Printer Friendly

Annual biomass loss of the loose-lying red algal community via macroalgal beach casts in the Vainameri area, NE Baltic Sea/Kinnitumata punavetikakoosluse aastane biomassi kadu Vainameres labi mereheidiste akumulatsiooni.

INTRODUCTION

The sea area of the West Estonian Archipelago (Vainameri) hosts the largest known mixed community of loose-lying Furcellaria lumbricalis (Huds.) Lamour and Coccotylus truncatus (Pall.) Wynne & Heine. The community covers up to 120 [km.sup.2] of sea bottom and forms more than 140 000 tonnes of biomass in Kassari Bay (Martin et al., 2006a). In this area the circular current and bottom morphology are preventing the community from drifting away, and promote the development of a specific drifting form of algal community (Martin et al., 1996). Commercial importance of the red alga F. lumbricalis is due to polysaccharides technologically extracted from the thallus (Bird et al., 1991; Truus et al., 1996; Tuvikene et al., 2006). The industrial exploitation of the community started in Saaremaa Island in 1966 (Kersen, 2005). The state of the drifting algal community has been monitored since the beginning of its industrial exploitation but investigations explaining the biomass formation and community fluctuation were initiated only recently. Nowadays a similar community is found only on the western coast of Canada (McLachlan et al., 1987; Sharp et al., 1993).

Previously, the marine wrack in the Vainameri area was studied by Trei (1965, 1968). More recent studies on the shores of Saaremaa Island were made in 1976. 1985 (Kukk & Rosenberg, 1985; Martin et al., 1996). In these investigations wrack was described for industrial purposes. In the 1980s also aero-observations over Kassari Bay were made in order to discover new wracks deposited immediately on shores after storm events (H. Kukk, pers. comm.). However, these studies do not provide any quantitative information on the accumulation of wrack.

The present investigation was prompted by lack of relevant information about algal biomass losses by natural processes. The aims of this study are (1) to describe the wrack accumulation patterns and taxonomic composition, (2) to assess annual losses of the loose-lying macroalgal community through casts ashore, and (3) to compare these amounts with the commercially harvested biomass of the community.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study area

Kassari Bay (also Hiiu Strait) extends for more than 600 [km.sup.2] (Mardiste, 1974) and is relatively isolated from the Baltic Proper and other regions of the Vainameri (the inner sea of the West Estonian Archipelago). According to the archive of the Estonian Hydrological and Meteorological Institute (EMHI) for winters 1970/1971.2004/2005, ice cover lasts on average 100 days in Kassari Bay. Salinity is typically between 6.0 and 6.7 (Suursaar et al., 2000, 2001).

Based on Virtsu station data, there is a strong seasonality wind pattern on the West Estonian coast (Kull, 1999), where SW winds are prevailing. The annual average wind speed is up to 6.7 m [s.sup.-1] in the Vainameri, but is higher in autumn and winter.

Two shore types dominate: till shore and gravel.pebble shore (Orviku, 1993). The bottom of the bay is relatively flat (Mardiste, 1970) as the 5 m isobath lies at 0.5.1 km from the studied shore sites in the NE of Saaremaa Island. Less than half of the sea area is under 5 m deep.

Circular currents and hollow bottom topography with prevailing depths of 7.10 m prevent the unattached red algae community from drifting the region. The community is found at the depth range of 5.9 m mainly on clay and sand bottoms.

Fieldwork

Data for the present study were collected at three sampling sites on the NE coast of Saaremaa Island from 21 April to 5 October 2002 (Fig. 1). These three sites were selected because they are adjacent to the 5 m isobath and considering also the historical aspect of wrack collection. The sites were visited monthly (seven times in all) during the ice-free season. In each study site three replicate shore sections were studied. The length of the sections ranged from 49 to 67 m. These replicate sections coincided with the location where visual observations were performed. The visual observations of the wrack were made to clarify whether new macroalgae have accumulated on the shore. In the case of fresh wrack (herein defined as stranded below driftline, sensu Orr et al., 2005) was present, algae were described (spatial distribution and macroscopic taxonomic composition) and measured (length, width, and thickness of the wrack ridge). Biomass samples were taken only when the unattached form of F. lumbricalis was found.

One sample was randomly taken within each replicate section (quadrate frame, 20 x 20 cm, n = 32). Thickness of each biomass sample was measured. The collected flora was packed, labelled, and then deep-frozen at -18[degrees]C.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Laboratory analyses

Three floristic components were separated for biomass determination: F. lumbricalis, C. truncatus, and other macrophytes. Other taxa in the samples were determined only qualitatively. Determination was made according to the keys of Trei (1991) and Leht (1999). The species list of macrophytobenthos followed the nomenclature presented in Nielsen et al. (1995). Specimens were dried at 60[degrees]C for two weeks until constant dry weights (accuracy [+ or -] 0.1 mg). The dry mass to volume ratio of the red algae F. lumbricalis and C. truncatus in the sampling frame (i.e. sample density) was used to calculate the biomass of the shore casts (g [m.sup.-1.sub.shoreline]). The volume of algal species was determined by multiplying the sample surface area by the sample height. As the intervals between observations were unequal the biomasses were divided by the number of days between data collection.

Data analyses

Wind data of Virtsu station (28.02.2002.08.12.2002) by EMHI were used. Wind velocities from favourable wind directions (according to shore site exposure azimuth) for each study site were selected. Significant wind velocity was defined as moderate and strong wind ([greater than or equal to] 5 m [s.sup.-1]) when wind induces sufficient wave driven and near-bottom currents for algal redeposition (detailed wind.currents interactions see Raudsepp & Kouts, 2001; Suursaar et al., 2001).

Shoreline bounding Kassari Bay (Fig. 1) was divided into 24 sections, wherein the average distances between the 5 m isobath and each section were measured. Several sections were located at Soela Strait, Hiiumaa islets, and Muhu Island and around Koinastu islets (Fig. 1). The length of the shoreline was measured with a step of 500 m at the chart (Estonian Maritime Administration, 2001).

Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to describe the functional relationship between wrack accumulation, sum of significant wind velocities, distance of the 5 m isobath, and wave exposure (StatSoft Inc., 2006). The wave exposure for each site was calculated by measuring the radius (in degrees) of the site exposure to the sea using a nautical chart at a 1 : 50 000 scale (Wenberg & Thomsen, 2005). Data are presented in Table 1. Prior to analysis some variables were squared because of the occurrence of polynomial relations and/or multiplied if interactions were expected.

Based on the obtained regression equations the wrack accumulation of F. lumbricalis and C. truncatus for each period between sampling (6 in total) and shore section (24 in total) were calculated. Using spatial extrapolation, the dry weights of beach-cast macroalgae for each section were calculated by multiplying the wrack biomass (g [m.sup.1.sub.shoreline]) by the length of the specific section (m). Total wrack biomass accumulated during the study period was obtained when the values of dry weights were summed and transformed to wet weight (by ratio of 1 : 5; according to our measurements and analogously to Greenwell et al., 1984). The same calculation procedures were applied for ante- and post-observation ice-free wrack accumulation periods (i.e. 28.02-21.04 and 06.11-08.12).

In total 197 days were covered by observations and 168 days were not. According to ice charts (from EMHI archives) the dates of ice break-up and ice formation were 27 February 2002 and 9 December 2002, respectively. Thus, the ice-free period not covered by observations was 85 days in 2002. The beach casts were assumed to be negligible during the period of ice cover; therefore, annual wrack accumulations were defined as wrack accumulation during the ice-free period.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Fresh wrack (beach cast macroalgae) was observed during every sampling occasion. The wrack included F. lumbricalis on five occasions (see Table 2). Storm casts in August and September did not contain F. lumbricalis because of unfavourable winds (mostly from southerly directions). The accumulation values varied strongly and were the highest in April. However, these values reflected the whole period between the break-up of ice (27.02) and the first sampling occasion (21.04). There is a possibility that these measurements included also beach casts since autumn 2001. The wrack of F. lumbricalis accumulated slightly or was missing between May and September, which resembles accumulation patterns elsewhere (e.g. Piriz et al., 2003).

The formation of wrack varied within wide ranges both by biomass and coverage. The wrack was found as regular and homogeneous ridges/mounds to fragmented single blotches. The width of wrack varied between 0.02 and 30 m and the thickness between 0.002 and 0.5 m. The average dimensions of the wrack at the sampling points are shown in Table 2.

A total of 32 macrophyte biomass samples were analysed. Altogether 14 taxa were recorded throughout the study period: 5 species of red, 2 species of brown, and 2 species of green algae, 1 charophyte species, 5 species of flowering plants, and 3 macrozoobenthos taxa (Table 3). Most important taxonomic components of the wrack biomass samples are given in Fig. 2.

The proportion of the red algae F. lumbricalis and C. truncatus in the biomass samples was 0.3-39.9% and 0.1-29.2%, respectively. The highest percentage of both algae was found in April. The average taxonomic composition over 3 study sites of the wrack indicates that dominants were C. truncatus (6% of the wrack total biomass), F. lumbricalis (13%), and the rest of the macrophytes jointly (81%) during the observation period.

The red algae F. lumbricalis and C. truncatus accumulated on shores at a rate of 5.2 DWt [km.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1] and 2.4 DWt [km.sup.-1] [yr.sup.-1], respectively. The highest amounts of both species accumulated in the first (ante-observation) period. As the periods between sampling were not of equal duration, the accumulated wrack was divided by the number of days in each period in order to reveal seasonality in the wrack accumulation (see Fig. 3).

The following empirical relationships were obtained:

F = 0.04[T.sup.2] - 4.90(TI) - 9.15E + 943, (1)

where F--wrack biomass accumulation of F. lumbricalis (DWg [m.sup.-1]),

T--sum of significant wind velocities (m [s.sup.-1]),

I--distance of the 5 m isobath (km),

E--wave exposure (deg)

C = 0.03T 2 ? 4.34(TI) ? 6.23E + 699, (2)

where C - wrack biomass accumulation of C. truncatus (DWg [m.sup.-1]).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

These two empirical models were relatively good ([R.sup.2] = 0.65 for F. lumbricalis and [R.sup.2] = 0.53 for C. truncatus; P < 0.005), although the sample size was rather poor (n =18) and the biomass varied in a wide range.

The loose-lying algae F. lumbricalis and C. truncatus were cast ashore at the same times and rates. A very strong linear correlation between the biomasses of these taxa in the wrack ([R.sup.2] = 0.85) suggests that the algae responded similarly to hydrodynamic conditions. The biomass ratio of F. lumbricalis to C. truncatus in the wrack was similar to that in the natural habitat (Martin et al., 2006b).

According to our statistical model, the red alga F. lumbricalis was mainly cast ashore in autumn (see Fig. 4) when N- and NE-winds were prevailing. Relatively large amounts of wrack were sporadically recorded in summer. In general this wrack did not consist of F. lumbricalis, but mainly of Zostera marina L. (formerly also the dominant wrack taxa (Trei, 1965)), Fucus vesiculosus L., and Potamogeton pectinatus L.

The wrack formation of F. lumbricalis and C. truncatus during the period from April to November was estimated at 1026 tonnes and 402 tonnes in wet weight, respectively (Fig. 4). During the remaining ice-free season (85 days) the algal biomass amounted to 434 and 163 tonnes, including the first sampling occasion on 21 April.

Thus, the total annual losses of the red algal community through storm casts were estimated at 4779 tonnes in wet weight. As the amounts of wrack collected on Kassari Bay shores have decreased during the last 15 years and have been negligible since 2001 (by EstAgar data) it is commercially advisable to harvest storm casts from the shores of the area in addition to traditional harvesting of red algal stocks.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

The calculated annual losses via wrack deposition represent ~3% of the community standing stock in summer 2002 (Martin et al., 2006b). Based on the recent production estimates (Martin et al., 2006a) the losses due to beach cast made up approximately 20% of the potential annual production of the algal community. The commercial exploitation in the form of bottom trawling of the loose algal community made up only 1/5 of the losses due to beach cast (Kersen & Martin, 2005).

The wrack accumulations during the study period were strongly related to the inner-annual meteorological and hydrological conditions in the sea area (according to empirical models 1 and 2). The results show that coastal slope, wind velocity, and wave exposure describe a large part of the variability of macroalgal beach casts. It is likely that bottom and surface currents and wave activity are behind the relationships.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was financed by the Estonian Ministry of Environment, Target Financing Programme No. 0182578s03, and Estonian Science Foundation grant No. 6750. The authors are thankful to Kristjan Herkul for his assistance in field and laboratory.

Received 3 January 2007, in revised form 21 September 2007

REFERENCES

Bird, C. J., Saunders, G. W. & McLachlan, J. 1991. Biology of Furcellaria lumbricalis (Hudson) Lamouroux (Rhodophyta: Gigartinales), a commercial carrageenophyte. J. Appl. Phycol., 3, 61-81.

Estonian Maritime Administration. 2001. Soela Strait to Vaike Strait [1 : 100 000]. In Charts of Estonia. Vol. 2. Vainameri (West-Estonian Archipelago): From Osmussaar to Saaremaa, p. 10. Tallinn.

Greenwell, M., Bird, C. J. & McLachlan, J. 1984. Depth-related variation in gross chemical composition of several seaweeds. Aquat. Bot., 20, 297-305.

Kersen, P. 2005. Kassari lahe toonduslikult kasutatav punavetikakooslus: varude hindamine ja prognoos. Keskkonnatehnika, 7, 20-23.

Kersen, P. & Martin, G. 2005. Preliminary assessment of natural losses in loose-lying red algal community through beach-cast macroalgae accumulation in the area of Kassari Bay (NE Baltic Sea). In Book of Abstracts. "The Baltic Sea--changing ecosystem" 5th BSSC, Sopot, Poland 20.24 June 2005, 264.

Kukk, H. & Rosenberg, T. (eds) 1985. Toonduslike vetikavarude olukorrast ENSV rannikumeres ja 1986. aasta limiit. Laanemere Kalamajanduse TUI, Tallinn. Manuscript.

Kull, A. 1999. Eesti tuule kliima. Publ. Inst. Geogr. Univ. Tartu., 85, 86-93.

Leht, M. (ed.) 1999. Eesti taimede maaraja. Eesti Loodusfoto, Tartu.

McLachlan, J., Greenwell, M., Bird, C. J. & Holmsgaard, J. E. 1987. Standing stocks of seaweeds of commercial importance on the north shore of Prince Edward Island, Canada. Bot. Mar., 30, 277-289.

Mardiste, H. 1970. Vainameri. In Laane-Eesti rannikualade loodus (Kumari, E., ed.), pp. 7-16. Loodusuurijate Selts ENSV TA juures, Valgus, Tallinn.

Mardiste, H. 1974. Kassari lahe hudroloogilisest re.iimist. In Eesti Geograafia Seltsi aastaraamat 1973 (Merikalju, L., ed.), pp. 91.102. Valgus, Tallinn.

Martin, G., Paalme, T. & Kukk, H. 1996. Long-term dynamics of the commercially useable Furcellaria lumbricalis-Coccotylus truncatus community in Kassari Bay, West Estonian Archipelago, the Baltic Sea. In Proc. Polish-Swedish Symposium on Baltic Coastal Fisheries: Resources and Management, pp. 121.129. Sea Fisheries Institute, Gdynia.

Martin, G., Paalme, T. & Torn, K. 2006a. Growth and production rates of the loose-lying and attached forms of the red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis and Coccotylus truncatus in Kassari Bay, the West Estonian Archipelago Sea. Hydrobiologia, 554, 107-115.

Martin, G., Paalme, T. & Torn, K. 2006b. Seasonality pattern of biomass accumulation in drifting Furcellaria lumbricalis community in waters of the West Estonian Archipelago, Baltic Sea. J. Appl. Phycol., 18, 557-563.

Nielsen, R., Kristiansen, A., Mathiesen, L. & Mathiesen, H. (eds) 1995. Distributional index of the benthic macroalgae of the Baltic Sea area. Acta Bot. Fenn., 155, 1-51.

Orr, M., Zimmer, M., Jelinski, D. E. & Mews, M. 2005. Wrack deposition on different beach types: spatial and temporal variation in the pattern of subsidy. Ecology, 86, 1496-1507.

Orviku, K. 1993. Contemporary coasts. In Geology of the Estonian Shelf (Luts, J. & Raukas, A., eds), pp. 29-39. Estonian Geological Society, Tallinn.

Piriz, M. L., Eyras, M. C. & Rostagno, C. M. 2003. Changes in biomass and botanical composition of beach-cast seaweeds in a disturbed coastal area from Argentine Patagonia. J. Appl. Phycol., 15(1), 67-74.

Raudsepp, U. & Kouts, T. 2001. Observations of near-bottom currents in the Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea. Aquat. Sci., 63, 385-405.

Sharp, G. J., Tetu, C., Semple, R. & Jones, D. 1993. Recent changes in the seaweed community of western Prince Edward Island: implications for the seaweed industry. Hydrobiologia, 260/261, 292-296.

StatSoft, Inc. 2006. Electronic Statistics Textbook. StatSoft, Tulsa, OK. WEB: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html

Suursaar, U., Otsmann, M. & Kullas, T. 2000. Exchange processes in the Vaike Strait (Baltic Sea): present, past, future. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol., 49, 235-252.

Suursaar, U., Kullas, T. & Otsmann, M. 2001. The influence of current and waves on ecological conditions of the Vainameri. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol., 50, 231-247.

Trei, T. 1965. Materjale Vainamere pohjataimestiku ja toonduslike punavetikate kasutamise voimaluste kohta. Eesti NSV TA Toim. Biol., 14, 180-196.

Trei, T. 1968. Toonduslike vetikate kasutamisest ja uurimisest. Abiks Kalurile, 1(46), 22-24.

Trei, T. 1991. Taimed Laanemere pohjal. Valgus, Tallinn.

Truus, K., Vaher, M., Kukk, H., Pehk, T. & Kollist, A. 1996. Laanemere punavetikate geelistuvad galaktaanid. Eesti TA Toim. Keemia, 45, 15-29.

Tuvikene, R., Truus, K., Vaher, M., Kailas, T., Martin, G. & Kersen, P. 2006. Extraction and quantification of hybrid carrageenans from the biomass of the red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis and Coccotylus truncatus. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Chem., 55, 40-53.

Wenberg, T. & Thomsen, M. S. 2005. The effect of wave exposure on the morphology of Eclonia radiata. Aquat. Bot., 85, 61-70.

Priit Kersen (a,b)* and Georg Martin (a) (a) Estonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Maealuse 10a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia (b) Department of Natural Sciences, Tallinn University, Narva mnt. 25, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia

* Corresponding author, pkersen@ut.ee
Table 1. Variables used in regression analysis to calculate wrack
accumulation over the whole Kassari Bay area

                        * Avg.        * Sum of        * Avg.
                      significant    significant       wind
                     wind velocity      wind        velocity,
Period        Site   m [s.sup.-1]    velocities    m [s.sup.-1]

28.02-21.04    T1         6.3           146.0           3.8
               T2         6.1           207.0           3.8
               T3         6.1           190.0           3.9

22.04-23.05    T1         7.2           137.0           4.7
               T2         7.2           137.0           4.4
               T3         7.3           132.0           4.6
24.05-21.06    T1         6.0           127.0           3.9
               T2         6.0           132.0           3.7
               T3         6.1           109.0           3.9

22.06-21.07    T1         5.7            57.0           3.6
               T2         5.7            57.0           3.5
               T3         5.5            44.0           3.5

22.07-22.08    T1         5.7            34.0           3.1
               T2         5.4            54.0           3.2
               T3         5.4            54.0           3.3

23.08-17.09    T1         5.9            88.0           3.9
               T2         5.9            88.0           3.7
               T3         5.9            71.0           3.9

18.09-5.11     T1         6.1           194.0           4.3
               T2         6.0           254.0           4.0
               T3         6.1           237.0           4.0

                       Distance        Wave
                        of 5 m      exposure,
Period        Site   isobath, km       deg

28.02-21.04    T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0

22.04-23.05    T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0
24.05-21.06    T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0

22.06-21.07    T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0

22.07-22.08    T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0

23.08-17.09    T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0

18.09-5.11     T1        1.6           52.0
               T2        0.7          127.0
               T3        0.5           94.0

                       F. lumbricalis        C. truncatus
                     BM, g [m.sup.-1],    BM, g [m.sup.-1],
Period        Site          dry                  dry

28.02-21.04    T1          1 133.9                  0.0
               T2            891.4                 18.9
               T3         36 775.1             26 944.0

22.04-23.05    T1            795.8                  0.0
               T2              0.0                  0.0
               T3              8.7                  6.9
24.05-21.06    T1            634.0                 12.0
               T2              0.0                  0.0
               T3             55.0                 13.2

22.06-21.07    T1             93.7                  0.0
               T2              0.0                  0.0
               T3              0.0                  0.0

22.07-22.08    T1              0.0                  0.0
               T2              0.0                  0.0
               T3              0.0                  0.0

23.08-17.09    T1              0.0                  0.0
               T2              0.0                  0.0
               T3              0.0                  0.0

18.09-5.11     T1              0.0                  0.0
               T2          1 226.9                214.0
               T3          2 676.1              1 779.1

* In Virtsu station, measured by EMHI. BM, biomass.

Table 2. Wrack sampling data at the three study sites
(T1, T2, and T3) on the NE coast of Saaremaa Island

                                    Avg.          Avg.
                                    width      thickness
                       Section    of ridge,    of ridge,
Date       Location   length, m       m            m

21.04.02      T1        62.3         4.6         0.26
              T2        49.5         1.1         0.25
              T3        51.4        15.1         0.34
23.05.02      T1        49          15.5         0.02
              T2        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3        51.4         0.45        0.01
21.06.02      T1                     0.2
              T2        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3                     0.15
21.07.02      T1        57.7         3.9         0.04
              T2        49.5         0.125       0.015
              T3        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
22.08.02      T1        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
17.09.02      T1        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
05.11.02      T1        Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2        67           3.2         0.14
              T3        66           4.3         0.1

                         Biomass
                         sampling

                                  Thickness,
Date       Location   Replicate       m

21.04.02      T1          1          0.13
                          2          0.12
                          3          0.08
              T2          1          0.1
                          2          0.05
                          3          0.11
              T3          1          0.1
                          2          0.09
                          3          0.12
23.05.02      T1          1          0.02
                          2          0.02
                          3          0.02
              T2      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3          1          0.01
                          2          0.01
                          3          0.01
21.06.02      T1          1
                          2
                          3
              T2      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3          1
                          2
                          3
21.07.02      T1          1          0.02
                          2          0.035
                          3          0.03
              T2          1          0.015
                          2          0.015
                          3          0.015
              T3      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
22.08.02      T1      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
17.09.02      T1      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
05.11.02      T1      Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2          1          0.25
                          2          0.13
                          3          0.02
              T3          1          0.05
                          2          0.06
3 0.08

                         Biomass of sample, g, dry

                      Furcellaria   Coccotylus
Date       Location   lumbricalis    truncatus      Total

21.04.02      T1          5.56          0          145.04
                          5.05          0          106.01
                          2.77          0          107.20
              T2         18.85          0.27       128.51
                         26.39          0.30        93.40
                         17.61          0.77       112.47
              T3         49.85         32.52       121.36
                         51.25         41.71       124.34
                         46.91         34.22       124.81
23.05.02      T1          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
                          1.09          0           44.52
                          0.97          0           43.04
              T2          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3          0.46          0.57        22.37
                          1.06          0.78        29.59
                          0.8           0.50        26.82
21.06.02      T1          2.84          0.11        70.05
                          2.35          0           68.60
                         12.11          0.23       201.07
              T2          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3          0.47          0.09        15.30
                          0.08          0.06        14.14
                          0.95          0.22        38.51
21.07.02      T1          1.14          0           71.35
                          0.6           0          104.73
                          0.4           0          113.08
              T2          0.04          0           13.36
                          0.06          0           31.02
                          0.33          0           86.97
              T3          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
22.08.02      T1          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
17.09.02      T1          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T3          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
05.11.02      T1          Furcellaria lumbricalis absent
              T2         32.44          5.47       206.27
                          8.33          1.10        86.56
                          1.78          0.64        13.92
              T3          6.58          6.00        31.85
                         11.74          8.28        40.79
                         42.75         26.33       140.01

Table 3. List of the macrobenthic species occurring in the observed
wrack in 2002 on the NE coast of Saaremaa Island

Species                           Recording level

RHODOPHYTA
  Ceramium spp.                  V       P
  Coccotylus truncatus                   P       B
  Furcellaria lumbricalis        V       P       B
  Polysiphonia fucoides                  P
  Rhodomela confervoides                 P
PHAEOPHYCEAE
  Fucus vesiculosus              V       P
  Pylaiella littoralis                   P
CHLOROPHYTA
  Cladophora glomerata           V       P
  Ulva intestinalis                      P
CHAROPHYTA
  Chara aspera                   V       P
MAGNOLIOPHYTA
  Myriophyllum spicatum          V       P
  Potamogeton sp.                V       P
  Ruppia maritima                        P
  Zostera marina                 V       P
GASTROPODA
  Hydrobia sp.                   V
BIVALVIA
  Mytilus trossulus              V
  Macoma balthica                V

V, recorded in wrack (by observation).

P, recorded in biomass samples (by laboratory determination).

B, biomass accumulation calculated.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Estonian Academy Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Kersen, Priit; Martin, Georg
Publication:Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Biology/Ecology
Date:Dec 1, 2007
Words:4272
Previous Article:Distribution of the eelgrass Zostera marina L. in the coastal waters of Estonia, NE Baltic Sea/Meriheina Zostera marina L. levik Eesti rannikumeres.
Next Article:New records of the amphipods Chelicorophium curvispinum, Gammarus tigrinus, G. duebeni, and G. lacustris in the Estonian coastal sea/Kirpvahiliste...


Related Articles
Spatial distribution of macrofauna in a littoral zone with drifting macroalgae in the Neva estuary/Pohjaloomastiku levik Neeva estuaari kinnitumata...
Effect of abiotic environment on the distribution of the attached and drifting red algae Furcellaria lumbricalis in the Estonian coastal...
Long-term changes in a northern Baltic macrophyte community/Pohjataimestiku pikaajalised muutused Laanemere pohjaosas.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters