Analysis of food habits of skate Rioraja agassizii (Elasmobranchii, rajidae) from southern Brazil/Analise quantitativa dos habitos alimentares da raia Rioraja agassizii (Elasmobranchii, Rajidae) do Sudeste e Sul do Brasil.
Elasmobranchs present slow growth rate, late maturation, and low fecundity (Frisk, 2010). These factors, along with bycatch, can lead these organisms to a population decline, and the family Rajidae is one of the most vulnerable to exploitation (Dulvy and Reynolds, 2002).
The scenario of overfishing, lack of biological information, and catches led to overexploitation of various demersal elasmobranchs in Southeast Atlantic or South Occidental Atlantic (Vooren and Klippel, 2005). Gaichas et al. (2005) claim for a proper management to protect the Rajidae family against locally depletion, especially when little is known about habits and structure of the population.
According to Ellis et al. (2010), research shows that some species of Rajidae feature very unequal distributions, which may make them locally prone to depletion.
In Brazil, this family is represented by 11 genera and 26 species including the skate Rioraja agassizii (Muller and Henle, 1841), which occurs from the Espirito Santo State in Brazil to Argentina, more frequently on the coast of Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo States (Figueiredo, 1977). There is no conservation measure for the genera Atlantoraja and Rioraja (Hozbor et al., 2004; Massa et al., 2006; San Martin et al., 2007). The population of the genus Atlantoraja shows a trend to decline, however, for the genus Rioraja, this trend is still unknown (Kyne et al., 2007; IUCN, 2012). According to the IUCN, Atlantoraja castelnaui (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1907) is classified as "endangered at risk", while A. cyclophora (Regan, 1903), A. platana (Gunther, 1880) and Rioraja agassizii are listed as "vulnerable" (IUCN, 2012).
Although endemic, the Rajidae family features a diversified diet, consuming different prey types such as fish, mollusks, and crustaceans (Ebert and Bizzarro, 2007). Because they inhabit higher trophic levels, they can compete directly with deep-sea fish (Link and Garrison, 2002). According to Wetherbee and Cortes (2004), to understand the energy flow between trophic levels, it is necessary to understand not only what elasmobranchs eat, but also characterize their digestion, energy processing, and nutrients in the prey consumed.
Food biology of sharks and skates have been studied to understand the natural history of a particular species, its ecological role in the ecosystem, the predation impact on preys with economic value such as the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817) and F. paulensis (Perez-Farfante, 1967), and risks of extinction due to overexploitation (Wetherbee and Cortes, 2004; Aguiar and Valentin, 2010).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Many studies have investigated the diet and feeding habits of fish based on the analysis of stomach contents, but there is a lack of consistency in the results (Cortes, 1997). According to Vianna et al. (2000), studies on feeding habits are important to explain changes in aspects of fish growth, migration and reproduction.
Because of the constant catches of R. agassizii, especially bycatch, trawl fisheries, with high rejection on board, export increase, and mainly lack of information, the species was classified as "vulnerable". The knowledge of biological and ecological factors of this species is important for its effective management and conservation. This study described and quantified the diet composition of R. agassizii using stomach contents of specimens captured during 2005-2006 and 2012-2013 in southern Brazil.
2. Material and Methods
We analyzed stomach contents in 351 specimens of R. agassizii from March 2005 to April 2006 captured by fishing pair trawling, at depths ranging from 10 to 146 m. Between June 2012 to September 2013, we captured 49 specimens by means of pink shrimp double trows, at depths of 25 to 70 m. There was no specimen sampling during the closed shrimp season between March 1st and May 31st, 2013 (Brasil, 2008) for the sampling period of 2012-2013. In both periods, the study site includes the coastal region from the states of Rio de Janeiro to Santa Catarina, southern Brazil (see Figure 1).
The specimens collected were identified, sexed, weighed (TW, kg) and the total length (TL, cm) was measured. After removal, their stomachs were weighed on a 1-g precision balance and classified at five levels in terms of repletion degree (RD): empty stomach = RD 0; almost empty (up to 25%) = RD I; half full (25-50%) = RD II; almost full (51-75%) = RD III; and full stomach (>75%) = RD IV (Soares et al., 1999; Dolgov, 2005).
The stomach contents were preserved in alcohol 70% for crustaceans, and in formalin 10% for fish. Afterwards, the contents were identified in taxonomic groups and weighed. The digestion degree of each prey was registered in three levels, as follows: undigested, with no signs of digestion = 1; partially digested, but identifiable = 2; and digested without identification with presence of otoliths, crystalline, and other appendages = 3 (Soares and Apelbaum, 1994).
Each item of stomach contents was identified for the lowest possible taxon, according to identification guides (Figueiredo, 1977; Figueiredo and Menezes, 1978, 1980; Menezes and Figueiredo, 1985) and crustaceans (Melo, 1996, 1999; Perez-Farfante and Kensley, 1997; Carpenter, 2002; Costa et al., 2003). For food analysis, abundance was represented by number of individuals (N%) of each item. For biomass calculation, we used the weight (W%) and calculated the frequency of occurrence (FO%) of the food items in the stomach contents. We also estimated the index of relative importance (IRI), which establishes the importance of food items, using the formula of Schwingel and Castello (1994). For items of greater food importance, the IRI value was higher than 1,000. For items of intermediate importance, the IRI ranged between 50-1,000, and those with lesser importance, the IRI values were smaller than 50.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
3.1. Samples from 2005-2006
Of the 351 specimens sampled between 2005-2006, 93.1% were adults and only 6.9% juveniles. The sample contained 88 males with TL between 29.3-56.2 cm and 259 females with TL ranging from 26.5-58.2 cm. Four specimens, one female and three males, did not provide TL measures, because their tails were damaged. Figure 2a shows the TL distribution of the groups of sex of 347 specimens.
Only 5.2% of stomachs examined were empty and 94.8% contained some food. Most stomachs (35.9%) showed RD I, followed by 20.8%, RD II; 27%, RD III; and 11.1%, RD IV Three major groups were identified, and shrimps (Penaeidae family) were the most important food source with IRI = 7,213.6, followed by unidentified fish with IRI = 649.7 (as shown in Table 1). Among the shrimps, we identified Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Heller, 1862), Farfantepenaeus paulensis, Rimapenaeus constrictus (Stimpson, 1874), and Litopenaeus schmitthi (Burkenroad, 1936).
3.2. Samples from 2012-2013
A number of 49 stomachs of 49 specimens of R. agassizii. Of the total sampled, two specimens were males with TL of 48.5 and 71.5 cm. The TL of females ranged from 26.3-76.5 cm and all individuals were adults. Figure 2b shows the TL histogram for grouped sex of the specimens sampled.
The results showed that 20.4% of the stomachs had RD 0; 36.7%, RD I; 20.4%, RD II; 8.2%, RD III; and 14.3%, RD IV We identified three major food groups: fish, crustaceans, and mollusks, among which the teleostei group had the highest representativeness for food source according to the IRI, followed by decapods (as shown in Table 2). Most fish (N = 27.1%) were classified as "unidentified fish" because of the advanced digestion state (grade 3) observing only with presence of otoliths, crystalline, and appendices. The ost representative groups among the Teleostei fish were the Paralichthyidae family with N = 8.2%. In the group of decapods, the food item of greater importance was the shrimp with IRI = 746.8, followed by the Achelous spinicarpus (Stimpson, 1871) with IRI = 364.9.
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The food items were grouped into Teleostei (fish), Penaeidae (shrimp), Brachyura (crabs), Crustacea (Squillidae, Nephropidae) to facilitate the comparison of periods. We also observed a difference in the diet composition ofR. agassizii in the 2005-2006 period, predominated by decapods, mainly shrimps of the family Penaeidae. Comparatively, in 2012-2013, the Teleostei fish showed the largest IRI and FO levels (see Figure 3). We also observed a difference between the structure of the two populations, where in 2012-2013, the sample showed a smaller number of specimens, but with greater TL from 71.5 to 80 cm and predominance between 50-60 cm. On the other hand, the sample of 2005-2006 showed the highest number of specimens, however, with predominance between 45-50 cm with maximum TL of 60 cm. In both samples, all specimens were adults, which is confirmed in the literature (Oddone et al., 2007).
According to Muto et al. (2001), R. agassizii feeds on benthic items, mainly crustaceans such as shrimp and crabs, corroborated by the results obtained in the sample collected between 2005-2006. Food chronology of this skate was also studied by Soares et al. (1999), which concluded that its diets was also based on crustaceans and small teleostei fish. Soares et al. (1999) and Muto et al. (2001) performed his works on the coast of Ubatuba (Sao Paulo-SP State, Brazil) from scientific cruises, in a different sampling scenario from that conducted by commercial fishing boats.
The differences, comparing the two periods studied in this work with results obtained by other authors, were probably caused by different fishing gears (pair trawling and double trawls) that were used at different depths, sample size, time interval, in addition to the biotic and oceanographic factors.
The small number of specimens captured in the 2012-2013 sample may have been caused by ecological factors, environmental changes, modification of the fishing area, and fishing pressure from other vessels, since other studies show that this species is considered abundant in trawling.
Mazzoleni and Schwingel (1999) observed that the species R. agassizii, A. cyclophora, A. castelnaui, and A. platana, from catches of the fishing fleet landed in Itajai (Santa Catarina State, Brazil), are classified as abundant in pair trawling. Muto et al. (2001) also consider R. agassizii and Psammobatis extenta (Garman, 1913) important in terms of abundance and biomass on the coast of Ubatuba (SP State, Brazil).
The fact that fish was the group with the highest IRI in 2012-2013 does not characterize a change in diet of R. agassizii, because decapods, mainly shrimps, were also identified in the stomach contents. For Schwingel and Assuncao (2009), the Rajidae feature varied diet, while Muto et al. (2001) state that the diet of R. agassizii was based on shrimps (Caridae and Penaeidae) and small teleostei fish. According to Marion et al. (2011), the presence of crustaceans in the stomach contents of batoid elasmobranchs is relatively common, as found in Zapteryx brevirostris and other studies.
Barbini and Lucifora (2011) also studied feeding habits of R. agassizii, however, in the region between Uruguay and Argentina, and observed values similar to the IRI for teleostei fish and decapods, 34.4% and 33.9%, respectively. The authors also observed that their results are different from results obtained by Soares et al. (1999) and Muto et al. (2001) on the coast of Ubatuba (SP State, Brazil). The results obtained by Barbini and Lucifora (2011) were similar to those found in the 2012-2013 sampling, with fish showing IRI values slightly higher than those for the group of decapods.
The presence (or absence) of a prey in the stomach of predator may be attributed to the availability (or not) in the environment or to the facility or difficulty of capture (Zavala-Camin, 1996). Seasonal and geographical differences found in food diets are more related to prey community and availability, which can change, for example, due to intense fishing activity (Muto et al., 2001; Wetherbee and Cortes, 2004; Ebert and Bizzarro, 2007; Aguiar and Valentin, 2010). The quantity and quality of foods ingested are associated with the life cycle, prey and predator sizes and the digestion degree (Bowen, 1983).
Changes in diet observed in the 2012-2013 sample and by authors Barbini and Lucifora (2011) may indicate a change in the eating habits of R. agassizii due to environmental and anthropogenic factors, therefore, further studies connecting the diet with the area of capture, seasonality, depth, and other factors are required.
Mazzoleni and Schwingel (1999) state that the increase of fisheries for elasmobranchs in Brazil can be a result of increased international demand for meat of Rajidae. This fact can be confirmed, because data from the Information Analysis System for Foreign Trade (ALICEWEB2, 2013) of the Foreign Trade Secretariat show that from January 1997 to September 2013, Brazilian exports to South Korea reached roughly 2,500 t of skates of the Rajidae family classified in two categories: fresh or chilled and frozen (ALICEWEB2, 2013).
The population structure of samples was also different, where the specimens collected in 2012-2013 showed greater TL, while specimens from the 2005-2006 sample had a higher FO and smaller TL.
The diet of the skate R. agassizii in both periods analyzed was composed of the same food groups, however in the 2012-2013 period, the main diet group was teleostei fish captured at lower depths (25-70 m). In the 2005-2006 period, the most important group was the decapods, mainly shrimps captured at higher and lower depths (10-146 m). These differences were probably caused by different fishing gears used at different depths and sampling period, besides the biological, ecological, and oceanographic factors.
We give thanks to CAPES for the opportunity and for the scholarship granted. We are also thankful to all my colleagues at the Instituto de Pesca who helped us to collect and sort samples. We give thanks to all the researchers and interns at the Instituto de Pesca that had some collaboration with this article.
AGUIAR, A.A. and VALENTIN, J.L., 2010. Biologia e ecologia alimentar de elasmobranquios (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii): uma revisao dos metodos e do estado da arte no Brasil. Oecologia Australis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 464-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2010.1402.09.
ALICEWEB2, 2013 [viewed 9 October 2013]. Sistema de analise das informacoes de comercio exterior via internet: AliceWeb2 [online]. Available from: http://aliceweb2.mdic.gov.br
BARBINI, S.A. and LUCIFORA, L.O., 2011. Feeding habits of the rio skate, Riorajagassizi (Chondrichthyes, Rajidae), from off Uruguay and north Argentina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 91, no. 06, pp. 1175-1184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315410001529.
BOWEN, S.H., 1983. Quantitative description of the diet. In: L.A. NIELSEN and D.L. JOHNSON, eds. Fishery techniques. Maryland: American Fishery Society, pp. 325-336.
BRASIL. Ministerio do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renovaveis, 2008. Instrucao Normativa no. 189, de 23 de setembro de 2008. Diario Oficial da Republica Federativa do Brasil, Brasilia, 23 set.
CARPENTER, K.E., 2002. The living marine resources of the Western Central Atlantic. Rome: FAO, vol. 1. 600 p. Special Publication, No. 5.
CORTES, E., 1997. A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 726-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f96-316.
COSTA, R.C., FRANSOZO, A., MELO, G.A.S. and FREIRE, F.A.M., 2003. Chave ilustrada para identificacao dos camaroes dendrobranchiata do litoral norte do estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil. BiotaNeotropica, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032003000100011.
DOLGOV, A.V., 2005. Feeding and Food Consumption by the Barents Sea Skates. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, vol. 35, pp. 495-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.2960/Tv35.m523.
DULVY, N.K. and REYNOLDS, J.D., 2002. Predicting extinction vulnerability in skates. Conservation Biology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 440-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00416.x.
EBERT, D.A. and BIZZARRO, J.J., 2007. Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of skates (Chondrichthyes, Rajiformes, Rajoidei). Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 80, no. 2-3, pp. 221-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9227-4.
ELLIS, J.R., SILVA J.F., MCCULLY, S.R., EVANS, M. and CATCHPOLE T., 2010. UK fisheries for skates (Rajidae): history and development of the fishery, recent management actions and survivorship of discards. Denmark: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 38 p. ICES CM/E:10.
FIGUEIREDO, J.L., 1977. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. I Introducao. Cacoes, raias e quimeras. Sao Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo. 104 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.109986.
FIGUEIREDO, I.L. and MENEZES, N.A., 1978. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. II. Teleostei (1). Sao Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo. 110 p.
FIGUEIREDO, I.L. and MENEZES, N.A., 1980. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. III. Teleostei (2). Sao Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo. 90 p.
FRISK, M.G., 2010. Life History Strategies of Batoids. In: J.C. CARRIER, J.A. MUSICK and M.R. HEITHAUS. Sharks and their relatives II: biodiversity, adaptive physiology, and conservation life history strategies of batoids. New York: CRC Press, pp. 283-316.
GAICHAS, S., SAGALKIN, N., GBURSKI, C., STEVENSON, D. and SWANSON, R., 2005. Gulf of Alaska skates. In: NORTH PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL--NPFMC. Stock assessment and fishery e-valuation report for the groundfish resources of the Gulf of Alaska. Anchorage: NPFMC, pp. 881-926.
HOZBOR, N., MASSA, A. and VOOREN, C.M., 2004 [viewed 24 July 2012]. Atlantoraja castelnaui. In: INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE--IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1 [online]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE--IUCN, 2012 [viewed 24 July 2012]. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1 [online]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
KYNE, P.M., SAN MARTIN, J. and STEHMANN, M.F.W., 2007 [viewed 24 July 2012]. Rioraja agassizii. In: INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE--IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1 [online]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
LINK, J.S. and GARRISON, L.P, 2002. Changes in piscivory associated with fishing induced changes to the finfish community on Georges Bank. Fisheries Research, vol. 55, no. 1-3, pp. 71-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00300-9.
MARION, C., VASKE-JUNIOR, T., GADIG, O.B.F. and MARTINS, I.A., 2011. Feeding habits of the shortnose guitarfish, Zapteryx brevirostris (Muller and Henle, 1841) (Elasmobranchii, Rhinobatidae) in southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 83-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842011000100013. PMid:21437403.
MASSA, A., HOZBOR, N. and VOOREN, C.M., 2006 [viewed 24 July 2012]. Atlantoraja cyclophora. In: INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE--IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1 [online]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
MAZZOLENI, R.C. and SCHWINGEL, P.R., 1999. Elasmobranch species landed in Itajai harbor (southern Brazil). Notas Tecnicas FACIMAR, vol. 3, pp. 111-119.
MELO, G.A.S., 1996. Manual de identificacao dos Brachyura (caranguejos e siris) do litoral brasileiro. Sao Paulo: Pleiade. 604 p.
MELO, G.A.S., 1999. Manual de identificacao dos Crustacea Decapoda do litoral brasileiro. Sao Paulo: Pleiade. 551 p.
MENEZES, N.A. and FIGUEIREDO, I.L., 1985. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. V. Teleostei (4). Sao Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo. 105 p.
MUTO, E.Y., SOARES, L.S.H. and GOITEIN, R., 2001. Food resource utilization of the skates Rioraja agassizii (Muller and Henle, 1841) and Psammobatis extenta (Garman, 1913) on the continental shelf off Ubatuba, South-eastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia =. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 217-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71082001000200005.
ODDONE, M.C., AMORIM, A.F., MANCINI, PL., NORBIS, W. and VELASCO, G.A., 2007. The reproductive biology and cycle of Rioraja agassizi (Muller & Henle, 1841) (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae) in southeast Brazil, SW Atlantic Ocean. Scientia Marina, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 593-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2007.71n3593.
PEREZ-FARFANTE, I. and KENSLEY, B., 1997. Penaeoid and sergestoid shrimps andprawns of the world: keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Los Angeles: University of California. 233 p. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, no. 175.
SAN MARTIN, J.M., STEHMANN, M.F.W. and KYNE, P.M., 2007 [viewed 24 July 2012]. Atlantorajaplatana. In: INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE--IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1 [online]. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org
SCHWINGEL, PR. and ASSUNCAO, R., 2009. Habitos alimentares da raia Atlantoraja platana (Gunther, 1880) (Elasmobranchii, Rajidae) no litoral norte de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 446-455.
SCHWINGEL, P.R. and CASTELLO, J.P, 1994. Alimentacion de la anchoita (Engraulis anchoita) en el sur de Brasil. Frente Maritimo, vol. 15, pp. 67-85.
SOARES, L.S.,H. and APELBAUM, R., 1994. Atividade alimentar diaria da cabrinha Prionotus punctatus (Teleostei: Triglidae) do litoral de Ubatuba, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanografico, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 85-98.
SOARES, L.S.H., VAZZOLER, A.E.A.M. and CORREA, A.R., 1999. Diel feeding chronology of the skate Raja agassizii (Muller and Henle) (Pisces, Elasmobranchii) on the continental shelf off Ubatuba, southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 201-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010181751999000100016.
VIANNA, M., ARFELLI, C.A. and AMORIM, A.F., 2000. Feeding of Mustelus canis (Elasmobranchii, Triakidae) caught off south-southeast coast of Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, vol. 26, pp. 79-84.
VOOREN, C.M. and KLIPPEL, S., 2005. Biologia e status de conservacao do cacao-listrado Mustelus fasciatus. In: C.M. VOOREN and S. KLIPPEL, eds. Acoes para a conservacao de tubaroes e raias no sul do Brasil. Porto Alegre: Igare, pp. 83-96.
WETHERBEE, B.M. and CORTES, E., 2004. Food consumption and feeding habits. In: J.C. CARRIER, J.A. MUSICK and M.R. HEITHAUS, eds. Biology of sharks and their relatives. Bocca Raton: CRC Press, pp. 225-246.
ZAVALA-CAMIN, L.A. 1996. Introducao aos estudos sobre alimentacao natural em peixes. Maringa: EDUEM. 129 p.
N. S. Motta (a) *, N. Deua-Fina (a), C. C. A. Souza (a), E. S. Rodrigues (a) and A. F Amorim (a)
(a) Programa de Pos-graduacao em Aquicultura e Pesca, Instituto de Pesca--IP, Agencia Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegocios--APTA, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento--SAA, Av. Bartolomeu de Gusmao, 192, Ponta da Praia, CEP 11031-906, Santos, SP, Brazil
* e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received: October 14, 2014--Accepted: January 14, 2015--Distributed: May 31, 2016
(With 3 figures)
Table 1. Diet composition of skate Rioraja agassizii in the 2005-2006 period. PREYS %N %M %FO IRI %IRI TELEOSTEI# 3.2# 43.5# 14.7# 686.5# 7.2# Bothidae (Bothus sp.) 0.0 1.7 0.3 0.4 - Unidentified teleosts 3.2 41.8 14.5 649.7 - CRUSTACEA# 92.9# 44.0# 65.0# 8,901.1# 92.8 Penaeidae 90.9 37.0 56.4 7,213.6 - Brachyura 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.2 - Portunidae 0.9 2.5 4.7 15.8 - Squillidae 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 - Unidentified crustaceans 1.0 4.1 3.2 16.3 - MOLLUSCA_CEPHALOPODA# 0.1# 0.5# 0.5# 0.3# <0.01# Unidentified cephalopods 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.3 - N%--numerical percentage; M%--mass percentage; FO%--frequency of occurrence percentage; IRI--index of relative importance; IRI%--percentage of IRI. Bold indicates the largest taxonomic group. Note: Largest taxonomic group is indicated with #. Table 2. Diet composition of skate Rioraja agassizii, in 2012 and 2013. PREYS N% M% FO% IRI IRI% TELEOSTEI# 50.0# 78.3# 64.1# 8,224.7# 62.0# Paralichthyidae 8.2 14.8 15.4 354.9 - Ophidiidae (Raneya brasiliensis) 0.8 1.6 2.6 6.1 - Anguiliforme 2.2 6.4 7.7 66.6 - Mullidae (Mullus sp) 1.5 10.7 2.6 31.3 - Triglidae (Prionotus sp) 0.8 13.0 2.6 35.5 - Batrachoididae 0.8 10.8 2.6 29.7 - (Porichthys porosissimus) Unidentified teleosts 35.8 19.2 46.2 2,540.3 - CRUSTACEA# 48.5# 21.7# 71.8# 5,039.6# 38.0# Brachyura 1.5 2.5 5.1 20.7 - Portunidae 12.7 3.1 23.1 364.9 - (Achelous spinicarpus) Nephropidae 3.0 5.1 10.3 83.3 - (Metanephrops rubellus) Penaeidae 22.4 1.9 30.8 746.8 - Squillidae 3.0 6.2 10.3 94.2 - Unidentified crustaceans 6.0 4.5 15.4 160.7 - MOLLUSCA_GASTROPODA# 1.5# 0.01# 5.1# 7.7# 0.1# Unidentified gastropods 1.5 0.01 5.1 7.7 - N%--numerical percentage; M%--mass percentage; FO%--frequency of occurrence percentage; IRI--index of relative importance; IRI%--percentage of IRI. Bold letters indicates the largest taxonomic group.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Original Article|
|Author:||Motta, N.S.; Della-Fina, N.; Souza, C.C.A.; Rodrigues, E.S.; Amorim, A.F.|
|Publication:||Brazilian Journal of Biology|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2016|
|Previous Article:||Biomass allocation and nutrients balance related to the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus in Salvinia auriculata (Salviniaceae)/Alocacao de...|
|Next Article:||Microturbellarians (Platyhelminthes and Acoelomorpha) in Brazil: invisible organisms?/Microturbelarios (Platyhelminthes e Acoelomorpha) no Brasil:...|