AOM guideline failed to rein in prescribing.
They analyzed data on 1,114 acute otitis media (AOM) patients aged 6 months to 12 years that was collected between 2002 and 2006 as part of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, comparing the clinical management strategies during the 30-month periods before and after the publication of the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics and American Academy of Family Physicians clinical practice guideline.
The primary study end point was the rate of AOM encounters with no reported antibiotic prescribing. Secondary end points were predictors of AOM encounters at which no antibiotic prescribing was reported and the rates of antibiotic prescribing and analgesic prescribing. Eighty-two percent of visits were with pediatricians, 14% were with family physicians, and 4% were with other physicians (Pediatrics 2010;125:214-20).
During the study overall, antibiotics were not prescribed in 13% of the visits, according to the analysis. In the 30 months prior to the publication of the clinical guideline, 11% of the AOM diagnoses were managed without an antibiotic, compared with 16% after the guideline publication, which does not represent a significant difference, they reported.
"It seems that, despite the guideline's endorsement, physicians have been reluctant to frequently use the observation option, perhaps because of perceptions of parental reluctance to accept this approach and barriers to follow-up," they wrote
"It is encouraging that children who did not receive antibiotics were also less likely to present with symptoms of severe infection, such as fever or ear pain," the authors wrote.
An unexpected finding, was the fact that amoxicillin/clavulanate prescribing, which the guideline recommends for the treatment of children with severe infection and those with treatment failure, decreased from 23% to 16%. This is, however, consistent with physicians' historical lack of enthusiasm for prescribing the combination treatment for severe infections, they wrote.
Physicians in the study "were choosing cefdinir as a second-line agent instead, perhaps because of a more convenient dosing schedule, a lower incidence of diarrhea, or more aggressive marketing," the investigators wrote. Its use doubled from 7% to 14% of all antibiotics prescribed after publication of the guideline.
The proportion of visits at which amoxicillin was prescribed increased from 40% to 49%, which is consistent with the guideline.
The rate of analgesic prescribing also increased from 14% to 24%--an indication that pediatric providers "'have accepted this strong recommendation to treat the pain that is often associated with AOM, which is a reversal of previous findings showing that treating otalgia is not prioritized by clinicians," Dr. Coco and his associates wrote. "It would seem that physicians were more willing to adopt a recommendation from the guideline to add a treatment [analgesic agents] rather than to withhold one [antibiotics]."
The study authors reported having no conflicts of interest.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||INFECTIOUS DISEASES; acute otitis media|
|Publication:||Family Practice News|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2010|
|Previous Article:||'Cough trick' takes sting out of getting shots.|
|Next Article:||Third wave of H1N1, viral reassortment top concerns.|