Printer Friendly

BOKO HARAM Dissecting the myth.

For over a decade and a half, the militant terror group, Boko Haram, has held Nigeria in the grip of fear as it has rampaged across the north of the country indulging in an orgy of killing and kidnapping, and causing an international outcry. The latest kidnapping of schoolgirls took place in February. Yet information about the group remains sketchy and contradictory claims by the government have compounded the issue and led to often wild accusations of collaboration with officials. Another group, allied with Fulani herdsmen in the north, is also threatening a major ethnic conflict in the country. As the political temperature rises, Peter Ezeh sets out to separate fact from fiction and get to the kernel of the truth behind Boko Haram and its affiliates.

The raid on another girl's school in Nigeria's northeast in February by the violent Muslim sect, Boko Haram, was a major embarrassment for a government that had written off the insurgents as a vanquished force.

Their release (actually, 104 were returned--five died in captivity and the abductors are holding on to one hostage, who refused to renounce her Christian faith) just 30 days afterwards has thrown up a plethora of discordant views from a wide spectrum of Nigerian society.

Some see the events as real and deserving of concern, while others are suspicious that the grim events were made up so as to find an excuse to use the anti-insurgency security fund, and thus improve the rating of President Muhammadu Buhari in the run-up to the 2019 general elections, where it is speculated that he will run for a second term. Some have suggested the events were invented to give the President an excuse for offering an amnesty to the sectarian insurgents, which he proposed after the hostages were brought to see him in Abuja after their release.

Some of the views on what Boko Haram is, and their true intentions, are even more remarkable.

In the case of the new abduction of schoolgirls, the mainstream narrative was that the insurgents came in three trucks and whisked off 110 of the girls just before dusk.

It was the first such raid to take place on a girl's school in the six years since more than 200 girls were abducted in the notorious raid of 2014 that made world headlines and opened up a dangerous dimension in the activities of the sect.

The 2014 raid was in Chibok in Borno State, which shares its western boundary with Yobe State, where this February's raid happened at the Government Girls Science Technical College, in the sleepy horticultural community of Dapchi.

Chibok and Dapchi are roughly 150km from each other and both states, Borno and Yobe, were once one, until the younger state (Yobo) was sliced off from the older one in 1991.

A former cabinet minister who also once worked for the World Bank, Oby Ezekwesili, periodically leads a peaceful march to the office of the President in Abuja demanding #BringBackOurGirls. Erstwhile US First Lady, Michelle Obama, while her husband was still in office, once echoed the cry in sympathy in faraway America. More tnan half the girls taken from Chibok were yet to be recovered at the time of the Dapchi event.

Confusing claims and counter-claims

The Chibok captives were taken during the tenure of former President Goodluck Jonathan and by the larger Boko Haram group under Abubakar Shekau. The latest abduction at Dapchi was said to have been carried out by a faction of the insurgent group led by Abu Musah al-Barnawi, who was formerly under Shekau but split with him in 2016 when they disagreed on the leadership of the original Boko Haram.

An earlier communique from the Nigerian army claimed that Shekau had been killed but in an effort to disprove the claim, Boko Haram brought out a video showing someone who said he was Shekau. Sceptics said the man was Shekau's lookalike. Barnawi himself was reported to have been arrested by the Nigerian troops in December 2016, the same year he parted ways with Shekau.

It is remarkable that Barnawi's group itself has been silent on the Dapchi matter. The Nigerian government and the military did much of the talking. Opposition politicians and other sceptics have cashed in on this aspect of the events and the vague-seeming identity of this faction of the insurgents in their efforts to establish that the Dapchi incident was stage-managed by the Nigerian authorities. Boko Haram war lord, Shekau, issued public statements, including videos, at intervals after the Chibok abduction.

Amnesty International, in a widely reported statement, said that the Nigerian Army was informed in good time that the insurgents were heading for Dapchi but they did nothing to protect the girls. The army and the police have also traded blame on the matter.

The army said it removed its detachment stationed in the Dapchi area because it was needed for another assignment elsewhere. According to them, it handed the security of the area over to the police. But the police swiftly denied that the army had handed the security of the place to them before the attack.

Critics also see the same disparity between Nigerian official claims and the reality in the wider fight against Boko Haram. While government and military spokespeople had said that the group was virtually defeated, President Buhari's government was recently reported to have been permitted by governors of Nigeria's federating states to take $lbn from a special public fund set up for the fight. The money is worth N365bn. The report about the new financial prop for the anti-terror campaign came barely a week after President Buhari was quoted as having said during a visit to Kano, "Nigeria, Chad and Niger Republic have succeeded in crushing Boko Haram insurgents in the NorthEast."

The opposition, including Ayodele Fayose, the vocal PDP governor of Ekiti State, was critical of the decision to allocate a further $1bn to the Boko Haram campaign. A PDP spokesman, Kola Ologbondiyan, told a Lagos daily, "How can you justify that? Do you want to spend N365bn on an insurgency you claimed you have defeated?'

A different kind of war

In the four months around the abduction of the Dapchi girls, a total of 1,351 people were killed in all but two of Nigeria's 36 states in violence that was largely linked to sectarian militancy. In January alone, when 67 unarmed villagers were killed by Muslim herders in the central state of Benue, 676 were also massacred in various other parts of the country. The killing spree began on New Year's Day.

Communities in the northeastern districts suffered the most, providing more than half of the total casualties, but the distribution of the deaths brings in an obvious worrisome dimension and has contributed to the varied interpretations of the Boko Haram campaign.

As I prepared to file this story in early April, there were reports of two incidents in Boko Haram's founding city of Maiduguri, with some sources putting the number of dead as high as 29 at first count. Scores of others, close to 100 by one account, were wounded.

The statistics do not include cases of girls and women being kidnapped, an occurrence which is fairly rampant. They kidnap men too, as in the well-publicised example when they took lecturers from the University of Maiduguri who were on fieldwork.

This seeming focus on girls and women raises a number of questions which academics studying the violent sect still rack their brains about. Is it because they are characteristically soft targets? Is it because sect members are separated from the larger Muslim society in a manner that makes it difficult for them to find brides and so they go for what ethnographers call 'bride capture'? Is it because through the captives, the insurgents can nave the means of replenishing their numbers, through the offspring from liaisons?

In the Chibok case, from videoed accounts by Boko Haram leaders and ex-abductees who managed to escape, it was learnt that captives were married off to Muslims who support the insurgents. There are also unconfirmed reports of using some captives as suicide bombers.

Dr Samuel Onyeidu, who teaches comparative religion at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, in south-eastern Nigeria, told New African that the true intention behind the kidnappings might never be known until insider accounts become accessible. "The sort of violence that they visit on members of their own religion, not to mention members of other faiths, is un-Islamic," he explains. "There is nothing in Islam to explain their forcible taking of the innocent girls."

Caption: Left: A Nigerian soldier on patrol in Damask, north-east Nigeria. Three hundred children were kidnapped from Damask in Nov. 2014, but it received less publicity than other cases. Most are still missing. Top: Sandals strewn on the ground at the Government Girls Science Technical College in Dapchi after the abduction of 110 schoolgirls

Caption: Above: President Buhari with the returned Dapchi schoolgirls

Opposite top: Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau. Opposite bottom: Nigerien soldiers patrolling near Bosso, Niger, on Nigeria's northern border. The town has been the target of deadly Boko Haram attacks

The origins of Boko Haram The Boko Haram movement began in 2002 as a pro-Islam anti-establishment cult in Nigeria's extreme north-eastern state of Borno, which borders northern Cameroon, where some accounts trace the origins of its founder, Uztaz Mohammed Yusuf.

That precursor of the now deadly sect was known simply as Yusfiyya (or 'followers of Yusuf') or Yara Malam ('Teacher's Children'). Its less charitable critics called it the Nigerian Taliban. Boko Haram is actually the popular alias of this proup and roughly translates as Western Civilisation is Evil', or 'Western-style Education is Sin'. Its official name is Jama'atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda'awati wal-Jihad, translated as 'People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet's Teachings and Jihad'.

Boko Haram's objective is the establishment of a theocratic state run on the Muslim sharia (the legal system of Islam). Their preaching resonated with the teeming, unemployed youth in Borno State. In those early days, Ali Modu Sheriff, who later ran for governor of Borno State and won, was widely publicised as cashing in on Yusuf's cult for his electioneering something Sheriff denies.

What is beyond doubt, though, is that as Yusuf's movement grew in popularity, it also began to shift away from non-violence. The group began having a series of brushes with the police; the confrontation peaked in 2009 with a bloody insurrection in Borno State's capital of Maiduguri and neighbouring towns. Yusuf was arrested by the police and he died in their custody afterwards.

At Yusuf's death, his deputy, Abubakar Shekau, with the nom de guerre of Darul Tawheed (or 'home of monotheism') took over. The death seemed to have fuelled a more fiery approach to the agitation in a part of Nigeria that had gained the reputation of being a hotbed of Islamist activism.

Early in 1999, following the preaching of an earlier but short-lived cult led by Abubakar Lawan, some Muslim students at the University of Maiduguri had burnt their certificates and joined the Ahlusunnawal Jamah Hijra group.

Not many were surprised when Yusuf's group morphed into a fullscale well-armed insurrection in the shape of Boko Haram the same year. By 2010, Boko Haram had grown defiant enough to take on not only the police, but also the Nigerian army. Christians and Muslims and other critics were routinely killed. The group also began to attack all emblems of'Western civilisation' including hotels, universities, European-style health workers, and once, the Nigerian office of the UN in the federal capital, Abuja.

Shekau connected Boko Haram to international terror groups, pledging loyalty to Islamic State of Iraq Syria (ISIS) and linked his group to the so-called Islamic State in West Africa (ISWA).

In 2016, an internal disagreement over leadership caused a split and Boko Haram's international partners preferred to work with his rival, Barnawi. Shekau stuck to his guns, though, and rejected the leadership of his former lieutenant. Both the US and the Nigerian army have offered separate bounties on Shekau.

Curious copycat group

One curious copycat group with methods that mimic those of Boko Haram, has embedded itself with herders of the humped Bos indicus species of cattle and now roam the entire length and breadth of Nigeria. This development, with its ethnic dimensions, could be even more dangerous and spark off widespread ethnic conflict across the country.

The more familiar herders of these livestock used to be confined to only the northern parts of the country. They were simple country folk armed with nothing more than canes, following their animals about as they grazed in the green savannah, which those parts of the country boast more than any other districts in Nigeria. Lately however, men with military-grade assault rifles can be seen with them, ready to attack at any opportunity. The central and southern districts are the most targeted, for obvious reasons. These are mainly agrarian districts. In typical cases, the cattle consume crops that are growing or have been harvested.

In a method that reminds one of the Janjaweed versus farmer encounters in Sudan, the armed companions of the herders swoop on those who oppose or try to resist them and vast numbers of casualties in favour of the invading herders are always the result. They also often rape women and kidnap men to extort ransoms.

One noticeable difference with the Sudan case is the Nigerian attackers come by motorised transport, usually minibuses or motorcycles, instead of on horseback. The conflicts can only be asymmetrical because in Nigeria, it is illegal for non-military people to bear such powerful assault rifles. Since the hapless members of the farming communities respect the law, many accuse the Nigerian federalist government of being nonchalant to complaints about the ravages of the herder-gunmen.

The herders exempt no space in these central and southern areas. It is curious that known critics of the authorities are usually targeted. They are known to have invaded universities, taken a former presidential candidate--Olu Falae --captive, and to have invaded the residence of vocal Nobel literature laureate, Wole Soyinka, to give only some examples.

Professor Docknan Sheni, the Vice-Chancellor of Plateau State University in central Nigeria, called a press conference to raise the alarm. "Lectures will be going on and cattle will be roaming around up to the administrative block. This is not good for the system," he told journalists.

Some governors of states where such carnages had taken place are known to have wept publicly in their helplessness. On New Year's Day this year, the attackers swooped on the central state of Benue considered the breadbasket for some Nigerian food staples--and massacred 73 people.

Governor Samuel Ortom organised a mass burial and many commentators criticised President Buhari for not attending or promptly sending condolences. The President later denied having any ulterior motive for delaying action.

Edwin Ujege, a spokesman of the Tiv, one of the horticultural groups that have borne the brunt of the violent raids, told a committee sent by President Buhari in the wake of the New Year's massacre, that since the attacks had begun 2,000 people had been killed in Benue State alone. He described the killings as a jihad (a Muslims' holy war), adding that it was nothing short of ethnic cleansing.

Wilfred Anagbe, the Catholic bishop of the diocese of Markurdi, Benue's capital, told the committee that in reaction to previous forays, several horticultural villages had been deserted before the grisly onslaught of January.

It was David Umahi, governor of Ebonyi State, Benue's southwestern neighbour, that President Buhari named to lead the delegation to the aggrieved state. In an ironic twist, as Governor Umahi returned to his office in Abakaliki shortly afterwards, the herders had begun killing farmers in two communities there. Previously the armed group had attacked a village in tne neighbouring state of Enugu and slaughtered 50 farmers in a dawn raid. After the Benue killings, former president Olusegun Obasanjo, a known critic of the extension of cattle grazing to the south, went to the mass grave and repeated his recommendation of cattle being confined to ranches rather than having open-field grazing. On an earlier occasion Obasanjo had said, "My village is not a traditional pastoralist area ... We do not see cattle unless a big man dies [and some are required for the funeral feast]."

It has been suggested that the herders be declared a terrorist group, a situation that will be embarrassing to President Buhari because they are officially known as Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN), and before his election to his present lofty office, he (Buhari) was their godfather. Nearly all members o fMACBAN are of the Fulani ethnic group to whih President Buhari belongs. The Nigerian journalistic term for the herders is in fact "Fulani herdsmen".

Government spokesmen have said that many of the violent elements following the herders are not Nigerian. They come from other West African countries. Rather than assuage critics, this has given rise to more disquieting views, one of which links tne operations of the gunmen to the Boko Haram group. No documented evidence supporting such a link is known to the public as yet.

Possible solutions

Some critics of the violence point to the fact that both Boko Haram and the violent pro-herder fighters are Muslims with prosharia ideology. One analysis is that, given the composition of the pro-herder fighters, they are most likely the occupation arm' of the ISWA, which uses the apparently innocuous pastoralism to gain a foothold in all parts of Nigeria.

This suspicion has grown after suggestions that would have put an end to killings were made but were not accepted by the herders, lhe Governor of Kano State offered to accommodate as many herders, with their animals, as were interested in coming to the vast land mass he controls.

A governor in the south-west Eroposed using trains to take chilled eef from the North to consumers in the South, reducing any needs to take cattle to market in the South.

After the Nigerian military claimed that it had dislodged Boko Haram from the large uninhabited bush known as the Sambisa Forest on the Nigerian-Cameroonian northern border, it was suggested that the herders take their animals to that place. The most talked-about idea is the proposal that the herders should change from open-field grazing to sedentary ranching. Neither the herders nor the central Nigerian government seem eager to accept any of those proposals. Instead, the government is intent on establishing what it has named cattle colonies in each of the country's 774 local government areas. However, many governors of Nigeria's states refuse to provide land for cattle colonies, which in their ideal form would provide the Fulani herders with the land to feed their livestock.

Lately, some commentators have accused President Buhari's federal institutions of being in sympathy with the violent Islamic groups. President Buhari has denied any collaboration between the military and the violent Muslim groups or the killer herders. The President cautioned against inflammatory statements capable of drawing down anarchy of the type that was witnessed in Somalia.

Government spokesmen have advised commentators to stop making unsubstantiated statements and instead, think of solutions to the security problems. When the former teenage captives from Dapchi were taken to him at Abuja, President Buhari said he was ready to grant amnesty to and rehabilitate Boko Haram members if they laid down their arms. He was silent on the pro-herder fighters, though.

Perhaps the way forward is to heed the call of an NGO, the International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law, for the UN to investigate the alleged complicity by some of the Nigerian federal institutions in the onslaught on unarmed civilian populations. The group is led by Emeka Umeagbalasi, who is described as a criminologist and an expert in security studies. The group said that the UN has such powers under Chapter VII of its Charter. There is the need, it said, "to unravel the remote and immediate causes and perpetrators of the killings" and those who profit from them.

Until then, the menace of Boko Haram and the killer herders will continue to dominate Nigerian thoughts and continue to unhinge an already fraught ethnic balance in the country.

Caption: Boko Haram. Their methods have been mimicked by the armed fighters now accompanying Fulani herdsmen as they move through Nigeria with their cattle
COPYRIGHT 2018 IC Publications Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:IN DEPTH
Author:Ezeh, Peter
Publication:New African
Geographic Code:6NIGR
Date:May 1, 2018
Words:3397
Previous Article:Looking a gift horse in the mouth--once again: Some African countries continue to baffle by once again failing to look beyond narrow self-interest...
Next Article:SDGS can propel Africa beyond dependency on aid: The President of the Republic of Ghana and Co-Chair of the UN Secretary General's Eminent Group of...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |