Printer Friendly

Affirmation of the Greater East Asia War.

Novelist and onetime Marxist, friend and sometime mentor to Yukio Mishima, Fusao Hayashi (1903-1905) is a case in point. Purged as a right-wing militarist by the Occupation (which subsequently purged some 13,000 Japanese on suspicion of Communist affiliation), he went on to publish a two-volume Affirmation of the Greater East Asia War in the sixties. Hayashi's astonishingly witty affirmation is controversial across the political spectrum. Even postwar Greater East Asianists would modify his claim that, "although the Greater East Asia War seemed, in form, to be a war of aggression, it was in essence a war of liberation." They would agree that the Sino-Japanese and Russo-Japanese wars were undertaken in self-defense and, furthermore, had positive effects on anticolonial struggles in China and India, but they argue that the subsequent annexation of Korea and the various China incidents were the work of runaway militarists who distorted the defensive/emancipatory agenda. Hayashi's response was that the Manchuria and China incidents were the result, not the cause, of the war between the United States and Japan. That war, he claimed, began with the 1905 Portsmouth (New Hampshire) Treaty ending the Russo-Japanese War, a treaty embodying Theodore Roosevelt's imperialist and increasingly anti-Japanese agenda.

COPYRIGHT 1991 The Nation Company L.P.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1991 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

 
Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Field, Norma
Publication:The Nation
Article Type:Book Review
Date:Dec 23, 1991
Words:200
Previous Article:Japan's Last War: World War II and the Japanese, 1931-45.
Next Article:Chieko and Other Poems of Takamura Kotaro.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters