Printer Friendly

Appealing innocent spouse relief.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently considered the effects of the changes in the innocent spouse provision contained in the IRS Restructuring Act of 1998.

In 1966 Isaac Baranowicz and Lora Baran married. On their 1979-1982 tax returns, they claimed depreciation deductions from several equipment-leasing tax shelters. The IRS issued a deficiency notice denying these deductions. Following the couple's divorce, Lora Baran filed for innocent spouse relief under IRC sections 6015 (b) and (c), which contain part of the rules for such protection. The Tax Court granted her such relief under section 6015(c). Isaac Baranowicz appealed, but the IRS argued he lacked the standing to do so.

Result. For the IRS. To initiate an appeal, taxpayers must meet three conditions: They must allege a concrete injury, the injury must be traceable to the defendant's actions and a favorable decision must provide redress. Prior to the 1998 Restructuring Act, the courts would have held that granting Lora innocent spouse relief could not have affected Isaac's tax liability since he still would be liable for the entire deficiency under the joint and several liability rule.

Baranowicz argued that under the act a nonrequesting spouse could participate in the initial litigation and, therefore, would be entitled to appeal the decision.

The Ninth Circuit found that Baranowicz's participation in the initial litigation would not have changed his liability; he would have remained fully liable for the deficiency both before and after the lawsuit. The potential for reimbursement in any state court litigation is not relevant for federal purposes. Thus, because the federal liability was unchanged, the taxpayer did not meet the third requirement for an appeal (redress).

Baranowicz also argued that the 1998 act gave a nonrequesting taxpayer a stake in the outcome. According to the court, such a stake, even if it existed, did not grant the taxpayer a new right of appeal. The act simply provided for adequate notice of, and the ability to participate in, a proceeding in the Tax Court.

Nonrequesting spouses must be aware of and use their right to participate in an innocent spouse relief request at the IRS and Tax Court level. If the nonrequesting spouse chooses not to participate or loses at the Tax Court level, he or she then cannot appeal the decision.

* Isaac Baranowicz v. Commissioner, CA-9, 432 F3d 972.

What's Up With Uncle Sam?

The IRS increased the amount taxpayers can deduct for personal exemptions by $100 to $3,300 in tax year 2006.

Source: IRS, www.irs.gov.

Delinquent Filers, Beware!

For fiscal year 2005, the IRS caught almost 3.5 million tax dodgers, a 26% increase from fiscal year 2003.

Source: IRS, www.irs.gov.

Prepared by Edward J. Schnee, CPA, PhD, Hugh Culverhouse Professor of Accounting and director, MTA program, Culverhouse School of Accountancy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
COPYRIGHT 2006 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Schnee, Edward J.
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Jun 1, 2006
Words:470
Previous Article:Innocent spouse provisions and community property.
Next Article:Is Antarctica a foreign country?
Topics:


Related Articles
Protecting innocent spouses.
How innocent spouses spell relief.
The Tax Court's enhanced power to help innocent spouses.
Innocent spouse/domestic violence.
Is the Tax Court becoming a divorce court? The answer could change how the innocent spouse rules are interpreted.
Administrative appeal rights in innocent spouse cases.
IRS further clarifies innocent spouse equitable relief.
Separate liability requirements must be met prior to spouse's death.
Nonelecting innocent spouse rules.
Innocent spouse relief reversed.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters