Printer Friendly

Accountable care movement depends on clinical analytics: health reform efforts present a new type of knowledge management challenge.

U.S. healthcare is in the very early stages of a transformation from a focus on volume to value-based purchasing. In other words, instead of getting paid for how many procedures and office visits they do, health systems are launching "accountable care organizations" (ACOs) that will get rewarded by payers for keeping groups of patients healthy, regardless of how many procedures, lab tests or visits it involves. They may also face financial risk if they fail to meet clinical quality measures.

Those recently formed ACOs present a new type of knowledge management challenge for healthcare organizations because they will require a sophisticated deployment of clinical analytics and collaboration between a larger pool of providers and across organizational boundaries in order to identify and close gaps in care.

So what is clinical analytics? By most definitions, it is a system that puts up-to-date clinical information in the hands of providers to help them improve both patient outcomes and compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

The technology roadmap for an ACO is coming into focus: Digitize the information in electronic health records, overlay actionable analytics and provide point-of-care clinical decision support, allowing caregivers to focus their valuable time on patient care and improving outcomes, says Mansoor Khan, CEO of Alere Analytics (alere.com), a company that specializes in analytics and clinical decision support technology.

Claims and clinical data

Two pools of knowledge are in play: one to standardize care for all patients, and the other to meet the advanced needs of chronically ill patients. "You need to stratify those patients who are at higher risk," Khan explains. With diabetic patients, for instance, several measures are the most important to follow, including hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol levels and regular foot exams. Using data warehouses and clinical dashboards, health systems can remind physicians to focus on those treatments during office visits. Those tools also give the organization the capability to compare how providers are performing with chronically ill patients and how they can improve.

Khan says it is now possible to combine clinical and claims data in one comprehensive view to take risk stratification to the next level. "Previously it was only done with claims data," he explains. "Now that we can create evidence-based care gap scores for patients with both clinical and claims data, the fidelity goes way up. We can benchmark who your best providers are and look at their practices, and try to roll those practices out to your whole network."

Cynthia Burghard, who tracks ACO trends for IDC Health Insights (idc-hi.com), has given several presentations on the IT tools ACOs need. She says that beyond the analytics, ACOs also need tools to manage patients across settings of care, such as patient registries and consumer engagement tools to work on medication adherence and behavioral changes with patients. "That is why you need the analytics first: to help identify people most likely to make changes and devote resources to them," she says.

In a 2012 survey of healthcare leaders about accountable care, IDC Health Insights found that the top four reported capabilities for which healthcare organizations intend to use analytics are:

* the ability to identify patients/members in need of care management,

* clinical outcomes analysis,

* performance measurement and management, and

* clinical decision-making at the point of care.

Actionable data for physicians

Brown & Toland Physicians (brownand toland.com), an independent practice association of more than 1,500 physicians in the San Francisco Bay Area, is a "pioneer ACO" and is using a cloudbased clinical analytics tool called MinedShare from Humedica (humedica.com), a company that recently became a part of OptumInsight (optumin sight.com).

"Humedica's tool is relatively easy to use, has attractive features such as graphical views and offers both pre-delivered and ad hoc reports," explains Adrian Rawlinson, M.D., director of medical informatics for Brown & Toland. After working through data governance issues, Brown & Toland will begin pushing out reports with actionable data to physicians. "We have groups of measures on clinical standards involving pneumonia vaccine, obesity, tobacco use, diabetes and hypertension measures," Rawlinson adds.

Those reports will be published and sent to physicians as an e-mail link. "Eventually we want it embedded in the electronic medical record," Rawlinson says. "A real deficiency in the current generation of EMRs is the lack of point-of-care population management tools."

Ronnie Brownsworth, M.D., CEO of the Piedmont Clinic (piedmont.org), an independent practice association with 380 employed physicians and 520 community-based physicians in the Atlanta area, recently said that the important thing about setting up a clinical analytics platform is that it allowed his organization to start tracking progressive improvement as it gradually moves toward an accountable care environment. In a recent Healthcare Informatics magazine webinar presentation, Brownsworth said, "It gave us a track record verifying that the work we do is making a difference, which helps get physicians' buy-in to move forward."

Piedmont is working with a clinically integrated IT platform with a built-in physician portal (from Recombinant by Deloitte, recomdata.com) that serves physicians using a very wide variety of electronic medical records.

In the same presentation, Mark Golberg, general manager of the Provider/Payer/ACO Market Sector for Recombinant by Deloitte, added that healthcare system leaders just starting down the ACO path need to consider what questions they want to answer in order to change care, and then think backward from there about the technology and data sources needed. "None of the predictive analytics will do what they say if you don't have the right data coming into your data warehouse and workflow applications," he said.

From push to pull

Another group using Humedica's MinedShare tool is Anceta (anceta.com), the clinical analytics subsidiary of the American Medical Group Association (AMGA, amga.org). John Cuddeback, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical informatics officer for Anceta, gave a presentation at the recent Population Health and Care Coordination Colloquium in Philadelphia. He explained that MinedShare extends the AMGA's model for shared learning based on comparative clinical analytics. Medical groups share data to identify opportunities for improvement and to recognize best practices.

Anceta's large medical groups contribute data from their electronic health record systems, and physicians receive performance reports with comparative data. MinedShare's predictive analytics helps them identify patients who may soon fall into one of the chronic disease categories.

Anceta is moving from pushing data to physicians, "which can feel like they are being judged, to a pull model, in which the physicians get curious about querying the data themselves and find it more useful than just a reporting mechanism," Cuddeback says. Medical groups can do a query to see which medications their physicians are prescribing for glycemic control in any subgroup of patients with diabetes and see comparative data for similar patients of other medical groups participating in the Anceta Collaborative Data Warehouse.

Clinical analytics in a rural setting

ACOs aren't all run by large health systems. The Cumberland Center for Health Innovation (CCHI, cchi-tn.com) was launched in July 2012 with 39 physicians in 26 rural Tennessee practices. Some serve towns of fewer than 1,000 people. The physicians use 14 different EHR systems with no clinical system integration, and no tie to any larger entity such as a hospital system. To make the ACO model work, they needed shared clinical analytics.

"We did an RFP and only one vendor, Clinigence (clinigence.com), was able to demonstrate how to extract that data from 14 different EHRs and consolidate it for reporting," says Frank Ross, CCHI's information technology leader. "We are going to push out reports to them about how they are doing with their patients on meeting federal quality measures." The cloud-based offering from Clinigence will allow the doctors to see how they compare with the other physicians on things like 90-day A1c testing for diabetic patients. Ross explains, "It will get them talking about care coordination and process improvements to meet quality standards being set by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)."

CCHI also wants to better track the patient's route through the healthcare system--from primary care to hospital to nursing home to home care--and study the patterns of care. "Then we can do some predictive modeling on where patients are likely to end up and not repeat the same patterns we have seen, and hopefully get a different result than more hospital readmissions," Ross says. "Until now, these primary care physicians have been operating in something of an information vacuum once the patient leaves their office."

David Raths is a Philadelphia-based freelance writer, e-mal draths@mac.com
COPYRIGHT 2013 Information Today, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Raths, David
Publication:KMWorld
Date:Jun 1, 2013
Words:1416
Previous Article:The changing face of ECM.
Next Article:Enterprises turn toward the cloud and reap clear benefits.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters