Printer Friendly

Balance, not silence.

Dear editor,

A moratorium would not be appropriate m terms of journalistic ethics. So long as the editorial judgment is that it is news and worthy of coverage elsewhere in the paper, that coverage should include letters to the editor. If the Journal is going to cover the story, then the views expressed in the letters to the editor--the good, the bad, and the ugly (and I wish there were more of the first kind!)--are part of the story. A newspaper is about balance, not silence!

While you want to maintain fairness and balance, no newspaper is obliged to print every letter it receives. Perhaps the policy going forward should be that you will print letters that have something new or different to say, either in terms of argument or in terms of personal experience or feelings about the issue.

Ian Henderson

COPYRIGHT 2007 General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS
Author:Henderson, Ian
Publication:Anglican Journal
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Nov 1, 2007
Previous Article:No: do not cut off anyone involved in this debate.
Next Article:Limit published letters.

Related Articles
Apprentice printer.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters