Printer Friendly

Asian carp in the diet of river otters in Illinois.

INTRODUCTION

North American river otters (Lontra canadensis-, hereafter, otters) are opportunistic aquatic predators that primarily consume fish, followed by crayfish and then amphibians (Lagler and Ostenson, 1942; Greer, 1955; Knudsen and Hale, 1968; Swimley et al., 1998: Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Crait and BenDavid. 2006; Barding and Lacki, 2012). Fish are consumed in the greatest proportion during winter (Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Crait and Ben-David, 2006; Crimmins et al., 2009; Barding and Lacki, 2012). Fish families typically identified in the scat and gut contents of otters include centrarchids, cyprinids, and catostomids (Lagler and Ostenson, 1942; Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Crait and Ben-David, 2006; Barding and Lacki. 2012). Centrarchids have appeared in 11-36% of otter scats and cyprinids have appeared in 11-86% of otter scats (Lagler and Ostenson, 1942; Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Wengeler et al., 2010; Barding and Lacki, 2012). Crayfish, where readily available, typically are consumed in greater proportion than fish during summer (Route and Peterson, 1988; Roberts et al, 2008). However, because crayfish are composed of a greater proportion of hard parts than other prey items, the dietary predominance of crayfish can be overestimated by scat analysis (Cottrell et at., 1996; Tollit et al., 1997; Marcus et al., 1998; van Dijk et al, 2007).

Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and bighead carp (H. nobilis), often recognized as "Asian carp," have become abundant in many Illinois waterbodies (Chick and Pegg, 2001; McClelland et al., 2012) and may influence available prey resources for otters. The effect of Asian carp on native fish and plankton communities are subjects of intense study, particularly in the Mississippi River basin (Williamson, 2004; Kolar et al., 2007; Sampson et al., 2009; Chapman and Hoff, 2011). Despite the many diet studies of otters, no published studies confirm otters consume Asian carp outside of aquaculture ponds (Lanszki et al., 2001; Lanszki and Molnar, 2003; Kortan et al., 2007). Additionally, most diet studies in North America occurred before Asian carp arrived or occurred in areas previously without Asian carp (Ryder, 1955; Knudsen and Hale, 1968; Chabreck et al., 1982; Roberts et al., 2008; Crimmins et al., 2009; Barding and Lacki, 2012). Determining the extent to which otters prey on Asian carp is crucial to further understanding the influence these invasive species have on otters and vice versa.

Our primary objective was to estimate the presence of Asian carp in the diet of otters using scat analysis. We used frequency of occurrence to compare scat collected from waterbodies with Asian carp present to waterbodies with Asian carp absent and predicted otters would consume Asian carp when present. We also compared the difference in diet between seasons and land cover types and predicted there would be seasonal differences in the diet for crayfish and amphibians but no difference in the diet between land cover types.

METHODS

We analyzed otter scat collected along waterbodies throughout central and southern Illinois. (The central UTM coordinate is 16s 344971 E 4270533 N. All other sampling sites occurred within a 160 km radius; Fig. 1). Sign surveys for river otters were conducted at 120 bridge sites, selected from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency stream database (A. M. Holtrop, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, pers.comm.). The sites captured a diverse array of freshwater habitats both with and without Asian carp present. Nineteen percent (n = 23) of sites occurred at 1-3 order headwater streams, 72% (n = 86) at 4-6 order streams, and 9% (n = 11) of sites at larger rivers such as the Saline, Little Wabash, Big Muddy, and Cache rivers. Thirty-nine percent (n = 47) of sites occurred in agriculturally dominated landscapes (>70% agriculture land cover), and remaining sites were located in forest (27.5%, n = 33), urban (2.5%, n = 3), and other cover types (31%, n = 37) (Luman et al., 1996).

Otter scats were collected opportunistically along 400 m and 800 m stream transects, which began at road bridges, during January-April 2013 and 2014. A team of two technicians visited each site four times per season. The scat was stored in a Whirl-Pak bag, placed on ice as soon as possible in the field, and stored at -20 C (Mowry et al., 2011; Barding and Lacki, 2012). We dried the scat samples at 60 C for 48 h and then sifted the scat using a no. 18 (1.00 mm) long-handled sieve (Mowry et at., 2011; Barding and Lacki, 2012).

We recorded the presence of fish by identifying scales, otoliths, and pharyngeal teeth in the sample. We acknowledge that this approach may exclude scaleless fishes, but expect any resulting bias to be similar across seasons and landcover types. Crayfish were identified by their exoskeleton. Herptiles (which we presumed to be amphibians on the basis of their importance in prior studies of otter diet) have more robust bones than fish and were discerned from small mammals by a lack of hair found in the scat sample. Prey types were identified using reference collections, taxonomic keys (Duellman and Trueb, 1986; Daniels, 1996), and photo references.

We examined scats for presence of Asian carp otoliths and pharyngeal teeth and calculated their percentage occurrence in the otter's diet. Fish otoliths and pharyngeal teeth have commonly been used as identifying structures in earlier studies of otter diets(Greer, 1955; Trites and Joy, 2005; Cote et at., 2008a; Wengeler et al., 2010). Ruiz-Olmo et al. (1998) found European otters (Lutra lutra) prefer to begin fish consumption by eating the heads, but heads from larger fish (>30 cm) were less frequently consumed. We used physical references of Asian carp sagittal and lapilli otoliths and pharyngeal teeth in addition to photo references. It is not possible to distinguish visually silver carp from bighead carp by examining their otoliths. However, silver carp have fine horizontal striations on the interior side of their pharyngeal teeth, whereas bighead carp teeth are smooth (Chu, 1935; Yokote, 1956; Spataru et al., 1983). Fish scales were used in previous diet studies to differentiate species (Knudsen and Hale, 1968; Crait and Ben-David, 2006; Barding and Lacki, 2012). However, differentiating Asian carp from other cyprinids, especially juveniles, using visual scale identification is difficult and therefore was not attempted in this study.

To categorize Asian carp presence at the survey sites, we compiled all fish sampling data from Illinois Department of Natural Resources for the stream sites where scat was collected and also referenced the online state stream database (http://dnr.illinois.gov/IBICalculation/Select SamplesForm.aspx, accessed 02 Aug 2014). Geographic Information Systems (GIS) was used to map Asian carp distribution given Asian carp were not present at all survey sites. We determined the occurrence of Asian carp in otter scat collected from sites with Asian carp present (Fig. 1).

We used 2X2 contingency tables and Fisher's exact test to compare the frequency of occurrence of each prey type (fish, crayfish, and amphibians) in otter diet between late winter and early spring seasons (January-February, March-April). Given the average temperature from January-February was 3.1 C and from March-April was 10.3 C during the study period (www.wunderground.com, 2015), we predicted consumption of crayfish and amphibians would be higher during March-April than January-February. We used 2X3 contingency tables and Fisher's exact test to compare the frequency of occurrence of each prey type in otter diet among three land cover types: forest, agriculture, and mixed. Sites were classified based on dominant land cover type (>50% cover) within a 400 m buffer around the survey location in a GIS. Mixed land cover was defined as not having a dominant land cover type (<50% cover). All statistical tests were considered significant at P < 0.05 and were conducted with SPSS 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

RESULTS

We analyzed 155 otter scat samples from 43 sites: 56 (36.1%) samples from 2013 and 99 (63.9%) samples from 2014. Of these 43 sites, 14 were classified as forested, 15 were agricultural, and 14 had mixed landcover. Forty (25.8%) samples were collected as a solitary spraint and 115 (74.2%) samples were collected from 32 latrines. Asian carp were known to be present in 18 (15%) of the 120 surveyed sites. Otter scat was collected from six of those sites but only one site had otter scat (n = 2) containing Asian carp remains. Evidence of Asian carp was found in otter scat from two additional sites (n = 1 each) where there were no database records of Asian carp being present. Therefore, Asian carp pharyngeal teeth or otoliths occurred in four (2.6%) scat samples.

Fish and crayfish were consumed in the greatest proportion, occurring in 140 (90.3%) and 87 (56.f%) scat samples, respectively. Amphibians occurred in 19 (12.3%) scat samples with 12 (63.2%) of those samples collected during January-February and seven (36.8%) during March-April. We found hair (unknown species) in four (2.6%) scat samples, but the samples did not contain additional evidence of mammal consumption, therefore the hair potentially could be from grooming. We found 220 otoliths in 48 (31.0%) scat samples and pharyngeal teeth in six (3.9%) scat samples from fish other than Asian carp. We found centrarchid otoliths in 26 (16.8%) scat samples.

Frequency of occurrence of amphibians in the scat was similar between seasons (Table 1). However, frequency of occurrence of crayfish increased from January-February to March-April. We found suggestive evidence that frequency of occurrence of fish was higher in January-February than in March--April (Table 1). Frequency of occurrence was similar among land cover types for each prey type (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

We provide the first definitive evidence of North American river otters consuming Asian carp. The lack of Asian carp remains in scat collected from sites with Asian carp present could be the result of a limited number of samples or heads from larger fish (>30 cm) being less frequently consumed (Ruiz-Olmo et al., 1998). In addition, otters consume prey in relation to abundance (Melquist et al., 2003, Kruuk, 2006; Penland and Black, 2009). Therefore, Asian carp abundance could have been low at the sites where we did not find evidence of Asian carp in the scat samples, potentially due to the downstream movement of Asian carp in the winter (Coulter et al., 2012). We also found evidence of Asian carp in scat samples from areas with no previous confirmation of Asian carp being present. Monitoring and sampling of Asian carp in Illinois are ongoing because they are prolific dispersers (Sampson et al., 2009; Freedman et al., 2012). Therefore, discovery of new sites containing Asian carp is not unexpected. Additionally, otters could have been foraging in nearby waterbodies containing Asian carp.

Our findings are consistent with previous studies confirming fish and crayfish as primary prey items of river otters, followed by amphibians (Greer, 1955; Knudsen and Hale, 1968; Serfass et al., 1990; Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Barding and Lacki, 2012). The high proportion offish present in the diet corresponds with previous studies indicating a high reliance on fish as prey during winter (Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Crait and Ben-David, 2006; Crimmins et al, 2009; Barding and Lacki, 2012). Frequency of crayfish occurrence increased during March-April. We expected crayfish consumption would increase in the summer potentially due to the increased crayfish availability and possibly a decreased ability of otters to capture fish due to their increased swimming speeds with warmer water temperatures (Erlinge, 1968; Flint. 1977; Wardle, 1980). The frequency of occurrence for amphibians in otter diets did not appear to differ seasonally. Although amphibians typically are more available in warmer months, their proportion in the diet was similar between seasons and with reported frequencies (Ryder, 1955; Knudsen and Hale, 1968; Stearns and Serfass, 2005; Roberts et at., 2008). Frequency of occurrence did not differ statistically between seasons for amphibians and fish, although we cannot rule out a biologically significant difference. However, the time frames we set for the seasons were a fairly short range and could have been too short to detect differences in diet. Furthermore, the difference in proportions of crayfish could be attributed to greater seasonal fluctuations in abundance (Jcdrzejewska et al, 2001).

Fish species are highly influenced by the surrounding land cover and size of waterbody (Gorman and Karr. 1978; Lammert and Allan, 1999). However, we did not find evidence that land cover types influenced the frequency of occurrence of prey types at the sampled sites. Prey availability seemed to be the primary factor that influenced the diet composition of otters as opposed to different habitats (Kemenes and Nechay, 1990). Jcdrzejewska el al. (2001) found otter diets depended on habitat types. However, habitat types were defined by waterbody size and type and likely are not comparable to the habitat types we had in this study.

Our study suggests otoliths and pharyngeal teeth enable efficient identification offish species in otter diet; either in addition to fish scale identification or used solely when searching for a particular species of interest. We found a considerable number of fish otoliths in the otter scat samples. Otoliths are characteristic for many species of fish and can easily be identified (Cote et al., 2008a, b; Crimmins et al., 2009). Although Asian carp otoliths can be exceptionally small (<2 mm) and difficult to discover in scat, otoliths can be a feasible option for identifying fish species in otter diets (Cote et al., 2008b) and can provide ancillary information. For instance, because we found centrarchid otoliths in each sample containing Asian carp otoliths, our scat analysis does not suggest that Asian carp have supplanted other commonly identified prey in otter diets. We suggest future otter dietary studies involving Asian carp use pharyngeal teeth as a distinguishing structure to differentiate silver carp from bighead carp. Asian carp populations are expected to continue to expand and increase in abundance; therefore, future studies also may focus on the effect of the Asian carp invasion on otter diets in other portions of otter range.

Acknowledgments.--This study was funded by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (Federal Aid Project W-135-R) and the Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. We thank G. W. Whitledge for his contribution and review comments. We also thank Illinois landowners for their cooperation in allowing us to conduct surveys on their property.

LITERATURE CITED

Barding, E. E. and M. J. Lacki. 2012. Winter diet of river otters in Kentucky. Northeast. Nat.. 19:157-104.

Chabreck, R. H., J. E. Holcombe, R. G. Linscombe, and N. E. Kinler. 1982. Winter foods of river otters from saline and fresh environments in Louisiana. Proc. Ann. Conf. Southeastern Assoc. Fish and Wildl. Agencies, 36:473-483.

Chapman, D. C. and M. H. Hoff. 2011. Invasive Asian carps of North America. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 74, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Chick, J. H. and M. A. Pegg. 2001. Invasive carp in the Mississippi basin. Science. 292:2250-2251.

Chu, Y. T. 1935. Comparative studies on the scales and on the pharyngeals and their teeth in Chinese cyprinids with particular reference to taxonomy and evolution. Biological Bulletin of St. John's University, New York, USA.

Cote, D., H. M.J. Stewart, R. S. Gregory, J. Gosse, J. J. Reynolds, G. B. Stenson, and E. H. Miller. 2008a. Prey selection by marine-coastal river otters (Lontra canadensis) in Newfoundland, Canada. J. Mammal., 89:1001-1011.

--, R. S. Gregory, and H. M. J. Stewart. 2008b. Size-selective predation by river otter (Lontra canadensis) improves refuge properties of shallow coastal marine nursery habitats. Can. J. Zool., 86:1324-1328.

Cottrell., P. E., A. W. Trites, and E. H. Miller. 1996. Assessing the use of hard parts in faeces to identify harbour seal prey: results of captive-feeding trials. Can. J. Zool., 74:875-880.

Coulter, A., R. R. Goforth, and J. Amberg. 2012. Movements and spawning of bigheaded carps in the upper Wabash River, Indiana, USA: 2012 update. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, U.S.A.

Crait, J. R. and M. Ben-David. 2006. River otters in Yellowstone Lake depend on a declining cutthroat trout population. J. Mammal., 87:485-494.

Crimmins, S. M., N. M. Roberts, and D. A. Hamilton. 2009. Effects of prey size on scat analysis to determine river otter (Lontra canadensis) diet. Wildl. Biol., 15:449-453.

Daniels, R. A. 1996. Guide to the identification of scales of inland fishes of northeastern North America. New York State Mus. Bull.. 488:1-97.

Duellman, W. E. and L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, New York, U.S.A.

Erlinge, S. 1968. Food studies on captive otters (Lutra lutra). Oikos 19:259-270.

Flint, R. W. 1977. Seasonal activity, migration, and distribution of the crayfish, (Pacifastacus leniusculus), in Lake Tahoe. Am. Midl. Nat., 97:280-292.

Freedman, J. A., S. E. Butler, and D. H. Wahl. 2012. Impacts of invasive Asian carps on native food webs. University of Illinois, Kaskaskia Biological Station, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.

Gorman, O. T. and J. R. Karr. 1978. Habitat structure and fish communities. Ecology 59:507-515.

Greer, K. R. 1955. Yearly food habits of the river otter in the Montana, Thompson Lakes region, northwestern as indicated by scat analyses. Am. Midi. Nat., 54:299-313.

Jedrzejewska, B., V. E. Sidorovich, M. M. Pikulik, and W. Jedrzejewski. 2001. Feeding habits of the otter and the American mink in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland) compared to other Eurasian populations. Ecography 24:165-180.

Kemenes, I. and G. Nechay. 1990. The food of otters (Lutra lutra) in different habitats in Hungary. Acta TherioL, 35:17-24.

Knudsen, G. J. and J. B. Hale. 1968. Food habits of otters in the Great Lakes region. J. Wildl. Manage., 32:89-93.

Kolar, C. S., D. C. Chapman, W. R. Courtenay, C. M. Housel, J. D. Williams, and D. P. Jennings. 2007. Bigheaded carps: a biological synopsis and environmental risk assessment. American Fisheries Society Publication 33, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.

Kortan, D., Z. Adamek, and S. Polakova. 2007. Winter predation by otter, Lutra lutra on carp pond systems in South Bohemia (Czech Republic). Folia Zool., 56:416-428.

Kruuk, H. 2006. Otters: ecology, behaviour and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York, U.S.A.

Lagler, K. F. and B. T. Ostenson. 1942. Early spring food of the otter in Michigan. J. Wildl. Manage., 6:244-254.

Lammert, M. and J. D. Allan. 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environ. Manage., 23:257-270.

Lanszki, J., S. KOrmendi, C. Hancz, and T. G. Martin. 2001. Examination of some factors affecting selection of fish prey by otters (Eulra lutra) living by eutrophic fish ponds. J. Zool., 255:97-103.

--and T. Molnar. 2003. Diet of otters living in three different habitats in Hungary. Folia Zool., 52:378-388.

Luman, D., M. Joselyn, and L. Suloway. 1996. Critical trends assessment project: landcover database. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

Marcus, J., W. Don Bowf.n, and J. D. Eddington. 1998. Effects of meal size on otolith recovery from fecal samples of gray and harbor seals. Mar. Mammal Sri., 14:789-802.

McClelland, M. A., G. G. Sass, T. R. Cook, K. S. Irons, N. N. Michaels, T. M. O'Hara, and C. S. Smith. 2012. The long-term Illinois River fish population monitoring program. Fisheries, 37:340-350.

Melquist, W. E., P. J. Jr Polechla, and D. Toweill. 2003. River otter (Lontra canadensis), p. 708-734. In: G. A. Feldhamer. B. C. Thompson, and J. A. Chapman, (eds). Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. 2nd edition. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

Mowry, R. A., M. E. Gompper, J. Beringer, .and L. S. Eggert. 2011. River otter population size estimation using noninvasive latrine surveys. J. Wildl. Manage., 75:1625-1636.

Penland, T. F. and J. M. Black. 2009. Seasonal variation in river otter diet in coastal northern California. Northwest. Nat., 90:233-237.

Roberts, N. M., C. F. Rabeni, J. S. Stanovick, and D. A. Hamilton. 2008. River otter, Lontra canadensis, food habits in the Missouri Ozarks. Can. Field Nat., 122:303-311.

Route, W. T. and R. O. Peterson. 1988. Distribution and abundance of river otter in Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. Resource Management Report MWR-10, USDI National Park Service, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Ruiz-Olmo, J., J. Jimenez, and A. Margalida. 1998. Capture and consumption of prey of the otter (Lutra lutra) in Mediterranean freshwater habitats of the Iberian peninsula. Galemys 10:209-226.

Ryder, R. A. 1955. Fish predation by the otter in Michigan. J. Wildl. Manage., 19:497-498.

Sampson, S. J., J. II. Chick, and M. A. Pegg. 2009. Diet overlap among two Asian carp and three native fishes in backwater lakes on the Illinois and Mississippi rivers. Biol. Invasions. 11:483-496.

Serfass, T. L., L. M. Rymon, .and R. P. Brooks. 1990. Feeding relationships of river otters in northeastern Pennsylvania. Trans. Northeast Section Wildl. Soc., 47:43-53.

Spataru, P., G. W. Wohlfarth, and G. Hulata. 1983. Studies on the natural food of different fish species in intensively manured polyculture ponds. Aquaculture 35:283-298.

Stearns, C. R. and T. L. Serfass. 2005. Food habits and fish prey size selection of a newly colonizing population of river otters (Lontra canadensis) in eastern North Dakota. Am. Midi. Nat., 165:169184.

Swimley, T. J., T. L. Serfass, R. P. Brooks, and W. M. Tzilkowski 1998. Predicting river otter latrine sites in Pennsylvania. Wildlife Soc. B., 26:836-845.

Tollit, D. L., M. J. Steward, P. M. Thompson, G.J. Pierce, M. B. Santos, and S. Hughes. 1997. Species and size differences in the digestion of otoliths and beaks: implications for estimates of pinniped diet composition. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sri., 54:105-119.

Trites, A. W. and R. Joy. 2005. Dietary analysis from fecal samples: how many scats are enough? J. Mammal., 86:704-712.

Van Dijk, J., K. Hauge, A. Landa, R. Andersen, and R. May. 2007. Evaluating scat analysis methods to assess wolverine (Culo guio) diet. Wildl. Biol., 13:62-67.

Wardle, C. S. 1980. Effects of temperature on the maximum swimming speed of fishes. Pages 519-553 in M. A. Ali, editor. Environmental physiology of fishes. Plenum Press, New York, New York, USA.

Wengeler, W. R., D. A. Kelt, and M. L. Johnson. 2010. Ecological consequences of invasive lake trout on river otters in Yellowstone National Park. Biol. Cons., 143:1144-1153.

Williamson, C. J. 2004. Population demographics and feeding ecology of silver carp in the middle Mississippi River. Thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA.

Yokote, M. 1956. Morphological notes on the two Chinese carps, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and Aristichthys nobilis. Bull. Freshwater Fish. Res. Lab., 6:61-70.

PRESTON D. FELTROP (1), Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 62901 CLAYTON K. NIELSEN, Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Department of Forestry, Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 62901, and ERIC M. SCHAUBER, Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, 62901

(1) Corresponding author: e-mail: pfeltrop@siu.edu

Submitted 3 December 2016;

accepted 15 June 2016
Table 1.--Frequencies of occurrence (%) of prey items for otter
(Lontra canadensis) scat samples (n = 155) collected in southern
Illinois during 2013-2014. We used 2X2 contingency tables and
Fisher's exact test (df= 1) to compare prey occurrence between
seasons (a = 0.05)

Prey items                    Season

               January-February     March-April
                 (n - 108 scat)    (n = 47 scat)

             n with prey    %     n with prey    %     P-value

Fish             101       93.5       39        83.0    0.07
Crayfish         54        50.0       33        70.2    0.02
Amphibian        12        11.1        7        14.9    0.56

Table 2.--Frequencies of occurrence (%) of prey items by land cover
types for otter (Lontra canadensis) scat samples (n = 155) in
southern Illinois during 2013-2014. We used 2X3 contingency tables
and Fisher's exact test (df= 2) to compare prey occurrence between
land cover types (a = 0.05)

Land cover

Prey items        Forest              Agriculture
               (n = 47 scat)          (n - 51 scat)

             n with prey    %     n with prey    %

Fish             44        93.6       40        78.4
Crayfish         30        63.8       31        60.8
Amphibian         9        19.1        4        7.8

Prey items        Mixed
               (n = 57 scat)

             n with prey    %     P-value

Fish             56        98.2    0.11
Crayfish         26        51.0    0.70
Amphibian         6        10.5    0.27
COPYRIGHT 2016 University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Notes and Discussion Piece
Author:Feltrop, Preston D.; Nielsen, Clayton K.; Schauber, Eric M.
Publication:The American Midland Naturalist
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:Oct 1, 2016
Words:4005
Previous Article:Invasive ants generate heterogeneity in patterns of seed survival.
Next Article:Individual identification of raccoons (Procyon lotor) using track plate foot printing.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters