Printer Friendly

An end to affirmative action? In her new book, law professor Sheryll Cashin pushes for a fresh look at affirmative action.

WASHINGTON, D.C. - It's not surprising that, as a former law clerk to the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall and daughter of civil rights activist parents, Georgetown University law professor Sheryll Cashin supports the use of affirmative action in American higher education.

Rather than defend the practice of race-conscious affirmative action that helps underrepresented minorities gain admission into highly selective colleges and universities, Cashin instead pushes for a form of affirmative action that's based on structural disadvantage, or place, that a student must overcome to attain a high-quality education.

Cashin's new book, Place, Not Race: A New Vision of Opportunity in America, argues that place-based affirmative action provides a race-neutral approach for helping disadvantaged students as well as brings diversity to elite colleges and universities.

While the U.S. Supreme Court in the Fisher v. Texas decision narrowed the legality of using race in college admissions, Place, Not Race offers a vision of how colleges and universities can achieve racial and ethnic diversity while providing opportunity for disadvantaged students regardless of their race or ethnicity.

The argument against

There's little disagreement that the practice of race-conscious affirmative action has been on the decline since the 1990s, as the federal courts have limited its use and states have acted to prohibit public universities from considering race.

Over nearly two decades, the proportion of four-year public colleges that consider race in admissions has fallen from more than 60 percent to about 35 percent. Just 45 percent of private colleges still consider race in admissions.

Cashin contends that race-conscious affirmative action is currently doing little to help the truly disadvantaged in American society. It benefits, she asserts, primarily advantaged Black and Latino students, such as her own children. In the books epilogue, which is in the form

Cashin is a Georgetown University law professor and author of three books. of a personal letter, the former Clinton administration official informs her twin 6-year-old sons that she believes they do not "need or deserve affirmative action" that will consider their race as a factor in college admissions.

"One irony is that race-based affirmative action, as it is practiced in highly selective institutions, really doesn't help the vast majority of Black and Latino students in this country," Cashin said during the recent Lumina Ideas Summit: New Pathways to Higher Education Diversity event.

Many students, "as do most Black and Latino kids in this country, have to overcome serious structural disadvantage" to gain access to and complete college, Cashin explained. "[They] have to overcome serious structural disadvantage, including underresourced schools with less-experienced teachers, fewer higher-achieving peers that raise expectations and model habits of success, and often exposure to violence," she noted.

In addition to its failure to reach disadvantaged Black and Latino students, Cashin argues that race-based affirmative action poses too high a social cost because "it engenders [racial] resentment," particularly among working-class Whites.

"White folks don't like it. And it makes it more difficult to create coherent multiracial coalitions among the people who struggle in this country to support the public policies that will redress these serious savage structural barriers that most children of color face," she said.

In the book, Cashin also makes clear the distinction between place-based and class-based forms of affirmative action. Place-based affirmative action in academic admissions seeks to move beyond the scope of class-based admission practices by taking into account the impact of racial history, such as the persistence of segregation in African-American communities. Cashin writes that "mere consideration of [family] income differences does not adequately reflect the structure of disadvantage in the United States."

"It is not enough to promote affirmative action based upon class rather than race when there is a racialized, separate and unequal K-12 pipeline," she writes.

Proposals that Cashin recommends to bolster place-based affirmative action include making standardized tests optional, replacing merit-based financial aid with need-based financial aid and recruiting high-achieving students from overlooked places.

Joining the national debate

The book's publication in May, which coincided with the 60th anniversary of the landmark Brown v. Board decision, could not have come at a more opportune time. Since the late spring, Cashin has earned a place among those scholars and advocates who are driving the national debate over affirmative action. She has made appearances on network TV news shows, national and local radio programs, a C-SPAN-covered forum and several public events.

In June, Cashin appeared as a guest at the Lumina Ideas Summit, which coincided with the publication of The Century Foundation's The Future of Affirmative Action: New Paths to Higher Education Diversity after Fisher v. University of Texas. The book includes chap ters written by nationally renowned experts such as Dr. Anthony Carnevale, Rutgers University-Newark chancellor Nancy Cantor and Vassar College president Catharine Hill.

Richard Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation and editor of The Future of Affirmative Action, moderated the event. He has been a leading proponent of class-based affirmative action. Through its publication, Kahlenberg wanted to broaden the national conversation on affirmative action, which includes Cashin.

In a review of Place, Not Race published in The New Republic, Kahlenberg praised Cashin for "skillfully blending her personal story as an upper-middleclass Black professional with a wide range of research on what constitute [s] the biggest barriers to success ... Cashin provides a compelling blueprint for a new, much stronger, form of affirmative action based on actual disadvantage."

Kahlenberg's review takes note of the contrast between the affirmative action stance Justice Marshall took in the 1978 Bakke affirmative action decision and that of his former law clerk in her new book. "More than 30 years later, a former Supreme Court clerk to Justice Marshall, [Cashin] makes a powerful case that it's time to rethink her former boss's support for racial preferences," he writes.

Place, Not Race has also drawn praise from Roger Clegg, a longtime opponent of race-conscious affirmative action and the president and general counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity. During an event televised by C-SPAN at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in Washington, D.C., he characterized Place, Not Race as "a courageous book" and that "it does take guts [for a liberal] to say that racial preferences are ... no longer a good idea."

"I won't say I disagree with all of her premises and all of her reasoning, but I disagree with a lot. Nonetheless, I do agree with her conclusion that the time for racial and ethnic preferences is over and we ought to move beyond that," Clegg said.

Although Cashin's colleague, Georgetown law professor Girardeau Spann, strongly defended the use of race-conscious affirmative action during the C-SPAN event, he urged viewers and audience members to read the book.

In describing the early reaction to Place, Not Race, Cashin notes that she occupies unique space on the affirmative action issue by being a product of the civil rights community. Her previous two books, The Agitators Daughter: A Memoir of Four Generations of One Extraordinary African-American Family and The Failures of Integration: How Race and Class are Undermining the American Dream, have emphasized her connection to the civil rights community.

Cashin explains that only in recent years has she come to take the position to support place-based affirmative action over the race-based version. "I wouldn't say there's raging enthusiasm in the traditional civil rights community" about Place, Not Race, she told Diverse.

"I'm part of this community. And my friends in the community are open to the argument," Cashin said. "I think they appreciate where my heart is. They appreciate all of the analysis about the underlying systemic disadvantage."
COPYRIGHT 2014 Cox, Matthews & Associates
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Place, Not Race: A New Vision of Opportunity in America
Author:Roach, Ronald
Publication:Diverse Issues in Higher Education
Article Type:Book review
Date:Jul 17, 2014
Previous Article:Campus closings: leaders confront the thorny issue of closing or merging HBCUs.
Next Article:The presidential seal: the ACE Fellows Program is helping to increase the number of women and minority college presidents.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters