Printer Friendly

Air pollution in a tropical city: the relationship between wind direction and lichen bio-indicators in San Jose, Costa Rica.

Urban ecology research is a relatively new field, and urban ecologists have mostly done observational studies rather than formal research linking cause and effect (Shochat et al. 2006). A key aspect of urban ecology is the flow of atmospheric gases, particularly contaminants that affect human health (Stapper 2004, Gombert et al. 2006, Leak et al. 2008, Policnik et al. 2008). Lichens are good bioindicators of "air quality" and their communities integrally reflect pollution levels (Cristofolini et al. 2008, Rojas-Fernandez et al. 2008, Lijteroff et al. 2009).

A recent book length review of lichens and monitoring (Nimis et al. 2002) shows that lichens are now widely used bio-indicators in several countries of Europe and North America. This trend may be particularly important for tropical countries where funds for ecological monitoring hardware are scarce or non-existent. Detailed protocols have been developed for a variety of purposes that go from monitoring specific chemical compounds to helping forest conservation on the basis of patterns shown by lichen communities (Nimis et al. 2002, Monnet et al. 2005, Nali et al. 2007).

The mechanisms by which contaminants affect lichens include electrical conductivity, which is reduced when the cell membranes of the thallus are degraded by air pollution (Garty et al. 2000). Antioxidant parameters of lichens can serve as indicators of rapid response to pollution stress (Weissman 2006). Standard methods have also been refined in the last decade for better determining the accumulation of various heavy metals on lichens, as in Evernia prunastri (Nimis et al. 2002, Conti et al. 2004).

Another recent global trend is the identification, modeling and recording on digital maps of changes in the lichen vegetation from urban and rural areas (Policnik et al. 2008). For example, digital models of lichen recolonization for the Ruhr Valley in Germany, show that there was little pollution in the 15th century, heavy pollution in the 20th century and again less pollution in the 21st century, thanks to recent interest in the recovery and conservation of healthy living conditions in cities and towns (Kricke & Beige 2004). Recently, digital maps have also proved appropriate to record the effects of air pollution on the biodiversity of lichens in Italy (Loppi 2004).

Atmospheric pollution in the vicinity of a tin and lead industry clearly correlated with wind patterns when studied on the lichen Canoparmelia texana (Leonardo et al. 2010).

In London and surrounding counties, pollution carried by wind explains the occurrence of two central regions with few lichens and no bryophytes, a surrounding region with a more diverse flora, including a high cover of nitrophyte-related lichens, and an outer region characterized by species absent from central London, including acidophyte lichens (Larsena et al. 2007).

In the tropics, Latin American scientists have a long trajectory of research on the relationship between lichens and air pollution (Mendez & Fournier 1980, Monge-Najera et al. 2002a, Bedregal et al. 2005), but this work has not received the attention that it deserves; for example, there are no Latin American authors in the book edited by Nimis et al. (2002), not even for the chapter on tropical lichens.

Costa Rica has had an air-monitoring program based on lichens for several decades. For example, an early study assessed air pollution in its capital city, San Jose, using three methods: the overall coverage of urban lichens on tree trunks, the changes in lichens transplanted from low-pollution areas near the city, and counts of living cells versus dead cells in lichens exposed for long periods to urban air pollution (Mendez 1977, Mendez & Fournier 1980). A decade later, using transplanted temperate lichens in a tropical habitat, Gruninger & Monge-Najera (1988) tested the European standard bio-monitoring lichen, Hypogymnia physodes, in San Jose.

In the 21st Century, Costa Rican lichenology includes a long term study of air pollution (Monge-Najera et al. 2002a) that is now in its 35th year and the development of a new method for determining pollution using lichens with half the effort required by previous methods (Monge-Najera et al. 2002b).

In this article we evaluate the hypothesis that air pollution is lower in areas where the air mass enters the Costa Rican capital (northeast) and higher where it exits (southwest).


Sampling sites: We studied the lichen cover on tree trunks in San Jose, Costa Rica, in a rectangular plot covering the area where the air enters the city (Guadalupe, Northeast) to the area where it exits (Escazu, Southwest; Lambert North Costa Rica: 527 850 East and 212 670 North, Fig. 1). The width of the plot was enough to obtain the desired population of about 200 parks.

We used public maps to find all urban parks that were large enough to have several trees with lichens (the maximal size was near 40 000[m.sup.2]). To minimize the ecological edge effect, we limited a minimum area of approximately 5 000[m.sup.2]. From the population of 200 parks, we selected a sample of 40 parks with a random sample generator (

Measurements: Following Monge-Najera et al. (2002b), in each park we identified the five trees with highest lichen coverage on their trunks. We discarded those that did not have enough space for the template and the ones with contorted trunks (trunks must be straight in the first 2m above ground because the flow of rainwater affects lichen cover) (Monge-Najera et al. 2002a,b). The five parks that had no suitable trees were replaced by others, also randomly, to reach the desired sample of 40 parks.


We used a 10 x 20cm template with 50 random points, applying it 1.5m above ground to the side with greater lichen coverage; a detailed description of the method and its validation are given elsewhere (Monge-Najera et al. 2002b).

Lichen species: In temperate countries, the species of lichens used in the surveys are usually considered individually because air pollution affects not only lichen coverage, but also species richness and composition (Nimis et al. 2002). Since identifying tropical lichen species is time consuming, and in the case of San Jose, unreliable for the lack of adequate taxonomic studies (Umana & Sipman 2002), we decided to include only the overall coverage of foliose lichens, which is an easy and reliable method for bio-monitoring air pollution (Monge-Najera et al. 2002b).

Sampling dates: In contrast with temperate lichens, some tropical species grow more during moist periods, and they are expected to be more affected by pollution during the dry season when they are stressed but active (Monge-Najera et al. 2002a, Umana & Sipman 2002). For this reason, we sampled the end of the 2008 rainy season and the end of the 2009 dry season. To reduce sampling error, we repeated the individual trees, which for this purpose were marked with numbered metal pins.

In order to analyze the trend of lichen reaction to pollution (as reflected by coverage on the trunks) in relation with park location along the wind path, we used the following adjusted multiple regression model:

Y = [[beta].sub.0] + [[beta].sub.1][X.sub.1] + [[beta].sub.2][X.sub.2] + [epsilon]


[X.sub.1] = 1 for the rainy season and -1 for the dry season

[X.sub.2] = distance (km) from a reference line at air's entry point

Y = lichen cover on trunks (percentage)

This regression has the advantage of considering any "statistical noise" that season might have on the variable that we wanted to measure: the effect of distance from the source of pollution, in this case, smog from the city vehicles, which are the main source of air pollution in San Jose (Brighigna et al. 2002, Monge-Najera et al. 2002a).


The phorophites belonged to these species: Acnistus arborescens, Bauhinia purpurea, Callistemon viminales, Cassia fistula, Cedrela odorata, Chrysophyllum cainito, Citrus sinensis, Cojoba arborea, Cupressus lusitanica, Delonix regia, Enterolobium cyclocarpum, Eriobotrya japonica, Erythrina berteroana, Eucaliptus sp, Ficus benjamina, Fraxinius udhei, Hymenaea courbaril, Jacaranda mimosaefolia, Macadamia intergrifolia, Mangifera indica, Mauria heterophylla, Persea caerulea, Phoenix canariensis, Pinus sp., Quercus costaricensis, Spathodea campanulata, Tabebuia rosea, Terminalia catappa, Trichilia havanensis and Veitchia arecina.


The distance and the season explained 13.8% of the changes in lichen coverage on the tree trunks of the city ([r.sup.2]=0.138). This percentage can be considered a very good correlation, especially if one considers the high local variability in lichen coverage within the sampled area (Fig. 2).

Independent of the season, coverage was reduced from northeast to southwest, on average, 1.34 percentage points per kilometer. Therefore slightly polluted parks predominated in the Northeast (wind input to the city) and heavily contaminated parks in the Southwest (Fig. 2), where the air mass leaves the city after collecting a load of pollutants from vehicle exhausts.

Regardless of the distance from the wind's point of entry, during the dry season the lichen coverage was 6.78 percentage points lower than the mean (Fig. 2).


Few recent authors have denied that the wind carries atmospheric pollutants and that this is reflected in the lichens' cover. One of those exceptions is the team led by Marques et al. (2009), which reported that when Parmelia sulcata transplants were placed to allow different routes of air influx, there were no clear wind-directional effects on element accumulation. Nevertheless, they warned that their results could not be generalized to other lichen species.

On the contrary, the association between lichens and wind has been found in a variety of environments for several decades (Nimis et al. 2002). For example, in the grazing land and fields of Lincolnshire, England, where there has been a limited urban and industrial development, when compared with sources of pollution some distance from it (Seaward 1973).

The pollutants may not travel long distances when carried by the wind: Vanadium released to the atmosphere by a power plant using heavy oil as fuel was carried by the wind towards adjacent areas, accumulating in the lichen H. physodes mostly at less than 1km from the power plant (lichens collected 50km from the plant contained less than 2ppm of Vanadium; Nygarda & Harjua 1983).

Our results in Costa Rica fully agree with the generally accepted view that relative lichen cover on tree trunks reflects air pollution carried by circulating air masses (Larsena et al. 2007). In San Jose, the air collects vehicle exhaust pollutants as it moves through the city, leaving it at the Southwest area with a heavier load of contaminants, in accordance with the hypothesis proposed by Monge-Najera et al. (2002a) and tested in this study.

In Europe and other temperate regions, lichens are more affected by pollution in the rainy season, possibly because they are metabolically active and because it is the time when pollutants from domestic heating and others increase (Loppi 2010 pers. comm.). In San Jose, where neither heating nor air conditioning is necessary and there is little industrial development, the main source of air pollution is vehicle exhausts (Monge-Najera et al. 2002a).

Tropical lichens can grow rapidly (Umana & Sipman 2002) and this could explain the apparent 13.56% growth that we found a few months after the first sampling, but the growth may not be real, because this value is similar than the 11% error level of the sampling method (Monge-Najera et al. 2002b).

Regardless of the season, lichens reflected the passage of an air mass that enters San Jose with lower pollution levels and leaves the city with a high burden of contaminants. The practical implication is that the air enters the city relatively clean by the semi-rural and economically middle class area of Coronado, and reaches the developed neighborhoods of Escazu and Santa Ana with a significant amount of pollutants.

Future studies of tropical urban lichens could explore if lichen cover actually is lower in the dry season, a result that differs from reports from temperate regions and the effect that climate change may have on tropical lichens, as done for other regions by Insarov et al. (1999).


We thank Ifigenia Bustamante G. for her assistance in field work and for the identification of trees, Juan Navarro R. for his help in locating the parks, and Stefano Loppi (Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Universita di Siena, Italy), Harold Arias Leclaire (UNED, Costa Rica), Liis Marmor (Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia), Victor H. Mendez (UNED, Costa Rica) and Juri Nascimbene (Dipartimento di Biologia, Universita di Trieste, Italy) for valuable suggestions to improve an earlier draft.

Received 02-XII-2010.

Corrected 17-XII-2010.

Accepted 10-I-2011.


Bedregal, P., B. Torres, P. Mendoza, M. Ubillus, J. Hurtado, I. Maza & R. Espinoza. 2005. Uso de Usnea sp. y Tillandsia capillaris, como bioindicadores de la contaminacion ambiental en la ciudad de Lima, Peru. Informe Cientifico y Tecnologico. Instituto Peruano de Energia Nuclear, Lima, Peru.

Brighigna, L., A. Papini, S. Mosti, A. Cornia, P. Bocchini & G. Galletti. 2002. The use of tropical bromeliads (Tillandsia spp.) for monitoring atmospheric pollution in the town of Florence, Italy. Rev. Biol. Trop. 50: 577-584.

Conti, M.E., M. Tudino, J. Stripeikis & G. Cecchetti. 2004. Heavy metal accumulation in the lichen Evernia prunastri transplanted at urban, rural and industrial sites in Central Italy. J. Atmosph. Chem. 49: 83-94.

Garty, J., L. Weissman, O. Tamir, S. Beer, Y. Cohen, A. Karnieli & L. Orlovsky. 2000. Comparison of five physiological parameters to assess the vitality of the lichen Ramalina lacera exposed to air pollution. Physiol. Plant. 109: 410-418.

Gombert, S., J. Asta & M.R.D. Seaward. 2006. Lichens and tobacco plants as complementary biomonitors of air pollution in the Grenoble area (Isere, southeast France). Ecol. Indic. 6: 429-443.

Gruninger, W. & J. Monge-Najera. 1988. Use of temperate lichen Hypogymnnia physodes (Parmeliaceae) to evaluate air pollution in the Tropics. Rev. Biol. Trop. 36: 545-547.

Insarov, G.E., S.M. Semenov & I.D. Insarova. 1999. A System to Monitor Climate Change with Epilithic Lichens. Envir. Monit. Asses. 55: 279-298.

Kricke, R. & G.B. Beige. 2004. Changes in epiphytic lichen flora in urban environments. Lichens in a changing pollution environment. Engl. Nat. Res. Rep. 525: 27-30.

Larsena, R.S., J.N.B. Bellb, P.W. Jamesa, P.J. Chimonidesa, F.J. Rumseya, A. Tremperc & O.W. Purvisa. 2007. Lichen and bryophyte distribution on oak in London in relation to air pollution and bark acidity. Environm. Pollut. 146: 332-340.

Leonardo, L., B.P. Mazzillia, S.R. Damatto, M. Saikib & S.M.B. de Oliveira. 2010. Assessment of atmospheric pollution in the vicinity of a tin and lead industry using lichen species Canoparmelia texana. J. Environm. Radioact. 101: in press.

Loppi, S. 2004. Mapping the effects of air pollution, nitrogen deposition, agriculture and dust by the diversity of epiphytic lichens in central Italy. Lichens in a changing pollution environment. Engl. Nat. Res. Rep. 525: 37-41.

Marques, A.P., M.C. Freitas, T.H. Wolterbeek & T. Verburg. 2009. Parmelia sulcata lichen transplants positioning towards wind direction (Part II): element concentrations and relationships with atmospheric element deposition. J. Radioanalyt. Nucl. Chem. 281: 231-236.

Mendez, O. 1977. Los liquenes como indicadores de la contaminacion atmosferica en el area metropolitana de San Jose, Costa Rica. Tesis de licenciatura, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica.

Mendez, O. & L. Fournier. 1980. Los liquenes como indicadores de la contaminacion atmosferica en el area metropolitana de San Jose, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 28: 31-39.

Monge-Najera, J., M.I. Gonzalez, M. Rivas & V.H. Mendez. 2002a. Twenty years of lichen cover change in a tropical habitat (Costa Rica) and its relation with air pollution. Rev. Biol. Trop. 50: 309-319.

Monge-Najera, J., M.I. Gonzalez, M. Rivas & V.H. Mendez. 2002b. A new method to assess air pollution using lichens as bio-indicators. Rev. Biol. Trop. 50: 321-325.

Monnet, F., F. Bordas, V. Deluchat, P. Chatenet, M. Botineau & M. Baudu. 2005. Use of the aquatic lichen Dermatocarpon luridum as bioindicator of copper pollution. Accumulation and cellular distribution tests. Environ. Pollut. 138: 456-462.

Nali, C., E. Balducci, L. Frati, L. Paoli, S. Loppi & G. Lorenzini. 2007. Integrated biomonitoring of air quality with plants and lichens: A case study on ambient ozone from central Italy. Chemosphere 67:2169-2176.

Nimis, P.L., C. Scheidegger & P.A. Wolseley (eds.). 2002. Monitoring with Lichens. Monitoring Lichens. Kluwer, Dordrect, The Netherlands.

Nygarda S. & L. Harjua. 1983. A Study of the Short Range Pollution Around a Power Plant Using Heavy Fuel Oil by Analysing Vanadium in Lichens. Lichenologist 15: 89-93.

Policnik, H., P. Simoncic & F. Batic. 2008. Monitoring air quality with lichens: A comparison between mapping in forest sites and in open areas. Environ. Pollut. 151: 395-400.

Rojas-Fernandez, J.A., A. Balza-Quintero, V. Marcano, PA. Rojas, D. Davila-Vera, Z. Pena-Contreras, R.V. Mendoza-Briceno & E. Palacios-Pru. 2008. Metabolitos secundarios de liquenes de la zona nival de la Sierra Nevada de Merida-Venezuela y su papel en la absorcion de la radiacion ultravioleta. An. Jard. Bot. Madrid 65: 59-72.

Seaward. M.R.D. 1973. Lichen Ecology of the Scunthorpe Heathlands I. Mineral Accumulation. Lichenologist 5: 423-433.

Shochat, E., P. Warren & S.H. Faeth. 2006. Future directions in urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 661-662.

Stapper, N.J. 2004. Mapping aerial hypertrophication with epiphytic lichens as biomonitors in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW, Germany). Lichens in a changing pollution environment. Engl. Nat. Res. Rep. 525: 31-36.

Umana, L. & H. Sipman. 2002. Liquenes de Costa Rica. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Heredia, Costa Rica.

Erich Neurohr Bustamante (1), Julian Monge-Najera1 & Maria Isabel Gonzalez Lutz (2)

(1). Laboratorio de Ecologia Urbana, UNED, 2050 San Jose, Costa Rica;,

(2). Escuela de Estadistica, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San Jose, Costa Rica;
COPYRIGHT 2011 Universidad de Costa Rica
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Neurohr Bustamante, Erich; Monge-Najera, Julian; Gonzalez Lutz, Maria Isabel
Publication:Revista de Biologia Tropical
Article Type:Report
Date:Jun 1, 2011
Previous Article:Population parameters of the Pacific flagfin mojarra Eucinostomus currani (Perciformes: Gerreidae) captured by shrimp trawling fishery in the Gulf of...
Next Article:Abundancia relativa y uso de microhabitat de la rana Geobatrachus walkeri (Anura: Strabomantidae) en dos habitats en Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta,...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |