Printer Friendly

An American peace in Korea.

WE OFTEN ARE REMINDED that the Korean War ended with an armistice. While that is an irrefutable fact, it is not true that the absence of a formal peace treaty is an impediment to peace in Korea. The signing of such a document between the U.S. and Noah Korea today would not facilitate, let alone guarantee, genuine peace or denuclearization on the Korean peninsula. To believe that it would only can be the result of a fundamental misreading of the Noah Korean regime--in terms of its nature and strategic intent.

It was on July 27, 1953, that the armistice bringing the Korean War to an end was signed. The war concluded without a clear victor and the Korean peninsula divided more or less along the same lines as at the beginning of the conflict on June 25, 1950. Despite the lack of a final resolution, the armistice made possible a long peace in Northeast Asia and planted the seeds of South Korea's freedom and prosperity.

In Noah Korea, on the other hand, July 27 has a different meaning. Pyongyang, its capital city, each year commemorates "the anniversary of the Great Victory of the Korean people in the Fatherland Liberation War." Noah Korea considers it a reminder of the unfinished business of communizing the entire Korean peninsula. The war may have ceased in 1953, but the Noah Korean revolution rages on. This fact helps explain the fundamental geopolitical dynamic on the peninsula.

In this light, consider Noah Korea's repeated demand for a peace treaty with the U.S. What explains its insistence on signing such a piece of paper with its "vanquished" foe? The answer is self-evident: to realize its goal of evicting U.S. forces from South Korea. Ever since Noah Korea joined the World Health Organization in 1973 and opened a diplomatic mission in New York the following year, it has been proposing bilateral peace negotiations with Washington. Of course, this did not stop it from sending assassins to kill South Korea's president, Park Chung Hee, or kidnapping its fishermen.

A peace treaty might be conducive to reconciliation between the two Koreas and stability in the region, but this will be the case only if it does not lead to calls for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from South Korea. What is more likely is that such an agreement would cause all sides (not only Noah Koreans, but South Koreans and Americans, too) to question the need for a continued U.S. presence in Korea, and this would, in turn, advance a top priority of the Noah Korean state: the complete and irreversible removal of U.S. troops from South Korea. Considering the size of Noah Korea's military and its stocks of both conventional and nuclear weapons, the results likely would be disastrous.

Yet, does Korea even matter from a U.S. strategic point of view? Consider the lessons of four other wars in and around Korea in the 60-year period leading up to the mid 20th century: the First Sino-Japanese War (1894-95), First Russo-Japanese War (1904-05), Second Sino-Japanese War (1937-45), and the Pacific War (1941-45). In each of these, Japan was the principal actor, driven by a desire to change the geopolitical setting in its favor. Taken together, these earlier conflicts powerfully reinforce the lesson of the Korean War itself: a power vacuum in Korea is an invitation to aggression.

By defeating China in 1895, Japan won Taiwan as its first colony and effectively ended the centuries-old Chinese world order. By defeating Russia in 1905, Japan won international recognition of its "paramount political, military, and economic interests in Korea," as enshrined in the Treaty of Portsmouth. By 1937, Japan was in full control of its Korean colony and prepared to utilize the peninsula as a supply base and military platform for invading China. Lacking strategic interests in Northeast Asia, the U.S. stood by as Japan gobbled up Korea and advanced into Manchuria. Japan's military successes, though, peaked at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, and it was defeated in August 1945. By then, the geopolitical importance of Korea was not lost on the victorious allies, who partitioned the peninsula at the 38th Parallel.

The U.S., in control of defeated Japan and the southern half of liberated Korea, now emerged as the key shaper of geopolitics in Northeast Asia, but after governing South Korea from 1945-48, and despite lingering misgivings about Noah Korea's intentions, the U.S. began to withdraw troops from the South. By the summer of 1949, it had returned to a policy of benign neglect. At this point, Kim Il Sung--father of the current North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il--took advantage of the power vacuum and launched an invasion of the South.

In the almost 58 years since the armistice, Noah Korea has time and again shown its willingness to take considerable risks to turn the strategic environment in its favor. The sinking of the Cheonan, a South Korean naval ship, in March 2010, and the bombing of a South Korean island eight months later, are but the latest in a long history of deadly attacks. Today, the Noah Korean regime faces its most serious internal political challenges in nearly 20 years: severe economic stresses, the increasing infiltration of information, higher numbers of its citizens attempting to defect to the South, and the challenge of handing over dynastic power from a long-riding father to an unproven son in his 20s.

This uncertain situation presents a rare opportunity for policymakers in Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo to bring about changes in the Noah Korean regime and ensure peace and stability in the region. Engaging the Noah Korean people--rather than the regime--by means of information operations and facilitating defections, while simultaneously constricting Pyongyang's cash flow, is the best means to that end. It also is important for Washington to hold quiet consultations with Beijing to prepare jointly for a unified Korea under Seoul's direction, a new polity that will be free, peaceful, capitalist, and pro-U.S, and -China.

Sung-Yoon Lee is adjunct assistant professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, Medford, Mass., and an associate in research at the Korea Institute at Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. This column is adapted from a speech given at Hillsdale (Mich.) College; transcript courtesy of Imprimis.
COPYRIGHT 2011 Society for the Advancement of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:WORLD WATCHER
Author:Lee, Sung-Yoon
Publication:USA Today (Magazine)
Geographic Code:9SOUT
Date:Mar 1, 2011
Previous Article:Will military cuts endanger the U.S.?
Next Article:Let's put the relations in foreign relations.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters