Printer Friendly

Association between inbreeding coefficient and susceptibility to HIV-1 infection, a case-control study.

Introduction

It is suggested that consanguineous marriage, the marriage between relatives, has been a longstanding social habit among populations. (1) Prevalence of consanguinity depends on several factors, including demographic, religious, cultural and socio-economic factors. (1,2)

This type of marriage has received a great deal of attention as a potential risk factor for many adverse health outcomes. (2) It has been reported that in populations where consanguineous marriages are common, inbred individuals are more common among infected cases for tuberculosis and hepatitis. (3) Consanguineous unions are common in many Asian and African countries. (2)

For countries where the consanguineous marriage is common, (4-12) the association between consanguinity and susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) is highly important.

To the best of our knowledge, there is no study concerning the association between susceptibility to HIV-1 and parental consanguineous marriages. Therefore, the present case-control study was carried out.

Methods

Participants

Data were collected from 333 HIV-1-infected individuals (48 females, 285 males) referred to a local health center in Shiraz (Fars province, southern Iran). A total of 999 healthy individuals (144 females, 855 males) frequency matched with the cases according to their sex and age were also studied, as a control group.

Collected data covered socio-demographic characteristics such as, history of incarceration, injection drug abuse, risky sexual behaviors, blood transfusion, HIV-1 infection status of the mother and consanguinity marriages of parents. All participants provided informed consent. This research was approved by the institutional review board of the Shiraz University.

Coefficient of inbreeding

The coefficient of inbreeding (F) is the probability that an individual has received both alleles of a pair from an identical ancestral source, or the proportion of loci at which he is homozygous.

Consanguineous marriages were classified by the degree of relatedness between parents: first cousins (F= 1/16), first cousins once removed (F=1/32), second cousins (F=1/64), and beyond second cousins (F<1/64). The coefficient of inbreeding (F) for offspring of first cousins, first cousins once removed, second cousins, and beyond second cousins was 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, and <1/64, respectively. The mean inbreeding coefficient (alpha) was calculated for the sample. Considering the low prevalence of first cousin once removed, second cousin, and beyond second cousin marriages among parents of the patients, we classified parental marriages into three categories as follows: first cousin marriages, other related marriages, and unrelated marriages.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) (version 11.5). A probability of p <0.05 considered statistically significant difference.

Results

Overall the proportion of parental consanguineous marriages was 23.7 and 32.8 percent among patient and control groups, respectively (Table 1). There was a significant difference between cases and controls for the type of marriages among parents of patient and control groups ([Chi.sup.2]=9.880, df=1, p=0.007). The equivalent mean inbreeding coefficient (alpha) was 0.0110 and 0.0156 among patient and control groups, respectively.

As shown in Table 1, the first cousin marriages were the commonest type of all matings in parents of patients (15.6%) and controls (22.3%). This type of marriage has significantly decreased the risk of infection with HIV-1 in the offspring (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.86, p=0.005). Other types of consanguinity were 8.1 and 10.5 percent among parents of HIV-1infected patients and controls, respectively, indicating that although the risk of infection decreased, the observed alteration is not statistically significant (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.43-1.06, p=0.090).

In this study, the inbreeding coefficient was higher in the HIV-negative control group, the present data suggesting that the risk of HIV-1 infection decreased as a function of inbreeding coefficient ([Chi.sup.2]=7.531, p=0.006).

It should be noted that there was no significant difference between types of marriages and selected risk factor for HIV-1 infection such as: history of incarceration ([Chi.sup.2]=3.269, df=2, p=0.195), injection drug abuse ([Chi.sup.2]=2.464, df=2, p=0.292), risky sexual behaviors ([Chi.sup.2]=0.001, df=2, p=0.999), blood transfusion ([Chi.sup.2]=0.089, df=2, p=0.956) and child of infected mother ([Chi.sup.2]=1.90, df=2, p=0.387).

Discussion

Several studies indicate that parental consanguinity is correlated with an increased risk of infection in the offspring. (3) Based on the data released by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2013, the prevalence of HIV infection in Iran was estimated at 129 per 100,000 people. Therefore the present finding indicating a negative association between the susceptibility of infection with HIV-1 and inbreeding coefficient is an unexpected association.

It is shown that some individuals remain uninfected by HIV-1 despite repeated exposure to the virus. A molecular basis for such HIV-1 resistance has been reported. (13)-16 Variants of the CCR-5 (MIM: 601373) gene may be responsible for relative or absolute resistance to HIV-1 infection. A 32 base pair deletion (delta32), resulting in a defective CCR-5 protein, was identified as reducing the risk of HIV-1 infection in the homozygous state and offering partial resistance to infection in the heterozygote genotype. (13-16) Therefore, the resistance against HIV-1 infection may increase as a function of number of the delta (32) alleles.

The global distribution of the delta (32) allele among various human populations is widely variable. (17-19) The delta (32) allele is more prevalent in European and European-derived populations (about 10-20 percent) but almost absent or extremely rare among African and East Asian ethnic origins. Based on a previously published study, this allele has a prevalence of about 2.5 percent in the Iranian healthy population. (19)

If parents were not related to each other, based on the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the prevalence of homozygote for the delta (32) allele of CCR-5 is equal to [q.sup.2]. However, in consanguineous marriages, the prevalence of this genotype becomes equal to [q.sup.2] + Fpq. Where p and q are frequencies of wild type and the variant alleles, and F is the inbreeding coefficient. Assuming q=0.025 and F=0.0625, the homozygote for the delta (32) allele (resistant against HIV-1 infection) increased about 3.43-fold in offspring of consanguineous marriages compared with unrelated marriages. Therefore theoretically, individuals who are resistant against infection with HIV-1 increased among offspring of consanguineous marriages compared with offspring of unrelated marriages. This point supports our present finding.

It is well established that there are several other genes (such as SDF-1, SCYA5, K1R3, etc) involved in susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. (20-22) Considering that variants of these loci associated with resistance to HIV-infection have a relatively low prevalence in the population (about 0.020.20), the frequency of individuals who are resistant to HIV-infection is increased among the offspring of consanguineous marriages compared with unrelated marriages. Taken together, the observed association between parental consanguinity and a lower risk for HIV-1 infection might be interpreted.

It should be noted that other studies on different ethnic groups are necessary to evaluate the generalization of the present results and our suggestion on risk of infection with HIV-1.

Acknowledgments: The authors are indebted to the participants for their close cooperation. The authors are indebted to Dr. Ali Reza Hassan Abadi, Dr. Hassan Joolaei, Mrs. Mahnaz Nozarian (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) for their contribution for sampling. The authors are indebted to Dr. Maryam Ansari-Lari for critical reading of the manuscript and for her contribution in discussion.

Conflicts of interest: All authors--none to declare.

Author contributions: MR: data collection and writing; MS: idea, statistical analysis and writing.

Funding: This study was supported by the Shiraz University.

References

(1.) Saadat M. Consanguineous marriages in Iranian folktales. Community Genet. 2007;10:38-40. [CrossRef] [PubMedl

(2.) Bittles AH. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 2001;60:89-98. [CrossRef] [PubMedl

(3.) Lyons EJ, Frodsham AJ, Zhang L, Hill AV, Amos W. Consanguinity and susceptibility to infectious diseases in humans. Biol Lett. 2009;5:574-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [FullText]

(4.) Khoury SA, Massad D. Consanguineous marriage in Jordan. Am J Med Genet. 1992;43:769-75. [CrossRef] [PubMedl

(5.) Rajab A, Patton MA. A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Ann Hum Biol. 2000;27:321-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(6.) Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud DD. Consanguineous marriage in Iran. Ann Hum Biol. 2004;31:263-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(7.) Othman H, Saadat M. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. J Biosoc Sci. 2009;41:685-92 [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(8.) Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reprod Health. 2009;6:17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [FullText]

(9.) Rafiee L, Saadat M. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages among Iranian Georgians. J Biosoc Sci 2011; 43:47-50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(10.) Saify K, Saadat M. Consanguineous marriages in Afghanistan. J Biosoc Sci. 2012;44:73-81. [CrossRef] [PubMedl

(11.) Islam MM. Effects of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behaviour, adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring mortality in Oman. Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40: 243-55. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(12.) El-Kheshen G, Saadat M. Prevalence of consanguineous marriages among shi'a populations of Lebanon. J Biosoc Sci. 2013;45:675-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(13.) Dean M, Carrington M, Winkler C, et al. Genetic restriction of HIV-1 infection and progression to AIDS by a deletion allele of the CKR5 structural gene. Hemophilia Growth and Development Study, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, Multicenter

Hemophilia Cohort Study, San Francisco City Cohort, ALIVE Study. Science. 1996;273:1856-62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(14.) Huang Y, Paxton WA, Wolinsky SM, et al. The role of a mutant CCR5 allele in HIV-1 transmission and disease progression. Nat Med 1996;2:1240-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(15.) Liu R, Paxton WA, Choe S, et al. Homozygous defect in HIV-1 coreceptor accounts for resistance of some multiply-exposed individuals to HIV-1 infection. Cell. 1996;86:367-77. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(16.) Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, et al. Resistance to HIV1 infection in Caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature. 1996; 382:722-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(17.) Martinson JJ, Chapman NH, Rees DC, Liu YT, Clegg JB. Global distribution of the CCR5 gene 32-basepair deletion. Nature Genet. 1997;16:100-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(18.) Zimmerman PA, Buckler-White A, Alkhatib G, et al. Inherited resistance to HIV-1 conferred by an inactivating mutation in CC chemokine receptor 5: studies in populations with contrasting clinical phenotypes, defined racial background, and quantified risk. Mol Med. 1997;3:23-36. [PubMed] [FullText]

(19.) Voevodin A, Samilchuk E, Dashti S. A survey for 32 nucleotide deletion in the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene (deltaccr-5) conferring resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in different ethnic groups and in chimpanzees. J Med Virol. 1998;55:14751. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(20.) Gonzalez E, Dhanda R, Bamshad M, et al. Global survey of genetic variation in CCR5, RANTES, and MIP 1alpha: impact on the epidemiology of the HIV-1 pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:5199-204. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [FullText]

(21.) Ioannidis JP, Rosenberg PS, Goedert JJ, et al. Effects of CCR5-Delta32, CCR2-64I, and SDF-1 3'A alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: An international meta-analysis of individual-patient data. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:782-95. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

(22.) Boulet S, Sharafi S, Simic N, et al. Increased proportion of KIR3DS1 homozygotes in HIV-exposed uninfected individuals. AIDS. 2008;22:595-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

doi: 10.11599/germs.2013.1046

Mehrdad Rajaei [1], Mostafa Saadat [2] *

Received: 27 September 2013; revised: 25 November 2013; accepted: 30 November 2013

[1] MSc, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71454; Institute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran; [2] PhD, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71454; Institute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

* Corresponding author: Mostafa Saadat, PhD, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Char-rah Adabiyate Shiraz 71454; Institute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

saadat@shirazu.ac.ir; msaadat41@yahoo.com

Article downloaded from www.germs.ro

Published December 2013
Table 1. Association between parental marriages and risk of HIV-1
infection in offspring

  Type of       Controls N (%)   Cases        OR     95%     p-value
  marriages                      N (%)               CI

Unrelated         671 (67.2)     254 (76.2)   1.0     --       --
First Cousins     223 (22.3)     52 (15.6)    0.61   0.44-    0.005
                                                     0.86
Others            105 (10.5)      24 (7.2)    0.67   0.43-    0.090
                                                     1.06
COPYRIGHT 2013 Asociatia pentru Cresterea Vizibilitatii Cercetarii Stiintifice (ACVCS)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original article
Author:Rajaei, Mehrdad; Saadat, Mostafa
Publication:GERMS
Article Type:Report
Date:Dec 1, 2013
Words:2058
Previous Article:Antibiotic prophylaxis in retrograde ureteroscopy: what strategy should we adopt?
Next Article:Treatment of periodontal disease with dental curing light--could it be that simple?
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters