Printer Friendly

Absorcion de agua y optimizacion de metodos para medir la conductividad electrica en semillas de acacia mangium (Fabaceae).

Water absorption and method improvement concerning electrical conductivity testing of Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) seeds

In the latest decades, the forest-covered area of the terrestrial globe has been devastated in consequence of the irrational logging (Rodrigues, Kohl, Pedrinho, Arias, & Favero, 2008). According to Ibama (2015), it is estimated that 15% of the Amazon rainforest has already been deforested. According to Rosa, Martins and Silva (2006), this situation, in simplistic reasoning, shows the need of forest production with fast-growing species, since the deficit in annual balance occurs between reposition and wood consumption.

The genus Acacia can be an alternative, since it comprehends about 1200 species, most of them being fast-growing pioneers, adaptable to most varied types of soils and occurring naturally on several continents (Rodrigues et al., 2008). Dormancy causes unevenness among the nursery-produced seedlings, and longer time of exposition to adverse conditions, like the action of pests and deterioration. Although exotic, Acacia can recover degraded ecosystems, especially those with stony ground areas and with shallow soils or formed by sand dunes (Balieiro, Dias, Franco, Campello, & Faria, 2004).

In the state of Roraima, Brazil, Acacia mangium Willd. (Fabaceae) is the forest species with largest planted area, occupying around 30 000 ha on savannah areas. However, in Amazon rainforest, commercial forest plantings are still few, due mainly to reduce scientific knowledge about the performance of native forest and exotic species in the region, in addition to the poor availability of good quality seeds (Souza, Rossi, Azevedo, & Lima, 2004).

In forestry practice, it is desirable to obtain homogeneity, both in size and time in the production of seedlings of forest species, especially those presenting seeds with a high degree of dormancy, a shared characteristic among many forest species. Forest research concerning methodologies in seed analyses are highly important for seed technology, as they provide information related to the physiological quality of the lot aiming the preservation and utilization of seedlings for different purposes (Alves, Bruno, Oliveira, Alves, & Paula, 2005; Cherobini, Muniz, & Blume, 2008).

In spite of the intensity of research related to seed size and its influence over the physiological quality in several species, information among forest species is not frequent. Seed classification by size or by weight for the determination of seed quality, using germination and vigor tests, is utilized to find the ideal class, and then, to produce several plant species (Torres, 1994). Due to difficulties found concerning germination among forest species, alternative tests, like water imbibition curve and electrical conductivity tests under controlled conditions are being applied in many laboratories with the objective of defining seed vigor and viability. The fastness in obtaining reliable results is one of the main aspects considered in the evaluation of seed quality, for it allows agility in decision making, enables its use in wider scales, decreasing the risks and costs in operations like harvest, processing, storage and commercialization (Barbieri, Menezes, Conceicao, & Tunes, 2012; Hilst, Dias, Alvarenga, & Souza, 2012; Matos, Borges, & Silva, 2015).

In the electrical conductivity test, which allows vigor comparisons between different samples of seeds, the values obtained are due to the disorganization of cell membrane and the decrease of the respiratory and biosynthetic capacity (Coutinho, Silva-Mann, Vieira, Machado, & Machado, 2007). Due to those two processes, electrolytes are released in imbibition water, the intensity of the electric current of those electrolytes being measured even by total or individual method (Vieira & Krzyzanowski, 1999).

The results of the conductivity tests can be affected by water quality, amount of tested seeds, temperature, imbibition time and degree of moisture (Bewley, Bradford, Hilhorst, & Nonogaki, 2013). Nevertheless, some authors have pointed out the importance of the development/or adjustment of these fast tests for the different forest species, since the efficiency of procedures in the evaluation of physiological potential will depend on them (Lopes, Silva, & Vieira, 2013; Araldi & Coelho, 2015). This way, the objective of this research was to evaluate the potential use of the best water absorption pattern, container size and the need of breaking the tegument dormancy, for the application of the electrical conductivity test in small and large seeds of Acacia mangium, coming from commercial plantings of different ages, established in low yielding capacity soils on savannah areas of Roraima.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The seeds were collected in January of 2011 from trees localized in Serra da Lua region (2[degrees] 33' 36" N - 60[degrees]19' 12" W) in the municipality of Bonfim, in different plots planted in 2001, 2003 and 2005 (plants 10, 8, and 6 years old when the seeds were collected, respectively). The seeds of each planting year were classified with square 1.8 mm width holes, into small and large seeds, making up, thus, 6 lots (3 lots of large seeds and 3 lots of small seeds), each of them having its mass of 1 000 seeds determined according to Brasil (2009).

Water content in seeds was determined by utilizing two replications of 1 [+ or -] 0.003 g of seeds, previously weighted and oven-dried at 105 [+ or -] 3[degrees]C for 24 hours as to obtain seed dry mass. Calculation of moisture degree was based on fresh mass of seeds (Brasil, 2009). Obtained average water content of 6.4% was utilized to convert the 1 000-seed mass to 11% of moisture. Germination test was carried out with four 50-seed replications in plastic boxes (gerbox[R]) on seed germination paper (germitest[R]) moistened with distilled water 2.5 times the paper weight and maintained in germination chambers at 25 [+ or -] 2[degrees]C (ELETROlab, mod 006M) under constant light of 0.42 Klux and humidity of 78%. The test consisted of treatments without and with seed dormancy break, which was obtained through seed immersion for 60 seconds in water heated at 100[degrees]C (Smiderle, Mourao Junior, & Sousa 2005).

Germination test was performed by daily counting to the fourteenth day, considering the number of seeds that emitted a radicle longer than 2 mm (Labouriau, 1983). With data obtained in the germination test the average germination time was calculated--Tm (Edmond & Drapala, 1965) as well as the germination velocity index--VG.

Imbibition of the seeds was carried out with four replications of 50 seeds for each lot, firstly being weighted and submitted to the dormancy break, according to Smiderle, Mourao Junior, and Sousa (2005), and afterwards, arranged between germitest[R] paper sheets moistened with distilled water (2.5 times the paper weight) and placed into gerbox[R] boxes, maintained in BOD chamber at the constant temperature of 25[degrees]C.

Imbibition process was conducted with periodic weighting (0, 2, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 and 120 hours), until at least a seed of each replicate emitted a radicle. After the last weighing, the moisture degree of seeds was determined (Brasil, 2009). For each weighing the imbibition percentage of the seeds (% E) was measured by utilizing the formula:

% E = (Mf - Mi)/Mi x 100

Where: Mf = mass after imbibition; and Mi= initial mass of the seed. Data obtained from imbibition test were submitted to regression analysis at 5% of probability in a completely randomized design in a 6x14 factorial scheme (six lots of seeds and 14 periods of weighing).

Leaching pattern of the exudates was obtained for seeds of all six lots, without and with dormancy break (Smiderle et al., 2005), using four replications of 50 seeds previously weighted on an analytical balance with precision of 0.001 g. The electrical conductivity test consisted of three experiments. In experiment I, 75 mL of distilled water were utilized in plastic cups (8 cm high, 7 cm in upper diameter and 4 cm in base diameter) with a capacity of 180 mL. In experiment II, 40 mL of distilled water in plastic cups with a capacity of 180 mL were utilized, and in Experiment III, 40 mL of distilled water in plastic cups (4 cm height, 4.5 cm in upper diameter and 3.5 cm in base diameter) with a capacity of 50 mL were utilized. The plastic containers containing distilled water were maintained in germination chamber-BOD at 25[degrees]C for 24 hours. After the period, the imbibition solution was stirred gently and the conductivity reading was carried out on bench conductivity meter and the results being divided by the respective initial mass of the seed and by the mass after 24 hours of immersion in the solution. The values were expressed in [micro]S/cm/g of seed.

Considering the three experiments, the electrical conductivity test was conducted in a completely randomized design in a 3x2x2 factorial scheme (3 years of planting; 2 seed sizes, with and without overcoming of tegument dormancy). The values obtained from electrolyte leaching were analyzed with statistical software Sisvar (Ferreira, 2011) and the means compared by Tukey test at 5% of probability.

RESULTS

The average results concerning 1 000 seed mass obtained for the six lots are shown in table 1, where the average mass of small seeds was 7.54 g, for large seeds 9.37 g, while the lot of seeds coming from trees six years old presented less mass (7.96 g).

The average values of germination percentage for seeds without dormancy break were up to 6%, due to a great part of the seeds not having imbibed water, as can be observed in the average values of percentage of remaining hard seeds up to 14 days after sowing (Table 1). For seeds subjected to dormancy break, there were no hard seeds and the average percentage of germination of the six lots ranged from 72% to 93% (Table 1).

There was no statistical significance in the interaction year and size for the seeds that had undergone the scarification process. In table 1 higher means of germination percentage and germination speed index were observed for the seeds coming from trees 10 and 8 years old and lower for those coming from six year old trees. The opposite was found for the average time of germination values, where lower values were obtained for seeds from trees 8 and 10 years old and greater for the ones obtained from six years old trees. Concerning seed size, those classified as small germinated more, in less time and presented higher germination speed index (Table 1) in relation to the large seeds, by the Tukey test (P <0.05).

Water absorption curves obtained from large and small seeds of A. mangium are observed in figure 1, where for each year, small seeds tended to result into higher immersion percent in relation to large seeds until 120 hours. Radicle emission was observed since 72 h and considering the 120-hour period, all the replications presented at least one germinated seed when the experiment was ended. However, the change between phases of the imbibition process was not visible due to, possibly, the lack of uniformity in seed imbibition and may be due to different maturation stages. The subtle presence of phase II in the range between 60 and 100 hours was then observed (Fig. 2).

Means of seed electrical conductivity in the six lots after 24 hours of immersion concerning three experiments without dormancy break and the means for the seeds with dormancy break are presented in table 2.

Comparing electrical conductivity values of the lots of same year (Table 2), for each experiment, it was found that the lowest values were obtained for the seeds classified as small relative to large seeds. However, in experiment III, this difference was not observed and average electrical conductivity was lower for large seeds when dormancy break was not held. However, with dormancy break of small seeds, in all three experiments they presented higher values of electrical conductivity (EC), except for seeds of trees 10 years old in experiment I. This also occurred with the final moisture content of the seeds.

The seeds which were given no treatment to break dormancy, presented electrical conductivity values inferior to 59 [micro]S/cm/g of seed, due to the low percent of seeds which imbibed water when there was no dormancy break (Table 2). Thus, in table 2 the values of the electrical conductivity of A. mangium seeds with tegument dormancy break were up to 287.48 [micro]S/cm/g of seed.

Due to the fact that seeds present tegument dormancy, the increase in mass was 6% after immersion in water for 24 hours for the seeds whose dormancy was not broken (Table 2). However, the seeds which were given dormancy break treatment showed an average increase of 123% (Table 2). This increase in the seed mass was due to water imbibition during the immersion period, which resulted in reduced quantity of free water in plastic cups. Analizing planting ages, it was found that there was no influence of tree age on average values of electrical conductivity of A. mangium seeds.

Comparing all three experiments in which seeds were submitted to dormancy break (Table 2), it was found that with 53% reduction of water volume, from experiment I (75 mL) to experiment II (40 mL), there was an increase in electrical conductivity value of 77% and by reducing the container size (experiment III), utilizing 40 mL of distilled water, the conductivity value kept a close relation as in experiment II. However, the electrical conductivity values obtained in experiment III do not follow the same pattern of the results obtained in the germination test (Table 1), observing this way the influence of container size on the results of electrical conductivity.

The average increases of wet mass verified in the experiments were 106.1% in seeds without dormancy break and 220.4% in seeds with dormancy break, reflecting on an average of 207%. Considering this mass for the EC calculation resulted, respectively, into 6.1% and 54.8% of reduction of EC values with and without dormancy break.

DISCUSSION

Germination percentages with similar ranges as those obtained in this work, were also reported by Smiderle, Mourao Junior and Sousa (2005) with pre-germination treatments of Acacia seeds: no dormancy break seeds showed 3% germination, and dormancy break seeds with values greater than 80% germination.

Seeds classified as small presented a tendency of imbibing more than the large ones, indicating that larger seeds are slower to absorb water relative to smaller ones. The need and importance of standardizing the seeds by size in the formation of lots to obtain more adjusted results in tests that determine the physiological quality and, especially, vigor in seeds of A. mangium, become evidenced. Oliveira and Bosco (2013) found that vigor in Copernicia hospita Mart. (Arecaceae) seeds, measured by the average emergency time was directly proportional to the size, being smaller in smaller seeds. Pagliarini, Nasser, Nasser, Cavichioli and Castilho (2014) found that seeds classified as medium or large are best for production of courbaril seedlings (Hymenaea courbaril L., Fabaceae).

Duarte, Carneiro, Silva and Guimaraes (2010), working with seeds of Dyckia goehringii Gross & Rauh (Bromeliaceae), while characterizing the imbibition curve at different temperatures, also verified the absence of the three-phase pattern in the imbibition of these seeds till 138 hours. The same authors also observed that small seeds of this species tended to absorb more water than large seeds. The non-identification of the three-phase pattern was also verified by Neves, Brandao Junior, Silva, Brandao and Sales (2010) among seeds of Joannesia princeps Vell. (Euphorbiaceae) which seed coat acted negatively on water absorption. The biochemical and physiological mechanisms of the germination process metabolism begun with germination extending into the primary root emission and varies according to the level of seed hydration. It shows, thus, the importance of monitoring the absorption of water by the seed. Comparing the three experiments without dormancy break, it was observed that with the 53% reduction of the volume of distilled water from experiment I to experiment II, there was a 45% increase of electrical conductivity value. However, keeping the volume of water in 40 mL and changing the container size (Experiment II to experiment III), increase was also observed in electrical conductivity of 57% in relation to experiment I.

Comparing the electrical conductivity values obtained from seeds coming from trees of the same planting year, for each experiment, it can be seen that small seeds showed higher electrical conductivity than the seeds classified as large. Malta, Pereira and Chagas (2005), in work conducted with Coffea arabica L. (Rubiaceae), also found that small seeds presented greater values of electrical conductivity. This occurs because small seeds have larger specific area than large seeds, allowing greater release of electrolytes in 24 hours due to more rapid imbibition as viewed in this work.

The electrical conductivity value depends on the seed mass and on the amount of water in the container. Determination of electrical conductivity in [micro]S/cm/g of seed utilizing the initial mass of the seeds, resulted into electrical conductivity values far from the results found in the germination test. However using the final mass of seeds obtained after 24 hours of immersion in water, better adjustments to data obtained in the germination test were attained making the adoption possible concerning A. mangium seeds.

Observing germination percentage and germination speed of seeds with dormancy break, it can be noted that lots with greatest vigor also presented the highest electrical conductivity values, possibly due to greatest water absorption speed or smallest seed mass utilized. This aspect was also verified by Oliveira and Bosco (2013) working with Copernicia hospita, where they obtained shorter time to emergency with small seeds.

It is known that the improvement of the methodology for electrical conductivity test in seeds should be carried out with strong scientific background, seeking to conform it to the conditions intrinsic to the species. The observed results indicated that the electrical conductivity test was efficient to assess the feasibility of A. mangium seeds, providing important information for decision making about the best use of seed lots according to vigor.

Seeds from trees 10 years old present a higher germination percent and germination speed than seeds of six-year old trees. Small seeds of Acacia mangium present greater electrical conductivity and percentage of water imbibition than large seeds, to 120 hours.

The immersion of A. mangium seeds into 40 mL of distilled water in plastic containers of 180 mL, is recommended for the determination of the electrical conductivity, after dormancy break. The ratio of electrolytes by seed mass after 24 hours of immersion in water, turns electrical conductivity test more accurate concerning A. mangium seeds.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

To CNPq, Embrapa Roraima and to Empresa FIT Manejo Florestal do Brasil Ltda., for the structural and financial support. Results are part of the CNPq Universal 2011 project.

REFERENCES

Alves, E. U., Bruno, R. L. A., Oliveira, A. P., Alves, A. U., & Paula, R. C. de. (2005). Influencia do tamanho e da procedencia de sementes de Mimosa caesalpiniifolia Benth. sobre a germinacao e vigor. Revista Arvore, 29, 877-885.

Araldi, C. G., & Coelho, M. M. (2015). pH do Exsudato na Avaliacao da Viabilidade de Sementes de Araucaria angustifolia. Floresta e Ambiente, 22, 426-433. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.082314.

Barbieri, A. P. P, Menezes, N. L., Conceicao, G. M. & Tunes, L. M. (2012). Teste de lixiviacao de potassio para a avaliacao do vigor de sementes de arroz. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 34, 117-124. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222012000100015.

Balieiro, F. de C., Dias, L. E., Franco, A. A., Campello, E. F. C., & Faria, S. M. de. (2004). Acumulo de nutrientes na parte aerea, na serapilheira acumulada sobre o solo e decomposicao de filodios de Acacia mangium Willd. Ciencia Florestal, 14, 59-65.

Bewley, J. D., Bradford, K. J., Hilhorst, H. W. M., & Nonogaki, H. (2013). Seeds: physiology of development, germination and dormancy. New York, USA: Springer.

Brasil. (2009). Regras para analises de sementes. Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento. Mapa/ ACS. Brasilia, DF: Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuaria.

Cherobini, E. A. I., Muniz, M. F. B., & Blume, E. (2008). Avaliacao da qualidade de sementes e mudas de cedro. Ciencia Florestal, 18, 65-73.

Coutinho, W. M., Silva-Mann, R., Vieira, M. G. G. C., Machado, C. F., & Machado, J. C. (2007). Qualidade sanitaria e fisiologica de sementes de milho submetidas a termoterapia e condicionamento fisiologico. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 32, 458-464. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0100-41582007000600002

Duarte, E. F., Carneiro, I. F., Silva N. F., & Guimaraes, N. N. R. (2010). Caracteristicas fisicas e germinacao de sementes de Dyckia goehringii Gross & Rauh (Bromeliaceae) sob diferentes temperaturas. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, 40, 422-429.

Edmond, J. B., & Drapala, W. J. (1965). The effects of temperature, sand and soil and acetone on germination of okra seed. Proceedings of the American Journal Society for Horticultural Science, 71, 428-434.

Ferreira, D. F. (2011). Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, 35, 1039-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1413-70542011000600001.

Hilst, P. C., Dias, D. C. F. S., Alvarenga, E. M., & Souza, B. L. (2012). Test of exudates color hues for evaluating the physiological potential of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) seeds. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 34, 212-217. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/ S0101-31222012000200004.

Ibama-Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renovaveis. Ecossistemas brasileiros. (2015).

Labouriau, L. G. A germinacao das sementes. (1983). Washington: Secretaria geral da OEA.

Lopes, M. M., Silva, C. B., & Vieira, R. D. (2013). Physiological potential of eggplant seeds. Journal of Seed Science, 35, 225-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S2317-15372013000200012.

Malta, M. R., Pereira, R. G. F. A., & Chagas, S. J. R. (2005). Condutividade eletrica e lixiviacao de potassio do exsudato de graos de cafe: alguns fatores que podem influenciar essas avaliacoes. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia, 29, 1015-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1413-70542005000500015

Matos, A. C. B., Borges, E. E. L., & Silva, L. J. (2015). Fisiologia da germinacao de sementes de Dalbergia nigra (Vell.) Allemao ex Benth. sob diferentes temperaturas e tempos de exposicao. Revista Arvore, 39, 115-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-67622015000100011.

Neves, J. M. G., Brandao Junior, D. S., Silva, H. P., Brandao, A. A., & Sales, N. L. P. (2010). Padrao de absorcao de agua em sementes de cutieira. Revista Verde, 5, 190-195.

Oliveira, A. B., & Bosco, M. R. O. (2013). Biometria, determinacao da curva de absorcao de agua em sementes e emergencia inicial de plantulas de Copernicia hospita Martius. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia, 8, 66-74.

Pagliarini, M. K., Nasser, M. D., Nasser, F. A. C. M., Cavichioli, J. C., & Castilho, R. M. M. (2014). Influencia do tamanho de sementes e substratos na germinacao e biometria de plantulas de jatoba. Tecnologia & Ciencia Agropecuaria, 8, 33-38. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222011000100016.

Rosa, H., Martins, S. S., & Silva, O. H. (2006). Atividade florestal nos municipios de Telemaco Borba, Ortigueira, Reserva, Imbau e Tibagi: caracterizacao e perspectivas do setor. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 28, 41-45.

Rodrigues, A. P. D. C., Kohl, M. C., Pedrinho, D. R., Arias, E. R. A., & Favero, S. (2008). Tratamentos para superar a dormencia de sementes de Acacia mangium Willd. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 30, 279-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v30i2.1786.

Smiderle, O. J., Mourao Junior, M., & Sousa, R. C. P. (2005). Tratamentos pre-germinativos em sementes de Acacia. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 27, 78-85.

Souza, C. R., Rossi, L. M. B., Azevedo, C. P., & Lima, R. M. B. (2004). Comportamento de Acacia mangium e de clones de Eucalyptus grandis x E. urophylla em plantios experimentais na Amazonia Central. Scientia Forestalis, 65, 95-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S0100-67622007000100012.

Torres, S. B. Influencia do tamanho das sementes de Acacia gomifera no desenvolvimento das mudas. 1994. Agropecuaria Catarinense, 7, 5. http://www.scielo. br/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000138&pid=S01006762200500060000600038&lng=en

Vieira, R. D., & Krzyzanowski, F. C. (1999). Teste de condutividade eletrica. In F. C. Krzyzanowski, R. D. Vieira, & J. B. Franca-Neto (Ed.), Vigor de sementes: conceitos e testes. Londrina (pp. 1-24). ABRATES.

Daniel Luiz de Oliveira (1), Oscar Jose Smiderle (2), Pollyana Priscila Schuertz Paulino (1) & Aline das Gracas Souza (2)

(1.) Universidade Federal de Roraima. POSAGRO. Campus Cauame, BR 174, Km 12, Monte Cristo, CEP: 69300-000, Boa Vista-RR; daniel_ufam@hotmail.com, polly-prys@hotmail.com

(2.) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria--Embrapa Roraima. Caixa Postal 133, 69301-970, Boa Vista-RR., Brasil; oscar.smiderle@embrapa.br, alineufla@hotmail.com

Received 25-XI-2015.

Corrected 05-VII-2016.

Accepted 05-VIII-2016.

Caption: Fig. 1. Water absorption curves in small and large seeds of A. mangium, with tegument dormancy, coming from trees of ages of 10 (A), 8 (B) and 6 years (C). Boa Vista, Roraima.

Caption: Fig. 2. Water absorption curves obtained for the average values of the three lots of small seeds and three lots of large seeds of A. mangium, with tegument dormancy break. Boa Vista, Roraima.
TABLE 1

Means of 1 000 seed mass (g), germination (G, %), hard seeds (D, %),
average germination time (TMG, days) and germination speed (VG,
index) of Acacia mangium small and large seeds, without and with
tegument dormancy break, coming from trees of different ages. Boa
Vista, Roraima

Age   Size    Mass    Without seed dormancy break
              1000
              seeds   G   D    TMG    VG

10    Small   7.834   2   98    6    0.09
      Large   9.621   2   96    8    0.23
8     Small   7.601   2   94    5    0.30
      Large   9.743   6   90    6    0.89
6     Small   7.166   0   98   --    0.00
      Large   8.759   0   98   --    0.00

Means of the tree-aging

10    --      8.727   2   97    7    0.16
8     --      8.672   4   92    6    0.59
6     --      7.963   0   98   --    0.00

Means of the seed size

--    Small   7.534   1   97    6    0.13
--    Large   9.374   3   95    7    0.37

Age        With seed dormancy break

          G     D      TMG     VG

10    93   a    0    7    ab   6.99   a
      87   ab   0    8    bc   6.18   b
8     91   a    0    7    a    7.44   a
      82   b    0    8    bc   5.73   bc
6     74   c    0    8    bc   5.21   cd
      72   b    0    8    c    4.71   d

Means of the tree-aging

10    90   a    0    7    a    6.58   a
8     86   a    0    7    a    6.58   a
6     73   b    0    8    b    4.96   b

Means of the seed size

--    85   a    0    7    a    6.54   a
--    81   b    0    8    b    5.53   b

* In the column, means followed by the same letter do not differ
from one another by the Tukey test (P>0.05).

TABLE 2

Means of initial mass and after 24 hours' immersion (g), degree of
moisture (U, %), electrical conductivity (CE, [micro]S/cm/g) and
electrical conductivity with the mass after 24 hours of immersion
(CE (24h), [micro]S/cm/g) obtained from small and large seeds of A.
mangium, without and with tegument dormancy break, coming from tree
of different ages. Experiments I, II, III. Boa Vista, Roraima, 2012

Experiment   Age   Size    Initial mass   Mass immersion    U%

Without seed dormancy break
I            10    Small      0.3648          0.3830       12.3
                   Large      0.4550          0.4790       13.1
              8    Small      0.3460          0.3670       13.8
                   Large      0.4483          0.4808       13.1
              6    Small      0.3453          0.3563       10.2
                   Large      0.4110          0.4333       12.8
                   mean       0.3950          0.4165       12.6
II           10    Small      0.3635          0.3760       11.1
                   Large      0.4555          0.4875       15.3
              8    Small      0.3483          0.3618       11.1
                   Large      0.4470          0.4883       14.7
              6    Small      0.3353          0.3520       12.3
                   Large      0.4128          0.4475       15.9
                   mean       0.3937          0.4188       13.4
III          10    Small      0.3568          0.3845       15.3
                   Large      0.4515          0.4788       13.6
              8    Small      0.3488          0.3783       13.6
                   Large      0.4475          0.4750       12.8
              6    Small      0.3353          0.3595       14.7
                   Large      0.4120          0.4370       14.8
                   mean       0.3920          0.4188       14.1

With seed dormancy break
I            10    Small      0.3670          0.7788       59.1
                   Large      0.4545          0.9858       59.2
              8    Small      0.3475          0.7855       60.8
                   Large      0.4483          0.9600       58.5
              6    Small      0.3428          0.7603       59.5
                   Large      0.4115          0.8838       59.3
                   mean       0.3953          0.8590       59.4
II           10    Small      0.3650          0.8098       60.9
                   Large      0.4540          0.9753       60.2
              8    Small      0.3473          0.7925       61.6
                   Large      0.4465          0.9583       58.9
              6    Small      0.3330          0.7418       61.4
                   Large      0.4130          0.8905       59.0
                   mean       0.3931          0.8613       60.3
III          10    Small      0.3583          0.8170       61.7
                   Large      0.4515          0.9898       59.3
              8    Small      0.3485          0.7963       61.4
                   Large      0.4478          0.9735       59.1
              6    Small      0.3355          0.7955       62.3
                   Large      0.4108          0.8963       58.6
                   mean       0.3920          0.8780       60.4

Experiment   Age   Size           CE           CE (24h)

Without seed dormancy break
I            10    Small   23.018     a     21.921    a
                   Large   27.673     a     26.325    a
              8    Small   29.222     a     27.328    a
                   Large   35.220     a     33.043    a
              6    Small   29.589     a     28.499    a
                   Large   30.796     a     29.193    a
                   mean    29.253           27.718
II           10    Small   28.919     a     27.945    a
                   Large   36.924    ab     34.152    ab
              8    Small   37.705    ab     36.264    ab
                   Large   55.181     d     50.075    d
              6    Small   44.508    bc     42.346    bc
                   Large   55.820    cd     51.856    cd
                   mean    43.176           40.440
III          10    Small   43.187    ab     40.020    a
                   Large   37.949     a     36.197    a
              8    Small   52.619    ab     48.567    ab
                   Large   41.361     a     39.182    a
              6    Small   58.841     b     54.729    b
                   Large   46.481    ab     43.830    ab
                   mean    46.740           43.754

With seed dormancy break
I            10    Small   125.759    a     59.248    a
                   Large   135.806    a     62.619    a
              8    Small   140.583    a     62.170    a
                   Large   123.144    a     57.497    a
              6    Small   142.664    a     64.278    a
                   Large   136.572    a     63.589    a
                   mean    134.088          61.567
II           10    Small   248.367   abc   111.932    ab
                   Large   221.941   abc   103.210    a
              8    Small   249.729   bc    109.434    ab
                   Large   217.113    a    101.178    a
              6    Small   264.854    c    118.908    b
                   Large   236.573   abc   109.669    ab
                   mean    239.763         109.055
III          10    Small   266.369   bc    116.787    bc
                   Large   227.593    a    103.756    a
              8    Small   237.510   ab    103.942    a
                   Large   224.751    a    103.213    a
              6    Small   287.482    c    121.209    c
                   Large   234.194   ab    107.404    ab
                   mean    246.316         109.385

I--75 mL of water in 180 mL container; II--40 mL of water in 180 mL
glasses; and III--40 mL of water in 50 mL glasses. * In each
experiment, means followed by the same letter in the column do not
differ from one another by the Tukey test (P<0.05).
COPYRIGHT 2016 Universidad de Costa Rica
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Luiz de Oliveira, Daniel; Smiderle, Oscar Jose; Priscila Schuertz Paulino, Pollyana; das Gracas Souz
Publication:Revista de Biologia Tropical
Article Type:Report
Date:Dec 1, 2016
Words:5149
Previous Article:Reproduccion de pomacea flagellata (mollusca: ampullariidae) en la Laguna de Bacalar, Quintana Roo, Mexico.
Next Article:Utilizacion de conocimiento indigena para relacionar el mapeado hiper-temporal de coberturas de suelo con el uso del territorio en el amazonas...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters