Printer Friendly

Aluminum: the answer in the safety vs. fuel economy debate?

Every time CAFE standards come up for discussion, the debate over the effect weight and size have on occupant safety comes to the fore. "There is this tendency to equate lightweighting and downsizing," says Mike Bull, director of Automotive Technology, Novelis Corp. (Novi, MI; www.novelis.com), "when they are not the same thing in terms of crash performance." Not wanting to be left out of the twin debates over fuel economy and safety, the Aluminum Association (Troy, MI; www.autoaluminum.org) commissioned a study showing how lightweight materials can preserve vehicle size and safety performance while improving fuel economy. "We want to make sure aluminum isn't left out of the debate by having regulators concentrate on weight as the overriding safety factor like they have done in the past," says Tom Gannon, v.p., Sales and Marketing, Novelis.

After selecting the Ford Explorer as the typical SUV, the team created an aluminum version with the same crash pulse as its steel counterpart by calibrating it against the Explorer's actual NCAP (National Crash Assessment Program) results. Five hundred moderately severe crash scenarios were chosen from available crash data and tests were run and calibrated for each. "This gives an apples-to-apples comparison," says Bull. It also prevents the group from picking only those accident types that put aluminum in the best light.

Nearly 900 lb lighter than its steel counterpart, the virtual Explorer's sheet aluminum unibody accounted for 450 lb of that tally. Secondary weight reductions (lighter suspension pieces, smaller engine, etc.) made up the rest. As expected, fuel economy rose while size and safety were undiminished. The cost of this vehicle, however, also rose higher than the $1/lb automakers are willing to spend to reduce weight. "We realize the first generation of a vehicle like this is going to cost the DEM more," says Bull, "but that number will diminish in successive generations."

Bull also believes the difference can be offset by substituting aluminum for steel in an amount equal to the cost of an alternate powertrain. "Aluminum belongs in that discussion," says Bull, "because it offers many of the same fuel economy benefits, but its advantage is available under all driving conditions and for all powertrains. Unfortunately, it's often overlooked." A study comparing these approaches currently is under consideration.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Gardner Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:automobiles
Comment:Aluminum: the answer in the safety vs. fuel economy debate?(automobiles)
Publication:Automotive Design & Production
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2005
Words:381
Previous Article:Look what's cooking at Dana.
Next Article:Nissan's intelligent plant.
Topics:


Related Articles
Market drives automotive castings to aluminum.
Gas guzzling.
Debate percolates over CAFE Standards. (Spheres of Influence).
Light on its feet. (On Materials).
Casting market focus: auto: the automobile depends on castings, from the engine to the brakes. It also presents a platform for casting design to...
Castings drive fuel efficiency: lightweight castings continue to play an important role in reducing weight and increasing fuel efficiency of vehicles.
The 2005 North American International Auto Show in Detroit saw the introduction of a number of highly efficient cars, including several new...
Info Plant Surveys Automobile Purchase Trends of Chinese Urbanites.
Increased aluminum in automobiles saving weight and fuel consumption.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |