Printer Friendly

Additivity of pyrethroid actions on sodium influx in cerebrocortical neurons in primary culture.

BACKGROUND: Pyrethroid insecticides bind to voltage-gated sodium channels and modify their gating kinetics, thereby disrupting neuronal function. Although previous work has tested the additivity of pyrethroids in vivo, this has not been assessed directly at the primary molecular target using a functional measure.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the potency and efficacy of 11 structurally diverse food-use pyrethroids to evoke sodium ([Na.sup.+]) influx in neurons and tested the hypothesis of dose additivity for a mixture of these same 11 compounds.

METHODS: We determined pyrethroid-induced increases in [Na.sup.+] influx in primary cultures of cerebrocortical neurons using the [Na.sup.+]-sensitive dye sodium-binding benzofuran isophthalate (SBFI). Concentration-dependent responses for 11 pyrethroids were determined, and the response to dilutions of a mixture of all 11 compounds at an equimolar mixing ratio was assessed. Additivity was tested assuming a dose-additive model.

RESULTS: Seven pyrethroids produced concentration-dependent, tetrodotoxin-sensitive [Na.sup.+] influx. The rank order of potency was deltamethrin > S-bioallethrin > [beta]-cyfluthrin > [lambda]-cyhalothrin > esfen-valerate > tefluthrin > fenpropathrin. Cypermethrin and bifenthrin produced modest increases in [Na.sup.+] influx, whereas permethrin and resmethrin were inactive. When all 11 pyrethroids were present at an equimolar mixing ratio, their actions on [Na.sup.+] influx were consistent with a dose-additive model.

CONCLUSIONS: These data provide in vitro relative potency and efficacy measurements for 7 pyrethroid compounds in intact mammalian neurons. Despite differences in individual compound potencies, we found the action of a mixture of all 11 pyrethroids to be additive when we used an appropriate statistical model. These results are consistent with a previous report of the additivity of pyrethroids in vivo.

KEY WORDS: additivity, efficacy, potency, pyrethroid, sodium influx. Environ Health Perspect 119:1239-1246 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003394 [Online 10 June 2011]

Pyrethroids are synthetic insecticidal compounds that resemble pyrethrins-natural toxins present in the flowers of Chrysanthemum species. Pyrethroids are used worldwide to control insect pests (Casida and Quistad 1998), and the use of pyrethroids has increased by as much as 25% since 2000 (Amweg et al. 2005; Spurlock and Lee 2008; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1999). This increased use carries the potential for increased human exposure, including pregnant women, infants, and children, to individual or multiple pyrethroid compounds (Morgan et al. 2007; Whyatt et al. 2002).

Based on their chemical structure and signs of toxicity at high doses (Verschoyle and Aldridge 1972, 1980), pyrethroids are classified into two major groups. Type I pyrethroids lack a cyano group at the CX-carbon of the 3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol moiety and produce a poisoning syndrome consisting of hyperexcitation, tremors, and convulsions (T syndrome). Type II pyrethroids have a cyano group at the CX-carbon of the 3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol moiety and produce an acute, high-dose syndrome consisting of hypersensitivity, salivation, choreoathetosis, and clonic seizures (CS syndrome) (Soderlund et al. 2002; Wolansky and Harrill 2008).

The primary molecular targets underlying pyrethroid-induced toxicity are voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) of insects and vertebrates (Narahashi 1996; Soderlund et al. 2002). Pyrethroids enhance sodium channel activity by shifting activation to more negative membrane potentials and by inhibiting channel inactivation; type II compounds typically produce longer lasting delays in channel inactivation than do type I compounds (Narahashi 1996). VGSCs are responsible for the rapid influx of sodium that underlies the rising phase of the action potential in most electrically excitable cells, including neurons, and the difference in actions of type I and type II pyrethroids on VGSC kinetics is hypothesized to contribute significantly to the T and CS syndromes (Narahashi 1992).

Recently, Wolansky et al. (2009) predicted the effects of a low-dose mixture of pyrethroid compounds on rat behavior (motor activity) using a dose-additive model. An interesting finding in that study was that both type I and type II pyrethroids were dose additive. The use of motor activity as an end point, however, has the disadvantage of being a nondiagnostic end point (i.e., activation of many neural pathways and processes decrease motor activity). Therefore, whether this in vivo finding is due to dose additivity at the molecular target (e.g., VGSCs) remains to be determined.

Little information is available regarding dose additivity of pyrethroids at VGSCs. Studies of binary combinations of pyrethroids indicate that type I and type II compounds may act competitively on VGSCs (Motomura and Narahashi 2001; Song et al. 1996), but these studies did not examine concentration-response relationships and were not designed to test the assumption of additivity. Therefore, in the present study we determined the relative potencies of 11 pyrethroids for stimulation of sodium ([Na.sup.+]) influx in cerebrocortical neurons and tested the hypothesis that alterations in [Na.sup.+] influx by a mixture of 11 pyrethroids would be dose additive.

Materials and Methods

Materials. The pyrethroids (and purity) used were deltamethrin (98.9%), [beta]-cyfluthrin (99.2%), cypermethrin (88%), permethrin (96%), bifenthrin (95%), esfenvalerate (98.6%), A.-cyhalothrin (87.7%), tefluthrin (92.6%), fenpropathrin (91.8%), resmethrin (92.3%), and S-bioallethrin (95.6%). These compounds were from the same lots used previously by Wolansky et al. (2006, 2009). Pyrethroids are chiral compounds and exist in multiple stereoisomers that have different activities on sodium channel function (Soderlund et al. 2002). Of the compounds used in the present study, only deltamethrin, bifenthrin, and tefluthrin were available as a single isomer; all other compounds were mixtures of two or more stereoisomers. Complete informarion on pyrethroid sources and isomer composition has been described by Wolansky et al. (2006) and is available in Supplemental Material (http://dx.doi. org/10.1289/ehp. 1003394). TTX was purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO) and veratridine was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Compound preparation. Each pyrethroid was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a stock concentration of 100 mM. An aliquot of stock solution of each pyrethroid was then diluted using DMSO to give a series of secondary stock solutions of 30, 10, 3, 1, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.03 mM. These secondary stock solutions were kept at -20[degrees]C in the dark. Before each experiment, an equal volume of pluronic acid F-127 (20% in DMSO; to improve the solubility of pyrethroids) was then mixed with the secondary stock solution and diluted 250 times using Locke's buffer (8.6 mM HEPES, 5.6 mM KC1, 154 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM glucose, 1.0 mM Mg[Cl.sub.2], 2.3 mM Ca[Cl.sub.2], 0.0001 mM glycine; pH 7.4). This dilution in Locke's buffer resulted in solutions of pyrethroid that were 4x the desired final concentrations. To examine the effect of a mixture of pyrethroids on sodium flux, a mixture of all 11 pyrethroids was prepared that contained equimolar concentrations (1 [micro]M) of each compound in Locke's buffer. The effects of this mixture were then tested at different dilution levels: 100%, 66%, 50%, 33%, 10%, 5%, and 1%; 0.2 % DMSO was added to separate wells as the control.

Cerebrocortical neuron culture. All animal use protocols were approved by the Creighron University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were treated humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering. Cerebrocorrical neuron cultures were obtained from embryonic day 16 Swiss-Webster mice as described previously (Cao et al. 2008). Cerebrocortical cultures were used in experiments between 8 and 10 days in vitro.

Sodium influx measurement. Neuronal intracellular [Na.sup.+] concentration ([Na.sup.+],) was determined by sodium-binding benzofuran isophthalate (SBFI) fluorescence measurement as described previously (Cao et al. 2008). The background fluorescence of each well was measured in a FLEXstation II (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) before dye loading. Cells were then incubated for 1 hr at 37[degrees]C with dye loading buffer (50 [micro]L/well) containing 10[micro]M SBFI acetoxymethyl ester (AM) and 0.02% Pluronic F-127 and then washed five times with Locke's buffer, leaving a final volume of 150 [micro]L in each well. Cells were excited at 340 and 380 nm using a FLEXstation II, and [Na.sup.+]-bound SBFI emission was detected at 505 nm. Fluorescence readings were taken once every 5 sec for 1 min to establish the baseline; 50 pL of test compound solution (4x) was then added to each well, yielding a final volume of 200 pL. The cells were exposed to test compounds for another 4.5 min.

Statistical analysis. For sodium influx data, fluorescence values over time were summed and rhe baseline subtracted. We determined the actions of tetrodotoxin (TTX) on [Na.sup.+] influx using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by comparisons between specified treatment groups using a Bonferroni comparison. To determine the relative potency of each chemical and test for additivity, we applied the flexible single-chemical required method of analysis (Gennings et al. 2004) to the data, because preliminary analysis indicated that the concentration responses for each chemical did not have a common maximum effect parameter (i.e., they had distinct efficacies). Details of the analysis strategy are provided in the Supplemental Material (http://dx.doi. org/10.1289/ehp. 1003394). This approach has been demonstrated to be suitable for examining additivity of complex mixtures, including those that may contain one or more components that are inactive or have little activity (Crofton et al. 2005; Moser et al. 2005, 2006). The full model (a nonlinear logistic model parameterized as given in Supplemental Material, Equation 2) was used to simultaneously fit all of the single chemical data as well as the fixed-ratio mixture data. For parsimony, using a backward elimination criterion, the chemicals were grouped based on their maximum effect parameter (i.e., chemicals with similar maximum effect parameter estimates were grouped to have a common parameter) thereby reducing the number of parameters. The output of the full model was used to calculate EC30 (30% effective concentration) values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each individual pyrethroid that had a significant concentration-response relationship.

(The [EC.sub.30] was defined as the concentration of pyrethroid that induced 30% of the maximal [Na.sup.+] influx based on the estimated range of the data.) We selected the [EC.sub.30] because this parameter has been used previously to determine relative potencies for pyrethroids (Wolansky et al. 2006, 2009). Thus, our metric for relative potency comparisons are the same as those used previously. Based on these EC30 values, the relative potencies of the individual chemicals were determined using deltamethrin as an index chemical. We selected deltamethrin as an index chemical because a) there is an extensive in vitro and in vivo database for this compound, b) it was the most potent compound in this assay, and c) it previously has been used as an index chemical in other comparisons of relative potency (Wolansky et al. 2006) and mixture effects (Wolansky et al. 2009). A reduced model was estimated under the hypothesis of additivity using all of the data, but only single-chemical model parameters were used when the prediction under additivity was used for the mixture data (see Supplemental Material, Equation 3). That is, the reduced model simultaneously estimated concentration-response curves for the single chemicals, and used these to predict the mixture concentration-response curve using dose addition. We compared the actual mixture data with the predicted mixture concentration-response curve, and we used a likelihood ratio test to test the hypothesis of additivity using an F-distribution.

Results

Pyrethroids produce sodium influx in cerebrocortical neurons. A comprehensive study of the relative potencies of pyrethroids on VGSCs in intact mammalian neurons has not previously been undertaken. We therefore compared the ability of 11 structurally diverse food-use pyrethroids to evoke sodium influx in cerebrocortical neurons using SBFI, a sodium-sensitive fluorescent dye. Seven of the 11 pyrethroids tested (tefluthrin, deltamethrin, [lambda]-cyhalothrin, [beta]-cyfluthrin, esfenvalerate, S-bioallethrin, and fenpropathrin) produced a rapid and concentration-dependent elevation in neuronal [Na.sup.+] influx (Figure 1). The maximum responses for [Na.sup.+] influx produced by pyrethroids were all lower than that of 10 [micro]M veratridine (Figure 1A), a plant-derived sodium channel neurotoxin site 2 agonist. Two of the 11 pyrethroids tested, cypermethrin and bifenthrin, caused only modest increases in [Na.sup.+] flux, and two others, resmethrin and permethrin, did not stimulate [Na.sup.+] influx.

To confirm the role of VGSCs in pyrethroid-induced increases of [Na.sup.+] influx, we examined the influence of TTX (1 [micro]M) on the responses produced by the nine active pyrethroids (10 [micro]M). All compounds except cypermethrin produced statistically significant increases in [Na.sup.+] influx (Figure 2). TTX eliminated this pytethroid-induced Na+ influx, including the modest [Na.sup.+] influx produced by bifenthrin and cypermethrin. These results demonstrate that the observed elevation of neuronal [[Na.sup.+].sub.i] - induced by these nine pyrethroids depended on the activation of TTX-sensitive VGSCs.

The concentration-response relationships for all 11 pyrethroids are illustrared in Figure 3, and Table 1 provides the model parameters for the 11 individual compounds. Fenpropathrin and S-bioallethrin had the smallest estimated maximum effect parameter (113.7; i.e., roughly a 14% increase above control; see [[alpha].sub.6,10], in parameters in Table 1), followed by [beta]-cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, and esfcnvalerate (with maximum effects approximately 20% above control; see [[alpha].sub.1,4,5]); [lambda]-cyhalothrin, tefluthrin, and the mixture produced the highest maximum increases, estimated to be about 27% above control [[alpha].sub.7,11, mix]. These data indicate that pyrethroids have distinct efficacies. Four compounds- cypermethrin, bifenthrin, permethrin, and resmethrin-did not produce significant concentration-response profiles. The small, TTX-sensitive increases in [Na.sup.+] influx caused by cypermethrin and bifenthrin were not sufficient to model a concentration-response relationship to quantify their potency. The rank order of potency for the remaining seven compounds was deltamethrin > S-bioallethrin > [beta]-cynuthrin > [lambda]-cyhalothrin > esfenvalerate > tefluthrin > fenpropathrin (Table 2).

Permethrin acts as a low-efficacy partial agonist in the presence of deltamethrin. Permethrin and resmethrin were without detectable actions on [Na.sup.+] influx; thus, we sought to confirm that they interacted with VGSCs in mouse neurons. Jacques et al. (1980) demonstrated that although cypermethrin and bioresmethrin did not potentiate veratridine-induced 22[Na.sup.+] uptake in neuroblastoma cells, they did produce a concentration-dependent reduction of 22[Na.sup.+] uptake induced by a combination of veratridine and kadethrin. We therefore tested the influence of different concentrations of permethrin on deltamethin-induced sodium influx to confirm that pennethrin interacts with VGSCs in our preparation. Permethrin produced a concentration-dependent right-ward shift of deltamethrin concentration-response curves for sodium influx (Figure 4A). Accordingly, we analyzed these data by Schild regression. The slope value from the linear regression was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.99-1.21), indicating that permethrin, although lacking efficacy, interacts competitively with the same site on the sodium channel fJ-subunit as deltamethrin. The affinity of permethrin derived from the Schild [pA.sub.2] value was 4.43 pM (95% CI, 3.88-5.04) (Figure 4B). We therefore included permethrin, bifenthrin, cypermethrin, and resmethrin in the mixture study, even though they did not produce significant concentration-response relationships.
Table 1. Estimated model parameters from the full model for both the
single-chemical and mixture data fitted simultaneously with mean
squared error = 0.11.

Chemical                Chemical
                      abbreviation

                                           Parameter

                                    [[alpha].sub.(1,4,5)]

                                    [[alpha].sub.(6, 10)]

                                    [[alpha].sub.(7,11,mix)

B-Cyfluthrin              BCF       B, (BCF)

Bifenthrin                BIF       P2 (BIF)

Cypermethrin              CPM       [[beta].sub.3] (CPM)

Deltamethrin              DEL       [[beta].sub.4] (DEL)

Esfenvalerate             ESF       [[beta].sub.5] (ESF)

Fenpropathrin             FEN       [[beta].sub.6] (FEN)

[lambda]-Cyhalothrin      LCH       [[beta].sub.7] (LCH)

Permethrin                PER       [[beta].sub.8] (PER)

Resmethrin                RES       [[beta].sub.9] (RES)

[delta]-Bioallethrin      S-BIO       [[beta].sub.10] (S-BIO)

Tefluthrin                TEF       [[beta].sub.11] (TEF)

Mixture                 Mixture     [[theta].sub.mix]

Chemical                Full                     Additivity
                        model                      model

                      Estimate   SE   p-Value   Estimate    SE

                         119.9  0.71   <0.001       119.9  0.79

                         113.7  1.06   <0.001       119.7  1.16

                         126.9  0.95   <0.001       127.7  1.27

B-Cyfluthrin              0.40  0.08   <0.001        0.40  0.08

Bifenthrin                   0                          0

Cypermethrin                 0                          0

Deltamethrin              0.65  0.10   <0.001        0.65  0.10

Esfenvalerate             0.32  0.06   <0.001        0.32  0.06

Fenpropathrin             0.19  0.06    0.001        0.19  0.05

[lambda]-Cyhalothrin      0.39  0.06   <0.001        0.38  0.07

Permethrin                   0                          0

Resmethrin                   0                          0

[delta]-Bioallethrin      0.43  0.13   <0.001        0.46  0.14

Tefluthrin                0.23  0.04   <0.001        0.22  0.03

Mixture                   0.28  0.03   <0.001

The full model is given in Supplemental Material, Equation 2
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003394). There is no significant
departure from additivity using a likelihood ratio test [F= 0.55;
df = (1,428); p = 0.459].

Table 2. Estimated EC30 values (with large sample 95% CIs) and relative
potencies for each of the 11 pyrethroids.

Chemical              [EC.sub.30]    95% CI      Relative
                        estimate                    potency (a)
                          (nM)

[beta]-Cyfluthrin        1,046      645-1,447      0.61

Bifenthrin

Cypermethrin

Deltamethrin              635        438-832       1.00

Esfenvalerate            1,301      793-1,809      0.49

Fenpropathrin            2,047      819-3,274      0.31

[lambda]-Cyhalothrin     1,101      765-1,437      0.58

Permethrin

Resmethrin

S-Bioallethrin            932       389-1,475      0.68

Tefluthrin               1,891     1,317-2,464     0.34

Mixture                  1,568     1,279-1,857     0.41

(a) Relative potencies for the effects of 11 pyrethroids on [Na.sup.+]
influx based on deltamethrin (EC30 = 635 nM) as the index chemical.
Relative potency was calculated as the ratio of the [EC.sub.30] for
deltamethrin over the [EC.sub.30] for each chemical. The EC30 values
and 95% CIs were determined from the four to seven measurements
presented in Figure 1.


Effects of the pyrethroid mixture on [Na.sup.+] influx in cerebrocortical neurons. A mixture of all 11 pyrethroids produced an increase in intracellular [Na.sup.+] that was both rapid and efficacious (Figure 5). Using the flexible single-chemical required method of testing additivity, data are consistent with dose additivity (Figure 6; hypothesis of additivity is not rejected; p = 0.459). The similarity of the parameter estimates for the full model compared with the reduced model (Table 1) demonstrate the predictability of the mean responses for the mixture data using dose addition and single-chemical information.

Discussion

Expetiments in the present study were designed to test the hypothesis that the actions of a pyrethroid mixture on [Na.sup.+] influx in mammalian neurons could be predicted by a dose-additive model. To test this hypothesis, we first needed to determine the concentration-response relationship for each of the individual pyrethroids in the mixture. Using the same 11 pyrethroids that have previously been tested individually (Wolansky et al. 2006) and in mixtures (Wolansky et al. 2009) in vivo, we demonstrated that they stimulate TTX-sensitive [Na.sup.+] influx in primary cultures of cerebrocortical neurons with differing potencies and efficacies. Of the 11 compounds examined, 7 caused concentration-dependent increases in [Na.sup.+] influx, whereas 2 compounds (cypermethrin and bifenthrin) caused small increases, and 2 (permethrin and resmethrin) were without effect. When the action of an equimolar mixture of these 11 pyrethroids on Na+ influx was assessed, the effect of the mixture was predicted by a dose-additive model. This is consistent with the results of an in vivo mixture study using motor activity as an end point (Wolansky et al. 2009) and indicates that both the behavioral and pharmacological effects of pyrethroid mixtures are dose additive.

VGSCs are well-established targets of pyrethroid effects and clearly contribute to the insecticidal and toxicological actions of these compounds (Narahashi 1996). Thus, effects of individual pyrethroids and pyrethroid mixtures on VGSCs reflect the actions of these compounds at a key molecular target relevant to their toxicity. The use of a sodium-sensitive fluorescent dye allowed us to determine the effects of 11 pyrethroids in a high-throughput manner without disruption of cellular integrity, as described previously (Cao et al. 2008). This pyrethroid-induced [Na.sup.+] influx depended on the activation of TTX-sensitive VGSCs inasmuch as the response was abrogated by TTX, a sodium channel blocker. The ability of SBFI measurements to detect deltamethrin effects in the nanomolar range indicates that this assay is similar in sensitivity to membrane potential (Eells et al. 1993), 22[Na.sup.+] flux (Ghiasuddin and Soderlund 1985), and electrophysiological (Meyer et al. 2008; Shafer et al. 2008) measures, all of which also detect deltamethrin effects in the nanomolar range.

The relative potencies observed in the present in vitro study are not identical to those reported by Wolansky et al. (2006). In that in vivo study, type II compounds were generally more potent than type I compounds in both [Na.sup.+] influx and motor activity assays. However, the range of relative potencies was much larger in vivo [230-fold (Wolansky et al. 2006)] than in vitro [3.3-fold present study)], and the rank order of relative potencies in vitro differs from that observed in vivo. Several factors are likely to account for these differences. The smaller range of relative potencies in vitro reflects the fact that potencies could not be determined for four of the compounds tested. These included three (permethrin, resmethrin, and cypermethrin) of the least potent compounds in vivo (Wolansky et al. 2006); thus, the range of relative potencies in vitro may have been greater if potency estimates for these compounds could have been made. The in vitro system also differs from the in vivo system in two other important aspects: it lacks significant metabolic capability, and it consists of a single tissue. The relative potencies from in vivo studies are influenced by several factors not present in vitro, including metabolism, contributions of multiple neuronal pathways, actions on a greater number of VGSC isoforms than may be present in vitro, and potentially greater contributions of secondary effects of pyrethroids (e.g., neurotransmittet release). Comprehensive data sets from other in vitro studies permitting determination of relative potencies of pyrethroids are generally lacking. We recently demonstrated that this same set of 11 pyrethroids induced [Ca.sup.2+] influx in mouse primary cultures of cerebrocortical neurons with distinct potencies (Cao et al. 2011) that are well correlated with those reported here for [Na.sup.+] influx. This is to be expected inasmuch as Ca influx is completely dependent on activation of VGSCs by pyrethroids (Cao et al. 2011). Pyrethroids also produced distinct maximum responses in the increase of neuronal [Na.sup.+] influx in cerebrocortical neurons. The different efficacies of pyrethroids on Na+ influx are consistent with previous reports that pyrethroids display distinct efficacies to either augment [3H]BTX (batrachotoxin)-specific binding (Brown et al. 1988; Trainer et al. 1993) or to elevate brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) mRNA expression levels (Imamura et al. 2006).

Four compounds (cypermethrin, bifenthrin, permethrin, and resmethrin) had little or no effect on [Na.sup.+] influx in the present study. Cypermethrin and bifenthrin caused small TTX-sensitive responses, indicating that they do interact with VGSCs in cortical neurons, but did not produce a response of sufficient magnitude to be fitted by a logistic concentration-response function. These two compounds also elicited TTX-sensitive [Ca.sup.2+] influx in cerebrocorrical neurons (Cao et al. 2011), which further indicates that they activate VGSCs. Our demonstration of the ability of permethrin to antagonize deltamethrin-induced VGSC activation indicates that permethrin also interacts with VGSCs in cerebrocortical neurons. These results agree with reports of an interaction between type I and type II pyrethroids on both whole-cell (Song et al. 1996) and single-channel (Motomura and Narahashi 2001) sodium currents. Similarly, permethrin was unable to either augment [3H]BTX-specific binding (Brown et al. 1988; Trainer et al. 1993) or stimulate BDNF mRNA expression in neurons (Imamura et al. 2006). These data are consistent with results in neuroblastoma cells showing that cw-permethrin and bioresmethrin inhibited 22[Na.sup.+] influx induced by a combination of veratridine and kadethrin (Jacques et al. 1980), and with a report by Brown et al. (1988) demonstrating that permethrin produced a concentration-dependent reversal of deltamethrin-induced stimulation of [3H]BTX-specific binding to VGSCs. Thus, in a variety of in vitro preparations, permethrin and resmethrin are inactive alone but clearly interact with VGSCs. These data parallel an earlier report (Cao et al. 2008) demonstrating partial agonism at neurotoxin site 5 in that treatment of neurons with a combination of a high-efficacy activator (brevetoxin 1) and a low-efficacy activator (gambierol) resulted in an inhibition of the response to the high-efficacy compound by the low-efficacy compound. This profile for permethrin is therefore typical of a low-efficacy partial agonist that can behave as an inhibitor in the presence of a high-efficacy agonist (Cao et al. 2008). Moreover, the inference that permethrin behaves as a low-efficacy agonist is consistent with studies that demonstrate that permethrin increases open probability of VGSCs.

Although previous studies have indicated that interactions between pyrethroids occur in vitro, they have not rigorously tested the hypothesis of additivity or examined interactions between multiple pyrethroids. The present study was designed specifically to test the hypothesis of dose additivity for the effects of multiple pyrethroids. Each compound was present in the mixture at an equimolar concentration (- 1 [micro]M at the highest mixture dilution), which was [less than or equal to] EC30 values for six of the seven individual compounds. Thus, the concentrations used in the mixture were relatively low on the concentration-effect curves for each individual compound. In addition, the mixture contained four compounds that were without significant concentration-response effects on [Na.sup.+] influx. The mixture caused concentration-dependent increases in [Na.sup.+] influx, with a maximal effect that was equivalent to the most efficacious of the individual compounds. Thus, the hypothesis that pyrethroid actions on Na+ influx were dose additive was not rejected. The effects of mixtures of pyrethroids are therefore additive at the behavioral (Wolansky et al. 2009) as well as the cellular level. The statistical model used in the present study is well suited for predicting the additivity of mixtures that contain components that vary widely in their activity, from very active to completely inactive (Crofton et al. 2005), such as shown here with the pyrethroids. In this case, the four compounds present were of such low activity that potency values could not be estimated. One (permethrin) inhibited deltamethrin actions when these two compounds were present in a binary mixture. In the 11-chemical mixture, the net effect of all the compounds in the mixture did not differ from additivity; this result reflects the combined action of all 11 compounds but does not make any predictions or conclusions regarding the interactions of individual pairs of compounds in the mixture. If the objective of the present study were to identify and characterize the interaction profile of all chemicals, the study design and size would be much larger: A factorial design with only three levels of each compound would require [3.sup.11] = 177,147 dose groups. With only two dose groups per chemical, 2,048 dose groups would be required for a full factorial design. The fixed-ratio ray design used here is a more focused and efficient design to test for departure from additivity at relevant mixtures of interest. Its limitation is that subsets of the 11 chemicals may interact, but the overall impact agrees with additivity. The design and analysis strategy herein cannot detect or characterize this scenario.

Our results differ from previous reports where actions of pyrethroids on single-channel (Song and Narahashi 1996) or whole-cell (Song et al. 1996) sodium currents as well as large-conductance chloride channels (Burr and Ray 2004) appeared to be antagonistic between type I and type II compounds. They also differ from one report that deltamethrin and S-bioallethrin, at doses that exceeded the LD50 (dose lethal to 50%) value, did not produce effect-additive or antagonistic changes in blood pressure, electromyograms, or hippo-campal electrophysiological responses (Ray et al. 2006). However, these studies (Burr and Ray 2004; Ray et al. 2006; Song and Narahashi 1996; Song et al. 1996) did not rigorously test the hypothesis of additivity because of limitations in study design and/or the statistical approach. Dose or effect additivity, synergism, or antagonism between mixtures of chemicals can be reliably determined only by hypothesis testing using rigorous statistical models (Feron and Groten 2002; Gennings et al. 2004; Hertzberg and Teuschler 2002; LeBlanc and Olmstead 2004; Teuschler 2007).

Pyrethroid compounds are chiral and their stereoisomers have differing activities toward VGSCs (Lund and Narahashi 1982). Of the compounds used in the present study, only three (deltamethrin, bifenthrin, and tefulthrin) were single stereoisomers [see Supplemental Material, Table 1 (http:// dx.doi.org/10.1 289/ehp. 1003394)1. We tested each compound individually as a single stereoisomer or group of stereoisomers and then tested the same single stereoisomer or group of stereoisomers in the 11-pyrethroid mixture. The statistical model used data from the individual compounds (whether a single stereoisomer or group of stereoisomers) to predict the dose-additive response and then determined whether the mixture effects significantly differed from this predicted response. In the present study, the results did not differ significantly from additivity, irrespective of the mixture of stereoisomers present.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that pyrethroids stimulate [Na.sup.+] influx in mammalian neurons with distinct potencies and efficacies. Moreover, we demonstrate that alterations in [Na.sup.+] influx by a mixture of food-use pyrethroids can be predicted using a dose-additive model. This is consistent with the actions of these compounds on VGSCs and is in accordance with in vivo studies of pyrethroid mixtures.

REFERENCES

Amweg EL, Weston DP, Ureda NM. 2005. Use and toxicity of pyrethroid pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:966-972.

Brown GB, Gaupp JE, Olsen RW. 1988. Pyrethroid insecticides: ste-reospecific allosteric interaction with the batrachotoxinin-A benzoate binding site of mammalian voltage-sensitive sodium channels. Mol Pharmacol 34:54-59.

Burr SA, Ray DE. 2004. Structure-activity and interaction effects of 14 different pyrethroids on voltage-gated chloride ion channels, Toxicol Sci 77:341-346.

Cao Z, George J, Gerwick WH, Baden DG, Rainier JD, Murray TF. 2008. Influence of lipid-soluble gating modifier toxins on sodium influx in neocortical neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:604-613.

Cao Z, Shafer TJ, Murray TF. 2011. Mechanisms of pyrethroid insecticide-induced stimulation of calcium influx in neocortical neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 336:197-205.

Casida JE, Quistad GB. 1998. Golden age of insecticide research: past, present, or future? Annu Rev Entomol 43:1-16.

Crofton KM, Craft ES, Hedge JM, Gennings C, Simmons JE, Carchman RA, et al. 2005. Thyroid-hormone-disrupting chemicals: evidence for dose-dependent additivity or synergism. Environ Health Perspect 113:1549-1554.

Eells JT, Rasmussen JL, Bandettini PA, Propp JM. 1993. Differences in the neuroexcitatory actions of pyrethroid insecticides and sodium channel-specific neurotoxins in rat and trout brain synaptosomes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 123:107-119.

Feron VJ, Groten JP. 2002. Toxicological evaluation of chemical mixtures. Food Chem Toxicol 40:825-839.

Gennings C, Carter WH Jr, Carney EW, Charles GD, Gollapudi BB, Carchman RA. 2004. A novel flexible approach for evaluating fixed ratio mixtures of full and parlial agonists. Toxicol Sci 80:134-150.

Ghiasuddin SM, Soderlund DM. 1985. Pyrethroid insecticides: potent, stereospecilic enhancers of mouse brain sodium channel activation. Pestic Biochem Physiol 24:200-206.

Hertzberg RC, Teuschler LK. 2002. Evaluating quantitative formulas for dose-response assessment of chemical mixtures. Environ Health Perspect 11 Olsuppl 6):965-970

Imamura L, Yasuda M, Kuramitsu K, Hara D, Tabuchi A, Tsuda M. 2006. Deltamethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide, is a potent inducer for the activity-dependent gene expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 316:136-143.

Jacques Y, Romey G, Cavey MT, Kartalovski B, Lazdunski M. 1980. Interaction of pyrethroids with the Na* channel in mammalian neuronal cells in culture. Biochim Biophys Acta 600:882-897.

LeBlanc GA, Olmstead AW. 2004. Evaluating the toxicity of chemical mixtures [Letter]. Environ Health Perspect 112:A729-A730.

Lund AE, Narahashi T. 1982. Dose-dependent interaction of the pyrethroid isomers with sodium channels of squid axon membranes. Neurotoxicology 3:11-24.

Meyer DA, Carter JM, Johnstone AF, Shafer TJ. 2008. Pyrethroid modulation of spontaneous neuronal excitability and neurotransmission in hippocampal neurons in culture. Neurotoxicology 29:213-225.

Morgan MK, Sheldon LS, Croghan CW, Jones PA, Chuang JC, Wilson NK. 2007. An observational study of 127 preschool children at their homes and daycare centers in Ohio: environmental pathways to cis- and trans-permethrin exposure. Environ Res 104:266-274.

Moser VC, Casey M, Hamm A, Carter WH Jr, Simmons JE, Gennings C. 2005. Neurotoxicological and statistical analyses of a mixture of five organophosphorus pesticides using a ray design. Toxicol Sci 86:101-115.

Moser VC, Simmons JE, Gennings C. 2006. Neurotoxicological interactions of a five-pesticide mixture in preweanling rats. Toxicol Sci 92:235-245.

Motomura H, Narahashi T. 2001. Interaction of tetramethrin and deltamethrin at the single sodium channel in rat hippocampal neurons. Neurotoxicology 22:329-339.

Narahashi T. 1992. Nerve membrane Na1 channels as targets of insecticides. Trends Pharmacol Sci 13:236-241.

Narahashi T. 1996. Neuronal ion channels as the target sites of insecticides. Pharmacol Toxicol 79:1-14.

Ray DE, Burr SA, Lister T. 2006 The effects of combined exposure to the pyrethroids deltamethrin and S-bioallethrin on hippocampal inhibition and skeletal muscle hyperexcitabil-ity in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 216:354-362

Shafer TJ, Rijal SO, Gross GW. 2008. Complete inhibition of spontaneous activity in neuronal networks in vitro by deltamethrin and permethrin. Neurotoxicology 29:203-212.

Soderlund DM, Clark JM, Sheets LP, Mullin LS, Piccirillo VJ, Sargent D, et al. 2002. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology 171:3-59.

Song JH, Nagata K, Tatebayashi H, Narahashi T. 1996. Interactions of tetramethrin, fenvaierate and DDT at the sodium channel in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Brain Res 708:29-37.

Song JH, Narahashi T. 1996. Modulation of sodium channels of rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons by the pyrethroid tetramethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:445-453

Spurlock F, Lee M. 2008. Synthetic Pyrethroid Use Patterns, Properties and Environmental Effects. In: Synthetic Pyrethroids: Occurrence and Behavior in Aquatic Environments (Gan J, Spurlock G, Hendley P, Weston D, eds). ACS symposium series, 991. Washington, DC:American Chemical Society, 3-25.

Teuschler LK. 2007. Deciding which chemical mixtures risk assessment methods work best for what mixtures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 223:139-147.

Trainer VL, Moreau E, Guedin D, Baden DG, Catterall WA. 1993. Neurotoxin binding and allosteric modulation at receptor sites 2 and 5 on purified and reconstituted rat brain sodium channels. J Biol Chem 268:17114-17119.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Pesticides: science policy issues related to the Food Quality Protection Act. Fed Reg 64:5796-5799. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ EPA-PEST/1999/February/Day-05/p2781.htm [accessed 27 August 2010],

Verschoyle RD, Aldridge WN. 1972. Toxicity of natural and synthetic pyrethrins to rats. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2:308-311.

Verschoyle RD, Aldridge WN. 1980. Structure-activity relationships of some pyrethroids in rats. Arch Toxicol 45:325-329.

Whyatt RM, Camann DE, Kinney PL, Reyes A, Ramirez J, Dietrich J, et al. 2002. Residential pesticide use during pregnancy among a cohort of urban minority women. Environ Health Perspect 110:507-514.

Wolansky MJ, Gennings C, Crofton KM. 2006. Relative potencies for acute effects of pyrethroids on motor function in rats. Toxicol Sci 89:271-277.

Wolansky MJ, Gennings C, DeVito MJ, Crofton KM. 2009. Evidence for dose-additive effects of pyrethroids on motor activity in rats. Environ Health Perspect 117:1563-1570.

Wolansky MJ, Harrill JA. 2008. Neurobehavioral toxicology of pyrethroid insecticides in adult animals: a critical review. Neurotoxic^ Teratol 30:55-78.

Zhengyu Cao, (1) * Timothy J. Shafer, (2) Kevin M. Crofton, (2) Chris Gennings, (3) and Thomas F. Murray (1)

(1) Creighton University, School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; (2) Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA; (3) Solveritas, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, USA

Address corresponding to T.F. Murray, Creighton University, School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Omaha, NE 68178 USA. Telephone: (402) 280-2983. Fax: (402) 280-2142. E-mail: tfmurray@creighton.edu.

* Current address: Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Supplemental Material is available online (http:// dx. doi. org/10.1289/ehp. 1003394).

This work was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under contracts PR-RT-08-00545 to T.F.M. and EP-D-08-007 to C.G.

This article has been subjected to review by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents reflect the views of the agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

C.G. is employed by Solveritas, LLC. The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Received 28 December 2010; accepted 10 June 2011.
COPYRIGHT 2011 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research
Author:Cao, Zhengyu; Shafer, Timothy J.; Crofton, Kevin M.; Gennings, Chris; Murray, Thomas F.
Publication:Environmental Health Perspectives
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Sep 1, 2011
Words:6029
Previous Article:Short-term effects of nitrogen dioxide on mortality and susceptibility factors in 10 Italian cities: the EpiAir Study.
Next Article:Exposure to PBDEs in the office environment: evaluating the relationships between dust, handwipes, and serum.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters