Printer Friendly

Bay State blues; Scant hope of partisan balance on Beacon Hill.


Candidates' nomination papers for seats in the Massachusetts Legislature have been filed, and it's clear that voters in the nation's bluest state will be feeling even bluer this fall.

Once again, most Central Massachusetts legislators will face either no opponent or a challenge only from within their own party, guaranteeing a continuation of the unhealthy imbalance of party power on Beacon Hill.

Reflecting widespread disenchantment with both major parties, half of the state's 4 million voters decline to enroll in either. Of those who are enrolled, however, Democrats outnumber Republicans three to one.

Democrats already have overwhelming majorities in the House, where 141 of 160 members are Democrats, and the Senate, which counts just five Republicans among its 40 members.

In 2006, Republicans won just nine contested races for the Legislature, with several incumbents barely outdistancing Democratic challengers. This time around, the GOP is contesting just 58 of the 200 available legislative seats, a dismal 29 percent.

A key element of the Democrats' success has been effective party-building on the local level. Lacking an effective political farm system, the Republicans are hard-pressed to find seasoned challengers to compete effectively for legislative and statewide races. Those who do step forward have had a hard time attracting financial support for what voters often rightly conclude to be long-shot campaigns.

Some of the state's political landscape can be attributed to the power of incumbency, which transcends party affiliation. Many of the Republican legislators, after all, are firmly entrenched in their districts as well.

But the widespread voter alienation and the population losses Massachusetts has experienced in recent years - as well as the state's high cost of living and reputation as less-than-welcoming to business - cannot be wholly separated from the seven-to-one majorities that prevail for Democrats on Beacon Hill.

Massachusetts will undoubtedly remain the bluest state in the union for some time to come. While it's too early to predict whether independent-minded voters will widen or shrink the power gap this fall, the health of the state's democracy demands that they give every candidate, and particularly those in the minority party, a close look and a fair hearing.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Worcester Telegram & Gazette
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EDITORIAL
Publication:Telegram & Gazette (Worcester, MA)
Article Type:Editorial
Date:May 4, 2008
Previous Article:Sophie (Yablonski) Zablonski, 93.
Next Article:The DNA hunt; Forensic tool casts light on unsolved murders.

Related Articles
It's a draw: the political difference between new Post columnist R.J. Matson and John Sherffius is sketchy.
'You can hear God speak' in abandoned community.
The billion-dollar deficit and other Statehouse stories.
Make open government a campaign issue in endorsements: public access crosses every race.
The education of Deval Patrick.
State GOP tries to claw back from brink; Party gets dozens of candidates for House, Senate seats.
Kurt Hayes runs for open House seat.
One-Party State of Massachusetts.
Vice presidential choices could prove revealing.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters