Printer Friendly

Activity pattern of medium and large sized mammals and density estimates of Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) in the Brazilian Pampa/Padrao de atividade de mamiferos de medio e grande porte e estimativa da densidade de Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) no Pampa brasileiro.

1. Introduction

The activity pattern of a species is an important aspect of its ecology, reflecting physiological characteristics and ecological interactions (Tobler et al., 2009; Norris et al., 2010; Blake et al., 2012). The activity rhythm of most species is regulated by endogenous biogeochemical processes that are mostly stimulated by cyclical environmental variations, such as the daily photoperiod (Dibner et al., 2010). In general, species regulate their activity according to the daily light-dark cycle and may specialize in a particular period. This allows their classification as diurnal or nocturnal, crepuscular or even cathemeral (Mistlberger and Antle, 2011).

The circadian rhythms of mammals may also be affected by factors other than light, including food availability and social stimulus, competition, predation and maternal behavior (Mistlberger and Skene, 2004). Human disturbances, such as habitat fragmentation, tourism and hunting, can also be important factors in determining mammalian activity pattern (Kitchen et al., 2000; Martin and Reale, 2008; Norris et al., 2010). Consequently, variations in activity pattern among populations may represent strategies adopted by individuals to deal with locally limiting factors, such as ecological interactions, environmental cues and different intensities of threat.

Brazil has one of the highest mammal diversities in the world, with more than 700 species known (Paglia et al., 2012). According to Costa et al. (2005), 13% of the 66 threatened species in Brazil occur in the Pampa Biome. This region is dominated by grasslands and has been used for many generations for raising livestock. Currently, the main impacts include the expansion of soybean cultivation and silviculture based on Pinus spp. and Eucalyptus spp. (Hasenack and Cordeiro, 2006). Despite this wide array of threats, mammal surveys in the Brazilian Pampas are limited (Kasper et al., 2012a, b; Pinto and Duarte, 2013; Espinosa et al., 2016), especially regarding mammalian ecology and activity patterns.

The recent discovery of Cuniculuspaca (Linnaeus, 1766) in the Pampas (Leuchtenberger et al., 2016) underscores how poorly known is the mammalian assemblage of this biome. Although the species is widespread in Central and South America, it is threatened by hunting and habitat loss in some regions (Gudynas, 1989; Beck-King et al., 1999; Wright et al., 2000; Emmons, 2016). Cuniculus paca is one of the World's largest rodents, measuring about 70 cm long and weighting up to 10 kg (Silva, 2014). The species has a compact and sturdy body, a naked and short tail. Dorsal pelage ranges from red brown to dark chocolate with white spots on the flanks (Perez, 1992). Variations in the patterns of which can be used to identify individuals (Foster and Harmsen, 2011). Studies of C. paca activity patterns are limited (Michalski and Norris, 2011), and no standardized methodology exists to provide accurate census information; consequently population density estimates range from 3.5 to 93 ind/[km.sup.2] (Emmons, 1987; Eisenberg and Redford, 1999; Aquino et al., 2009; Santos-Moreno and Perez-Irineo, 2013; Patton, 2015).

Given the lack of information about activity patterns of mammals in the Brazilian Pampa, especially C. paca, and the importance of this knowledge for conservation management, the objectives of this study were to analyze the circadian activity pattern of medium- and large-sized mammals in a typical Pampa region in the southern Brazil, and to infer information about C. paca population density.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study areas

The study was conducted at the Passo Novo region in the municipality of Alegrete, Rio Grande do Sul State, southern Brazil (Figure 1). The study area (29[degrees]41'49"S, 55[degrees]32'11"O) is located in the Pampa Biome, according to IBGE (2004). The Pampa domain extends about 176,500 [km.sup.2] within the Brazilian territory, and comprises 63% of the land surface of Rio Grande do Sul State (IBGE, 2004). The climate is temperate wet with warm summers (Cfa, Koppen, 1948), and the landscape is comprised of extensive grasslands plains with some undulations and hills of silicified sandstone.

Vegetation of the study site is classified as grassy-woody steppe (native grassland), modified by constant cattle pasture pressure. Forested areas are limited to riparian vegetation composed of Seasonally Deciduous Alluvial vegetation (IBGE, 2012). The survey was conducted along the riparian forest of the Lajeado Grande Stream.

2.2. Data collection

A survey of medium and large mammals was conducted from July 2014 to April 2015 using two camera traps (Bushnell[R] Trophy Cam tm, model: 119436c). We established four consecutive transects of 1 km length and 1 km distant from each other. Each transect was sampled for a week per month, during 10 months, with cameras positioned 200 to 400 meters from each other. So, each transect was sampled 10 times with two cameras. This arrangement resulted in a sample effort of 534 trap nights. Camera traps were configured to take three sequential records when activated, with a minimum interval between events of 30 seconds. The camera traps remained active along 24 hours a day, and we did not use bait during sampling.

2.3. Data analysis

Activity patterns of surveyed species were analyzed using images of the same species taken at intervals of> 1h from each transect. To establish activity patterns, we analyzed the temporal patterns of records using Oriana 4.0 software (Kovach, 2011). Analysis was restricted to species with more than 10 independent photographic records.

We classified each photographic record as diurnal, nocturnal or crepuscular according with the time of local sunrise and sunset, using Moonrise 3.5 software (Sidell, 2002). We adapted the system proposed by Gomez et al. (2005) and classified the activity pattern of each species based on the percentage of independent records in each period: diurnal ([greater than or equal to] 70% of records occurring during the day), nocturnal ([greater than or equal to] 70% of records during the night), crepuscular (from 50 to 60% of records during crepuscular periods), crepuscular/nocturnal (from 60 to 70% of records during the night and crepuscular periods), crepuscular/diurnal (from 60 to 70% of records during the day and crepuscular periods) or cathemeral, when records were randomly distributed along the daily cycle. Following Gomez et al. (2005), crepuscular records were those occurring within 1h before or after sunrise or sunset.

To estimate the abundance of C. paca all non-sequential photographs at intervals [greater than or equal to] 15 min were analysed. Individuals were identified by the differences in the patterns of flank spots, which are individually unique. Such methods are commonly used for studying species with variable natural coat markings, including large cats (e.g. tiger, Panthera tigris (Linnaeus, 1758), Karanth, 1995; Karanth and Nichols, 1998; jaguar, Panthera onca (Linnaeus, 1758), Silver et al., 2004; Soisalo and Cavalcanti, 2006; Paviolo et al., 2008) and smaller species (e.g. ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Linnaeus, 1758), Bitetti et al., 2009; Kasper et al., 2015, and Geoffroy's cat, Leopardus geoffroyi (D'Orbigny & Gervais, 1844; Cuellar et al., 2006).

Consequently, it was possible to count the number of individuals and also to record where and when they were located. We just used photographs of the right flank of the animals, since this was the most recorded side and each survey station had just a single camera. Images that did not permit accurate spot pattern identification were discarded. Estimates therefore represent the minimum number of individual C. paca present at the study site during the sampling period.

For density estimation, we considered two premises: 1) C. paca is restricted to riparian forest (although individuals may use peripheral environments when moving between riparian sites); and; 2) the probability that individuals resident at the study site will not be detected during the sample period is low.

Considering that sampling units (transects) were separated by 1,000 m, we assumed a buffer zone of 500 m around each camera trap. In doing so, we assume that those individuals that use a linear home range smaller or equivalent to 500 m will be recorded at least once by one camera. The linear extension of riparian forest sampled was 4,220 m, considering the linear distance between the transect 1 and the transect 4. We added a buffer zone of 500 m (that represents a half distance between consecutive transects) before the transect 1 and after the transect 4 to obtain an effective sampled area, resulting in a total linear extension of 5,220 m. According with our first premise, we measured the area of riparian forest present in the sampling area, using Google Earth (Google Llc., 2013) and the extension Earth Point KML Shapes, which resulted in an area of 0.85 [km.sup.2]. We then estimated the minimum density of C. paca, using the number of individuals identified over the sampling period and the total extent of riparian forest cover within the study site. The camera trap images also allowed us to estimate movements for individuals recorded on more than one transect. Since the number of individuals recorded varied during each month, we also measured a monthly population density. However, although the camera stations were not equidistantly distributed spatial and temporal conclusion should be considered with caution.

Considering the population to be closed (Otis et al., 1978), we used capture/recapture analysis to estimate abundance during two periods of three consecutive months. However, due to the low rates of captures and recaptures, the deployed metric has low resolution power and our estimates should be considered carefully. We estimated population abundance using the Lincoln Petersen model, as modified by Schnabel for multiple occasions (Krebs, 1999).

3. Results

3.1. Activity pattern

We obtained 129 photographic records of10 mammal species of seven orders, of which the Carnivora was the most represented (Table 1). The most frequently recorded species were: Cuniculus paca (n = 52), Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (Linnaeus, 1766) (n = 23), Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1766) (n = 17), Mazama gouazoubira (G. Fischer [von Waldheim], 1814) (n = 10) and Conepatus chinga (Molina, 1782) (n = 10, Table 1).

Cuniculus paca, C. chinga and H. hydrochaeris were classified as nocturnal. C. thous as crepuscular/nocturnal, and M. gouazoubira as cathemeral (Table 1).

The highest number of records for Cuniculus paca occurred between 01h00min and 05h00min (N=47: 90.4%), with just five records from the crepuscular period (Figure 2A, Table 1). H. hydrochaeris had a bimodal activity pattern, with most images between 19h00min and 22h00min and 04h00min to 06h00min, plus two records at 10h00min (Figure 2B). Cerdcyon thous was recorded between 00h00min and 08h00min, with some scattered records at 18h00min and at 20h00min (Figure 2C), while M. gouazoubira was active throughout the circadian cycle, though with a larger number of records at 10h00min (Figure 2D). Conepatus chinga was recorded between 21h00min and 08h00min (Figure 2E).

3.2. Density estimates

For density estimates of C. paca we analysed 67 photographic records, of which 34 (51%) permitted accurate identification of 10 individuals. Most individuals recorded (N = 9) occurred on just one transect (Table 2), though one was recorded on two transects within a linear distance of 1,140 m. Of the ten individuals recorded, seven were registered during just 1 to 2 months and were considered transients. Three individuals were recorded during 4, 6 and 8 months and where considered to be residents (Table 2). Therefore, if only resident individuals are considered, the minimum density of this population during the monitoring period was 3.5 individuals per [km.sup.2]. For the two sampling periods (2014 and 2015), and including transient individuals, the estimated density varied from 7.1 to 8.2 ind/[km.sup.2]. Using only the number of individuals recorded monthly at the study site, the minimal average density was 2.4 ind/[km.sup.2] (SD = 1.67).

We calculated population abundance for two three-month periods (July-September 2014 and January-March 2015). During each period we recorded five individuals. Capture/recapture analysis produced a population estimate of 8 and 10 individuals for each period, respectively. These estimates allowed us to calculate respective densities of 9.4 and 11.8 individuals per [km.sup.2].

4. Discussion

In the present study, most species were recorded more frequently at night. Cuniculus paca was the most frequent recorded species. The nocturnal pattern observed for C. paca in the study area is in line with that reported by other studies (Donadio et al., 2001; Gomez et al., 2005; Michalski and Norris, 2011; Blake et al., 2012; Kasper et al., 2012b; Huck et al., 2013), although Perez (1992) had suggested a crepuscular habit for the species. At Passo Novo, most activity was recorded between 01h00min and 05h00min, with just five crepuscular records. This variation in activity may be related to regional differences.

Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris had a nocturnal activity pattern, with 17% of the records occurring during the crepuscular period. Data from other studies have found activity patterns that ranged from nocturnal (Rinaldi, 2014) to cathemeral (Rinaldi, 2014; Foster et al., 2013; Gomez et al., 2005). Rodrigues (2013) observed a relationship between capybaras activity pattern and thermal conditions. In the Pantanal, the species presented peaks of activity during the day and in the early evening, probably to avoid predation risk by the nocturnal Panthera onca and Puma concolor (Linnaeus, 1771) (Foster et al., 2013).

Cerdocyon thous showed a crepuscular/nocturnal activity pattern, with a higher concentration of records at night. The species is described as nocturnal by many authors (Courtenay and Maffei, 2004; Vieira and Port, 2007; Bitetti et al., 2009; Tortato and Althoff, 2009; Faria-Correa et al., 2009), but it is also known to forage during the day (Brady, 1979; Nascimento et al., 2004), since its activity seems to be correlated with the activity of prey. In areas with sympatry with Lycalopex gymnocercus (G. Fischer, 1814), both species may segregate their activity patterns to avoid encounters (Vieira and Port, 2007; Bitetti et al., 2009). Although L. gymnocercus was not recorded in the present study, its occurrence was expected as it is known for the region (Kasper et al., 2012a).

Mazama gouazoubira had a cathemeral activity pattern. This has also been observed by Gomez et al. (2005) in the Amazon. The cathemeral pattern is expected for such herbivorous mammals, as the strategy guarantees energetic requirements based on a low quality diet (Donati et al., 2007). However, M. gouazoubira has been recorded being primarily diurnal in the Pantanal (Chiaravalloti et al., 2010), Amazonian Peru (Tobler et al., 2009) and Ecuador (Blake et al., 2012). At these sites this may represent a strategy to avoid resources competition with other cervids, such as Mazama americana (Erxleben, 1777) (Tobler et al., 2009).

The nocturnal pattern of C. chinga reported in this study was also observed by a telemetry study of the species in the Brazilian Pampa region (Kasper et al., 2012b). The same authors reported an activity focus between 20h00min and 03h00min, with activities beginning after sunset and ending near sunrise. The few records observed at the beginning of the day in our study may represent individuals returning to their dens, where they may remain throughout the day (Kasper et al., 2012b).

Considering that the circadian cycle of animals is regulated by periodic signals, such as the daily light-dark cycle and that the Pampa represents the southern limit of the distribution of many species, such as jaguar, tapir, margay, crab eating fox and agouti (Redford and Eisemberg, 1992), the longer nocturnal period in this region (at least during the austral winter) may affect species activity patterns. However, other factors, such as food availability and social interactions, can also affect the biological clock of some species (Mistlberger and Skene, 2004; Mistlberger and Antle, 2011). The study area is known to be under high hunting pressure (Peters et al., 2011), which may also affect the activity patterns of the sampled species (Kitchen et al., 2000; Vieira and Port, 2007; Martin and Reale, 2008; Norris et al., 2010). Consequently, the activity pattern observed for some medium and large mammals in the Pampa region may be related not just to evolutionary, biological and ecological aspects (Bitetti et al., 2009; Tobler et al., 2009; Chiaravalloti et al., 2010; Foster et al., 2013), but also to human impacts not measured here.

Cuniculus paca is considered an important game animal throughout its range (Emmons, 2016), and hunting can affect the density of local populations (Valsecchi et al., 2014). Methods for density estimation for this species have not been standardized, generating densities estimates varying from 3.5 individuals/[km.sup.2] in Peru (Emmons, 1987) to 93 individuals/[km.sup.2] (Beck-King et al., 1999) in Costa Rica. Several studies report C. paca in high abundance, such as Santos-Moreno and Perez-Irineo (2013) and Eisenberg and Thorington (1973) but it seems unrealistic compared to our study area. A possible explanation, suggested by Beck-King et al. (1999), linked high C. paca abundance to high fruit availability. Our study site is located in a temperate zone, at the limit of species distribution, were fruits are scare comparing to tropical forests. In the present study we estimated a minimal density of C. paca of 3.5 ind/[km.sup.2]. Since we used only resident individuals, this is a conservative estimate, although we assumed we have recorded all transient individuals during the survey. When recalculated using all individual recorded, density estimations varied from 7.1 to 8.2 individuals per [km.sup.2]. Based on capture/recapture analysis, local C. paca population size could range from 9.4 to 11.8 individuals depending on the time period. However, these estimations should be considered with caution, because capture and recapture rates are statistically limited. Aquino et al. (2009) showed that human hunting pressure is an important variable in determining agouti abundance. Considering that hunting commonly occurs in the Pampas' region (Peters et al., 2011), and agouti is considered an important game species (Aquino et al., 2009; Valsecchi et al., 2014; Emmons, 2016), the low density of this species recorded at the study site may indicate a response to long-term intensive hunting pressure, but more studies are needed to evaluate the impact of hunting on the maintenance of this species and other wildlife populations in the Pampa.

Most individuals were recorded in a single transect, which could be a response of habitat preference, since this site was located in the most extensive block of riparian vegetation at the study area. However, we should also consider that the transects were not sampling simultaneously and the virtual preference of a transect may also be an effect of the temporarily availability of food, since the species is primarily frugivorous (Perez, 1992). The species is also known to have a strong preference for forested areas (Perez, 1992; Bonvicino et al., 2008), and in the Pampa region, especially at the study site, forests are restricted to riparian areas. Consequently, such areas may be the major habitats for Pampas-dwelling C. paca (Leuchtenberger et al., 2016). Under such circumstances, C. paca density could be calculated in linear proportion to length of adjacent water course. In the current instance, this would represent one individual for every 1,600 m of water body.

The Pampa region is the least protected Brazilian Biome and one of the poorest known biologically (Roesch et al., 2009). Although the study area represents a small portion of the Pampa Biome, this site has a representative assemblage of the medium and large mammals expected for the region. Considering the intensity and range of economic activities threatening the biological integrity of this Biome, an increase in efforts to develop scientific studies is urgently required as is the adoption of effective conservation plans to protect this ecosystem.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.174403

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Federal Institute Farroupilha--Alegrete Campus, for their logistic support. To FAPERGS for a scholarship to L.C. (number 264/2014). Patrick Ezequiel Fagundes Camargo and Daniel Batista de Araujo provided field sampling assistance. Adrian Barnett helped with the English. Flavia Tirelli revised the draft manuscript.

References

AQUINO, R., GIL, D. and PEZO, E., 2009. Ecological aspects and hunting sustainability of paca (Cuniculus paca) in the Itaya river basin, Peruvian Amazonia. Revista Peruana de Biologia, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 67-72.

BECK-KING, H., HELVERSEN, O. and BECK-KING, R., 1999. Home range, population density, and food resources of Agouti paca (Rodentia: Agoutidae) in Costa Rica: a study using alternative methods. Biotropica, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 675-685. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00417.x.

BITETTI, M.S., BLANCO, Y.E., PEREIRA, J.A., PAVIOLO, A. and PIREZ, I.J., 2009. Time partitioning favors the coexistence of sympatric crab-eating foxes (Cerdocyon thous) and pampas foxes (Lycalopex gymnocercus). Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 479-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/08-MAMM-A-113.!.

BLAKE, J.G., MOSQUERA, D., LOISELLE, B.A., SWING, K., GUERRA, J. and ROMO, D., 2012. Temporal activity patterns of terrestrial mammals in lowland rainforest of eastern Ecuador. Ecotropica (Bonn), vol. 137, no. 18, pp. 137-146.

BONVICINO, C.R., OLIVEIRA, J.A. and D'ANDREA, P.S., 2008. Guia de roedores do brasil: com chaves para generos baseados em caracteres externos. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Pan-Americano de Febre Aftosa, Organizacao Pan-Americana da Saude, Organizacao Mundial da Saude, 120 p.

BRADY, C.A., 1979. Observation on the behavior and ecology of the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous). In: J.F. EISENBERG, ed. Vertebrate ecology in the northern neotropics. Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press, pp. 161-171.

CHIARAVALLOTI, R.M., TOMAS, W.M., CAMILO, A.R., TOMAS, M.A., SANTOS, L.G.O., MOZERLE, H.B., BOLZAN, A. and BODMER, R., 2010. Separacao de nicho entre duas especies simpatricas de veados do genero Mazama em uma paisagem complexa no Pantanal. In: Anais do Simposio sobre recursos naturais e socio-economicos do Pantanal, 10 nov. 2010, Corumba. Corumba: Embrapa Pantanal, CD Rom.

COSTA, P.C., LEITE, Y.L.R., MENDES, S.L. and DITCHFIELD, A.D., 2005. Mammal conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 672-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.15231739.2005.00666.x.

COURTENAY, O. and MAFFEI, L., 2004. Cerdocyon thous (Linnaeus, 1766). In: C. SILLERO-ZUBIRI, M. HOFFMAN and D.W. MACDONALD, eds. Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs, status survey and conservation action plan. Gland: IUCN-SSC Canid Specialist Group, pp. 32-38.

CUELLAR, E., MAFFEI, L., ARISPE, R. and NOSS, A.J., 2006. Geoffroy's cats at the northern limit of their range: activity patterns and density estimates from camera trapping in Bolivian dry forests. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 169-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650520600840001.

DIBNER, C., SCHIBLER, U. and ALBRECHT, U., 2010. The mammalian circadian timing system: organization and coordination of central and peripheral clocks. Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 517-549. PMid:20148687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-physiol-021909-135821.

DONADIO, E., MARTINO, S., AUBONE, M. and NOVARO, A.J., 2001. Activity patterns, home-range, and habitat selection of the common hog-nosed skunk, Conepatus chinga (Mammmalia, Mustelidae), in northwestern Patagonia. Mammalia, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2001.65.L49.

DONATI, G., BOLLEN, A., BORGOGNINI-TARLI, S.M. and GANZHORN, J.U., 2007. Feeding over the 24-h cycle: dietary flexibility of cathemeral collared lemurs (Eulemur collaris). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1237-1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0354-x.

EISENBERG, J.F. and REDFORD, K.H., 1999. Mammals of the Neotropics--The Central Neotropics: Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 609 p.

EISENBERG, J.F. and THORINGTON, R.W. Jr., 1973. A Preliminary Analysis of a Neotropical Mammal Fauna. Biotropica, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 150-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2989807.

EMMONS, L., 2016. Cuniculus paca. Cambridge: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

EMMONS, L.H., 1987. Comparative feeding ecology of felids in a neotropical rainforest. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 271-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00292180.

ESPINOSA, C.C., GALIANO, D., KUBIAK, B.B. and MARINHO, J.R., 2016. Medium- and large-sized mammals in a steppic savanna area of the Brazilian Pampa: survey and conservation issues of a poorly known fauna. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 73-79. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/1519-6984.12714.

FARIA-CORREA, M., BALBUENO, R.A., VIEIRA, E.M. and FREITAS, T.R.O., 2009. Activity, habitat use, density, and reproductive biology of the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) and comparison with the pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus) in a Restinga area in the southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mammalian Biology, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 220-229. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.mambio.2008.12.005.

FOSTER, R.J. and HARMSEN, B.J., 2011. A critique of density estimation from camera-trap data. The Journal of Wildlife Management, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 224-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.275.

FOSTER, V.C., SARMENTO, P., SOLLMANN, R., TORRES, N., JACOMO, A.T.A., NEGROES, N., FONSECA, C. and SILVEIRA, L., 2013. Jaguar and puma activity patterns and predator-prey interactions in four Brazilian biomes. Biotropica, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 373-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/btp.12021.

GOOGLE LLC., 2013 [viewed 22 April 2015]. Google Earth. v. 7.1.5.1557 [software]. Mountain View: Google. Alegrete, Rio Grande do Sul, 11 June 2013, 29[degrees]42'37.04"S, 55[degrees]32'18.58"W, Eye alt 4.32 km, DigitalGlobe2015. Available from: http://www. earth.google.com

GOMEZ, H., WALLACE, R.B., AYALA, G. and TEJADA, R., 2005. Dry season activity periods of some Amazonian mammals. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650520500129638.

GUDYNAS, E., 1989. The conservation status of South American rodents: many questions but few answers. In: W.Z. LIDICKER, ed. Rodents: a world survey of species of conservation concern --proceedings of a Workshop of the IUCN/ SSC Rodent Specialist Group, Held at the Fourth International Theriological Congress, 17 August 1985, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Gland: IUCN, pp. 20-25.

HASENACK, H. and CORDEIRO, J.L.P. (orgs.), 2006 [viewed 3 august 2015]. PROBIO--cobertura vegetal do bioma Pampa: relatorio tecnico [online]. Porto Alegre: Centro de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasilia: Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Ministerio do Meio Ambiente, 30 p. Available from: http://www.ecologia.ufrgs.br/labgeo/arquivos/ Publicacoes/Relatorios/2007/Relatorio_bioma_Pampa.pdf

HUCK, M., JUAREZ, C.P., ROTUNDO, M.A. and FERNANDEZ-DUQUE, E., 2013. Primera evidencia craneal y registros documentados de Cuniculus paca (Rodentia, Cuniculidae) para el chaco humedo de Argentina. Mastozoologia Neotropical, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 153-157.

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATISTICA --IBGE, 2004 [viewed 3 august 2015]. Mapas dosBiomas e de Vegetacao [online]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Available from: http://www. ibge.gov.br/home/ presidencia/noticias/21052004biomashtml.shtm

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATISTICA --IBGE, 2012 [viewed 3 august 2015]. Manual tecnico da vegetacao brasileira [online]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Available from: ftp://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/documentos/recursos_naturais/ manuais_tecnicos/ manual_tecnico_vegetacao_brasileira.pdf

KARANTH, K.U. and NICHOLS, J.D., 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2852-2862. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:EOTDII]2.0.CO;2.

KARANTH, K.U., 1995. Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture recapture models. Biological Conservation, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 333-338. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00057-W.

KASPER, C.B., BASTAZINI, V.A.G., SOARES, J.B.G. and FREITAS, T.R.O., 2012a. Abundance of Conepatus chinga (Carnivora, Mephitidae) and other medium-sized mammals in grasslands of southern Brazil. Iheringia. Serie Zoologia, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 303-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S007347212012000300009.

KASPER, C.B., SOARES, J.B.G. and FREITAS, T.R.O., 2012b. Differential patterns of home-range, net displacement and resting sites use of Conepatus chinga in southern Brazil. Mammalian Biology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 358-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/). mambio.2012.03.006.

KASPER, C.B., MAZIM, F.D., SOARES, J.B.G. and OLIVEIRA, T.G., 2015. Density estimates and conservation of Leopardus pardalis southernmost population of the Atlantic Forest. Iheringia. Serie Zoologia, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 367-371. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/1678-476620151053367371.

KITCHEN, A.M., GESE, E.M. and SCHAUSTER, E.R., 2000. Changes in coyote activity patterns due to reduced exposure to human persecution. Canadian Journal of Zoology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 853-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z00-003.

KOPPEN, W., 1948. Climatologia: con un estudio de los climas de la tierra. Mexico: Fundo de Cultura Economica, 478 p.

KOVACH, W.L., 2011. Oriana: circular statistics for windows. Pentraeth: Kovach Computing Services, 171 p.

KREBS, C.J., 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, 652 p.

LEUCHTENBERGER C., TIRELLI, F.P., MAZIM, F.D., PETERS, F.B., OLIVEIRA, E.S., CARIOLATTO, L. and QUEIROLO, D., 2016. New records of Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) in a temperate grassland dominated landscape of Pampas region of Brazil and Uruguay. Mammalia, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1-4. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2015-0129.

MARTIN, J.G.A. and REALE, D., 2008. Animal temperament and human disturbance: implications for the response of wildlife to tourism. Behavioural Processes, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 66-72. PMid:17683881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.004.

MICHALSKI, F. and NORRIS, D., 2011. Activity pattern of Cuniculus paca (Rodentia: Cuniculidae) in relation to lunar illumination and other abiotic variables in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Zoologia, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 701-708. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S1984-46702011000600002.

MISTLBERGER, R.E. and ANTLE, M.C., 2011. Entrainment of circadian clocks in mammals by arousal and food. Essays in Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 119-136. PMid:21819388. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1042/bse0490119.

MISTLBERGER, R.E. and SKENE, D.J., 2004. Social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms: animal and human studies. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 533-556. PMid:15366762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S1464793103006353.

NASCIMENTO, V.L., FERREIRA, J.A., FREITAS, D.M., SOUSA, L.L., BORGES, P.A.L. and TOMAS, W.M., 2004. Periodo de atividade de alguns vertebrados do Pantanal, estimado por fotografia remota. In: Anais do Simposio sobre recursos naturais e socio-economicos do pantanal, 23-26 Novembro 2004, Corumba. Corumba: Embrapa Pantanal, CD-Rom.

NORRIS, D., MICHALSKI, F. and PERES, C.A., 2010. Habitat patch size modulates terrestrial mammal activity patterns in Amazonian forest fragments. Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 551-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-1994.

OTIS, D.L., BURNHAM, K.P., WHITE, G.C. and ANDERSON, D.R., 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Bethesda: The Wildlife Societ, 135 p. Wildlife Monographs, no. 62.

PAGLIA, A.P., FONSECA, G.A.B., RYLANDS, A.B., HERRMANN, G., AGUIAR, L.M.S., CHIARELLO, A.G., LEITE, Y.L.R., COSTA, L.P., SICILIANO, S., KIERULFF, M.C.M., MENDES, S.L., TAVARES, V.C., MITTERMEIER, R.A. and PATTON, J.L., 2012. Lista anotada dos mamiferos do Brasil/annotated checklist of brazilian mammals. Arlington: Conservation International, 76 p. Occasional Papers in Conservation Biology, no. 6.

PATTON, J.L., 2015. Family Cuniculidae G. S. Miller and Gidley, 1918. In: J.L. PATTON, U.F.J. PARDINAS and G. D'ELIA, eds. Mammals of South America: rodents. vol. 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 726-733.

PAVIOLO, A., ANGELO, C.D., BLANCO, Y.E. and BITETTI, M.S., 2008. Jaguar Panthera onca population decline in the Upper Parana Atlantic Forest of Argentina and Brazil. Oryx, vol. 42, no. 04, pp. 554-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0030605308000641.

PEREZ, E.M., 1992. Agouti paca. Mammalian Species, no. 404, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504102.

PETERS, F.B., ROTH, P.R.O., PEREIRA, M.S., PISKE, A.D. and CHRISTOFF, A.U., 2011. Aspectos da caca e perseguicao aplicada a mastofauna na area de protecao ambiental do Ibirapuita, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Biodiversidade Pampeana, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 16-19.

PINTO, L.C. and DUARTE, M.M., 2013. Occurrence (new record) of maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus (Illiger, 1815) (Carnivora, Canidae) in southern Brazil. Ciencia Florestal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 253-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/198050988459.

REDFORD, K.H. and EISEMBERG, J.F., 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics--the southern cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay. vol. 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 460 p.

RINALDI, A.R., 2014. Ecologia de capivaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, Linnaeus, 1766) em regiao alterada pela formacao de um reservatorio hidreletrico. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Parana, 200 p. Dissertacao de Doutorado em Ecologia e Conservacao.

RODRIGUES, M.V., 2013. Comportamento de um grupo de capivaras em uma area urbanizada. Acta Veterinaria Brasilica, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 212-217.

ROESCH, L.F.W., VIEIRA, F.C.B., PEREIRA, V.A., SCHUNEMANN, A.L., TEIXEIRA, I.F., SENNA, A.J.T. and STEFENON, V.M., 2009. The Brazilian Pampa: a fragile Biome. Diversity (Basel), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 182-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d1020182.

SANTOS-MORENO, A. and PEREZ-IRINEO, G., 2013. Abundancia de tepezcuintle (Cuniculus paca) y relacion de su presencia con la de competidores y depredadores en una selva tropical. Therya, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 89-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.12933/therya-13-97.

SIDELL, B.P., 2002. Moonrise 3.5--32Bit [software]. Informer Technologies, Inc.

SILVA, F., 2014. Mamiferos silvestres do Rio Grande do Sul. 3rd ed. Porto Alegre: Fundacao Zoobotanica do Rio Grande do Sul, 308 p.

SILVER, S.C., OSTRO, L.E.T., MARSH, L.K., MAFFEI, L., NOSS, A.J., KELLY, M.J., WALLACE, R.B., GOMEZ, H. and AYALA, G., 2004. The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx, vol. 38, no. 02, pp. 148-154. http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/S0030605304000286.

SOISALO, M.K. and CAVALCANTI, S.M.C., 2006. Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture-recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry. Biological Conservation, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 487-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.biocon.2005.11.023.

TOBLER, M.W., CARRILLO-PERCASTEGUI, E.S. and POWELL, G., 2009. Habitat use, activity patterns and use of mineral licks by five species of ungulate in south-eastern Peru. Journal of Tropical Ecology, vol. 25, no. 03, pp. 261-270. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266467409005896.

TORTATO, F.R. and ALTHOFF, S.L., 2009. Avaliacao de fatores abioticos sobre o periodo de atividade do graxaim (Cerdocyon thous, Carnivora: Canidae). Biotemas, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 147-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2009v22n4p147.

VALSECCHI, J., EL BIZRI,H.R. and FIGUEIRA, J.E.C., 2014. Subsistence hunting of Cuniculus pacain the middle of the Solimoes River, Amazonas, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 560-568. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/bjb.2014.0098.

VIEIRA, E.M. and PORT, D., 2007. Niche overlap and resource partitioning between two sympatric fox species in southern Brazil. Journal of Zoology, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. 57-63. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00237.x.

WRIGHT, S.J., ZEBALLOS, H., DOMINGUEZ, I., GALLARDO, M.M., MORENO, M.C. and IBANEZ, R., 2000. Poachers alter mammal abundance, seed dispersal, and seed predation in a Neotropical forest. Conservation Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 227-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98333.x.

C. Leuchtenberger (a) *, E. S. de Oliveira (b), L. P. Cariolatto (c) and C. B. Kasper (b)

(a) Instituto Federal Farroupilha--IFFAR, Coordenacao de Ciencias Biologicas, Rua Erechim, no 860, Campus Panambi, CEP 98280-000, Panambi, RS, Brazil

(b) Universidade Federal do Pampa--UNIPAMPA, Laboratorio de Biologia de Mamiferos e Aves--LABIMAVE, Av. Antonio Trilha, no 1847, CEP 97300-000, Sao Gabriel, RS, Brazil

(c) Instituto Federal Farroupilha--IFFAR, RS-377, Km 27, Campus Alegrete, Passo Novo, CEP 97555-000, Alegrete, RS, Brazil

* e-mail: caroleucht@gmail.com

Received: January 13, 2017--Accepted: June 26, 2017--Distributed: November 30, 2018

Caption: Figure 1. Map of the study area, showing the location of camera trap stations along four transects (T1--T4) to survey medium- and large-sized mammals in a Pampa region, southern Brazil. The white areas on the map represent native grassland.

Caption: Figure 2. Circular distribution of records of medium and large mammals in a region of the southern Brazilian Pampa: A) Cuniculus paca (n = 52); B) Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris (n = 23); C) Cerdocyon thous (n = 17); D) Mazama gouazoubira (n = 10); E) Conepatus chinga (n = 10). The black bars represent the number of independent photographic records (n) per hour.
Table 1. Classification of the circadian activity pattern of
medium and large wild mammals surveyed with camera traps at
Passo Novo, Alegrete municipality, southern Brazil. Nomenclature
and taxonomic arrangement follow Paglia et al. (2012).
(N = number of independent photographic records).

Taxon                                Percentage of Records (%)
(Order and Species)              Diurnal   Crepuscular   Nocturnal

Didelphimorphia
  Didelphis albiventris                       25.0         75.0
  (Lund, 1840)
Pilosa
  Tamandua tetradactyla                                     100
  (Linnaeus, 1758)
Cingulata
  Dasypus novemcinctus                        11.1         88.9
  (Linnaeus, 1758)
Artiodactyla
  Mazama gouazoubira              50.0        10.0         40.0
  (G. Fischer [von Waldheim],
  1814)
Carnivora
  Cerdocyon thous                             35.3         64.07
  (Linnaeus, 1766)
  Conepatus chinga                10.0        10.0         80.0
  (Molina, 1782)
  Procyon cancrivorus                                       100
  (G.[Baron] Cuvier, 1798)
Lagomorpha
  Lepus europaeus                              100
  (Pallas, 1778)
Rodentia
  Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris        4.3        17.4         73.9
  (Linnaeus, 1766)
  Cuniculus paca                               9.6         90.4
  (Linnaeus, 1766)
Total

Taxon                             N     Activity
(Order and Species)                      Pattern

Didelphimorphia
  Didelphis albiventris           4
  (Lund, 1840)
Pilosa
  Tamandua tetradactyla           1
  (Linnaeus, 1758)
Cingulata
  Dasypus novemcinctus            9
  (Linnaeus, 1758)
Artiodactyla
  Mazama gouazoubira             10     Cathemeral
  (G. Fischer [von Waldheim],
  1814)
Carnivora
  Cerdocyon thous                17    Crepuscular/
  (Linnaeus, 1766)                      nocturnal
  Conepatus chinga               10     Nocturnal
  (Molina, 1782)
  Procyon cancrivorus             2
  (G.[Baron] Cuvier, 1798)
Lagomorpha
  Lepus europaeus                 1
  (Pallas, 1778)
Rodentia
  Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris      23     Nocturnal
  (Linnaeus, 1766)
  Cuniculus paca                 52     Nocturnal
  (Linnaeus, 1766)
Total                            129

Table 2. Records of ten individuals (ID) of Cuniculus paca by
camera trap surveys from July 2014 to April 2015 in a riparian
forest at the Passo Novo, Alegrete municipality, southern Brazil.
Roman numerals represent those transects in which individuals were
 recorded and the number of records are given in parenthesis.

                         2014

 ID     Jul       Aug       Sep    Oct  Nov     Dec

 1    II (02)
 2    II (01)   II (01)
 3              II (09)
 4    II (01)
 5                        II (01)
 6                                            IV (03)
 7                                            IV (01)
 8
 9
 10

                        2015

 ID     Jan       Feb       Mar    Apr  May     Jun

 1    II (02)
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6   III (02)   IV (02)            IV (01)
 7              IV (01)
 8    II (05)
 9    II (01)
 10                       I (01)
COPYRIGHT 2018 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Leuchtenberger, C.; de Oliveira, E.S.; Cariolatto, L.P.; Kasper, C.B.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:Nov 1, 2018
Words:6409
Previous Article:Susceptibility of cariogenic microorganisms to phytoconstituents/Susceptibilidade de microrganismos cariogenicos a fitoconstituintes.
Next Article:Can climate and soil conditions change the morpho-anatomy among individuals from different localities? A case study in Aldama grandiflora...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |