Adultery and Divorce in Calvin's Geneva.
Kingdon begins with a wonderfully clear summary of the Consistory's structure and purposes that provides a necessary context for each case. Because the Consistory was designed to control human behavior, he sees its operation as a valuable window on attitudes during the Reformation. In particular, its varied treatment of divorce cases illuminates both the changing attitudes during that time and the complex social and cultural environment in which reformers functioned. In order to enhance the idea of an evolution in attitudes, Kingdon places the studies in roughly chronological order. Each example also highlights different circumstances which could lead, and in these cases did lead, to divorce. Beginning with the first fully documented case, that of Pierre Ameaux, Kingdon stresses the interaction of social responsibilities, cultural standards, and personal preferences in troubled marriages. Through all the cases, two persistent themes emerge. The first is the diversity of the Consistory's response. Although it generally worked to perpetuate marriage as an institution, its treatment of the parties involved varied greatly, depending on their personal circumstances and perceived moral standards as well as the political pressures the Consistory faced. While adultery would appear to be the unforgivable sin and cause an automatic divorce, Kingdon stresses the Consistory's unwillingness to accept an accusation of infidelity without substantial proof; if repeated evidence was provided, however, women could face the death penalty, a verdict strongly supported by ministers such as Calvin. Calvin himself is present throughout this work and acts as the second theme. Not only is he involved in these cases as a minister, but he is personally affected by divorce when his brother, Antoine, with whom he lives, divorces Anne Le Fert in 1557. Calvin's unsavory role in his brother's marital tensions and eventual divorce vividly illustrates the effects a troubled couple could have on those regularly interacting with them.
Kingdon's work complements his own broader studies of Geneva as well as those made by E. William Monter and William Naphy, and his has a wider application than the title may suggest. Through his analyses of marriage and punishment he puts Geneva back into the debates over the Reformation's social impact and confessionalization. When combined with his lucidity and storytelling ability, these qualities make this book a superb source for both classroom instruction and the Reformation specialist.
KATHRYN A. EDWARDS University of Southern Mississippi
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Edwards, Kathryn A.|
|Article Type:||Book Review|
|Date:||Mar 22, 1998|
|Previous Article:||In and Out of the Ghetto: Jewish-Gentile Relations in Late Medieval and Early Modern Germany|
|Next Article:||Christian Plain Style: The Evolution of a Spiritual Ideal.|