An estimation of Canada's public health physician workforce.
We used data from the 2004 National Physician Survey (NPS) to estimate the size of the active, qualified Canadian public health physician workforce and the numbers of qualified public health physicians, both active and inactive (i.e., 'in reserve') in public health practice, who might potentially be available in a public health emergency.
The NPS is a collaborative effort of the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC). The first survey cycle was in 2004; survey methodologies and questionnaires are available on the NPS website. (9) The sampling frame for the survey was the CMA Masterfile, a comprehensive database of Canadian physicians which "includes all physicians in Canada holding a medical license and is compiled and updated on a daily basis with information received from provincial licensing bodies, associations, CFPC and RCPSC membership listings, and individual physicians". (9) The national response rate was 35.9%. (10) Respondents were very similar (province/territory, age, sex, and broad medical specialty groups) both to the general physician population and to non-respondents. (10)
Definition of public health physician
We used three methods to define a public health physician. For each, we assumed such a physician could either be a family physician or general practitioner (FP/GP), or be a certified specialist in Community Medicine (CM), General Internal Medicine (IM) or Pediatrics (Ped). CM is the recognized medical specialty in Canada for public health. From our knowledge of the pattern of public health practice in Canada, we expected that most non-CM-prepared doctors in public health practice would be either FP/GP or specialists in General Internal Medicine (IM) or Pediatrics (Ped).
Self-reported degrees and certifications were captured using open-ended questions: "Please specify any medical certification(s)" and "Please specify any other non-medical degrees." We reviewed and categorized the 7,171 self-reported non-medical degrees and certifications (Table 1).* Physicians were classified as qualified to practice public health if they held one or more of a 'core public health' degree or 'certification in Community Medicine/Public Health'.
We also considered the self-reported public health practice of physicians. The NPS included a listing of 141 professional activities (for specialists) and 35 for FP/GP, with instructions to check all that applied. Both lists included the item 'community medicine/public health'.
Public health physicians were defined as being respondents:
1. Categorized by the CMA Masterfile as being "Community Medicine/ Public Health"; OR
2. Qualified by virtue of Community Medicine specialty certification or holding a core public health degree obtained after medical training; OR
3. Indicating "community medicine/public health" as an area of professional activity.
Active versus reserve public health physicians
Physicians who reported 'community medicine/public health' as an area of professional activity were considered to be members of the active workforce; otherwise they were considered in reserve.
Potential impact of including other medical specialties
To assess the impact of our assumption that most public health doctors would be found among FP/GP and CM, IM and Ped specialists, we examined the numbers of NPS respondents (excluding these physician groups) who held self-reported core public health degrees or certifications.
To take into consideration that physicians from specialties other than Community Medicine are trained in skills related to 'emergency preparedness', we identified relevant groups of physicians by examining training objectives and requirements for Royal College specialists and CFPC certificants. (11,12) Because the data were unavailable through the 2004 NPS, we estimated their numbers from the Directory of Fellows of the RCPSC (May, 2008) (13) and from a search of the website of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians using the terms "human resource" and "emergency medicine". (14)
Weightings for Differential Response Rates
While the NPS respondents have been reported to be representative of the physician population, (10) response rates varied by type of physician: CM 40.3%, FP/GP 35.7%, IM 32.7%, and Ped 40.5%. Thus we weighted the number of respondents by the inverse of the response rate for each type of physician to obtain estimates of the total number of public health physicians in Canada (e.g., for CM, the weighting was calculated as 154 x (1/.403).
The University of British Columbia Behavioural Ethics Review Board approved the 2004 NPS. The Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary and the Technical Advisory Committee of the NPS approved this study.
We obtained detailed data for 12,762 (154 CM, 730 IM, 837 Ped, and 11,041 FP/GP) of the 21,296 doctors across all specialties who responded to the 2004 NPS. Estimates of the number of public health physicians in Canada range from 382 (if only those classified as CM by the CMA Masterfile are considered) to 769 (if all qualified physicians are enumerated) to 5,020 (if all physicians who indicate 'community medicine/public health' as an area of professional activity are considered) (Table 2). Among physicians indicating 'community medicine/public health' as an area of professional activity, 95.5% were FP/GP and 4.6% were CM; all specialists who indicated that area of practice held a credential, in contrast to only 6.6% of the FP/GP physicians. Of the estimated 382 to 769 physicians qualified to practice public health according to our definitions, a large proportion are 'in reserve' rather than active: 40.3% of those classified as CM by the CMA Masterfile; 42.4% of those qualified solely on the basis of self-reported core public health degree/certifications; and 52.3% of those qualified on the basis of self-reported credentials or by classification as CM by the CMA Masterfile (Table 2). This corresponds to a total credentialed 'in reserve' workforce for the country of 268-402 public health doctors.
Potential impact of including other medical specialties In the 2004 NPS data, there were 22 physicians representing 13 specialty groups who held a public health degree among doctors classified by the CMA Masterfile indicator as other than CM, IM, Ped or FP/GP. These represent an additional weighted estimate of 65 public health physicians (mostly likely 'in reserve').
Table 3 lists counts of physicians from specialties other than CM that include emergency preparedness among their training objectives, as well as a summary of the relevant training. (13,14) This enumeration could add 1,873 physicians to our estimation of the number of deployable public health doctors, at least for the purposes of a public health emergency.
The purpose of this paper was to provide a best estimate of the number of public health doctors in Canada who could be available in the event of a public health emergency. We would then be in a position to speculate on whether the number was adequate and to make recommendations if it were not. In Canada, fewer than 800 physicians (1.3%) are qualified to practice public health by virtue of medical specialty training or post-graduate credential. Over half of these physicians are currently 'in reserve' including 40% of Community Medicine specialists. The contribution of 'in reserve' physicians to a public health emergency would be dependent upon their availability to take up emergency duties as well as the assumption that those physicians credentialed only with degrees possess the necessary skills to minimally meet the recently developed competencies of a Medical Officer of Health, particularly in the domain of mitigation of immediate risks to human health. (8)
How many public health physicians would Canada need in the event of a public health emergency? The Institute of Medicine estimated that for the United States, the number would be between 17,000 and 23,500, of whom 10,000 were thought to be already employed in public health agencies throughout the country. (15) The comparable numbers (proportionate to population) for Canada would be 1,863-2,576, suggesting that Canada at best meets 40% of these requirements.
How accurate are these estimates? The numbers of CM (382) projected from the NPS data are similar to the 347 CM counted (May 2008) from the public registry of the Royal College Directory of Fellows. This provides some assurance of the validity of our estimations from NPS data despite its response rate of 36%, and suggests that respondents did not differ systematically (with respect to public health credentials) from non-respondents. Other data sources might be considered for estimating the size of the public health physician workforce. An enumeration of Medical Officers of Health and Associate/Deputy Medical Officers of Health could be obtained perhaps from a survey of provincial/territorial Chief Medical Officers of Health; however such a count, even if accurate, would not capture qualified physicians working for other employers including the federal government and universities. An analysis of physician resource databases held by the Canadian Institute for Health Information, such as Scott's Medical Database, might also be considered but while this database captures specialty certifications, it does not collect information on non-medical degrees.
Our inclusion of other medical specialties whose certificants might be considered to be 'public health doctors' under conditions of a public health emergency by virtue of training in emergency preparedness could increase estimates by an additional 1,873 physicians, although the appropriateness of their inclusion is arguable. The Institute of Medicine, (15) after noting that all doctors intersect with public health to at least some degree intermittently, notes that only public health doctors are explicitly trained to address issues using a population-based approach. Public health emergencies may arise from weather, environmental exposures, communicable disease outbreaks or terrorist (including bioterrorist) incidents. Public health physicians must be able "to communicate public health information, roles, capacities and legal authority accurately to all emergency response partners, to develop and maintain agreements with partners, to describe the chain of command and incident response system, to conduct risk assessments in public health emergencies, to develop and deliver accurate event-specific, science-based risk communication messages to the public, to health care providers, to the media, and to the response community". (16,17) The focus of the responsibilities for other physicians with ostensible emergency preparedness training is primarily in prehospital/hospital care, particularly for mass casualties and for infectious diseases. Their functions lack the population focus of the public health physician, and also lack the specific powers and authority explicitly granted to public health physicians who are employed in the legally mandated role of Medical Officer of Health. (8) These physicians would also likely be fully engaged in direct patient care responsibilities in hospitals and emergency departments during mass casualty or outbreak situations.
Finally, what are we to make of the over 5,000 Canadian physicians, 95% of whom were FP/GP without a public health degree, who indicated 'community medicine/public health' among their listing of areas of professional activity? Either the vast majority of Canadian doctors who indicate practice in 'community medicine/ public health' do not appear to be credentialed to do so, or the practice area is interpreted differently by respondents with credentials compared with respondents without public health training. Respondents with credentials might have interpreted the term as having a scope similar to the Index Medicus MESH heading for public health: "Branch of medicine concerned with the prevention and control of disease and disability, and the promotion of physical and mental health of the population on the international, national, state, or municipal level." Others might have interpreted it more in terms of the scope of the Index Medicus MESH term for Community Medicine: "A branch of medicine concerned with the total health of the individual within the home environment and in the community, and with the application of comprehensive care to the prevention and treatment of illness in the entire community." The latter, in particular, is a scope of practice with which many primary care physicians might identify.
In this paper, data from the 2004 NPS have been used to estimate Canadian public health human resources and to explore practice patterns, as others have done for other types of Canadian physicians. (18-20) We have defined a public health doctor in Canada as someone who is either trained in the specialty of Community Medicine or qualified by virtue of obtaining a public health credential after medical training. The estimation of Canada's public health doctors is an exercise with value beyond public health emergency preparedness planning as it is unclear how many physicians should be counted as part of the public health workforce. We suggest that future cycles of the NPS, in addition to striving to increase response rates, should include an improved set of questions based upon public health roles, including those for public health emergencies, to identify qualified public health physicians and to ascertain their current areas of practice. Public health emergency preparedness planning exercises should delineate public health physician roles and needs, and actions should be taken accordingly to enhance the capacity of the Canadian public health physician workforce to meet these requirements.
Received: June 30, 2008
Accepted: January 9, 2009
(1.) National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health. Learning from SARS--Renewal of Public Health in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada, 2003. Available online at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/sars-sras/ naylor/(Accessed November 16, 2007).
(2.) Health Council of Canada. Modernizing the Management of Health Human Resources in Canada: Identifying Areas for Accelerated Change. Report from a National Summit, June 23, 2005. Available online at: http://healthcouncilcanada.ca/ docs/papers/2005/HCC_HHRsummit_2005_eng.pdf (Accessed April 1, 2008).
(3.) Joint Task Group on Public Health Human Resources. A Pan-Canadian Framework for Public Health Human Resources Planning, October 2005. Available online at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/php-psp/pdf/building_the_public_ health_workforce_fo_%20the-21stc_e.pdf (Accessed April 1, 2008).
(4.) Public Health Agency of Canada. The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan for the Health Sector. 2006. Available online at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ cpippclcpi/index-eng.php (Accessed April 1, 2008).
(5.) Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The Future of Public Health in Canada: Developing a Public Health System for the 21st Century. Ottawa: 2003.
(6.) Medical surge capacity and capability: A management system for integrating medical and health resources during large-scale emergencies. Report No.: IPR/11079. Contract No.:233-03-0028. Supported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CNA Corporation, 2004.
(7.) Public Health Agency of Canada. Core Competencies in Public Health, 2007. Available online at: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ccph-cesp/stmtsenoneng.html (Accessed February 27, 2008).
(8.) MOH Competencies Working Group, Public Health Agency of Canada. A Draft Set of Core Competencies for Medical Officers of Health in Canada, Draft 3.1, April 2008. Available online at: www.nsscm.ca (Accessed October 5, 2008).
(9.) National Physician Survey. Methodologies. Available online at: http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2004_Survey/methods/ methodologies2004-e.asp (Accessed March 25, 2008).
(10.) CIHI. Analytical Bulletin 2005 - 1: 2004 National Physician Survey Response Rates and Comparability of Physician Distributions with Those of the Physician Population. May 2005. Available online at: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/ dispPage.jsp?cw_page=bl_npsmay2005_e (Accessed November 18, 2007).
(11.) Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Information by Specialty. Available online at: http://rcpsc.medical.org/information/index.php (Accessed May 27, 2008).
(12.) College of Family Physicians of Canada. Standards for Accreditation of Residency Programs, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cfpc.ca/English/ cfpc/education/accreditation/ default.asp?s=1 (Accessed May 27, 2008).
(13.) Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Directory of Fellows. Available online at: http://royalcollege.ca/index_e.php (Accessed May 28, 2008).
(14.) Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Human Resources Issues in Emergency Medicine. Available online at: http://www.caep.ca/ template.asp?id=4DE69C13B70C4BF48D79 D786BA2537D2 (Accessed June 24, 2008).
(15.) Institute of Medicine Committee on Training Physicians for Public Health Careers. Hernandez LM, Munthali AW (Eds.), Training Physicians for Public Health Careers. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007;97.
(16.) Bioterrorism & Emergency Readiness: Competencies for All Public Health Workers. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 2002.
(17.) Core Public Health Worker Competencies for Emergency Preparedness and Response. Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY: Columbia University, 2001.
(18.) Beaudet AM, Baerlocher MO. A profile of Canada's radiologists: Results from the 2004 National Physician Survey. Can Assoc Radiol J 2006;57(5):272-77.
(19.) Higginson LA. Profile of the cardiovascular specialist physician workforce in Canada, 2004. Can J Cardiol 2005;21(13):1157-62.
(20.) Hogan DB. 2004 National Physician Survey: Geriatric Medicine Specialists. Can J Geriatrics 2006;9(Suppl. 1):S27-S28.
* McIntyre has special expertise in degree classification, having served as a health disciplines dean for 13.5 years.
Margaret L. Russell, MD, PhD, FRCPC and Lynn McIntyre, MD, MHSc, FRCPC
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Correspondence and reprint requests: Dr. Margaret Russell, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Tel: 403-220-4279, Fax: 403-270-7307, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Acknowledgements: This study was supported by a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada. The study described in this paper was conducted utilizing original data collected for the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's (RCPSC) 2004 National Physician Survey (NPS) Database. The NPS was also supported by the Canadian Institute for Health Information, and Health Canada. The NPS and all of the data contained therein are the copyright-protected works of the CFPC, CMA, and RCPSC and cannot be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without permission of the CFPC, CMA, and RCPSC. The authors acknowledge data analysis support from Sarah Scott, MHSc, National Physician Survey and Janus Project Coordinator at The College of Family Physicians of Canada. We thank David Paton, Senior Methodologist, Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), for helpful comments on the manuscript. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of CIHI, the College of Family Physicians of Canada or the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
Table 1. Definition and Examples of Core Public Health Degrees and Certifications and Other Degree Classifications Derived from the National Physician Survey Database, 2004 Credential Definition Examples Core Public Any degree, diploma, MPH, MHSc, MSc Health degree * certificate except (Community baccalaureate that Health & includes in its name Epidemiology), words "public health", Masters of "social medicine", Social Medicine, "community medicine", PhD Public "community health", Health "preventive medicine", "public hygiene" and does not include word "family" AND/OR a professional degree with acronym MPH (Master of Public Health), MHSc (Master of Health Sciences). Community Any certificate that includes Fellowship in Medicine/Public the words Community Medicine Community Health or Public Health, regardless Medicine, certification * of other certifications held. FRCPC (CM) Community Any certificate that includes Medicine-related the words Occupational medicine, certifications Social sciences & humanities in medicine, Aviation/aerospace medicine, Travel/tropical medicine, Environmental medicine, Preventive medicine. Community Health Any degree, diploma, certificate MSc Clinical Sciences-related except baccalaureate that Epidemiology, degree includes Biostatistics, Certificate in Epidemiology, Occupational Occupational (Work) Environmental Health. Health Other health Other health degrees, diplomas, MSc Tropical science degree certificates except Medicine, MSc baccalaureate that includes Health Research the words "health", "medicine". Methodology, MSc Health Sciences Management and Any degree, diploma, certificate PhD (health administration except baccalaureate that policy and degrees includes the words "management", management), "policy" or "administration" or Master in Health the acronyms MPA (Master of Services, MASc Public Administration), MHA Management (Master of Health Sciences, MSc Administration), MHSA Health Policy (Master of Health Services Administration), MBA (Master of Business Administration). Other graduate Any non-baccalaureate degree PhD, DPhil, MSc degree, not not stated above that starts otherwise with M, Ph or includes D. classified Also include graduate diploma but not diploma alone. Degrees not Any degree that begins with B, Unknown, Rdn. applicable to any other certificate or Specialiste, analyses diploma not captured above, or CD, LLB, GP any other response. Other certification. * Individuals with these degrees and certifications were deemed to be qualified as a public health physician. Table 2. Estimated Numbers and Proportions of Canadian Physicians in Canada Who Are Public Health Doctors, by Practice Status Definition of Public Number of Estimated Number (%) by Health Doctor Respondents Public Health Activity, n = 12,762 Weighted for Response Rate (FP/GP,CM, IM, Ped) Active Reserve TOTAL CMA Masterfile = Community Medicine/ Public Health 154 228 (59.7) 154 (40.3) 382 Qualified (public health degree or certification) 240 367 (57.8) 268 (42.2) 635 Credentialed/ [dagger] Qualified (CMA [double Masterfile = Community dagger] Medicine/Public Health OR public health degree or certification) 294 367 (47.7) 402 (52.3) 769 Community Medicine/ Public Health as an area of professional activity 1804 5020 N/A 5020 Definition of Public % of Health Doctor Canadian Physician Workforce N = 59,399 CMA Masterfile = Community Medicine/ Public Health 0.64 Qualified (public health degree or certification) 1.1 Credentialed/ Qualified (CMA Masterfile = Community Medicine/Public Health OR public health degree or certification) 1.3 Community Medicine/ Public Health as an area of professional activity 8.5 ([dagger]) Inclusion of the estimated 65 respondent physicians other than CM, FP/GP, IM, Ped who held public health degrees increases this total to 700 (1.2% of Canadian physician workforce). ([double dagger]) If the estimated 1,873 physicians (other than CM, FP/GP, IM, Ped) who have training/credentials relevant to emergency preparedness are included, the total increases to 2,508 (4.2%). Table 3. Specialties Other Than Community Medicine for Which Training Objectives Relate to Emergency Preparedness/Disaster Planning Specialty Estimated N, General Objective Canada (13,14) Emergency 484 The specialist emergency physician Medicine possesses organizational skills in emergency department and disaster management and the ability to interface with and play a leadership role in the development and organization of the emergency medical services and prehospital care. Infectious 216 * Demonstrate diagnostic and therapeutic Diseases skills for ethical and effective patient care. * Access and apply relevant information to clinical practice. Occupational 47 * Consult effectively with other Medicine physicians and health care professionals. * Contribute effectively to other interdisciplinary team activities. * Work effectively with the workplace parties and government agencies. Pediatric 51 Apply knowledge of the clinical features, Emergency diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, Medicine natural history, pathophysiology, complications and consequences of acute illness and injury in the pediatric population. CCFP-EM 1074 The goal of the College of Family Physicians of Canada in emergency medicine is to improve the standards and availability of emergency care from practicing family physicians. Specialty Specific Requirements Emergency Understand the supervisory and Medicine administrative aspects of Emergency Medical Services systems (i.e., rationalization of Emergency Services, communications systems, prehospital care programs, ambulance services, paramedical emergency services and disaster medicine). Infectious The trainee is expected to have the Diseases appropriate level of knowledge relating to the etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, natural history, pathology, clinical features, prevention and management of ... infections occurring as a result of emerging pathogens and bioterrorism. Occupational Participate in the development of Medicine emergency or disaster plans for the workplace and/or the community. Pediatric Disaster/mass gathering. Emergency Medicine CCFP-EM Understand the principles of the development and implementation of support emergency medical services in the community for prehospital care, (i.e., paramedics, ambulance service, communication systems, first aid programs, poison control, public education, organization of emergency medical services, and disaster planning).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH|
|Author:||Russell, Margaret L.; McIntyre, Lynn|
|Publication:||Canadian Journal of Public Health|
|Date:||May 1, 2009|
|Previous Article:||Assessing Canadian medical students' familiarity with and interest in pursuing a career in community medicine.|
|Next Article:||The limitations of point of care testing for pandemic influenza: what clinicians and public health professionals need to know.|