BOLTON DISCREPANCIES AMONG DIFFERENT CLASSES OF MALOCCLUSION IN PESHAWAR POPULATION.
For proper alignment and good interdigitation at the end of orthodontic treatment the tooth size should be in harmony in both dental arches to achieve normal overjet and overbite. Bolton's analysis should be taken into consideration when diagnosing treatment planning and predicting prognosis in clinical orthodontics. Many other methods have been devised to estimate tooth size discrepancy but Bolton's analysis is still widely used in clinical practice. A sample of 90 patients with age rang- ing from 1 to 0 years were included in the study. The greatest mesiodistal width of each tooth in maxillary and mandibular arches (except for second and third molar) was measured using manual vernier caliper. Each tooth was measured twice from right first permanent molar to left fist permanent molar in each arch. The readings were then used to compute the anterior and overall Bolton's ratios for each patient. The mean age was 20.752.9. Female to male ratio was 1.17:1.
No statistical signif- icant differences were present among different malocclusion groups with P-value of 0.8 for anterior ratio and for 0.122 overall ratio. There were no significant difference among males and females with P-value of 0.61 for anterior ratio and 0.592 for overall ratio.
Key Words: Orthodontic treatment overjet overbite Bolton's analysis.
For proper alignment and good interdigitation at the end of orthodontic treatment the teeth sizes should be in harmony in both dental arches.1 Specific dimension relationship must exist between maxillary and mandibular teeth to ensure proper interdigitation overjet and overbite.2 Discrepancy in tooth size should be known early during the initial diagnosis and treat- ment stages if perfect results in orthodontics finishing are to be obtained. Although natural teeth match very well in most individuals approximately 5% population has some degree of tooth size discrepancy (TSD).
Variations in the size of teeth could lead to malocclu- sion.4 Different means and tables were developed for mesiodistal dimensions of teeth by G.V Black's study and were further modified by different authors.5-8 Few studies in literature have correlated malocclu- sion with tooth size discrepancy.9 In some studies no significant difference in incidence of tooth size discrep- ancies for overall and anterior ratio has found.1011 But in Brazilian population angle class I and III malocclu- sion subjects showed greater prevalence of tooth size discrepancy than angle class II malocclusion subjects.
Some studies has shown greater incidence of TSD in angle class III malocclusion followed by class I and then class II.114 Ta et al15 reported that Bolton standard is applicable to class I occlusion in Chinese children but not to class II or class III.
Specific ratios of mesiodistal widths must exist between maxillary and mandibular teeth to obtain optimum occlusion.16 The variations greater than 2 SD of the normal ratios is considered clinically significant Nef7 developed a ratio between sum of mesiodistal widths of maxillary and mandibular teeth. A ratio of 1.20 to 1.22 was considered normal. Many other methods have been devised to estimate tooth size discrepancy but Bolton's analysis is still widely used.19-21 Bolton's analysis should be taken into con- sideration when diagnosing treatment planning and predicting prognosis in clinical orthodontics.
The objective of this study was to determine the Bolton's discrepancy among different groups of malocclusion.
In this cross-sectional study a sample size of 90 patients age ranged from 1 to 0 years were analyzed prior to orthodontic treatment. Subjects were selected randomly from patients reported at Orthodontic depart- ment of Khyber College of Dentistry Peshawar. The inclusion criterion was; (1) Study cast casts which are of good quality. (2) All the permanent teeth to be fully erupted except for the third molars. () No mesiodistal and occlusal abrasions. (4) No proximal caries or prox- imal fillings. (5) No crown and bridge restorations. (6) No supernumerary teeth or dental malformations. (7) No history of previous orthodontic treatment.
The sample was divided into three groups: Group 1 with angle class I malocclusion (n=0) Group 2 with angle class II malocclusion (n=0) and Group with angle class III malocclusion (n=0).
A thorough examination of all the study casts was done. The greatest mesiodistal width of each tooth in maxillary and mandibular arches (except for second and third molar) was measured using manual vernier caliper. Each tooth was measured twice from right first permanent molar to left fist permanent molar in each arch.2 An average of 10 casts were measured per day to prevent visual fatigue.24 The readings were then used to compute the anterior and overall Bolton's ratio using the following formulas; According to Bolton the overall ratio is calculated by the following formula:Formula
The data were analyzed by SPSS version 16.0. Kolmogrov-smirnov test was applied to see whether the sample was normally distributed or not. The test indi- cated that the data are normally distributed. Therefore parametric tests were used. To statistically compare the anterior and overall ratios among the different malocclusion groups analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied. Statistical difference was found at pless than 0.05 and 95% confident interval. For gender differences independent student t-test was performed.
The mean age was 20.752.9. Female to male ratio was 1.17:1. No statistical significant differences were present among different malocclusion groups. Table 1 shows the means standard deviations standard errors minimum maximum F-value and p-value of overall and anterior ratios observed among the different mal- occlusion groups. (P-value 0.80 and 0.122 for anterior and overall ratios respectively).
There were no significant difference among males and females. Student t-test was performed to determine sexual dimorphism. Table 2 summarizes the means standard deviations and standard errors minimum maximum F-value and p-value of overall and anterior ratios observed between male and female genders.
An ideal functional occlusion with adequate overjet and overbite requires among other factors an ade- quate size ratio between upper and lower teeth. The importance of tooth size discrepancies in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning has been the sub- ject of various discussions in orthodontic literature and accepted by orthodontic community because the
TABLE 1: ANOVA OF ANTERIOR AND OVERALL BOLTON RATIO AMONG DIFFERENT MALOCCLUSION GROUPS
Class III Mean###79.24###91.63
TABLE 2: STUDENT T-TEST OF ANTERIOR AND OVERALL BETWEEN GENDERS
###Gender###N###Mean###Std. Deviation###Std. Error###F-value###P-value
relationship between upper and lower teeth is related to orthodontic finishing excellence.1925 In this study Bolton's anterior and overall ratio in three different classes of malocclusion were studied.
In present study the statistical analysis of Bolton's anterior and overall ratio calculated in three different classes of malocclusion showed no significant differenc- es. This finding is in agreement with earlier studies done by other researchers.2627 No correlation between angle's classification of malocclusion and Bolton's discrepancy was shown by Crosby and Alexander. They studied 109 pretreatment casts of orthodontic patients of class I class II Div. 1 and class II Div. 2 malocclusion.18
Fahad et al9 analyzed sample size of 160 pretreat- ment casts of orthodontic patients and concluded that there is no statistically significant difference between these groups. Also Laino et al28 speculated after their study on different malocclusion groups that there is no evidence of any predisposition for tooth size discrepancy in any of malocclusion groups.
In conflict with the current results Batool et al29 found significantly higher mean anterior ratio for class II group than class I and class III groups. They selected cross sectional data from study casts of 15 patients reported to Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry Rawalpindi. All other ratios were within close range of Bolton's norms. Also Oeyemi et al0 collected data of 72 school children aged between 12-16 years and reported that significant difference exist between Bolton's mean tooth size ratio and of different malocclusion groups.
This study demonstrated that there was no gender difference in both anterior and overall ratio Bolton's ratio a finding which is in agreement with other stud- ies.11 Arya et al2 speculated mean size of each tooth for different groups i.e. class I and class II boys and girls in their study. Difference for individual between different arches was not analysed. Basaran et al failed to show any gender dimorphism or statistically signifi- cant difference of Bolton's tooth size discrepancy among different malocclusion groups. The study was conducted in Turkish population. The sample size consisted of 60 normal occlusion group and 00 patients divided into various malocclusion groups. Another study carried out by Ivan Ricci et al4 consisting of 105 individuals of age range 1-17 years in Brazilian population showed no significant difference between genders for both anterior and overall ratio in different classes of malocclusion.
Bernabe et al24 demonstrated sexual dimorphism which is in disagreement with the present study re- sult. Overall ratio between male and female samples was significantly different but anterior ratio between males and females was not different. Similarly a study in Nigerian population reported that overall ratio and anterior ratio were higher in females than males.29
1 Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 11-0.
2 Othman SA Harridine NWD. Tooth size discrepancies and Bolton's ratio A literature review. J Orthod 2006; : 45-51.
Profitt WR Fields HW Sanier DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th edition. Elsevier; 2012; 181-5.
4 Lombardi VA. The adaptive value of dental crowding. A con- sideration of biologic basis of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 8-42.
5 Black GV. Descriptive anatomy of human teeth. 4th edition. SS white Philadelphia 1902; 12-4.
6 Ballard ML. Asymmetry in tooth sizes a factor in etiology diagnosis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1944; 14: 67-71.
7 Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior co-efficient. Am J Orthod 1949; 5: 09-14.
8 Steadmann SR. The relationship of upper anterior teeth to lower present on plaster models of a group of acceptable occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952; 21: 91-7.
9 Fahad FH. sulaimani A Afify AR. Bolton analysis in different classes of malocclusion in Saudi Arabian sample. Egypt Dent J 2006; 52:119-25.
10 Hashim HA. Bolton tooth size ratio among different malocclusion groups a pilot study. J Pak Dent Assoc 2002; 2: 81-86.
11 Afzal A Ahmad A Vohra F Uzair M. Bolton tooth size dis- crepancies among different malocclusion groups. J Pak Dent Assoc 2005 10 (1): 670-75.
12 Nie Q Lin J. Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrep- ancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 20: 556-58.
1 Fattahi HR Pakhsir HR Heydeyati Z. Comparison of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod 2006; 28: 491-95. 14 Araujo E Souki M. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod 200; 7: 07-1.
15 Ta TA Ling JY Hang U. tooth size discrepancies among differ- ent occlusion groups of southern chines children. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001; 120: 556-58.
16 Kundi IU Bashir U Zahid S Shaheed S Usman K. Bolton tooth size analysis of Pakistanis of 1-20 years in Islamabad city. Pak Oral Dent J. 2012; 2:421-26.
17 Freeman JE Maskeroni AJ Lortan L. Frequency of Bolton tooth size discrepancies among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 24-7.
18 Crossby DR Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size dis- crepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95: 457-61.
19 Halazonetis DJ Alexander CG. The Bolton ratio studied with the use of spreadsheets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 109: 215-9.
20 Rudolph DJ Dominguez PD Ahn K Thinh T. The use of thick- ness in predicting intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 1-40.
21 Brain S Hnat WP kusnoto B Hnat TW. A new accurate approach to anterior ratio with clinical applications-part 1: a computer program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 68-72.
22 Fattahi HR Razmidideh R PoueSadeghi HR. Comparison of tooth size ratios (Bolton Analysis) among different malocclusion groups. J Dent Shiraz 200; 4 ().9-46.
2 Santno M Ayoub ME Pardi VA Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 0-7.
24 Bernabe E Major PW Flores Mir C. Tooth width ratio discrep- ancies in the sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop
2014; 125: 61-5. 25 Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth align- ment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1954; 12: 265-92.
26 Al-Tamimi T Hashim HA. Bolton tooth size ratio revisited. World J orthod 2005; 6(): 289-95.
27 Othman SA Haradine WT. Tooth size discrepancy and Bolton Ratio: a literature reviews. J Orthod 2006; (1):45-51.
28 Laino A Quraemba G Pudano S Stanzoine S. Prevalance of tooth size discrepancy among different malocclusion groups. J Orthod 200; 4: 7-44.
29 Batool I Abbas A Rizvi AA Abbas I. Evaluation of tooth size discrepancy in different malocclusion groups. J Ayub Med College Abbottabad 2008; 20 (4). 51-4.
0 Oyeyemi VO Michael I Olaranti D. Bolton tooth size discrepancy in a sample of Nigerian adolescents. J Int Dent 201; ((: 2-8.
1 Al-Omari Iyad K zaid B AlbitarM Hamdan AM. Tooth size discrepancy among Jordanian school children. Eur J Orthod 2008 0(5): 527-1.
2 Arya BS Savara BS Thomas D Clarkson Q. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 479-86.
Basaran G Selek M Hamami O Akkus Z. Intermaxillary Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 26-0.
4 Ricci ID Scavnavini MA Kaieda A Rosario HA Paranhos LR. Bolton's ratio in subjects with normal occlusion and malocclusion. Braz J Oral Sci 201; 12: (4). 57-61.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal|
|Date:||Dec 31, 2014|
|Previous Article:||HYPOPLASIA ASSESSMENT INDEX IN CLEFT LIP AND PALATE SUBJECTS.|
|Next Article:||ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION LEVEL AMONG ORTHODONTIC PATIENTS.|