Printer Friendly


1. Introduction

Neural machine translation constitutes a substitute to the statistical machine translation pattern in diverse languages. (Eriguchi et al., 2019) The prevailing neural machine translation patterns commonly employ word-level modeling to insert input sentences into semantic space (Balica, 2018; Cruciani, 2018; Fabricio, 2016; Lazaroiu, 2018; Mihaila and Mateescu, 2017; Nica, 2018; Popescu, 2017a, b; Radulescu, 2017), but that may not be adequate for the encoder modeling of neural machine translation, particularly for languages where tokenizations are typically confusing, as there may be tokenization inaccuracies which may adversely shape the encoder modeling of neural machine translation, while the adequate tokenization granularity is ambiguous. (Tan et al., 2018)

2. Conceptual Framework and Literature Review

Neural machine translation represents a groundbreaking model, and the attention mechanism (Bolton et al., 2018; Dicu, 2018; Farber, 2017; Machan, 2017; Mihaila, 2018; Nica et al., 2018; Popescu et al., 2017; Sion, 2018a, b) is the prominent method with the cutting-edge records in numerous language pairs. All options of the attention mechanism employ only temporal awareness where one scalar value is allocated to one context vector matching a source word. (Choi et al., 2018) Undeveloped neural machine translation patterns are contingent on sequence-to-sequence learning that expresses in code a sequence of source words into a vector space and produces an additional sequence of target words from the vector: sentences are interpreted just as sequences of words with no internal structure. (Eriguchi et al., 2019) The naive back-translation method enhances the translation performance considerably, but its application for monolingual input is not relevantly valid as established neural machine translation patterns do not differentiate between the genuine parallel corpus and the back translated synthetic parallel one. (Yang et al., 2019)

3. Methodology and Empirical Analysis Building my argument by drawing on data collected from the Boston Consulting Group, Deloitte, eMarketer, Locaria, MIT Sloan Management Review, NCSC, and Statista, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding awareness and usage of translation applications featuring machine learning (%), how professional translators worldwide see artificial intelligence affecting their work in the future (%), and market size of the global language services industry (billion U.S. dollars). The results of a study based on data gathered from 4,200 respondents provide support for my research model. Employing the structural equation modeling and using the probability sampling technique, I collected and inspected data via a self-administrated questionnaire.

4. Results and Discussion

Current developments of neural machine translation are instrumental in performing translation by employing an uncomplicated end-to-end architecture. (Eriguchi et al., 2019) Similarly as any machine learning algorithms, neural networks represent a definite class of statistical learning patterns. (Petrucci et al., 2018) Machine translation is presently going through a paradigm repositioning from statistical to neural network patterns. (Moorkens, 2018) Neural machine translation generates significantly fewer lexical, morphology, and word order errors, better configurations in the rearrangement of verbs and nouns, but produces more inaccuracies in the translation of proper nouns than phrase-based approaches. (Bentivogli et al., 2018) Nearly all applications of neural machine translation patterns use a padding approach when processing a mini-batch to alter to the same length all sentences in it. (Qiao et al., 2018) Statistical machine translation systems are disadvantaged by fluency errors, notably as grammatical inaccuracies and ones concerning idiomatic word choices. (Tezcan et al., 2019) (Tables 1-6)

5. Conclusions and Implications

Neural machine translation is ordinarily enhanced to produce sentences which comprise n-grams with ground target to the fullest extent, but n-gram precisions, the physically fashioned approximate loss function, can misdirect the pattern to create suboptimal translations. (Yang et al., 2018) Handling the ontology learning problem as a neural machine translation assignment may be a sound manner to approach perpetual expressive ontology learning tasks (Bratu, 2018; Donnelly, 2017; King, 2017; Michailidou, 2018; Nica, 2017; Peters, 2017; Popescu, 2018; Skordoulis, 2016; Smith and Stirling, 2018), such as language inconsistency, domain self-determination, and significant engineering expenses. (Petrucci et al., 2018) Neural networks integrate frame of reference from the training input, source text, and elaborating target text and mostly generate words in the adequate context, although systems are nevertheless inconstant and necessitate human review. (Taivalkoski-Shilov, 2018)


This paper was supported by Grant GE-1287672 from the Cognitive Labor Institute, New York, NY.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


Balica, R. (2018). "Big Data Learning Analytics and Algorithmic Decision-Making in Digital Education Governance," Analysis and Metaphysics 17: 128-133.

Bentivogli, L., A. Bisazza, M. Cettolo, and M. Federico (2018). "Neural versus Phrasebased MT Quality: An In-Depth Analysis on English-German and English-French," Computer Speech & Language 49: 52-70.

Bolton, C, V. Machova, M. Kovacova, and K. Valaskova (2018). "The Power of Human-Machine Collaboration: Artificial Intelligence, Business Automation, and the Smart Economy," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 13(4): 51-56.

Bratu, S. (2018). "The Ethics of Algorithmic Sociality, Big Data Analytics, and Data-Driven Research Patterns," Review of Contemporary Philosophy 17: 100-106.

Choi, H., K. Cho, and Y. Bengio (2018). "Fine-Grained Attention Mechanism for Neural Machine Translation," Neurocomputing 284: 171-176.

Cruciani, M. (2018). "Explicit Communication: An Interest and Belief-based Model," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 17: 50-70.

Dicu, G. (2018). "Linguistic Practices in Gendered Institutional Settings: Speech Behavior of Female Political Leaders," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 8(1): 158-164.

Donnelly, R. (2017). "Blended Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: The Intersection of Social Learning and Technology," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 5(2): 25-50.

Eriguchi, A., K. Hashimoto, and Y. Tsuruoka (2019). "Incorporating Source-Side Phrase Structures into Neural Machine Translation," Computational Linguistics. doi:10.1162/COLI_a_00348.

Fabricio, B. F. (2016). "Repetition-Differentiation in an Online Debate on Sexualities: Re-Imagining Identity Meanings," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(1): 241-261.

Farber, M. (2017). "The Future of Journalistic Labor in the Age of Digital Narratives: The Algorithmic Authority of Automated News as a Legitimate Knowledge Producer," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 5(2): 199-204.

King, D. (2017). "Indeterminacy of Translation and Innate Concepts: A Critical Review," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 16: 104-141.

Lazaroiu, G. (2018). "Postmodernism as an Epistemological Phenomenon," Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1389-1390.

Machan, T. R. (2017). "Can People Obtain Objective Knowledge?," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 5(1): 90-119.

Michailidou, A. (2018). "Parallel Narratives, Colorful Visions: Enclosure and Liberation in Tracy Chevalier's The Virgin Blue," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 8(2): 11-28.

Mihaila, R., and M. Mateescu (2017). "The Gender Politics of Postfeminist Semantics," Journal of Research in Gender Studies 7(1): 255-261.

Mihaila, R. (2018). "The Ascendance of Postmodernism in the Educational Sphere," Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1578-1579.

Moorkens, J. (2018). "What to Expect from Neural Machine Translation: A Practical In-Class Translation Evaluation Exercise," The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12(4): 375-387.

Nica, E. (2017). "Techno-Pedagogy Knowledge in Smart Learning Environments," Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 12(1): 75-81.

Nica, E. (2018). "The Social Concretisation of Educational Postmodernism," Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1659-1660.

Nica, E., C. Manole, and C. I. Stan (2018). "A Laborless Society? How Highly Automated Environments and Breakthroughs in Artificial Intelligence Bring About Innovative Kinds of Skills and Employment Disruptions, Altering the Nature of Business Process and Affecting the Path of Economic Growth," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 6(4): 25-30.

Peters, M. A. (2017). "Disciplinary Technologies and the School in the Epoch of Digital Reason: Revisiting Discipline and Punish after 40 Years," Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 9(1): 28-46.

Petrucci, G., M. Rospocher, and C. Ghidini (2018). "Expressive Ontology Learning as Neural Machine Translation," Journal of Web Semantics 52/53: 66-82.

Popescu, G. H. (2017a). "The Economics of E-learning Production," Economics, Management and Financial Markets 12(1): 68-74.

Popescu, G. H. (2017b). "Organizational E-learning and Knowledge Management in Higher Education," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 5(1): 87-93.

Popescu, G. H., M. Comanescu, and C. Manole (2017). "Mobile Knowledge Work, Information Routines, and Digital Technologies," Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 5(2): 187-192.

Popescu, G. H. (2018). "Has Postmodernism the Potential to Reshape Educational Research and Practice?," Educational Philosophy and Theory 50(14): 1490-1491.

Qiao, Y., K. Hashimoto, A. Eriguchi, H. Wang, D. Wang, Y. Tsuruoka, et al. (2018). "Parallelizing and Optimizing Neural Encoder-Decoder Models without Padding on Multi-Core Architecture," Future Generation Computer Systems. doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.04.070.

Radulescu, A. (2017). "The Underlying Cognitive Mechanisms Involved in Consecutive Interpreting," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 16: 142-148.

Sion, G. (2018a). "Smart Educational Ecosystems: Cognitive Engagement and Machine Intelligence Algorithms in Technology-Supported Learning Environments," Analysis and Metaphysics 17: 140-145.

Sion, G. (2018b). "How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming the Economy. Will Cognitively Enhanced Machines Decrease and Eliminate Tasks from Human Workers through Automation?," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 6(4): 31-36.

Skordoulis, K. (2016). "Science, Knowledge Production and Social Practice," Knowledge Cultures 4(6): 291-307.

Smith, A., and A. Stirling (2018). "Innovation, Sustainability and Democracy: An Analysis of Grassroots Contributions," Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 6(1): 64-97.

Taivalkoski-Shilov, K. (2018). "Ethical Issues Regarding Machine(-assisted) Translation of Literary Texts," Perspectives. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1520907

Tan, Z., J. Su, B. Wang, Y. Chen, and X. Shi (2018). "Lattice-to-Sequence Attentional Neural Machine Translation Models," Neurocomputing 284: 138-147.

Tezcan, A., V. Hoste, and L. Macken (2019). "Estimating Word-Level Quality of Statistical Machine Translation Output Using Monolingual Information Alone," Natural Language Engineering. doi:10.1017/S1351324919000111

Yang, Z., W. Chen, F. Wang, and B. Xu (2018). "Generative Adversarial Training for Neural Machine Translation," Neurocomputing 321: 146-155.

Yang, Z., W. Chen, F. Wang, and B. Xu (2019). "Effectively Training Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Data," Neurocomputing 333: 240-247.


Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania

How to cite: Radulescu, Adina (2019). "Algorithmic Textual Practices: Improving Fluency and Word Order in Neural Machine Translation Output," Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 18: 126-132.

Received 17 December 2018 * Received in revised form 18 March 2019

Accepted 19 March 2019 * Available online 14 April 2019

Table 1 Awareness and usage of smartphone applications featuring
machine learning (%)

                                Awareness  Usage

Predictive text                    54       38
Route suggestions                  40       26
Voice assistants                   39       15
Voice search                       35       14
Translation apps                   31       16
Voice-to-text                      27       12
Email classification               26       11
Automated calendar entries         22        9
Location-based app suggestions     21       11
Automated photo classification     21        8

Sources: Deloitte; Statista; my survey among 4,200 individuals
conducted November 2018.

Table 2 Market size of the global language services industry (billion
U.S. dollars)

2009  23.5
2010  26.3
2011  28.34
2012  33.05
2013  34.78
2014  37.19
2015  38.16
2016  40.27
2017  43.08
2018  46.52
2019  49.14

Sources: Statista; my estimates.

Table 3 Do you utilize remote interpreting technology? (Check all that
apply, %)

Audio or telephonic interpretation (standard telephone)  88
Video conferencing                                       61
Video remote interpreting                                52
Web-based applications (e.g. Skype)                      48
Specialized telephone equipment                          34
Other technological solutions (please provide details)   23
Voice over internet protocol                             21
Translation software and automated interpreter software  18
N/A                                                       7

Sources: NCSC; my survey among 4,200 individuals conducted November

Table 4 Levels of understanding for artificial intelligence-related
technology and business context: To what extent do you agree with the
following statements about your organization? (%)

              We understand...      Pioneers  Investigators

Technology    Required                 92          78
implications  technological
              breakthroughs to
              succeed with
Technology    Data required for        87          76
implications  artificial
Technology    Processes for            86          70
implications  artificial
Business      Artificial               92          84
implications  intelligence-
              related changed
              ways of business
              value generation
Business      Development              85          74
implications  time of artificial
              based products
              and services
Business      Development              83          75
implications  costs of artificial
              based products
              and services
Workplace     Required changes         84          84
implications  of knowledge and
              skills for future
              intelligence needs
Workplace     Effect of artificial     87          78
implications  intelligence in the
              workplace on
Industry      Artificial               83          83
implications  intelligence-
              related shift of
              industry power

              Experimenters  Passives

Technology          27          15
Technology          24          11
Technology          20           7
Business            33          22
Business            21          18
Business            16          10
Workplace           22          19
Workplace           18          18
Industry            22          18

Sources: MIT Sloan Management Review; The Boston Consulting Group; my
survey among 4,200 individuals conducted November 2018.

Table 5 How professional translators worldwide see artificial
intelligence affecting their work in the future (%)

No impact whatsoever                        4
Less work for professional translators     46
Same volume but higher standards expected  37
Overall volume of work will grow           13

Sources: MIT Sloan Management Review; The Boston Consulting Group; my
survey among 4,200 individuals conducted November 2018.
COPYRIGHT 2019 Addleton Academic Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Radulescu, Adina
Publication:Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations
Date:Jan 1, 2019

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters