Printer Friendly

Analytic expressions for interface terms in general dispersed two-phase flow laden with arbitrary-shaped dispersed elements.

1 Introduction

In the theoretical deduction of Two-phase flow equations, extensive use has been made of volume, temporal or ensemble averages and double/mixed averaging operators. Besides, conditioned averaging formalisms based on a phase indicator function, I, and Reynolds transport theorem are widely found in Two-phase Flow literature [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6].

Despite the consolidation of some of the above mentioned approaches, the appropriate theoretical technique to generate useful exact continuous phase Eulerian equations to deal with general Two-Phase Flow is nowadays far from being a closed subject. In fact, a lot of work has been done on developing semi-empirical formulations for engineering purposes.

It is well known that for any systematic conditioned averaging procedure the mean value of any scalar derivative appearing in an instantaneous Eulerian equation is transformed into a derivative of the scalar averaged mean value, plus an extra interface source term. This term introduces information about the presence of the other phase into the equations.

In Lundgren (1972) and Hercynski & Pienkowska (1980) [1, 4] a promising alternative point of view is found following the usual conditioning technique based on a phase indicator function and properly defining a simple probability density function (PDF) for a suspension of spherical solid particles. Within the context of PDF-indicator function, Prosperetti & Zhang (1994) [7] have developed another kind of PDF approach for spheres in a hydrodynamic potential flow and obtained Eulerian transport equations in the framework of the two-fluid engineering modelling with application to bubbly flows. However, the extension of the conditioning average procedure for disperse elements other than spherical ones in general flows was not a trivial task. In Aliod & Dopazo (1990) [8] and La[acute accent]in & Aliod (2000) [9] the main relationships for arbitrary shaped particles was immediately applied to establish a k - [member of] extended model for gas-solid turbulent two-phase jet flows. Nevertheless, up to now no detailed foundation or proof of these essential relationships and related properties has been available in the literature. The detailed presentation of the derivation of the fundamental relationships of conditioned average for Two-Phase Flow laden with discrete elements of arbitrary size and shape, which can be applied to any laminar of turbulent flow, constitutes the objective of this paper. Additionally, in order to illustrate the capabilities of the introduced approach, the essential relationships are employed to present a detailed derivation of the statistically averaged exact continuity and momentum equations for Two-Phase Flow, including examples of closure of interaction terms.

2 Description of the Two-Phase system

The disperse phase is treated as a cloud of N different material elements, [[sigma].sup.j], identified by index, j = 1, ...,N, each of them with a volume [] and limited by a closed surface [S.sup.j] that defines the interface (Fig. 1). [y.sup.j] will denote the [[sigma].sup.j] position, defined, for instance, by its geometrical center


Each disperse element dynamic and geometrical configuration will be characterized by a set of variables, denoted by [z.sup.j], which will describe the shape, size and thermo-mechanical state (e.g., velocity [v.sup.j], temperature [T.sup.j], density [[rho]], etc.) of [[sigma].sup.j] located at [y.sup.j].


Even for small values of N it is neither possible nor necessary to describe the element dynamics in a deterministic way. Consequently, a probability density function (PDF) denoted by [P.sup.N] (t, [y.sup.1], [z.sup.1], [y.sup.2], [z.sup.2], ..., [y.sup.N], [z.sup.N]) is introduced, which represents the probability of having, at instant t, the s1 element located around point [y.sup.1], with state [z.sup.1] while the s2 element is around [y.sup.2] with state [z.sup.2], ..., and so on. For the sake of simplicity the following notation is adopted:

{[C.sup.N]} = {[Y.sup.N],[Z.sup.N]} = {[y.sup.1], [z.sup.1], [y.sup.2], [z.sup.2], ..., [y.sup.N], [z.sup.N]}, [P.sup.N] (t,[C.sup.N]) = [P.sup.N] (t,[Y.sup.N],[Z.sup.N]).

The [P.sup.N] particle indifference principle, or full [P.sup.N] symmetry, is a well known and essential property of any discrete elements distribution that will be assumed. It stands that the interchange of position (y), shape and dynamic states (z) between whatever two disperse elements i, j provides the same value for the [P.sup.N] function. Therefore, if Cj = {[y.sup.j] , [z.sup.j]}, this symmetry property means

[P.sup.N](t,[C.sup.1], ...,[C.sup.i], ...,[C.sup.j], ...,[C.sup.N]) = [P.sup.N](t,[C.sup.1], ...,[C.sup.j] , ...,[C.sup.i], ...,[C.sup.N]).

In order to apply the conditioning formalism, phase indicator functions for the continous phase, I, and the disperse phase, Id, are defined in terms of the Heaviside function [H.sup.j]([S.sup.j]):

[I.sup.d](x, t,[C.sup.N]) = [N.summation over (j=1)] [1 - [H.sup.j] Sj)], I(x, t,[C.sup.N]) = 1 - [I.sup.d](x, t,[C.sup.N]),

where [H.sup.j]([S.sup.j]), equals 1 if (x, t) is in the continuous phase ([S.sup.j] > 0) and equal 0 otherwise.

The average value of any flow quantity [phi](x, t,[C.sup.N]) is defined as


3 Conditional average derivatives

Due to the discontinuity of I in the interfaces, the conmutativity between the conditioned averaging and derivative operators is lost. This is an essential feature because, when conditioning continuous phase instantaneous equations (i.e., Navier-Stokes-Fourier equations), the conditioned average of spatial and time derivatives systematically appears. Therefore, it is necessary to find an expression for the derivative of the conditional average of the generic variable f. It is not difficult to show that

([alpha][bar.phi]]),[lambda] = <I[phi]> ,[lambda] = <(I[phi]),[lambda]> = <I [phi],[lambda]> + <I,[sub.[lambda]] [phi]>, (2)

where a is the continuous phase void fraction, [alpha] = &lt;I&gt;, [bar.[phi]] = <[phi]/I = 1>, is the conditioned average of f to the presence of continuous phase and [lambda] subscript after a comma denotes either spatial or time derivatives. The expression (2) shows that the derivative of the conditioned average of f, left hand side (LHS), is split in two parts, right hand side (RHS): the first one is the conditioned average of the derivative of f, and the second, named interaction term, includes the contribution of the interfaces of dispersed elements and is related to the derivatives of the indicator function.

The derivative of I, in the sense of distributions, can be computed in terms of the derivatives of the Heaviside step function as

I,[sub.[lambda]] = [N.summation over (j=1)] [dH.sup.j]/[dS.sup.j] [S.sup.j],[lambda] = [N.summation over (j=1)][[delta].sup.j]([S.sup.j])[S.sup.j] ,[lambda], (3)

where [delta](S) is the Dirac's delta whose value is [infinity] when S = 0 (i.e., in the interface) and equals to zero anywhere else.

If [S.sup.j](x - [y.sup.j]) = 0 is the implicit equation of [[sigma].sup.j] interface, its derivatives can be computed as


Then, from (3), (4) and average definition (1)


where as represents the expected value of having interface at (x, t)


P* is the reduced probability function of one particule obtained by integration on the other N-1 particles configuration. In the second equality of (6) the [P.sup.N] particle indifference principle has been applied, resulting in the equivalence of all the addends under the summatory symbol.

Nevertheless, in spite of the straightforward deduction of the formulae (5), this presentation lacks direct physical interpretation and useful properties for disperse Two-Phase Flow practical modelling. Neither the expected value of interface presence, as, nor the apparently spurious factor [absolute value of [nabla][sub.x]S] are evident and measurable properties of the flow.

4 Interaction term general expression

Expression (5) can be integrated firstly on the disperse element position variables keeping the rest of the dynamic variables and other particles frozen


[[delta].sup.j] ([S.sup.j]) only captures events in which some element, whose center is located at [y.sup.j] , presents part of its boundary [S.sup.j](x - [y.sup.j]) at x (see Fig. 2). For any function f(t,x, y), in the Appendix is shown that


where points [y.sub.s] verify S(x-[y.sub.s]) = 0 and [absolute value of [nabla][sub.x]S] y=[y.sub.s][not equal to] = 0 (i.e., [y.sub.s] are regular points on the surface S).


The volume integral of LHS of (8), capturing only disperse element center position y values making [S.sup.j](x-[y.sup.j]) = 0, is transformed into the RHS surface integral extended along a surface denoted by S' and called the homologous surface of S with reference to x. S' is defined by the set of points [y.sub.s] which have the property that, when locating the center of a given disperse element (whose boundary is S) at [y.sub.s], some part of the particle boundary passes by the fixed point x. Figure 2 illustrates the S' concept. A certain disperse element with state z is visualized for three different realizations over S', offering at the same point x different parts of its boundary. Other locations of disperse element center y apart from those located over S'([y.sub.s]) will not produce interface presence at x and will not contribute to (7) LHS integral.

In fact S' is obtained from S by making a symmetry of center (x - y)/2. Therefore, S and S' have identical local geometries for respective [y.sub.s], x points.

Applying (8) to (7), denoting [C.sup.j.sub.s] = {[y.sup.j.sub.s], [z.sup.j]}, it is possible to write


Integration on [C.sup.N-1] configuration and taking into account the [P.sup.N] particle indifference, it results


where [[phi].sub.s] = [phi](t,x, [y.sub.s], z) does only depend on its own disperse element parameters.

Due to the relationship between the geometries of S and S' (Fig. 3) it is not difficult to demonstrate that the quotient between both gradients appearing in (9) is just one. Therefore, the general expression for the interaction term is found


where x is fixed, [y.sub.s] [member of] S' and x' = x - [y.sub.s]. It is remarkable that for a given disperse element state z, the [[phi]n.sub.[lambda]] product depends only on relative vector position x' with respect to its geometrical centre, regardless of the absolute positions.


It should be stressed that (10) constitutes a quite general expression for the interaction term for multiphase disperse flows and no restrictions are required apart from the finite volume of the disperse elements. The physical meaning of the interaction term is straightforward. It tells us that the interaction term at one point x is just the statistical average of all interfacial fluxes of the f volumetric property, obtained in each realization in which any interface element is present at x. The statistical average is performed in two steps. Inner integral over S' represents the grouping of all those realizations for a frozen geometrical-dynamic state while the outer integral accounts for all possible states.

5 The case of small disperse discrete elements

In the case in which the dispersed elements are small enough, the interaction term (10) can be further simplified providing an equivalent expression with a clear interpretation and analitically fruitful for Two-Phase Flow modelling.

Let [l.sup.d] be the characteristic size of disperse elements and L be the characteristic length of the region where the disperse phase flow develops. If [l.sup.d] [much less than] L (a condition quite usual for disperse Two-Phase Flow) the interaction term (10) can be split in two terms

<I, [sub.[lambda]] [phi]> = [I.sub.[phi][lambda]] + [[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]], (11)

where [I.sub.[phi][lambda]] is called main contribution and [[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]] is named residue. Both are evaluated as:


[bar.[V.sup.d*] is the average disperse phase volume conditioned to the presence of the disperse phase centered at (x, t) and the integration surface, [S.sub.p], is the disperse element interface centered at x (see Fig. 4).


Moreover, if [I.sub.[phi][lambda]] is not identically null and


where [sigma]() denotes order of magnitude, the magnitude order of [[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]] is much smaller than the [I.sub.[phi][lambda]] one, [sigma]([[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]]) [much less than] [sigma]([I.sub.[phi][lambda]]). Hereafter, (11) and (12) will be derived starting from (10). The first objective is to transform (10) into an integral over the real disperse element surface [S.sub.p] centered at x instead of the mathematical S' surface. For this purpose, it should be noted first that if the [[sigma].sup.d] center is displaced from [y.sub.s] to the x point (Fig. 4), the relation x' = p-x will define some relative interfacial position and taking into account the geometrical similarity between [S.sub.p] and S', the integral on (10) over the homologous surface with reference to x can be written as an integral over the boundary of the disperse element [S.sub.p] centered at x


with [S.sub.p] = S(p - x) = 0 and da is the surface element on [S.sub.p].

If [l.sup.d] [much less than] L, P* can be expanded in Taylor series around x. To the first order

P*(t,x - x', z) = P*(t,x, z) - P*,[sub.i] (t,x, z)[x'.sub.i] + [sigma] ([([l.sup.d]/L).sup.2]).

[sigma]([([l.sup.d]/L).sup.2]) is a residue or order [([l.sup.d]/L).sup.2]. Thus, within this approximation order (14) can be evaluated as


In such a case, the first addend in (15) is expressed as


where N(x, t) = [integral] dzP*(t,x, z) is the local particle number density and the overbar followed by an asterisk denotes the average conditioned to the presence of disperse phase centered at (x, t).

In the second addend in (15) the derivative can be commuted with the integrals since there is no other dependence on x except in P*, which is also extracted from the surface integral


The next step is to calculate the particle number density N(t,x). In order to do this, the phase indicator function [I.sup.d] expectation value is evaluated as

[[alpha].sup.d] = <[I.sup.d]>(x, t) = 1/N! [integral] [dC.sup.N][P.sup.N](t,[C.sup.N]) [N.summation over (j=1)][1 - [H.sup.j]([S.sup.j](x - [y.sup.j])].

Applying the distributive property, integrating [C.sup.N-1] and taking into account the [P.sup.N] particle indifference again, the following is obtained


where the spatial integration domain of this expression is reduced to the set of points y producing the presence of disperse elements at (x, t). In the same way as the reasoning followed previously, this region is V ', the volume enclosed by the homologous surface S'.

Introducing again the first order expansion of P*(y) around x


But V ' is a symmetry of a [[sigma].sup.d] element with its center at x, so the second addend is null. Thus, to the first order


This result supplies a straightforward interpretation of the expectation value of the [I.sup.d] indicator function, [[alpha].sup.d]: it tells us that [[alpha].sup.d] is the average disperse elements' volume fraction and therefore the local particle number density is expressed as


which is accurate up to the first order.

To summarize, the expression of <I, [sub.[lambda]][phi]> estimated to the first order in the series expansion of P* around x is


With this result, (11) and (12) are proven.

To finish, it remains to demonstrate that if the main contribution is different from zero and condition (13) is satisfied, the order of magnitude or the residue [[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]] is much smaller than the order of magnitude of [I.sub.[phi][lambda]]. In order to show this, note that the order of magnitude of residue can be estimated as


Therefore, from (13) and (17)


consequently, as long as [l.sup.d] [much less than] L is satisfied, s ([[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]]) [much less than] s ([I.sub.[phi][lambda]]).

In general, the hypothesis ([l.sup.d] [much less than] L) and the condition (13) are frequently found in turbulent disperse Two-Phase Flow of industrial interest. As a consequence of the results stated in the previous section, provided that [I.sub.[phi][lambda]] [not equal to] 0, the interaction term can be approximated as


which constitutes the essential relation for conditioned statistical average. Presentation (18) is much more convenient than the first expression deduced for the interaction term, relation (10).

The interaction term appearing in (18) represents the statistical average of the net flux over the entire boundary of a single disperse element, [S.sub.p], per unit average volume, times the disperse phase void fraction. In the interaction term the net flux and the disperse phase volume statistical average values are computed as conditioned to particle centre presence at point x. The statistically averaged variables [alpha], [bar.[phi]] are truly local and time dependent. Moreover, volume filtering effects of small scales associated with conventional volume averages are absent.

Furthermore (18) resembles and is directly related to the relationships appearing in the context of volume average [10], but the present approach allows unnecesary complexities in the subsequent Two-Phase Flow modelling to be overcome because the introduction of complex space-time weighting functions or additional time averaging procedures is avoided.

An additional aspect to be emphasised is related to the possible subsequent analytical transformations of the interaction term at (18), because the [[phi]n.sub.[lambda]] flux extends over the closed surface defined by the disperse element boundary, [S.sub.p].

It must be noticed that the appearance of the residue contribution [[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]] in (16) is a consequence of the different values of [phi] P* in the neighbourhood of x. [phi] P* has been approximated by a linear expansion around x which is valid as far as [sigma] ([absolute value of x']/L) [approximately equal to] [l.sup.d]/L [much less than] 1. Therefore the residue is a contribution of order [sigma]([l.sup.d]/L) regarding to the main contribution.

In many contexts, such as the ones associated with Two-Phase Flow turbulent modelling, it may be accurate enough to retain only the main contribution to the interaction term as long as strong uncertainties, coming from the approximate closures of the several transport and interaction contributions involved, are clearly superior to residue contributions of order ([l.sup.d]/L).

It should be noted that (13) establishes that the order of magnitude of [x'.sub.i][phi] flux over the particle boundary can be approximated by the order of magnitude of total [phi] flux through the interface multiplied by a characteristic length of the particle size. Although condition (13) will generally be satisfied by arbitrary functions [phi] over regular or irregular particle shapes it should be emphasized that [[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]] should not be neglected without further considerations. For instance, when the main contribution exactly cancels, (i.e. [phi] or [[phi]n.sub.[lambda]] is strictly constant over [S.sub.p]) the interaction term reduces to the residue contribution, then, it should be kept or discarded in comparison with other flow terms. Moreover, theoretical limiting cases, where known exact analytical solutions are to be reconstructed or small correction terms are of interest, residue should be retained, otherwise inconsistencies or inaccurate results will appear.

6 Relevance for Two-Phase Flow modelling

Conditioned averaging to deduce continuous phase Eulerian equations in multiphase flows has been examined in detail in the literature. Nevertheless, in order to illustrate the most important characteristics of the present approach, we will derive the continuous phase continuity and momentum equations. Deduction of the general equations for continuous phase in Two-Phase Flow where relationship (18) applies can be achieved by the standard methodology used in the indicator function context.

The continuous phase instantaneous local Eulerian continuity, momentum equations are written down in a conservative presentation for convenience

[rho], [sub.t] + [[[rho]u.sub.i]], [sub.i] = 0 [[[rho]u.sub.j]], [sub.t] + [[[rho]u.sub.i][u.sub.j]], [sub.i] = [-p[[delta].sub.ij] + [[tau].sub.ij]], [sub.i] + [[rho]g.sub.j], (19)

[u.sub.i], p, [rho] and [[tau].sub.ij] are the instantaneous velocity, pressure, density and viscous stress tensor respectively.

Since the system (19) is not valid everywhere but only at points x, where at time t, a continuous phase exists, these events must be differentiated with the aid of the continuous phase indicator function.

Multiplying both equations on system (19) by I and taking the statistical average (1) afterwards

<I[rho], [sub.t]> + <I[[[rho]u.sub.i]],[sub.i]> = 0 <I [[[rho]u.sub.j]], [sub.t]> + <I [[[rho]u.sub.i][u.sub.j]],[sub.i]> = <I [-p[[delta].sub.ij] + [[tau].sub.ij]], [sub.i]> + <I[[rho]g.sub.j]>. (20)

In (20), all contributions, except volume force <I[[rho]g.sub.j]i, are conditioned averages of variable derivatives. The interaction terms in (20) for [rho]([u.sub.i] - [])[n.sub.i], [[rho]u.sub.j]([u.sub.i] - [])[n.sub.i] and [[tau].sub.ij][n.sub.j] are defined at the disperse phase, continuous through the interface and expressed according to (18) Therefore, by systematically applying the essential relation for conditioned statistical average (18), recalling the n# definition depending on the kind of derivative, spatial or temporal, and locating all interaction terms on the right hand side of the respective equation, continuity yields to


and momentum


The usual notation is assumed: [U.sub.i] = [bar.[u.sub.i]], P = [bar.p], [u'.sub.i] = [u.sub.i] - [U.sub.i]. [[member of].sub.I] and [[member of].sub.IM] are the residues associated to the entrainment terms in the continuity and momentum equations respectively, [[member of].sub.pj] corresponds to the pressure gradient and [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII.] to the stress tensor. Henceforth, for simplicity, [rho] constant will be assumed.

The combination of interaction terms coming from temporal and convective contributions in any conservative equation generate a characteristic source term, the entrainment term, associated with interfacial mass transfer phenomena. When there is no local mass transfer across the interface u = [v.sub.s], all the entrainment source terms become zero (main contribution and residue).

For a Navier-Stokes viscous stress tensor in an incompressible flow

[alpha][bar.[[tau].sub.ij]] = <I[mu] [[u.sub.i],j + [u.sub.j],i]>. (21)

Since the conditioned averaged viscous tensor (21) contains further spatial derivatives, essential relationship (18) should be carefully applied again. Assuming a constant dynamic viscosity coefficient, [mu]


The second term in the right hand side is the so called "extradeformation term" [3], related to the viscous stress tensor and due to average local deformation introduced by disperse element boundaries. Let's take a closer look to this term.

It is known that an approximation of the velocity around a point in the dispersed element [[sigma].sup.d] is a function of the deformation velocity tensor Dij and vorticity vector ! evaluated at the element center, i.e.


where [[member of].sub.ijk] is the alternator pseudo-tensor. (22) will be exact for spherical particles rotating with angular velocity [[OMEGA].sub.j] = 1/2[[omega].sub.j] and experiencing an isotropic deformation [D.sub.ij] = [??]/r [[delta].sub.ij], r being the particle radius and [??] the radius expansion rate per unit time (such a disperse element will be kinematically characterized by the set [v.sub.o], [OMEGA], r, [??]). Applying the divergence theorem it is not difficult to obtain


Taking into account the anti-symmetry properties of the alternator pseudotensor and the no-slip condition in the dispersed element surface, using (23), the 'extradeformation term' is written as:


When disperse elements of any shape move without deformation (translation and/or rigid rotation) (24) cancels. For a spherical particle ongoing isotropic expansion (24) is simply


The expression (25) can be interpreted, if desired, as volumetric viscous stress related to disperse element volume changes, affected by a pseudo-volumetric viscosity [[alpha].sup.d] 2/3[mu]. In any case, (24) allows the order of magnitude to be computed easily and the extradeformation term to be approximated for modelling purposes, making it clear that the term depends on the average of the deformation tensor inside the disperse elements. Depending on the relative order of magnitude of the shear rates on the mean flow, U/L , and on the disperse elements, [??]/[l.sup.d], the 'extradeformation term' could be dominant or negligible.

In order to illustrate the analitycal capabilities of the presented approach, let us consider a generalisation of (22) for the generic variable [phi]. Let us suppose that [phi] can be expressed inside the disperse element as a polynomial of type (which can be accepted at some degree of accuracy for any variable if the disperse element is small enough)

[phi](x') = [a.sub.0] + [b.sub.i][x'.sub.i] + [c.sub.ij][x'.sub.i][x'.sub.j] + [[delta].sub.ijl][x'.sub.i][x'.sub.j][x'.sub.l], (26)

where x' is the position of one disperse element point regarding its center x and [a.sub.0], {[b.sub.i]}, {[c.sub.ij]} and {[[delta].sub.ijl]} are coefficients which are functions only of the disperse element dynamics. It is clear that at (26) the magnitude order of the [phi] polynomial expression terms are not ([l.sup.d]/L), [([l.sup.d]/L).sup.2]], [([l.sup.d]/L).sup.3], since coefficients [b.sub.ij], [c.sub.ij] , [[delta].sub.ijl] are estimated in terms of the particle inner derivatives. Therefore, as many terms as necessary should be retained (26) to reconstruct the [phi] over the disperse element, without any contradiction with the limiting first order ([l.sup.d/L]) approach defined in (16). It is easy to show, applying Gauss theorem, that the interaction term for the spatial derivative in the k direction is calculated


where [I.sub.ij] are the geometrical inertia tensor components of the disperse element which, of course, depend on its shape.

The structure and symmetry properties of the series expansion coefficients of Eq. (26) allow us to simplify (27) which will help to model different interaction terms.

7 Conclusion

Derivation of the conditioned average essential relationships for general (laminar or turbulent) Two-Phase Flow, based on joint probability density and phase indicator functions, is presented in detail. No restrictions on shape, size or concentration of the disperse elements are required.

Useful transformations and related results have been documented specifically for disperse Two-Phase Flow. The final expressions provide consistent and meaningful interaction terms similar to others found with other indicator function and volume average procedures, but the adopted approach overcomes some conceptual and practical problems arising in these approaches and supplies helpful simplificative properties.

When the characteristic length of disperse elements is much smaller than the integral flow scale, interaction terms transform into particularly simple analytical structure. The interaction term is then split in two: a main contribution and a residue. The first one shows a fairly meaningful structure resembling the structure of the volume average interaction term; moreover, it has a precise mathematical definition and is computed as the average of the [phi] general property flux over the whole boundary of a single disperse element, conditioned to realizations where the disperse element volume center is located at the point in which the statistical average is evaluated. The remaining term, or residue, can be neglected regarding to the main contribution under specified conditions generally fulfilled at disperse Two-Phase Flow. In addition, the residue also shows a precise mathematical structure allowing it to be computed exactly or its order of magnitude to be approximated. As an illustrative example the presented expresions are used to derive the statistically averaged continuity and momentum equations for the continuous phase of a dispersed Two-Phase flow. The corresponding interaction terms, including the so-called 'extradeformation term', are in some cases calculated explicitely.


Here, (8) is demonstrated. In order to achieve


let us recall the following property of the Dirac delta in one dimension [11]


where [y.sub.s] are the zeros of the function g, i.e., the solutions of the equation g(y) = 0. It is supposed that the derivative dg/dy is different from zero at [y.sub.s].

In the three-dimensional case, the zeros of the equation g(y) = 0 are a continuous set and the appropriate generalization of the previous property will be


supposing that [absolute value of [nabla][sub.y]g]y = [y.sub.s] [not equal to] = 0 [for all] [y.sub.s] solution of g(y) = 0. The integral is extended to the domain defined by the zeros of g(y).

Here, the zeros, regarding y, of the function S(x-y) = 0 define a surface and then


where [y.sub.s] are the solution of S(x - y) = 0 for a given x. Changing the integration sequence and performing the integration on y using the Dirac's delta


The [y.sub.s] points constitute a surface given by S' = S(-([y.sub.s] -x)) as referred in the main text.


Latin symbols

[D.sub.sub.ij] [1/s] dispersed phase deformation tensor

f generic function

g [m/[s.sup.2]] acceleration of gravity

H Heaviside function

I indicator function

[I.sub.[phi][lambda]] main part interaction term

[I.sub.sub] interaction term

L [m] integral length scale

[l.sup.d] [m] characteristic particle size

n normal vector

p [Kg/m * [s.sup.2]] instantaneous gas pressure

P [Kg/m * [s.sup.2]] mean gas pressure

[P.sup.sup] probability density function

R [m] particle radius

S surface

t [s] time

u [m/s] instantaneous gas velocity

U [m/s] averaged gas velocity

[V.sup.sup] [[m.sup.3]]volume

x [m] spatial point

x' [m] relative location to particle center

[y.sup.sup] [m] particle center position

[Y.sup.N] Center position vector N particles

[z.sup.sup] dynamic variable

[Z.sup.N] Dynamic variable vector Nparticles

T [K] Temperature

Greek symbols

[alpha] [-] void fraction

[delta] Dirac's delta

[[member of].sub.ijk] alternator pseudo-tensor

[[member of].sub.[phi][lambda]] residue interaction term variable

[mu] [Kg/m * s] dynamic viscosity

[rho] [Kg/[m.sup.3]] density

[sigma]() order of magnitude

[[sigma].sup.j] discrete element j

[tau] [m.sup.2]/[s.sup.2]] stress tensor

v [m/s] instantaneous particle velocity

[phi] generic variable

w [1/s] vorticity

[OMEGA] [1/s] angular velocity

[I.sub.ij] [[m.sup.2]] geometric inertia tensor

N local particle number density


i spatial component

s surface

sub subscript


' fluctuating component

d dispersed phase

[lambda] spatial or temporal component

* time rate change

j label of element

sup superscript

Other Symbols

Tr[-] tensor trace

< > ensemble average

_ continuous phase conditioned average

[_.sup.d] dispersed phase conditioned average

_* centered disperse phase conditioned average

Recepci[acute accent]on:02-Oct-2007/Modificaci[acute accent]on:11-Mar-2008/Aceptaci[acute accent]on:07-Apr-2008 Se aceptan comentarios y/o discusiones al art[acute accent]iculo


[1] T. S. Lundgren. Slow flow through stationary random beds and suspensions of spheres. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, ISSN 0022-1120, 51(2), 273-299 (1972). Referenced in 48, 49

[2] J. L. Achard and J. M. Delhaye. On the averaging operators introduced in Two-phase flow modelling. In OECD/NEA Specialists Meeting on Transient Two-Phase Flow, 1976. Toronto, Canada. Referenced in 48

[3] Mamoru Ishii and Takashi Hibiki. Thermo-fluid dynamics of Two-phase flow. ISBN 0-387-28321-8. Springer, 2005. Referenced in 48, 63

[4] Richard Hercynski and Isabela Pienskowska. Toward a statistical theory of suspension. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, ISSN 0066-4189, 12, 237-269 (1980). Referenced in 48, 49

[5] D. Drew. Mathematical modelling of two phase flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, ISSN 0066-4189, 15, 261-291 (1983). Referenced in 48

[6] W. G. Gray and S. M. Hassanizadeh. Averaging theorems and averaged equations for transport of interface properties in multiphase systems. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, ISSN 0301-9322, 151, 81-95 (1989). Referenced in 48

[7] A. Prosperetti and D. Z. Zhang. Averaged equations for inviscid disperse Two-phase flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics Digital Archive, ISSN 0022-1120, 267, 185-219 (1994). Referenced in 49

[8] R. Aliod and C. Dopazo. A statistically conditioned averaging formalism for deriving Two-phase flow equations. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization, ISSN 0934-0866, 7, 191-202 (1990). Referenced in 49

[9] Santiago La[acute accent]in and R. Aliod. Deduction and validation of an Eulerian-Eulerian model for turbulent dilute Two-phase flows by means of the phase indicator function-disperse elements.pdf. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, ISSN 1004-9541, 8(3), 189-202 (2000). Referenced in 49

[10] Clayton T. Crowe, Martin Sommerfeld and Yutaka Tsuji. Multiphase flows with droplets and particles, ISBN 0-8493-9469-4. CRC Press, 1998. Referenced in 60

[11] G. F. Roach. Green's functions, ISBN 0-521-28288-8. Cambridge University Press, 1982. Referenced in 66

Santiago La[acute accent]in (1) and Ricardo Aliod (2)

(1) PhD in Physics,, profesor titular, Fluid Mechanics Research Group, Energetics and Mechanics Department, Universidad Aut[acute accent]onoma de Occidente, Cali-Colombia.

(2) PhD in Mechanical Engineering,, profesor titular, Fluid Mechanics Department, Escuela Universitaria Polit[acute accent]ecnica de Huesca, University of Zaragoza, Huesca-Spain.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Universidad EAFIT
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:La[acute accent]in, Santiago; Aliod, Ricardo
Publication:Ingenieria y Ciencia
Date:Jun 1, 2008
Previous Article:Algunas logicas modales asociadas al razonamiento de agentes inteligentes.
Next Article:Flujo de potencia optimo usando el metodo del gradiente para reduccion de perdidas en sistemas de potencia.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters