Printer Friendly

Agricultural pesticide use may be associated with increased risk of prostate cancer.

Exposure to certain agricultural pesticides may be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer among pesticide applicators, according to a large study looking at the causes of cancer and other diseases in the farming community. The study, part of a long-term examination of pesticide applicators and their spouses known as the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), appears in the May 1, 2003, issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology. The AHS is a collaborative effort involving the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

This latest report from the AHS evaluates the role of 45 pesticides and finds that only a few of them show evidence of a possible association with prostate cancer among pesticide applicators. Methyl bromide is linked to the risk of prostate cancer in the entire group, while exposure to six other pesticides is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer only among men with a family history of the disease.

"Associations between pesticide use and prostate cancer risk among the farm population have been seen in previous studies; farming is the most consistent occupational risk factor for prostate cancer," said Michael Alavanja, Dr. P.H., of NCI's Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics in Bethesda, Maryland, and principal investigator of the AHS.

The AHS, which began in 1993, is following nearly 90,000 participants from North Carolina and Iowa over time to evaluate the role of a variety of agricultural and lifestyle exposures on health. The participants are either farmers, wives of farmers, or workers who use pesticides on a regular basis.

The current study included 55,332 men who are classified as either "private pesticide applicators" (92 percent) or "commercial pesticide applicators" (8 percent). Private applicators are farmers or nursery-workers. Commercial applicators work for pest control companies or for businesses such as warehouses or grain mills that use pesticides regularly. Between 1993 and 1999, 566 new prostate cancers developed among all applicators, compared with 495 that were predicted from the incidence rates in the two states. This finding means that the risk of developing prostate cancer was 14 percent greater for the pesticide applicators than for the general population. The men in this study were followed for about 4.3 years.

Methyl bromide is a fumigant gas used nationally to protect crops from pests in the soil and to fumigate grain bins and other agricultural storage areas. The scientists found that among both North Carolina and Iowa pesticide applicators, the risk of prostate cancer rose with increasing frequency of use of methyl bromide and with longer lifetime exposure to this pesticide. Elevated risks were seen only at the two highest levels of exposure (out of five possible levels). Risks were two to four times higher than among men who were not exposed to methyl bromide. On the basis of animal studies, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) lists methyl bromide as a potential occupational carcinogen.

"We cannot rule out the possibility that our observation occurred by chance alone," cautioned Aaron Blair, Ph.D. M.P.H., chief of the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch in NCI's Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, and an author of the current study. "Clearly, these findings need to be replicated. But, the internal consistency of our findings does not allow us to dismiss these results."

The researchers found another link between pesticides and prostate cancer: Among men with a family history of prostate cancer, exposure to six pesticides--chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, fonofos, phorate, permethrin, and butylate--was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. This effect was not seen among those without a family history. A finding of this type--that is, something appearing in only a subgroup of the entire study population--is particularly difficult to interpret, since it could result from chance or from differences among subgroups other than use of pesticides. Four of the pesticides, however--chlorpyrifos, coumaphos, fonofos, and phorate--are thiophosphates and share a common chemical structure. These findings suggest that certain pesticides may interact with a particular form of one or more genes shared by men with a family history of prostate cancer, making the men more susceptible to developing the disease.

The most consistent risk factors associated with prostate cancer are age, family history, and African-American ethnicity. Hormonal factors and high levels of animal fat and red meat in the diet are also suspected risk factors. Several previous occupational studies have linked farming to prostate cancer risk. A wide variety of environmental exposures occur in the farming community, however (e.g., pesticides, engine exhausts, solvents, dusts, animal viruses, fertilizers, fuels, and specific microbes), making it difficult for researchers in previous studies to sort out which factors are linked to specific diseases. Because of the large size of the AHS population and the detailed information on specific exposures and risk factors collected by the AHS researchers, it is possible to evaluate the risks associated with a number of specific chemical exposures.

As the study continues and participants age, many new cases of cancer and other diseases will develop. With time, the researchers will be able to confirm or refute the current findings, assess additional relationships between exposures and diseases, and search for possible genetic links to the variety of environmental exposures in the farming community.
COPYRIGHT 2004 National Environmental Health Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EH Update
Publication:Journal of Environmental Health
Date:Jan 1, 2004
Words:881
Previous Article:Mold can grow in the absence of visible moisture intrusion.
Next Article:Arsenic-eating bacteria may clean mines and save lives.
Topics:


Related Articles
Environmental pesticide illness and injury: the need for a national surveillance system.
Occupational Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Pesticides and the Potential for Developing Hormonal Cancers.
Occupational Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Pesticides and the Potential for Developing Hormonal Cancers.
Ag chemicals may cause prostate cancer. (Farm Harm).
Passing along pesticides: lymphoma rises in children of applicators.
Developing a comprehensive pesticide health effects tracking system for an urban setting: New York City's approach.
The monster in the closet: mothballs' link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Pesticides and neurologic symptoms.
Regression analysis of pesticide use and breast cancer incidence in California Latinas.
Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to cyanazine in the Agricultural Health Study.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |