procedures must be used, instead only dehydration, for sensitive tissues as Hancornia speciosa lateral buds. In this article, it was proved that encapsulation -vitrification is an adequate procedure for cryopreservation of this kind of tissue. Moreover, several studies have shown that the encapsulation -vitrification technique is quite efficient for different explants and species (Wang et al., 2000; Sakai & Engelmann, 2007: Ai et al., 2012; Fki et al., 2012).

Conclusion

This protocol describes an efficient method for cryopreservation of Hancornia speciosa germplasm by encapsulation-vitrification technique. The optimized parameters here reported enabled to obtain cryopreserved lateral buds and plants regeneration up to 67%. These results also emphasized the importance to investigating the acclimatization phase and material genetic stability after cryopreservation and ex vitro development. Besides, this study is a promising approach for cryopreservation using sensitive explants produced under in vitro conditions, and may facilitate the conservation of many other recalcitrant species.

Doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v39i1.31620

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq; Brasilia, DF--Brazil), Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG; Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil) and Coordenacao de Aperfeigoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES; Brasilia, DF--Brazil) for financial support.

References

Ai, P. F., Lu, L. P., & Song, J. J. (2012). Cryopreservation of in vitro grown shoot-tips of Rabdosia rubescens by encapsulation-dehydration and evaluation of their genetic stability. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 108(3), 381-387.

Barros, D. I., Bruno, R. D. L. A., Nunes, H. V., Cabral, G. C., Pereira, W. E., & Mendonga, R. M. N. (2006). Metodo de extracao de sementes de mangaba visando a qualidade fisiologica. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 28(1), 25-27.

Castro, S. V., Carvalho, A. D. A., da Silva, C. G., Faustino, L. R., de Figueiredo, J. R., & Rodrigues, A. R. (2011). Intracellular cryoprotant agents: Characteristics and use of ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 39(2), 957-974.

Engelmann, F. (2011). Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In Vitro & Developmental Biology, 47(1), 5-16.

Fahy, G. M., MacFarlane, D. R., Angell, C. A., & Meryman, H. T. (1984). Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology, 21(4), 407-426.

Fki, L., Bouaziz, N., Chkir, O., Benjemaa-Masmoudi, R., Rival, A., Swennen, R., ... & Panis, B. (2013). Cold hardening and sucrose treatment improve cryopreservation of date palm meristems. Biologia Plantarum, 57(2), 375-379.

Flores, R., Uliana, S. C., Pimentel, N., & Garlet, T. M. B. (2013). Sacarose e sorbitol na conservacao in vitro de Pfaffia tuberosa (Spreng.) Hicken (Amaranthaceae). Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, 4(3), 192-199.

Klink, C. A., & Machado, R. B. (2005). Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 707-713.

Lloyd, G., & Mccown, B. (1980). Use of microculture for production and improvement of Rhododendro spp. HortScience, 15(3), 416-420.

Machado, L., Ramos, M. L. G., Caldas, L. S., & Vivaldi, L. J. (2004). Selecao de matrizes e clones de mangabeira para o cultivo in vitro. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 39(5), 431-435.

Panis, B., Piette, B., & Swennen, R. (2005). Droplet vitrification of apical meristems: a cryopreservation protocol applicable to all Musaceae. Plant Science, 168(1), 45-55.

Papadopoulos, S., Rizos, D., Duffy, P., Wade, M., Quinn, K., Boland, M. P., & Lonergan, P. (2002). Embryo survival and recipient pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh or vitrified, in vivo or in vitro produced ovine blasstocysts. Animal Reproduction Science, 74(1), 35-44.

Paul, H., Daigny, G., & Sangwan-Norreel, B. S. (2000). Cryopreservation of apple (Malus X domestica Borkh.) shoot tips following encapsulation-dehydration or encapsulation-vitrification. Plant Cell Reports, 19(8), 768-774.

Raven, P., & Havens, K. (2014). Ex situ plant conservation and cryopreservation: Breakthroughs in tropical plant conservation. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 175(1), 1-2.

Sakai, A., Kobayashi, S., & Oiyama, I. (1990). Cryopreservation of nucellar cells of navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osb. var. brasiliensis Tanaka) by vitrification. Plant Cell Reports, 9(1), 30-33.

Sakai, A., & Engelmann F. (2007). Vitrification, encapsulation-vitrification and droplet-vitrification: a review. Cryo Letters, 28(3), 151-172.

Santos, P. A. A., Paiva, R., Silva, L. C., Souza, A. C., Santana, M. C., & Silva, D. P. C. (2015).

Cryopreservation of the mangaba tree (Hancornia speciosa Gomes): a protocol for long-term storage. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 37(3), 289-296.

Sartor, F. R., de Moraes, A. M., & Almeida, F. D. A. C. (2012). Tecnicas para criopreservacao de gemas de mangabeira. Revista Agrotecnologia, 3(1), 31-39.

Silva Junior, J. F., Xavier, F. R. S., Silva Ledo, C. A., Santos Musser, R., & Silva Ledo, A. (2007). Variabilidade em populagoes naturais de mangabeira do litoral de Pernambuco. Magistra, 19(1), 373-378.

Silva, L. C., Paiva, R., Swennen, R., Andre, E., & Panis, B. (2014). Cryopreservation of Byrsonima intermedia embryos followed by room temperature thawing. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 36(3), 309-315.

Soares, F. P., Paiva, R., Alvarenga, A. D., Nery, F. C., Vargas, D. P., & Silva, D. R. G. (2011). Taxa de multiplicacao e efeito residual de diferentes fontes de citocinina no cultivo in vitro de Hancornia speciosa Gomes. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, 35(1), 152-157.

Statistical Analysis System [SAS]. (2001). SAS/STAT user's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc.

Subramaniam, S., Sinniah, U. R., Khoddamzadeh, A. A., Periasamy, S., & James, J. J. (2013). Fundamental concept of cryopreservation using Dendrobium sonia protocorm-like bodies by encapsulation-dehydration technique. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(19), 3902-3907.

Vandenbussche, B., & Proft, M. P. (1998). Cryopreservation of in vitro sugar beet shoot tips using the encapsulation-dehydration technique: influence of abscisic acid and cold acclimation. Plant Cell Reports, 17(10), 791-793.

Vertucci, C. W., & Farrant, J. M. (1995). Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. In J. Kigel, & G. Galili (Eds.), Seed development and germination (p. 237-271). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.

Wang, Q., Batuman, O., Li, P., Bar-Joseph, M., & Gafny, R. (2002). A simple and efficient cryopreservation of in vitro-grown shoot tips of Troyer'citrange [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf. X Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck.] by encapsulation-vitrification. Euphytica, 128(1), 135142.

Wang, Q., Laamanen, J., Uosukainen, M., & Valkonen, J.P. (2005). Cryopreservation of in vitro-grown shoot tips of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) by encapsulation -vitrification and encapsulation-dehydration. Plant Cell Reports, 24(5), 280-288.

Wang, Q., Tanne, E., Arav, A., & Gafny, R. (2000). Cryopreservation of in vitro-grown shoot tips of grapevine by encapsulation-dehydration. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 63(1), 41-46.

Received on April 12, 2016.

Accepted on January 25, 2017.

Debora de Oliveira Prudente (1) *, Renato Paiva (1), Fernanda Carlota Nery (1), Wesley Pires Flausino Maximo (2) and Luciano Coutinho Silva (3)

(1) Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Av. Doutor Sylvio Menicucci, 1001, 37200-000, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil. (2) Departamento de Quimica, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil. (3) Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal da Paralba, Castelo Branco, Joao Pessoa, Paralba, Brazil. *Author for correspondence. E-mail: deboraoprudente@outlook.com

Caption: Figure 1. Regeneration percentage of lateral buds encapsulated in sodium alginate matrix subjected to pre-culture treatments in liquid WPM media supplemented with 0.3, 0.75 and 1.0 M sucrose for 24 or 48 hours. Means followed by the same letter do not differ between each other according to Fisher's exact test (p [less than or equal to] 0.05).

Caption: Figure 2. Explants survival percentage (a) and percentage of shoot formation (b) from lateral buds encapsulated in sodium alginate matrix after 30 days in culture, after incubation in PVS2 cryoprotectant solution for different times (0, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes), before immersion in LN. Means followed by the same letter on the bars do not differ between each other according to Fisher's exact test (p [less than or equal to] 0.05).

Caption: Figure 3. Morphological aspects of Hancornia speciosa lateral buds after cryopreservation and regeneration of plants during in vitro culture. A. Encapsulated lateral buds and pre-cultured in liquid WPM medium supplemented with 0.75 M sucrose and 1.0 M glycerol for 24 hours (Bar = 1.0 cm); B. Capsule disruption (arrow) of encapsulated -vitrificated lateral bud after 15 days in culture medium (Bar = 0.5 cm); C. Shoot regeneration after at 30 days in culture medium (Bar = 0.5 cm); D. General aspect of different capsules starting regrowth at 30 days after cryopreservation (Bar = 0.5 cm); E. Regenerated shoot cultivated in WPM medium after 60 days of cryopreservation (Bar = 1.0 cm); F. Elongation of rooted shoot on WPM medium (Bar = 1.0 cm).
Table 1. Percentage of water content and recovery of
encapsulated units of Hancornia speciosa subjected to
drying, either in silica gel or airflow hood, for
different times.

Time (hour)          Water        Recovery (%)
                  content (%)

              Airflow   Silica   Airflow   Silica

Control        99.7      99.4    85.0 aA   82.0 aA
1              34.0      33.9    78.0 bA   69.0 bB
2              23.5      9.5     16.5 cA   0.0 cB
3              11.8      8.4     0.0 dA    0.0 cA

Means followed by the same lowercase letter in the
column and uppercase letter in the row do not differ
between each other by Fisher's exact test
(pa [less than or equal to] 0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2017 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Prudente, Debora de Oliveira; Paiva, Renato; Nery, Fernanda Carlota; Maximo, Wesley Pires Flausino;
Publication:Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences (UEM)
Article Type:Ensayo
Date:Jan 1, 2017
Words:3715
Previous Article:The first finding of Ostrea cf. puelchana (Bivalvia) living as epibiont on Callinectes exasperates (Decapoda)/Primeiro registro de Ostrea cf....
Next Article:The genus Senna Mill. (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) in the Serra Geral of Licinio de Almeida, Bahia, Brazil/O genero Senna Mill. (Leguminosae:...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters