Antitrust's "buck-naked" emperor. (For the Record).
The burden of proof has always been on the antitrust enthusiasts to show that antitrust theory makes sense and that there is evidence (from the cases, presumably) that antitrust increases efficient resource allocation. Yet for more than 100 years, the antitrust establishment of attorneys and academics has completely failed this burden of proof.
The fact remains that the emperor is (and has always been) buck-naked and it is not good science or strategy for serious antitrust critics to pretend that he may well have on some undergarments and possibly a T-shirt. Antitrust makes about as much scientific sense as astrology, and honest logic dictates that we recommend repeal. Our collective failure to say this straight out may be partially responsible for Microsoft and similar nightmares.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Dec 22, 2002|
|Previous Article:||Too insufferable for professional satirists. (The Final Word).|
|Next Article:||What about Patient Power? (For the Record).|
|Racing: Maguire waiting.|
|Joan Burnie: Mark my words Charlotte's right.|
|The emperor's new clothes for 2008? Finger points at Culture launch.|
|Negotiating buck naked; Doukhobors, public policy, and conflict resolution.|