Printer Friendly

Absorption of nutrients by cowpea irrigated with saline water under different leaching fractions/ Absorcao de nutrientes pelo feijao caupi irrigado com agua salina sob diferentes fracoes de lixiviacao.

INTRODUCTION

Salinity is one of the main abiotic factors that contribute to the reduction of crop yield and its effect is more pronounced in arid and semiarid regions. The high concentrations of salts in the soil, besides reducing the water potential, can cause toxic effects on the plants, leading to functional disorders and injuries in the metabolism (Debouba et al., 2006; Munns & Tester, 2008).

Cavalcante et al. (2010) report that the salt stress leads to a reduction in plant development due to the nutritional imbalances caused by the excess of salts in the absorption and transport of nutrients. Farias et al. (2009) claim that salinity reduces the activity of the ions in solution and alters the processes of absorption, transport, assimilation and distribution of nutrients in the plant. Among these ions, nitrate is the most affected (Aragao et al., 2010; Meloni et al., 2004).

In arid and semiarid regions, such as in Northeast Brazil, there has been an increase in the use of water from tube wells for irrigation, which has usually increased the levels of dissolved salts. In this situation, when irrigation is not properly conducted, due to either failures in design or inadequate management, it can cause soil salinization. In order to avoid or reduce the problems generated by soil salinization, it is necessary to use, in each irrigation, an excess water depth in order to leach the salts to below the root zone of the crops.

Regarding the use of irrigation water with high contents of salts and different values of electrical conductivity, many studies have already been conducted with the cowpea crop, such as Medeiros et al. (2008), Coelho et al. (2013) and Souza et al. (2014). However, there are only a few studies involving the species and its cultivars subjected to saline water irrigation with various leaching fractions, such as Assis Junior et al. (2007).

Studies of this nature allow to define, for the irrigators and producers of this crop, the ideal leaching fraction that must be used to maintain soil salinity adequate to the crop, taking into consideration irrigation water salinity and crop sensitivity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the mineral nutrition of cowpea subjected to saline water irrigation with different leaching fractions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out from March to June 2013 in a protected environment, in the experimental area of the State University of Southeast Bahia (UESB), using 21 drainage lysimeters with width of 1.0 m, length of 1.40 m and depth of 0.80 m.

The lysimeters were filled with soil material collected in the B horizon of a haplic Yellow Latosol, predominant in the region, which was air-dried, homogenized and sieved through a 4-mm-mesh sieve.

The saline water used in the irrigations was prepared by adding NaCl and Ca[Cl.sub.2] to the freshwater obtained from a well, in amounts necessary to obtain an electrical conductivity (CEw) of 2.4 dS [m.sup.-1] and an ionic relationship, in weight, equivalent to 3Na:2Ca, which are common characteristics in Northeast Brazil. The characteristics of the waters used in the experiment are presented in Table 1.

The experiment was set in a completely randomized design, with seven treatments and three replicates. The treatments consisted of one irrigated with freshwater (without leaching) and six irrigated with saline water, added to leaching fractions of 40, 30, 20, 15, 10 and 5% of the applied irrigation depth. The leaching fractions were selected because they are used as a criterion for the design of irrigation systems and the most commonly used are those of 5 to 20%.

The planting of cowpea, variety 'BRS Guariba, widely used by the producers of the region, was performed inside and outside the lysimeters in furrows spaced by 0.50 m, with 20 seeds per linear meter. Thinning was performed 15 days after emergence, leaving 26 plants per lysimeter.

Pre-planting fertilization was applied in the furrow using NPK (4-14-08) at the dose of 20 g per linear meter, as the sources of nutrients, and taking into consideration the results of the soil analysis (Table 2) and the requirements of the crop.

At 20 and 50 days after sowing (DAS), top-dressing fertilization was performed using urea at the dose of 20 kg [ha.sup.-1] of N. The other cultivation practices, such as weeding and control of pests and diseases, were manually performed along the crop cycle.

The irrigation depths were calculated based on crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and on the leaching fraction corresponding to each treatment, using Eq. 1. Irrigations were applied with intervals of two days.

IWD = [ET.sub.c]/[1 - LF] (1)

where:

IWD--irrigation water depth, in mm;

ETc--crop evapotranspiration, in mm; and,

LF--leaching fraction, decimal.

Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) was calculated based on the daily reference evapotranspiration ([ET.sub.0]), estimated through the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith method, correcting the values by the crop coefficients (Kc) of 0.90, 1.00, 1.20 and 1.00 for the initial, vegetative, reproductive and grain filling stages, respectively.

At 30, 55 and 80 DAS, soil samples were collected in each experimental unit in the layers of 0-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm for the determination of the balance of salts in the soil profile, evaluated based on the direct measurement of the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract. The mean values of electrical conductivity of the saturated soil extract (ECse) along the entire crop cycle were 0.99, 1.63, 1.73, 2.10, 2.30, 2.67 and 3.24 dS m-1, corresponding to the treatments with water and leaching fractions of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 40%, respectively.

For the chemical analysis of the leaf tissue, recently matured leaves were collected from the apex, at the beginning of the grain filling stage. These leaves were placed in paper bags, dried in an oven at 70[degrees]C until constant weight and taken to the Laboratory of Leaf Analysis of the Soil Department of the Federal University of Vicosa.

The data were analyzed through a contrast between the saline treatments and the freshwater, at a significance level of 0.05 by the t-test.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 3 shows the mean values of the contents of nutrients in cowpea leaves as a function of leaching fractions and irrigation water quality, besides the adequate and deficient values of nutrients in cowpea tissues.

According to the results presented in Table 3, in general, the contents of macronutrients are adequate for the crop, except for Ca and K, which are below the values considered as adequate by Oliveira & Dantas (1984). Lacerda (2005) mentions that the duration of the stress and the age of the sampled leaf can produce different results and interpretations, and may be related to the differences in the rates of [K.sup.+] retranslocation between the treatments.

In addition, there was no expressive tendency of the contents of nutrients to increase or decrease due to the leaching fractions; however, in general, the content of nutrients in the leaf tissues was higher for the leaching fractions of 5 to 20%, compared with the results obtained for freshwater.

These results corroborate those obtained by Blanco et al. (2008), Neves et al. (2009) and Gurgel et al. (2010), who report that the nutritional stress in plants subjected to salt stress can be related to the excessive accumulation of certain ions and to the reduction of others due to the alterations in the availability of nutrients, competition in the process of absorption and inhibition of the transport in the plant.

The contents of micronutrients, in general, were adequate for the crop, except for Fe, which has content considered as deficient according to Oliveira & Dantas (1984). Souza et al. (2007) evidenced that the acquisition of micronutrients, such as Fe and Mn, by the plant can be affected by the composition of the saline medium, and there is a reduction in the absorption of these micronutrients due to the antagonism with the calcium ion in excess.

The saline treatments, defined by the leaching fractions, did not affect significantly the contents of macronutrients and Na in the leaf tissue, and the opposite behavior occurred with the micronutrients (Table 4).

Regarding the macronutrients, the observed results corroborate those of Garcia et al. (2012), who studied the effects of saline water on the nutrition of conilon coffee and observed that the leaf contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and S did not show significant effects with the increase in irrigation water electrical conductivity; only Na content increased with water salinity.

Among the macronutrients in the leaves, only N decreased with the application of saline water, compared with freshwater, corroborating the results obtained by Viegas et al. (2004) in a study with cashew cultivated in NaCl nutrient solution. According to Gheyi et al. (1997), the reduction in leaf N content can be related to the inhibition of the nitrification process, which becomes absolute at ESP > 7.0, a value confirmed in Table 1.

The consequences caused by NaCl on the reduction of nitrate absorption can be related to the ionic and/or osmotic effect of [Cl.sup.-] by the absorption sites and not to the effect of the environment (Silva et al., 2009) and also by the antagonistic relationship existing between nitrate and chloride or the reduction of evapotranspiration (Oliveira et al., 2011).

Leaf P content was not affected by the application of leaching fractions or soil salinity, in comparison to freshwater, corroborating the results obtained by Neves et al. (2009) and contrary to those obtained by Bosco et al. (2009), who reported linear increment for the P content in the leaf tissue of eggplant as a function of the salinity.

The observed results can be associated with the low activity of [H.sub.2]P[O.sub.4.sup.-] in the soil solution, due to the increase in NaCl content (Al-Karaki, 1997). In addition, some experimental results show that the P contents in plants cultivated in saline environments vary along crop growth and development (Neves et al., 2009).

The K content in the leaf tissues was not affected by the application of leaching fractions, but showed an increase, although not significant, as a function of these fractions (Table 4). In spite of that, its content in the leaf tissue is close to the value considered as deficient for the crop (Table 3).

The low content in the leaf tissue can be associated, according to Fernandes et al. (2002), to its accumulation in the roots and not in the leaves, since K is an expressive inorganic solute in the plant and its main contribution is to reduce the osmotic potential of root cells. Furthermore, the increase in K content in the leaf tissue indicates, according to Calvet et al. (2013), that water salinity did not damage K dynamics from the roots to the other organs.

The contents of Ca and Mg in the leaves increased with the application of leaching fractions (Table 3) and the highest values of these nutrients were observed for leaching fractions higher than 10%, although there was no significant difference between the saline treatments and freshwater (Table 4), corroborating with Assis Junior et al. (2007).

In the case of Ca, the increase can be associated with the increment in the availability of this nutrient in the soil (Table 1), since it was present in the water of the saline treatments. Similar results were found by Souza et al. (2007), who evaluated the effects of salinity and chemical composition of the irrigation water on the vegetative growth and mineral nutrition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.), cv. Pitiuba.

The increase in Mg content in the leaf tissues can be related to its increase in the soil, due to the application of saline water, as can be observed in Table 1. Lucena et al. (2011) report that, despite the importance of this nutrient in plant metabolism, the literature referring to studies on its contents in plants cultivated under salt stress is very limited, for both watermelon and other species.

Results different from those obtained in the present study were reported by Freire et al. (2010), in which the increase in NaCl doses from 0 to 62 mmol [L.sup.-1] caused a reduction in Mg contents in the shoots of leucaena, indicating that its transport to the aerial organs was compromised.

The application of leaching fractions (saline treatments), compared with freshwater, did not affect significantly the Na content in the leaf tissue, despite the increase in its concentration in the soil, due to the leaching fractions (Table 1). Alves et al. (2011), evaluating the effect of the addition of Ca on the absorption and transport of Na and K in cashew plantlets, observed that the presence of Ca in the medium containing NaCl increased Na absorption and accumulation in the various organs. Contrary results were found by Souza et al. (2007), who studied the effect of salinity on cowpea plants and observed a significant increase in the contents of Na and Cl in the stem; however, in the leaves, the salinity influenced only the contents of chloride.

Santos et al. (2009), studying the response of the bean crop to salinity, observed that the Na content decreases in the order of stem > roots > petioles > leaves, indicating the capacity of the plants to decrease the content of this element in the photosynthetically active organ, which is a positive factor in the definition of the tolerance to saline stress.

The increase in soil salinity resulting from the application of leaching fractions caused a significant reduction in Fe and Mn contents and a significant increase in Zn and B contents in the leaf tissues of cowpea (Table 4). In the case of Fe and Mn, the results corroborate those found by Souza et al. (2007), who claim that the acquisition of micronutrients, such as Fe and Mn, by the plant can be affected by the composition of the saline medium, and there is absorption of these micronutrients due to the antagonism with the calcium ion in excess.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The mean results of the saline treatments, in comparison to freshwater, did not affect significantly the contents of micronutrients or Na in cowpea leaves, while the opposite occurred for the micronutrients.

2. The contents of nutrients in the leaf tissues were, in general, higher for the leaching fractions of up to 20%, compared with the results obtained for the freshwater.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v20n12p1067-1071

Ref. 012-2016--Received 1 Feb, 2016 * Accepted 5 Oct, 2016 * Published 31 Oct, 2016

ACKNOLEDGMENTS

To the Brazilian Northeast Bank, for the financial support; to the Research Support Foundation of the State of Bahia (FAPESB), the University of Southeast Bahia (UESB) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), for the scientific initiation scholarship.

LITERATURE CITED

Al-Karaki, G. N. Barley response to salt stress at varied levels of phosphorus. Journal of Plant Nutrition, v.20, p.1635-1643, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904169709365362

Alves, F. A. L.; Silva, S. L. F.; Silveira, J. A. G.; Pereira, V. L. A. Efeito do [Ca.sup.2+] externo no conteudo de [Na.sup.+] e [K.sup.+] em cajueiros expostos a salinidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Agrarias, v.6, p.602-608, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v6i4a1257

Aragao, R. M.; Silveira, J. A. G.; Silva, E. N.; Lobo, A. K. M.; Dutra, A. T B. Absorcao, fluxo no xilema e assimilacao do nitrato em feijao-caupi submetido a salinidade. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v.41, p.100-106, 2010.

Assis Junior, J. O.; Lacerda, C. F. de; Silva, F. B. da; Silva, F. L. B. da; Bezerra, M. A.; Gheyi, H. R. Produtividade do feijao-de-corda e acumulo de sais no solo em funcao da fracao de lixiviacao e da salinidade da agua de irrigacao. Revista de Engenharia Agricola, v.27, p.702-713, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S010069162007000400013

Blanco, F. F.; Folegatti, M. V.; Henriques Neto, D. Doses de N e K no tomateiro sob estresse salino: I. Concentracao de nutrientes no solo e na planta. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.12, p.26-33, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S141543662008000100004

Bosco, M. R. O.; Oliveira, A. B.; Hernandez, F. F. F; Lacerda, C. F. de. Influencia do estresse salino na composicao mineral da berinjela. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v.40, p.157-164, 2009.

Calvet, A. S. F.; Pinto, C. de M.; Lima, R. E. M.; Maia-Joca, R. P. M.; Bezerra, M. A. Crescimento e acumulacao de solutos em feijao-de-corda irrigada com agua de salinidade crescente em diferentes fases de desenvolvimento. Revista Irriga, v.18, p.148-159, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2013v18n1p148

Cavalcante, L. F.; Vieira, M. S.; Santos, A. F.; Oliveira, W M.; Nascimento, J. A. M. Agua salina e esterco bovino liquido na formacao de mudas de goiabeira cultivar Paluma. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, v.32, p.251-261, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452010005000037

Coelho, J. B. M.; Barros, M. de F. C.; Bezerra Neto, E.; Correa, M. M. Comportamento hidrico e crescimento do feijao vigna cultivado em solos salinizados. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.17, p.379-385, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000400004

Debouba, M.; Gouia, H.; Suzuki, A.; Ghorbel, M. H. NaCl stress effects on enzymes involved in nitrogen assimilation pathway in tomato Lycopersicon esculentum seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology, v.163, p.1247-1258, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.09.012

Farias, S. G. G. de; Santos, D. R. dos; Freire, A. L. de O.; Silva, R. B. Estresse salino no crescimento inicial e nutricao mineral de Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Kunt ex Steud) em solucao nutritiva. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo, v.33, p.1499-1505, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000500040

Fernandes, A. R.; Carvalho, J. G. de; Curi, N.; Pinto, J. E. B. P.; Guimaraes, P de T. G. Nutricao mineral de mudas de pupunheira sob diferentes niveis de salinidade. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v.37, p.1613-1619, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002001100013

Freire, A. L. de O.; Rodrigues, T. de J. D.; Miranda, J. R. P de. Crescimento e nutricao de plantas de leucena (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) R. de Vit) sob salinidade. Revista Caatinga, v.23, p.1-6, 2010.

Garcia, G. de O.; Nazario, A. A. do; Goncalves, I. Z.; Madalao, J. C.; Amaral, J. A. T. do. Nutricao do cafeeiro conilon irrigado com agua salina. Revista Irriga, v.17, p.16-27, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2012v17n1p16

Gheyi, H. R.; Queiroz, J. E.; Medeiros, J. F. de. Manejo e controle da salinidade na agricultura irrigada. Campina Grande: UFPB, 1997. 383p.

Gurgel, M. T.; Uyeda, C. A.; Gheyi, H. R.; Oliveira, F. H. T. de; Fernandes, P. D.; Silva, F. V. da. Crescimento de meloeiro sob estresse salino e doses de potassio. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.14, p.3-10, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662010000100001

Lacerda, C. F. Interacao salinidade x nutricao mineral. In: Nogueira, R. J. C.; Araujo, E. L.; Willadino, L. G.; Cavalcante, U. (ed.) Estresses ambientais: Danos e beneficios as plantas. Recife: UFRPE, 2005. p.127-137.

Lucena, R. R. M. de; Negreiros, M. Z. de; Medeiros, J. F. de; Grangeiro, L. C.; Marrocos, S. de T. P Crescimento e acumulo de macronutrientes em melancia 'quetzale' cultivada sob diferentes niveis de salinidade da agua de irrigacao. Revista Caatinga, v.24, p.34-42, 2011.

Medeiros, R.; Santos, V; Araujo, A.; Oliveira Filho, C. Estresse salino sobre a nodulacao em feijao-caupi. Revista Caatinga, v.21, p.202-206, 2008.

Meloni, D. A.; Gulotta, M. R.; Martinez, C. A.; Oliva, M. A. The effects of salt stress on growth, nitrate reduction and proline and glycinebetaine accumulation in Prosopis alba. Brazilian Journal Plant Physiology, v.16, p.39-46, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202004000100006

Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, v.59, p.651-681, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911

Neves, A. L. R.; Lacerda, C. F de; Guimaraes, F. V A.; Gomes Filho, E.; Feitosa, D. R. C. Trocas gasosas e teores de minerais no feijaode-corda irrigado com agua salina em diferentes estadios. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.13, p.873-881, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662009000700009

Oliveira, A. F.; Campos, M. de S.; Oliveira, F. R. A. de; Oliveira, M. K. T. de; Medeiros, J. F. de; Melo, T. K. de. Desenvolvimento e concentracao de nitrogenio, fosforo e potassio no tecido foliar da berinjela em funcao da salinidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Agrarias, v.6, p.37-45, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v6i1a807

Oliveira, I. P; Dantas, J. P Sintomas de deficiencias nutricionais e recomendacoes de adubacao para o caupi. Goiania: Embrapa CNPAF, 1984. 23p. Documentos 8

Santos, P R. dos; Ruiz, H. A.; Neves, J. C. L.; Freire, M. B. G. dos S.; Freire, F. J. Acumulo de cations em dois cultivares de feijoeiro crescidos em solucoes salinas. Revista Ceres, v.56, p.666-678, 2009.

Silva, E. N.; Silveira, J. A. G.; Fernandes, C. R. R.; Dutra, A. T. B.; Aragao, R. M. de. Acumulo de ions e crescimento de pinhao manso sob diferentes niveis de salinidade. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v.40, p.240-246, 2009.

Souza, G. G. de; Viana, T. V. de A.; Lacerda, C. F. de; Azevedo, B. M. de; Silva, G. L. da; Costa, F. R. B. Estresse salino em plantas de feijao-caupi em solo com fertilizantes organicos. Revista Agro@mbiente, v.8, p.359-367, 2014.

Souza, R.; Lacerda, C. F. de; Amaro Filho, J.; Hernandez, F. F. F. Crescimento e nutricao mineral do feijao-de-corda em funcao da salinidade e da composicao ionica da agua de irrigacao. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Agrarias, v.2, p.75-82, 2007.

Viegas, R. A.; Silveira, J A. G. da; Silva, L. M. de M.; Viegas, P R. A.; Queiroz, J. E.; Rocha, I. M. A. Reducao assimilatoria de N[O.sub.3.sup.-] em plantas de cajueiro cultivado em meio salinizado. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, v.8, p.189-195, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662004000200005

Cristiano Tagliaferre (1), Diogo U. G. Guimaraes (2), Lorena J. Goncalves (3), Carlos H. F. Amorim (1), Willian V. Campos (3) & Felizardo A. Rocha (4)

(1) Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia/Departamento de Engenharia Agricola e de Solos. Vitoria da Conquista, BA. E-mail: tagliaferre@yahoo.com.br (Corresponding author); chfamorim@gmail.com

(2) Empresa Modulo Rural. Vitoria da Conquista, BA. E-mail: diogoulisses1@hotmail.com

(3) Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. Vitoria da Conquista, BA. E-mail: lorenagoncalves.agro@gmail.com; willianvianac@hotmail.com

(4) Instituto Federal da Bahia/Campus Avancado de Vitoria da Conquista. Vitoria da Conquista, BA. E-mail: felizardoar@hotmail.com
Table 1. Characteristics of the waters used in the irrigation of
cowpea

Characteristics                               Freshwater
                                                 (FW)

Potential of hydrogen (pH)                       6.00
Electrical conductivity (dS [m.sup.-1])          0.20
Sodium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])                 1.30
Calcium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])                0.10
Magnesium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])              0.10
Potassium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])              0.02
SAR                                              4.10
Water classification for irrigation       [C.sub.1][S.sub.1]

Characteristics                              Saline water
                                                 (SW)

Potential of hydrogen (pH)                       5.70
Electrical conductivity (dS [m.sup.-1])          2.40
Sodium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])                16.50
Calcium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])                6.40
Magnesium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])              0.30
Potassium ([mmol.sub.c] [L.sup.-1])              0.01
SAR                                              9.00
Water classification for irrigation       [C.sub.4][S.sub.1]

Table 2. Chemical characteristics of the soil before planting and
after harvesting the cowpea crop

Period       pH             P          [K.sup.+]   [Ca.sup.++]
         [H.sub.2]O   mg [dm.sup.-3]
                                       [cmol.sub.c] [dm.sup.-3]

Before      5.8            156           0.72          2.6
After       5.1            50.2          0.32          3.2

Period   [Mg.sup.++]   [AI.sup.+++]   [H.sup.+]   [Na.sup.+]

                        [cmol.sub.c] [dm.sup.-3]

Before       1.0            0            1.8         0.22
After        1.3           0.2           2.1         0.44

Period   SB     t     T    V     m    ESP      OM g
                                 %          [dm.sup.-3]

                   [cmol.sub.c] [dm.sup.-3]

Before   4.8   4.8   6.6   73    0     3        18
After    3.3   3.4   5.5   59   4.8   7.8       --

Table 3. Mean values of contents of nutrients in cowpea leaves as
a function of leaching fractions and irrigation water quality

LF       ECse         N      P      K    Ca    Mg     S
%    dS [m.sup.-1]
                                  dag [kg.sup.-1]

FW        0.2        2.4    0.10   1.2   2.2   0.3   0.08
5         3.2        2.7    0.15   1.3   2.5   0.6   0.11
10        2.7        2.3    0.14   1.5   2.6   1.0   0.13
15        2.3        2.0    0.14   1.2   2.8   0.7   0.07
20        2.1        2.3    0.14   1.5   3.0   0.7   0.07
30        1.7        1.5    0.12   1.1   2.1   0.8   0.06
40        1.6        1.4    0.13   1.4   2.6   0.9   0.10
Adequate *           1.97   0.14   3.2   5.4   0.7   0.15
Deficient *          1.28   0.02   0.6   1.8   0.1   0.05

LF       ECse        Cu     Fe    Zn   Mn    B           Na
%    dS [m.sup.-1]                                 dag [kg.sup.-1]
                                mg [kg.sup.-1]

FW        0.2        7.0    127   37   420   44         0.002
5         3.2        10.8   125   65   293   64         0.002
10        2.7        23.1   141   54   499   104        0.002
15        2.3        13.2   107   87   385   65         0.002
20        2.1        10.0   100   55   307   65         0.002
30        1.7        10.3   80    85   406   75         0.002
40        1.6        6.8    84    43   386   58         0.002
Adequate *            6     817   43   418   202         --
Deficient *           5     337   24   24    44          --

* Adapted from Oliveira & Dantas (1984); FW--Fresh water without
leaching

Table 4. Contrasts between mean contents of nutrients in
leaves of cowpea cultivated in lysimeters irrigated with
saline water with different leaching fractions (SW) versus
freshwater (FW)

Characteristic        Unit         Difference (SW-FW)   Significance

N                dag [kg.sup.-1]         -0.16               ns
P                dag [kg.sup.-1]          0.05               ns
K                dag [kg.sup.-1]          0.23               ns
Ca               dag [kg.sup.-1]          1.10               ns
Mg               dag [kg.sup.-1]          0.56               ns
S                dag [kg.sup.-1]          0.02               ns
Na               dag [kg.sup.-1]         0.0003              ns
Cu               mg [kg.sup.-1]           5.35               *
Fe               mg [kg.sup.-1]          -21.27              *
Zn               mg [kg.sup.-1]          44.74               *
Mn               mg [kg.sup.-1]          -40.31              *
B                mg [kg.sup.-1]          28.18               *

* Significant at 0.05 probability level by t-test; ns--Not
significant
COPYRIGHT 2016 ATECEL--Associacao Tecnico Cientifica Ernesto Luiz de Oliveira Junior
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:texto en ingles
Author:Tagliaferre, Cristiano; Guimaraes, Diogo U.G.; Goncalves, Lorena J.; Amorim, Carlos H.F.; Campos, Wi
Publication:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental
Date:Dec 1, 2016
Words:4489
Previous Article:Biostimulants on mineral nutrition and fiber quality of cotton crop/Bioestimulantes na nutricao mineral e qualidade de fibra na cultura do algodao.
Next Article:Tolerance of guava rootstocks under salt stress/Tolerancia de porta-enxertos de goiabeira ao estresse salino.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |