AdI 2005: literature and science.
Thus St. Francis looks up to the sky and invites the entire universe, and all human creatures within it, to praise the "bon Signore"; enthralled by the world's immensity, Dante likewise admires "[l]a gloria di colui che tutto move [...]." By contrast, centuries later, a more skeptical spirit, Guicciardini, casts a doubt on his predecessors' strong beliefs ("Erra chi crede che la vittoria delle imprese consista nello essere giuste e ingiuste [...]"); still later, Leopardi sees the world's "immensita" as a nothingness where his "pensiero" enjoys "naufragar"; and finally, in the 20th century, Calvino investigates the intersections between the power of the human imagination with scientific discourse, and quotes Giordano Bruno, who describes human beings' spiritus phantasticus as "'mundus quidem et sinus inexplebilis formarum et specierum' (un mondo o un golfo, mai saturabile, di forme e d'immagini)." Calvino thus formulates his position on these issues: "Ecco, io credo che attingere a questo golfo della molteplicita potenziale sia indispensabile per ogni forma di conoscenza" (Lezioni americane).
Within this interconnected context that seeks to represent and explain reality, both visible and invisible, Annali d'italianistica plans to devote, in the year 2005, its twenty-third issue to the perennial, at times uneasy, rapport linking literature and science in its unfolding throughout Italy's literary culture. The volume's editors welcome contributions that investigate, not just the presence of science in literature, but rather the epistemological and philosophical reasons for this presence, as well as the poetic manner in which scientific data, theories, and hypotheses are configured in literature; the ways in which these two disciplines exploit all human faculties--imagination, reasoning, intellect, etc.--in their respective and interrelated pursuits and discoveries, as well as the written language employed in communicating them; the ever changing challenges that new scientific data and discoveries present to literature, which has always sought to interpret and reconfigure science, whereas science seems to disregard, neglect, or even question the theoretical, ethical, epistemological, and intellectual possibilities inherent in every poetic discourse; in brief, the many areas in common and contrast between poetic and scientific discourse. Andrea Battistini, the author of many studies on literature and science, most appropriately writes: "The best approach should seek to overcome the artificial boundaries that are still set up between the two disciplines and that still continue nowadays as the heritage of Romanticism and Idealism, but also, at the same time, to recognize the peculiar and specific character of the intellectual constructs, discourse, fruition, and purposes of literature and science."
AdI invites scholars to submit essays (due March 31, 2005) on the proposed topic. Prospective authors are encouraged to contact as soon as possible the journal's Editor by e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2005|
|Previous Article:||The science of literature: revisiting Italy's "structuralist equation".|
|Next Article:||Pierpaolo Antonello and Simon A. Gilson, eds. Science and Literature in Italian Culture--From Dante to Calvino.|