Bancroftian filariasis among the Mbembe people of Cross River state, Nigeria.
One of the most neglected tropical diseases is Lymphatic filariasis (LF). It is caused by the parasitic filarial nematode worms Wuchereria bancrofi, Brugia malayi and B. timori. Over 120 million people in at least 80 countries of the world are infected with lympathic filariasis and it is estimated that 1.2 billion (20% of the world population) are at risk of acquiring the infection (1-3). The third most endemic country in the world after India and Indonesia is Nigeria and 22.1% of the population is thought to be infected (4-7). Although, mortality from lymphatic filariasis is low, the disease is the fourth leading cause of permanent disability-adjusted life years (4). In most parts of Africa, W. bancrofti is responsible for lymphatic filariasis infection. The natural vector of lymphatic filariasis is mosquito of the Anopheles and Culex species (3,8).
The visible manifestations of the disease are severe and disfiguring lymphoedema and elephantiasis of the limbs or genitalia, hydrocele and scrotal pathology in men, recurrent infections associated with damaged lymphatic abnormalities of the renal functions occur in an estimated 44 million people (9).
The strategy of the global LF-elimination initiative is based upon mass distribution of a combined drug regimen in endemic communities to interrupt the transmission of W. bancrofti. As Nigeria begins to implement the Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Programme (LFEP), a basic problem envisaged is the dearth of information on the distribution of LF in most endemic states of the country (10). Interestingly, there are recent documented reports on the prevalence of the disease in Nigeria (11,12). Despite these works, most areas in the country are unidentified and/ or not studied. The main objective of this study was to investigate the status of the disease in some rural communities of Cross River State, Nigeria, with a view to enriching the epidemiological baseline data of the disease in Nigeria. This will strengthen the control intervention to be initiated.
Material & Methods
Study area: The study was carried out among the Mbembe people of the Obubra Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria located in the south-eastern Nigeria. This area is situated between latitudes 5[degrees]45' and 6[degrees]20' N lattitude and 8[degrees]3' and 8[degrees]32' E longitude. Six villages were selected from the Mbembe settlement for the study: Eja, Iyamitet, Iyamoyong, Ochon, Ofumbongha and Ogada. The Mbembe people are mainly farmers and specialized in the cultivation of Cassava, yams, rice and maize. This area is located in the tropical rainforest belt with high annual rainfall, high relative humidity and high mean annual temperature (13). A detailed description of the study area is given by Udoidung et al (7).
Ethical consideration: Prior to the commencement of this study, ethical clearance and permission was obtained from the Centre for Clinical Governance of the Ministry of Health, Cross River State, Nigeria. Permission was also obtained from the Paramount Ruler and the respective Village Heads of the Obubra Local Government where the investigation was undertaken. They were educated about the rationale behind the project and the need for peripheral night blood collection from their subjects. Individuals were allowed voluntary participation.
Sample collection: The respective village heads mobilized their subjects to gather in the respective Community Health Centres between 2300 and 0300 hrs. Information on each individual was obtained for age, sex, and duration of stay within the village on a standard form. Blood samples were collected during night due to the nocturnal periodicity of W. bancrofti microfilariae. A total of 897 finger prick blood samples were collected from six villages. The survey was conducted between December 2008 and June
Parasitological examination: Geimsa stained thick blood smear was used for the identification of microfilariae using binocular microscope. Microfilariae of W. bancrofti were identified based on specific morphological features and sizes as described by Cheesbrough (14). They were counted in each of the infected persons to determine the microfilarial density and recorded on the standard individual forms. The keys of Cheesbrough (14) identified and distinguished microfilariae of W. bancrofti from microfilariae of Mansonella perstans and Loa-loa if present.
Clinical examination: Persons of all age groups who presented themselves for the survey were examined by trained medical personnel (recruited for this study) for clinical examinations of LF. All males and females were examined for signs of limbs and breast elephantiasis. Males had their genitals examined for hydrocele and scrotal elephantiasis. Clinical manifestation were staged as described by McMahon et al (15).
Statistical analysis: The differences in infection rate in the communities, age and sex were analysed using chi-square test. The comparison of intensity was tested by student's t-test. All data were analysed using SPSS for windows version 10.0 (SPSS Inc Chicago, IL).
The overall percentage LF prevalence was 139 (15.5%) among the 897 samples tested, while the mean microfilarial density was 9.9 mf/50 [micro]l (Table 1). The percentage prevalence of LF varied significantly (p <0.05) within the villages and ranged from 1.38% in Ogada to 30.3% in Eja village (Table 1). Mean microfilarial density ranged from 8.8 mf/50 [micro]l in Eja to 10.9 mf/50 [micro]l in Iyamoyong (Table 1). The overall percentage prevalence for both male and female subjects was equal (15.5%) (Table 2). Mean microfilarial density for male and female subjects were 8.7 mf/50 [micro]l and 9.7 mf/50 [micro]l respectively (p >0.05). Age wise prevalence ofLF is shown in Table 3. There was no significant (p >0.05) difference in the percentage prevalence among various age groups. The prevalence of clinical manifestation of lymphatic filariasis is shown in Fig.1. Of the 897 subjects examined for clinical manifestations, 61 (6.80%) had various degrees of clinical signs. The overall prevalence of hydrocele was (9.7%). Sizes of hydrocele ranged from 4 to 30 cm with an average of 12.08 cm. Prevalence of lymphoedema was 2.3% (range 1.95-2.97%).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
In order to initiate any disease control programme based on mass drug distribution one needs to understand the geographical distribution of the disease in the affected countries, in order to know where to target mass treatment (16). The present study showed that lymphatic filariasis due to W. bancrofti is endemic amongst Mbembe people. The overall prevalence of 15.49% reported in this study is consistent with 16.9% recorded by Anosike (17) in Ebonyi State, 16.7% obtained by Badaki and Akogun (18) in Taraba State and 18.8% observed by Mba and Njoku (19) in Anambra State of Nigeria. These prevalences are likely to be underestimates, in view of the fact that the thick blood smear technique based on 45 ml of peripheral blood is not highly sensitive (20,21). However, the high prevalence of LF observed among the Mbembe people could be due to their occupational dispositions. In addition, the living conditions of the people, as most houses in the area have mud walls and thatched roofs. The houses are not ceiled and the eaves are large to permit movement of insects in and out (7). Furthermore, their proximity to various breeding sites of the vectors due to their poor environmental and unhygienic conditions might have accounted for the prevalence. All these activities and environmental conditions increase man-vector contact.
Prevalence was observed to vary between the communities in this study, the socioeconomic status and the local environmental conditions of the communities could be responsible for these variations. Similar observations have been made by Anosike et al (17) and Prakash et al (22). Understanding differences in disease rates between men and women might be helpful in understanding the pathogenesis of the disease (23).
There was no significant association between LF prevalencece and sex. This may be a reflection of the fact that both males and females engage equally in the activities involving exposure risks and common behavioural practices. In the study area men, women and children are scantily dressed and hence sustain more mosquito bites. In contrast, in few related studies (7,24), females were more infected than males.
Age-wise prevalence is consistent with previous studies (7,17,25,26) which showed that prevalence rises with age. The high prevalence recorded in 21-60 yr age group, which incidentally is the most productive age group in African traditional settings, calls for concern. The low prevalence of LF in 61-80 yr age group might be due to resistance to new infection (27). The age-wise differences may also reveal that the initially very light infections are difficult to detect with available parasitological techniques (26).
The estimation of microfilarial density (mfd) is very essential in the evaluation of control programme. The mean intensity recorded in this investigation is similar to those recorded by Anosike et al (17) and Udoidung et al (7). This varied significantly within the communities. The factors responsible for variation in microfilarial prevalence might have also contributed to the variation in intensity. There was a significant variation in the clinical presentation of filariasis within the communities. Different ecogeographical settings have different clinical presentations of the disease (28). Hydrocele is the predominant clinical manifestation observed in this study. It has been reported by Pani et al (29) that in W. bancrofti infections, genital involvement is the most common manifestations. These observations could explain the high prevalence of hydrocele recorded in this study.
In view of the public health importance of LF among the farming population of Mbembe people of Cross River State, Nigeria, urgent chemotherapy intervention is highly recommended.
We are grateful to Cross River State Ministry of Health for support and cooperation. The authors thank the village heads of the communities for mobilizing their subjects to participate in the study. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(1.) Report of a WHO informal consultation on epidemiologic approaches to lymphatic filariasis elimination: initial assessment, monitoring and certification. Geneva: World Health Organization 1998.
(2.) Wynd S, Durrheeism DN, Carron J, Selve B, Chaine JP, Leggat P, Melrose W. Socio-cultural insights and lymphatic filariasis control-lessons from the Pacific. Filarial J 2007; 5: 13. doi: 10; 1186/1475-2883-5-13.
(3.) Sahu GC, Roh FW. The quest to eliminate 4000--years-old disease lymphatic filariasis. WHO, Geneva; CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A. 2009.
(4.) Michael E, Bundy DAP, Grenfell BT. Re-assessing the global prevalence and distribution of lymphatic filariasis. Bull WHO 1996; 75: 491-503.
(5.) Eigege A, Richards FO, Blancy DD, Miri ES, Gontor I, Ogah G, Umaru J, Jinadu MY, Matthias W, Amadiegu S, Hopkins DR. Rapid Assessment for Lymphatic filariasis in Central Nigeria: a comparison of the immmunochromatographic card test and hydrocele rates in an areas of high endemicity. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2002; 68(6): 643-6.
(6.) Omudu EA, Okafor FC. Rapid epidemiological and socio-cultural appraisal of lymphatic filariasis amongst the Igede ethnic group in Bvenue State, Nigeria. Nigerian J Parasitol 2007; 28(2): 118-24.
(7.) Udoidung NI, Braide IE, Opara KN, Atting IA, Aide H. Current status of bancroftian filariasis in rural communities of the lower Cross River Basin, Nigeria. Parasitological and Clinical aspects. J Public Health 2008; 16: 383-8.
(8.) Stolk WA, de Vlas SK, Dik J, Habbema F. Advances and challenges in predicting the impact of lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes. Filaria J 2006; 5: 5.
(9.) Nwoke BEB, Dozie INS, Jiya J, Saka V, Okonkwo C, Ogidi JA, Istifanus WA, Mafiana CF, Oyene U, Amali O, Ogbu-Pearce P, Audu G, Remme H, Nutal I. The prevalence of hydrocele in Nigeria and its implication on mapping of lymphatic filariasis. Nigerian J Parasitol 2006; 27: 29-35.
(10.) Braide EI, Ikpeme B, Edet E, Atting I, Ekpo UF, Adie H, Esu B. Preliminary observation on the occurrence of lymphatic filariasis in Cross River State, Nigeria. Nigerian J Parasitol 2003; 24: 9-16.
(11.) Anosike JC, Onwurili CO. Studies on filariasis in Bauchi State, Nigeria. II: The prevalence of human filariasis in Darazo Local Government Area. Applied Parasitol 1994; 35(5): 242-50.
(12.) Terranella A, Eigege A, Jinadu MY, Miri E, Richards FO. Urban lymphatic filariasis in Central Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2006; 100(1): 1-10.
(13.) Weather Record. Calabar, Cross River State: Federal Ministry of Aviation and Meterological Agency 2009.
(14.) Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. pt 1, II edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005; p. 454.
(15.) McMahon JE, Magayuka SA, Kolstrup N, Mosha FW, Bushrod FM, Abarn DE, Bryan JH. Studies on the transmission and prevalence of bancroftian filariasis in four coastal villages in Tanzania. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1981; 75: 415-31.
(16.) Gyapong JO, Remme HF. The use of frid sampling methodology for rapid assessment of the distrbution of bancroftian filariasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001; 95: 681-6.
(17.) Anosike JC, Nwoke BEB, Ajayi EG, Onwuliri CO, Okoro OU, Oku EE, Asor JE, Amajuoyi OU, Ikpeama CA, Ogbusu FI, Meribe CO. Lymphatic filariasis among Ezza people of Ebonyi State Eastern Nigeria. Ann Agric Environ Med 2005; 12: 181-6.
(18.) Badaki JA, Akogun OB. Severe morbidity due to lymphatic filariasis in Taraba State, Nigerian. Nigerian J Parasitol 2001; 22(1&2): 105-12.
(19.) Mbah DC, Njoku OO. Prevalence of lymphatic filariasis (LF) in Ovari, Aguata Local Government Area of Anambra State, Nigeria. Nigerian J Parasitol 2002; 21: 95-102.
(20.) Southgate BA. A quantitative approach to parasitological technique in bancroftian filariasis and its effect on epidemiological understanding. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1974; 68: 177-85.
(21.) Faris R, Ramzy RMR, Gad AM, Weil GJ, Buck AA. Community diagnosis of bancroftian filariasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg1993; 87: 659-61.
(22.) Prakash G, Das TG, Prasad YN, Raj BD, Keshab P, Kumar PR. Prevalence of lymphatic filariasis in an endemic District of Nepal. J Trop Med Parasitol 2003; 26: 57-61.
(23.) Evans DB, Gelband H, Vlassoff C. Social and economic factors and the control of lymphatic filariasis: a review Acta Trop 1993; 53: 1-26.
(24.) Badaki JA, Akogun OB, Akoh JI. The effect of a low dose of ivermectin on the emergence of Wuchereria bancrofti in diurnal blood. Nigerian J Parasitol 2000; 20: 83-9.
(25.) Akogun OB. Filarisis in Gongola State Nigeria: Clinical and parasitological studies in Mutum-Biyu district. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 1991; 4: 383-93.
(26) Uttah EC, Simonsen PE, Pedersen EM, Udonsi JK. Bancroftian filariasis in the Lower Imo River Basin, Nigeria. Afr J Appl Zool Environ Biol 2004; 6: 65-75.
(27) Day KP, Gregory WF, Maizel RM. Age-specific acquisition of immunity of infective larvae in a bancroftian filariasis endemic area of Papua New Guinea. Parasit Immunol 1991; 13: 277-90.
(28) Shriram AN, Murhekar MV, Ramaiah KD, Sehgal SC. Prevalence of diurnally susperiodic bancroftian filariasis among the Nicobarese in Andaman and Nicobar Islands India: effect of age and gender. Trop Med Int Health 2002; 7(1): 949-54.
(29) Pani SP, Balakrishnan N, Srividya A, Bundy DAP, Grenfell BT. Clinical epidemiology of bancroftian filariasis: effect of age and gender. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1991; 85: 260-4.
Corresponding author: Dr K.N. Opara, Department of Zoology, University of Uyo, P.M.B. 1017, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Received: 26 November 2009
Accepted in revised form: 12 March 2010
O.E. Okon (a), C.I. Iboh (a) & K.N. Opara (b)
(a) Department of Zoology & Environmental Biology, University of Calabar, Calabar, (b) Department of Zoology, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria
Table 1. Prevalence and mean intensity of lymphatic filariasis (LF) due to Wuchereria bancrofti per village among Mbembe people of Cross River State Villages No. of No. positive Mean sampled individuals for LF mf/50 [micro]l examined (%) Eja 188 57 (30.3) 8.8 Iyamitet 178 36 (20.2) 9.9 Iyamoyong 154 16 (10.4) 10.9 Ochon 101 12 (11.9) 10.8 Ofumbongha 120 16 (13.3) 9.7 Ogada 156 2 (1.3) 9.5 Total 897 139 (15.5) 9.9 Table 2. Prevalence and mean intensity of lymphatic filariasis (LF) due to W. bancrofti microfilariaemia with relation to sex and village among Mbembe people of Cross River State, Nigeria Villages Total number of Number (%) sampled individuals infected examined Male Female Male Female Eja 73 115 20 (27.4) 37 (32.2) Iyamitet 82 96 21 (25.6) 15 (15.6) Iyamoyong 86 68 6 (6.9) 10 (14.7) Ochon 48 53 8 (16.7) 4 (7.6) Ofumbongha 65 55 9 (13.9) 7 (12.7) Ogada 58 98 0 (0.00) 2 (2.0) Total 412 485 64 (15.5) 75 (15.5) Villages Mean microfilarial density sampled mf/50 [micro]l Male Female Eja 9.8 8.3 Iyamitet 9.6 9.8 Iyamoyong 12.1 10.2 Ochon 10.5 11.5 Ofumbongha 10.1 9.0 Ogada 0.0 9.5 Total 8.7 9.7 Table 3. Prevalence (%) of W. bancrofti infection by age in Mbembe, Cross River State (6 communities combined) Age No. of No. positive range individuals for LF examined (%) 1-20 201 19 (9.5) 21-40 419 72 (17.2) 41-60 341 42 (17.4) 61-80 36 6 (16.7) Total 897 139 (15.5)
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Okon, O.E.; Iboh, C.I.; Opara, K.N.|
|Publication:||Journal of Vector Borne Diseases|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2010|
|Previous Article:||Plasmodium vivax merozoite surface protein-3[alpha]: a high-resolution marker for genetic diversity studies.|
|Next Article:||Effectiveness of Diflubenzuron in the control of houseflies.|