Printer Friendly

Application of multi-agent and genetic algorithm in network reconfiguration of ship power system.

I. INTRODUCTION

With the development of industrialization, the generation capacity and scale of ship power system (SPS) are keeping on enlarging, the way of the system works and its protection become more complex. it is important to reconfigure the system as fast as possible when faults occur. Because of many differences between the ship and the land power system, the network reconfiguration of land power system which bases on how to lower the network loss of system does not work well on the ship. Network reconfiguration of SPS is to be researched.

Network reconfiguration of SPS is a non-linear combinatorial optimization problem. Sanjeev K used improved algorithm to reconfigure, but it cannot restore the loads as much as possible [1]; Nagata T used multi-agent technique to reconfigure, but it also cannot make the result most optimal [2].

Based on analyzing many methods in existence and according to the characteristics of SPS, a multi-agent and genetic algorithm (MAGA) is presented to solve the SPS network reconfiguration problem. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that: MAGA can reconfigure the network of SPS better.

II. SIMPLIFIED NETWORK MODEL AND RECONFIGURATION MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF SPS

A. Simplified Network Model

Large SPS is usually made up of several power stations, every station is composed by several generators. A ring or ladder power system is built by loop switches among buses and main switchboards, the loads get power from buses or distribution switchboards. important loads can get power through normal routes or alternative ones by automatic or manual switches. The loads can be graded into three ranks, of which Rank 1 and Rank 2 loads usually have two power supply routes, the normal one and the alternative.

The research of this paper is based on the typical three-power-station ladder shipboard power system, its simplified network model is given in Fig. 1.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The system is made up of 6 generators G, 18 loads (including static loads i and motors M), 10 feeders F and 6 jumper wires L. The switchboards and jumper wires divide the whole system into three power stations. The alternative routes of important loads are connected by dashed lines.

According to the graph theory, in Fig. 1 the electrical devices connection wires are abstracted to be branches, while the connection points between the devices to be nodes. So there are totally 15 nodes and 51 branches in the whole system.

B. Network Reconfiguration Mathematical Model

SPS requires the maximum load restore and supply power for important loads (Rank 1 and Rank 2) in priority after network reconfiguration, and make the operation times of switches as few as possible. So the object function can be expressed as following

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

where [L.sub.g1i], [L.sub.g2i], [L.sub.g3i] are the 3 grade loads, [n.sub.1], [n.sub.2], [n.sub.3] are the total number of each grade loads, [[lambda].sub.1], [[lambda].sub.2], [[lambda].sub.3] are the weight coefficients of each grade loads, [S.sub.x] is the total operation times of switches, [eta] is the punitive weight coefficient. We can get the maximum important load restore and the least operation times of switches by choosing the proper weight coefficients. For example, [[lambda].sub.1]=1 for Rank 1 loads, [[lambda].sub.2]=0.1 for Rank 2 loads, [[lambda].sub.3]=0.01 for Rank 3 load.

The network reconfiguration of SPS should be constrained as following:

1) The connectivity constraints and radiate limit of the system. There is only one close normal or alternative route of power supply for the important load which can be restored;

2) The limit of system capacity. It indicates that when the load to be restored connects with the bus, branches or generators should not overload. If it happens, unload should be considered.

III. MULTI-AGENT AND GENETIC ALGORITHM (MAGA)

A. Application Of Multi-Agent in Network Reconfiguration of SPS

Considering of regional autonomy of multi-agent [3], the set of non-switch devices controlled by switch devices on the same regional feeder can be regarded as one agent. Therefore, the SPS network may be divided into some separate power supply agents.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The SPS network shown in Fig. 1 can be divided into several feeder units. Each one is abstracted as a regional feeder agent. A regional feeder multi-agent network model is proposed, shown in Fig. 2.

The regional feeder agents are intelligent, they can judge and make decision autonomous. According to the operation condition of SPS, the regional feeder agents can communicate with adjacent agents so as to guarantee stable operation of SPS.

B. MAGA

Genetic algorithm (GA) is an iterative adaptive random searching method based on natural gene selection mechanism, it has better robust and search ability. Discrete states of switches and circuits are expressed as a series of binary codes to calculate and process easily [4].

Different from traditional GA, MAGA is based on improved feedback theory. The improved feedback evolves GA in specific direction in sample selection, gene covering position, crossover, mutation, and so on. MAGA makes regional feeder agents as individual codes, 0 and 1 represent states of power supply, 0 for no power, 1 for power supply. Based on agents' autonomy and activity, individuals in MAGA can communicate with others about genetic information. Especially in the process of crossover, mutation and optimal searching, regional feeder agent can change the individual codes in the smaller extension according to the object function, so as to change the network topology in the smaller extension and supply power in the optimal way.

The flow chart of SPS network reconfiguration based on MAGA is shown in Fig. 3.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

In the algorithm, formula (2), (3), (4) are to calculate individual selection probability, crossover probability, mutation probability.

Individual selection probability

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)

Crossover probability:

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)

Mutation probability:

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (4)

where [alpha], [beta] are constant adjustive factors, 0 [less than or equal to] [alpha] [less than or equal to] 1,0 [less than or equal to] [beta] [less than or equal to] 1; x is the individual; f ([x.sub.i]) is the object function; [s.sub.i] is the concentration of individuals; [f.sub.max] is the maximum fitness value; f is the fitness value of mutative individual; t is the iterative generation; [P.sub.r max,] [P.sub.r min] are the maximum and minimum crossover probability; [P.sub.u max], [P.sub.u min] are the maximum and minimum mutation probability; Gen is the maximum iterative times.

IV. SIMULATION RESULTS

For the SPS network model in Fig. 1, according to the different complexity degrees of faults, there are two cases to reconfigure using MAGA.

In the simulation, the number of individuals is 150, the maximum iterative generation is 200, the initial value of crossover probability is 0.8 (the maximum is 0.9, the minimum is 0.7), the initial value of mutation probability is 0.1 (the maximum is 0.1, the minimum is 0.07).

The individual codes after initialization are: 111111111111100001111111110000111001111111110011111

A. Example 1

Assuming a fault occurs in regional feeder agent 9, the individual codes with fault are:

111111111011100001111111110000111001111111110011111

MAGA is used to carry out network reconfiguration, simulation results are as following:

1) Regional feeder agent 27: the initial value is 0, the ultimate value is 1.

2) Fitness value is 5.63265, switch operation times (SOT) is 1.

The changes of fitness and SOT are shown in Fig. 4.

Simulation results show that regional feeder agent 9 communicates with adjacent agent when fault occurs, and choose the alternative route (regional feeder agent 27) to supply power. MAGA gets the best fitness value 5.63265 from the 50th iteration, but only until the 82nd iteration it gets the minimum SOT: 1. So we get the best network reconfiguration solution from the 82nd iteration.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

B. Example 2

Assuming faults occur in regional feeder agent 11, 20, 21, 24, 49, the individual codes with faults are:

111111111110100001110011010000111001111111110011101

MAGA is used to carry out network reconfiguration, simulation results are as following:

1) Regional feeder agent 34: the initial value is 0, the ultimate value is 1. Regional feeder agent 44: the initial value is 0, the ultimate value is 1.Regional feeder agent 45: the initial value is 0, the ultimate value is 1.

2) Fitness value is 5.61035, SOT is 3.

The changes of fitness and SOT are shown in Fig. 5.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

When faults occur, the regional feeder agents with fault communicate with adjacent agents. The adjacent agents would firstly estimate self-capacity. If all the constraint conditions are satisfied, they would supply power to the fault agents by alternative routes. MAGA gets the best fitness value 5.61035 from the 116th iteration, but only until the 119th iteration it gets the minimum SOT: 3. So we get the best network reconfiguration solution from the 119th iteration.

C. Comparison with Traditional GA

In order to verify the validity of MAGA, the simulation results of two examples are compared with traditional GA, shown in Table I and II:

Table I and II show that the application of multi-agent could significantly enhance the effect of intelligent network reconfiguration. It can accelerate convergence and optimization of intelligent algorithm. In example 1, multi-agent speed up convergence and optimization of traditional GA. in example 2, based on the information exchange between agents, MAGA change the network topology in the minimum extension to reconfigure. It gets a better reconfiguration solution.

V. CONCLUSIONS

The simplified network model and reconfiguration mathematical model of SPS are established. GA and multi-agent technology are analyzed. Regional feeder agents are defined. Combining with multi-agent and GA, MAGA is presented. in this algorithm, regional feeder agents communicate with adjacent agents to accomplish SPS network reconfiguration. Simulation and comparison results show that MAGA can reconfigure SPS network faster and better.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.18.9.2795

Manuscript received March 19, 2012; accepted May 22, 2012. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant No.51177168.

REFERENCES

[1] K. Sanjeev, K. L. B. Srivastava, N. D. R. Sarma, "Shipboard power restored for active duty", IEEE Computer Applications in Power, vol. 15, pp. 16-23, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi .org/10.1109/MCAP.2002.1018818

[2] T. Nagata, H. A. Sasaki, "Multi-Agent Approach to Power System Restoration", IEEE Transactions on power systems, vol. 15, pp. 457-462, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi .org/10.1109/TPWRS .2002.1007918

[3] K. Rajesh, S. Devendra, K. Anupam, "A new hybrid multi-agent-based particle swarm optimization technique", Int. J. of Bio-Inspired Computation, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 259-269, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2009.024724

[4] X. Yang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, "Immune genetic algorithm in the restoration of power supply application", Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 80-86, 2004.

Zheng Wang (1,2), Li Xia (1), Yongji Wang (2)

(1) College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan, 430033, P.R. China

(2) Department of Control Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, P.R. China, phone: 86-13886038762 marchy618@163.com
TABLE I. SIMULATION RESULTS OF EXAMPLE 1 COMPARED WITH TRADITIONAL GA.

Algorithm     Optimal Network                      Fitness
Type          Reconfiguration Solution   MAX       MIN       AVG

Traditional   I6 is power supplied       5.63265   5.50843   5.58625
GA            by the alternative
              route 27
MAGA          I6 is power supplied       5.63265   5.50843   5.62283
              by the alternative
              route 27

Algorithm           SOT         Best
Type          MAX   MIN   AVG   Iteration

Traditional   18    1     5.5   115
GA

MAGA          18    0     3.9   82

TABLE II. SIMULATION RESULTS OF EXAMPLE 2 COMPARED
WITH TRADITIONAL GA.

Algorithm     Optimal Network                             Fitness
Type          Reconfiguration                     MAX      MIN      AVG
              Solution

              I9, I11, I12 are power
Traditional   supplied by the alternative     5.60255  5.50699  5.54698
GA            routes 4, 44, 45. I15 is power
              supplied by the alternative
              route 15. I10 is unloading.

MAGA          I9, I11, I12 are power          5.61035  5.55469  5.59243
              supplied by the alternative
              routes 34, 44, 45.

Algorithm           SOT         Best
Type          MAX   MIN   AVG   Iteration

Traditional   13    7     8.6   146
GA

MAGA          11    3     5.5   119
COPYRIGHT 2012 Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Telecommunications and Electronics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Wang, Zheng; Xia, Li; Wang, Yongji
Publication:Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9CHIN
Date:Sep 1, 2012
Words:2051
Previous Article:Supervisory control sustainability of technological processes after the network failure.
Next Article:Assessment of synchronous generator's influence on transmission network with significant level of voltage unbalance.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters