Printer Friendly

All money laundering and financial crimes countries/jurisdictions.

Latvia

Latvia is a growing regional financial center that has a large number of commercial banks with a sizeable nonresident deposit base. Authorities report that the largest source of money laundered in Latvia is tax evasion/fraud. Other sources include financial fraud, smuggling, and public corruption. Some proceeds of tax evasion appear to originate from outside of Latvia. Reportedly, Russian organized crime is active in Latvia, and authorities believe that a portion of domestically obtained criminal proceeds derives from organized crime. Latvia is among the Eastern European emerging economies most affected by the global financial turmoil. A large current account deficit, high external debt, and a very high loan to deposit ratio resulted in loss of access to foreign exchange funding in the second half of 2008. To ease the situation, the Government of Latvia (GOL) sought external financial support and agreed to an international stabilization program.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: Yes

Four special economic zones provide a variety of significant tax incentives for manufacturing, outsourcing, logistics centers, and the transshipment of goods to other free trade zones. These zones are located at the free ports of Ventspils, Riga, and Liepaja, and in the inland city of Rezekne near the Russian and Belarusian borders. Though there have been instances of reported cigarette smuggling in the free trade zones, there have been no confirmed cases of the zones being used for money laundering schemes or by terrorist financiers. The zones are covered by the same regulatory oversight and enterprise registration regulations that exist for non-zone areas.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

In 2004, the GOL criminalized money laundering for all crimes listed in the Criminal Law of the Latvian Republic. Latvia's new anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) law, The Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, has been in force since August 2008, and the GOL updated acts relevant to its enforcement.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Article 195 of Criminal Law has adopted an "all crimes" approach, so all proceeds-generating criminal offenses are considered predicate offenses to money laundering. The Criminal Law is extensive and covers all the categories of predicate offenses included in international standards.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state. gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

Article 88-1 of the Criminal Code, enacted April 28, 2005, criminalizes terrorist financing and meets the United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1373 requirements. The law penalizes the direct or indirect collection or transfer of any type of acquired funds or other property for the purposes of terrorism.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The AML/CFT law states financial institutions must identify all clients, both account holders and those who wish to carry out individual transactions, and report cash transactions based on established thresholds. The Regulations for Enhanced Customer Due Diligence provide additional measures on obtaining further information on beneficiaries. The Regulations also provide minimum requirements for enhanced due diligence at inception of a business relationship with a customer as well as due diligence performed during a business relationship.

Bank records retention: Yes

Entities must retain transaction and identification data for at least five years after ending a business relationship with a client. This five year period can be extended by one year upon the request of the financial intelligence unit (FIU).

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

The AML/CFT law states that, in addition to credit and financial institutions, the law applies to tax advisors, external accountants, sworn auditors, sworn notaries, sworn advocates, other legal professionals in certain capacities, persons acting in the capacity of agents or intermediaries in real estate transactions, organizers of lotteries and gambling, persons providing money collection services, and other legal or natural persons involved in trading real estate, vehicles, items of culture, precious metals, precious stones and articles thereof or other goods. Obligated entities must file a suspicious transaction report (STR) with the FIU if there appears to be laundering or attempted laundering of the proceeds of crime or terrorist financing, based on a list of indicators of suspicious transactions. There are no monetary thresholds for suspicious transactions. In the first nine months of 2009, the FIU received 16,519 STRs. During the same period, the FIU submitted 102 cases for investigation.

Large currency transaction reporting: Yes

Obligated financial entities must report large cash transactions to the FIU. Depending on the situation and the business, the reporting threshold varies from 1000 lats to 40,000 lats (approximately $2,000 $80,000).

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Latvia's Criminal Procedures Law enables law enforcement authorities to identify, trace, freeze, seize and confiscate criminal proceeds derived from all criminal acts, including terrorism and narcotics commerce. The FIU is empowered to issue freezing orders based on bank reports. Latvia does not have a civil forfeiture law. However, under Latvia's Criminal Procedures Law authorities can initiate a forfeiture action for assets recovered during a criminal investigation concurrently with the investigation itself - they do not need to wait until the investigation is complete or a trial begins. Latvia does enforce existing asset seizure and forfeiture laws. In the first nine months of 2009, Latvia froze 6,953,578 Euros (approximately $9,753,000), seized 1,018,343 Euros (approximately $1,400,000), and confiscated 709,453 Euros (approximately $1,000,000).

Narcotics asset sharing authority: Yes

According to Article 785 of the Criminal Procedures Law, the Ministry of Justice has the authority to share seized assets with other governments based on established criteria. The Criminal Procedures Law also establishes a process for responding to the request of a foreign state for the confiscation of property. In 2009, Latvia implemented the European Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA, which establishes the principle of mutual recognition of confiscation orders among EU member states.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: Yes

The AML/CFT law obliges all persons transporting more than 10,000 Euros (approximately $14,000) in cash or monetary instruments between Latvia and any non-EU member state, to complete a written cash declaration form and submit it to a customs officer, or, where there is no customs checkpoint, to a border guard. People moving within the EU are exempt from any declaration requirement. In the first nine months of 2009, the FIU received 150 cash declaration reports.

Cooperation with foreign government: Yes

Article 62 of Latvia's AML/CFT law establishes procedures for exchanging information with foreign governments.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: Yes

In April 2005, the United States outlined concerns in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking against VEF Banka, under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act. The bank was found to lack adequate AML/CFT controls and was used by criminal elements to facilitate money laundering, particularly through shell companies. In August 2006, the United States issued a final rule imposing a special measure against the VEF Banka, as a financial institution of primary money laundering concern. This measure is still in effect.

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

Law enforcement agencies have a heavy workload and their budgets, salaries, and in some cases, personnel have been reduced due to the severe economic crisis. There were 39 criminal investigations, 24 prosecutions against 48 persons, and 3 persons convicted in the first nine months of 2009 on money laundering charges.

In 2009, the Latvian Central Criminal Police concluded a 20-month investigation in which they worked in close concert with other European countries, Ecuador and the United States to target a drug smuggling conspiracy led by a major Latvian organized crime figure.

Authorities report that there has been no significant change in the number of financial crimes over the past year, but the overall monetary value of money laundering may be decreasing due to the economic crisis. Authorities report seeing cases indicating possible trade-based money laundering schemes, but have not brought any such cases to court on money laundering charges.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

Currency transactions involving international narcotics trafficking proceeds do not include significant amounts of United States currency and apparently do not derive from illegal drug sales in the United States. However, U.S. law enforcement agencies have determined that some U.S criminal elements utilize the Latvian financial sector to launder narcotics proceeds.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S:

A Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) has been in force between the United States and Latvia since 1999. Latvia has cooperated with USG law enforcement agencies to investigate numerous financial crimes and narcotics smuggling. The Latvian FIU exchanges information with the U.S. FIU, FinCEN.

International agreements:

Latvia provides mutual legal assistance on the basis of international, bilateral or multilateral agreements to which Latvia is a party. Authorities in Latvia are also able to provide assistance outside of the formal mutual legal assistance process. The Ministry of Interior has concluded several bilateral law enforcement cooperation agreements. The AML/CFT law allows the Latvian FIU to exchange information with any government. Latvia's FIU has bilateral agreements with 20 other FIUs.

Latvia is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Latvia is a member of the Council of Europe Select Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of AntiMoney Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL), a Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-style regional body. The mutual evaluation report of Latvia conducted by MONEYVAL and the International Monetary Fund can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/Countries/Latvia_en.asp

Recommendations:

Despite legislative and regulatory improvements, Latvia still faces significant money laundering threats tied to corruption, organized crime and nonresident account holders. It should continue to implement and make full use of the 2005 amendments to its Criminal Procedures Law and continue to actively implement and vigorously enforce the AML/CFT law. It is also vital that competent authorities be provided adequate resources and staffing to carry out their duties. Latvia should continue to strengthen its risk-based approach to AML/CFT and take steps to further enhance the preventative aspects of its AML/CFT regime, including ensuring effective implementation of customer due diligence requirements and increased scrutiny of higher risk categories of transactions, clients and countries. The GOL should continue to take steps to increase information sharing and cooperation between law enforcement agencies at the working level. The GOL also should work toward increasing its authorities' ability and effectiveness in aggressively prosecuting and convicting those involved in financial crimes.

Lebanon

Lebanon is a financial hub for banking activities in the Middle East and eastern Mediterranean and has one of the more sophisticated banking sectors in the region. Lebanon faces significant money laundering and terrorist financing vulnerabilities. For example, Lebanon has a substantial influx of remittances from expatriate workers and family members, estimated by the World Bank at $7 billion per year. It has been reported that a number of these Lebanese abroad are involved in underground finance and trade-based money laundering (TBML) activities. Laundered criminal proceeds come primarily from foreign criminal activity and organized crime. There is some smuggling of cigarettes and pirated software, but the sale of these goods does not generate large amounts of funds that are then laundered through the formal banking system. There is a black market for stolen cars, counterfeit goods and pirated software, CDs, and DVDs. The domestic illicit narcotics trade is not a principal source of money laundering proceeds.

Offshore Center: Yes

Although offshore banking, trust and insurance companies are not permitted in Lebanon, the government enacted Law No. 19 on September 5, 2008, expanding existing provisions regarding activities of offshore companies and transactions conducted outside Lebanon or in the Lebanese Customs Free Zone. All offshore companies must register with the Beirut Commercial Registrar, and the owners of an offshore company must submit copies of their identifications. Moreover, the Beirut Commercial Registrar maintains a special register, containing all relevant information about offshore companies. Offshore companies can issue bearer shares.

Free Trade Zones: Yes

There are two free trade zones (FTZ) operating in Lebanon: the Port of Beirut and the Port of Tripoli. FTZs fall under the supervision of the Customs Authority. Exporters moving goods into and out of the free zones submit a detailed manifest to Customs. Customs is required to inform the financial intelligence unit (FIU) on suspected TBML or terrorist financing, however, high-levels of corruption within Customs create vulnerabilities for TBML and other threats. Companies using the FTZ must be registered and must submit appropriate documentation, which is kept on file for a minimum of five years.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

In 2001, Lebanon enacted its anti-money laundering (AML) legislation, Law No. 318. This legislation creates a framework for lifting bank secrecy, broadening the criminalization of money laundering, and facilitating access to banking information and records by judicial authorities. Under this law, money laundering is a criminal offense.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Partially

Law No. 318 broadens the criminalization of money laundering beyond narcotics but does not cover all terrorist financing transactions.

Criminalizes terrorist financing:

In 2003, Lebanon also adopted Laws 547 and 553. Law 547 expands Article One of Law No. 318, criminalizing any funds resulting from the financing or contribution to the financing of terrorism or terrorist acts or organizations based on the definition of terrorism as it appears in the Lebanese Penal Code. Such definition does not apply to Hizballah, which is considered a legitimate political party-- represented by members of Parliament and two Cabinet ministers in the current Cabinet--and resistance organization in Lebanon. The widespread view of Hizballah as a legitimate resistance organization, and thus not subject to Lebanese anti-terror financing laws poses a terrorist financing threat.

On October 8, 2008, the Parliament approved Law 32, which expands the scope of investigators' field of inquiry, granting them greater authority to include funds originating from corruption activities into money laundering cases.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

All financial institutions and money exchange houses are regulated by Law No. 318, which clarifies the Central Bank's, Banque du Liban, powers to: require financial institutions to identify all clients, including transient clients; maintain records of customer identification information; request information about the beneficial owners of accounts; conduct internal audits; and, exercise due diligence in conducting transactions for clients.

Bank records retention: Yes

All obligated reporting entities must retain records for five years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Law No. 318 established Lebanon's FIU, the Special Investigation Commission (SIC). The provisions of Law No. 318 expand the type of financial institutions subject to the provisions of the Banking Secrecy Law of 1956, to include institutions such as exchange offices, financial intermediation companies, leasing companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, companies promoting and selling real estate and construction, and dealers in high-value commodities. In addition, Law No. 318 requires companies engaged in transactions for high-value items (i.e., precious metals, antiquities, etc.) and real estate to report suspicious transactions.

Large currency transaction reporting: No

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture: Yes

Lebanese law allows for property forfeiture in civil as well as criminal proceedings. The Government of Lebanon (GOL) enforces existing drug-related asset seizure and forfeiture laws, allowing for the confiscation of assets determined to be related to or proceeding from money laundering or terrorist financing. Vehicles used to transport illegal goods, such as drugs, as well as legitimate businesses established from illegal proceeds are subject to seizure under Law 318. Forfeitures are then transferred to the Lebanese Treasury.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

Lebanon cannot legally return forfeited assets (such as fraud proceeds) to the U.S.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: No

Lebanon has no cross-border currency reporting requirements, presenting a significant cash-smuggling vulnerability.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals): Yes.

The GOL is unable in many cases to assist the United States and others in forfeiture related requests. Lebanon cannot provide forfeiture assistance, legally, to the U.S.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

From January through November- 2009, the SIC investigated 116 cases involving allegations of money laundering, terrorism, and terrorist financing activities. Out of the 116, two were related to terrorist financing. The SIC froze the accounts of 23 individuals and 12 companies totaling approximately $2,751,397. As of November 2009, nine cases were transmitted by the general state prosecutor to the penal judge. However, as of late 2009 there has not been any money laundering convictions.

The SIC circulates to all financial institutions the names of suspected terrorists (individuals) and terrorist organizations on the UNSCR 1267 Sanctions Committee's consolidated list, and the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists designated by the U.S. pursuant to Executive Order 13224, and by the European Union under their relevant respective authorities.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

The U.S. dollar is often used regionally in money laundering and terrorist financing.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

Lebanon does not have a mutual legal assistance agreement with the United States. The SIC cooperates with U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FINCEN); in 2009, the SIC cooperated on corruption cases involving Lebanese and American businessmen regarding contract awards in Iraq.

International agreements:

As of early May 2009, the SIC had signed 21 memoranda of understanding with counterpart FIUs concerning international cooperation.

Lebanon is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--No

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Lebanon is a member of the Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent evaluation will be posted at: www.menafatf. org

Recommendations:

The Government of Lebanon (GOL) should encourage more efficient cooperation between financial investigators and other relevant agencies such as customs, police, and internal security forces. Lebanon should increase efforts to disrupt and dismantle terrorist financing efforts, including Hizballah. The GOL should consider including a promotion offense within its money laundering law and should consider amending its legislation to allow a greater ability to provide forfeiture cooperation internationally and also provide authority for the return of fraud proceeds. There should be more emphasis on linking predicate offenses to money laundering and not an over-reliance on suspicious transaction reports filed by financial institutions to initiate investigations. Lebanese law enforcement authorities should examine domestic ties to the international network of Lebanese brokers and traders that are commonly found in underground finance, trade fraud, and TBML. Existing safeguards do not address the issue of the laundering of diamonds and value transfer through Lebanon directly or by Lebanese buying agents in Africa. Although the number of suspicious transaction reports filed and subsequent money laundering investigations coordinated by the SIC have steadily increased, prosecutions and convictions are still lacking. The GOL should pass legislation to mandate and enforce cross-border currency reporting. The trading of bearer shares of unlisted companies remains a vulnerability, and the GOL should take action to immobilize those shares. Finally, the GOL should become a party to the UN International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Financing.

Lesotho

Lesotho is not a financial center. Authorities do not believe money laundering/terrorist financing occurs in the formal sector. However, there are some financial sector frauds such as those that occur in banks and insurance companies in the form of defrauding of companies and some government departments. It is believed laundered funds are carried across the border as currency. Ostensibly, no transfers are allowed outside the formal financial system; however, in practice, informal money transfer and remittance systems are in use, especially by the growing Chinese community that does not use local banks.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

The Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act 4 of 2008 (MLPCA) was passed in April 2009. This legislation criminalizes money laundering beyond narcotics trafficking. Lesotho uses an "all serious crimes" approach to predicate offenses. The law covers banks, money exchangers, insurance companies, securities firms, and designated non-financial businesses and professions. However, because the law is so new, mechanisms have not yet been put in place to implement these provisions for most entities.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

The MLPCA criminalizes terrorist financing.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

In addition to the MLPCA, the Financial Institutions (Anti-Money Laundering) guidelines of 2000 require financial institutions to establish and maintain specific policies and procedures to guard against the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering.

Bank records retention: Yes

Financial institutions are required to maintain, for a period of ten years, all necessary records to enable them to comply with information requests from competent authorities.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Under Central Bank of Lesotho (CBL) guidelines, banks report suspicious transactions to the CBL. The MLPCA provides for the filing of suspicious transaction reports (STRs) with the new financial intelligence unit (FIU) authorized by the law. The FIU is in the process of being established. The CBL reported it received less than ten STRs in both 2008 and 2009.

Large currency transaction reporting: Yes

The Government of Lesotho (GOL) requires banks to report all transactions exceeding 100,000 maloti (approximately $14,000) to the Central Bank.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

The MLPCA provides for the identification, tracing, freezing, seizure and eventual confiscation of assets and the Central Bank, Police, and the Directorate of Corruption and Economic Offenses (DCEO), through the powers of the attorney general, are responsible to trace, freeze and seize narcotics-related assets. Any assets proved to have been used to facilitate the commission of a serious crime or that are the proceeds of such activity, including bank accounts, can be seized. If the actual assets are not available, substitute payments of a comparable amount can be ordered by the court. Both civil and criminal forfeiture are allowed. There is no independent national system and mechanism for freezing terrorist assets; the government relies on normal court procedures. No assets have been frozen, seized or confiscated as of yearend 2009.

Narcotics asset sharing authority: Yes

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: No

There are no mandatory declaration forms used at border crossings. The new MLPCA will enhance the declaration system and allow for seizure of currency.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

Lesotho is a member of various bodies which seek to fight money laundering, and the law provides for international cooperation.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

There were no arrests, prosecutions or convictions for money laundering or terrorist financing in 2009.

The CBL circulates to financial institutions a list of websites that contain lists of individuals and entities that have been included on the UN 1267 sanctions committee consolidated list of terrorist organizations/financiers.

U.S.-related currency transactions: No

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

There are no specific agreements for the exchange of records with United States authorities.

International agreements:

Lesotho is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Lesotho is a member of the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. It has not yet had a mutual evaluation.

Recommendations:

The adoption of the new anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing legislation in 2009 is a good step forward for Lesotho. The Government of Lesotho should provide the necessary resources to build capacity in all relevant ministries and entities, establish the authorized FIU, and fully implement the new law.

Libya

Libya is not considered to be an important financial center. The Libyan economy depends primarily upon revenues from the oil and gas sector, which constitute over 70 percent of GDP. Libya has a cash-based economy and large underground markets. Libya is a destination and transit point for smuggled goods, particularly alcohol and black market/counterfeit goods from sub-Saharan Africa, Egypt and China. Contraband smuggling includes narcotics, particularly hashish/cannabis and heroin. Libya is not considered to be a production location for illegal drugs, although its geographic position, porous borders and limited law enforcement capacity make it an attractive transit point for illegal drugs. Libya is a transit and destination country for men and women trafficked from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Hawala and informal value transfer networks are present. In general, training and resources are lacking for anti-money laundering awareness and countermeasure implementation. A considerable transition time is anticipated while Libya's banking system is reformed and gradually reintegrated into the international system following the lifting of UN and U.S. sanctions.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: Yes

A Free Trade Zone is located in the city of Misrata, 210 kilometers east of Tripoli. Projects in the free zone enjoy tax and customs exemptions.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Money laundering is illegal in Libya, and terms and penalties are defined in Banking Law No. 2 of 2005 on Combating Money Laundering. Predicate offenses are dealt with under Libya's Penal Code, Criminal Procedures Law, and related supplementary laws.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: No

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Libyan banks are required to record and report the identity of customers for all transactions.

Bank records retention: Yes

Records of all transactions are retained for a considerable (but indeterminate) period, although a lack of computerized records and systems, particularly in remote areas of the country, preclude reliable record keeping and data retrieval.

Suspicious transaction reporting:

Libya's Banking Law No. 1 extends the scope of money laundering controls and penalties to non-banking financial institutions. All entities, either financial or non-financial in nature, are required to report money laundering activity to Libyan authorities under penalty of law. Banking Law No. 2 directs the Central Bank to establish a Financial Information Unit (FIU), Libya's financial intelligence unit.

Large currency transaction reporting:

No information available.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

No information available.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

No information available.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

No information available.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

No information available.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

There is no reliable information on the number of filed suspicious transaction reports or on the scope of prosecutions and convictions.

It is illegal to transfer funds outside of Libya without the approval of the Central Bank. Cash courier operations are in violation of Libyan law. It is estimated that up to ten percent of foreign transfers are made through illegal means (i.e., not through the Central Bank). Between 1.5 and 2 million foreigners are thought to live and work in Libya in violation of immigration laws. Funds transfers by migrant workers (mainly from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia) are difficult for the Libyan government to monitor, particularly transfers by criminal organizations.

Informal hawala money dealers (muhawaleen) exist in Libya, and are often used to facilitate trade and small project finance. Given the poor quality and limited reach of Libya's banking system, Libya's socialist practices, and commercial rivalries among regime insiders that discourage disclosure of income and business transactions, many Libyans and foreigners rely on informal mechanisms for cash payments and transactions. Until the recent revision of the tax code, tax rates of up to 80-90 percent also encouraged off-the-book transactions.

The GOL has demonstrated some willingness to circulate UN and U.S. lists of terrorist entities; however, there are no indications to suggest that the GOL has made any effort to freeze, seize or forfeit assets of suspected terrorists or financiers of terrorism.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There are no indications that currency transactions in Libya involve international narcotics trafficking proceeds or include significant amounts of U.S. currency or currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United States or that otherwise significantly affect the United States.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

No information available.

International agreements:

Libya is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Libya is a member of the Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. It has not yet had a mutual evaluation.

Recommendations:

The Government of Libya (GOL) should enact counter-terrorist financing legislation and adopt anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing policies and programs that adhere to international standards. Libya should continue to modernize its banking sector and adopt procedures that provide full transparency. Tax reform should continue so as to shrink the underground economy. Appropriate entities should become familiar with money laundering and terrorist financing methodologies. In particular, Libyan law enforcement and customs authorities should examine the underground economy, including smuggling networks, and informal value transfer systems. The GOL should continue measures aimed at combating corruption in government and commerce. The GOL should endeavor to provide statistics on the number of money laundering investigations, prosecutions, and convictions.

Liechtenstein

The Principality of Liechtenstein has a well-developed offshore financial services sector, liberal incorporation and corporate governance rules, relatively low tax rates, and a tradition of strict bank secrecy. All of these conditions significantly contribute to the ability of financial intermediaries in Liechtenstein to attract both licit and illicit funds from abroad. Liechtenstein's financial services sector includes 15 banks, three non-bank financial companies, 16 public investment companies, 163 insurance and reinsurance companies, 401 trust companies and 27 fund management companies with approximately 360 investment funds. The three largest banks control 90 percent of the market.

In recent years the Principality has made continued progress in its efforts against money laundering. On March 12, 2009, the Liechtenstein Government recognized the OECD standard as the global standard in tax cooperation and as a result renegotiated a series of Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) to include administrative assistance on tax evasion cases.

Offshore Center: Yes

Liechtenstein has a well-developed offshore financial services sector. Liechtenstein's 392 licensed fiduciary companies and 60 lawyers serve as nominees for or manage more than 75,000 entities (mostly corporations or trusts) available primarily to nonresidents of Liechtenstein. Approximately one-third of these entities hold controlling interests in separate entities chartered outside of Liechtenstein. Laws permit corporations to issue bearer shares.

Free Trade Zones: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Narcotics-related money laundering is criminalized through Article 165 of Liechtenstein's Criminal Code, the Stafgesetzbuch (StGB).

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Money laundering is criminalized through Article 165 StGB. Article 1.6 was added in 2003 making terrorism financing a predicate offense for money laundering. In December 2008, the Liechtenstein Parliament passed a new legislative package which includes a comprehensive revision of the Due Diligence Act (DDA) as well as selected amendments to the Criminal Code. These changes also implement the Third European Union (EU) Money Laundering Directive, as well as the EU Directive regarding "politically exposed persons" (PEPs). On December 1, 2009, Liechtenstein adopted amendments to the Criminal Code to include document fraud, environmental crimes and market manipulation as predicate offenses for money laundering.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

In addition to making terrorist financing a predicate offense for money laundering, Liechtenstein created a new Sanctions Act that improves the legal basis for enhanced cooperation with international organizations and foreign countries in the implementation of sanctions. For this purpose, on March 1, 2009, the Law on the Enforcement of International Sanctions (new Sanctions Act) was passed. The law implements new articles of the Criminal Code to punish financial supporters of a terrorist group, list terrorist offenses, and address terrorist financing. The revised Article 278d explicitly criminalizes financing of individual terrorists in order to correct an identified deficiency. There have been no terrorist financing cases to date.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The DDA, as revised in December 2008, defines the scope, requirements, and supervision of customer due diligence procedures, and provides for enforcement and information sharing. The legal requirements are expanded and specified in the Government's Due Diligence Ordinance (DDO). The DDA and DDO were revised in March 2009. Know Your Customer requirements apply to banks, finance companies, e-money institutions, asset management companies, investment undertakings, and insurance undertakings, as well as to the Liechtenstein Postal Service AG, exchange offices, and branches or establishments of foreign financial institutions. The DDA prohibits banks and postal institutions from maintaining bearer-payable passbooks, accounts, and deposits.

Bank records retention: Yes

In accordance with the DDA and DDO, transaction-related records and receipts must be kept by persons subject to the DDA for at least ten years from the conclusion of the transaction or from their preparation.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Liechtenstein's FIU, the Einheit fuer Finanzinformationen (EFFI), receives, analyzes and disseminates suspicious transaction reports (STRs) relating to money laundering and terrorist financing. The STR requirement applies to banks, insurers, financial advisers, postal services, exchange offices, attorneys, financial regulators, casinos, and other entities. In 2008, the EFFI received 189 STRs. STRs mostly involved suspected fraud offenses (103), followed by money laundering (31). Three and a half percent of the beneficial owners were U.S. nationals. Information regarding the number of STRs received in 2009 is not yet available.

Large currency transaction reporting: No

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture: Yes

Liechtenstein has legislation to seize, freeze, and confiscate assets. Criminal seizure and confiscation of laundered assets are covered under article 20b Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code (as amended).

The overall amount of funds frozen in compliance with UNSCR 1267 is currently 90,200 Swiss Francs.

Narcotics asset sharing authority: Yes

Article 253a of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the sharing of confiscated assets.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: No

Cooperation with foreign governments:

No known impediments exist to cooperation.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues/comments:

Liechtenstein's crime rate is low with 1075 crimes recorded in 2007, of which 550 were economic crimes. The major criminal offenses recognized by authorities as predicate offenses for money laundering are fraud, criminal breach of trust, asset misappropriation, embezzlement, fraudulent bankruptcy, corruption and bribery. There have been only two prosecutions in Liechtenstein for autonomous money laundering and no convictions.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information provided.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The United States and Liechtenstein entered into a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) in 2003. Both countries signed a Tax Information Exchange Agreement (TIEA) in December 2001. The U.S. Department of Justice has acknowledged Liechtenstein's cooperation in the Al-Taqwa Bank case and in other fraud and narcotics cases.

International agreements:

Liechtenstein is a party to various information exchange agreements with countries in addition to the United States. The EFFI is able to share information with other FIUs without the need of a memorandum of understanding (MOU). However, for those countries that do require such an agreement in order to share information, Liechtenstein is open to negotiating a MOU; Liechtenstein currently has 13 MOUs in place.

When the European Union-Schengen agreement, signed by Liechtenstein in 2008, actually enters into force the government will grant comprehensive legal assistance in cases of direct and indirect tax fraud. As a consequence of the Schengen System, Liechtenstein and Switzerland negotiated a new border treaty regarding the legal mandate of the Swiss Border Guard that has been provisionally applied since December 12, 2008. The new treaty allows the Liechtenstein Police to delegate to the Swiss Border Guards the authority to control cash couriers on Liechtenstein territory.

Liechtenstein is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--No

Liechtenstein is a member of the Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL), a Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/Evaluations/round3/ MONEYVAL(2007)20Rep-LIE3-I_en.pdf

Recommendations:

While the Government of Liechtenstein has made progress in addressing the shortcomings in its anti-money laundering regime, more remains to be done. The GOL should prohibit the issuance and use of corporate bearer shares and establish the criminal liability of corporate entities. Liechtenstein also should expand its list of predicate offenses to ensure all appropriate crimes are addressed. The EFFI should have access to additional financial information related to STRs. Liechtenstein also should consider creating a national terrorist list, which would allow for the implementation of UNSCRs that do not include a list, such as UNSCR 1373. While Liechtenstein recognizes the rights of third parties and protects uninvolved parties in matters of confiscation, the government should distinguish between bona fide third parties and others. Liechtenstein should enact cross-border and large currency transaction reporting requirements. Finally, the GOL should become a party to the UN Convention against Corruption.

Lithuania

Lithuania is not a regional financial center. Lithuania has adequate legal safeguards against money laundering; however, its geographic location makes it a target for smuggled goods and tax evasion. The sale of narcotics does not generate a significant portion of money laundering activity in Lithuania. Value added tax (VAT) fraud is one of the biggest sources of illicit income, through underreporting of goods' value. Most financial crimes, including VAT embezzlement, smuggling, illegal production and sale of alcohol, capital flight, and profit concealment, are tied to tax evasion by Lithuanians. According to the Financial Crime Investigation Service (FCIS), attempts to use the Lithuanian banking system in money laundering activities related to cyber and organized crimes have increased. Experts anticipate that smuggling into Lithuania will increase after its adoption of the minimum European Union (EU) excise rate in September 2009. According to a survey conducted by the Lithuanian Free Market Institute, the shadow economy will account for approximately 23 percent of the total gross domestic product of Lithuania in 2009 and will make up approximately 27 percent of the entire economy in 2010. There are no reports of public corruption contributing to money laundering or terrorist financing. There is also no evidence that terrorist financing is taking place in Lithuania.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: Yes

Lithuania has Free Economic Zones (FEZ) in the cities of Klaipeda and Kaunas. As of yearend 2009, there are 20 businesses operating in the Klaipeda FEZ, and eight in the Kaunas FEZ. The companies operating in the zones have the same accounting and identification responsibilities as those operating outside the zones. Lithuania's EU accession agreement permits the indefinite operation of existing free trade zones, but precludes the establishment of new ones.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

The Government of Lithuania (GOL) criminalized the act of money laundering in 1997 with the Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering (LPML), which entered into force in 1998.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Article 216 of the Criminal Code, passed on May 1, 2003 defines a money launderer and includes coverage of self laundering. On January 24, 2008, the law on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention (MLTFP) came into force. The goal of the new law was to amend existing legislation to agree with a number of EU directives and regulations. It specifies definitions for money laundering, and terrorist financing; expands the list of covered entities and defines beneficial owner and politically exposed persons. In 2008, the GOL also adopted four legal acts necessary for the implementation of the MLTFP.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

The MLTFP criminalizes terrorist financing. The Criminal Code prescribes a penalty of imprisonment for crimes related to terrorist financing.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention Law (MLTFPL) requires all financial institutions and other entities to perform customer due diligence and establishes guidelines for simplified and complex due diligence. For transactions exceeding 15,000 EUR (approximately $22,180), the MLTFP requires all financial institutions to collect information on the identity of the customer. The law also mandates that life insurance firms and insurance brokers establish the identity of the customer and the insured person, if the amount payable annually by the customer is in excess of 1,000 EUR (approximately $1,478) or the installment amount payable at a time exceeds 2,500 EUR (approximately $3,696). In addition, the law requires casinos to register all patrons who wager, win, or exchange currency for chips. Bearer shares are not restricted by Lithuanian legislation.

Bank records retention: Yes

Under the implementing acts for the MLTFPL, additional requirements for record keeping are provided, for individual and multiple interrelated financial operations, usual and suspicious operations, internal and external remittances, single exchanges of cash from one to another currency, etc. For transactions exceeding 15,000 EUR (approximately $22,180), the MLTFPL requires all financial institutions to maintain customer identification documents for a minimum of ten years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

The MLTFPL includes regulations for reporting on unusual and suspicious transactions. In the first nine months of 2009, the FCIS received 190 suspicious transaction reports (STRs). In 2008, FCIS received 199 STRs. FCIS reported, in the first nine months of 2009, it conducted nine pre-trial investigations for money laundering in comparison to ten in 2008. There were no reports on terrorist financing.

Large currency transaction reporting:

The MLTFPL requires financial institutions to submit to the FCIS information about the following transactions: (1) when the total amount of the customer's transfer in cash or of several interrelated transfers in cash exceeds 15,000 EUR (approximately $22,180), or the corresponding amount in foreign currency; (2) when cash exchanges exceed 6,000 EUR (approximately $8,872), or the corresponding amount in foreign currency; or, (3) when performing internal or international remittance transfer services in amounts in excess of 600 EUR (approximately $887), or the corresponding amount in foreign currency. During the first nine months of 2009, FCIS received over 600,000 reports on cash operations in compliance with the MLTFPL. There were over 1 million reports in 2008.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Article 216 of the Code increases the role of prosecutors. Previously, the police could freeze/seize assets on their own authority, but now they must go to prosecutors with the named property and receive authority to freeze/seize the assets of a suspected crime. The court can only seize property which the criminal or accomplice used as an instrument of a crime or a means to commit a crime or which was acquired as the direct result of a criminal act. In the first nine months of 2009, FCIS froze assets worth 70 million LTL (approximately $29 million). In 2008, FCIS froze assets worth 69 million LTL (approximately $25 million). There are no figures available for the total value of forfeited crime-related assets.

Narcotics asset sharing authority: No

Lithuania does not share crime-related assets with other governments.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

Individuals who enter Lithuania from a non-EU country or depart Lithuania to a non-EU country must declare to Customs cash they transport into or out of the country in excess of 10,000 EUR (approximately $14,786).

Cooperation with foreign governments:

There are no known impediments to cooperation. Lithuanian law enforcement cooperates with the United States in investigations and the exchange of information related to money laundering, financial crimes, terrorist financing and customs issues.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

According to police statistics, in the first ten months of 2009 there were 4,904 financial crimes in Lithuania in comparison to 2,868 in 2008. In the first nine months of 2009, Lithuania registered five criminal cases under Article 216 of the Criminal Code in comparison to seven in 2008. Two of the five cases were adjudicated. One person was convicted in one case; in the other case, the individual(s) were either not convicted or convicted under other statutes. The National Court Administration registered two cases under Article 250 (Act of Terrorism) in 2009. One case was adjudicated but there were no convictions for terrorist financing.

The State Security Department (VSD), the lead GOL agency coordinating efforts against terrorism, and the FCIS circulate to financial institutions the names of all terrorist individuals and entities on the UNSCR 1267 Sanctions Committee's consolidated list, and the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists designated by the United States pursuant to Executive Order 13224.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

There is a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) between the United States and Lithuania, which entered into force in 1999.

International agreements:

Lithuania and Germany signed an agreement in 2001 to cooperate in the fight against organized crime and terrorism. FCIS signed four agreements in 2004 covering cooperation against economic and financial crimes, money laundering, and the exchange of information with the European Anti-Fraud Office, the Azerbaijan Revenue Service, the Italian Guarda Di Finanza and the Estonian Tax and Customs Board. In September 2009, FCIS signed a protocol on cooperation with the Russian Federation. The GOL has signed memoranda on the exchange of money laundering-related financial and intelligence information with the financial intelligence units (FIUs) of Belgium, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Portugal, Finland, Latvia, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Ukraine, Moldova and Poland.

Lithuania is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Lithuania is a member of the Council of Europe's Select Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures (MONEYVAL), a Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/Countries/Lithuania_en.asp

Recommendations:

The Government of Lithuania has a comprehensive anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing regime and should continue to enhance its laws and regulations as necessary to adhere to international standards.

Luxembourg

Despite its standing as the second-smallest member of the European Union (EU), Luxembourg is one of the largest financial centers in the world. While Luxembourg is not a major hub for illicit narcotics distribution, the size and sophistication of its financial sector create opportunities for money laundering, tax evasion, and other financial crimes.

Offshore Center: Yes

Luxembourg is an offshore financial center. Although there are a handful of domestic banks operating in the country, the majority of banks registered in Luxembourg are foreign subsidiaries of banks in Germany, Belgium, France, Italy, and Switzerland.

Free Trade Zone: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Money laundering is criminalized by Article 506 of the Penal Code and by Article 8-1 of the Law on the Sale of Medicinal Substances and the Fight against Drug Addiction.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

The law of August 11, 1998 establishes a general money laundering offense linked to an extensive list of offenses, including narcotics trafficking. The provisions of this law are codified in article 506 of the Penal Code. This article has been amended on several occasions, most recently by the law of July 17, 2008 on the Fight against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism which incorporates the requirements of the Third EU Money Laundering Directive. On November 10, 2009, the GOL adopted a law on payment services which applies to money laundering related to phone banking cases.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

The Law of August 12, 2003 on the suppression of terrorism and its financing criminalizes terrorist financing and inserts into the Penal Code a new chapter on terrorist financing (Articles 135-1 to 135-8). It should be noted that, Luxembourg's criminalization of terrorist financing is not complete in that the legal definition covers financing only if it is intended for commission of an act of terrorism, even if the funds have not actually been used for that purpose. The financing of individual terrorists or terrorist groups beyond the commission of terrorist acts is not criminalized. Also, the notion of terrorist group does not apply to acts committed by two persons.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The law imposes strict know your customer (KYC) requirements on obligated entities for all customers, including beneficial owners, trading in goods worth at least euro 15,000 (approximately $20,250). If the transaction or business relationship is remotely based, the law details measures required for customer identification. Entities must proactively monitor their customers for potential risk. The entities subject to KYC regulations include banks, pension funds, insurance brokers and providers, undertakings for collective investment (UCIs), management companies, external auditors, accountants, notaries, lawyers, casinos, gaming establishments, real estate agents, tax and economic advisors, dealers in high-value goods such as jewelry and vehicles, and domiciliary agents.

Bank records retention: Yes

Financial institutions are required to retain records for at least five years. Additional commercial rules require certain bank records to be kept for up to ten years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Luxembourg's financial intelligence unit (FIU), Cellule de Renseignement Financier, receives and analyzes STRs from all obligated entities.

Large currency transaction reporting: No

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Luxembourg law allows for criminal forfeitures. Narcotics-related proceeds are pooled in a special fund to invest in anti-drug abuse programs. Luxembourg can confiscate funds found to be the result of money laundering even if they are not the proceeds of a crime. The GOL can, on a case-by-case basis, freeze and seize assets, including assets belonging to legitimate businesses used for money laundering.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

There is no specific co-ordination mechanism, fund, or procedure in place for sharing seized assets with other jurisdictions. Since its creation in 1992, the Central Office for Combating Drug Trafficking has been the government body in charge of narcotics asset sharing with foreign jurisdictions, including the United States. This Office is in charge of managing narcotics assets.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: Yes

Travelers entering or leaving the EU and carrying any sum equal to or exceeding euro 10,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies or easily convertible assets) are required to make a declaration to the customs authorities. Luxembourg does not have declaration requirements for those crossing its borders to another EU country.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals):

Luxembourg cooperates with, and provides assistance to foreign governments in their efforts to trace, freeze, seize and forfeit assets. However, in most cases, international cooperation is hampered due to Luxembourg's requirement for dual criminality as a condition for granting mutual legal assistance, as well as a minimum penalty threshold for responding favorably to requests. There were no U.S.-Luxembourg cooperation initiatives in 2009.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

The GOL actively disseminates to its financial institutions information concerning suspected individuals and entities on the UNSCR 1267 Sanctions Committee's consolidated list and the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists designated by the United States pursuant to Executive Order 13224. Luxembourg's authorities can and do take action against groups targeted through both the UN and EU designation processes. However, Luxembourg does not have legal authority to independently designate terrorist groups or individuals.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There are no significant U.S. currency transactions on Luxembourg territory.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The United States and Luxembourg entered into a mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) in 2001. On May 20, 2009, Luxembourg and the United States of America signed a Protocol amending the existing Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Luxembourg for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to taxes on Income and Capital. This Protocol provides for information exchange and allows the United States Government to be given banking information of U.S. Citizens with financial accounts in Luxembourg upon request, on a case by case basis.

International agreements:

Luxembourg is a party to various information exchange agreements with countries in addition to the United States. Authorities can share information or provide assistance to foreign jurisdictions in matters relating to money laundering or other financial crimes without need for a treaty.

Luxembourg is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Luxembourg is a member of the Financial Action Task Force. It has not yet had a mutual evaluation.

Recommendations:

With regard to the criminalization of terrorist financing, significant shortcomings exist. The Government of Luxembourg (GOL) should take steps to adequately criminalize money laundering and terrorist financing in a manner consistent with relevant international Conventions in order to cover all conduct cited by those instruments. The scarce number of financial crime cases is of concern, particularly for a country that has such a large financial sector. The GOL should take action to delineate in legislation regulatory, financial intelligence, and prosecutorial AML/CFT activities among governmental entities. The situation is most acute regarding the lack of a distinct legal framework for the FIU whose staff, activities, and authorities are divided among at least four different ministries. The State Prosecutors in the FIU should be exempt from nonfinancial crime duties, and the FIU should increase the number of analytical staff to effectively analyze and disseminate the volume of STRs it receives. The GOL should pass legislation creating the authority for it to independently designate those who finance terrorism as it would be well served to have such authority. The GOL also should enact legislation to address the continued use of bearer shares. The GOL should continue its efforts to assist jurisdictions with nascent or immature AML/CFT regimes.

Macau

Macau, a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China (PRC), is not a significant regional financial center. Macau's financial system consists of banks and insurance companies that offer traditional products and services to the local population. However, Macau's gaming and tourist industries attract millions of visitors yearly, mostly from mainland China, and continue to stimulate an unprecedented and rapid economic expansion. Because of the large gaming sector patron flows from abroad, Macau could be used as a hub to launder and remit criminal proceeds. To date, there is no evidence indicating Macau's financial institutions engage in currency transactions involving international narcotics trafficking proceeds. Money laundering in Macau does not appear to be related to proceeds from illegal narcotics, psychotropic substances, and chemical precursors. The primary sources of criminal proceeds in Macau are financial fraud and illegal gambling. Criminal networks spanning across Macau's border with mainland China account for much of the criminal activity.

Offshore Center: Yes

Offshore finance businesses, including credit institutions, insurers, underwriters, and offshore trust management companies, are regulated and supervised by the Monetary Authority. Profits derived from offshore activities are fully exempted from all forms of taxes.

Free Trade Zone: No

Macau is a free port without free trade zones.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Decree Law No. 17/2009 criminalizes the illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Law No. 2/2006 (Prevention and Repression of Crime of Money Laundering) and Law No. 3/2006 (Prevention and Repression of Crimes of Terrorism) were both adopted to strengthen Macau's anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework. Macau's laws apply to all serious crimes including terrorism and terrorist financing. Macau

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

In April 2006, Macau adopted Law No. 3/2006 for the "Prevention and Repression of Terrorist Crimes." Article 7 of Law No. 3/2006 defines and criminalizes terrorist financing. Terrorism and terrorist financing are predicate offenses of money laundering.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The Financial System Act and Administrative Regulation No. 7/2006 provide a legal basis for identification of customers of credit and financial institutions. Additionally, the "Guidelines for Financial Institutions" details when financial institutions should exercise customer due diligence. Macau's AML/CFT controls apply to non-bank financial institutions and designated nonfinancial businesses and professions, such as casinos, gaming intermediaries, remittance agents and money changers (RAMCs), cash couriers, trust and company service providers, realty services, pawn shops, traders in goods of high unit value (e.g., jewels, precious metals, vehicles, etc.), notaries, registrars, commercial offshore service institutions, lawyers, auditors, accountants, and tax consultants.

Banks and other financial institutions are required to know and record the identity of customers engaging in significant transactions. In July 2009, Macau's Monetary Authority strengthened its AML/CFT Guidelines for RAMCs, and for banks and other financial institutions (excluding the insurance sector), including identification verification procedures for personal and corporate customers. These revised guidelines also enhance customer due diligence (CDD) measures for dealing with trust, nominee and fiduciary accounts or client accounts opened by professional intermediaries; non-face-to-face customers; politically exposed persons (PEPs); fund transfers; and correspondent banking.

Bank records retention: Yes

Financial institutions, including credit institutions and RAMCs, must record transactions exceeding $2,500 (MOP 20,000) and cross-border wire transfers/remittances over $1,000 (MOP 8,000). Financial institutions and RAMCs must retain records for a minimum of five years from the date of transaction. Financial institutions must also maintain customer account files, including identification data and business correspondence, for at least five years after termination of a business relationship.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

The legal requirements that obligate reporting institutions to identify, record, and report STRs are embedded in Law No. 2/2006; Law No. 3/2006; and Administrative Regulation No. 7/2006. Additionally, Section 5 of "The Guideline on large cash transactions" issued by the Monetary Authority of Macau requires financial institutions to establish monitoring systems for high-risk cash transactions (those equal to or exceeding MOP/HKD 250,000 (approximately $31,250) or equivalent). In 2009, Macau's financial intelligence unit (FIU) received 1,156 STRs. Of these, the FIU submitted 20 referrals to law enforcement for additional action.

Large currency transaction reporting: No

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

The seizure of criminal proceeds is provided for in Articles 163 to 171 of the Criminal Procedure Code, while the forfeiture of criminal proceeds is provided for in Article 101 to 104 of the Criminal Code. Decree Law No. 17/2009, Article 29 (Prohibition of production, trafficking and consumption of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances) replaces Decree Law No. 5/91/Mand specifically provides for the forfeiture of assets related to narcotics trafficking or production. In 2009, Macau seized approximately $736,000 in money laundering-related assets; in 2008, Macau seized approximately $8.7 million in money laundering-related assets and approximately $15,300 in narcotics-related assets, all for crimes committed in 2007.

Narcotics asset sharing authority: Yes

Law No. 6/2006 establishes Macau's legal cooperation regime in criminal matters. Article 29 outlines the possibility for the sharing of seized assets given an agreement with other governments on a case-by-case basis.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: No

Currently, Macau has neither a declaration system nor a disclosure system in place.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals): Yes

Currently Macau lacks legal procedures to facilitate the freezing of assets. As a result, Macau is unable to assist foreign jurisdictions in matters pertaining to the freezing of assets. Macau is able to request and offer mutual legal assistance in criminal matters even if no bilateral agreement exists between the Macau SAR and the requesting jurisdiction based on the principle of reciprocity. The Macau Government has not refused to cooperate with the USG, or with any other governments, to the best of our knowledge.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

In August 2006, Macau's Chief Executive established Macau's FIU as a three-year, non-permanent government department under Macau's Secretary for Economy and Finance. This method of establishment was employed to expedite the setup of the FIU given that the legislative process amounts to years of negotiation. On July 14, 2009, Macau's Chief Executive extended the FIU's term until August 7, 2012. The international community is of the opinion that the GIF is viewed by the Macau SAR Government as an essential component of the long-term infrastructure of the Government.

Although Macau's criminal legal framework does not contain references to a freezing mechanism, the Monetary Authority's AML/CFT Guidelines obligate financial institutions to identify and freeze suspect bank accounts or transactions. Despite these due diligence procedures, Macau cannot provide mutual legal assistance on AML/CFT under existing legislation.

Macau publishes the list of individuals and entities designated by the UNSCR 1267 Committee in Macau's Official Gazette. Additionally, the Monetary Authority circulates the list to all financial institutions operating in Macau. As of November 2009, Macau had not received evidence which led it to identify, freeze, seize, and/or forfeit terrorist-related assets.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

Macau has no formal law enforcement cooperation agreements with the United States, though informal cooperation between the two routinely takes place. The FIU became a member of the Egmont Group in May 2009, which provides a platform for FinCEN and Macau's FIU to exchange financial intelligence.

International agreements:

Macau currently has mutual legal assistance agreements (MLAA) with Portugal and East Timor, and is negotiating MLAA with Cape Verde, Brazil, and Mongolia. Authorities can share information or provide assistance to foreign jurisdictions in matters relating to money laundering or other financial crimes without need for a treaty. The FIU has memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with the FIUs in Portugal, mainland China, the Hong Kong SAR, Korea, Indonesia, Japan and The Philippines.

In the financial sector, Macau's Monetary Authority has signed several MOUs for cross-border supervision and information sharing with regulatory authorities in China, the Hong Kong SAR, Portugal Cape Verde, Mozambique, Angola, Brazil, Australia, and Sao Tome and Principe.

Macau is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes *

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes *

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes *

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes *

Macau is a member of the Financial Action Task Force-style regional body Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG). Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.apgml.org/documents/docs/17/Macao%20ME2%20-%20FINAL.pdf

Recommendations:

Macau has made considerable efforts to develop an AML/CFT framework that meets international standards. However, the Macau Government still needs to make further improvements. It should enhance its ability to implement and enforce existing laws and regulations. Specifically, it should ensure that regulations, structures, and training are adequate to prevent money laundering in the gaming industry, including appropriate oversight of VIP rooms and junket operators. Macau should continue raising AML/CFT public awareness and strengthen interagency coordination and training. It should institutionalize its FIU by making it a permanent body, dedicate additional manpower resources to AML/CFT investigations, enforcement, and cross-border interdiction, and establish a cross-border bulk currency movement detection and declaration system. Additionally, Macau should enhance its ability to support international efforts pertaining to the freezing and seizing of illicit funds by developing its legal framework to facilitate the freezing and seizure of assets.

* In ratifying the above Conventions, China in each case specified that the treaty would apply to the Macau SAR. The Conventions are implemented through local ordinance.

Macedonia

Macedonia is not a regional financial center. A small portion of money laundering activity may be connected to narcotics trafficking. There is no evidence that narcotics trafficking organizations or terrorist groups control money laundering. Money laundering in Macedonia is mostly connected to financial crimes such as tax evasion, smuggling, financial and privatization fraud, insurance fraud, bribery, and corruption. The Macedonian courts levied criminal charges against several high level government officials for misuse of their official positions under the organized crime and corruption statute. Most of the laundered proceeds come from domestic criminal activities.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: Yes

There are a few operational free trade zones in Macedonia, but all of them function as industrial zones within which some industrial production has the legal right to receive the benefits of a free trade zone. The production facilities enjoying these benefits are owned by foreign investors. The GOM is trying to attract more foreign investment by leasing out four large free trade zones. Identification requirements for companies and individuals using the zones are in place, and they are no different from requirements for other companies outside the zones, governed by the existing Trade Companies Law.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering:

Macedonia's Criminal Code, which came into force in 1996 and was last amended on September 10, 2009, criminalizes any form of money laundering and terrorist financing. The legislation specifically identifies narcotics and arms trafficking as predicate offenses and contains an additional provision that covers funds acquired from other punishable actions.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related:

The 2008 Law on Preventing Money Laundering and Other Proceeds of Crime and Terrorism Financing (LPMLTF) does not list specific crimes as predicate offenses, instead choosing to take an "all serious crimes" approach with no minimum threshold for sentencing.

Criminalizes terrorist financing:

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

The LPMLTF provides a definition of terrorist financing that is in accordance with the 1999 International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorism. Parliament adopted amendments to the terrorism provisions in the Criminal Code that increase sentences and criminalize offenses committed by terrorist organizations, including terrorist financing. Draft legislation being circulated within the government will address the financing of individual terrorists.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The LPMLTF requires financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions such as exchange offices, stock brokerages, insurance companies, audit and accounting companies, notaries, attorneys at law, and casinos to identify, report, and keep track of clients performing those transactions subject to reporting requirements.

Bank records retention: Yes

Banks and other financial institutions are required to maintain records necessary to trace significant transactions for up to ten years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

All entities covered by the LPMLTF must file suspicious transaction reports (STRs) with the financial intelligence unit (FIU). From January to October 2009, the FIU received 227 STRs compared with 89 during the same period in 2008. The FIU has submitted 27 reports and 96 notifications of suspicious transactions to relevant state institutions for further investigation. In 2009, the FIU sent two money laundering cases to the Public Prosecutor's Unit for Organized Crime and Corruption for further investigation and filing of criminal charges. In one of the cases, the FIU froze approximately $200,000.

Large currency transaction reporting: Yes

Under the LPMLTF covered institutions must report all cash transactions exceeding 15,000 euros (approximately $21,000). From January to October 2009, the FIU received 72,854 large cash transaction reports.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

In September 2009, parliament adopted asset forfeiture and amendments to the Criminal Code, which created the possibility for a five-year window for asset forfeiture for offenders of serious and organized crime, particularly narcotics traffickers, terrorism financers, and money launderers. In addition, this law also contains provisions for confiscation from third parties and family members. The Criminal Code allows for substitute assets to be seized. The Agency for Management of Seized Property was established in March 2009. According to the LPMLTF, financial institutions can temporarily freeze assets of suspected money launderers and terrorist financiers prior to receiving a court order.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

With the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism in March 2009, the country can share seized assets with other governments.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

The Law on Foreign Exchange Operations requires the Customs Administration to register and report the cross-border transport of currency or monetary instruments in amounts that exceed 10,000 euros. Mandatory declaration forms are used at border crossings. The Customs Administration also has the authority to temporarily seize foreign and domestic currency at border crossings in cases where legal regulations have been violated. From January to October 2009, the Customs Administration sent 821 reports to the FIU on cross-border transport of cash that exceeded the reporting limit.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals):

In 2004, the Macedonian Parliament ratified the Second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe's Convention on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters. Macedonia has concluded a number of Police Cooperation Agreements with most countries in the region (Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania, Slovenia, Austria, Turkey, Greece, Russia, Ukraine, Egypt, and Kosovo). Macedonia also provides law enforcement information in connection with requests from other countries with which it lacks a formal information exchange mechanism. In 2009, the FIU cooperated with FinCEN on a money laundering case that derived from an investor scam in the US and also involved the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Macedonian SEC. Macedonian authorities detained one person, suspected to have laundered about $30 million, and informed FinCEN, which was also working on the case in the US.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

The LPMLFT excludes from the list of covered entities dealers of arts, antiques, and other high-valued consumer goods; entities dealing with jewelry and precious metals; and travel agencies.

Covered non-bank businesses and professions are to be inspected by the Public Revenues Office (PRO). However, in practice such inspections rarely occur, as PRO is focused on tax evasion.

In 2002, Macedonia established a Financial Police Unit (FPU) tasked with investigating financial crimes, bank fraud, tax evasion, terrorist financing, and money laundering cases. Despite a new Law on Financial Police in May 2007, making the FPU a separate legal entity with its own budget, and more precisely defining and enhancing the FPU's responsibilities, there is still overlap in many areas with the PRO, the Customs Administration, and especially with the regular police. In 2009 there were no convictions for money laundering or terrorist financing.

The FIU, the National Bank, and the Ministry of Finance circulate the lists of terrorist financing entities they receive. The authorities are allowed to identify named accounts, but require court orders before they can freeze and/or seize assets in those accounts.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There is no evidence of currency transactions involving proceeds from narcotics trafficking, including transactions involving U.S. currency or currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United States.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

No information available.

International agreements:

Macedonia has mutual legal assistance agreements with many countries. Macedonia's FIU has signed MOUs for information exchange on money laundering with 31 other FIUs.

Macedonia is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Macedonia is a member of the Council of Europe Select Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures (MONEYVAL), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/Evaluations/ Evaluation_reports_en.asp

Recommendations:

The Government of Macedonia's enactment of new asset forfeiture laws in 2009 was a positive step forward. The GOM now needs to take additional steps to fully implement its legislation. Macedonia should provide the necessary resources and training to both government and private entities with responsibilities under the laws. The GOM should improve supervision of the non-bank financial sector, including bringing those designated non-financial businesses and professions not currently covered under the LPMLTF--high value goods dealers, real estate and travel agencies--into the list of responsible entities. Macedonia also should clarify the roles of the various police entities to enhance cooperation and prevent unnecessary overlap and duplication of efforts.

Madagascar

Madagascar is not an important regional financial center. Due to the political crisis in Madagascar, illicit activities, public corruption, and associated money laundering appear to have increased in 2009. Tax and customs fraud, violation of the foreign exchange code, and illegal rosewood logging are the major sources of proceeds. Smuggling of gemstones, protected flora and fauna, and illegal drugs, to a lesser extent, also contributes to money laundering. Madagascar's inadequately monitored 3,000 mile coastline facilitates smuggling and money laundering. Criminal proceeds laundered in the country derive mostly from domestic criminal activity, but are often linked to international trade. It is suspected that most money laundering occurs through informal channels and is not tracked by the government.

Offshore Center: Yes

Offshore banks and international business companies are permitted in Madagascar. Along with domestic banks and credit institutions, offshore banks are required to request authorization from the Financial and Banking Supervision Committee (CSBF) which is affiliated with the central Bank.

Free Trade Zones:

There is no free trade zone, but producers of export commodities may apply for export processing zone (EPZ) status if they meet certain conditions. EPZ status is not restricted to a geographic area.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

In 1997, Madagascar criminalized money laundering related to narcotics trafficking with Law 97-039, which governs the production, processing and commercialization of narcotics, psychotropic substances, and precursors.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

In 2004, Law 2004-020 governing money laundering and the search, seizure, and confiscation of assets was enacted. Law 2004-020 designates money laundering as deriving from all serious offenses.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: No

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

A bill on terrorism financing has been finalized, but its adoption has been delayed due to the dissolution of the parliament following a coup d'etat in March 2009.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Banks and other financial institutions are required to know, record, and report the identity of customers engaging in transactions above the equivalent of $30,000.

Bank records retention: Yes

Banks and other financial institutions are required to maintain for five years all information regarding significant transactions through financial institutions.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Law 2004-020 stipulates that financial institutions, including banks and moneychangers, are required to report suspicious transactions. The reporting is mandatory, and there is no reporting threshold. In June 2007, the government issued decree 2007-510 to establish SAMIFIN as Madagascar's financial intelligence unit (FIU). In 2009, SAMIFIN received 45 suspicious transaction reports. Ten cases were referred to the public prosecutors.

Large currency transaction reporting: No

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture: Yes

Law 2004-020 covers the seizure, freezing and forfeiture of narcotics-related assets as well as assets derived from, or intended for, terrorist financing and other serious crimes. The judicial authority is responsible for asset seizure and forfeiture. The law permits the freezing and seizure of assets that are the object of investigation. The public prosecutor can confiscate not only the individual's assets and properties, but also those of a spouse or children. The law applies to all types of money laundering. There is no civil forfeiture.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

No information available.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: Yes

Currency flows out of the country over the equivalent of $7,000 must be reported to the Ministry of Finance. The Ministry of Finance monitors currency inflows. The regulations appear to be aimed at enforcing currency exchange requirements.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

Law 2004-020 (Art 44-46) provides for multilateral cooperation with foreign governments regarding investigation of money laundering cases.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

The public prosecutor is not adequately trained to investigate money laundering. This has hindered the effectiveness of the FIU, as cases that are referred to the prosecutor often do not advance. There were no prosecutions for money laundering by the end of 2009, although SAMIFIN referred ten cases to the public prosecutor during the year.

The existence of black market exchanges and hawala systems are widely acknowledged. The law (foreign exchange code) prohibits such practices, but the law is not enforced sufficiently. The GOM has to date focused on the formal system.

The list of individuals and entities included on the UN 1267 sanctions committee's consolidated list has been circulated to the FIU. In 2009, the country didn't identify, freeze or seize related assets.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

Madagascar's financial institutions do not engage in currency transactions involving international narcotics trafficking proceeds that include significant amounts of U.S. currency or currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United States or that otherwise significantly affect the United States.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

There is no written agreement specifically for the sharing of records on money laundering, narcotics, or terrorism cases, but law enforcement authorities have expressed a willingness to cooperate informally if a need arises.

International agreements:

SAMIFIN's Egmont Group membership has been delayed due to the delay in approval of the terrorism finance bill.

Madagascar is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Madagascar is not yet a member of a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Contacts have been established with the East and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAMLAG) secretariat to start the integration process.

Recommendations:

The Government of Madagascar (GOM) should continue to implement the requirements of Law 2004-020 and internationally recognized anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing standards. The GOM should pass the stalled legislation on terrorism financing. Additional effort should be made to combat smuggling. Money laundering related to underground finance and informal value transfer systems should be recognized and enforced. The GOM should train police and customs authorities to proactively recognize money laundering at the street level and at the ports of entry. Additionally, prosecutors should receive training so they are more able to successfully prosecute complex financial crime and money laundering cases.

Malawi

Malawi is not a regional financial center. Some money laundering is tied to smuggling and converting remittance savings systems abroad.

Offshore Center:

No information available.

Free Trade Zones:

No information available.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related:

In August 2006, Malawi passed the Money Laundering, Proceeds of Serious Crime and Terrorist Financing Act (ML/TF Act) which criminalizes money laundering related to all serious crimes.

Criminalizes terrorist financing:

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

No information available.

Know-your-customer rules:

Financial institutions are required to record and report the identity of customers making large transactions. These records must be available to the Reserve Bank of Malawi (RBM) upon request.

Bank records retention:

Banks must maintain the records of identified customers for seven years.

Suspicious transaction reporting:

Banks are allowed, but not required, to submit suspicious transaction reports to the RBM.

Large currency transaction reporting:

No information available.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

The ML/TF Act provides a legal framework for identifying, freezing, and seizing assets related to money laundering. The RBM has the legal authority to identify and freeze assets suspected of involvement in terrorist financing.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

No information available.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

No information available.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals):

No information available.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

The ML/TF Act establishes a financial intelligence unit (FIU) to analyze financial transactions to detect money laundering and other crimes. The government has not yet created the FIU or appointed a director to head the organization.

The RBM has circulated to the financial community the names of suspected terrorists and terrorist organizations listed on the UN 1267 Sanctions Committee's consolidated list and the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists designated by the United States pursuant to Executive Order 13224.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

No information available.

International agreements:

Malawi is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Malawi is a member of the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group, a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.esaamlg.org/reports/view_me.php?id=165

Recommendations:

Now that the Government of Malawi has adopted its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing legislation, it should work toward full implementation of its laws. The GOLM should appoint a technically competent FIU director and develop viable regimes to thwart both money laundering and terrorist financing. The GOM also should make the filing of STRs by financial institutions mandatory.

Malaysia

Malaysia is a growing regional financial center and has a well developed anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework. Malaysia's long porous land and sea borders and its strategic geographic position increase its vulnerability to money laundering and terrorist financing in the region. Drug trafficking is the main source of illegal proceeds in Malaysia. Malaysia is primarily used as a transit country to transfer drugs originating from the Golden Triangle, Pakistan, India, and Europe, which, among others, include heroin, amphetamine type substances, and ketamine. Other sources of illegal proceeds include theft, fraud, corruption, criminal breach of trust, smuggling of high tariff goods, trafficking of people, and illegal deposit taking. Money laundering techniques include the use of remittance services, couriers, front companies, purchasing high value goods and real property, and investment in capital markets. Nigerian criminal groups are involved in a variety of financial crimes in Malaysia, to include counterfeit currency, investment schemes, and using Malay bank accounts to transfer funds in and out of Malaysia.

Offshore Center: Yes

While Malaysia's offshore financial center on the island of Labuan has different regulations for the establishment and operation of offshore businesses, it is subject to the same AML/CFT laws as those governing onshore financial service providers. Malaysia's Labuan Offshore Financial Services Authority (LOFSA) licenses offshore banks, trust companies, and insurance companies, and performs background checks before granting an offshore license. LOFSA is responsible for ensuring AML/CFT compliance on Labuan.

Labuan's 48 offshore banks (including ten investment banks), insurance companies, trust companies, trading agents, and listing sponsors are subject to all AML/CFT requirements, including the filing of suspicious transaction reports (STRs). The financial institutions operating in Labuan are generally among the largest international banks and insurers. Nominee (anonymous) directors are not permitted for offshore banks or for trust or insurance companies. As of October 2009, Labuan had 7,322 registered offshore companies. Bearer instruments are strictly prohibited in Labuan. Offshore companies must be established through a trust company, which is required by law to establish true beneficial owners and submit STRs. There is no requirement to publish the true identity of the beneficial owner of international corporations; however, LOFSA requires every organization operating in Labuan to disclose information on its beneficial owner(s), as part of its offshore company licensing procedures. LOFSA maintains financial information on licensed entities, releasing it either with the consent of those entities or upon investigation.

Free Trade Zones: Yes

The Free Zone Act of 1990 is the enabling legislation for free trade zones in Malaysia. The zones are divided into Free Industrial Zones (FIZ), where manufacturing and assembly takes place, and Free Commercial Zones (FCZ), generally for warehousing commercial stock. The FIZs are designed mainly to promote manufacturing industries producing goods mainly for export and are dominated by large international manufacturers such as Dell and Intel, which are attracted to the zones because they offer preferential tax and tariff treatment. The Minister of Finance may designate any suitable area as an FIZ or FCZ. Currently there are 17 FIZs and 17 FCZs in Malaysia. The Minister of Finance may appoint any federal, state, or local government agency or entity as an authority to administer, maintain, and operate any free trade zone. Companies wishing to operate in an FIZ or FCZ must be licensed. The time needed to obtain a license to operate in a particular free trade zone from the administrative authority depends on the type of activity.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Sections 3 and 4 of the Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988 criminalize any dealings that involve property derived from or is the subject of a narcotics offense.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Malaysia continues to enhance its AML/CFT framework. In 2009, the types of money laundering serious offenses increased from 223 to 245, which are covered by 37 pieces of legislation collectively known as the AMLATFA. New types of money laundering serious offenses in 2009 originated from modifications to the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2007, the Money Changing Act of 1998, the Exchange Control Act 1953, and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act of 2008.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

As part of the measures to strengthen its counter-terrorism legislative framework, between 2003 and 2004, the Government of Malaysia (GOM) enacted amendments to five different pieces of legislation: the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001 or AMLA, the Penal Code, the Subordinate Courts Act, the Courts of Judicature Act, and the Criminal Procedure Code. These amendments which specifically criminalized terrorist acts and terrorism financing were brought into force on March 6, 2007. Moreover, the amendments that impose penalties for terrorist acts allow for the forfeiture of multiple forms of terrorist-related assets and allow for the prosecution of individuals who have provided material support for terrorists.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Reporting institutions are subject to strict customer due diligence (CDD) rules under the AMLATFA. The GOM has adopted banker negligence laws that make individual bankers responsible if their institutions launder money or finance terrorists.

Bank records retention: Yes

Every transaction, regardless of its size, is recorded. Reporting institutions must maintain records for at least six years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Reporting institutions must promptly report any suspicious transactions to the financial intelligence unit (FIU), regardless of the amount of the transaction. Reporting institutions covered under the AMLATFA include financial institutions from the conventional, Islamic, and offshore sectors, offshore listing sponsors and trading agents, stock brokers, futures brokers, unit trust management companies, fund managers, futures fund managers, money lenders and pawnbrokers, non-bank remittance service providers, non-bank affiliated charge and credit card issuers, insurance financial advisers, e-money issuers and leasing and factoring businesses. Malaysia's growing Islamic finance sector is subject to the same regulatory requirements and supervision as the conventional banks. Non-financial businesses and professions are also covered, including lawyers, public notaries, accountants, company secretaries, licensed casinos and gaming outlets, registered estate agents, trust companies, and dealers in precious metals and stones.

Large currency transaction reporting: Yes

A cash reporting requirement for all transactions above RM 50,000 (approximately $14,600) is imposed upon banking institutions.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Comprehensive laws exist for the seizing and confiscation of property in relation to the offenses of money laundering and narcotics trafficking. The Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988 contains specific provisions for the forfeiture of drug-related property. 'Property', as defined in section 2 of the Act, may be forfeited with or without a conviction for a predicate offense and where there is no prosecution.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

Malaysia has no formal mechanism for the sharing of confiscated assets with other countries.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: Yes

Effective January 2010, under section 23 of AMLATFA, travelers entering or leaving Malaysia must declare cash and/or negotiable bearer instruments exceeding an amount equivalent to $10,000. Travelers could be fined and/or face imprisonment if they fail to declare or make a false declaration.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

The GOM continues to enhance its cooperation on a regional, multilateral, and international basis. The Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act of 2002 enables Malaysia to request and render mutual assistance in criminal matters and thereby assist states in criminal investigations and proceedings on criminal matters related to serious offenses (such as terrorism, drug trafficking, fraud, money laundering and human trafficking).

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties:

In February 2009, LOFSA issued an operating license to Far East Export Bank (FEEB), a wholly owned subsidiary of Iran-based Bank Mellat. Bank Mellat was designated by the United States under E.O. 13382 on October 25, 2007 for engaging in proliferation finance activities in Iran. The U.S. engaged with LOFSA, the central bank and other GOM ministries, identifying Bank Mellat as a known financier of proliferation items for Iran's nuclear program in contravention of UN Security Council Resolutions. The U.S. recommended that LOFSA not issue the FEEB operating license. Following LOFSA's decision to issue FEEB a license, the United States has consistently advocated for revocation. FEEB opened its Labuan operation in August 2009. The United States designated FEEB under E.O. 13382 on November 5, 2009, based on its relationship to Bank Mellat. The United States believes that FEEB represents a significant risk to the integrity of Malaysia's financial system.

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

A number of terrorist organizations have been active on Malaysian territory, and authorities have taken action against Jemaah Islamiah and other terrorist networks. Terrorist financing in Malaysia is predominantly carried out using cash and relies on trusted networks. While Malaysia has recently improved the legislative framework to criminalize terrorist financing, there have been no investigations, prosecutions or convictions relating to terrorist financing under this new scheme as the GOM continued to use the Internal Security Act as a preventive measure instead of thorough investigations.

As of December 2009, the Attorney General's Chambers is prosecuting 84 money laundering cases, involving a total of 2,682 charges with a cumulative total value of RM 941.1 million (approximately $276.8 million). These money laundering cases include self-laundering cases. Out of the 84 cases, there have been eight convictions and three acquittals. The other cases are ongoing.

In 2007, the GOM improved relevant legislation, enabling it to comprehensively freeze assets under the UNSCRs 1267 and 1373. The Home Affairs Ministry has the authority under the AMLATFA to declare terrorists and terrorist organizations listed on the UN 1267 Sanctions Committee's consolidated list as designated entities whose properties are to be frozen. To ensure immediate freezing action, the FIU disseminates electronically an updated UN consolidated list as well as orders or circulars to financial institutions. At the same time, the FIU also disseminates information on persons and entities designated unilaterally by other countries, including the United States, to these institutions.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) with the United States entered into force in January 2009. The GOM has cooperated closely with U.S. law enforcement in investigating terrorist-related cases since the signing of a joint declaration to combat international terrorism in May 2002.

International agreements:

Since 2003, Malaysia has concluded MLATs with several countries.

Malaysia is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Malaysia is an active member of the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation report can be found here: http://www.apgml.org/documents/docs/17/Malaysian%20MER%20-%20 FINAL%20August%202007.pdf

Recommendations:

Malaysia is not a major money laundering country and has a strong commitment to preventing money laundering and terrorist financing. The Government of Malaysia (GOM) intends to continue its involvement in AML/CFT matters on a regional, multilateral, and international basis and its leadership in global AML/CFT efforts. However, Malaysia should enact legislation to improve AML/CFT oversight in Labuan and endow LOFSA with sufficient resources to carry out adequate supervision, particularly over its banks, IBCs, and trust companies. In addition, LOFSA should revoke the operating license of Far East Export Bank to protect Malaysia from the risk of proliferation finance occurring in its jurisdiction. Bank Negara Malaysia also should continue its efforts to encourage the use of formal rather than informal remittances which are not subject to AML/CFT controls and may pose vulnerabilities for abuse by money launderers and terrorist financiers. Law enforcement and customs authorities should examine trade based money laundering and invoice manipulation and their relationship to underground finance and informal remittance systems. More effort should be made to improve Malaysia's capacity to identify, investigate, and prosecute terrorist financing.

Maldives

Maldives is not an important regional financial center. The financial sector of the Maldives is very small, with five commercial banks, two insurance companies, and a government provident fund. Although the crime rate in the Maldives is considered low, there is an increasing use of narcotics. The Maldives is located in an area prone to narcotics smuggling making the Maldives vulnerable as a transit point for shipments of illicit drugs meant for other nations and the laundering of narcotics proceeds.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones:

No information available.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Law No. 17/77 on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances prohibits trafficking of illegal narcotics and the laundering of proceeds from the illicit narcotics trade.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: No

The Government of Maldives (GOM) has drafted broader anti-money laundering legislation.

Criminalizes terrorist financing:

Law No. 10/90 on Prevention of Terrorism in the Maldives deals with some aspects of money laundering and terrorist financing. Provision of funds or any form of assistance towards the commissioning or planning of any terrorist activity is unlawful.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

The Maldives Monetary Authority has issued know-your-customer directives.

Bank records retention:

No information available.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

The GOM has created a financial intelligence unit (FIU) within the Maldives Monetary Authority (MMA). The main functions of the FIU are to receive and analyze information on suspicious transactions, and, as appropriate, refer it for investigation to law enforcement agencies. The FIU is at an early stage of development. In the short term, the FIU operates under regulations and circulars issued under the MMA act of 1981. Regulations to cover the FIU are expected to be included in the new money laundering legislation. Through October 2009, the FIU only processed four suspicious transaction reports.

Large currency transaction reporting:

No information available.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

No information available.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

No information available.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

No information available.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

No information available.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

The FIU distributes the United Nations' lists of the proscribed people and organizations. The Maldives does not have a national sanctions list.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

No information available.

International agreements:

The GOM is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--No

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--No

In 2008, the Maldives became a member of the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Maldives has not yet had a mutual evaluation.

Recommendations:

The Government of the Maldives (GOM) is developing its anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) system. The Maldives is in the process of drafting AML/CFT laws and should work closely with the APG to ensure that countermeasures adhere to international standards. The GOM should pass its draft anti-money laundering law and provide adequate resources and training to its new FIU to enable it to fulfill its responsibilities.

Mali

The formal financial sector is underdeveloped in Mali. The informal sector accounts for a substantial proportion of economic activity in the country, a characteristic shared by the other West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) member states. The Malian economy functions to a large extent on cash. Transfers of funds from the diaspora are substantial. A major share of transfers of funds is carried out through the physical transportation of currency, either by professional cash couriers or by individuals themselves, mainly through inter-African exchanges. In general, the criminal environment is characterized by sizable amounts of illegal trafficking and by a level of corruption that is perceived to be high by global standards but in the median range by West African standards. The territory of Mali, in particular the desert north, is used for various kinds of trafficking, including narcotics, humans, arms, and cigarettes. In this regard, Mali is directly affected by the increasing role West Africa plays in the international drug trade and, more generally, by the growth of illegal trafficking in the region. Mali has an internal market for smuggled cigarettes, pharmaceuticals, and other products, but these activities are primarily a way to avoid Malian customs duties. Also, since Algeria subsidizes many consumables items, including fuel and many foodstuffs, much of what is traded in northern Mali has been smuggled from southern Algeria.

Terrorism and terrorist financing are also of increasing concern. The Algerian-based terrorist group al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) is active in northern Mali. AQIM appears to be financed by the maintenance of lucrative trafficking routes as well as the collection of ransoms following the kidnapping of Westerners in the Sahelian zone, to include Algeria, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger. This situation is aggravated by the vastness of the under-populated north and the long, virtually unmonitored border. The human and material resources available to the authorities for controlling this territory are extremely limited.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Partially

The Malian anti-money laundering system is determined by Law No. 06-066 of December 2006, which transposes into national law Community Directive 07/2002, adopted by the WAEMU Council of Ministers in 2002. Law No. 06-066 defines money laundering and specifies the penalties for those guilty of the offense of money laundering. There are serious limitations and deficiencies in the law. Other professions are covered by the law, but their inclusion under the anti-money laundering (AML) system has not been implemented.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

In 2008, Mali passed law No. 08-025, which criminalizes terrorism and terrorist financing.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Law No. 06-066 establishes customer due diligence (CDD) obligations, which must be performed by all financial entities before they open an account or enter into any other business relationship with a customer (Article 7); or when they carry out occasional cash transactions exceeding CFAF 5 million (approximately $10,000) or in the case of repeated occasional transactions (Art. 8); and, if the source of funds is questionable in an occasional transaction (Article 8). The CDD obligations apply whenever there are repeated occasional transactions, regardless of the amount threshold. The West African Central Bank (BCEAO) enacted a circular (2007/RB) in 2007 that obliges financial institutions to exercise vigilance with respect to customer identification, record keeping, and detection of suspicious transactions, but it does not establish sufficient guidelines to help financial institutions comply with their AML obligations.

Bank records retention:

No information available.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Law 06-066 contains provisions for the creation of the National Financial Information Processing Unit (CENTIF), the Malian financial intelligence unit (FIU). Since the creation of CENTIF in May 2008, banks and nonprofit organizations have been obligated to file suspicious transaction reports (STRs). In 2009, Malian banks filed eight STRs with CENTIF. One of these was referred to the Ministry of Justice for further investigation.

Large currency transaction reporting:

No information available.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture: Yes

The mandatory confiscation of goods constituting the proceeds of money laundering is stipulated in Article 45 of Law 06-066. However, the proceeds generated by the commission of a predicate offense to money laundering are not included among the property subject to confiscation. Rather, the confiscation of proceeds generated by the commission of another crime or offense is covered by the Malian penal code, Title III, Article 9.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

No information available.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: No

Detection of the physical cross-border transportation of currency falls to the customs service. Community regulations in this area form an annex to the customs code and provide customs agents with code-derived powers to detect and sanction exchange control violations, according to the authorities. The system of controls currently in place is mixed and depends on the status of the person transporting the funds (resident versus nonresident), as well as his/her destination (inside versus outside the WAEMU zone). These different thresholds make it difficult to enforce the regulations.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

An agreement for cooperation in criminal police matters between member countries of ECOWAS was signed by the heads of state in Accra on December 19, 2003. The national Interpol office (BCN-Interpol) in Bamako works in close collaboration with the secretariat of the International Criminal Police Organization (ICPO) and other national offices. Cooperation between WAEMU countries through BCN-Interpol involves both the sharing of information and assistance in conducting investigations. Customs departments collaborate with their counterparts in WAEMU countries through the Customs Enforcement Network (CEN).

AML Law 06-066 allows Mali's CENTIF to share information with foreign FIUs on the condition of reciprocity and analogous requirements in regard to professional secrecy.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

Mali has a system of informal cooperatives that raise capital called tontines. This informal system poses a dual risk from the money laundering standpoint: they parallel the formal financial system--sometimes to the detriment of the latter's development--and thus have the potential of recycling some criminal proceeds; they might also serve as a screen to prevent the identification of the origin of funds, imparting an appearance of legality to sometimes very substantial amounts of illicit funds.

In 2009, there were no arrests or prosecutions for money laundering or terrorist financing.

Mali has circulated to its financial institutions the list of individuals and entities included on the UN 1267 sanctions committee's consolidated list as well as the list of terrorist organizations/financiers that the USG or the European Union have designated under relevant authorities.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There is no evidence that Mali's financial institutions engage in currency transactions involving international narcotics trafficking proceeds.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

There have not been any exchanges of information.

International agreements:

Mali participates, under the aegis of the United States, in the Trans-Saharan Counter-Terrorism Initiative, a 12-country mechanism designed to facilitate information sharing and cooperation among these countries in regard to terrorist financing.

Mali is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Mali is a member of the Intergovernmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation report can be found here: http://www.giaba.org/index.php?type=c&id=24&mod=2&men=2

Recommendations:

The Government of Mali should continue to make efforts to implement anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing countermeasures that adhere to international standards. The GOM should fully implement Law 06-066, particularly implementing reporting and CDD standards for all covered entities.

Malta

Malta is not a regional financial center. Malta's location between the African and European continents facilitates narcotics smuggling and possibly the smuggling of persons into other countries--particularly Italy.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: Yes

There is one free trade zone in Malta, the Malta Freeport Terminals Ltd., which serves as a transshipment logistical center in the central Mediterranean and provides container handling and industrial storage services.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

On July 31, 2008, the Prevention of Money Laundering and Funding of Terrorism Regulations 2008 (PMLFTR) were implemented, transposing provisions of the European Union's Third Money Laundering Directive into Maltese law.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

In 2002, the criminal code was amended so that terrorist financing would meet the standard for categorization as a serious crime under Malta's Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). On June 6, 2005, the Act was extensively amended and expanded to include provisions for offenses of terrorism and the funding of terrorism.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Bank records retention: Yes

Financial institutions are required by law to maintain all necessary records on transactions for at least five years following the completion of the transaction (or longer if required to do so) regardless of whether the business relationship is ongoing or has been terminated.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

In 2001, the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) was established to serve as Malta's financial intelligence unit (FIU). The GOM requires banks, currency exchange offices, stockbrokers, insurance companies, money remittance/transfer services, and other designated non-bank financial businesses and professions to file suspicious transaction reports (STRs) with the FIAU, which investigates them. There is no monetary threshold and filing of a STR is required regardless of whether the transaction is completed. In 2008, the FIAU received 69 STRs.

Large currency transaction reporting: No

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture: Yes

The PMLA deals with proceeds from any criminal offense. The Criminal Code deals with proceeds and instrumentalities from all crimes and in particular terrorism-related offenses. Confiscation/forfeiture provisions under the PMLA and Criminal Code are mandatory. The forfeiture provisions in the Criminal Code refer to all crimes liable to a punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year or more. Civil forfeiture separate from a conviction is not provided for by law.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

There is no specific authorization or authority for asset sharing, but no restriction on sharing assets is imposed by statute. There is no record of any prior request for asset sharing.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: Yes

Legal Notice 149 of 2007 (Cash Control Regulations) requires that any person entering or leaving Malta and carrying a sum equivalent to euro 10,000 (approximately $13,500) or more in cash is obligated to declare that sum to the authorities.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

Malta is party to the 1990 Strasbourg Convention and to several bilateral mutual legal assistance agreements.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

The GOM has designated one of the country's five prosecutors to deal solely with money laundering cases. Bank secrecy laws are completely lifted by law in cases of money laundering (or other criminal) investigations. There were two convictions for money laundering in 2009.

The names of individuals and entities included on the UNSCR 1267 Sanctions Committee's consolidated list are circulated to financial institutions. To date, no assets have been identified, frozen and/or seized as a result of this process.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There are no indications that currency transactions in Malta involve international narcotics trafficking proceeds or include significant amounts of U.S. currency or currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United States or that otherwise significantly affect the United States.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The FIAU is able to exchange information with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.

International agreements:

Malta is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Malta is a member of the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation report can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/Evaluations/ round3/MONEYVAL%282007%2905Rep-MLT3_en.pdf

Recommendations:

The Government of Malta should continue to enhance its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing legislation and procedures, as appropriate.

Mauritania

Mauritania is not a regional financial center. Its economic system suffers from a combination of weak Central Bank oversight, lax financial auditing standards, porous borders, and corruption in government and the private sector. The Government of Mauritania (GOM) did make some improvements in 2007 and 2008 by strengthening the Central Bank's financial management system and making it more transparent, restructuring the foreign exchange system, and improving oversight of commercial banks. However, the August 2008 coup d'etat and resulting changes to the political and economic systems could make the country more vulnerable to money laundering.

Most money laundering in Mauritania involves profits from graft and small-scale illicit activity. Terrorism financing and narcotics proceeds are believed to constitute a small but growing portion of the sums laundered in Mauritania. Mauritania is a transit country for a variety of smuggled goods, including cigarettes, diverted food aid, small arms, clandestine immigrants, vehicles, and narcotics. Cocaine is the most commonly smuggled drug. Contraband smuggling generates modest funds that are laundered through the banking system. While money laundering and terrorist financing are limited in Mauritania, weak oversight and public corruption allows them to continue.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

The 1992 law governing money laundering focuses specifically on laundering from narcotics trafficking.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Money laundering is a criminal offense in Mauritania. The GOM drafted a new body of laws in 2005 that strengthen government control over money laundering related to terrorist groups and activities although they do not take an "all serious crimes" approach.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

On July 27, 2005, the GOM adopted law 2005-47 criminalizing terrorism and law 2005-48 criminalizing money laundering and terrorist financing.

Know-your-customer rules:

Banks are required to record and report to the Central Bank the identity of customers engaging in large-scale financial transactions.

Bank records retention: Yes

Banks and other financial institutions are required to maintain records necessary to reconstruct significant transactions for ten years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Anti-money laundering controls are applied to banks and non-bank financial institutions such as exchange houses, and to intermediaries including lawyers, accountants, and broker/dealers. Financial institutions may report transactions they consider suspicious to the Central Bank; however, such reporting is done on a voluntary basis. The 2005 anti-money laundering law provides for the establishment and funding of the Financial Information and Analysis Commission (FIAC), equivalent to a financial intelligence unit (FIU). The FIAC became operational in 2008, but its capacity to conduct analysis has not yet been proven.

Large currency transaction reporting:

No information available.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Mauritania has enacted laws for identifying, tracing, freezing, seizing, and forfeiting narcotics-related assets as well as assets derived from or intended for terrorist financing and other serious crime. The authority comes from the 1992 law governing money laundering from drug trafficking and the 2005 laws governing terrorism, money laundering, and terrorist financing. However, these laws have not been fully implemented. The Ministry of Interior is responsible for tracing, seizing, and freezing assets. The GOM does not have an independent national system and mechanism for freezing terrorist assets.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

No information available.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: No

Cross-border transportation of currency and monetary instruments is limited to the equivalent of $3000. The Central Bank can grant exceptions to allow transport of larger amounts of currency across the border. Declaration forms are not used at border crossings. Cash smuggling reports are not entered into a data base.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

There are no known impediments to international cooperation.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

There are four government bodies responsible for investigating financial crimes: the FIAC, the Central Bank, the Ministry of the Interior, and the state Inspector General. These bodies lack adequate staff and training. There have been two arrests and one indictment for money laundering since January 1, 2007. In June 2009, a Mauritanian court indicted an individual for drug trafficking and money laundering.

The GOM acknowledges the existence and use of indigenous alternative remittance systems that bypass financial institutions. The GOM has taken steps to reduce the disparity between the official exchange rate and the parallel exchange rate to make black market exchanges less attractive. It has also increased patrols along its borders and in remote areas of the country to counter cross border cash smuggling.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There are no indications that currency transactions in Mauritania involve international narcotics trafficking proceeds that include significant amounts of U.S. currency or currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United States or that otherwise significantly affect the United States.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The GOM has not adopted laws or regulations that allow for the exchange of records with the United States. The GOM has demonstrated a willingness to cooperate with the United States on combating financial crimes, terrorist financing and related issues, but local efforts are hampered by a serious lack of resources, knowledge, and expertise in this area.

International agreements:

Mauritania is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

The GOM is not a member of any Financial Action Task Force-style regional body.

Recommendations:

The Government of Mauritania should continue to make efforts to adhere to relevant international money laundering and counter-terrorist financing standards. The GOM should fully implement the laws and standards it has established. Mauritania should circulate to its financial institutions the list of individuals and entities included on the UN 1267 sanctions committee's consolidated list as being linked to Usama Bin Ladin, members of the al-Qaida organization, or the Taliban.

Mauritius

Mauritius has developed a reputation as a well-regulated and credible international financial center. According to the local Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), laundered funds are primarily the proceeds from drug trafficking--mainly heroin, and increasingly, Subutex. Other important predicate crimes for money laundering offenses include aggravated larceny, conspiracy, forgery, swindling, and corruption. Criminal proceeds laundered in Mauritius are not controlled by drug trafficking organizations or organized criminal groups. There is no significant black market for smuggled goods in Mauritius, although there is occasional smuggling of stolen automobiles and cigarettes. According to ICAC, money laundering occurs in the banking system, the offshore financial center, as well as the non-bank financial system. Criminal proceeds are derived from both domestic and foreign criminal activities. The continuous development of the financial sector in Mauritius has resulted in an increase in financial crimes.

Offshore Center: Yes

The Mauritius Global Business Sector was established in 1992 to attract foreign investment to a wide range of banking and non-banking activities. The Sector is a major route for foreign investments into the Asian sub-continent and is by far the largest source of foreign direct investment and portfolio investment in India. In June 2009, there were 32,895 Global Business Companies (GBCs) in Mauritius, including 619 licensed global funds. There are two types of GBCs based on the category of license. A GBC1 can be structured as a collective investment scheme, global fund or protected cell company. A trust can also qualify for a GBC1 license. GBC2s are engaged in invoicing, marketing and international trading activities. Shell companies and bearer shares are not allowed in Mauritius. As of the end of June 2009, there were 9,883 GBC1s and 23,012 GBC2s. A GBC1 company is required by law to have two resident directors, to hold board meetings in Mauritius, and to be administered by a management company. A GBC2 company must have a management company as a registered agent in Mauritius. Nominee or anonymous directors and/or trustees are not allowed in Mauritius. The offshore sector also includes management companies licensed by the Financial Service Commission (FSC) to provide professional services to GBCs. These services include company incorporation, corporate and fund administration, tax planning and structuring, trusteeship, and accounting services. The management company is required to carry out proper customer due diligence before accepting new business. The FSC licenses and supervises all non-banking financial services and GBCs.

Free Trade Zones:

No information available.

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Money laundering is a criminal offense in Mauritius.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related:

The Finance Act 2009, enacted on July 30, 2009, principally enlarges the definition of crime, applying the crime of money laundering to a wider range of predicate offenses.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

The Prevention of Terrorism Act of 2002 criminalizes terrorist financing. The legislation gives Mauritius powers to track and investigate terrorist-related funds, property, and assets and to cooperate with international bodies. Under the 2003 Mutual Assistance in Criminal and Related Matters Act, terrorism and terrorist financing are considered "serious crimes."

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

It is mandatory for financial institutions to verify the true identity of their customers before opening any account, accepting any deposit of money and securities, or renting a safe deposit box. The Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Regulations of 2003 expressly prohibit financial institutions from opening anonymous or fictitious accounts. They also require financial institutions to establish and verify the identity and current permanent address of an applicant for a business license, the nature of the business, financial status of the business owner and the capacity in which s/he is entering into a business relationship with the financial institution.

Bank records retention: Yes

All documentation required to verify the identity of customers and of beneficial owners must be retained for a period of not less than seven years after the completion of the relevant transaction, closure of the account, or cessation of the business relationship.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Financial institutions, including non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs), are required by the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2002 (FIAMLA) to report all suspicious transactions to the financial intelligence unit (FIU). There is no specific threshold amount for suspicious transactions. Through December 4, 2009, the FIU received 172 STRs and referred 28 Dissemination and Intelligence Reports to investigatory authorities during the same period.

Large currency transaction reporting:

Cash transactions in excess of Rs 500,000 (approximately $16,600) are prohibited in Mauritius, subject to certain exceptions.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Section 45 of the Dangerous Drug Act 2000, as amended by the Finance Act of 2009, includes provisions for the forfeiture of the possessions of convicted persons or any member of his/her family. According to this Act, a suspect would have his assets frozen by the court upon any provisional drug trafficking charge. Forfeiture of assets may take place upon conviction. Although a conveyance used to transport drugs is confiscated, property on which illicit crops are grown is not subject to seizure. Regarding substitute assets, the relationship to the crime must be proven for the assets to be seized. There is no provision to seize legitimate businesses if used to launder drug money or support terrorist activity. In addition to drug-related proceeds, proceeds from corruption offenses also are subject to seizure. Civil forfeiture is not allowed.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

Mauritius passed the Mutual Assistance and Criminal Related Matters Act which allows for the sharing of seized assets with other governments. Thus far there has been no negotiation with other governments to enhance asset tracing, freezing, and seizure.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

Section 131A of the Customs Act of 1988 has been amended to provide that, beginning on October 1, 2009, any person making a physical cross-border transportation of currency or bearer negotiable instrument of an amount of more than Rs 500,000 rupees (approximately $16,600) or its equivalent in any foreign currency shall make a declaration to Customs. Customs Regulations are currently being amended to provide for the use of a currency Declaration Form. The cash declaration system will be implemented as from the date the principal regulations come into force.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

There are no known impediments to cooperation.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

According to ICAC, 39 suspects have been scrutinized since January 2009 in connection with money laundering offenses and prosecution is being contemplated against some of them. In addition, four persons have been convicted in relation to money laundering cases.

In one case, Marie Ange Seblin was convicted for having been in possession of property that, in part, directly represented the proceeds of a crime. The court determined from the circumstantial evidence available that Seblin had reasonable grounds to suspect or was fully aware of the illicit drug activities of her husband, and the inference was drawn that her accounts were being used to accommodate the proceeds of drug trafficking activities.

The Bank of Mauritius in turn circulates the UNSCR 1267 Sanctions Committee list to all Mauritius banks. No terrorist related assets have thus far been identified by banks.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

No information available.

International agreements:

The Mauritius FIU exchanges information with other FIUs which are not members of the Egmont Group on the basis of reciprocity or on the basis of memoranda of understanding.

Mauritius is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Mauritius is a member of the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG), a Financial Action Task Force-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.esaamlg.org/reports/view_me.php?id=173

Recommendations:

Mauritius has adopted a comprehensive anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing regime. The Government of Mauritius should continue its efforts to enhance its system, including the timely implementation of its new cross-border currency declaration system. Mauritius also should enact its pending civil asset forfeiture legislation and consider expanding its forfeiture regime beyond just drug or corruption-related offenses.

Mexico

Mexico is a major drug-producing and drug-transit country and is also one of the major conduits for proceeds from illegal drug sales leaving the United States. Proceeds from the illicit drug trade are the principal source of funds laundered through the Mexican financial and commercial systems. Other major sources of illegal proceeds being laundered include corruption, kidnapping, trafficking in firearms and persons, and other crimes. The smuggling of bulk shipments of U.S. currency into Mexico and the repatriation of the cash into the United States via couriers, armored vehicles, and wire transfers remain favored methods for laundering drug proceeds. In addition, criminal organizations have established networks with criminal groups based in other countries to facilitate and develop new methods to transport, transfer, and launder illicit funds. Estimates range from $8 billion to $25 billion being repatriated to Mexico from the U.S. annually by drug trafficking organizations.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zone: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Article 400 bis of the Federal Penal Code criminalizes money laundering related to any serious crime.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Mexico's all-crimes approach to money laundering criminalizes the laundering of the proceeds of any intentional criminal act or omission, regardless of whether or not that act or omission carries a prison term.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

On June 29, 2007, Mexico criminalized terrorist financing under the Federal Penal Procedures Code. Article 139 criminalizes domestic terrorist financing and Article 148 bis criminalizes international terrorist financing.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Under the Law of Credit Institutions, Mexican financial institutions, including banks and other financial institutions (including mutual savings companies, insurance companies, securities brokers, retirement and investment funds, financial leasing and factoring funds, casas de cambio, and centros cambiarios) must follow know-your-customer rules. Regulations require enhanced due diligence for higher-risk customers including politically exposed persons.

Changes to the General Law of Credit Auxiliary Organizations and Activities to harmonize requirements, rules and standards to detect money laundering operations between larger banks and other smaller financial institutions were issued in the Official Gazette on September 25, 2009. The reform also reduces the threshold to identify a user of cash operations, travelers' checks or prepaid cards from $3,000 to $500. For operations larger than $3,000, the reform will require foreign exchange houses, centros cambiarios, and money transmitters to create a complete file of the user.

Bank records retention: Yes

Mexican law obligates banks to maintain business transaction records for at least ten years. Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

All Mexican Financial Institutions are required to report actual and attempted suspicious transactions to the Mexican FIU. In 2009, the FIU received 49,908 STRs.

Large currency transaction reporting:

In addition to banks, a 2005 provision of the tax law requires real estate brokerages, attorney, notaries, accountants, and dealers in precious metals and stones to report all transactions exceeding $10,000 (except for centros cambiarios, which are subject to a $3,000 threshold). In 2006, nonprofit organizations were made subject to reporting requirements for donations greater than $10,000.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture: Yes

The forfeiture legislation approved by the Mexican Congress in 2009 allows seizing and forfeiting of assets used by organized criminals in executing drug-trafficking, money laundering, kidnapping, car robbery, embezzlement, and trafficking of persons. The legislation now permits specialized judges to authorize an asset forfeiture procedure independently of the criminal process being followed against an alleged criminal, and before a final ruling or conviction.

The list of individuals and entities included in the UN 1267 Sanction Committee's consolidated list is distributed to government agencies and to financial institutions.

Narcotics asset sharing authority: No

Cross-border currency transportation requirements: Yes

All individuals entering or departing Mexico with more than $10,000 in currency or monetary instruments must file a report with Customs. Customs authorities send these reports to the financial intelligence unit (FIU). As of November 2009, bulk cash seizures for the year amount to $70 million nationwide.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals): Yes

There are no known impediments to international cooperation.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

Money remitters are not subject to Mexico's wire transfer regulations.

From 2006 through 2009, authorities have obtained 90 convictions for the offense. In December 2009, Mexican authorities arrested 11 suspected money launderers during raids on 17 finance companies in the northern cities of Culiacan and Tijuana. According to authorities, the money laundering ring operated through a series of companies, some of which posed as authorized financial institutions while others were simply shell companies.

The lack of personnel--including more field investigators, prosecutors, and auditors--monetary resources, a comprehensive and modern database, technological equipment, as well as the vulnerability of its facilities undermine prosecution efforts.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

The United States and Mexico are neighbors and major trading partners. Proceeds from the illicit drug trade are the principal source of funds laundered through the Mexican financial and commercial system. Large amounts of U.S. currency derived through the drug trade is transported, transferred, and laundered into the Mexican financial system.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

In 1991 Mexico signed and ratified a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the United States. The U.S. and Mexican FIU routinely share information through the Egmont system. Other bilateral treaties include: Financial Information Exchange Agreement and the memorandum of understanding (MOU) for the exchange of information on the cross-border movement of currency and monetary instruments. The GOM has responded positively to USG efforts to identify and block terrorist-related funds.

International agreements:

The Mexican government has great working relations with many governments including the United States. Mexico is active in many international groups including the G20 and the Egmont Group.

Mexico is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--Yes

Mexico is a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the FATF-style regional body GAFISUD. Mexico also participates in another FATF-style regional body, the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF), as a cooperating and supporting nation. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.fatf-gafi.org/dataoecd/31/45/41970081.pdf

Recommendations:

Mexico should amend its terrorist financing legislation to fully comport with the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism; and enact legislation and procedures to freeze terrorist assets of those designated by the UN al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee. If it has not already done so, the GOM should amend its legislation to ensure that legal persons can be held criminally liable for money laundering and terrorist financing. To create a more effective regime, Mexico should fully implement and improve its mechanisms for asset forfeiture, control the bulk smuggling of currency across its borders, monitor remittance systems for possible exploitation, improve the regulation and supervision of money transmitters, unlicensed currency exchange centers, centros de cambiarios and gambling centers, and extend AML/CFT requirements to designated nonfinancial businesses and professions. Additionally, the capacity of judges and prosecutors should be improved so they are able to successfully prosecute and convict money launderers and terrorist financiers.

Micronesia, Federated States of

The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) is not an important regional financial center. It is not known to be a significant money laundering location. There are no known instances of money laundering related to illegal narcotics, psychotropic substances and/or chemical precursors. The amount of money believed to be laundered through the country is small, and misuse of public funds is the main source of laundered funds. Local law enforcement suspect some smuggled goods are making their way onshore, mostly cigarettes. The FSM's isolation, small and relatively poor population, and limited transportation links make it an unlikely destination for large amounts of smuggled goods.

Offshore Center: No

Free Trade Zones: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

Enacted in 2001, Chapter 9, Title 11 of the FSM Criminal Code, also known as the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime provision, made money laundering a criminal offense. The law does not apply solely to drug-related money laundering and takes an "all serious crimes" approach, i.e., any offense punishable by imprisonment of more than one year.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: No

(Please refer to the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism, which can be found here: http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/)

The FSM ratified the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism in 2001. However, the country has yet to make terrorist financing, or even the commission of terrorist acts, a specific crime.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Bank records retention: Yes

Banks and other financial institutions must maintain their records for five years.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

The money laundering law requires all banks and financial institutions to report suspicious transactions to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ passes the reports to its internal financial intelligence unit (FIU) for investigation. The FIU consists of a single police officer. It has no operational or budgetary independence; it is wholly dependent on the DOJ for funding and the National Police for staff. The officer has both criminal investigative and regulatory responsibilities. There is no threshold amount for a transaction to qualify as an STR. The FIU received 50 STRs in 2009, a substantial increase over 2008.

Large currency transaction reporting: Yes

A transaction of $10,000 or more requires a cash transaction report.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Sections 929-941 of the money laundering law provide for the seizure of "tainted" property, as well as any benefits derived by the defendant from the commission of a money laundering offense. Moreover, the law defines property very broadly as currency and all other real or personal property, wherever it is situated. There is no civil forfeiture. No property has ever been seized or confiscated under the money laundering statute.

Narcotics asset sharing authority: No

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

The FSM does not currently monitor cross-border currency transactions. FSM Customs requires mandatory declaration forms at all ports of entry. Arriving passengers carrying $10,000 or more in currency must declare the amount.

Cooperation with foreign governments:

The Transnational Crime Unit (TCU), reliant on American funding and Australian supervision since its opening in April, 2009, brought officers from other Pacific island nations to Palikir, the Micronesian capital, to share information on such issues as narcotics, human trafficking, and terrorism.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

Local barbershops transmit money to other countries, mostly to the Philippines. Someone deposits money with the barber who then notifies a counterpart overseas to pay a designated recipient. Although this system is mostly used for remittances to families, it could be used to transfer small amounts of laundered proceeds.

The National Police are responsible for investigating financial crimes. There is not enough staff or resources to adequately monitor the sector. There have been no arrests, prosecutions or convictions for money laundering since the FSM criminalized the offense in 2001.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

There are no indications that currency transactions in Micronesia involving international narcotics trafficking proceeds include significant amounts of U.S. currency or currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United States or that otherwise significantly affect the United States.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The TCU cooperates with a wide range of U.S. law enforcement agencies.

International agreements:

Micronesia is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--No

Recommendations:

The Government of Micronesia (GOM) should continue to make efforts to adhere to international anti-money laundering/counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) standards. The GOM should adopt and monitor cross-border currency reporting requirements for travelers both entering and leaving the jurisdiction. Additionally, the GOM should extend coverage of its AML/CFT laws to informal remittance systems. The GOM should become a party to the UN Convention against Corruption.

Monaco

The Principality of Monaco is the second-smallest country in Europe. It is linked closely to France, and is closely tied to the economic apparatus of the European Union (EU) through its customs union with France and its use of the euro as its official currency. Monaco is known for its security and political stability. Historically, Monaco's casinos, run by a majority state-owned company, were major sources of income. Now, however, the casino revenues constitute less than 3% of the state budget. Monaco's state budget is now based primarily on taxes, duties, and excises which account for 75% of the total income. Monaco's approximately 40 banks and financial institutions hold more than 300,000 accounts and manage total assets of about 750 billion Euros (approximately $102,800,000,000). Non-residents total 46 percent of the financial institutions' total number of clients, representing 60% of the total assets and deposits, respectively almost 84,000 clients and 45 billion Euros. Money laundering offenses relate mainly to offenses committed abroad. Reportedly, the Principality does not face ordinary forms of organized crime. There is no significant market for smuggled goods.

In March 2009, The Principality of Monaco announced it would follow the international norms in matters of tax transparency. In September 2009, Monaco was removed from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) list of "non-cooperative" countries in terms of provision of tax information.

Offshore Center: Yes

Offshore companies are subject to the same due diligence and suspicious transaction reporting obligations as banking institutions, and Monegasque authorities conduct on-site audits.

Free Trade Zones: No

Criminalizes narcotics money laundering: Yes

Money laundering is a crime under Act 1.161 of July 7, 1993, which creates an offense of money laundering in the Criminal Code and amends the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Criminalizes other money laundering, including terrorism-related: Yes

On November 9, 2006, Section 218-3 of the Criminal Code was modified to adopt an "all crimes" approach to money laundering. In August 2009, Monaco passed Act 1.362 relating to money laundering, terrorist financing and corruption and promulgated Sovereign Order 2.318 setting conditions for the application of Act 1.362. The legislation includes provisions addressed by the third European Directive on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing.

Criminalizes terrorist financing: Yes

In 2002, the GOM passed Act 1.253 and promulgated two Sovereign Orders intended to implement UNSCR 1373 by outlawing terrorism and its financing. Monaco passed additional Sovereign Orders later in 2002, importing into Monegasque law the obligations of the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism. In 2006, Monaco further amended domestic law to implement these obligations. Monaco has also enacted domestic measures providing a legal basis for the freezing of terrorist funds. Monaco has not conducted any terrorist financing investigations or prosecutions to date.

Know-your-customer rules: Yes

Act 1.362 institutes procedural requirements regarding client identification. Banking laws do not allow anonymous accounts, but the Government of Monaco (GOM) does permit account owners to use pseudonyms in lieu of their real names. The banks do know the identities of the customers and retain client identification information. Article 3 of Sovereign Order 2318 of August 2009 clarifies the circumstances under which contractually-designated accounts can be used by banks.

Bank records retention: Yes

Act 1.362 establishes procedural requirements regarding retention and maintenance of records.

Suspicious transaction reporting: Yes

Monaco's AML legislation, as amended, requires banks; insurance companies; stockbrokers; corporate service providers; portfolio managers; some trustees; and institutions within the offshore sector, casinos; money remitters; real estate brokers; consultants or advisors in business, legal or tax matters; dealers in precious stones, precious materials, antiquities, fine art and other valuable assets; lawyers; notaries; and accountants to report suspicious transactions to Monaco's financial intelligence unit (FIU). In 2008, the FIU received 478 suspicious transaction reports (STRs).

Large currency transaction reporting:

No information available.

Narcotics asset seizure and forfeiture:

Monaco's legislation allows for the confiscation of property of illicit origin as well as a percentage of co-mingled illegally acquired and legitimate property. Authorities must obtain a court order to confiscate assets. Confiscation of property related to money laundering is restricted to the offenses listed in the Criminal Code.

Narcotics asset sharing authority:

Monaco and the United States signed an asset sharing agreement in March 2007.

Cross-border currency transportation requirements:

No information available.

Cooperation with foreign governments (including refusals):

In June 2007, the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters entered into force in Monaco. Monaco has concluded 15 extradition treaties with various countries. To date, there have been three extraditions on the grounds of money laundering; two were extradited from Monaco and one was extradited to Monaco.

U.S. or international sanctions or penalties: No

Enforcement and implementation issues and comments:

While the legal framework for freezing terrorist assets, to a certain extent, provides for the imposition of international sanctions and penalties under criminal law in the event of noncompliance, the mechanism does not apply to persons, groups, or entities within the EU. Monaco also lacks specific mechanisms for examining and acting on freezing procedures initiated by other countries.

Monaco's FIU forwards STRs to the prosecutor when there is evidence of money laundering, terrorist financing or corruption. Four prosecutions for money laundering have taken place in Monaco, resulting in three convictions.

U.S.-related currency transactions:

No information available.

Records exchange mechanism with U.S.:

The Principality of Monaco signed an agreement on exchange of information with the United States on September 8, 2009.

International agreements:

Monaco is party to several EU agreements and conventions that provide for mutual legal assistance and information exchange. The Principality of Monaco has signed 13 agreements on information exchange. Monaco's FIU has signed information exchange agreements with over 29 foreign FIUs.

The Principality of Monaco is a party to:

* the UN Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism--Yes

* the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime--Yes

* the 1988 UN Drug Convention--Yes

* the UN Convention against Corruption--No

Monaco is a member of the Council of Europe's Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures and the Financing of Terrorism (MONEYVAL), a Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-style regional body. Its most recent mutual evaluation can be found here: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/moneyval/Countries/Monaco_en.asp

Recommendations:

The Government of Monaco (GOM) should amend its legislation to implement full corporate criminal liability. The Principality should enhance its legal framework for freezing terrorist assets so that it applies to persons, groups, or entities within the EU and provides for specific mechanisms for acting on freezing procedures initiated by other countries. Monaco should enhance the authority of its FIU to forward reports and share financial intelligence with law enforcement and foreign FIUs even when the report or information obtained does not relate specifically to drug trafficking, organized crime, or terrorist financing. Monaco should become a party to the UN Convention against Corruption.
COPYRIGHT 2010 U.S. Department of State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Latvia-Monaco
Publication:International Narcotics Control Strategy Report
Geographic Code:4EXLA
Date:Jan 1, 2010
Words:23632
Previous Article:All money laundering and financial crimes countries/jurisdictions.
Next Article:All money laundering and financial crimes countries/jurisdictions.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters