Printer Friendly

Angular Dependence of [eta] Photoproduction in Photon-Induced Reaction.

1. Introduction

The excitation spectrum of nucleons is important to understanding the nonperturbative behavior of the fundamental theory of strong interactions, Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) [1-4]. The photon-induced meson production off nucleons is mainly used to achieve more information from the excitation spectrum of nucleons. It is very important for missing resonances that the [eta] meson production in photon-induced and hadron-induced reactions on free (and quasi-free) nucleons and on nuclei [5-8]. The advantage of photon-induced reactions is that the electromagnetic couplings can provide valuable information related to the details of the model wave functions. Because the electromagnetic excitations are isospin dependent, we need perform meson-production reactions off the neutron.

Recently, the photoproduction of [eta] mesons from quasi-free protons and neutrons was measured in [eta] [right arrow] 3[[pi].sup.0] [right arrow] 6[gamma] decay mode by the CBELSA/TAPS detector at the electron accelerator ELSA in Bonn [9]. At different incident photon energies, the experiments are performed by the incident photon beam on a liquid deuterium target. A great number of [eta] mesons are produced in the photon-induced reaction. The experimental data are regarded as a multiparticle system. And, their angular distributions represent an obvious regularity at different incident photon energies. In order to explain the abundant experimental results, some statistical methods are proposed and developed [10-16]. In this work, we will extend a multi-source thermal model to the statistical investigation of the angular distributions in the photon-induced reaction and try to understand the [eta] photoproduction in the reaction. In our previous wok [17-21], the model was focused on the investigation of the particle production in intermediate-energy and high-energy collisions.

2. [eta] Meson Distribution in the Multi-Source Thermal Model

In the multi-source thermal model [17-21], many emission sources are expected to be formed at the final stage of the photon-induced reaction. Every source emits particles isotropically in the source rest frame. The observed [eta] mesons are from different emission sources. The incident beam direction is defined as an oz axis and the reaction plane is defined as yoz plane. In the source rest frame, the meson momentum [p.sub.x], [p.sub.y], and [p.sub.z] obeys a normal distribution. The corresponding transverse momentum [p.sub.T] = [square root of ([p.sup.2.sub.x] + [p.sup.2.sub.y])] obeys a Rayleigh distribution:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (1)

where [sigma] represents a distribution width. The distribution function of the polar angle [theta] is

[f.sub.[theta]] ([theta]) = [1/2] sin [theta] (2)

Because of the interactions with other emission sources, the considered source deforms and translates along the oz axis. Then, the momentum component is revised to

[p'.sub.z] = [a.sub.z][p.sub.z] + [b.sub.z][sigma] (3)

where [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] represent the coefficients of the source deformation and translation along the oz axis, respectively. The mathematical description of the deformable translational source is formulized simply as a linear relationship between [p'.sub.z] and [p.sub.z], which reflects the mean result of the source interaction. For [a.sub.z] [not equal to] 1 or [b.sub.z] [not equal to] 0, the [p'.sub.z] distribution of [eta] mesons is anisotropic along the oz axis.

By using Monte Carlo method, [p.sub.T] and [p'.sub.z] are given by

[p.sub.T] = [sigma] [square root of (-2 ln [r.sub.1])], (4)

[p'.sub.z] = [a.sub.z][sigma] [square root of (-2 ln [r.sub.2])] cos (2[pi][r.sup.3]) + [b.sub.z][sigma], (5)

where [r.sub.1], [r.sub.2], and [r.sub.3] are random numbers from 0 to 1. The polar angle [theta] is revised to

[theta]' = arctan [[p.sub.T]/p'z] = arctan [[square root of (-2 ln [r.sub.1])]/ [a.sub.z] [square root of (-2 ln [r.sub.2])] cos (2[pi][r.sub.3]) + [b.sub.z]]. (6)

We can calculate a new distribution function of the polar angle by this formula.

3. Angular Dependencies of [eta] Photoproduction in the Photon-Induced Reaction

Figures 1(a)-1(p) show the angular distributions of [eta] mesons for different bins of incident photon energy 698 MeV [less than or equal to] [E.sub.[gamma]] [less than or equal to] 1005 MeV as a function of cos [[theta].sub.[eta]]. [[theta].sub.[eta]] is the polar angle of [eta] meson in the beam-target cm system assuming the initial state nucleon at rest. The symbols represent the experimental data from the CBELSA/TAPS detector at the electron accelerator ELSA in Bonn [9]. The results obtained by using the multi-source thermal model are shown with the curves, which behave in the same way as the experimental data in the 16 bins of incident photon energy. By minimizing [chi square] per degree of freedom ([chi square]/dof), we determine the corresponding parameters [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z], which are presented in Table 1. It is found that there is an almost linear relationship between the [b.sub.z] and [E.sub.[gamma]]. As representative energies of Figure 1, we give a schematic sketch of these emission sources at the four different energies in Figure 7(a). The deformations and translations can be seen intuitively in the figure.

In Figures 2(a)-2(p) and Figures 3(a)-3(p), we present the angular distributions of [eta] mesons for different bins of incident photon energy 1035 MeV [less than or equal to] [E.sub.[gamma]] [less than or equal to] 1835 MeV as a function of cos [[theta].sub.[eta]]. [[theta].sub.[eta]] is the polar angle of [eta] meson in the beam-target cm system assuming the initial state nucleon at rest. Same as Figure 1, the symbols represent the experimental data from the CBELSA/TAPS detector at the electron accelerator ELSA in Bonn [9]. The results obtained by using the multisource thermal model are shown with the curves, which behave in the same way as the experimental data in the 28 bins of incident photon energy. Parameters [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] are presented in Tables 2 and 3. As the representative energies of Figures 1 and 2, the schematic sketches of the emission sources are given at different energies in Figures 7(b) and 7(c).

In Figures 4, 5, and 6, we show angular distributions in the [eta]-nucleon cm system for [gamma]p [right arrow] p[eta] reaction for the different bins of final state energy 1488 MeV [less than or equal to] W [less than or equal to] 1625 MeV, 1635 MeV [less than or equal to] W [less than or equal to] 1830 MeV and 1850 MeV [less than or equal to] W [less than or equal to] 2070 MeV, respectively. Same as Figure 1, the model results and experimental data are indicated by the curves and symbols, respectively. The model results can also agree with the experimental data. In the same way, the deformations and translations of these emission sources are given in Tables 4-6 and Figures 7(d)-7(f). All the parameter values taken in the above calculations are also given in Figures 8 and 9. It can be found that [a.sub.z] keeps almost invariable and fluctuates around 1.0 with the increasing [E.sub.[gamma]]. The parameter [b.sub.z] increases linearly with the increasing [E.sub.[gamma]] and their relationship can be expressed by a linearly function, [b.sub.z] = (0.541 [+ or -] 0.005) x [10.sup.-3][E.sub.[gamma]] - (0.622 [+ or -] 0.011). There are similar relationships between the parameters and different final state energies W in Figure 9, where the fitting function of [b.sub.z] is [b.sub.z] = (0.808 [+ or -] 0.003) x [10.sup.-3]W - (1.322 [+ or -] 0.007).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The excitation spectrum of nucleons can especially help us to understand the strong interaction in the nonperturbative regime. Before, the hadron induced reactions is a main experimental method in the investigation. In the last two decades, the photon-induced reaction and electron scattering experiment are applied to study the electromagnetic excitation of baryons. Recently, the photoproduction of [eta] mesons from quasi-free protons and neutrons are measured by the CBELSA/TAPS detector. In the paper, we theoretically study the angular distribution of [eta] mesons for different incident photon energies [E.sub.[gamma]] and for different final state energies W. Then, the results are compared with the experimental data in detail. The deformation coefficient [a.sub.z] and translation coefficient [b.sub.z] are extracted by the comparison. [a.sub.z] is almost independent of incident photon energies and final state energies. [b.sub.z] is linearly dependent on incident photon energies and final state energies. In particular, we visually give the deformation and translation of the emission sources by schematic sketches. From the patterns, it is intuitive and easy to better understand the motion and configuration of the emission sources.

A great number of [eta] mesons are produced in the photon-induced reaction. These [eta] mesons are regarded as a multiparticle system, which can be analyzed by the statistical method. In recent years, we develop such a model, which is called multisource thermal model. Some emission sources of final-state particles are formed in the reaction. Each emission source emits particles isotropically in the rest frame of the emission source. Due to the source interaction, the sources emit particles anisotropically. The [eta] mesons are emitted from these sources. In our previous work, the model can successfully describe transverse momentum spectra and pseudorapidity spectra of final-state particles produced in proton-proton (pp) collisions, proton-nucleus (pA) collisions, and nucleus -nucleus (AA) collisions at intermediate energy and at high energy [17-21]. In this work, we extend the multisource thermal model to the statistical investigation of final-state particles produced in the photon-induced reaction. The model is improved to describe the angular dependence of the [eta] photoproduction from quasi-free protons and neutrons. The information of the source deformation and translation is obtained with different beam energies. It is helpful for us to understand the [eta] photoproduction.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1260124

Data Availability

The theoretical results are compared with experimental data, which are from [9].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 11247250 and No. 11575103, Shanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 201701D121005, and Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (STIP) Grant No. 201802017.

References

[1] B. Krusche, C. Wilkin, and Prog. Part, "Production of [eta] and [eta]' mesons on nucleons and nuclei," Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 80, pp. 43-95, 2014.

[2] M. Dieterle, "First measurement of the polarization observable E and helicity-dependent cross sections in single [[pi].sup.0] photoproduction from quasi-free nucleons," Phys. Lett. B, vol. 770, no. 523, 2017.

[3] B. C. Li, Y. Y. Fu, L. L. Wang, and F.-H. Liu, "Dependence of elliptic flows on transverse momentum and number of participants in Au+Au collisions at [square root of ([s.sub.NN])]=200 GeV," Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 40, no. 2, Article ID 025104, 2013.

[4] T. Sekihara, H. Fujioka, and T. Ishikawa, "Possible [eta]'d bound state and its bound state and its s-channel formation in the [gamma]d [right arrow] [eta]d reaction," Physical Review C, vol. 97, Article ID 045202, 2018.

[5] A. V. Anisovich, "Neutron helicity amplitudes," Physical Review C, vol. 96, Article ID 055202, 2017.

[6] V. Kuznetsov, "Observation of Narrow [N.sup.+](1685) and [N.sup.o] Resonances in [sub.[gamma]]N [right arrow] [pi][eta]N Reactions," JETP Lett, vol. 106, no. 11, pp. 693-699, 2017.

[7] J. D. Holt, J. Menendez, J. Simonis, and A. Schwenk, "Three-nucleon forces and spectroscopy of neutron-rich calcium isotopes," Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 90, no. 2, Article ID 024312, 2014.

[8] S. A. Voloshin, "Collective phenomena in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions: anisotropic flow and more," Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 541-546, 2012.

[9] L. Witthauer, "Photoproduction of [eta] mesons from the neutron: Cross sections and double polarization observable E," The European Physical Journal A, vol. 53, no. 58, 2017.

[10] J. Rafelski and J. Letessier, "Testing limits of statistical hadronization," Nuclear Physics A, vol. 715, p. 98, 2003.

[11] A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, "Thermal hadron production in relativistic nuclear collisions: The hadron mass spectrum, the horn, and the QCD phase transition," Physics Letters B, vol. 673, no. 2, pp. 142-145, 2009.

[12] J. Cleymans, H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, and S. Wheaton, "Comparison of chemical freeze-out criteria in heavy-ion collisions," Physical Review C: Nuclear Physics, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 034905, 2006.

[13] P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel, and C. Wetterich, "Chemical freeze-out and the QCD phase transition temperature," Physics Letters B, vol. 596, no. 1-2, pp. 61-69, 2004.

[14] A. Adare, S. Afanasiev, and C. Aidala, "Measurement of neutral mesons in p+p collisions at [square root of (s)]=200 GeV and scaling properties of hadron production," Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 83, Article ID 052004, 2011.

[15] K. Aamodt, N. Abel, and U. Abeysekara, "Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in proton-proton collisions at [square root of (s)] = 900 GeV with ALICE at the LHC," Physics Letters B, vol. 693, no. 2, pp. 53-68, 2010.

[16] C. Y. Wong and G. Wilk, "Tsallis fits to [p.sub.T] spectra and multiple hard scattering in pp collisions at the LHC," Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 87, Article ID 114007, 2013.

[17] B. C. Li, Y. Y. Fu, E. Q. Wang, L. L. Wang, and F. H. Liu, "Transverse momentum dependence of charged and strange hadron elliptic flows in Cu-Cu collisions," Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 39, no. 8, Article ID 025009, 2012.

[18] S. Andringa, E. Arushanova, and S. Asahi, "Current status and future prospects of the SNO+ experiment," Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2016, Article ID 6194250, 21 pages, 2016.

[19] B.-C. Li, Y.-Z. Wang, F.-H. Liu, X.-J. Wen, and Y.-E. Dong, "Particle production in relativistic pp and AA collisions at RHIC and LHC energies with Tsallis statistics using the two-cylindrical multisource thermal model," Physical Review D: Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 89, Article ID 054014, 2014.

[20] B. C. Li, Y. Z. Wang, and F. H. Liu, "Formulation of transverse mass distributions in Au-Au collisions at [square root of (sNN)] = 200 GeV/nucleon," Physics Letters B, vol. 725, no. 4-5, pp. 352-356, 2013.

[21] B.-C. Li, Z. Zhang, J.-H. Kang, G.-X. Zhang, and F.-H. Liu, "Tsallis statistical interpretation of transverse momentum spectra in high-energy pA collisions," Advances in High Energy Physics, vol. 2015, Article ID 741816, 10 pages, 2015.

Jun-Zhen Wang and Bao-Chun Li (iD)

Department of Physics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Bao-Chun Li; libc2010@163.com

Received 23 April 2018; Accepted 13 September 2018; Published 30 September 2018

Guest Editor: Sakina Fakhraddin

Caption: Figure 1: Angular distributions for different bins of incident photon energy 698 MeV [less than or equal to] [E.sub.[gamma]] [less than or equal to] 1005 MeV as a function of cos [[theta].sub.[eta]] in the beam-target cm system assuming the initial state nucleon at rest. The symbols represent the experimental data from the CBELSA/TAPS detector at the electron accelerator ELSA in Bonn [9]. The results in the multi-source thermal model are shown with the curves.

Caption: Figure 2: Same as Figure 1, but showing angular distributions for different bins of incident photon energy 1035 MeV [less than or equal to] [E.sub.[gamma]] [less than or equal to] 1475 MeV.

Caption: Figure 3: Same as Figure 1, but showing angular distributions for different bins of incident photon energy 1505 MeV [less than or equal to] [E.sub.[gamma]] [less than or equal to] 1835 MeV.

Caption: Figure 4: Angular distributions in the [eta]-nucleon cm system for the reaction [gamma]p [right arrow] p[eta] for the different bins of final state energy 1488 MeV [less than or equal to] W [less than or equal to] 1625 MeV. The symbols represent the experimental data from the CBELSA/TAPS detector at the electron accelerator ELSA in Bonn [9]. The results in the multisource thermal model are shown with the curves.

Caption: Figure 5: Same as Figure 4, but showing angular distributions for the different bins of final state energy 1635 MeV [less than or equal to] W [less than or equal to] 1830 MeV.

Caption: Figure 6: Same as Figure 4, but showing angular distributions for the different bins of final state energy 1850 MeV [less than or equal to] W [less than or equal to] 2070 MeV.

Caption: Figure 7: The deformable and translational source in the reaction plane for different bins of incident photon energy [E.sub.[gamma]] or final state energy W.

Caption: Figure 8: [a.sub.Z] and [b.sub.Z] for different bins of incident photon energy [E.sub.[gamma]]. The symbols are the values taken in Figures 1-3. The straight line is a fitted curve.

Caption: Figure 9: The [a.sub.Z] and [b.sub.Z] values taken for different bins of final state energy W. The symbols are the values taken in Figures 4-6. The straight line is a fitted curve.
Table 1: Values of [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] taken in Figure 1 model
results.

            [E.sub.[gamma]]
Figure 1         (MeV)        [a.sub.z]    [b.sub.z]   [chi square]/dof

(a)               698           1.050       -0.170           0.118
(b)               712           1.020       -0.210           0.105
(c)               730           1.050       -0.170           0.090
(d)               750           1.040       -0.155           0.134
(e)               770           0.985       -0.105           0.182
(f)               790           0.970       -0.125           0.179
(g)               810           0.979       -0.110           0.194
(h)               830           0.960       -0.120           0.192
(i)               850           0.970       -0.110           0.200
(j)               870           0.980       -0.130           0.211
(k)               890           0.950       -0.120           0.175
(l)               910           0.970       -0.140           0.261
(m)               930           0.940       -0.110           0.179
(n)               955           0.950       -0.120           0.154
(o)               980           0.950       -0.090           0.138
(p)              1005           0.920       -0.110           0.150

Table 2: Values of [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] taken in Figure 2 model
results.

           [E.sub.[gamma]]
Figure 2        (MeV)        [a.sub.z]   [b.sub.z]   [chi square]/dof

(a)             1035           0.920      -0.080          0.124
(b)             1065           0.940      -0.090          0.118
(c)             1095           0.970      -0.030          0.132
(d)             1125           0.870       0.030          0.165
(e)             1155           0.850       0.050          0.170
(f)             1185           0.850       0.030          0.168
(g)             1215           0.860       0.070          0.173
(h)             1245           0.860       0.050          0.122
(i)             1270           0.850       0.110          0.121
(j)             1295           0.830       0.150          0.145
(k)             1325           0.910       0.120          0.147
(l)             1355           0.910       0.160          0.142
(m)             1385           0.890       0.110          0.115
(n)             1415           0.930       0.130          0.106
(o)             1445           0.830       0.250          0.122
(p)             1475           0.810       0.210          0.091

Table 3: Values of [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] taken in Figure 3 model
results.

           [E.sub.[gamma]]
Figure 3        (MeV)       [a.sub.z]   [b.sub.z]   [chi square]/dof

(a)             1505          0.915       0.260          0.243
(b)             1535          0.920       0.260          0.190
(c)             1565          0.920       0.240          0.158
(d)             1595          0.800       0.360          0.315
(e)             1625          0.890       0.310          0.179
(f)             1655          0.930       0.340          0.190
(g)             1685          0.910       0.360          0.206
(h)             1715          0.940       0.400          0.235
(i)             1745          0.960       0.460          0.085
(j)             1775          0.960       0.410          0.144
(k)             1805          1.090       0.400          0.132
(l)             1835          1.060       0.390          0.140

Table 4: Values of [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] taken in Figure 4 model
results.

Figure 4   W(MeV)   [a.sub.z]   [b.sub.z]   [chi square]/dof

(a)         1488      0.956      -0.098           0.086
(b)         1492      0.968      -0.069           0.125
(c)         1498      0.966      -0.058           0.101
(d)         1505      0.959      -0.063           0.114
(e)         1515      0.965      -0.052           0.205
(f)         1525      0.952      -0.048           0.192
(g)         1535      0.960      -0.063           0.143
(h)         1545      0.967      -0.066           0.206
(i)         1555      0.948      -0.060           0.174
(j)         1565      0.941      -0.072           0.168
(k)         1575      0.934      -0.059           0.170
(l)         1585      0.955      -0.068           0.235
(m)         1595      0.925      -0.051           0.260
(n)         1605      0.934      -0.039           0.251
(o)         1615      0.942      -0.045           0.307
(p)         1625      0.961      -0.058           0.293

Table 5: Values of [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] taken in Figure 5 model
results.

Figure 5   W(MeV)   [a.sub.z]   [b.sub.z]   [chi square]/dof

(a)        1635       0.958      -0.042           0.305
(b)        1645       0.940      -0.028           0.350
(c)        1655       0.920      -0.021           0.263
(d)        1670       0.925      -0.009           0.187
(e)        1690       0.902       0.022           0.240
(f)        1710       0.899       0.047           0.209
(g)        1730       0.868       0.095           0.181
(h)        1750       0.843       0.102           0.194
(i)        1770       0.853       0.115           0.235
(j)        1790       0.879       0.125           0.170
(k)        1810       0.855       0.142           0.152
(l)        1830       0.867       0.159           0.138

Table 6: Values of [a.sub.z] and [b.sub.z] taken in Figure 6 model
results.

Figure 6   W(MeV)   [a.sub.z]   [b.sub.z]   [chi square]/dof

(a)        1850       0.881       0.168           0.127
(b)        1870       0.872       0.221           0.132
(c)        1890       0.883       0.241           0.135
(d)        1910       0.856       0.252           0.153
(e)        1930       0.867       0.269           0.218
(f)        1950       0.853       0.253           0.295
(g)        1970       0.860       0.249           0.321
(h)        1990       0.875       0.261           0.184
(i)        2010       0.895       0.278           0.359
(j)        2030       0.906       0.299           0.337
(k)        2050       0.932       0.348           0.285
(l)        2070       0.945       0.337           0.304
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Wang, Jun-Zhen; Li, Bao-Chun
Publication:Advances in High Energy Physics
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Words:3779
Previous Article:A Cylindrically Symmetric and Static Anisotropic Fluid Spacetime and the Naked Singularity.
Next Article:Discussion of a Possible Corrected Black Hole Entropy.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |