Army struggles to maintain ground vehicle fleet.
On the aviation side, the funds needed to fix up the fleet will come from the cancelled Comanche program. But the Army may need to cut other programs or drastically change business practices in order to restore ground vehicles and spare parts accounts to acceptable levels, officials said.
"We are not getting more dollars. We have to do things smarter," said Maj. Gen. N. Ross Thompson III, commander of the Army Tank-Automotive and Armaments Command.
The main reason why the Army is in this predicament is that the combat vehicles deployed in Iraq--the Abrams tank and the Bradley infantry vehicle-were among those "legacy" systems that were scheduled to end production, so that Army had not budgeted any money for spares or repairs.
Now, the Army is having a tough time maintaining vehicle fleets at the required "readiness rates," Thompson said in a presentation to the 2004 Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Conference, in Monterey, Calif. "Readiness is really a challenge right now," said Thompson. "System sustainment really is causing problems."
TACOM alone will be $600 million short in the spare parts account for fiscal year 2004. "We have been trying to dig ourselves out of a hole," he said.
Thompson noted that, in this case, the Army created its own problems. When the service launched its so-called "transformation" to a lighter, more technologically advanced force, it cancelled programs viewed as obsolete, such as heavy armored vehicles. The intent was to shift the money into next-generation programs, such as the Stryker brigades and the Future Combat Systems. "We took nothing to take care of the existing systems," Thompson said. Those vehicles the Army intended to soon phase out of the fleet were the workhorses during the invasion and occupation of Iraq, and the Army now must come up with money for repairs and upgrades.
The overall $12 billion "resetting bill" for ground systems includes 1,555 tracked vehicles, 9,426 Humvees, 7,076 medium and heavy trucks, 3,579 trailers, 82 multiple launch rocket systems and nine Patriot air-defense battalions. The aviation repair backlog has 248 Apaches, 204 Chinooks and 451 Black Hawk helicopters.
The truck fleet, particularly, is taking a beating in the budget. Nearly one-fourth of the Army's 240,000 trucks are in Iraq. The 2004 supplemental appropriation Congress approved last year included $808 million for trucks repairs, spare parts and up armored Humvees. But the long-term budget for truck programs is relatively small, compared to other big-ticket Defense Department projects.
The 2004-2009 budget has $8.9 billion for new trucks, a sum that probably won't be enough to replace the vehicles lost in combat and to finance the development of next-generation trucks, said congressional sources.
Charlie Huoy, minority staff director at the Senate defense appropriations subcommittee said the current Defense Department budget is "not good news for the Army."
J.J. Gertler, professional staff member of the House Armed Services Committee, questioned the Pentagon's funding priorities. He noted that the entire five-year budget for Army trucks is less than one year's budget for the Missile Defense Agency. "Is this the right balance?" he asked.
The production of existing trucks is scheduled to end within the next five years, and there are no replacement programs on the horizon yet. Under current plans, Humvee production would end by 2007, the Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles by 2008, and the heavy logistics trucks by 2007.
"We don't have enough money to replace all these trucks by 2030," said Lt. Gen. Claude V. Christianson, Army deputy chief of staff for logistics.
A $41 million five-year research and development program, called the Future Tactical Truck System, is expected to pave the way for a new generation of vehicles. Run by the Army's National Automotive Center. FTTS is supposed to address the technological deficiencies in current trucks, such as survivability and lack of command-control and communications systems aboard.
The NAC was expected to solicit industry proposals for FFTS last month. Both military and industry experts, however, question the Army's commitment to this project and wonder if it would not make more sense to spend the money to upgrade current trucks.
"FTTS needs to be a continuous process," said Christianson. He believes that new technology is needed on today's trucks, and that the Army cannot afford to wait for these technologies until FTTS develops a new vehicle design.
A case in point is the "movement tracking system," a GPS tracking device installed on Army and Marine trucks in Iraq, to monitor their movements. Christianson lamented the lack of standards across the trucks fleets, which means that not every truck can accommodate devices such as MTS. "Why doesn't every truck come with some connection that you plug into?" he asked.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Erwin, Sandra I.|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2004|
|Previous Article:||Truck crews get crash course in survival.|
|Next Article:||Changes on the way for Army logistics ops.|