Achievement goals and physical self-perceptions of adolescent athletes.
Competence is at the conceptual core of the achievement goal construct. Bong (2009) stated that achievement goals are strongly predicted by perceived competence. This probably mediates the influence of achievement goals on achievement-related outcomes (Adie, Duda, & Ntoumanis, 2008; Nien & Duda, 2008; Wang, Liu, Lochbaum, & Stevenson, 2009). Athletes who adopt PAp goals should be more self-confident (Stoeber & Crombie, 2010). In addition, Jagacinski, Kumar, Boe, Lam, and Miller (2010) reported that changes in perceived competence influence changes in the strength of endorsement of achievement goals. Darnon, Muller, Schrager, Pannuzzo, and Butera (2006) indicated that performance goals significantly predicted the reported amount of self-competence. According to Elliot and Church (1997), PAv goals are primarily a function of low competence perceptions. In contrast, self-concept and self-esteem are variables that are clearly associated with achievement goals (McGregor & Elliot, 2002). Pajares, Britner, and Valiante (2000) reported that PAp goals were associated positively with self-concept and PAv goals were associated negatively with self-concept.
The relationship between achievement goals and physical self-perceptions of adolescent athletes was examined. It was hypothesized that three physical self-perceptions, that is, sports competence, global physical self-concept, and self-global esteem would be predictors of four achievement goals. It was also thought that knowledge obtained from this study regarding the characteristics of achievement goals and physical self-perceptions would make a useful contribution to motivation in sport research.
Participants comprised 208 adolescent athletes of whom 120 were female (M [+ or -] SD = 16.33 [+ or -] 0.47) and 88 male (M [+ or -] SD = 16.38 [+ or -] 0.49) with a mean of age of 16.35 [+ or -] 0.48 years. Participants, who took part in handball and volleyball competition at a regional level in Adana, Turkey, reported that their sport experience was 4.00 [+ or -] 2.41 years, and they trained for 3.59 [+ or -] 1.75 days per week.
Achievement goals. The 2 x 2 Achievement Goals Questionnaire for Sport (2 x 2 AGQ-S; Conroy, Elliot, & Hofer, 2003) that has been adapted for use in Turkish culture by Kazak Cetinkalp (2009) was used to measure athletes' achievement goals. The questionnaire has four subscales: mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance. Answers were given on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The reliability and validity for Turkish athletes were reported by Kazak Cetinkalp (2009).
Physical self-perceptions. The Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ) was developed by Marsh, Richards, Johnson, Roche, and Tremayne (1994) and has been adapted for use in the Turkish culture by Asci (2000). The questionnaire is a multidimensional instrument with 11 subscales: strength, body fat, physical activity, endurance/fitness, sports competence, coordination, health, appearance, flexibility, global physical self-concept, and global self-esteem. Sports competence, global physical self-concept, and global self-esteem subscales were used in this study to determine athletes' physical self-perceptions. The construct validity and internal reliability of the PSDQ have been successfully demonstrated within a physical activity context (Asci, 2000).
Firstly, descriptive statistics in this study were compiled. Then, the Pearson product-moment correlations and regression analysis with stepwise methods were conducted to examine the relationship between achievement goals and physical self-perceptions.
The descriptive statistics and independent t test results for each variable are displayed in Table 1. All variable scores were generally above average. In terms of gender differences, the results showed that only the MAv achievement goal was significantly different between female and male athletes (t = 2.54, p < .05). The female athletes' MAv scores were higher than male athletes'.
The relationship between adolescent athletes' achievement goals and physical self-perceptions was small to moderate as shown in Table 2. The MAp goal was significantly related to sports competence and global physical self-concept (p < .05); the MAv goal was not significantly related to physical self-perceptions (p > .05); the PAp goal was significantly correlated with sports competence, global physical self-concept, and global self-esteem (p < .01); and the PAv goal was related to sports competence (p < .05).
In Table 3 it can be seen that there were independent variables that contributed significantly to the MAp goal and predicted about 3% of the variance. Global physical self-concept was a positive predictor of the MAp goal (F(1, 206) = 5.55, p < .05). In contrast, the MAv goal was not significantly predicted by physical self-perceptions. The PAp goal was significantly predicted by sports competence (F(1, 206) = 19.30, p < .001). This explained 9% of the variance. Sports competence emerged as a unique significant positive predictor (F(1, 206) = 6.51, p < .05) for the PAv goal, accounting for 3% of the explained variance.
The purpose in the present study was to examine the relationship between achievement goals and physical self-perceptions of adolescent athletes. The results showed that female athletes have more MAv goals than male athletes. Similarly, Morris and Kavussanu (2008) found that female athletes' MAv scores were significantly higher than male athletes'. In contrast, Fouladchang, Marzooghi, and Shemshiri (2009) concluded that there was no significant difference between males and females on MAv goal orientation scores. Results gained in the present study showed that there was no significant difference between males and females in terms of MAp, PAp, and PAv goals. In contrast, Patrick, Ryan, and Pintrich (1999) found that females endorsed MAp goals significantly more than males. Pajares et al. (2000) reported that there were no gender differences in PAv goals. Middleton and Midgley (1997), who examined the relationship between goal orientation and gender for adolescent students, concluded that males demonstrated higher endorsement of PAp goals than females.
Our results indicated that MAp goals were related to sports competence and global physical self-concept. In addition, global physical self-concept was a positive predictor of MAp goals. In their studies, Conroy, Coatsworth, and Fifer (2005), and Murcia, Camacho, and Rodriguez (2008) reported that the MAp goal was positively correlated with perceived competence, and Morris and Kavussanu (2008) stated that MAp goals were positively predicted by perceived competence.
In this study, the results showed that the MAv goals were statistically unrelated to sports competence, global physical self-concept, and global self-esteem. In contrast, Baranik, Stanley, Bynum, and Lance (2010) found that MAv achievement goals were positively correlated with perceived competence. Murcia et al. (2008) indicated that perceived competence was negatively predicted by the MAv goal.
Results of this study also showed that the PAp goal was positively associated with sports competence, global physical self-concept, and global self-esteem. Furthermore, sports competence was a positive predictor of the PAp goal. These results are consistent with those gained in other studies demonstrating the relationship between the PAp goal and self-perceptions. Pajares et al. (2000) reported that the PAp goal was positively correlated with self-concept. In addition, they found that the PAp goal was a significant predictor of self-concept and self-efficacy. Murcia et al. (2008) also determined that the PAp goal was positively associated with perceived competence. Morris and Kavussanu (2008) indicated that PAp goals were positively predicted by perceived competence.
The results of this study showed that the PAv goal was related to sports competence. Pajares et al. (2000), however, found a negative relationship between performance-avoidance and self-concept and indicated that the PAv goal was a negative predictor of self-concept and self-efficacy. Cury and Da Fonseca (2001) also reported that low levels of perceived competence were more associated with the PAv goal.
In an evaluation of the findings of this study it will be evident that sports competence is an important variable in terms of achievement goal orientations in sport. Approach goals were shown to be associated with global physical self-concept. Achievement goals are conceptualized as situation-specific perceptions about competence in relation to a particular behavior. General physical self-concept, in particular, serves as a distal influence on approach goals. Approaching a situation such as a physical activity is related to the individual's thoughts about physical self. The individual is expected to participate in an achievement environment, such as a physical activity, to the extent of his or her perception of self-competence in relation to that activity. Therefore, global physical self-concept perception is associated with athletes' adoption of approach-focused goals that encourage positive outcomes or avoidance-focused goals that prohibit negative outcomes.
Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the psychological and emotional welfare of sport participants. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 302-322.
Asci, F. H. (2000). The reliability and validity of PSDQ for a Turkish population. Proceedings of the 5th Sport Sciences Congress, 3-5 November, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Baranik, L. E., Stanley, L. J., Bynum, B. H., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 23, 265-282. http://doi.org/g86
Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 879-896. http://doi.org/g87
Conroy, D. E., Coatsworth, J. D., & Fifer, A. M. (2005). Testing dynamic relations between perceived competence and fear of failure in young athletes. European Review of Applied Psychology, 55, 99-110. http://doi.org/g88
Conroy, D. E., Elliot, A. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2003). A 2 x 2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25, 456-476.
Cury, F., & Da Fonseca, D. (2001). Approche/evitement et theorie des buts d'accomplissement: Donnees empiriques et avancees conceptuelles [Approach/avoidance and achievement goal theory: Empirical data and conceptual advances]. In F. Cury & P. Sarrazin (Eds.), Theories de la motivation et pratiques sportives: Etat des recherches [Theories of motivation in sport and exercise: Research review] (pp. 121-142). Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.
Darnon, C., Muller, D., Schrager, S. M., Pannuzzo, N., & Butera, F. (2006). Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 766-776. http://doi.org/g89
dela Rosa, E. (2010). The 2 x 2 achievement goal framework and intrinsic motivation among Filipino students: A validation study. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review, 1, 48-58.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273. http://doi.org/g9b
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the "classic" and "contemporary" approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143-179). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475. http://doi.org/g9c
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. http://doi.org/g9d
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139-156. http://doi.org/g9f
Elliot, E., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. http://doi.org/g9g
Fouladchang, M., Marzooghi, R., & Shemshiri, B. (2009). The effect of gender and grade level differences on achievement goal orientations of Iranian undergraduate students. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9, 968-972. http://doi.org/bkx3nx
Jagacinski, C. M., Kumar, S., Boe, J. L., Lam, H., & Miller, S. A. (2010). Changes in achievement goals and competence perceptions across the college semester. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 191-204. http://doi.org/g9h
Kazak Cetinkalp, Z. (2009). The evaluation of self-determination theory and achievement goal theory in sport. Doctoral thesis, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey.
Marsh, H. W., Richards, G. E., Johnson, S., Roche, L., & Tremayne, P. (1994). Physical Self-Description Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of relations to existing instruments. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16, 270-305.
McGregor, H., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381-395. http://doi. org/g9j
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718. http://doi.org/g9k
Morris, R. L., & Kavussanu, M. (2008). Antecedents of approach-avoidance goals in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 465-476. http://doi.org/g9m
Murcia, J. A. M., Camacho, A. S., & Rodriguez, J. M. M. (2008). Prognostic of the perceived competence through motivation in practitioners of physical exercise. Fitness & Performance Journal, 7, 357-65. http://doi.org/g9n
Nien, C. L., & Duda, J. L. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of approach and avoidance achievement goals: A test of gender invariance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 352-372. http://doi.org/g9p
Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406-422. http://doi.org/g9q
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males' and females' self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 153-171. http://doi.org/g9r
Stoeber, J., & Crombie, R. (2010). Achievement goals and championship performance: Predicting absolute performance and qualification success. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 513-521. http://doi.org/g9s
Wang, C. K., Liu, W. C., Lochbaum, M. R., & Stevenson, S. J. (2009). Sport ability beliefs, 2 x 2 achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation: The moderating role of perceived competence in sport and exercise. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 303-312.
ZISAN KAZAK CETINKALP
Zisan Kazak Cetinkalp, School of Physical Education and Sport, Ege University.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Zisan Kazak Cetinkalp, School of Physical Education and Sport, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir 35100, Turkey. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics and Independent t Test Results for each Variable Total Female M SD M SD Mastery-approach 6.37 1.23 6.37 1.31 Mastery-avoidance 4.82 1.57 5.05 1.54 Performance-approach 5.67 1.37 5.64 1.44 Performance-avoidance 5.01 1.48 5.05 1.53 Sports competence 4.53 .89 4.48 .89 Global physical self-concept 4.84 .93 4.87 .93 Global self-esteem 3.92 .79 3.84 .78 Male t M SD Mastery-approach 6.37 1.14 -.00 Mastery-avoidance 4.49 1.57 2.54 * Performance-approach 5.71 1.28 -.34 Performance-avoidance 4.96 1.41 .44 Sports competence 4.60 .89 -.98 Global physical self-concept 4.80 .93 .55 Global self-esteem 4.02 .79 -1.64 Note: * p < .05 Table 2. Pearson Correlations Between Achievement Goals and Self-perceptions Global Sports physical Global competence self-concept self-esteem Mastery-approach .16 * .16 * .06 Mastery-avoidance .10 .12 -.05 Performance-approach .29 ** .22 ** .22 ** Performance-avoidance .18 * .14 .13 Note: * p < .05, ** p < .01. Table 3. Summaries of Regression Analyses for Athletes' Achievement Goals Scores [R.sup.2] [beta] F Mastery-approach Global physical self-concept .03 .16 5.55 * Mastery-avoidance ns (a) -- -- -- Performance-approach Sports competence .09 .29 19.30 *** Performance-avoidance Sports competence .03 .18 6.51 * Notes: * p < .05, *** p < .001, (a) ns = nonsignificant.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Cetinkalp, Zisan Kazak|
|Publication:||Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2012|
|Previous Article:||Individual differences in adult crying: the role of attachment styles.|
|Next Article:||Do Korean young children's daily routines and their mothers' parenting stress differ according to socioeconomic status?|