Printer Friendly

AN EXTREME POINT THEOREM ON HYPERSPACE.

1. Introduction

Suppose X is a Banach space equipped with the norm topology (denoted by ||*||) as well as the weak topology (denoted by [T.sub.w]). Let CC (X) ={A [subset.bar] X : A is a non-empty compact convex subset of X}, WCC (X) ={A [subset.bar] X : A is a non-empty weakly compact, convex subset of X} and BCC (X) ={A [subset.bar] X : A is a non-empty bounded, closed, convex subset of X}: Then (CC (X); h) ; (WCC (X); h) and (BCC (X); h) are known as the hyperspaces over the underlying space (X; ||*||). If [bar.X] = {[bar.x] = {[bar.x]} : x [member of] X}; then ([bar.X]; h) is isometrically isomorphic to the underlying space (X; ||*||). Thus every theorem proved on the hyperspaces is a natural extension of its corresponding counterpart of the underlying space (X; ||*||).

Blaschke [2] proved that every infinite sequence {[A.sub.n]g with [A.sub.n] [member of] K where K is an h-bounded and h-closed subset of the hyperspace (CC ([R.sup.n]); h) contains a convergent subsequence [mathematical expression not reproducible] (i:e:, there exists a subsequence [mathematical expression not reproducible] [subset.bar] K and [A.sub.0] [member of] K such that [mathematical expression not reproducible]. Blaschke's Theorem is an extension of the classical Heine-Borel Theorem which states that every closed and bounded subset K [??] [R.sup.n] is sequentially compact. Many mathematicians have studied convergence of convex sets on different spaces ([1], [11], [12]):

In 1986, De Blasi and Myjak ([4]) introduced the concept of weak sequential convergence on the hyperspace WCC (X): Suppose [A.sub.n]; A [member of] WCC (X); they define [A.sub.n] converges to [A.sub.0] weakly ([mathematical expression not reproducible]) if and only if [mathematical expression not reproducible] (x*) [right arrow] [mathematical expression not reproducible] (x*) = sup{x* (a) | a [member of] [A.sub.0]} and proved an infinite dimensional version of Blaschke's Theorem and other results. The notion of weak topology [T.sub.w] has been introduced and investigated by Hu and company ([3], [7], [8], [9], [10]). They showed that Browder-Kirk's fixed point theorem can be extended to the hyperspace WCC (X) equipped with Hausdorff metric h as well as a certain weak topology [T.sub.w] and many other results. We remind the readers that many fundamental results that are valid on the underlying space X cannot be extended to hyperspace. For example, it is well-known that every ||*||-closed (originally closed, strongly closed) convex set is also [T.sub.w]-closed (weakly closed). Also for every compact convex set K [subset.bar] X and x [??] K; there exists some x* [member of] X* such that [mathematical expression not reproducible]. Examples have been given in [7] that these results cannot be extended to hyperspace.

Suppose now X is a locally convex topological vector space and X* its dual space. Let X be equipped with the original topology T as well as the weak topology [T.sub.w], and WCC (X) ={A [subset.bar] X : A is a [T.sub.w]-compact convex subset of X} is the corresponding hyperspace. A topology [T.sub.w] will be introduced on X and the main result of this paper is to show that every [T.sub.w]-compact, convex subset of WCC (X) has an extreme point. This result is an extension of the classical Krein-Milman Theorem.

2. NOTATIONS AND PRELIMINARIES

Let X be a Banach space and X* its topological dual, and BCC (X) is the collection of all non-empty bounded, closed, convex subsets of X: In general we have CC (X) [??] WCC (X) [??] BCC (X): For reflexive Banach space X, we have WCC (X) = BCC (X): If X is finite dimensional, then CC (X) = WCC (X) = BCC (X): To avoid avoid confusion we shall use small letters a; b; c; ... ; z to denote elements of the underlying space X; capital letters A;B;... ; Z to denote elements of the hyperspaces CC (X); WCC (X) and BCC (X) as well as subsets of X; e.g., A;B [subset.bar] X and A;B[member of] BCC (X): We shall use script letters to denote subsets of the corresponding hyperspaces, e.g., K [subset.bar] BCC (X); W [subset.bar] BCC (X): For A; B [member of] BCC (X); let A + B = a + b : a [member of] A; b [member of] B} ; N (A; [epsilon]) ={x [member of] X : d(x;a) = ||x - a|| < [epsilon] for some a [epsilon] A} and h(A;B) = inf{[epsilon] > 0 : A [subset.bar] N(B;[epsilon]);B [subset.bar] N (A; [epsilon])}, equivalently, [mathematical expression not reproducible]. The metric h just defined is known as the Hausdorff metric and (BCC (X); h) is known to be a complete metric space. Since h is induced by the ||*|| of the underlying space X; h is closely related to the norm (||*||) as well as x* [member of] X*: The following lemmas give some elementary properties of the Hausdorff h and its relationship with them.

Lemma 1. Suppose A; B;C; D [member of] WCC (X) and a [member of] C: Then we have

(i) h (A; {0}) = sup f||a|| : a [member of] A} ; (ii) h (A + B; C + D) [less than or equal to] h (A; C) + h (B; D); (iii) h ([alpha]A; [alpha]B) = |[alpha]| h (A; B); (iv) h([[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]]; [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]]) = max {|[b.sub.1] [a.sub.1]|; |[b.sub.2] [a.sub.2]|} for[[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]] ; [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]] [member of] (CC (R); h):

Lemma 2. Suppose A; B [member of] WCC (X) and x*;y* [member of] X*: Then

(i) x* (A); x* (B) [member of] (CC (C); h);

(ii) A = B if and only if x* (A) = x* (B) for each x* [member of] X*;

(iii) h (x* (A); x* (B)) [less than or equal to] ||x* || h (A; B);

(iv) h (x* (A); y* (A)) [less than or equal to] ||x* - y* || h (A; f0}):

Proof. Since x* : (X;[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (C; ||*||) is continuous and linear, it follows that x* (A) ;x* (B) are compact, convex subsets of C and (i) is proved.

If A = B; then x* (A) = x* (B) for each x* [member of] X*: Suppose A [not equal to] B; without loss of generality, we may assume there exists some b0 [member of] B such that [b.sub.0] [??] A: It follows then from Hahn-Banach Theorem that there exists some x* [member of] X* which separates b0 from A; i:e:; there exists x* [member of] X* such that sup fRex* (a) : a [member of] A} < Re x* ([b.sub.0]) : That is a contradiction and (ii) is proved.

(iii) and (iv) follow from that

||x* (a) x* (b)|| = ||x* (a b)|| < ||x*|| * ||a b|| ; ||x* (a) y* (a)|| < ||x* y*|| * ||a||

and the definition of Hausdorff metric.

Now, it follows from Lemma 2 (i) that x* maps the space WCC (X) into the space CC (C) or x* : (WCC (X); h) [right arrow] (CC (C); h): Also, by Lemma 2 (iii) that x* : (WCC (X); h) [right arrow] (CC (C); h) is continuous. Note that both the domain and the range are now hyperspaces endowed with corresponding Hausdorff metric h: Now, recall that the weak topology [T.sub.w] on X is defined to be the weakest topology such that each x* : (X;[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (C; |*|) is continuous. Analogously, we may define the weak topology on WCC (X) as follows:

Definition 1. The weak topology [T.sub.w] on WCC (X) is defined to be the weakest topology on WCC (X) such that each x* : (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (CC (C) ;h) is continuous. Thus a typical [T.sub.w]-neighborhood of A [member of] WCC (X) is denoted by W (A; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]) = {B [member of] WCC (X) ; h([x*.sub.i](B); [x*.sub.i](A)) < [epsilon] fori = 1; 2; ... ; n; [epsilon] > 0}:

As mentioned in the introduction, several results have been extended to the hyperspace WCC (X): In the next section, we shall further extend the notion of hyperspace and its corresponding topology [T.sub.w] where the underlying space X is a locally convex topological vector space instead of a Banach space and prove an extreme point theorem which is an extension of the classical Krein-Milman Theorem.

3. Main Results

In this section, X is assumed to be a locally convex topological vector space, X* its dual space and X is endowed with original topology T as well as weak topology [T.sub.w]: Let WCC (X) = {A [subset.bar] X : A is a non-empty weakly compact, convex subset of X}: Since each x* is also weakly continuous (i:e: x* : (X;[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (C; |*|) is continuous and linear), it follows that for each A [member of] WCC (X); x* (A) is a compact convex subset of the complex plane C: Thus each x* is a mapping from the set WCC (X) into the metric space (CC (C); h): Define [T.sub.w] to be the weakest topology and WCC (X) such that each x* : (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (CC (C) ;h) is continuous. Denote B(x*(A);[epsilon]) = {B [member of] CC (C) : h(x*(A);B) < [epsilon]} for [epsilon] > 0:

Some basic properties of the weak topology [T.sub.w] are stated in the following lemma.

Lemma 3. (a) The collection fW (A; [x*.sub.1]; [x*.sub.2]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]) : xi [member of] X* fori = 1; 2; ... ; n; [epsilon] > 0} is a local base at A [member of] WCC (X) where

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

(b) [T.sub.w] is a Hausdorff topology on WCC (X); i:e:; distinct A;B [member of] WCC (X) have disjoint neighborhoods containing them.

Proof. (a) Since x* : (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (CC (C); h) is continuous, (B([x*.sub.i](A);[epsilon]) is open in (CC (C); h); we have [([x*.sub.i]).sup.-1](B([x*.sub.i](A); [epsilon]) is open in (WCC (X); [T.sub.w]); i:e:; W(A;[x*.sub.i]; [epsilon]) = [([x*.sub.i]).sup.-1](B([x*.sub.i](A);[epsilon]) [member of] [T.sub.w] and W (A; [x*.sub.1];[x*.sub.2]; ... ;[x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]) being the finite intersection of open sets is also open.

(b) Let A;B[member of] WCC (X) with A [not equal to] B: We may assume without loss of generality that there exists some a [member of] A such that a [member of] B: Since B is a [T.sub.w]-compact subset of the locally convex topological vector space (X;[T.sub.w]) ; it follows from the Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem that there exists some x* [member of] X* such that sup Rex* (b) < Rex* (a): Let [delta] = Rex* (a) [mathematical expression not reproducible] (b) > 0: We have Rex* (a) Rex* (b) [greater than or equal to] [delta] for all b [member of] B which in turn implies that

(1) |x* (a) x* (b) | [greater than or equal to] |Re x* (a) Re x* (b)] [greater than or equal to] [delta]:

Suppose 0 < [epsilon] < [delta] is chosen, we have |x* (a) x* (b)\ > [epsilon] for all b [member of] B: Claim that W(A; x*; [epsilon]/2]) [intersection] W(B; x*; [epsilon]/2]) = [??]: Otherwise, there exists some D [member of] W(A; x*; [epsilon]/2])[intersection] W(B; x*; [epsilon]/2]) and we have h(x*(D); x*(A)) < [epsilon]/2]; h(x*(D); x*(B)) < [epsilon]/2]: Consequently x*(A) [subset] N(x*(D); [epsilon]/2]); x*(D) [subset] N(x*(B); [epsilon]/2]): Hence for the given a [member of] A; there exists some d [member of] D such that |x* (a) - x* (d)| < |; and for the d [member of] D; there exists some b [member of] B such that |x* (d) - x* (b)| < [epsilon]/2] which in turn implies that

|x* (a) x* (b)| [less than or equal to] |x* (a) x* (d)| + |x* (d) x* (b)| < [epsilon] < [delta]:

That is a contradiction to the inequality (1) and the proof is complete.

Suppose A;B [member of] WCC (X): Then A; B are weakly compact, convex subsets of X: Since addition and scalar multiplication are continuous operations on (X; [T.sub.w]) ; we have A + B; [alpha]A are weakly compact, convex subsets of X; i:e:; A + B; [alpha]A [member of] WCC (X): Thus we may define, algebraic line segments, convex sets, extremal subsets and extreme points on the hyperspace WCC (X) analogous to their counterparts on the underlying space X:

Definition 2. (a) [A;B] = {[alpha]A + (1 - [alpha])B : A; B [member of] WCC (X); 0 [less than or equal to] [alpha] [less than or equal to] 1} is called the closed line segment joining A and B:

(b) A subset K [subset] WCC (X) is said to be convex if and only if [A.sub.1]; [A.sub.2];... ; [A.sub.n] [member of]

[mathematical expression not reproducible]

(c) A mapping T : WCC (X) [right arrow] WCC (X) is said to be affine if and only if T([alpha]A + (1 - a)B) = [alpha]T(A) + (1 - [alpha])T(B) where 0 [less than or equal to] [alpha] [less than or equal to] 1:

(d) Suppose [K.sub.1];[K.sub.2] [subset] (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) are closed ([T.sub.w]-closed); convex subsets. Then [K.sub.1] is said to be an extremal subset of [K.sub.2] if and only if A; B [member of] [K.sub.2] and [alpha]A + (1 - [alpha])B [member of] [K.sub.1] for some 0 < [alpha] < 1 implies that A; B [member of] [K.sub.1]:

(e) Suppose K is a [T.sub.w]-closed, convex subset of WCC (X): Then P is said to be an extreme point of K if and only if A; B [member of] K; 0 < a < 1; [alpha]A + (1 - [alpha])B = P implies A = B = P:

We state the following lemmas whose proofs are similar as in the underlying space X:

Lemma 4. Suppose K is a [T.sub.w]-closed, convex subset of the hyperspace (WCC (X); [T.sub.w]): Then

(a) If P [member of] K; then P is an extreme point of K if and only if {P} is an extremal subset of K:

(b) If [K.sub.1] [subset] [K.sub.2] [subset] [K.sub.3] are [T.sub.w]-closed, convex subsets, [K.sub.1] is an extremal subset of [K.sub.2]; and [K.sub.2] is an extremal subset of [K.sub.3]; then [K.sub.1] is an extremal subset of [K.sub.3]:

The next lemma is essential in the proof of our main theorem.

Lemma 5. (a) Suppose [[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]]; [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]] [member of] (CC ([R.sup.1]) ; h) : Then h([[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]]; [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]]) = max{|[b.sub.1] [a.sub.1]| ; |[b.sub.2] [a.sub.2]|}; and the mapping T : (CC [R.sup.1]) ; h) [right arrow] ([R.sup.1]; |*|) defined by T([[a.sub.1];[a.sub.2]]) = [a.sub.2] is a continuous (in fact, nonexpansive), affine mapping.

(b) Suppose [bar.X] = {[bar.x] = {x} : x [member of] X} [subset] WCC (X): Then the mapping T : X [right arrow] [bar.X] [subset] WCC (X) defined by Tx = x is an isomorphic homeomorphism of (X;[T.sub.w]) onto (X;[T.sub.w]):

Proof (a) That h([[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]] ; [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]]) = max{|[b.sub.1] [a.sub.1]| ; |[b.sub.2] [a.sub.2]|} follows immediately from the definition of Hausdorff metric. Next, [[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]] + [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]] = [[a.sub.1] + [b.sub.1]; [a.sub.2] + [b.sub.2]] ; [alpha] [[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]] = [[alpha][a.sub.1]; a[a.sub.2]] implies

T([alpha] [[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]] + (1 - [alpha]) [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]]) = T([[alpha][a.sub.1]; [alpha][a.sub.2]] + [(1 - [alpha])[b.sub.1]; (1 - [alpha])[b.sub.2]]) = T([[alpha][a.sub.1] + (1 - [alpha])[b.sub.1]; [alpha][a.sub.2] + (1 - [alpha])[b.sub.2]]) = [alpha][a.sub.2] + (1 - [alpha])[b.sub.2] = [alpha]T([[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]]) + (1 - [alpha])T([[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]])

where 0 < [alpha] < 1: Consequently T is affine. Finally

|T([[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]]) T([[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]])| = |[a.sub.2] [b.sub.2]| [greater than or equal to] max{ [[a.sub.1] [b.sub.1]| ; |[a.sub.2] [b.sub.2]| = h([[a.sub.1] ; [a.sub.2]]; [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]])

showing that T is nonexpansive.

(b) Obviously, T : X [right arrow] [bar.X] is one to one and onto. Also T(x + y) = x + y = {x + y} = {x} + {y} = [bar.x] + [bar.y] = T(x) + T(y) and T([alpha]x) = [bar.[alpha]x] = {[alpha]x} = [alpha]{x} = [alpha][bar.x] = [alpha]T(x) showing that T is linear.

y [member of] w(x; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]) implies that |x*(y) x*(x)| < [epsilon] for i = 1; 2; ... ;n; which in turn implies that h(x*([bar.y]); x*([bar.x])) = h(x*(Ty);[x*.sub.i](Tx) < [epsilon] for i = 1; 2; ... ; n: Hence Ty = [bar.y] [member of] W ([bar.x]; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]): Similarly [bar.y] [member of] W ([bar.x]; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]) implies y [member of] w (x; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]): Consequently T(w (x; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon])) = W ([bar.x] = Tx; [x*.sub.1]; ... ; [x*.sub.n]; [epsilon]) and the proof is complete.

Our main theorem is an extension of the classical Krein-Milman's Extreme Point Theorem to the hyperspace (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]):

Theorem 1. Suppose X is a locally convex topological vector space equipped with original topology T as well as weak topology [T.sub.w]; and (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) is the corresponding hyperspace. Suppose K is a [T.sub.w]-compact, convex subset of (WCC (X); [T.sub.w]): Then K has an extreme point in K:

Proof. Let [OHM] denote the collection of all non-empty, [T.sub.w]-closed, convex subsets of K. [OHM] [not equal to] [??] since K [member of] [OHM]: Define a partial order in [OHM] by inverse inclusion, i:e:; [K.sub.2] [less than or equal to] [K.sub.1] if and only if [K.sub.1] [subset] [K.sub.2]: If {[K.sub.i]}i[member of]I [subset] [subset] is a totally ordered subset, we shall show that [mathematical expression not reproducible] is an upper bound of [{[K.sub.i]}.sub.i[member of]I]: Each [K.sub.i] is [T.sub.w]-compact, convex and [{[K.sub.i]}.sub.i[member of]I] has finite intersection implies that [K.sub.0] is a non-empty [T.sub.w]-compact, convex set. Suppose we have A;B [member of] K;0 < [alpha] < 1 and [alpha]A + (1 - [alpha])B [member of] [K.sub.0]: Since [K.sub.0] [subset] Ki for each i; we have [alpha]A + (1 - [alpha])B [member of] [K.sub.i] which in turn implies that A; B [member of] [K.sub.i] because [K.sub.i] is an extremal subset of K: Thus A; B [member of] [K.sub.0] showing that [K.sub.0] is an extremal subset of K and consequently [K.sub.0] is an upper bound of [{[K.sub.i]}.sub.i[member of]I]. It follows now from Zorn's Lemma that Q has a maximal element, denoted by [K.sub.[infinity]]: We claim that [K.sub.[infinity]] is a singleton. Otherwise, there exists [A.sub.0];[B.sub.0] [member of] [K.sub.[infinity]] with [A.sub.0] [not equal to] [B.sub.0] ; without loss of generality, assume there exists some [b.sub.0] [member of] [B.sub.0] such that [b.sub.0] [??] [A.sub.0]: By Hahn-Banach Separation Theorem, there exists some x* [member of] X* such that [mathematical expression not reproducible] Rex* (a) < Rex* ([b.sub.0]) : Let Rex* ([A.sub.0]) = [[a.sub.1]; [a.sub.2]]; Rex* ([B.sub.0]) = [[b.sub.1]; [b.sub.2]] [member of] CC(R); we have [a.sub.2] = sup Rex* (a) < Rex* ([b.sub.0]) [less than or equal to] [b.sub.2]: Define G : (CC(R); h) [right arrow] (R; |*|) by G([[a.sub.1];[a.sub.2]]) = [a.sub.2]: It follows from Lemma 5 (a) that G is a nonexpansive (hence continuous) affine mapping.

Next, let F : (WCC(X);[T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (R; |*|) be defined by F(A) = G(Rex* (A)): F : ([K.sub.[infinity]]; [T.sub.w]) [right arrow] (R; |*|) is continuous implies F attains its maximum on [K.sub.[infinity]]; i:e:; there exists [b.sub.[infinity]] [member of] R and [B.sub.[infinity]] [member of] [K.sub.[infinity]] such that F([B.sub.[infinity]]) = [b.sub.[infinity]] = [mathematical expression not reproducible] = [mathematical expression not reproducible]. Since [a.sub.2] < [b.sub.2] < [b.sub.[infinity]]; [A.sub.0] [??] [F.sup.1]([b.sub.[infinity]]): Claim that [F.sup.1]([b.sub.[infinity]]) is an extremal subset of [K.sub.[infinity]]: For that purpose, we let D; E [member of] [K.sub.[infinity]], 0 < [alpha] < 1 with [alpha]D+(1 - [alpha])E [member of] [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]): Thus F([alpha]D + (1 - [alpha])E) = [b.sub.[infinity]] which implies that [alpha]F(D) + (1 - [alpha])F(E) = [b.sub.[infinity]]: Also D;E [member of] [K.sub.[infinity]] implies that F(D); F(E) [less than or equal to] [b.sub.[infinity]] and consequently, [alpha]F(D) + (1 - [alpha])F(E) [less than or equal to] [b.sub.[infinity]]: Hence F(D);F(E) = [b.sub.[infinity]] that implies D;E [member of] [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]): Otherwise, we would have [alpha]F(D) + (1 - [alpha])F(E) < [b.sub.[infinity]]; contradicting that [alpha]F(D) + (1 - [alpha])F(E) = [b.sub.[infinity]]: Now that [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]) [subset] [K.sub.[infinity]]; and [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]) is an extremal subset of [K.sub.[infinity]] implies [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]) [subset] [K.sub.[infinity]]: But [A.sub.0] [??] [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]) implies [F.sup.-1]([b.sub.[infinity]]) & [K.sub.[infinity]] contradicting that [K.sub.[infinity]] is a maximal element. Hence [K.sub.[infinity]] is a singleton, say [K.sub.[infinity]] = {P} proving that P is an extreme point of K and the proof is complete.

The following corollary is the classical Krein-Milman extreme point theorem.

Corollary 1. Let K be a non-empty compact, convex subset of a locally convex topological vector space X: Then K has an extreme point in K:

Proof. Let X a locally convex topological vector space endowed with original topology T as well as weak topology [T.sub.w]; and (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) is the corresponding hyperspace. K is r-compact implies K is [r.sub.w]-compact. It follows from Lemma 5 (b) that [bar.K] = {[bar.x] = {x} : x [member of] K} is a [T.sub.w]-compact, convex subset of (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) and hence has an extreme point [bar.P] = {p} by Theorem 1. Consequently p is an extreme point of K and the proof is complete.

Remark 1. (a) Since Krein-Milman Theorem has numerous important applications in various branches of mathematics, we hope further investigation on the hyperspace (WCC (X) ;[T.sub.w]) will lead to some useful applications.

(b) The study of convex sets has always been interesting and useful. However, the traditional method has relied heavily on support fucntionals. With the [T.sub.w]-topology defined on WCC (X); we hope it will provide an altermative way to study convex sets.

References

[1] M. Baronti and P. L. Papini, Convergence of sequences of sets in Methods of Functional Analysis in Approximation Theory, ISNM 76 (1986)

[2] W. Blaschke, Kreis und Kugel, Leipzig: Verlag von Veit & Co. 1916.

[3] F. S. De Blasi, T. Hu and J.-C. Huang, Weak*-topology and Alaoglu's theorem on yperspace, J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 10 (2009), no. 1, 33-40.

[4] F. S. De Blasi and J. Myjak, Weak convergence of convex sets in Banach spaces, Arch. Math. 47 (1986), no. 5, 448-456.

[5] L. de Branges, The Stone-Weierstrass theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1959), no. 5, 822-824.

[6] L. Hormander, Sur la fonction d'appui des ensembles convexes dans un espace localement convexe, Ark. Mat. 3 (1955), no. 2, 181-186.

[7] J. S. Hu and T. Hu, Krein-Milman's Extreme Point Theorem and Weak Topology on Hyperspace, Taiwanese J. Math. 20, no. 3 (2016) 629-638.

[8] T. Hu and J.-C. Fang, Weak topology and Browder-Kirk's theorem on hyperspace, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 334 (2007), no. 2, 799-803.

[9] T. Hu and J.-C. Huang, Weak topology and Markov-Kakutani theorem on hyperspace, Publ. Math. Debrecen 53 (1998), no. 1-2, 113-117.

[10] T. Hu and J.-C. Huang, Weak and weak* topologies and Brodskii-Milman's theorem on hyperspaces, Taiwanese J. Math. 13 (2009), no. 2A, 459-466.

[11] G. Salinetti and R. J.-B. Wets, On the convergence of sequences of convex sets in finite dimensions, SIAM Rev. 21 (1979), no. 1, 18-33

[12] F. A. Valentine, Convex Sets, McGraw-Hill Series in Higher Mathematics, McGrawHill Book Co., New York, 1964.

JENNIFER SHUEH-INN HU (*)

DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED STATISTICS AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, MING CHUAN UNIVERSITY, GUISHAN, TAOYUAN, TAIWAN

E-mail address: jenhu@mail.mcu.edu.tw

KUEI-LIN TSENG

DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, ALETHEIA UNIVERSITY, TAMSUI, NEW TAIPEI CITY 25103, TAIWAN

E-mail address: kltseng@mail.au.edu.tw

Received March 2, 2017 Accepted August 18, 2017

Key words and phrases. Extreme point, Locally convex topological vector space, Weak topology, Hyperspace, Banach spaces.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Aletheia University
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Hu, Jennifer Shueh-Inn; Tseng, Kuei-Lin
Publication:Tamsui Oxford Journal of Information and Mathematical Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2017
Words:4390
Previous Article:Characterization on N(k)-Mixed Quasi-Einstein Manifold.
Next Article:INNERNESS [sigma]-DERIVATIONS AND INNERNESS [sigma]-HIGHER DERIVATIONS.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |