Printer Friendly

Basic and Clinical Evidence of an Alternative Method to Produce Vivo Nanofat.

Byline: Hong-Sen. Bi, Chen. Zhang, Fang-Fei. Nie, Bo-Lin. Pan, E. Xiao

Background: Fat grafting technologies are popularly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Due to its size limitation, it is hard to directly inject untreated fat tissue into the dermal layer. Nanofat, which was introduced by Tonnard, solves this problem by mechanically emulsifying fat tissue. However, the viability of the cells was greatly destroyed. In this study, we reported a new method by 'gently' digesting the fat tissue to produce viable adipocytes, progenitors, and stromal stem cells using collagenase I digestion and centrifugation. This was named 'Vivo nanofat'. Methods: Human liposuction aspirates were obtained from five healthy female donors with mean age of 28.7 [+ or -] 5.6 years. Colony-forming assay, flow cytometry analysis, and adipogenic and osteogenic induction of the adherent cells from the Vivo nanofat were used to characterize the adipose mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). To investigate in vivo survival, we respectively injected Vivo nanofat and nanofat subcutaneously to the back of 8-week-old male BALB/c nude mice. Samples were harvested 2 days, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks postinjection for measurement, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and immunostaining. Results: Our results showed that the Vivo nanofat contained a large number of colony-forming cells. These cells expressed MSC markers and had multi-differentiative potential. In vivo transplantation showed that the Vivo nanofat had lower resorption ratio than that of nanofat. The size of the transplanted nanofat was obviously smaller than that of Vivo nanofat 4 weeks postinjection (0.50 [+ or -] 0.17 cm vs. 0.81 [+ or -] 0.07 cm, t = −5783, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Vivo nanofat may serve as a cell fraction injectable through a fine needle; this could be used for cosmetic applications.

Introduction

Fat grafting technologies are popularly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery due to their autogenous and completely biocompatible nature, and the low expenses associated with their administration. In the past decade, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were characterized,[1] and the factors affecting the long-term survival of transplanted adipose tissue and the mechanism of improving their interaction with surrounding tissues were greatly elucidated.[2] Cell viability was considered as an important factor affecting the long-term survival and regeneration of the grafted fat tissue and the nourishment of the surrounding tissues.[3],[4]

Due to the size limitation, it is hard to directly inject untreated fat tissue into the dermal layer using a very fine sharp needle for rejuvenation purposes aimed at correcting superficial rhytides, wrinkles, and atrophic scars. To overcome this disadvantage, 'nanofat' was manufactured by the mechanical emulsification of fat tissues. However, during mechanical emulsification, cell viability was markedly destroyed, which may contribute to inflammation and increased cell apoptosis.[5]

In this study, we developed a new method of emulsifying fat tissues, which not only reduced the size of the tissue but also maintained the viability of the adipose cells; enzyme digestion was used instead of mechanical emulsification.

Methods

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethics Committee of Peking University Health Science Center (No. 2017-303-02). Informed written consent was obtained from all patients before their enrollment in this study. All procedures used in this study were in accordance with our institutional guidelines that complied with the international ethics and humane standards for animal use. Every effort was made to minimize the number of animals and reduce their suffering.

Human fat cell isolation and preparation

Human liposuction aspirates were obtained from five healthy female donors with mean age of 28.7 [+ or -] 5.6 years, who underwent abdomen liposuction using a 2.4 mm diameter needle. The nanofat was prepared as described in a previous study.[5] The saline-rinsed fat tissue was mechanically emulsified by shifting the fat between two 10 ml syringes connected by Luer Lock connector. After 30 passages, the effluent was collected.

The Vivo nanofat was prepared by digesting the rinsed fat tissue with 1 ml of 0.2 mg/ml collagenase I (Sigma, Germany) resuspended to a final volume of 20 ml and incubated at 37[degrees]C for 15 min (we designed a short-time digestion process to save the viability of the adipocytes). This was then centrifuged at 330 x g for 7 min, and the supernatant fat cell fraction was collected and filtered through a cell strainer, which had a pore with 0.6 mm diameter. The effluent was collected as Vivo nanofat.

Cell viability assay

Since the adipose stem cells in the nanofat were considered trophic factors, they contributed to tissue regeneration in the injected site.[6],[7] To analyze the cell viability, trypan blue staining was performed. The total cell number per milliliter and the number of cells appearing blue were calculated. The trypan blue-stained cells were considered dead cells. The positive cell number ratio was calculated by dividing the number of trypan blue-stained cells by the total cell number.

Cell culture and differentiation

Cells collected as Vivo nanofat were seeded into a 100 mm culture dish (Corning, USA) containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium/F12 (Life Technologies Corporation, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone Fetal Bovine, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., China), penicillin G, and streptomycin sulfate (Life Technologies Corporation). Following overnight culturing at 37[degrees]C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO[sub]2 and 95% air, the unattached cells were discarded when the medium was changed. MSCs with a passage number of 3-5 were used for the following experiments. Characterizations of MSCs were also tested by osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation and MSCs-related marker staining, as described in our previous study.[8]

Osteogenic differentiation

Cells were cultured under osteogenic conditions, in the presence of 2 mmol/L [sz]-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), 100 [micro]mol/L L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Wako, Japan), and 10 nmol/L dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich) in the growth medium. After a 4-week induction, staining with 1% Alizarin Red S (Sigma-Aldrich) was performed at room temperature, to detect mineralization.

Adipogenic differentiation

For adipogenic induction, 500 nmol/L isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich), 60 [micro]mol/L indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich), 500 nmol/L hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 [micro]g/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 100 nmol/L L-ascorbic acid phosphate were added into the growth medium. After 7 days, the cells were stained with Oil Red-O (Sigma-Aldrich).

Flow cytometry

Cells were harvested at the fourth passage. After three washes with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 1% FBS, the cells were incubated in the dark for 45 min at 4[degrees]C with a fluorescein-conjugated antibody, as per the manufacturer's instructions, using BD Stemflow™ hMSC Analysis Kit (BD, USA). Flow cytometry was performed on a BD Accuri™ C6 (BD, USA).

Animal model

To investigate in vivo survival, we injected 300 [micro]l nanofat and 300 [micro]l Vivo nanofat subcutaneously to the left and right side, respectively, of the back of 8-week-old male BALB/c nude mice (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., China). The grafted tissues were harvested 2 days, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks' postinjection. In each time point, samples from five mice were harvested and then fixed with 10% formalin solution for 0.5-1.0 h and rinsed with PBS, for the following experiments. The sizes of grafted tissues harvested in 4 weeks were measured using liquid overflow method.

Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunostaining of the grafted tissue

By embedding with optimal cutting temperature, the harvested tissue was frozen at −80[degrees]C overnight. Ten micrometers thick tissue sections were cut and placed in distilled water, dipped in alum-hematoxylin solution (for 1-2 min), washed twice with tap water (10 s each), dipped in 1% ammonia solution (for 5-10 s), and then stained with eosin, and dehydrated, cleaned, and mounted. For the immunostaining of the grafted tissue, the slides were hydrated and first stained with the primary antibody against perilipin, which was used at a 1:200 dilution (Cell signaling, USA). Staining with the secondary antibody, which was fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG used at a 1:200 dilution (ZSGB-Bio, China), was then performed. Coverslips were mounted with Fluoroshield containing DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), to allow the visualization of the cell nuclei.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc. 7825 Fay Avenue, Suite 230 La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are presented as a mean [+ or -] standard deviation (SD), and paired t -test was performed to test the differences, and the normal distribution of the data was tested. Statistical significance was defined as a two-tailed P < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of Vivo nanofat

Macroscopy and microscopy of fresh isolated fat tissue were shown in [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]c. The enzyme-isolated Vivo nanofat could be smoothly injected using a 27G needle, as shown in the [Video 1]. The 'gently' digested Vivo nanofat was golden sand-like and clearly floated on normal saline [Figure 1]b, which was not observed after using the other methods of fat emulsion. Usually, 20 ml fat tissue could produce 10 ml Vivo nanofat. The size of the collected Vivo nanofat cell fraction was distributed from 10 to 70 [micro]m [Figure 1]c. The dead cell ratio was 21% [+ or -] 18% for the Vivo nanofat cell fraction, while with that of the nanofat cell fraction was 61% [+ or -] 17% ( n = 4, t = 7.626, P = 0.005) [Figure 1]d.{Figure 1}

Vivo nanofat contained more colony-forming cells

To determine which kind of nanofat contained more colony-forming cells, we seeded 0.5 ml nanofat and 0.5 ml Vivo nanofat onto 60 mm dishes. After culturing for 9 days, the number of colonies was counted. As shown in [Figure 2]a, 1% crystal violet staining showed that more colonies were formed in case of the Vivo nanofat group (38.67 [+ or -] 11.59), compared to the nanofat group (6.67 [+ or -] 1.53) ( n = 3, t = −4.918, P = 0.039). To confirm whether these colony-forming cells were MSCs, we analyzed passage four of these colony-forming cells by flow cytometry. These cells expressed CD90, CD44, CD105, and CD73 but not CD45, CD11b, CD19, HLA-DR, and CD34 [Figure 2]b. Flow cytometry analysis of nanofat was shown in [Figure 2]e. Oil red O and alizarin red staining showed that these cells also could differentiate into adipocytes and osteoblasts after induction [Figure 2]c and [Figure 2]d.{Figure 2}

High adipocyte survival after subcutaneous transplantation

To test whether the Vivo nanofat has an advantage in volumization, we transplanted 300 [micro]l of nanofat or Vivo nanofat under the skin on the back of mice; the samples were harvested 2 days, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks' posttransplantation [Figure 3]a and [Supplementary Figure 1 [SUPPORTING:1]]. The size of the transplanted nanofat in 4 weeks was obviously smaller than that of Vivo nanofat (0.50 [+ or -] 0.17 cm vs. 0.81 [+ or -] 0.07 cm) ( n = 4 in eachgroup, t = −5.783, P = 0.01). Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) staining showed that the transplanted nanofat caused tissue fibrosis, and barely any adipocytes were observed even on day 2 posttransplantation. On the other hand, in case of the transplanted Vivo nanofat, a large number of adipocytes were found to be alive on day 2, and the adipocytes on the outer layer survived even 2-week and 4-week posttransplantation [Figure 3]b. The immunofluorescent staining showed that only the adipocytes on the outermost layer of the nanofat graft were perilipin positive, while the number of perilipin-positive adipocytes on the outermost layer of the Vivo nanofat was much higher, and these adipocytes were not limited just to the outermost layer of the graft [Figure 3]c.{Figure 3}

Treatment of horizontal neck wrinkles with Vivo nanofat

The horizontal neck wrinkles are formed by the hyperkinetic activity and atrophy of the platysma muscle. To correct the neck wrinkles, we collected fat tissue and then softly digested it with collagenase I for 15-20 min at 37[degrees]C. This mixture was filtered using a strainer with a diameter of approximately 0.6 mm. A 1 ml syringe and a 27G needle were used to inject the Vivo nanofat into the dermal and subdermal areas of the neck wrinkles [Figure 4]a,[Figure 4]b,[Figure 4]c,[Figure 4]d and [Video 2]. Three patients had underwent this surgery, and when they were examined 2 weeks and 6 months after the treatment, the correction of the neck wrinkles was found to be stable [Figure 4]e.{Figure 4}

Discussion

In this study, we introduced a new, alternative method to generate the small viable adipocyte cell fraction, which could be smoothly injected using fine needles, which also contained a high number of colony-forming stromal cells with multi-differentiative potential. Nanofat, which was first reported by Tonnard, is fat tissue produced by mechanical emulsification.[5] It showed promising therapeutic effects in clinical application, due to its high stromal stem cell number and ability to be injected with a fine, sharp needle. However, in the traditional mechanical emulsification procedure, the viability of the adipocytes and the stromal stem cells was greatly destroyed, as seen in the colony-forming experiment and Mashiko et al. 's study.[9] In our study, we not only produced the Vivo nanofat fractions that were injectable with a fine needle but also greatly preserved the viability of both the adipocytes and the stromal stem cells. The MSC surface marker immunostaining and multi-differentiation results proved that these colony-forming cells in the produced fat fraction were multipotent stem cells.

In our study, we also showed that the viable nanofat cell fractions had good potential for volumization. The terminally differentiated adipocytes (big size) were fragile and easily destroyed by our enzyme digestion, while the small size adipocyte progenitors and stromal stem cells (small size) were able to survive for the use in the following experiments. In addition, the in vivo transplantation showed that the Vivo nanofat was not greatly absorbed after being subcutaneously transplanted into the back of the mice. H and E and perilipin immunofluorescences staining also showed that more viable adipocytes survived when the Vivo nanofat was used than when the nanofat was used. In our method, the concentration of collagenase I used was lower than that used for adipose stem cell isolation (normally 0.075%).[10] Besides, the digestion was done for a 15 min duration, which is only half of that used for adipose stem cells' isolation.

Neck wrinkles are caused by intradermal tissue defects, which could be improved by stromal stem cell fertilization or collagen re-volumization. The Vivo nanofat, containing both the viable stromal stem cells and the viable small size adipocytes, could correct the volume defect and stimulate soft-tissue regeneration at the same time. In our clinical cases, the correction of the neck wrinkles was found to be stable after a 6-month follow-up.

Our study highlights the importance of the Vivo nanofat in cosmetic surgery. However, the survival mechanism of the Vivo adipocytes and the stability of clinical correction after a longer follow-up period still need to be investigated in future research.

Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Chinese Medical Journal website.

Statement

We declare that our study results are repeatable.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, et al. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: Implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng 2001;7:211-28. doi: 10.1089/107632701300062859.

2. Gir P, Brown SA, Oni G, Kashefi N, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ, et al. Fat grafting: Evidence-based review on autologous fat harvesting, processing, reinjection, and storage. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:249-58. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b4d3.

3. Eto H, Kato H, Suga H, Aoi N, Doi K, Kuno S, et al. The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: Evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:1081-92. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2b19.

4. Kato H, Mineda K, Eto H, Doi K, Kuno S, Kinoshita K, et al. Degeneration, regeneration, and cicatrization after fat grafting: Dynamic total tissue remodeling during the first 3 months. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:303e-13e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000066.

5. Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Peeters G, Hamdi M, Cornelissen M, Declercq H, et al. Nanofat grafting: Basic research and clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:1017-26. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000333.

6. Bertheuil N, Varin A, Carloni R, Girard P, Chaput B. Mechanically isolated stromal vascular fraction by nanofat emulsification techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:508e-9e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003630.

7. Suga H, Eto H, Shigeura T, Inoue K, Aoi N, Kato H, et al. IFATS collection: Fibroblast growth factor-2-induced hepatocyte growth factor secretion by adipose-derived stromal cells inhibits postinjury fibrogenesis through a c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent mechanism. Stem Cells 2009;27:238-49. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0261.

8. Xiao E, Yang HQ, Gan YH, Duan DH, He LH, Guo Y, et al. Brief reports: TRPM7 senses mechanical stimulation inducing osteogenesis in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2015;33:615-21. doi: 10.1002/stem.1858.

9. Mashiko T, Wu SH, Feng J, Kanayama K, Kinoshita K, Sunaga A, et al. Mechanical micronization of lipoaspirates: Squeeze and emulsification techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:79-90. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002920.

10. Yoshimura K, Shigeura T, Matsumoto D, Sato T, Takaki Y, Aiba-Kojima E, et al. Characterization of freshly isolated and cultured cells derived from the fatty and fluid portions of liposuction aspirates. J Cell Physiol 2006;208:64-76. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20636.
COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Bi, Hong-Sen; Zhang, Chen; Nie, Fang-Fei; Pan, Bo-Lin; Xiao, E.
Publication:Chinese Medical Journal
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9CHIN
Date:Mar 18, 2018
Words:2929
Previous Article:Patient-Specific Instruments Based on Knee Joint Computed Tomography and Full-Length Lower Extremity Radiography in Total Knee Replacement.
Next Article:Acute Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation Improves Hippocampal Glucose Metabolism in Aged Mice.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters