Bans, bans, good for the heart!
Tobacco smoke--including secondhand smoke--activates blood coagulation pathways that could lead to coronary thrombosis, or heart attack. Smoke is particularly dangerous for people whose arteries are 'already hardened by age, cholesterol deposits, or smoking itself. Indeed, some 30% of heart attacks are thought directly related to smoke-induced thrombosis. In the United States, the annual direct medical cost of coronary heart disease caused by secondhand smoke alone is some $2.45 billion, according to the U.S. Society of Actuaries.
In an attempt to reduce the incidence of heart attacks and other smoking-related illnesses, Pueblo introduced a ban 1 July 2003 on smoking in all indoor public areas within the city limits. Eighteen months later the Pueblo Public Health Department instigated an observational study to determine whether the ban had had any effect on the incidence of coronary events.
"We recorded the number of heart attacks that occurred in the city for the eighteen months before and after the introduction of the ban," explains Mori Krantz, director of the Prevention Department of the Colorado Prevention Center in Denver, "and found a post-introduction fall of around twenty-seven percent. This was significantly greater than the small reduction we saw among the population living outside the city limits, and much greater than the virtually unchanged rate among residents of [adjacent] El Paso County, which does not have such an ordinance."
Similar findings were reported in an earlier study published 24 April 2004 in BMJ after a smoking ban was imposed in Helena, Montana. "Our study builds on this work by involving a sample three times as large, and suggests that these ordinances may be having a positive effect on cardiac health," says Krantz.
"This observational study is limited in that it does not distinguish between smokers and nonsmokers, and did not check the medical records of those involved," remarks Jose Ramon Banegas, a professor of preventive medicine and public health at the Universidad Autonoma in Madrid, Spain. He adds, however, that "even if the effect were half that reported, it would mean this type of ban could save many lives while reducing health spending."
Banegas points out that the results are also relevant given the new Spanish ban, enacted 1 January 2006, which still allows restaurateurs to declare their locales either smoking or nonsmoking, "Unfortunately," he says, "ninety-eight percent are scared of losing income by going smoke-free."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Environmental Health Perspectives|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2006|
|Previous Article:||The clear advantage of clean air.|
|Next Article:||International year of deserts.|