Printer Friendly

Assessment of the mutagenic, antimutagenic and cytotoxic activities of ethanolic extract of araticum (Annona crassiflora Mart. 1841) by micronucleus test in mice/Avaliacao das atividades mutagenica, antimutagenica e citotoxica do extrato etanolico de araticum (Annona crassiflora Mart.) pelo teste de micronucleos em camundongos.

1. Introduction

Since ancient times, plants have always been used as a common source of medicines for their prophylactic effects and for the treatment of illnesses and diseases. The Brazilian flora has been estimated to be the largest in the world, the country being home to about 120 thousand species, of which only 1% have been studied for their phytochemical and pharmacological properties (Rizzo et al., 1996). It is often considered to be the most promising habitat for the search of medicinal plants, due to high biodiversity (Stepp, 2004). In conformity with this expectation, some plants have demonstrated interesting properties, such as Phaseolus vulgaris L., 1753 (Ribeiro and Salvatori, 2003), Croton cajucara Benth., 1854 (Serpeloni et al., 2004), Stryphnodendron adstringens (Mart.) Coville, 1910. (Andrade et al., 2004), that were able to reduce the incidence of DNA damage. However, others, such as Cochlospermum regium (Schrank) Pilg., 1924. (Castro et al., 2004), Ocotea duckei Vatt. (Marques et al., 2003), Paullinia cupana Kunth, 1821. (Fonseca et al., 1994), showed to be genotoxic and/or mutagenic, what suggest their use must be well established.

Even among the antimutagens, carefulness should also be taken. Many substances reported as antimutagens or anticarcinogens have been shown to be mutagenic or carcinogenic themselves (Zeiger, 2003). Plants are known to contain innumerable biologically active compounds and while they may have pharmacological properties, they may also cause damage, including damage to DNA (Alade and Irobi, 1993; Marques et al., 2003). In this way, the investigation of traditionally used medicinal plants is thus valuable on two levels: firstly, as a source of potential chemotherapeutic drugs, and secondly, as a measure of safety for the continued use of medicinal plants (Verschaeve et al., 2004).

Annona crassiflora Mart., 1841, popularly known as "Araticum", is a member of the Annonaceae family found in the central Cerrados of Brazil. The traditional use of this plant includes the treatment of wounds, venereal diseases, snakebites, louses and as anti-microbial, anti-diarrheal and anti-rheumatic (Almeida et al., 1987; Correia, 1926; Cruz, 1979). Cyathostemma Griff.,1854, Fissistigma oldhamii (Hemsl.) Merr., 1919, Annona cherimola Mill., 1768 and Annona senegalensis Pers., 1806, are annonaceous traditionally used ethnomedically against cancer (Graham et al., 2000).

A number of Annonaceae species of the genus Annona have been shown to contain polyketides with significant cytotoxic, antitumour, pesticidal, antimicrobial and antiparasitic activities (Rupprecht et al., 1990). The ethanolic extract of A. crassiflora seeds exhibited in vitro significant cytotoxicity to human lung carcinoma (A-549) and melanoma (RPMI 7951) cells. From this extract, an acetogenin (ACG--acetogenin) named araticulin was isolated (Santos et al., 1996). The biological effects of many annonaceous have been related to the ability of ACGs to inhibit the NADH: ubiquinone oxiredutase (complex 1) of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Gonzalez et al., 1998). This class of molecules has been suggested to be a group of potential anti-neoplastic agents (Alali et al., 1999; Yuan et al., 2003; Tormo et al., 1999). However, cytotoxicity could be associated with genotoxicity, as observed in many antitumoral substances of natural or synthetic origin. The presence of genotoxic action in antitumoral compounds does not benefit the organism in the long term (Ramos et al., 1998).

Due to the wide biological activities presented by this plant as well as the widespread use in folk medicine by Brazilian people, at the present study we have evaluated the mutagenic, antimutagenic and cytotoxic activities of Araticum's ethanolic extract by mouse bone marrow micronuclues test (Heddle, 1973).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Healthy, young male adults (8-12 weeks) Mus musculus (Swiss Webster) out bred mice, weighing 25-30 g, obtained from Central Animal House of Universidade Federal de Goias, were used in the experiment. All animals were brought to the laboratory five days before the experiments. They were housed in plastic cages (40 x 30 x 16 cm) at 24 [+ or -] 2 [degrees]C and 55 [+ or -] 10% of humidity, with a light-dark natural cycle of 12 hours. Food (appropriate commercial ration- Labina, Ecibra Ltda) and water were given ad libitum.

2.2. Plant material

Leaves of A. crassiflora were collected in Parauna, a town in the State of Goias, Brazil, and identified by Professor Heleno Dias Ferreira (Departamento de Botanica, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal de Goias). Air-dried and powdered leaves were exhaustively extracted with 95% aqueous ethanol at room temperature for three days. Alcohol solution was filtered and then concentrated under reduced pressure at 40 [degrees]C for dryness. The crude ethanolic extract was transferred to glass flasks filled to the top and kept at 5 [degrees]C until the moment of use. The powder of ethanolic extract of araticum (EEA--ethanolic extract of araticum) used

in the experiment was dissolved in 25% ethanol-water solution.

2.3. Chemical and drugs

The chemical and drugs used in the experiment were the following: mitomycin C (MMC--mitomycin C) ([C.sub.15][H.sub.18][N.sub.4][O.sub.5], Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lot No. 217ACB), Dibasic sodium phosphate ([Na.sub.2][HPO.sub.4[12H.sub.2]O, Merck, Lot No. 127H0168), Monobasic sodium phosphate ([NaH.sub.2][PO.sub.4[H.sub.2]O, Merck, Lot No. 47H1445), Giemsa (Doles, Lot No. 1081), Methanol ([CH.sub.4]O, Synth, Lot No. 39107), Fetal Calf Serum (Laborclin, Lot No. 30721063).

2.4. Determination of LD [(lethal dose).sub.50]

Ten-animal groups were treated intraperitonealy (i.p) with 100, 150, 250, 300, 400 and 500 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of EEA. The negative control (distilled water) and solvent-control (distilled water- 25% of ethanol P.A.) groups were also included. The number of survivors in each treatment was observed in times of 5, 15, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours. At the end of this period, the number of survivors was counted and plotted in a graph, which the abscissa axis corresponds to the administered doses and the ordinate axis represents the survival percentage. The [LD.sub.50] (dose which inactivates 50% of individuals) was estimated by the graphic and the obtained value was 200 mg.[kg.sup.-1].

2.5. Experimental procedure (micronucleus test)

Mutagenicity evaluation: The doses of EEA were chosen according to the determination of [LD.sub.50]. Five-animal groups were treated i.p. with 10 mg.[kg.sup.-1] (5% of [LD.sub.50]), 20 mg.[kg.sup.-1] (10% of [LD.sub.50]), 50 mg.[kg.sup.-1] (25% of [LD.sub.50]), 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] (50% of [LD.sub.50]) and 160 mg.[kg.sup.-1] (80% of [LD.sub.50]) of EEA for three different periods of treatment :24, 48 and 72 hour and euthanized (as recommended by MacGregor et al., (1987)). The positive control group (MMC = 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1], the maximum tolerated dose--MTD (maximum tolerated dose)--which corresponds to 80% of [LD.sub.50], (Salamone et al., 1980), negative control group and solvent-control group were also included.

Antimutagenicity evaluation: Five-animal groups were co-treated i.p. with 10, 20, 50 and 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of EEA and 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of MMC and sacrificed after 36 hours of treatment. The positive (MMC = 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1]), negative and solvent-control groups were also included.

For both experiments, after the periods of treatment, femurs were exposed and sectioned opened and the bone marrow was gently flushed out using fetal calf serum. After centrifugation (300 xg, 5 minutes) the bone marrow cells were smeared on glass slides, coded for blind analysis, air-dried and fixed in absolute methanol for 5 minutes. The smears were stained with Giemsa for detecting micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE--micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes) (Schimid, 1975). For each animal, three slides were prepared and 1000 polycromatic erythrocytes (PCE--polychromatic erythrocytes) were counted to determine the frequency of MNPCE. To determine the cytotoxicity of this plant, 1000 normocro matic erythrocytes (NCE--normochromatic erythrocytes) were counted, as well as the frequency of polycromatic erythrocytes within the same microscope fields. Then, the PCE/NCE ratio was calculated. The slides were analyzed in Olympus BH-2 microcopy (10 x 100).

2.6. Statistical analysis

In order to analyze the mutagenic activity of the EEA, the MNPCE frequency from the treated groups was compared to the results obtained from the solvent-control group by Student's t-test, with p value lower than 0.05 (p < 0.05) considered as indicative of significance.

To analyze the antimutagenic activity of this extract, the frequency of the MNPCE from the treated groups was compared to the results obtained from the positive control group by t-test. p-values lower than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered as indicative of significance.

To evaluate the cytotoxicity of the extract, PCE/NCE ratio of all treated groups was compared to the result obtained from the solvent-control in the mutagenic effect evaluation, and compared to the results obtained from the positive control in antimutagenic effect evaluation. A non-parametric test, the Sign Test was applied to determine the statistical significance of the results (Triola, 2005). The significance level considered was p < 0.01.

3. Results

MNPCE frequencies and the PCE/NCE ratios at 24, 48 and 72 hours in different doses of the EEA are shown (Table 1).

For all tested doses (Table 1) (10, 20, 50, 100 and 160 mg.[kg.sup.-1]) in different times of evaluation (24, 48 and 72 hours) and negative control group, the results did not present a significant increase of MNPCE frequency compared to the solvent-control group ([sup.a] P > 0.05). There was significant increase of MNPCE frequency at the positive control group compared to the solvent control group ([sup.b] P < 0.05). This result was in conformity to the expected value.

At 10 and 20 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of the extract, there was no significant difference of PCE/NCE ratio compared to the solvent control group ((c) P > 0.01) at all times evaluation. At doses of 50 and 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1], it was demonstrated a significant reduction of PCE/NCE relationship compared to the solvent control group at 24 and 48 hours ([sup.d] P < 0.01). So, in these cases, cytotoxicity was verified. At 72 hours, the PCE/NCE ratio was not statistically significant compared to solvent-control group ([sup.c] P > 0.01). At 160 mg.[kg.sup.-1], the relationship (PCE/NCE) was significantly lower than solvent control group in all treated times ([sup.d] P < 0.01).

In the antimutagenicity experiment, the obtained results of MNPCE frequency and PCE/NCE ratio from bone marrow by simultaneous treatment (EEA + 4.0 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of MMC) in different doses are shown (Table 2).

At 10 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of the extract and 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of MMC, the average for MNPCE/1000 PCE was 17.4. This result did not differ significantly from the positive control group ([sup.e] P > 0.05). At 20, 50 and 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of extract co-administered with 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of MMC, the averages for MNPCE were 9.6, 8.6 and 2.2, respectively. For all doses the results showed a significant reduction of MNPCE frequencies compared to the positive control group ([sup.f] P < 0.05). The negative and solvent control groups were all statistically different compared to positive control group ([sup.f] P < 0.05), in agreement with the expected results.

To evaluate the cytotoxicity of this extract in the simultaneous treatment, the PCE/NCE ratio was again calculated. At 10, 20 and 50 mg.[kg.sup.-1] and 4.0 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of MMC, the results did not show any significant difference of PCE/NCE ratio compared to positive control group ([sup.g] P > 0.01). At 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of extract and 4.0 mg.[kg.sup.-1] MMC, a significant reduction of PCE/NCE ratio in relation to positive control ([sup.h] P < 0.01) was observed. Both negative and solvent-control groups were statistically different compared to positive control group ([sup.h] P < 0.01), which presented a lower value, in concordance with the expected result.

4. Discussion

The aim of this work was to evaluate the mutagenic, cytotoxic and antimutagenic activities of ethanolic extract of araticum (A. crassiflora) by mouse micronucleus test. This is a short term assay which has been widely employed to detect the mutagenic (clastogenic and/or aneugenic) and cytotoxic effects of substances in vivo.

Micronuclei (MN) separated from and in addition to the main nucleus of a cell are the results of acentric fragments or lagging chromosomes that fail to incorporate into either of the daughter nuclei during telophase of the mitotic cells. The frequency of MN in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) of mouse bone marrow is a very sensitive index of damage produced by ionizing radiation and by chemical mutagens (Rabello-Gay, 1991; MacGregor et al., 1987). This test presents some advantages compared to others kinds of assays, in which we may mainly mention the low cost and the reliability. In addition, this assay utilizes mammalians, which present capacity of metabolization similar to humans that hardly can be reproduced in totality in "in vitro" assays (Rabello-Gay et al., 1991). The intraperitoneal via (i.p.) was applied because this procedure maximizes the exposure of the bone marrow to chemical mutagens (Preston et al., 1981).

The results of mutagenic evaluation of EEA by bone marrow micronucleus test did not present a significant increase of MNPCE frequency compared to the solvent--control group for all tested doses in three different periods of time (24, 48 and 72 hours) (Table 1). These results indicated that EEA did not exhibit the mutagenic (clastogenic and/or aneugenic) effects in PCE of the bone marrow of mice.

The micronuclei test used in this study also detects cytotoxic effects by the PCE/NCE relationship. When normal proliferation of the bone marrow cells is affected by a toxic agent, the number of immature erythrocytes (PCE) is prejudiced in relation to mature erythrocytes (NCE). Thus, the PCE/NCE ratio may decrease (RabelloGay, 1991). Our results indicated that (Table 1), in low doses (10 and 20 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of EEA) it was not observed a significant reduction of PCE/NCE relationship at any sampling time. However, in the higher doses (50 and 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] at 24 and 48 hours and 160 mg.[kg.sup.-1] at 24, 48 and 72 hours) it was observed a strong cytotoxic effect, although the genotoxicity remained the same as for the solvent-control.

As the obtained results at the mutagenic assay did not exhibit a significant difference among the three different times of treatment, thus, one time of treatment was tested for antimutagenicity assay in order to reduce the number of animals in the experiment. The established time was 36 hours because at this time the positive control (MMC) presents major mutagenic action (Salamone et al., 1980).

The obtained results of the EEA co-treated with 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] of MMC are exhibited in table 2. Our results show that at the lowest dose (10 mg.[kg.sup.-1] EEA + 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] MMC), the EEA did not modulate the mutagenic effect of MMC. However, the antimutagenic effect was strongly observed for all others doses tested (20, 50 e 100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] EEA + 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] MMC), diminishing, in this manner, the mutagenic activity of the alkylating agent (MMC). The cytotoxic effect in the simultaneous treatment was also evaluated. These results showed that the co-treatment, at lower doses (10, 20 and 50 mg.[kg.sup.-1] EEA + 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] MMC) did not differ from the cytotoxic action of MMC itself. Meanwhile, in the highest dose, the co-treatment (100 mg.[kg.sup.-1] EEA + 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] MMC) caused an augmentation of cytotoxic action in relation to positive control. By these results, we can observe that, at the intermediate doses (20 and 50 mg.[kg.sup.-1] EEA + 4 mg.[kg.sup.-1] MMC) of the EEA, it was exhibited an effective antimutagenic action in spite of the same magnitude of cytotoxicity in relation to MMC.

Our results were basically in concordance with earlier studies realized by various researchers on some Annona's constituents properties. A number of Annonaceae species of genus Annona have been shown to contain polyketides or ACGs with significant cytotoxic, antitumour, pesticidal, antimicrobial and antiparasitic activities (Rupprecht et al., 1990). More than 300 natural ACGs have been isolated and fully characterized from either bark, leaves and seeds of different Annonaceae species (Duret et al., 1999).

A. crassiflora Mart. extracts have previously been shown to have cytotoxicity to human lung carcinoma (A-549) and melanoma (RPMI 7951) cells (Santos et al., 1996). This activity has been associated to the ability of the ACG to inhibit ATP synthesis in the cell (Duret et al., 1999). A recent report demonstrated that ACG was able to arrest T24 bladder transitional carcinoma cells at the G1 phase and cause apoptotic cell death in a Bax- and caspase-3- related pathway (Yuan et al., 2003). According to Chiu et al. (2003), decreased intracellular cAMP and cGMP levels may also play important roles in the ACG-induced apoptosis pathway.

One common way of cytotoxicity is by free radical generation, which can lead to mutagenic effects (Bjelland and Seeberg, 2003). Probably, this mechanism may not be the unique way of action of the EEA, since no relevant DNA damage was detected. ACGs have very potent and diverse biological effects including cytotoxic, antitumor, antimalarial, pesticidal and antifeedant activities (Takada et al., 2000). We suggest that this cytotoxic activity presented by EEA could be mediated at least partly by the ACG, which could affect the ATP levels and/or induce apoptosis of the bone marrow dividing cells. However, the complexity of plant extracts cannot be overlooked, as the final response is likely to be the result of synergistic, antagonistic and other interactive effects among their biologically active components.

Another class of chemical constituents of this plant are the flavonoids, which have important effects on cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Santos and Salantino (2000) studied foliar flavonoids of Annonaceae and reported the presence of kaempferol and quercetin (flavonols) in A. crassiflora. A great number of scientists reported that some flavonoids have antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic activities against a number of genotoxic agents (Santos and Salantino, 2000; Galati and O'Brien, 2004). Undeger et al. (2004) reported that quercetin was able to reduce significantly the DNA strand breakage induced by MMC in human lymphocytes. In addition, kaempferol and quercetin were able to inhibit hemolysis, lipid peroxidation and superoxide radical generation, exerting a potent antioxidant activity (Ng et al., 2003). Although how quercetin and other flavonoids protect against DNA damage and potentially against carcinogenesis is largely unknown, it is suggested that flavonoids may act as antioxidant, free radical scavengers, inhibitors of tumor cell growth, inducers of apoptosis, modulators of DNA repair or carcinogen inactivators (Lee et al., 2003; Duthie and Dobson, 1999).

The EEA exhibited in this study, antimutagenic effects. Probably, the antimutagenic activity detected in our experiment might be mediated at least partly by the action of flavonoids. Since many active chemicals possess a biphasic nature (with antimutagenic and mutagenic effects) (Zeiger, 2003) for this extract, the mutagenic action was not presented.

In summary, ours results indicate that the ethanolic extract of araticum (EEA) did not exhibit mutagenic effect in mice. The cytotoxicity was evidenced specially for higher doses. The antimutagenic effect of this plant towards MMC was strongly demonstrated. Possibly, the antimutagenic activity exhibited might contribute to an anticarcinogenic effect and the cytotoxicity to an antitumoral activity. However, further studies are required to better characterize the antimutagenic activity of A. crassiflora Mart. extract and to identify their active compounds and mode of action.

Acknowledgments--This study was supported with grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil) and Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa de Goias. The authors thank to Professor Heleno Dias Ferreira, from the Departamento de Biologia Geral da UFG, who identified the plant material.

Received February 9, 2006--Accepted May 16, 2006--Distributed February 29, 2008

References

ALADE, PI. and IROBI, ON., 1993. Antimicrobial activities of crude extracts of Acalypha wilkesinana. J. of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 39, no. 3, p. 171-174.

ALALI, FQ., LIU, XX. and McLAUGHLIN, JL., 1999. Annonaceous acetogenins: recent progress. J. Nat. Prod., vol. 62, no. 3, p. 504-540.

ALMEIDA, SP., SILVA, JA. and RIBEIRO, JF., 1987. Aproveitamento Alimentar de especies nativas dos cerrados: araticum, baru, cagaita e jatoba, EMBRAPA-CPAC, Planaltina, first ed., 83 p.

ANDRADE, LS., SENA, JS., COSTA, PM. and CHEN-CHEN, L., 2004. Efeito antimutagenico do extrato de Stryphnodendron adstringens Mart. (barbatimao) em camundongos. Anais do 50[degrees] Congresso Brasileiro de Genetica, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

BJELLAND, S. and SEEBERG, E., 2003. Mutagenicity, toxicity and repair of DNA base damage induced by oxidation, Mutat. Res., vol. 531, no. 1-2, p. 37-80.

CASTRO, DB., SANTOS, DB., FERREIRA, HD., SANTOS, SC. and CHEN-CHEN, L., 2004, Atividades mutagenica e citotoxica de Cochlospermum regium Mart. (algodaozinho-docampo) em camundongos. Rev. Bras. Pl. Med., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 15-19.

CHIU, HF., CHIH, TT., HSIAN, YM., TSENG, CH., WU, MJ. and WU, YC., 2003. Bullatacin, a potent antitumor Annonaceous acetogenin, induces apoptosis through a reduction of intracellular pathway cAMP and cGMP levels in human hepatoma 2.2.15 cells, Biochem. Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 319-327.

CORREIA, MP., 1926. Dicionario das plantas uteis e especies exoticas, Ministerio da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, vol I, 747 p.

CRUZ, GL., 1979. Dicionario das plantas uteis do Brasil, Ed. Civilizacao Brasileira S.A, Rio de Janeiro, 599 p.

DURET, P., HOCQUEMILLER, R., GANTIER, J.C. and FIGADEERE, B., 1999. Semisynthesis and Cytotoxicity of Amino Acetogenins and Derivativesy, Bioorg. Med. Chem., vol. 7, no. 9, p. 1821-1826.

DUTHIE, SJ. and DOBSON, VL., 1999. Dietary flavonoids protect human colonocyte DNA from oxidative attack in vitro. Eur. J. Nutr., vol. 38, no. 1, p. 28-34.

FONSECA, CAS., LEAL, J., COSTA, SS. and LEITAO, AC., 1994. Genotoxic and mutagenic effects of guarana (Paullinia cupana) in prokaryotic organisms. Mutat. Res., vol. 321, no. 3, p. 165-173.

GALATI, G. and O'BRIEN, PJ., 2004. Potential toxicity of flavonoids and other dietary phenolics: significance for their chemopreventive and anticancer properties. Free Radical Biol. Med., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 287-303.

GONZALEZ, MC., LAVAUD, C., GALLARDO, T., ZAFRAPOLLO, MC. and CORTES, D., 1998. New Method for the determination of the absolute Stereochemistry in Antitumoral Annonaceous Acetogenins. Tetrahedron, vol. 54, no. 22, p. 6079-6088.

GRAHAM, JG., QUINN, ML., FABRICANT, DS. and FARNSWORTH, NR., 2000. Plants used against cancer--an extension of the work of Jonathan Hartwell. J. of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 73, no. 3, p. 347-377.

HEDDLE, JA., 1973. A rapid in vivo test for chromosomal damage, Mutat. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, p. 187-190.

LEE, JC., KIM, J., PARK, JK., CHUNG, GH. and JANG, YS., 2003. The antioxidant, rather than prooxidant, activities of quercetin on normal cells: quercetin protects mouse thymocytes from glucose oxidase-mediated apoptosis. Experim. Cell Research, vol. 291, no. 2, p. 386-397.

MacGREGOR, JT., HEDDLE, J.A., HITE, M., MARGOLIN, BH., RAMEL, C., SALAMONE, MF., TICE, RR. and WILD, D., 1987. Guidelines for the conduct of micronucleus assay in mammalian bone marrow erythrocytes. Mutat. Res., vol. 189, no. 2, p. 103-112.

MARQUES, RCP., MEDEIROS, SRB., DIAS, CS., BARBOSAFILHO, JM. and AGNEZ-LIMA, LF., 2003. Evaluation of the mutagenic potential of yangambin and of the hydroalcoholic extract of Ocotea duckei by the Ames test. Mutat. Res., vol. 536, no. 1-2, p. 117-120.

NG, TB., LIU, F., LU, Y., CHENG, CHK. and WANG, Z., 2003. Antioxidant activity of compounds from the medicinal herb Aster tataricus. Comparative Biochem. Phys. Part C 136 no. 2, p. 109-115.

PRESTON, RJ., BENDER, MA., BREWEN, JG., CARRANO, AV., HEDDLE, JA., MACFEE, AF., WOLFF, S. and WASSON, JS., 1981. Mammalian in vivo and in vitro cytogenetic assays. A report of the U.S. EPA's Gene Tox Program. Mutat Res., vol. 87 no. 2, p. 143-188.

RABELLO-GAY, MN., 1991. Teste do Micronucleo em Medula Ossea. In: Mutagenese, teratogenese e carcinogenese: metodos e criterios de avaliacao, Ed. SBG, Ribeirao Preto, 246 p.

RAMOS, A., EDREIRA, A., VIZOSO, A., BETANCOURT, J., LOPEZ, M. and DE'CALO, M., 1998. Genotoxicity of an extract of Calendula officinalis L.. J. of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 61, no. 1, p. 49-55.

RIBEIRO, LR. and SALVATORI, DMF., 2003. Dietary components may prevent mutation-related diseases in humans. Mutat. Res., vol. 544, no. 2-3, p. 195-201.

RIZZO, JA., FONSECA, AS., VALVA, FD., COELHO, ASG., SILVA, MJ. and VIANA, MVL., 1996. Ecogenetica de Harconiaspeciosa Gomez. I- Padrao espacial de distribuicao espacial de H. speciosa var gardneri e var pubescens. Anais do XLVII Congresso Nacional de Botanica, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

RUPPRECHT, JK., HUI, YH., MCLAUGHLIN, JL., 1990. Acetogenins from Annonaceae. J. Nat. Prod., vol. 53, no. 2, p. 237.

SALAMONE, MF., HEDDLE, JA., STUART, E. and KATZ, M., 1980. Towards an improved micronucleus test: Studies on 3 models agents: mitomycin C, cyclophosphamide and dimethylbenzanthracene. Mutat. Res., vol. 74, no. 5, p. 347-356.

SANTOS, DYAC. and SALANTINO, MLF., 2000. Foliar flavonoids of Annonaceae from Brazil: taxonomic significance. Phytochemistry, vol. 55, no. 6, p. 567-573. SANTOS, PL., BOAVENTURA, MAD., SUN, NJ., CASSADY, MJ. and OLIVEIRA, AB., 1996. Araticunlin, a bis-tetrahydrofuran polyketide from Annona crassiflora Mart.. Phytochemistry, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 705-707. SCHIMID, W., 1975. The micronucleus test. Mutat. Res., vol. 31, no. 1, p. 9-15.

SERPELONI, JM., DALIO, RJD., SANTOS, FV., BERNARDI, CC., MESQUITA, SFP., MACIEL, MAM., PINTO, AC., FARIA, MJSS. and COLUS, IMS., 2004. Efeitos antimutagenicos e ausencia de mutagenicidade do extrato metanolico de Croton cajucara em celulas somaticas de camundongos submetidos a tratamento subcronico. Anais do 50[degrees] Congresso Brasileiro de Genetica, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

STEPP, JR., 2004. The role of weeds as sources of pharmaceuticals. J. of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 92, no. 2-3, p. 163-166.

TAKADA, M., KUWABARA, K., NAKATO, H., TANAKA, A., IWAMURA, H. and MIYOSHI, H., 2000. Definition of crucial structural factors of acetogenins, potent inhibitors of mitochondrial complex I. BBA, vol. 1460, no. 2-3, p. 302-310.

TORMO, JR., GALLARDO, T., ARAGON, R., CORTES, D. and ESTORNELL, E., 1999. Specific interactions of monotetrahydrofuranic annonaceous acetogenins as inhibitors of mitochondrial Complex I. Chem. Biol. Interact., vol. 122, no. 3, p. 171-183.

TRIOLA, MF., 2005. Estatistica Nao-Parametrica. In Introducao a Estatistica, ed. LTC, Rio de Janeiro, 682 p.

UNDEGER, U., AYDYN, S., BASARAN, AA. and BASARAN, NS., 2004. The modulating effects of quercetin and rutin on the mitomycin C induced DNA damage. Toxicol. Lett., vol. 151, no. 1, p. 143-149.

VERSCHAEVE, L., KESTENS, V., TAYLOR, JLS., ELGORASHI, EE., MAES, A., VAN PUYVELDE, L., de KIMPE, N. and VAN STADEN, J., 2004. Investigation of the antimutagenic effects of selected South African medicinal plant extracts. Toxicol. in Vitro, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 29-35.

YUAN, SSF., CHANG, HL, CHEN, HW., YEH, YT., KAO, YH., LIN, KH., WU, YC. and SU, JH., 2003. Annonacin, a mono-tetrahydrofuran acetogenin, arrests cancer cells at the G1 phase and causes cytotoxicity in a Bax- and caspase-3-related pathway. Life Sci., vol. 72, no. 25, p. 2853-2861.

ZEIGER, E., 2003. Illusions of safety: antimutagens can be mutagens, and anticarcinogens can be carcinogens. Mutat. Res., vol. 543, no. 3, p. 191-194.

Vilar, JB. (a), Ferreira, FL. (a), Ferri, PH. (b), Guillo, LA. (c) and Chen Chen, L. (a)(*)

(a) Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Campus--II, Universidade Federal de Goias--UFG, CEP 74001-970, CP 131, Goiania, GO, Brazil

(b) Laboratorio de Bioatividade Molecular, Instituto de Quimica, Universidade Federal de Goias--UFG

(c) Departamento de Ciencias Fisiologicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biologicas, Campus II, Universidade Federal de Goias--UFG, CEP 74001-970 Goiania, GO, Brazil

* e-mail: chenlee@icb.ufg.br
Table 1. MNPCE frequencies and PCEINCE ratios after treatment with the
ethanolic extract of A. crassiftora Mart (araticum) in five animals at
different doses and times.

(%)             Dose of EEA          Time      Individual data
[DL.sub.(50)]   ([mg.kg.sup.-1])     (hours)   MN/1000 PCE

5               10                   24        3- 4- 2- 2- 2
                                     48        2- 2- 2- 3- 1
                                     72        2- 1- 1- 2- 2
10              20                   24        2- 2- 3- 3- 2
                                     48        2- 2- 1- 3- 2
                                     72        2- 3- 2- 2- 1
25              50                   24        5- 5- 3- 4- 2
                                     48        3- 2- 2- 1- 1
                                     72        4- 3- 1- 2- 2
50              100                  24        2- 1- 3- 4- 2
                                     48        4- 1- 2- 1- 2
                                     72        3- 2- 3- 2- 1
80              160                  24        3- 3- 2- 3- 1
                                     48        3- 1- 3- 1- 2
                                     72        2- 2- 2- 1- 1
-               Water *              48        1- 2- 2- 1- 3
-               Solvent-Control **   48        2 -1- 3- 4- 2
-               MMC ***              36        13-18-24-25-19

(%)
[DL.sub.(50)]   [bar.x] [+ or -] s       PCEINCE

5                2.6 [+ or -] 0.89 (a)    0.87 (c)
                 2.0 [+ or -] 0.71 (a)    0.93 (c)
                 1.6 [+ or -] 0.55 (a)    0.88 (c)
10               2.4 [+ or -] 0.55 (a)    0.97 (c)
                 2.0 [+ or -] 0.71 (a)    0.89 (c)
                 2.0 [+ or -] 0.71 (a)    0.98 (c)
25               3.8 [+ or -] 1.30 (a)    0.61 (d)
                 1.8 [+ or -] 0.84 (a)    0.48 (d)
                 2.4 [+ or -] 1.14 (a)    1.09 (c)
50               2.4 [+ or -] 1.14 (a)    0.46 (d)
                 2.0 [+ or -] 1.22 (a)    0.47 (d)
                 2.2 [+ or -] 0.84 (a)    1.07 (c)
80               2.4 [+ or -] 0.89 (a)    0.49 (d)
                 2.0 [+ or -] 1.00 (a)    0.45 (d)
                 1.6 [+ or -] 0.55 (a)    0.46 (d)
-                1.8 [+ or -] 0.84 (a)    0.97 (c)
-                2.4 [+ or -] 1.14        1.06
-               19.8 [+ or -] 4.87 (b)    0.32 (d)

(a) P > 0.05; (b) P < 0.05; (c) P > 0.01; (d) P < 0.01. All the
results were compared to the solvent-control group. * Negative
control: distilled water; ** Solvent-control: distilled water--25%
of ethanol P.A; *** Positive control: 4 mg.kg-1 of MMC.

Table 2. Frequency of MNPCE and the PCE/NCE ratio after simultaneous
treatment with MMC and ethanolic extract of A. crassiflora Mart
(Araticum) in five animals at different doses.

                Dose
(%)             ([mg.kg.sup.-1])     Time      Individual Data
[LD.sub.(50)]   (EEA + MMC)          (hours)   MN/1000 PCE

5               10 + 4.0             36        14-15-17-19-22
10              20 + 4.0             36        7-8-10-11-12
25              50 + 4.0             36        6-8-9-9-11
50              100 + 4.0            36        1-1-2-3-4
-               Water *              36        1-2-2-2-3
-               Solvent Control **   36        1-2-3-3-4
-               MMC ***              36        13-18-19-24-25

(%)
[LD.sub.(50)]   [bar.x] [+ or -] s       PCE/NCE

5               17.4 [+ or -] 3.20 (e)    0.33 (g)
10               9.6 [+ or -] 2.07 (f)    0.48 (g)
25               8.6 [+ or -] 1.82 (f)    0.26 (g)
50               2.2 [+ or -] 1.30 (f)    0.13 (h)
-                2.0 [+ or -] 0.71 (f)    0.98 (h)
-                2.6 [+ or -] 1.14 (f)    0.96 (h)
-               19.8 [+ or -] 4.87        0.32

(e) P > 0.05; (f) P < 0.05; (g)P > 0.01; (h) P < 0.01. All the results
were compared to the positive control group. * Negative control:
distilled water; ** Solvent-control: distilled water--25% of ethanol
P.A; ** Positive control: 4 [mg.kg.sup.-1] of MMC.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Vilar, J.B.; Ferreira, F.L.; Ferri, P.H.; Guillo, L.A.; Chen Chen, L.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:Feb 1, 2008
Words:5156
Previous Article:Species-environment relationship in the herb-subshrub layer of a moist Savanna site, Federal District, Brazil/Variaveis ambientais e a distribuicao...
Next Article:BTCI enhances guanylin-induced natriuresis and promotes renal glomerular and tubular effects/BTCI aumenta a natirurese induzida por guanilina e...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters