Printer Friendly

BIOCONTROL OF BOTRYTIS CINEREA ON STRAWBERRY FRUIT BY PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING BACTERIA.

Byline: M. F. Donmez, A. Esitken, H. Yildiz and S. Ercisli

ABSTRACT

In the present study, a total of 186 bacterial strains isolated from various soil sources and plant species from Eastern Anatolia region in Turkey were evaluated for their ability to suppress gray mold (Botrytis cinerea Pers. ex Fr.) occurred on strawberry cv. Fern. Among 186 bacterial strains, 36 were found effective to inhibit of development B. cinerea under in vitro conditions, and thirteen of them which have greater inhibition zone were selected as biocontrol agent. These antagonistic strains were identified as Bacillus lentimorbus, B. megaterium, B. pumilis, B. subtilis, Enterobacter intermedius, Kurthia sibirica, Paenibacillus polymyxa and Pantoea agglomerans. The inhibition zones among bacteria against B. cinerea were found between 0.50 (Bacillus C6, Brevibacterium MFD-47 and Pantoea MFD-232) and 3.75 cm (Enterobacter MFD-81) in vitro.

The strawberry fruits were inoculated with B. cinerea in laboratory trials and Bacillus MFDU-2 (14.41 mm) was found more effective to prevent mycelial development on strawberry fruits in comparison to the control (19.20 mm). In terms of conidia germination on strawberry fruits, the lowest disease incidence was observed in MFD-45 treatment (20.8%), while disease incidence rate for the control was 79.2%. It was shown that antagonistic bacterial strains inhibited B. cinerea and that they have a potential use in sustainable strawberry production.

Keywords: Gray mold, Fragaria x ananassa, antagonism, postharvest, biocontrol.

INTRODUCTION

The disease can cause important fruit losses on strawberry plants before or after harvest worldwide and it is estimated that they can cause yield losses up to 25% for untreated strawberries (Williamson et al. 2007; Zhang et al. 2007). Gray mold is also a major cause of postharvest losses of strawberry fruits during storage, transportation or shipment. In strawberry, the fungus can attack flowers, fruits and leaves as well (Sutton and Peng 1993). Infection may occur in the flower, remain quiescent until fruits mature, and then develop abundantly, causing fruit decay accompanied by profuse sporulation of the pathogen (Kovach et al., 2000). Therefore B. cinerea infections are largely limited postharvest life of strawberry fruits. Control of B. cinerea on strawberries can be achieved with the frequent application of fungicide; however, resistance of the pathogen to common fungicides is well known.

The fungicide application may also cause to remain toxic residues on the fruits (Rabolle et al. 2006; Myresiotis et al. 2007). Moreover, commercially available fungicides can reduce pollination and cause misshapen fruits due to time of application (Kovach et al., 2000).

Therefore the difficulty in controlling B. cinerea has led to researchers to find alternative methods, which include biological control (De Waard et al. 1993; Smilanick 1994; Sutton 1995). Biological control is an alternative to reduce Botrytis infections and has been shown to be successful in many other crops (Redmond et al. 1987; Saligkarias et al. 2002). This method was also applied succesfully in strawberries against Botrytis (Sutton 1995; Lima et al. 1997) and the effectiviness of several biological control agents against gray mold in strawberries are reported (Peng and Sutton 1991; Swadling and Jeffries 1996; Lima et al. 1997; Guinebretiere et al. 2000; Essghaier et al. 2009). In these studies the biological control agents have been used on strawberry flowers and leaves. However there are few studies regarding biological control on strawberry fruits against B. cinerea.

Therefore, in the present study, selected PGPB antagonists were evaluated for effectiveness in suppressing growth of B. cinerea in strawberry fruit under laboratory conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source and maintenance of antagonistic bacteria and pathogenic fungus: A total of 186 Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) strains including genera Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Agrobacterium, Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Brevibacillus, Brevibacterium, Brevundomonas, Enterobacter, Hydrogenophaga, Kurthia, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas, Erwinia, Pantoea, Rhodococcus, Variovorax, Microbacterium and Flavobacterium found at Department of Plant Protection of Ataturk University were used as antagonistic bacteria. These bacteria were isolated from soil and various plant species (walnut, bean, grape and strawberry) from Eastern Anatolia Region in Turkey.

Bacteria were grown on Nutrient Agar (NA, Difco) for routine use, and maintained in Nutrient Broth (NB, Difco) with 15% glycerol at _80oC (Nuaire, USA) for long-term storage. B. cinerea isolate has been supplied by Department of Plant Protection, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey. This treatments x 3 replicates x 6 fruits = 252 fruits in total) and experiment was repeated three times.

Detection of inhibition of conidial germination on strawberry fruit: The thirteen cultures (Table 1) that inhibited mycelial growth in vitro were screened for inhibition of conidial germination on freshly harvested strawberry fruit that had been artificially inoculated with B. cinerea. Strawberry fruits were harvested from field, sorted and transported to the laboratory. Fruits were isolate was cultivated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, dipped in a suspension of 104 B. cinerea conidia mL [?]1, Difco) medium.

Detection of antagonistic activity in vitro assay: The 186 PGPB strains were used for pre-evaluation against an isolate of B. cinerea in- vitro plate assay. PDA plates were inoculated by a streak of the antagonistic bacterial strains. A disc (7 mm in diameter) of the fungi was punched out with a sterilized corkborer from advancing zones of the fresh culture, and placed on either side of bacteria inoculated plates. The petri plates were incubated at 25+-2degC for 5 days. The diameters of hyaline inhibition zones were measured and experiment was repeated three times. After pre-evaluation, 36 strains formed various levels of inhibition zone against B. cinerea (Table 1).

Detection of inhibition of mycelia growth on strawberry fruit: The study was conducted at the Ataturk University, Department of Horticulture and Plant Protection in Turkey in 2007 and 2008. Day-neutral strawberry cv. 'Fern' was used as material. Among pre- selected 36 PGPB strains, 13 strains which formed higher inhibition zone against B. cinerea were used as antagonists in this experiment (Table 1). Green strawberry fruits were sampled from cv. Fern in the field conditions. A disc (7 mm in diameter) of fungi was punched out with a sterilized corkborer from advancing zone of the fresh culture, was placed on strawberry fruits. A disc without fungi was used as a negative control. Negative and positive control fruits were sprayed with sterile distillated water.

After inoculation of pathogenic fungi, antagonistic bacteria were sprayed on inoculated fruits. These bacterial strains were grown on nutrient agar.

A single colony was transferred to 500 ml flasks containing NB, and grown aerobically in flasks on a rotating shaker (150 rpm, Gerhard, Germany) for 48 h at 27oC. The bacterial suspension was then diluted in sterile distilled water to a final concentration of 1x109 CFU/ml, and the resulting suspensions were used to treat strawberry fruit. Inoculated fruits were incubated in damp chambers in a climatic cabinet (25degC and dark). Four days after inoculation of fungi and bacteria, the diameter of mycelial growth on fruit were measured and mycelial growth area was calculated. The experiment was conducted as completely randomized design with three replicates per treatment, 6 fruits in each replicate (14 allowed to dry for 1 h and inoculated with 1 h bacterial suspensions (1x109 CFU/ml). Control fruits dipped in conidia, dried and dipped in nutrient broth diluted 1:1 with sterile distilled water, were placed in damp chambers in a climatic cabinet.

Fruits were incubated for 4 days at 25degC, before being scored for percent of fungal infection, by examining each fruit for visual signs of infection. The experiment was conducted as completely randomized design with three replicates per treatment, 8 fruits in each replicate (14 treatments x 3 replicates x 8 fruits = 336 fruits in total) and experiment was repeated three times.

Data analysis: Data were evaluated by analysis of variance, and means were separated by Duncan's multiple range tests (Duzgunes et al. 1993).

RESULTS

In vitro experiments: In vitro experiments showed that 36 of 186 PGPB strains, including species Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Brevibacterium, Brevibacillus, Brevundomonas, Enterobacter, Erwinia, Kurthia, Pantoea, Paenibacillus and Pseudomonas inhibited B. cinerea growth in various levels (Table 1), producing inhibition zones on PDA plates. Of these, 7 bacterial strains produced an inhibition zone greater than 3.00 cm in diameter, 11 produced inhibition zones between 2.00 and 3.00 cm in diameter and 18 formed an inhibition zone less than 1.00 cm in diameter. 5 days later from incubation, the biggest hyaline inhibition zone was found in Enterobacter MFD- 81 (3.75 cm), followed by Bacillus T33 (3.30 cm). The other 155 PGPB strains did not inhibit the growth of B.cinerea on PDA medium.

Effects of PGPB on mycelial growth on strawberry fruits: The data of mycelial growth on strawberry fruits are summarized in Table 2. The bacterial treatments significantly reduced mycelial growth compared to positive control (P less than 0.001). The results also showed that the highest (20.02+-1.47 mm) and lowest (14.41+-0.83 mm) diameter of mycelial on fruit was observed in CD-8 and MFDU-2, respectively. Similarly to mycelia diameter, mycelium area on fruits of CD-8 (317.1+-18.44 mm2) and MFDU-2 (166.6+-16.54 mm2) was the highest and the lowest. In the case of bacterial strains, MFDU-2, CD-9, T33, T26, MFD-4, MFD-1, MFD-45, MFD-113 and MFD-18 significantly decreased mycelial growth on fruits compared with the control. The other bacterial strains were found to be ineffective.

Effects of PGPB on conidia germination on strawberry fruits: Bacterial isolates, which inhibited B. cinerea growth in-vitro, were also tested for their ability to reduce grey mold on strawberry fruits inoculated with B. cinerea conidia (Figure 1). Significant reduction of gray mold rot on fruits was observed with the CD-9, MFD-1, MFD-20, MFD-45, MFD-81, MFD-113, MFDU-2, T26 and T33 compared to control (P less than 0.001).

However, there were no significant differences between CD-8, MFD-4, MFD-18, MFDU-1 and control (Figure 1). The results showed that the highest percentage of gray mold infection (79.2%) was observed in the control and the lowest (20.8%) was in MFD-45, followed by MFD- 81 (25.0%) and T26 (37.5%), with no statistically differences between MFD-45 and MFD-81. MFD-45 and MFD-81 reduced the amount of gray mold rot on fruits by 73.7 and 68.4% compared with the control, respectively. Percent of gray mold rot MFDU-2, MFD- 113, CD-9, T33, MFD-20 and MFD-1 treatments were 41.5, 41.7, 50.0, 50.0, 54.2 and 58.3%, respectively.

Table 1. Effect of PGPB on Botrytis cinerea mycelia development in in vitro conditions.

PGPB###Inhibition zone(cm)###PGPB###Inhibition zone(cm)

Bacillus subtilis C6###0.50###Bacillus subtilis MFD-4###2.65

Brevundomonas vesicularis C18###2.10###Bacillus cereus Gc subgroup A MFD-9###0.95

Bacillus cereus Gc subgroup A C22###2.10###Kurthia sibirica MFD-18###2.25

Bacillus megaterium GC subgroup A CD-3###1.00###Bacillus megaterium GC subgroup A MFD-19###2.10

Bacillus megaterium GC subgroup B CD-8###2.40###Bacillus subtilis MFD-20###3.25

Paenibacillus polymyxa CD-9###2.50###Bacillus atrophaeus MFD-22###2.10

Bacillus thurungiensis kurstaki E1###0.95###Enterobacter intermedius MFD-45###2.15

Bacillus subtilis E2###1.00###Brevibacterium luteum MFD-47###0.50

Bacillus cereus Gc subgroup B E3###1.00###Enterobacter intermedius MFD-81###3.75

Bacillus cereus Gc subgroup B E4###0,90###Pantoea agglomerans MFD-113###3.15

Bacillus atrophaeus E6###1.95###Pantoea agglomerans MFD-232###0.50

Acinetobacter calcoaceticus E15###0.90###Brevibacterium casei MFD-408###0.75

Bacillus thurungiensis kurstaki E17###0.75###Brevibacterium casei MFD-419###1.00

Enterobacter agglomerans GC subgroup

III F3-88###1.05###Brevibacterium casei MFD-455###0.70

Brevibacillus centrosporus FD-2###0.75###Bacillus subtilis MFD-U1###3.20

Erwinia crysanthemi biotype III FF4###1.00###Bacillus subtilis MFD-U2###3.00

Bacillus lentimorbus MFD-1###3.20###P. fluorescens biotype G T26###2.95

Bacillus megatorium GC subgroup A MFD-2###2.00###Bacillus pumilis T33###3.30###

Table 2. Effect of some bacterial strains on mycelia development on strawberry fruit.

Treatments###Mycelia diameter (mm)###Mvcelia area (mm2)

Negative Control###0###0

Positive Control###19.20+1.53 ab###292,9+3 1.65 abc

Bacillus CD-8###20.02+1.47 a###317.1+18.44 a

Paenibacillus CD-9###14.68+-0.71 fg###173.1+-18.34 g

Bacillus MFD-1###15.89+-0.95 defg###201.7+-9.36 efg

Bacillus MFD-4###15.63+-0.58 defg###203.5+-36.94 efg

Kurthia MFD-18###17.01+-0.72 cde###228.8+-21.67 de

Bacillus MFD-20###18.62+1.20 abc###273.0+35.12 bc

Enterobacter MFD-45###16.42+-1.02 defg###219.9+-26.57 def

Enterobacter MFD-81###17.75+1.98 bed###260.9+27.87 cd

Pantoea MFD:113###16.68+-1.10 cdef###221.0+-20.72 def

Bacillus MFDU-1###19.15+2.28 ab###291.3+17.99 abc

Bacillus MFDU-2###14.41+-0.83 g###166.6+-16.54 g

Pseudomonas T26###15.11+-1.18 efg###182.2+-11.02 fg

Bacillus T33###14.87+-1.12 efg###174.4+-13.88 g

DISCUSSION

The present study showed that gray mold rot can be effectively controlled by PGPB due to its antagonistic capability to inhibit spore germination and penetration of the fungus, B. cinerea, on strawberry fruits. Previous studies also confirmed that these bacteria had a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity against several plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria species in vitro and in vivo (Esitken et al. 2002; Altindag et al. 2006). Kloepper et al. (2004) studied several strains of Bacillus spp and they found elicit induced resistance in 11 different host plants and caused reductions in a spectrum of diseases (foliar, stem and soil-borne fungal diseases). Nevertheless, it seems that there were no direct correlation between inhibition zone diameter determined in vitro and biocontrol effects on fruit. For example, MFD 45 had the smaller inhibition zone among selected bacteria however it was found one of the most effective bacteria on mycelium development and conidia germination.

For controlling fungal plant pathogens, a variety of mechanism has been considered (Kim and Kim 1994). Cherif et al. (1992) suggested that cell-wall-degrading enzymes such as b - 1, 3 - glucanases, cellulases, proteases and chitinases are involved in the antagonistic activity of some biological control agents against phytopathogenic fungi. Essghaier et al. (2009) indicated that suppression of B. cinerea growth in vitro by the selected moderately halophilic isolates and formation of inhibition zones were presumably due to the metabolites being released from bacteria into the culture medium. Antagonists that compete with saprophytic growth of Botrytis spp. may reduce pathogen growth and/or sporulation in crop debris (KOhl et al. 1995; Morandi et al. 2003), resulting in the reduction of disease progress rate.

Using these antagonists is advantageous because of the continuity of the interaction between pathogen and antagonist in the crop debris (Fokkema 1993). Suppressing either colonization or sporulation of B. cinerea is a valid strategy to biologically control the pathogen in strawberry and other hosts (Sutton and Peng 1993; KOhl and Fokkema 1998; Morandi et al. 2003). In strawberry production, young leaves can be infected by B. cinerea, therefore, the high levels of suppression of pathogen sporulation in leaves will effectively reduce inoculum produced in crop debris and consequently contribute to reduce disease incidence on both flowers and fruits (Mertely et al. 2002; Legard et al. 2005).

Among PGPB agents, P. polymyxa was found to be the most effective in suppressing germ tube growth of B. cinerea in a strawberry fruit pulp suspension culture (Pichard et al. 1995; Helbig 2001). They found that the bacteria have antibiotic and enzyme production which is vital for biocontroling of disease. The involvement of substances, enzymes or antibiotics, seems to play a role in the active principle of the present isolate as symptoms of lysis were observed at germ tubes of conidia of B. cinerea.

But, we cannot say that the antagonistic behavior of bacteria was a result of such activity because we did not make antibiotic and enzyme production tests of bacteria. However, our isolation and assay techniques selected based on a bacterium's ability to grow on fungal mycelium wall material and the fact that these bacteria are able to grow on fungal cell walls infers that antibiotic activity was probably not solely responsible for the antagonism we observed.

On the other hand, there is a new strategy being investigated is increasing competition for nutrients on leaf surfaces by enhancing saprophytic fungal, bacterial and/or yeast populations. This approach shows promise for controlling grey mould, Botrytis cinerea, on grapes, tomato and potted plants (Farber et al. 2006), but is limited to pathogens that require nutrients to grow and infect the plant.

Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank to TUBITAK for their financial support for this study through project, TOVAG 106O049.

REFERENCES

Altindag, M., M. Sahin, A. Esitken, S. Ercisli, M. Guleryuz, M. F. Donmez, and F. Sahin (2006). Biological control of brown rot (Moniliana laxa Ehr.) on apricot (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Hacihaliloglu) by Bacillus, Burkholdria, and Pseudomonas application under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Biological Control 38: 369-372.

Cherif, M., N. Benhamou, and R. R. Belanger (1992). Occurrence of cellulose and chitin in the hyphal cell walls of Pythium ultimum: a comparative study with other plant pathogenic fungi. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 39: 213-222.

DeWaard, M.A., S. G. Georgopoulos, D. W. Hollomon, H. Ishii, P. Leroux, N. N. Ragsdale, and F. J.Schwinn (1993). Chemical control for plant diseases: problems and prospects. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31: 403-421.

Duzgunes, O., T. Kesici, and F. Gurbuz (1993). Istatistik Metodlari. Ankara Universitesi Yayinlari, Ankara.

Esitken, A., H. Karlidag, S. Ercisli, and F. Sahin (2002). Effects of foliar application of Bacillus subtilis Osu-142 on the yield, growth and control of shot-hole disease (Coryneum blight) of apricot. Gartenbauwissenschaft 67: 139-142.

Essghaier, B., M. L. Fardeau, J. L. Cayol, M. R. Hajlaoui, A. Boudabous, H. Jijakli, and N. Sadfi-Zouaoui (2009). Biological control of grey mould in strawberry fruits by halophilic bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology 106: 833-846.

Farber, S., R. Costanza, D. L. Childers, J. Erickson, K. Gross, M. Grove, C. S. Hopkinson, J. Kahn, S. Pincetl, A. Troy, P. Warren, and M. Wilson (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Biosi., 56: 121-133.

Fokkema, N. J. (1993). Opportunities and problems of control of foliar pathogens with micro- organisms. Pesticide Sci., 37: 411-416. Guinebretiere, M.H., C. Nguyen, N. Morrison, M. Reich, and P. Nicot (2000). Isolation and characterization of antagonists for the biocontrol of the postharvest wound pathogen Botrytis cinerea on strawberry fruits. J. Food Protection,63: 386-394.

Helbig, J. (2001). Biological control of Botrytis cinerea Pers. Ex Fr. in strawberry by Paenibacillu s polymyxa (Isolate 18191). J. Phytopathology 149: 265-273.

Kim, Y. S., and S. D. Kim, S.D. (1994). Antifungal mechanism and properties of antibiotic substance produced by Bacillus subtilis YB-70 as a biological control agent. J. Microbiol. Biotech. 4: 296-304.

Kloepper, J.W., C. M. Ryu, and S. A. Zhang (2004). Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology94: 1259-1266.

Kovach, J., R. Petzoldt, and G. E. Harman (2000). Use of honey bees and bumble bees to disseminate Trichoderma harzianum 1295 - 22 to strawberries for botrytis control. Biological Control 18: 235-242.

KOhl, J., W. M. L. Molhoek, C. H. van der Plas, and N. J. Fokkema (1995). Effect of Ulocladium atrum and other antagonists on sporulation of Botrytis cinerea on dead lily leaves exposed to field conditions. Phytopathology 85: 393-401.

KOhl, J., and N. J. Fokkema (1998). Strategies for biological control of necrotrophic fungal foliar pathogens. In: Boland, G.J., Kuykendall, L.D. (eds). Plant-Microbe Interactions and Biological Control. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, p.49-87.

Legard, D.E., S. J. MacKenzie, J. C. Mertely, C. K. Chandler, and N. A. Peres (2005). Development of a reduced use fungicide program for control of Botrytis fruit rot on annual winter strawberry. Plant Disease 89: 1353-1358.

Lima, G., A. Ippolito, F. Nigro, and M. Salerno (1997). Effectiveness of Aureobasidium pullulans and Candida oleophila against postharvest strawberry rots. Postharvest Biology and Technology 10: 169-178.

Mertely, J.C., S. J. MacKenzie, and D. E. Legard (2002).Timing of fungicide applications for Botrytis cinerea based on development stage of strawberry flowers and fruit. Plant Disease 86: 1019-1024.

Morandi, M.A.B., L. A. Maffia, E. S. G. Mizubuti, A. C. Alfenas, and J. G. Barbosa (2003). Suppression of Botrytis cinerea sporulation by Clonostachys rosea on rose debris: a valuable component in Botrytis blight management in commercial greenhouses. Biological Control 26: 311-317.

Myresiotis, C.K., G. S. Karaoglanidis, and K. Tzavella- Monari (2007). Resistance of Botrytis cinerea isolates from vegetable crops to anilinopyrimidine, phenylpyrrole, hydroxyanilide, benzimidazole, and dicarboximide fungicides. Plant Disease 91:407-413.

Peng, G., and J. C. Sutton (1991). Evaluation of microorganisms for biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea in strawberry. Canadian J. Plant Pathology 13, 247-257.

Pichard, J.-P., D. Larue, and J. L. Thouvenot (1995). Gavaserin and saltavalin, new peptide antibiotics produced by Bacillus polymyxa. FEMS Microbiology Letters 133: 215-218.

Rabolle M., N. H. Spliid, K. Kristensen, and P. Kudsk (2006). Determination of fungicide residues in field-grown strawberries following different fungicide strategies against gray mold (Botrytis cinerea). J. Agric. Food Chem. 54: 900-908.

Redmond, J.C., J. J. Marois, and J. D. MacDonald (1987). Biological control of Botrytis cinerea on roses with epiphytic microorganisms. Plant Disease 71: 799-802.

Saligkarias, I.D., F. T. Gravanis, and H. A. S. Eptona (2002). Biological control of Botrytis cinerea on tomato plants by the use of epiphytic yeasts Candida guilliermondii strains 101 and US 7 and Candida oleophila strain I-182: II. a study on mode of action. Biological Control 25: 151-161.

Smilanick, J.L. (1994). Strategies for the isolation and testing of biocontrol agents. In: Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases, Theory and Practice, eds. C. L. Wilson, and M. E. Wisniewski, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Sutton, J.C., and G. Peng (1993). Biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea in strawberry leaves. Phytopathology 83: 615-621.

Sutton, J.C. (1995). Evaluation of micro-organisms for biocontrol: Botrytis cinerea and strawberry, a case study. In: Advances in Plant Pathology, eds. J. H. Andrews, and I. C. Tommerup, Academic Press, San Diego, USA.

Swadling, I.R., and P. Jeffries (1996). Isolation of Microbial Antagonists for Biocontrol of Grey Mould Disease of Strawberries. Biocontrol Science and Technology 6: 125-136.

Williamson, B., B. Tudzynski, P. Tudzynski, and J. A. L. van Kan (2007). Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease. Molecular Plant Pathology8: 561-580.

Zhang, H., L. Wang, Y. Dong, S. Jiang, J. Cao, and R.Meng (2007). Postharvest biological control of gray mold decay of strawberry with Rhodotorula glutinis. Biological Control 40: 287-292.
COPYRIGHT 2011 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Donmez, M.F.; Esitken, A.; Yildiz, H.; Ercisli, S.
Publication:Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9PAKI
Date:Dec 31, 2011
Words:3744
Previous Article:RESPONSE OF FOUR ZUCCHINI (Cucurbita pepo L.) HYBRIDS TO DIFFERENT ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI.
Next Article:EFFECT OF ESSENTIAL ORANGE (CITRUS SINENSIS L.) OIL ON RUMEN MICROBIAL FERMENTATION USING IN VITRO GAS PRODUCTION TECHNIQUE.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters