# Beam propagation factor of partially coherent Laguerre-Gaussian beams in non-kolmogorov turbulence.

I. INTRODUCTIONFor a long time, Kolmogorov's power spectrum of refractive index fluctuations has been widely accepted and shown good agreement with experimental results [1]. However, the Kolmogorov spectrum is only effective in inertial subrange. In last several decades, it has been experimentally indicated that turbulence in the upper troposphere and stratosphere deviates from predictions of the Kolmogorov model [2,3], and in the case of laser propagation along the vertical direction, the turbulence is no longer homogeneous in three dimensions, since the vertical component is suppressed [4]. Taking into account the slope variation of the atmospheric power spectrum, Toselli et al. introduced a non-Kolmogorov power spectrum [5,6] by using a generalized exponent and a generalized amplitude factor instead of a constant standard exponent value 11/3 and a constant value 0.033 associated with the conventional Kolmogorov power spectrum. The parameter "[alpha]" is the power-law for the spectrum of the index of refraction fluctuations, and the generalized power spectrum reduces to the conventional Kolmogorov spectrum when the exponent value [alpha] = 11/3 [5,6]. Based on this model, average spreading of a Gaussian beam array, spreading and direction of Gaussian-Schell model beam and second-order statistics of stochastic electromagnetic beams in non-Kolmogorov turbulence have been studied [3,7,8]. However, to our knowledge, the propagation of other types of beams in non-Kolmogorov turbulence have rarely been taken into account, even though the propagation properties of various types of laser beams in Kolmogorov turbulence have been widely studied [9-12].

Parameter properties of laser beams (such as the kurtosis parameter, [M.sup.2]-factor, polarization characteristics and scintillation, etc.) have been discussed in many publications [13-16]. Recently, the [M.sup.2]-factor is a very useful beam parameter for characterizing laser beams and can be regarded as a beam quality factor in many practical applications [17]. The [M.sup.2]-factor of partially coherent beams in free space has been studied by Gori, et al. [18,19]. Amarande [13], Zhou and Zheng [14], Baida and Luo [20] have studied beam propagation factor of flattened Gaussian beams, higher-order cosh-Gaussian beam and hard-edge diffracted cosh-Gaussian beams. Dan and Zhang have studied [M.sup.2]-factor of partially coherent flat-topped beams [21]. Yuan et al. have calculated coherent and partially coherent hollow beam propagation in Kolmogorov turbulent atmosphere [22]. Especially, Chu has investigated the Hermite-Gaussian beam quality and its beam shape under some conditions in non-Kolmogorov turbulence [23].

In this paper, the main aim is to study the propagation properties of [M.sup.2]-factor for PCLG beams in non-Kolmogorov turbulence by using the extended Huygens-Fresnel principle and second-order moments of the WDF. The analytical expression in non-Kolmogorov is derived. Some numerical examples have been discussed.

2. THEORETICAL MODEL

2.1. WDF of PCLG Beams in a Turbulent Atmosphere

The electric field distribution of LG beams at the source plane (z = 0) is given by [24]

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

where [rho] [equivalent to] (x, y) is the two-dimensional position vector in the source plane. [H.sub.2t+m-s](x) and [H.sub.2n-2t+s](x) are Hermite polynomials. [w.sub.0] is the waist width of the fundamental Gaussian beam. For the case of the beam orders m = n = 0, Eq. (1) is reduced to a fundamental Gaussian beam.

Reference [25] introduces a Gaussian term of the spectral degree of coherence. The fully coherent beam can be extended to the partially coherent one, and this type of partially coherent beam can be produced by the fully coherent beam passing through a random phase plate or a liquid crystal [21, 26]. In rectangular coordinate system, a partially coherent beam at the plane z = 0 is characterized by the cross-spectral density, which is expressed as [21, 27].

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)

where [<*>.sub.m] denotes average over the field ensemble, and [[rho]'.sub.1] and [[rho]'.sub.2] are two different point vectors in the source plane. [[sigma].sub.0] is the correlation length of the source, and H(*) is Hermite polynomial. If m = n = 0, Eq. (2) is reduced to the cross-spectral density function of GaussianSchell model beams and [[sigma].sub.0] [right arrow] [infinity], and PLG beams reduce to a coherent LG beams.

By using the paraxial form of the extended Huygens-Fresnel principle [3,7], the cross-spectral density of PCLG beams through the turbulence can be expressed as [21, 22].

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)

where k = 2[pi]/[lambda] is the wave number, [lambda] the wavelength, and term exp[-H([[rho].sub.d], [[rho]'.sub.d], z)] the effect of the turbulence. H can be written as [21,22].

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4)

where [J.sub.0] is the Bessel function of zero order, [kappa] the magnitude of the spatial wave number, and [[PHI].sub.n] the spatial power spectrum of the refractive index fluctuations of the turbulent atmosphere. To include both inner- and outer-scale effects, we use non-Kolmogorov spectrum expressed in the following form to model the atmospheric turbulence [7,28].

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (5)

where [[kappa].sub.0] = 2[pi]/[L.sub.0] and [[kappa].sub.m] = c([alpha])/[l.sub.0] with [L.sub.0] and [l.sub.0] are the turbulence outer- and inner-scale parameters, and [alpha] is the power law. In the present paper, it is supposed that [alpha] holds unchanged along the propagation path. And c([alpha]) = [[GAMMA](5 - [[alpha]/2]) A([alpha]) [2/3][pi]].sup.1/([alpha]-5)], the term [[??].sup.2.sub.n] in Eq. (5) is generalized refractive-index structure parameter with units [m.sup.3-[alpha]], and [GAMMA] denotes the gamma function. A ([alpha]) = [1/4[[pi].sup.2]] [GAMMA]([alpha] - 1) cos ([alpha][pi]/2). The spectrum expressed in Eq. (5) is reduced to conventional Kolmogorov spectrum when [alpha] = 11/3, A([alpha]) = 0.033, [L.sub.0] = [infinity], [l.sub.0] = 0 and [[??].sup.2.sub.n] = [C.sup.2.sub.n].

To evaluate Eq. (3), it is convenient to introduce new variables of integration

[rho]' = [([[rho]'.sub.1] + [[rho]'.sub.2])]/2, [[rho]'.sub.d] = [[rho]'.sub.1] - [[rho]'.sub.2]

[rho] = [([[rho].sub.1] + [[rho].sub.2])]/2, [[rho].sub.d] = [[rho].sub.1] - [[rho].sub.2]

where [[rho].sub.1], [[rho].sub.2] are two arbitrary point vectors in the receiver plane, perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the beam, and the cross-spectral density at the source plane can be expressed as

W([rho]', [[rho]'.sub.d], 0) = [GAMMA]([[rho]'.sub.1], [[rho]'.sub.2], 0) = [GAMMA] ([rho]' + [[[rho]'.sub.d]/2], [rho]' - [[[rho]'.sub.d]/2], 0) (6)

It is well known that the WDF can characterize partially coherent beams in space and in spatial frequency domain simultaneously and can be expressed in terms of the cross-spectral density W([rho], [[rho].sub.d], z) as [29, 30].

h([rho], [theta], z) = [(k/2[pi]).sup.2] [[integral].sup.[infinity].sub.-[infinity]] W ([rho], [[rho].sub.d], z) exp (- ik[theta] x [[rho].sub.d])[d.sup.2][[rho].sub.d] (7)

where vector [theta] = ([[theta].sub.x],[[theta].sub.y]) denotes an angle of propagation, and k[[theta].sub.x] and k[[theta].sub.y] are the wave vector components along the x-axis and y-axis, respectively.

On the basis of inverse Fourier transform of the Dirac delta function and its property of even function [21], we obtain

[delta]([rho]" - [rho]') = [1/[(2[pi]).sup.2]] [integral] exp [[+ or -]i[[kappa].sub.d] x ([rho]" - [rho]')][d.sup.2] [[kappa].sub.d] (8)

Then, the cross-spectral density of the beams in the source (z = 0) can be rewritten as

W([rho]', [[rho]'.sub.d], 0) = [1/[(2[pi]).sup.2]] [integral][integral] W ([rho]", [[rho]'.sub.d], 0) exp[i[[kappa].sub.d] x ([rho]" - [rho]')][d.sup.2][[kappa].sub.d][d.sup.2][rho]" (9)

Substituting Eq. (9) into Eq. (3) and using Eq. (4), we obtain

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (10)

Where

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (11)

with 1/[[epsilon].sup.2] = [1/2[w.sup.2.sub.0]] + [1/2[[sigma].sup.2.sub.0]].

Substituting Eq. (10) into Eq. (7), using Eq. (11), and performing the integration with respect to [rho]", we obtain

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (12)

where a = [1/8] [w.sup.2.sub.0] + [[z.sup.2]/[[epsilon].sup.2][k.sup.2]], b = 1/[[epsilon].sup.2] = [1/2[w.sup.2.sub.0]] + [1/2[[sigma].sup.2.sub.0]], c = -2 [1/[[epsilon].sup.2]] [z/k]. To derive Eq. (12), we have used the relations [[rho].sup.2.sub.d] = [[rho].sup.2.sub.dx] + [[rho].sup.2.sub.dy], [[kappa].sup.2.sub.d] = [[rho].sup.2.sub.dx] + [[rho].sup.2.sub.dy] and the following formula

[integral] exp(-[x.sup.2])[H.sub.m](x + y)[H.sub.n](x + z)dx = [2.sup.n] [square root of [pi]]m![z.sup.n-m] [L.sup.n- m.sub.m] (-2yz) (m [less than or equal to] n) (13)

2.2. The Angular Width and [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG Beams in Non-kolmogorov Turbulence

Based on the second-order moments of WDF, the [M.sup.2]-factor of beams can be defined as [21,22,30].

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (14)

According to definition, moments of the order [n.sub.1] + [n.sub.2] + [m.sub.1] + [m.sub.2] of WDF, it can be expressed as [24, 31].

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (15)

where

P = [integral][integral] h([rho], [theta], z)d[rho]d[theta] (16)

Substitute Eq. (12) into Eq. (15) and use Eq. (16) and formulas in [21]

[delta](s) = 1/[2[pi]] [[integral].sup.[infinity]].sub.-[infinity]] exp(-isx)dx (17)

[[delta].sup.n](s) = 1/[2[pi]] [[integral].sup.[infinity]].sub.-[infinity]] [(-ix).sup.n] exp(-isx)dx (n = 1, 2) (18)

[[integral].sup.[infinity]].sub.-[infinity]] f(x)[[delta].sup.n](x)dx = [(-1).sup.n][f.sup.n](0) (n = 1,2) (19)

After some manipulations, we obtain

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (20)

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (21)

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (22)

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (23)

where

T = [[integral].sup.[infinity].sub.0] [[PHI].sub.n]([kappa])[[kappa].sup.3]d[kappa] (24)

Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (24), the expression of T can be written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (25)

where [beta] = 2[[kappa].sup.2.sub.0] - 2[[kappa].sup.2.sub.m] + [alpha] 2[[kappa].sup.2.sub.m].

Substituting Eq. (20), Eq. (21) and Eq. (22) into Eq. (14), the expression of [M.sup.2]-factor for PCLG beams in the received plane can be expressed as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (26)

Equation (26) is the main result of this paper, which presents a powerful tool to study the [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG in the receiving plane. One can find that when [[sigma].sub.0] [right arrow] [infinity], Eq. (26) reduces to coherent [M.sup.2]-factor of LG beams, and when [[PHI].sub.n] ([kappa]) = 0, Eq. (26) can also turn into [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams in the free space.

3. NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

Now we study the numerical results of the [M.sup.2]-factor for PCLG beams on propagation by using the formula derived in above section.

Figure 1 gives the variation of the [M.sup.2]-factor and the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams on propagation in turbulent atmosphere for different [alpha]. From Fig. 1, one can see that the [M.sup.2]-factor and normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams obviously increase with the increasing propagation distance z. In other words, the beam quality decreases as the propagation distance increases. But it firstly grows and then decreases for a fixed propagation distance z with increasing on the value of [alpha].

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Figure 2 plots the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams propagating in non-Kolmogorov turbulence for different inner scale [l.sub.0] and outer scale [L.sub.0]. It is seen from Fig. 2 that the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams decreases with increasing inner scale [l.sub.0] when the propagation distance z is fixed(see Fig. 2(a)). And the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor increases with increasing outer scale [L.sub.0] (see Fig. 2(b)). The inner scale [l.sub.0], which forms the lower limit of the inertial range, has a smaller value for strong turbulence and a larger value for weak turbulence. The outer scale [L.sub.0] forms the upper limit of the inertial range and increases with the increasing strength of turbulence. The decreasing of inner scale [l.sub.0] or increasing of outer scale [L.sub.0] is equivalent to increasing the strength of the turbulence. In these cases, the laser beam will meet more turbulence cells along its propagation paths, and as a result, [M.sup.2]-factor of the beam maybe have higher value.

Figure 3 gives the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams versus propagation in non-Kolmogorov turbulence for different [[??].sup.2.sub.n]. From Fig. 3, one can see that the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beam increases with increasing of propagation distance. And it is clearly seen that for a given propagation distance the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor is smaller for PCLG beam with weaker turbulence.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Figure 4 shows the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PLG beams as a function of on propagation in non-Kolmogorov turbulence for different correlation lengths [[sigma].sub.0]. It can be shown in Fig. 4 that the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of LG beams increases with the increasing of until it reaches the maximum point. After the maximum point, the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor decreases with the increasing of [alpha]. The normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of fully coherent LG beams is worse than that of PCLG beams in atmospheric turbulent. We assume that when the power law approaches the limiting value [alpha] = 3, the function A([alpha]) approaches zero. Consequently, the refractive-index power spectral density vanishes in this limiting case. The explanation for alpha approaching 4 is that the power spectrum contains fewer eddies of high wave numbers, i.e., the wavefront tilt is the primary aberrations. So the [M.sup.2]-factor first grows and then decreases with the change of the parameter [alpha].

Figure 5 shows the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams on propagation in non-Kolmogorov turbulence for different beam orders m, n. From Fig. 5, one can see that the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor in atmospheric turbulent becomes worse for PCLG beams with lower beam orders as propagation distance z increases, i.e., the influence of a higher beam order on [M.sup.2]-factor is less affected by turbulence than that of the lower beam order.

4. CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the analytical formulas for the [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams in non-Kolmogorov turbulence has been derived by using the extended Huygens-Fresnel principle and second-order moments of the WDF. It is found that the propagation properties of the relative [M.sup.2]-factor for PCLG beams depend on beam orders, correlation length [[sigma].sub.0], inner scale [l.sub.0] and outer scale [L.sub.0]. The value of the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams is smaller for higher beam order, smaller correlation length, smaller [[??].sup.2.sub.n], smaller inner scale and bigger outer scale. And the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor of PCLG beams increases with the increasing of until it reaches the maximum point. After the maximum point, the normalized [M.sup.2]-factor decreases with the increasing of [alpha]. These results may be useful in the practical beam propagation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Jun Qu acknowledges the support by AnHui Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11040606M154 and Foundation of AnHui Educational Committee under Grant No. KJ2010A155.

REFERENCES

[1.] Hona, J., E. N. Nyobe, and E. Pemha, "Experimental technique using an interference pattern for measuring directional fluctuations of a laser beam created by a strong thermal turbulence," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 84, 289-306, 2008.

[2.] Rao, C., W. Jiang, and N. Ling, "Spatial and temporal characterization of phase fluctuations in non-Kolmogorov atmospheric turbulence," J. Mod. Opt., Vol. 47, Nos. 6, 1111-1126, 2000.

[3.] Wu, G. H., H. Guo, S. Yu, and B. Luo, "Spreading and direction of Gaussian-Schell model beam through a non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Opt. Lett., Vol. 35, Nos. 5, 715-717, 2010.

[4.] Zilberman, A., E. Golbraikh, and N. S. Kopeika, "Propagation of electromagnetic waves in Kolmogorov and non-Kolmogorov atmospheric turbulence: Three-layer altitude model," Appl. Opt., Vol. 47, Nos. 34, 6385-6391, 2008.

[5.] Toselli, I., L. C. Andrews, R. L. Phillips, and V. Ferrero, "Angle of arrival fluctuations for free space laser beam propagation through non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Proc. SPIE, Vol. 6551, Nos. 65510E, 1-12, 2007.

[6.] Toselli, I., L. C. Andrews, R. L. Phillips, and V. Ferrero, "Free-space optical system performance for laser beam propagation through non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Opt. Engineering, Vol. 47, 026003, 2008.

[7.] Zhou, P., Y. X. Ma, X. L. Wang, H. C. Zhao, and Z. J. Liu, "Average spreading of a gaussian beam array in non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Opt. Lett., Vol. 35, Nos. 7, 1043-1045, 2010.

[8.] Shchepakina, E. and O. Korotkova, "Second-order statistics of stochastic electromagnetic beams propagating through non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Opt. Express, Vol. 18, Nos. 10, 10650-10658, 2010.

[9.] Eyyuboglu, H. T. and Y. Baykal, "Analysis of reciprocity of cos-Gaussian and cosh-Gaussian laser beams in turbulent atmosphere," Opt. Express, Vol. 12, Nos. 20, 4659-4674, 2004.

[10.] Cai, Y. and S. He, "Propagation of various dark hollow beams in a turbulent atmosphere," Opt. Express, Vol. 14, Nos. 4, 1353-1367, 2006.

[11.] Eyyuboglu, H. T., C Arpali, and Y. Baykal, "Flat topped beams and their characteristics in turbulent media," Opt. Express, Vol. 14, Nos. 10, 4196-4207, 2006.

[12.] Zhu, Y., D. Zhao, and X. Du, "Propagation of stochastic Gaussian-Schell model array beams in turbulent atmosphere," Opt. Express, Vol. 16, Nos. 22, 18437-18442, 2008.

[13.] Amarande, S.-A., "Beam propagation factor and the kurtosis parameter of flattened Gaussian beams," Opt. Commun., Vol. 129, Nos. 5-6, 311-317, 1996.

[14.] Zhou, G. Q. and J. Zheng, "Beam propagation of a higher-order cosh-Gaussian beam," Optics & Laser Technology, Vol. 41, Nos. 2, 202-208, 2009.

[15.] Li, Y. Q., Z.-S. Wu, and L. G. Wang, "Polarization characteristics of a partially coherent Gaussian Schell-model beam in slant atmospheric turbulence," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 121, 453-468, 2011.

[16.] Wu, Z.-S., H.-Y. Wei, R.-K. Yang, and L.-X. Guo, "Study on scintillation considering inner- and outer-scales for laser beam propagation on the slant path through the atmospheric turbulence," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 80, 277-293, 2008.

[17.] Siegman, A. E., "New developments in laser resonators," Proc. SPIE., Vol. 1224, 2-14, 1990.

[18.] Gori, F. and M. Santarsiero, "The change of width for a partially coherent beam on paraxial propagation," Opt. Commun., Vol. 82, Nos. 3-4, 197-203, 1991.

[19.] Santarsiero, M., F. Gori, et al., "Spreading properties of beams radiated by partially coherent Schell-model sources," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 16, Nos. 1, 106-112, 1999.

[20.] Baida, L. and S. R. Luo, "Beam propagation factor of hard-edge diffracted cosh-Gaussian beams," Opt. Commun., Vol. 178, Nos. 4-6, 275-281, 2000.

[21.] Dan, Y. Q. and B. Zhang, "Beam propagation factor of partially coherent flat-topped beams in a turbulent atmosphere," Opt. Express, Vol. 16, Nos. 20, 15563-15575, 2008.

[22.] Yuan, Y. S., Y. J. Cai, J. Qu, et al., "[M.sup.2]-factor of coherent and partially coherent dark hollow beams propagating in turbulent atmosphere," Opt. Express, Vol. 17, Nos. 20, 17344-17356, 2009.

[23.] Chu, X., "Evolution of beam quality and shape of Hermite-Gaussian beam in non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 120, 339-353, 2011.

[24.] Wang, F., Y. J. Cai, and O. Korotkova, "Partially coherent standard and elegant Laguerre-Gaussian beams of all orders," Opt. Express, Vol. 17, Nos. 25, 22366-22379, 2009.

[25.] Qiu, Y. L., H. Guo, and Z. X. Chen, "Paraxial propagation of partially coherent Hermite-Gauss beams," Opt. Commun., Vol. 245, Nos. 1-6, 21-26, 2005.

[26.] Zahid, M. and M. S. Zubairy, "Directionality of partially coherent Bessel-Gauss beams," Opt. Commun., Vol. 70, Nos. 5, 361-364, 1989.

[27.] Dan, Y., B. Zhang, and P. Pan, "Propagation of partially coherent flat-topper beam through a turbulent atmosphere," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., Vol. 25, Nos. 9, 2223-2231, 2008.

[28.] Cui, L.-Y., B.-D. Xue, X.-G. Cao, J.-K. Dong, and J.-N. Wang, "Generalized atmospheric turbulence MTF for wave propagating through non-Kolmogorov turbulence," Opt. Express, Vol. 18, Nos. 20, 21269-21283, 2010.

[29.] Bastiaans, M. J., "Application of the wigner distribution function to partially coherent light," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 3, Nos. 8, 1227-1238, 1986.

[30.] Serna, J., R. Martinez-Herrero, and P. M. Mejias, "Parametric characterization of general partially coherent beams propagating through ABCD optical systems," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 8, Nos. 7, 1094-1098, 1991.

[31.] Martinez-Herrero, R., G. Piquero, and P. M. Mejias, "On the propagation of the kurtosis parameter of general beams," Opt. Commun., Vol. 115, Nos. 3-4, 225-232, 1995.

H. Luo, H. F. Xu, Z. F. Cui, and J. Qu *

Department of Physics, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, China

Received 22 October 2011, Accepted 9 December 2011, Scheduled 21 December 2011

* Corresponding author: Jun Qu (qujun70@mail.ahnu.edu.cn).

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Author: | Luo, H.; Xu, H.F.; Cui, Z.F.; Qu, J. |
---|---|

Publication: | Progress In Electromagnetics Research M |

Article Type: | Report |

Geographic Code: | 9CHIN |

Date: | Jul 1, 2012 |

Words: | 3609 |

Previous Article: | Efficient and accurate approximation of infinite series summation using asymptotic approximation and fast convergent series. |

Next Article: | Robust techniques for coherent change detection using COSMO-Skymed SAR images. |

Topics: |