Printer Friendly

An Analysis of Correctional Education GED Essays.

To read the full text of this article, click here: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED476466

Three judges rated General Educational Development (GED) student essays that had been written by nine incarcerated youths. If judge's ratings were not consistent, students would receive a biased average rating. Traditional classical measurement theory computes an intraclass reliability coefficient to determine if judges' ratings are reliable. In contrast, a latent trait measurement theory approach can determine a student's fair average rating adjusted for any bias in the judges ratings. A comparison of these two approaches with this sample indicated that the latent trait approach yielded more useful information for training judges to be more consistent and less biased in rating GED student essays. An appendix contains the scoring guide, computer screen illustrations, and the Rasch measurement programs. (Contains 18 references.) (Author/SLD)

COPYRIGHT 2003 U.S. Department of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Monahan, Michael P.; Schumacker, Randall E.
Publication:ERIC: Reports
Date:Feb 15, 2003
Words:196
Previous Article:Positive Outcomes of Volunteering as a Peer Educator: A Qualitative Study.
Next Article:Testimony and Evidence To Support Small Classes, K-3.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |